yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC U12+ Accessories] leginag:
Thanks for your great posts and reviews. You're a brand ambassador now haha :P

You are using a case? Which case are you using? I have ordered a Spigen and wondering if it will work together.

Did you get the Edge-to-Edge or the Case Friendly? And are you using the "Glass back only" or the full side and back coverage? Does it impede Edge sense as the website seems to indicate?

Edit: Also does this do impact protection? On the U12+ page it says "and even impact protection with our XTREME products." but can't tell if this is an Xtreme product?
[HTC U12+ Accessories] LibertyMonger:
I had the Coohaise case first, which is just like the Spigen, now I'm using the Rinke and they both work great with the front and back protector. I didn't use the full body with edge coverage. The edges wouldn't last long in a case.

The front and back protector do not impede edge sense at all but again, if you use the edge covering I'd imagine edge sense would eventually make the sides start to come apart.

I would say it would help with impact protection, mostly from scratching. But from a certain distance it will probably keep it from shattering since it holds together on the phone so tightly.

Also, they apply very easily. The more you stress it the harder it gets. Good luck buddy!
[HTC U12+ Accessories] leginag:
Thanks for your quick reply! Very helpful!

Been freaking out by the number of posts of people who have cracked their screen and been told that even HTC doesn't have repair parts in stock.

Also International Shipping =/= cheap. Rather than 20,000 vans, Amazon should buy more airplanes ;)
[HTC U12+ Accessories] gerzii:
I bought this one:

https://www.amazon.de/dp/B07CRVB2VC...olid=2BBLC2HN0SPDW&psc=0&ref_=lv_ov_lig_dp_it

it doesnt fit :(

Pictured is a transparent foil. When unpacking it is a black front.

It is also advertised with a full screen coverage, which is not true.

i ordered now this one:

https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B07C8CKX4B/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o06_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

i hope this one will fit.

........

i also ordered this one for fun:

https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B07...?ie=UTF8&psc=1
[HTC U12+ Accessories] LibertyMonger:
My PhantomSkinz front and back protectors are still absolutely perfect after months of use with a case and without. There was an instance when I first started using my Ringke case that caused the back center to look scuffed and separated my back skin from my phone but the skin healed itself and now it looks perfect again. Thanks again [MENTION=2098453]PhantomSkinz Guru[/MENTION]
[HTC U12+ Accessories] Annil:
As the U12+ is now out for some months - are there any combinations for case + glass screen protector that fit together?

Spigen Liquid Case and Pulen glass (https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B07CG6QY4C/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o05_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1) does not fit at least.

Glass is perfectly fitting, case, too. But both together, glass will get lifted by case :(

I really want to protect both...any ideas?
[HTC U12+ Accessories] gnabtib8:
I have been able to get glass screen protectors to fit with the Spigen clear case. I had to slightly stretch it out by putting in the OEM clear case inside of it for 24 hours. Case fits back on phone without forcing the screen protector out. Even Alignment of the screen protector is key
[HTC U12+ Accessories] LibertyMonger:
I just received my Spigen clear case and been using the same PhantomSkinz front and back protector since I received them months ago. Never had any issues with the Coohaise clear case or the Fusion X. I been switching back and forth between those cases, never once effected my protectors until I popped my phone into the Spigen. Caused my front screen protector to peel up in two corners. I think the lip wraps just a hair too much.

The Spigen seems better made but it seems the Coohaise and the Fusion X are more protector friendly. I may try your trick.
[HTC U12+ Accessories] LibertyMonger:
This seems to have worked. It seems the Spigen fits much better now.
[HTC U12+ Accessories] Suigintou:
Is it case friendly version or edge to edge ?
[HTC U12+ Accessories] harvey1483:
I have same question, case friendly doesn't cover the metal edge of phone?
[HTC U12+ Accessories] LibertyMonger:
Yes I have my original front and back protectors on and they are most definitely case friendly.

Not the full body protector. Just front and back.
[HTC U12+ Accessories] AtAM1:
I got the phantomskinz ultra clear professionally applied today at a phantomskinz outlet on both the front and back without the sides but with edge to edge on the glass - loving it!

I don't plan on using cases anymore as this phone was intended to be held without the additional bulk, and jittery edge experience, that the cases add.

This is going to be the last HTC phone I buy and will be holding on to it until the S10+ 5G 1TB is released later this year.
[HTC U12+ Accessories] LibertyMonger:
The PhantomSkinz front and back protectors are so good that when applied properly there is no way of knowing they are there. I have like 4 extra screen protectors and haven't had any need to use them. They all get better with age. Most definitely worth the price. The back of my U12+ feels just as premium as it does naked. Not one single flaw.

I ordered a set of back protectors cause I messed up my first install. You cannot try to hard. I had a fingerprint under my first install cause I removed it and reapplied it but even then it was near perfect. So since I got free review protectors, I paid for replacements cause they deserve it. My 2nd install of the back protector is freaking amazing. Not a single air bubble or any flaw whatsoever. I still have the original screen protector since about a year ago. Give them your money you won't regret it.
[HTC U12+ Accessories] DeeZZ_NuuZZ:
I'm not able to properly do this, always focked up everything, gonna try to find a local shop, which might do it for me on the front and back. Currently using a tempered glass on the front, but since they are cut too short it feels very annoying, when swiping from the sides, like when you want to use fluid gestures or so. And it looks bad, because it ends in the display and you have a slight rainbow there ?
[HTC U12+ Accessories] LibertyMonger:
I can't express enough how perfect the back protector is. When applied right there is nothing that shows that it's even there. Luckily my first attempt was successful so now I have a backup but if applied right, they last forever. Most definitely worth the money.

I already have backup screen protectors from my review samples so I didn't need them. My original screen protector is still perfect.
[HTC U12+ Accessories] rfgamaral:
In the PhantomSkinz website there's 2 options:

Ultra Clear (Edge to Edge)

Ultra Clear (Case Friendly)

Which one do you have and what exactly are the differences? Also, it states this:

Did you put "glass back only" in the comments?
[HTC U12+ Accessories] LibertyMonger:
The case friendly one is absolutely perfect for front and back if you use a case. They last forever when applied right. They apply so perfectly you never want to take them off.
[HTC U12+ Accessories] hojnol:
I consider their protectors to be a perfect product
[HTC U12+ Accessories] harvey1483:
Don't buy Phantomskinz screen protector Case friendly, it is awful! The skinomi front screen protector was better than Phantomskinz!
[HTC U12+ Accessories] captain008:
Hey gang does anyone have any experience or opinions on the Cell Helmet nano screen protectors? I am sending my phone in for another screen replacement, and trying to find something that provides impact and screen protection. Currently I have the Ringkre X case and an Invisishield and it appears its not enough. Im trying to protect my phone as this is the only HTC I've owned were the screen cracks so much (been faithful HTC owner since 2007).
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lmcmil:
Hello everybody

I have two HTC M9, one is bootloader unlocked, S-OFF, rooted with OS 4.28.401.3 running ViperOneM9 6.2.0 and the other one is bootloader unlocked, S-ON, rooted with OS 4.28.401.3 and stock ROM.

Had to hard reset the S-ON one and now i can't select portuguese language at setup.

My question is : can i migrate a TWRP backup from the S-OFF running ViperOneM9 6.2.0 to the S-ON running stock ROM?

Thanks in advance
[LG G7 ThinQ  Questions & Answers] Gumokz109:
Hi. I am noticing the Blink LED to blink at a slower interval - it is super annoying. It isn't as fast as the G5's Blink LED.

Does anyone else notice it too?
[LG G7 ThinQ  Questions & Answers] Mikestony:
Hmm, now that you mention it, yeah, I agree. I really didn't pay that much attention to my previous device's LED, but the G7 does appear to be lazy :p
[LG G7 ThinQ  Questions & Answers] hungryfortech:
It is a slower but I don't think there is a setting to increase its speed.
[LG G7 ThinQ  Questions & Answers] 20degrees:
This is what I use. It's the only one I found that works to modify the stock flash rate.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ledblinker.pro
[LG G7 ThinQ  Questions & Answers] igriks123:
LED not work normally on LG G7 ThinQ, this problem from LG was on LG G3 too. Need to wait for a new firmware, I think.:( Led blinker and other app not work with me LG g7.
[Blade General] lsjereza:
Hi every one

Trying to install TWRP I bricked my ZTE V6. it doesn't turn on or charge. i just got the red led when i connect it to my computer.

thanx in advance for any help
[Blade General] Robert342:
Read this thread:

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2163493

Good luck!
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Orthok:
Hi,

I am trying to get the wifi calling option to appear and work on my 960U1. Here is what I've done so far.

1. Utilized Odin 3.12.3 (not patched version that I've seen on some forum posts) to flash AIO firmware G960U1UEU1ARBG (which i'm pretty sure is the only cricket CSC from updato.com, Sammobile has nothing listed for AIO )

2. During flash I made sure to select the CSC (not HOME CSC)

3. The flash looks like it was successful and the phone was automatically factory reset.

3. I am still missing the wifi calling option (i checked both settings-> connection menus, and the Dialer. I also tried making a call in airplane mode with wifi and it said i needed to turn on cellular.

Does anyone have any ideas what I need to do? Only thing I can think of is I'm missing a firmware or I need to change how I'm flashing the phone.

Here is a link to the cricket website saying wifi calling is supported on the S9 https://www.cricketwireless.com/sup.../wifi-calling/customer/compatible-phones.html

Thank you
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Orthok:
Update:

So I was realized what I was missing was the AIO (Cricket) User Data. Once I located that and flashed it along with the Firmware using Odin I know have the Wifi-Calling button added to my phone. Now when I attempt to turn it on wifi-calling I get the "Please try again later" message.

I contacted Cricket Wireless Chat support, told them I have a S9 with cricket Firmware and they asked me to provide the IMEI, when I provided the IMEI they stated that it was for an unbranded S9 and that I would be unable to get wifi-calling to work on their network because of that.

Does anyone have any ideas on how I could get them to authorize my phone to get access?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] jdawgg21:
It is not going to work no matter what. You have to be using an iPhone or their Cricket Branded Android phones.... -_-
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Tel864:
Even if Crickett wanted to, their agreement with AT&T would probably prevent it. Even AT&T requires an iPhone or one of their branded phones for wifi calling. You can give up this fight.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] ajairola:
If you had another Cricket branded Android that is wifi calling capable you could have them hard set that IMEI in the system, and that should get your S9 working.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Orthok:
Thank you,

I've considered this option, but now I'm weighing another consideration. It looks like mobile hotspot is disabled on the cricket firmware with user data. So unless I pay for the service maybe i should stay on a generic firmware so that it will give me mobile hotspot vs wifi calling...
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] BigQuark:
\Again, FYI and maybee everyone already knows this.

The idea behind the "unlocked" handset and Android was that each carrier would have its own app to use for these handsets to enable these IMS features. As usual, the wireless US carriers have perverted the concept to tell then end user to f*ck off because you did not pay a premium for the carrier branded/bloated handset.

Man....MINT SIM is looking good.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] AlexusJ:
Just FYI, Wi-Fi Calling will work fine on U1 flashed to Cricket's firmware. You just need to provision your SIM card for Wi-Fi Calling, to do that you need to insert your SIM into iPhone (SE or 6/7/8/x) and activate Wi-Fi Calling on that phone and test it out, once you see it active - remove SIM card and put it back to your S9. After you put the SIM back into your S9 - do a network settings reset, after that the Wi-Fi Calling should work. This is how I made my S9 work. If you don't have anyone to borrow iPhone from - go to your local Apple store, buy one then return it next day ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Houckinternet:
Where did you find the User Data file? I've been looking high and low and just can't find any. Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] A0425A:
Also would like to know where you got the UserData.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] suhsix:
I've been attempting to get this working on my ATT (carrier unlocked) S10+, but since Cricket only supports the S10 (not +) I'm unable to find an appropriate userdata. Do I have any options?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] TheMadScientist:
Wifi calling will work on non cricket device under one condition. You activate wifi calling on a cricket device. With your sim in it. Then put the sim in your phone. I also flash any multi csc firmware. And place cricket sim in the device so it auto personalizes. so then you have cricket firmware so to speak. I'm using a g950u xfinity right now on cricket with bit 7 even though cricket has only bit 6 out. And he calling and wifi calling work great

---------- Post added at 01:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------

This is not true
[Samsung Gear S3] rix042:
Guys i found several ROms but i dont know CQKL BH1 BQC5. This Watch was bought in Poland which if i reset the Watch always Poland Language i live in Germany. So i dont know which ROM to flash i lastly flashed BQC5 it was fine but although Bluetooth Transfer was hella slow and the Battery Drain was still .... So Please guys Help me what are the Version Differences.

My Watch Details: R760

Version: 3.0.0.2 Tizen (NOW)

KNOX: 2.2

Software Version: R760XXU2CRE3
[Samsung Gear S3] adfree:
Der Sales Code/CSC ist die Ursache, wieso da eine andere Sprache erscheint als "erwartet"...

Du könntest den ändern... auf DBT zum Beispiel.

Das hat nur Auswirkungen ob Du zukünftige Updates vom "polnischen" Server bekommst, oder vom dt...

Wenn man auf XAR umstellt, könnte man noch mit Samsung Pay rumpsielen... und hätte die Updates "schneller" vom US Server...

Das mit dem Akku ist leider eine andere Geschichte...

Das ist Bockmist den Samsung verzapft hat... mit ihrem "intelligenten" Akku s h it...

Ich persönlich habe keine Lösung, da mich das nicht tangiert... da ich nur rumspiele mit der Gear...

Samsung hat das aber mit fast allen Gear Geräten geschafft...

Gear S2 User heulen

Gear S3 User...

Gear Fit 2 User...

:rolleyes:

Meine persönliche Meinung ist das es auch mit dem dämlichen Gear Manager Zeugs auf dem Handy zu tun hat...

Also leider auch ne Wechselwirkung zwischen 2 Geräten + 2 verschiedenen Software...

Das ist also nicht zwangsläufig so einfach zu lösen...

Das hat was mit Calibrierungsdaten etc. zu tun...

Der Akku an sich dürfte nicht wirklich das Problem sein...

MfG
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] bluesfan77:
I'm new to all of this, so please bear with me.

I know that the device is G4. I've already played around with flashing to where I've only flashed once and flashed using the Faria G4 step by step...http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=298967

I'd like to try a different ROM, but different things I've read have mentioned flashing back to the original ROM and starting over. However, I don't have the T-Mobile ROM. In the end, I would be using the device on ATT's network. I didn't know if I could "start from scratch" by using the ATT rom (RUU_Wizard_225111_22511102_022511_CWS_WWE_Ship_1.exe).

I pretty much want to blow away the T-Mobile stuff as I'll never use them.

I'm doing all of this because "something's wrong". It seems that any use of the wi-fi and using IE kills the battery. If I set the power management to anything other than "best performance" I cannot surf the net as everything "times out" and pages don't load.

The reason I started all of this is because I needed the newer version of WM so I could connect to an AP using WPA with AES. The WM5 that was on the MDA didn't have AES.

Any ideas/thoughts/help?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] mestrini:
I never flash to an original ROM when trying new ones. I don't believe in the myth that an official ROM provides a strong base for upgrading. It's all a matter of deleting bytes and writing new ones so why bother? :p

If you don't want operator customizations then just do a hard-reset (loosing all user data) and soft-reset before the customization process. But i strongly advise to try new 6.1 ROMs out there that you'll have a great system to work with (don't forget to use an overcloking/CPU sacling app to get speed)

cheers
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] zabardast_1:
YUP! Very well said m8 :D excellent tip and info,cudn't agree more myself.I have never reflashed to any stock rom before any upgrade and never had any problems.

I'll just add here,as you have a G4 device,don't use 'Shell Tool',just 'HardSPL' it and you'll never feel the need to reflash any official stock rom to have a solid base.

Cheers!
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] bluesfan77:
That's one other thing I wanted to check. The instructions I've read on this site explain pretty well the step by step of going from the original ROM to a new ROM. I followed the "Wizard Windows Mobile 6 for newbies" on the wiki and then used the files from the Faria how-to. Once I've did the HardSPL install steps, is it always there? Or was it overwritten by the new ROM?

I guess I'm wondering what step I would start at for a new ROM...would I just repeat all the steps?

Also, I guess I'll always have to do the soft reset to stop the T-Mobile stuff from loading? If anything, I'd rather have the ATT stuff as I'd use their network and not T-Mobile or just have nothing.

The last thing I don't want is a brick. :-)

Thanks for all the help! This is quite the learning experience and after my first flash I totally "geeked out".

Also, I've notice that it seems some of the ROMs are unclear as to if they are G4 or not. Unless I missed it, is there, by chance, a running list of all the ROMs? Or is it just a matter of reading all the pages of the forum? It'd be handy if there was a list of all the ROMs and if they were G4 or not.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] zabardast_1:
Well,once 'HardSPL' applied will remain 'HardSPL' unless you remove it personally to revert back to official stock wm5 rom .Remember,there's no official wm6 upgrade offered by either T-mobile or At&tt,all the wm6 roms available here in this forum are custom build wm6 roms and they don't have any T-mobile or At&tt stuff included in them.

All the wm6 custom build roms are safe for G4 devices as they don't have any IPL/SPL included in them.Only roms with IPL/SPL in it are not safe for flashing to a G4 phone.Even after the 'HardSPL',the official stock rom cannot be flashed,until and unless,first 'HardSPL' is to be removed and official G4 IPL/SPL are flashed back.

Cheers!
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] bluesfan77:
Ok, now I understand!

Thanks!

I'm having a lot of fun with this.
[Xiaomi Redmi 5A Guides, News, & Discussion] Dragomirka:
Anyone willing to port Flyme 6 and NFUI 7?

More info:

http://www.flymeos.com/flyme6

http://www.neffos.com/en/nfui/
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] ayushk780:
Reserved

Reserved
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] ayushk780:
Download links

Download Here
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] ayushk780:
Changelog

Initial Build.
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] alreadyregistered:
Theme default?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] Iyiren:
ohoh
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] raymondsanusi:
Decryption support?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] rahulk096:
Yeah ...thanks
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] carlosggb:
Great work!!!

One thing, if you don't add password protection to the recovery then the password/pin remover option can go against us real quick :confused:

Just a constructive remark
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] hadiyalkishan:
Does it support ota update like redwolf ?

Thanks for your work dev ?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] Subash.rawal:
Do it support back and restore of rom

Anyone tried it

None of the recovery work red wolf and twrp
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] GuestK00324:
Any screen shot please
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] ayushk780:
In case of normal TWRP/ any custom recovery password/pin can be removed very easily (by removing a couple of files)

So yeah Recovery password is recommended.
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] raymondsanusi:
Does it support decryption?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] yaardina:
New version? I love ur recovery..... Ota setting work great..... I found new version on androidfilehost,may I try? Or any major bug? Thanks
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] kbsarfaraz:
Give some screenshots & what's the Hal3
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries,] LeekGeek:
Hal3 is cam2api
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JCGT90:
Okay so i have updated my phone (moto z play) to android 8.0 via official 8.0. I have a problem with system ui draining so much battery since the update. I have done full data wipe and monitored the phone without installing any third party apps, just pure stock and the system ui drain is still there, heck even just looking at the screen without doing nothing that high cpu usages goes on, monitored in safe mode (system ui drain gone).

I have reached out to the lenovo reps and they don't seem very much helpful either. I think its the update to oreo that has been causing this drain but i think i'm the only one with the 'system ui" battery drain bug. i can pinpoint it at the top of my battery stats via gsam. It has been like that for a month and it is really frustrating since it really cut of my SOT for a couple of hours use.

Is there any fix on this? is it possible i just had a corrupt ota download? can i re install android 8.0 even if im already in 8.0. Btw i'm all on stock. Not rooted or anything.

Here are a few screenshots:View attachment 4529797

View attachment 4529798

View attachment 4529799

View attachment 4529800

View attachment 4529801