yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[General Questions and Answers] Ibuprophen:
From what I can see, here's some options to help you out...

The following is the Enhanced Tag link that's specific to the Z17 Lite (created for a possible future dedicated area on the forum).

https://xdaforums.com/t/nubia-z17-lite

The following are just a few threads that you can always try to obtain some member guidance within one of them that's specific to your device.

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3729616

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3777796

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3724069

If all else fails, you can take a look through the following Z17 area of the forum to see if you can obtain some member guidance within one of the threads there.

https://xdaforums.com/nubia-z17

I do wish you the best of luck!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT provide support via PM unless asked/requested by myself. PLEASE keep it in the threads where everyone can share.
[Android General] Jrhotrod:
Hello all! I'm sure most of you are familiar with Google Play Services, the base of Google's Android framework and the brains behind all the Google things you do on your phone. Less of you, however, might also know that Play Services is notorious for being a beast of an application that no one truly knows the function of.

Below here is a rough explanation of Play Services from what I know about it. You can skip this if you already know and move on to the bread and butter of this post.

Play Services is proprietary software, meaning that its source code is not available to the public. All of Google's apps are proprietary like this as well. While developers like Chainfire have legitimate reasons to close off their app source code so others don't steal it, and so does Google, it is extra worrying from a company that makes a profit off of collecting userdata. Many people, including me, do not trust Google with our data, so we try to avoid their products as much as possible.

I thought that it would be nice to create a megathread of sorts with various users' suggestions on how to subvert the constant surveillance of Play Services, while also attempting to maintain the useful functionality of it. Below are some of the primary methods that I have thought of, and that I and some others have tried:

LineageOS/CyanogenMod Privacy Guard - If you are using LineageOS or any derivative thereof, you can go to Privacy Guard and deny certain permissions from Play Services. I and another user have denied permissions from Play Services without side effects, but your mileage may vary. [MENTION=5795145]javelinanddart[/MENTION] said on Reddit that Privacy Guard does indeed block permissions from Play Services and other system apps, so rest assured that Privacy Guard actually does something rather than being a placebo.

XPrivacyLua - This is an Xposed module that feeds false data to apps rather than blocking it entirely. I haven't tried this method myself, but the XDA post I linked above reports that XPrivacyLua works, even in tandem with Privacy Guard.

microG - microG is an open-source alternative to Play Services. It emulates many key functions of Play Services - push notifications, location services, etc - without the data collection running alongside such functionality. To clarify, this is a full replacement for Play Services, so you would flash a microG package instead of a GApps package. There are lots of bugs, though, even admitted by the developer. If you want to learn more, I suggest you visit the XDA thread for it, or view the implementation progress for various pieces of functionality.

There is nothing else that I know of, so if anybody knows of another viable method or can provide their own experiences with the above ones, your contributions would be appreciated by me and the rest of the privacy community.
[Android General] kurtn:
Thanks for thread.

My only reason to use custom ROM is because they are GApps-free. In nearly every other aspect stock ROMs are better. Phones without good custom ROM I simply setup without Google account and install f-droid and yalp stores.

Another idea:

Imagine: Google is not as evil as we think: there are many privacy related settings in your Google account. You can login with a web browser and try through all these settings - and hope.
[Android General] Oswald Boelcke:
Device is a Samsung i9305 with RR-N-v5.8.5-final, Magisk v16.0, XPosed, XPrivacyLua, microG (via NanoDroid). No genuine Google services; Google Play Store is the one and only Google application installed.

I hope it suits into this thread (thanks very much for creating it!), and I'd like to share my settings. Please refer to the screenshots; I think it's self-explaining where they where taken from.

Actually no restrictions to microG, only to Play Store.

Remarks: µG has no restrictions in the firewall (AFWall+ Donation Beta); Play Store only granted internet access via WiFi and VPN. Just for completeness; running a RaspberryPi in the home network with Pi-Hole installed and acting as the DNS-server in the network. Unless using the home network i.e. using a foreign WiFi network or mobile data, ALWAYS establishing my own secure VPN to my RaspberryPi (with PiVPN installed) via OpenVPN and again the Pi acting as the DNS-server. If interested in further details please refer to this thread.
[Android General] Exabyter:
Thanks for this.

I was considering asking for a forum section here devoted to privacy, but it doesn't seem like a popular subject here. (After all, most of the people who have already picked the most snoopery OS in the world could be assumed to be not particularly worried about privacy. ? )

I come from a different motivation: the hope that by using a somewhat hackable OS, one can theoretically modify it in ways to achieve one's objectives, including privacy. But the last few years have made it rather clear that the Big G is working determinedly to foil such efforts.

Lately that seems to take the form of pushing more and more essential services into the Gplay frameworks, and deprecating perfectly working things like GCM in favor of intertwining it with Firebase, which may saddle us with that analytics data vacuum in order to get another essential service, push notifications.

Re: revoking permissions from Gplay frameworks, I feel like Google's determination to get their hands on data by hook or by crook (eg their ignoring of user preferences to disable various radios and enabling them in the background anyway, to track location and such) means they will quite possibly circumvent these preferences at some point as well.

As I mentioned in another thread I've experienced various problems in the past when I tried to aggressively restrict perms on the Gplay services using CM/LOS Privacy Guard, but perhaps some of that came from choosing interactive restriction prompts rather than blanket revoking. I do know that so many essential services are tied-into the Gplay frameworks these days that blocking tons of perms will inevitably cause breakage of some things depending how you use your device.
[Android General] Oswald Boelcke:
Due to your request above, please allow me to draw your attention to two threads by me. In these threads I tried about one and a half year ago to initially capture but also to update how I believe to have enhanced the battery duration, privacy and security of my GT-i9305 and how I went for a GApps-free device with microG.

Over the time until today, some of the described implementations, applications and measures became absolete or were replaced by others (e.g. using NanoDroid - or Nanomod as it was called in the beginning, since it has come out). Some changes occured due to the step from Marshmellow to Nougat or the non-availabilty of the official Xposed framework for Nougat in the very beginning. However, over all the time I've tried to maintain both threads updated and amended but currently not to much occuring on that frontline, probably because I've received a privacy status on our devices that obviously satisfies me in my personal opinion.
[Android General] Jrhotrod:
Wow, this is really great! Very high-quality thread.

Will add to OP later today ;)
[Android General] Oswald Boelcke:
I apologise for the double post (original in my thread here) but I guess it also suits in this thread.

Found the below quoted post by @jawz101 in the XPrivacyLua thread here. Pretty interesting, and therefore I like to share:

However, I suggest to also follow the discussion/conversation between jawz101 and M66B, which has developed after this post.
[Android General] Exabyter:
This is certainly an important discovery, thanks for the news.

Now for the sidenote that's 10x longer than the main comment. ?

One of the key issues I have with the various "privacy tools" is trying to figure out whether or not I trust all these entities that produce these diagnostic things to not be a solution worse than the problem when it comes to possessing and safeguarding my sensitive personal data.

It's getting to the point where I'm no longer enamored of giving *anyone* access to such stuff if I can help it, no matter *who* they are.

Even if they're not lying about their intentions and their commitment to security/privacy, there are still matters like carelessness/incompetence and targeted attacks to worry about.
[Android General] Oswald Boelcke:
@Exabyter: You're statement and expressed concerns are abolutely correct. Nothing to add except that I wouldn't limit it to "privacy tools" but especially include all applications that require root (and get it granted by the user) or all Magisk and Xposed modules. The latter should definitely concern.

My personal decision:

I'm not willing to trust anybody from the very beginning but I'm willing to trust single persons, groups or agencies. I've developed my own, private criteria, to which I stick but I've also admit the final decision isn't always based on rationality but also a lot on my feeling (in my stomage).

I don't held any confidential data on my device but privacy related ones, and I don't use my device for any kind of banking, shopping or payments.

I consider to use tools, modules and applications if their functionality rests within my defined specifications for the use of my device. Then I go for "the shopping tour" while I try to look into the details of the tools under closer examination, which includes where is it from, who's the developer etc.

I'll continue with the measures already described in one of my threads.
[OnePlus 5T  Questions & Answers] racinmason001:
Why do i have almost 30gb system space i can't use?
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] cloneman1:
I cracked my camera's glass when I dropped the phone and now it doesn't take good pictures anymore, even with the glass completely removed. They come out blurry and can't seem to focus properly.

The front facing shooter works fine

what happened?
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] Jeik:
It might've been damaged. Even a small dot on the lens can do a lot of harm to the imags.
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] naixx:
I know the problem looks similar but

I have a Fire HDX 7 that is not recognized by windows 7, two laptops. My huawei p9 is recognized perfectly. Recent amazon drivers are installed.

The device is not even visible in device manager, by can be charged by laptop. I have tried about 4-5 cables already on each of two laptops with win 7.

OS version 4.5.5.3

Any suggestion? Any way to check if it is hardware problem or software?:confused:
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] DB126:
If the HDX is not recognized in Windows Device Manager any of the three primary modes (unlocked FireOS, recovery and/or bootloader/fastboot) one of the data pins in the USB connector is likely damaged or otherwise nonfunctional. Be sure compatible drivers are available on the host; for whatever reason Motorola drivers seem to work best on Windows. Install the manager linked below; you do not need to launch it.

https://motorola-global-en-aus.custhelp.com/app/answers/prod_detail/a_id/86934/p/154,4222
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] naixx:
Just tried that. No luck. Downgraded to 13.3.2.8 - no luck. It seems that the problem is with USB.

What I want is to install vanilla android on the device. It seems root can be acquired without USB, but bootloader not. So are there any good tutorials on how to take apart Kindle HDX 7? Checked youtube - not that detailed tutorials that I want probably.

Thinking to order a new USB and battery on aliexpress
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] DB126:
For the same appx cost you can probably score a gently used HDX 7. Cracking open a HDX is not for the faint of heart due to copious use of industrial strength glue. Good luck.
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] ChickenKyrie:
Blame it to all Quick Charge 2.0 and 3.0 Chargers!

I almost have the same problem, Back to my old stock locked bootlader, everything was working fine, i can conmect my KFH on my pc and i can aldo charge using my tronsmart QC 3.0 charger, all of the happy moment was gone, until i've managed to unlocked the bootlaser(limeage 14.1 installed), the first thing i did'nt notice about it, then one day my kindle charges so slow, and i even cant connect it to my pc, looks like ive been screwed up, im still searching for solutions.. any ideas?
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] DB126:
HDX was not designed for higher voltage delivered by QC 3.0 chargers; may have fried some internals.

For reference, max uptake for a 3rd (and likely 4th) gen HDX is 9W/1.8A at 5V. That can be delivered by *ANY* decent charge brick rated at 2A or better. No need for a QC or other speciality charger. HDX devices can not take advantage of the capabilities of such chargers and may be damaged if proper voltage is not negotiated (i.e. anything significantly above 5V).
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] naixx:
Seems my problem is usb connector
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] naixx:
For anyone interested

The problem was in USB cable(the price about $8), I ordered a new one, replaced it and kindle is now fully recognized by windows!

Unfortunately, I've broken the glass :( So touch is not working for about 20% of the screen. So stupid mistake, pushed a little bit too much. Anyways I didn't use that kindle for at least 2 years, wanted to make it vanilla android
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] DB126:
For the benefit of future readers: crappy cables are the root cause of most HDX USB connectivity issues. A cable that works in some scenarios (charging; adb) may not work in others (fastboot). No one wants to believe this as a cable is a cable, right? What could go wrong?? Read through 5+ years of posts where the eureka moment occurs only after swapping out the umbilical cord.

FWIW - I did not suggest a cable to the OP as he/she stated "4-5 cables" were already tried.
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] naixx:
Sorry, there is some misunderstanding. I replaced usb port, not cable

Like this one

[IMG="usb port"]https://snag.gy/zpZ6N8.jpg[/IMG]
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] DB126:
Ah - I did misunderstand. Thanks for the clarification! This item (cause) was suggested in an earlier post. Glad you got it fixed - albeit not without panel damage. Tough break after getting it open w/o cracking the case or screen.
[Kindle Fire HDX 7" & 8.9" Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] rabaker07:
Wow, I was hoping that it was just the cable as in your first response (still agreed with DB126 that the usb cable is usually the problem in these situations). But it looks like this time it's the actual port. I am not happy to hear this. My cable works for adb with my pixel 2xl, so it's probably not the cable. :'(

Any ideas on how to fix the port without breaking my HDX like the OP did? I don't want to open it up if I can help it. Perhaps I can use a circuit tester to see which pin is not working well, and possibly bend it or otherwise fix it manually without replacing?
[General Questions and Answers] iSage24:
Hello Everybody,

I am looking for advice. I have Lenovo TB3-850F and i have tried to ROOT tab and install new ROM, but I have installed wrong version of TWRP (from other device) via ADB , and after that my TAB now constantly rebooting (bootloop). Recovery menu is not working tried all available combination its only restarts ir loading again. All what i can see is Lenovo logo and black screen again and again. I cant connect to computer because after restarting its everytime disconnecting.

Maybe someone know how can i fix it ?
[General Questions and Answers] Ibuprophen:
I don't have this device but, you should be able to obtain some member guidance within one of the following threads that's specific to your device.

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3559786

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3598727

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3700868

Good Luck!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT provide support via PM unless asked/requested by myself. PLEASE keep it in the threads where everyone can share.
[General Questions and Answers] iSage24:
Thank you, Found the solution :)
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
As always, big thanks to [MENTION=5974762]NurKeinNeid[/MENTION]!

Initial release notes:

Stock Lineage Device tree: no open commits merged

Stock Lineage kernel: no open commits merged

DotOS gerrit here
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
Mine too!!
[Nextbit Robin] Rimmer1966:
Couple of questions. Is there any difference between this and the version posted in the Pixel Experience thread? Is there any point flashing this if I already have that installed?

Second, any ideas what the square icon in the status bar is? And is there a way to get rid of it?

[IMG="screen"]https://www.dropbox.com/s/1f2xyuk8pumkv2z/Screenshot_Nova_Launcher_20180704-083601.png?dl=1[/IMG]
[Nextbit Robin] NurKeinNeid:
You mean on the right side? This is NFC. You can turn NFC off if you don't need it or check the statusbar settings to hide the icon.
[Nextbit Robin] Rimmer1966:
Thanks, I knew it would be something obvious!!!
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
No, they are basically the same although I just compiled a build with PE's kernel, device tree and vendor. I'm testing it as we speak and there Should be a new build up here in the next hour or so if things go smoothly.
[Nextbit Robin] Raiz:
Will you maintain this ROM , or it is just a build for those who haven't a powerful enough PC ( like me)?
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
I plan on providing updates as much I can. Official support would be awesome but I'm still tinkering with things before I fill out the form in order for me to do so
[Nextbit Robin] Raiz:
Ok , thanks for your time :svetius: , Official support would be awesome.
[Nextbit Robin] beard805:
Hello!

Thank you for the build, this is awesome :)

Quick question: Does anyone else have any issues getting through the setup? Once I painfully get through it after clicking back and next to finally get it to respond and get to the desktop, it's verrrry laggy.

I'm trying to do a complete wipe, including internal storage to see if it makes a difference.

Has anyone else experienced this?

Love the Android P UI!

EDIT: I found that I didn't install Magisk yet, and the install is going a LOT better. I'm not lagging nearly as much, so I'm going through this all without Magisk yet, and once I get everything setup I'm going to install to see result. I'm also using Pico OpenGapps.

Thank you!
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
What build date are you on? I had uploaded a build with SElinux in enforcing (which caused a lot of system lag) and took it down after I tested it extensively. Clean flash to the 03 or 06 build. Only difference between those builds is 06 has been compiled with SDClang 3.8. Other than that there's no lag on my end at all with the mentioned builds. Next build will have July security patches
[Nextbit Robin] demeez:
I'm assuming that was the dotOS-O-v2.3.1-ether-UNOFFICIAL-20180704 build? That's the one I tried and it was unbearably laggy. I'm not seeing an 06 build on your drive though, just the 03 and 04.
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
Yeah, I apologize for that. I'll have to check my drive, though I had uploaded it to the same folder this morning and 04 is not there anymore.

Edit: 06 is there. Try clearing your browser's cache

I just merged the changes to add back back IMS, CNE, and DPM from omni to the device tree for DotOS. I'll need testers for VoLTE if anyone's interested as I don't have cellular service myself.
[Nextbit Robin] beard805:
Odd, I know the first time I tried it, it was with the 04 build, correct. It happened with the 03 build, but that was earlier this afternoon. I'm going to give the 06 build a try.

Thank you for all the work you do, have some thanks! :)

Thanks!
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
Are you clean flashing?
[Nextbit Robin] beard805:
Hello!

Yeah I'm actually doing a full wipe, even internal data. Then I throw the zip files into TWRP, and flash them individually. Starting with ROM, then GAPPS. I have the 06 build right now, and I tried installing Magisk from TWRP at the same time as the ROM and GAPPS and it still gave me the laggy setup/UI; once I re-wiped and started over with just the ROM and GAPPS it worked flawlessly.

Just or an experiment, I flashed Magisk after the fact, and it causes the UI to have many lag issues.

I hope this is helping development at all, I'm not meaning to be a pest, I apologize.

Thank you!
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
I use magisk and have been flashing it before the first boot and sometimes even afterwards. I haven't faced any lag other than in the setup and even then it was minimal from what I've seen and I've been flashing test builds all week.
[Nextbit Robin] Raiz:
Hello Anierin , can you tell me ( if you're using this ROM as your daily driver ) how the battery life is ?
[Nextbit Robin] AnierinB:
It's pretty great Imho. I own two robins at the moment, one for testing and one for daily use. I've been on the 03 build since I compiled it and haven't run into any battery life issues. I personally think it's on par with other 8.1 ROMS for the robin although I haven't exactly compared them side by side due to the fact of me testing things constantly. :o
[HTC Vox] hoyler30589:
hi all ive managed to reconstruct the orange rom that was on the ftp and flashed it to my phone.

it does load up and work but it looks like a romanian rom and therefore not what i was hoping.

i havent tested it further than flashing and booting. im working on getting a uk version so watch this space!!
[HTC Vox] lerameur:
That's really cool, i need it!

If you can share this rom, it will be great!

Thanks, good job
[HTC Vox] hoyler30589:
i will upload the rom this evening bout 22.00 uk time as thats when my upload speed cap stops.

happy to share,

richard
[HTC Vox] lerameur:
Ok,

I will probably send my phone to orange if it works...

Thanks
[HTC Vox] tfly:
I will do the same thing if this succeeded !