yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] EeZeEpEe:
You used to get a true 48 hours off the charger all the time? I got 27 hours off the charger with 4.5 SOT which is great for me.

View attachment 4526972View attachment 4526973View attachment 4526974View attachment 4526975
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] stevemw:
I startrd with DP2 on 5/11. History (as much as I remembered to capture):
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] stevemw:
I startrd with DP2 on 5/11.

Sorry for the double posting.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] EeZeEpEe:
That last screenshot is with DP3? That's a pretty significant drop in off the charger and SOT.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] stevemw:
Yes. Most times I find the device shut off with no battery left. I hope this is something that can be fixed in DP4 due in the next week or so.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] arvylas:
I don't think it's the Dp3 that causes your problems. I'm with Dp3 and flash kernel and it's by far the best battery life i ever had. Try finding the culprit with better battery stats and if that doesn't work i'd suggest a clean install.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] daniel4653:
My first rodeo with DP3 View attachment 4527370
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] nullness:
I think I know the problem: dp3 enables adaptive battery which for me caused massive drain. Turning it off got me back to normal battery usage. According to others, people who had adaptive battery on before dp3 didn't see a change, but those like me that didn't got terrible drain. One other note is that the release notes for dp3 mention battery life regressions so I would expect at least slightly worse battery life than dp2, though currently I'm not seeing it.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] EeZeEpEe:
Interesting. That's obviously the opposite of what's intended for that feature. I have yet tried without while in DP3. With DP2 and it's issue of turning off Adaptive Battery automatically the last week or so, I did notice worse battery.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] nullness:
It was suggested to me that keeping adaptive battery on would eventually result in better battery life, but the drain was so bad I never bothered trying.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] stevemw:
[MENTION=2840465]EeZeEpEe[/MENTION]: Yes, the last 2 are DP3. As you can see battery usage is getting worse.

I'm going to turn off Adaptive battery and see if that changes anything.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] stevemw:
Had no effect and would not stick.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] EeZeEpEe:
Turning off Adaptive Battery wouldn't stick? Sounds the reverse of the issue DP2 had. It wouldn't stay on the last 2 weeks.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] thatotherguy..:
My battery is pretty good View attachment 4538583
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] techlogik:
I'm running DP3 rooted Magisk 16.4.2 beta with Flash v9 latest kernel, facedown, 3hrs later, phone is still at 99% battery. I find this phenomenal. Also noted, before even putting Flash kernel on, even the stock kernel/OS with DP3 was getting really good battery life while surfing/setting up apps etc. Big improvement over 8.1 Oreo IMO for me.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] omar_yasser:
I can confirm that battery life is alot better after disabling adaptive battery on dp3 (me too upgraded to android dp3 from oreo 8.1)
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] jimv1983:
I've experienced similar issues just with Android Oreo during the 8 months I've had my Pixel 2 XL. I also got 2 days (with like 9 hours screen on time) at the beginning. Now I get much less. It's just something you have to deal with I guess. Just last night Android System and Android OS both used 6% for a total of 12% in just 6 hours. I've never gotten an update from Google that actually fixed battery life issues. At best an update doesn't impact battery life at all and that's just monthly updates. Major updates always make it worse. At this point I just expect from major updates. I'm not expecting any different when Android P is officially released.

---------- Post added at 05:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:20 PM ----------

Wow, that's pretty bad. Worse than Oreo. Even with my much worse battery life than when getting the phone the battery life you show would still leave me with like 15%. Brand new that kind of use left me with 40-45%. If that's what I have to look forward to I'm not interested.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] stevemw:
I'm hoping this issue will be corrected in DP4.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] EeZeEpEe:
Was that bad, good, or great for you? Cause jimv1983 is quick to assume it's terrible.

You need to chill already with the "that's terrible compared to what I got my before..." whatever update posts. We get it, you're not happy that updates apparently "killed" your battery life to average now.
[Google Pixel 2 XL Guides, News, & Discussion] jimv1983:
I guess they might consider it good if they never knew what was possible before.

Yeah, I'm not happy. I can't be the only one that has seen the very large increase in battery drain (50% is big). My hope is that more people will complain to Google and they might eventually actually FIX the problem.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] BlackAxiom:
I used this script to make my rom to be flashed on multiple variants with different kernel, ideal for Samsung devices but it will work on any device, either use whole script or just use the kernel flash script

Master branch includes full script including rom, kernel and magisk flash

Experimental branch includes only kernel flash script (copy and paste to end of your updater script)

https://github.com/Dyeide/multikernel-flash-script
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] digger16309:
I got a new OP5 (had a OP3). I unlocked the bootloader, installed TWRP, and was looking to root and load LOS 15.1.

I did that, sort of, but then got spooked because every zip I flashed, I got this error:

failed to mount partition '/vendor' (invalid argument)

I flashed back to stock and all seemed well, though I also got stock recovery. When I installed TWRP again and then a custom kernel, I got the same error. Then I couldn't boot with the custom kernel and now I'm headed back to stock.

When I go in to Mount in TWRP, it won't let me select vendor to be mounted.

What's causing that and how do I fix it?
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] Revenant Ghost:
TWRP is just complaining about the missing 'vendor' partition, that only exists in Project Treble ROMs. Therefore, there's nothing to fix. Ignore the error.
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] Dirk:
https://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=76621704&postcount=285

That one has been modified to remove the warning.
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] Elleby:
As already wroted, it's just a "cosmetic" bug. Imho it's not a good thing to fix it: every time TRWP release a new patch of their software, you have to wait a lone programmer that modifies the new patch in order to remove this message error.

Consider also this: with next release of Android, named P for now, that is already available as beta for Oneplus 6, the project Treble will be mandatory and not optional as for Android Oreo. There are already some rumors that Oneplus 5/5T will receive update to Android P, and the problem with vendor partition will be gone forever.
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] shadowstep:
That's true, but till then, this lone programmer (me :p) will patch any updated TWRP that is released so that the the error isn't displayed if you aren't on a treble-compatible ROM. ;)
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] digger16309:
Thanks all. That makes sense, and also explains why I didn't see it previously with TWRP for OP3.
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] Astur_Torque:
Source of this, please?
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] shadowstep:
Check out this article, point 3 under "Will my device benefit from Project Treble".
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] Elleby:
Official statement on Oneplus forum. That part in particular:

For me that means that they will release Android P on Oneplus5/5T after the initial release for Oneplus 6.

And Project Treble mandatory, link on discussion on reddit. That part in particular:
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] Astur_Torque:
But there does not mention anything about that is compulsory Treble on Android P (on preoreo phones), just it says its compulsory on Oreo recent-released devices
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] shadowstep:
It's true for Android Oreo and above. Treble is the reason why there are Android P Betas available for non-Google devices. Also, here's an excerpt from this article: "Going forward, updates to phones will become far more common, as all devices that launch with Android Oreo or newer are required to implement Treble." :)
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] Astur_Torque:
Yes I agree with you with that... However... "All devices launched with oreo"... One plus 5 is not one of those... Just 6 and incoming..

Enviado desde mi Oneplus 5 mediante Tapatalk
[OnePlus 5 Questions & Answers] shadowstep:
You're spot on. I never said that OP5/5T will definitely get Treble. Also, I'm not the OP, if you haven't realized that yet. :p OnePlus got away with having to mandatorily provide Treble to the OP5/5T by launching the device with Nougat (but making it upgradeable to Oreo) -- meaning that these devices don't come under the category of devices that launch with Android Oreo, thereby putting OnePlus under no compulsion to provide Treble to these devices. However, there are rumours that have been floating around that even though there is no compulsion, OnePlus is considering providing Treble to these devices.
[Miscellaneous Android Development] M.A.P:
Team Win Recovery Project 3.x.x is a custom recovery built with ease of use and customization in mind. Its a fully touch driven user interface no more volume rocker or power buttons to mash. The GUI is also fully XML driven and completely theme-able. You can change just about every aspect of the look and feel.

[IMG="twrp"]https://img-xda--cdn-com.cdn.amppro...5/19/12427a64-7d85-44ae-a52d-9604e366b6f0.png[/IMG]

Prerequirements:-

1. Your Bootloader must be unlocked. Here is the guide

2. Internal Storage will be wiped.

Bugs:-

1. Battery Percentage stuck at 50%

2. You Guys tell me;)

Instructions:-

1. Go to the fastboot mode.

2. Now paste the recovery in adb folder.

3. Open the cmd by holding shift and press right click in adb folder and then click open command promote here.

4. Now to confirm that device is connected properly type:-

fastboot devices

You'll get your device serial number there.

5. After that type:-

fastboot flash recovery twrp.img

Voil
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] jamesjsenecal:
So if WM6.1 goes official on April 1st, then what does that mean for all the "official" ROMs that are currently available?

The latest images of WM6.1 on http://www.boygeniusreport.com/ shows a kinda slick interface that isn't part of any of the ROMs here. At the same time does anyone know if HTC is going to release a true 6.1 ROM for the Kaiser?

I really liked to cooked ROMs but inquiring minds want to know!
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] kwickone:
That "slick" interface, is for WM6.1 Standard...aka non-touchscreen SmartPhone.
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] Heijdemann:
1 april foolsday don't forget
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III Windows Mobile ROM De] jamesjsenecal:
OK, so it's not for touch-screen. But the basic question still remains - what does an Official WM6.1 mean for the claimed "official" ROM's here?

I really like the cooked ROMs but have had mixed results with all of them. Some have great features, some are really fast, but none of them have been reliably stable. I live and die by email and phone calls, so regardless of what is in a ROM if it is not stable then it's usefullness is limited to me.

I understand that all the current Kaiser WM6.1 ROMS are builds from other devices, just ported over. So will a true Kaiser WM6.1 bring cooked ROMs with better stability and cool features?
[Samsung Galaxy A8+ (2018) Questions & Answers] noob_coder:
Hello lads and buddies. I bought Samsung A8 PLUS with the model number SM-A730F/DS Saudi Arabian version. It's my second Samsung phone since 2013 so I dont exactly remember the whole rooting, unlocking the bootloaders for SAMSUNG PHONES.:confused::( Kindly redirect me to the page or any forum which has a successful BOOTLOADER UNLOCKING & ROOTING SAMSUNG A8 PLUS phones running Android Nougat 7.1.1 as of now.

I will be very appreciative for your support. :cool:
[Samsung Galaxy A8+ (2018) Questions & Answers] ccom2k1:
you have to wait 168 hours without reboot and power off your phone before rooting
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] BlackAxiom:
[ARC3]Breeze+ for J7 2017

You are not allowed to take any part of this rom without my permission, mods included!

Disclaimer

i will not be held responsible for broken sd cards, bricked phones,
damaged hardware etc. you choose to make these modifications
if you point that finger at me, i will laugh at you

Features:

Supports every variant

Liquid Smooth

Pre-rooted with Magisk 16.4

Knox apps removed

Basic Samsung Apps + Google App, Maps, YT & Chrome

Flipboard & Upday briefing removed

FM Radio

Samsung Music

Samsung Theme Support

Custom Kernel Support

May Security Patch

Camera Stickers

A6 2018 Series Wallpapers

Oreo Emojis

Oreo Keyboard

Black Boot anim+Splash for Silver, Gold and Rose Gold models

VoLTE in Nordic Countries

Installation:

Wipe Cache/dalvik, Data & system

Flash latest Breeze+ build

Reboot

Device Automatically reboots, Yes It's Normal

Enjoy

Mods are located in post #2

Downloads:

Old Builds

Breeze+ Builds

Telegram

Credits:

[MENTION=8016879]Dyeide[/MENTION]

[MENTION=4470081]topjohnwu[/MENTION]

Kernel Source:

Based on Stock Rom & Kernel.

XDA:DevDB Information

Breeze+, ROM for the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017)

Contributors

Dyeide

ROM OS Version: 7.x Nougat

ROM Kernel: Linux 3.x

ROM Firmware Required: Nougat

Based On: Samsung Experience 8.1

Version Information

Status: Testing

Current Beta Version: 1.0

Beta Release Date: 2018-06-15

Created 2018-06-15

Last Updated 2018-06-26
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] BlackAxiom:
Screenshots
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] chichareal:
Image?
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] razkal1:
Great work bro! will flash later and report
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] NathyAndrade:
Great, downloading and testing the rom today!
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] skayii:
I used it for a while and its really smooth. I didn`t

found any bugs, but i would love to see this rom without samsung apps like in clean nougat rom. I will install refined kernel and test it. Great job. ( Sorry for my English)
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] BlackAxiom:
I don't own J7 so it's up to you (j7 users) to add them
[Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries] FSadino:
Thread closed due to developer lack of time to continue this project
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] lee480:
Zip: http://bigota.d.miui.com/8.6.14/miui_HMNote5HMNote5ProGlobal_8.6.14_7141e580b7_8.1.zip

zip mirror: http://downloadmirror.co/2CN5/miui_HMNote5HMNote5ProGlobal_8.6.14_7141e580b7_8.1.zip

fastboot: http://bigota.d.miui.com/8.6.14/why...14_20180614.0000.00_8.1_global_0bf3beab44.tgz
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] shirogeek:
Is it chinese rom or truly global one ?

Because i've seen people claiming it's the chinese rom on miui forums
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] atf2m4:
Anyone tested?

Is it Global ROM?

How is the Performance?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] nravin:
It is global ROM.
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] bluvindo:
Unable to install, it says you are allowed to install stable ROM from MIUI Forum.

Please help.
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] lee480:
truly global. comes with gapps built in.
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] kabir2014:
What about bugs n battery life?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] UCFour:
Any new features?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] rick_th1:
Review

Please someone provide a small review, is it usable or buggy...thnks
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] fardeenah:
currently installing
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] nooberko:
How to install betas (is it possible) with locked BL?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] fardeenah:
just installed, it feels smooth. and what i like is that it feels like a real android oreo update with the option to delay notification like stock android. fonts are bigger,animation more refined, it feels a lot like iOS. must test it more
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] Hrishi1834:
Unlock the bootloader, flash twrp and flash the room
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] sumchamp:
Must install over existing MIUI else setup will crash.
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] nooberko:
I was hoping to avoid unlocking for the moment :)
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] ashokmor007:
Here is the Quick Look

[YOUTUBE]rcQHWoYO5V0[/YOUTUBE]

---------- Post added at 12:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:03 PM ----------

[YOUTUBE]rcQHWoYO5V0[/YOUTUBE]
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] KuldeepShivankar:
I'm on 9.5.13 with unlocked bootloader and redwolf twrp recovery. If i flash this miui 10 beta all my setup will be lost?

also do i need to wipe everything except internal storage OR dirty flash would be enough?
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] Faizant82:
Can i install it on Note 5 Ai global??
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] Dhruvansh98:
I didn't wipe anything and it worked fine. Upgraded from 9.5.13. Battery seems to be worse than before.
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro Guides, News, & Discussion] rockuppl:
I don't know but charging is a bit.more faster

On 9.5.13 max it was charging [MENTION=3463510]202[/MENTION]5amps for me

Global beta is getting 2290amps
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] Firebuster:
So I have been trying to get LDAC or apt-X working on my razer phone but it has not worked. I am on the latest stock ROM rooted with magisk (via ADB not TWRP) and with the rayglobe magisk module installed but it just stays on AAC. My headphones are Sony WH-1000XM2 and LDAC was working when using the resurrection remix ROM from the development thread but I had to uninstall the ROM due to instability and no sign of progression. Any help would be appreciated.
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] manor7777:
They locked it down somehow I think. I have 2 threads in here asking for help but no one seems to be able to help me. For added reference, here is the error produced even when all the files are added with root to enable aptx or ldac
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] ClubRaptor:
I installed the magisk aptx&aptxHD module and modified /system/vendor/build.prop then aptx got working.

(I couldn't test with aptxHD or LDAC cos I have no compatibe device with them.)

persist.vendor.bt.a2dp_offload_cap=sbc-aac

to

persist.vendor.bt.a2dp_offload_cap=sbc-aptx-aptXHD

This is the same parameter the magisk module set to /system/build.prop.

To guess, LDAC will may work if an appropriate value set to the prop.
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] Firebuster:
This worked to enable switching to them however now Bluetooth just crashes. I changed it to persist.vendor.bt.a2dp_offload_cap=sbc-aptx-aptxhd-ldac

Edit:

Some interesting notes. I tried a few steps to debugging including readding AAC to the list which did nothing but if I only add aptx then the Bluetooth app no longer crashes however no sound plays so I'm guessing it's the lib files that are not correct? I just used the aptx package in magisk so if there's any other that I'm missing or other suggestions that would be useful
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] manor7777:
I still can't get it to switch to aptx (the one I want) or ldac. It still falls back to SBC usually or aac if I'm on a different speaker. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? I'm on slot a on my device, rooted with magisk and I have tried multiple aptx modules. Is there a specific build.prop editor you use? Both my speakers and headphones support it and work with other devices and I'm still getting the error I replied with above (page one)

I'm an experienced rooter, so don't be afraid to fully explain any steps I may be missing out!
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] Firebuster:
I used root explorer and changed the build.prop entries in system\vendor\. In the first place I used the root essentials build.prop editor which shows a different build.prop. other than that I literally just edited that line and that allowed me to change it. I can't think of anything else I did other than install a bunch of library files which I'm guessing you found the same ones as me because it was very limited on what was available and up to date
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] manor7777:
OK, awesome. You rock. That got it to select aptx - now my 2nd problem, no audio! I can see in dev options and bt settings that it's showing aptx, but I get no audio (well, I get an almost click click click noise) then my Bluetooth adaptor for my headphones crashes. And it forces my headphones to turn off. I tried 3 different magisk modules for the library files, any ideas - I was getting SBC audio before
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] Firebuster:
Sounds like the same problem I am having. Aptx doesn't work and aptx HD and LDAC just crash Bluetooth. Genuinely have no idea where to go from here. It must be a driver or library file. Real shame it's not working.
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] manor7777:
Edit: seems to be looping these messages in catlog
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] manor7777:
OK, so last night and this morning I have been just messing with things. I no longer crash my headphones and force them to turn off, but I still have no audio over aptx - though at least it's not crashing my headphones (Bluetooth in the phone was always OK). There is one error I'm getting and I'm not sure if its related of not, but is to do with a buffer failing to release. See my screenshots of logs (just documenting here for reference)
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] hatemosphere:
so basically i went your path a few days ago and dropped that idea. please post updates if you manage to get aptx\aptx hd\ldac working (Razer Phone + Sony WH-1000 XM2)
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] manor7777:
Cc [MENTION=7931646]Firebuster[/MENTION]

So, I might be an experienced rooter (no 1 click toolkits here) I am NOT a developer. I've tried a combination of a bunch of things to try and get this to work, and nothing has!

I did however get it to work by installing a GSI (basically a rom) to the device, but even that was painful to get working (well, installed). Now running AOSP 8.1 GSI w/gapps and I flashed magisk for root. I then installed the Aptx magisk module from the built in repo and it works perfectly fine. Not sure if It's something in razer software as I'm technically more up to date now so it's not like I was using the wrong drivers.

Can't find a decent dolby atmos I can install that will work along side v4a, all the magisk modules are for android 7 or 6.

Otherwise that's the only way I have found so far, sorry guys! - benefit is, other than AOSP's ****ty camera app (use the gcam port instead), literally everything works fine, and I even get stronger vibration on a GSI
[Razer Phone Questions & Answers] Firebuster:
Yeah I might move onto that too. To try to fix the Bluetooth issues. I can only assume razer excluded some of the functionality but since it's baked into android 8 I don't see why they would remove it.