yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
Once huawei used gps from broadcom.

It changed with the new kirin 980.

This kirin 980 has an integrated dual gps proprietary huawei gps.

So huawei created his own gps chip.

For 100% huawei mate 20 and mate 20 pro

no longer has a gps chip from broadcom.

It is possible that the dual gps from huawei is better

than from broadcom.

It is possible that it also has Russian and Chinese.

Better means that there should be no problems

with dual gps.

Because huawei does not have to rely

on an external broadcom provider including drivers

android.

Because there were some problems with gps dual broadcom in xiaomi mi8
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] lneam:
Hi,

1. several Huawei phones have already supported Galileo with BCM4774, including the P10 and P10 Plus, as well as the Mate 9 and Mate 9 Pro. Previous years, how do you thing Huawei devices with Kirin SoC was able to receive GNSS satellites ?

2. where did you find this info ? (proprietary huawei gps)

3. about Huawei mate 20

if it is able to support dual frequency GNSS signals, this is something for us (enthusiasts) to found measurements. And of course, not only to see L1 and L2 signals, but also accuracy of "cm" (bellow 1m). Until then, I will stay away ...
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
I watched the presentations of the kirin 980 processor.

They assured me that huawei was built for the first time

your own dual gps chip in kirin 980.

The accuracy of the gps chip in kirin 980

it's 10x more accurate.

So probably about 30cm galileo.

The Kirin 970 did not have a huawei gps chip.

Better than the broadcom because it can support

l5 gps beidou.

It may be a blockage of geolocation.

So the lack of l5 beidou outside of China.

Unless the change in gps.conf files will help.

Since huawei is a Chinese company it would be

terribly strange that it does not support l5 gps beidou
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] lneam:
Hi,

1. about 30cm accuracy - 10x more accurate

Yes, 30cm x 10 = 300cm = 3m . This is what we see into devices with only L1 signals. Not only smartphones, but also outdoors PND, like Garmin company.

2. I saw into youtube the follow video from Huawei "Meet the #HUAWEIMate20"

from 24:14 - 26:14 we can see the presentation of GNSS capabilities.

- the test has to record a track, with Nike+ Run Club application, using 4G (GSM modem / AGPS) and GNSS receiver (all together).

for me, if we want to test the GNSS receiver capabilities, we must have the device into the AirPlane mode. About software, maybe Locus Maps or Orux Maps, into track recording mode. This must be the right test.

But this only my personal opinion.

3. about Beidou L5

Into the previews video, there was not any report about dual Beidou frequency.

Beidou has only E1, E2, E3. We can see GNSS web page into wikipedia about all the systems specs.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Tel864:
FWIW, I've had two Huawei phones and if that's what it takes for GPS then I wouldn't have GPS. I guess either Samsung tried to save a little cash on the S9 or their engineering was set when the Broadcom BCM47755 was announced. I guess it's also a country thing as I get phenomenal GPS readings inside or out.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] avril.jil:
The MI mix 3 also lunched with dual band gps. We have 5 phones now.mate 20, Mate 20 pro, mate 20x, mi8 and mi mix 3. Who's gonna win the accuracy race?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] lneam:
No, we have 6 phones / devices

You forget Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] sjbarbeau:
One item of note for anyone testing in the U.S. - currently U.S. devices don't use Galileo satellites, although it looks like that could change as soon as November 15th:

https://medium.com/@sjbarbeau/where-is-the-world-is-galileo-6bb7bfa29e

According to http://qzss.go.jp/en/technical/satellites/index.html, there are 17 Galileo satellites broadcasting E5a signals, and only 12 GPS satellites broadcasting on L5.

So if you're in the U.S. and trying to evaluate dual-frequency receiver accuracy, you're missing out not only on the Galileo E5a signals, but also the Galileo E1 signals. Someone using the exact same phone model in Europe will have a significantly better accuracy experience.

As mentioned above, hopefully this changes soon when the FCC approves the use of Galileo in the U.S., although it's still not clear to me the exact technical process that needs to happen to remove Galileo filtering on devices in the U.S.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Langenator:
I am confused about the bit where someone flew from Europe to the US and lost the satellites they previously could see.

I am in the US with a 965F and I can see GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo satellites. Did this person have a US device? Is it a software limitation?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] sjbarbeau:
This user had a Nokia 6.1 (2018), the U.S. model TA 1045. If you have an international model device it may not have the same restrictions that filter out Galileo. I'm not yet sure of the exact technical mechanism by which the Galileo filtering is done. My current guess is that it's done in a geofencing protocol over SUPL, which means Galileo could be activated remotely without requiring a firmware update. I'll post more when I find out.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] dinamito:
[MENTION=9029253]sjbarbeau[/MENTION]

Greetings. I have a rooted S9 with latest firmware - BRJ6. I tried to edit gps.xml from your extremely interesting article on medium.com. Anyway, the only result from that was, that GPS test apps couldn't see any satellites at all( I guess they couldn't read the raw data anymore), but Google Maps was working fine.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] sjbarbeau:
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 announced yesterday (Dec 5th) supports dual-frequency GNSS!

https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon-855-mobile-platform

This is huge news for the U.S., Latin America, Chinese, and Japanese markets, as presumably this means those variants of the Galaxy S10 family and other flagship devices using the Snapdragon 855 will support dual-frequency going forward!

I've updated my dual-frequency GNSS article to include this:

https://medium.com/@sjbarbeau/dual-frequency-gnss-on-android-devices-152b8826e1c
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
Satellite Systems Support: Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
I have downloaded the Mate 20 X firmware image

EVR_AL00B_BD_1.0.0.30_9.0.0_r3_EMUI9.0.0_05022LPM.zip,

unzipped and mounted its vendor.img dump.

/vendor/etc/gps4775config.xml has the same content as on Mi 8:

<gll
...
MultiCarrLnaMask="L1_EXT_ON|L5_EXT_ON"
MultiCarrRFMode ="GL_MULTI_CARR_RF_MODE_L1_L5"
GpsCarrierType="3,1,3,1,2,3,2,3,3,3,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,3,3,3,3,1,2,3,2,3"
ExtL5Bias="13.5"
...
<gll_features
EnableLowPowerEls="false"
EnableLowPowerPmm="false"
EnableOnChipMiCtrl="true"
EnableInternalBlanking="true"
EnableGalileo="true"
/>

The /vendor/bin/glgpsd4775 is a pretty fresh version:

@(#)Broadcom GLL ver. 96.20.22 354453, Oct 6 2018, 22:32:21, sardine://depot/client/core/rel/Huawei/20.CLU3.CLL5.4_96.20.22.336581/...

It seems that you can also EnableGalSv14_18="true" in <gll_features>.

Do you have any credible evidence that BCM4775 is not being used on Mate 20 X ?

PS. I have checked the Mate 20 Pro firmware update now, and it has exactly the same GPS software setup as Mate 20 X.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] PMPaul:
One more phone added - Honor V20. But still no 30 cm accuracy evidence. Seems to me somebody fool us...
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] avril.jil:
I think so, till now I can't buy none of these dual gnss smartphones coz no evidence of 30 cm yet
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] aygul12345:
Huawei mate 20 pro,

Still NO support .153 build
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] aygul12345:
. 171 is out, waiting to confirm
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] avril.jil:
What do you mean?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] aygul12345:
Firmware is out, waiting to test if it available the CT GPS status.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] ppaajjaa:
Is the BCM47752 in Samsung S9 pin compatible with BCM47755 ? I'm wondering if it's possible to replace the chip physically in the S9 to achieve the dual band GPS there :)
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
xiaomi mi9 has dual gps

Possible from samsung galaxy s10 exynos

also has dual gps.

GPS with aGPS, GLONASS, BeiDou,QZSS,Galileo, Dual-frequency GNSS

https://www.yugatech.com/mobile/sam...s10-vs-s10e-specs-comparison-whats-different/
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
P30 and P30 pro has dual gps
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
Good news.

Emui 9.1 with huawei p30 pro.

Has full dual gps-l1 and l5 support.

Gpstest already detects l5.

Now we are waiting for emui 9.1 for mate 20 / mate 20 pro/ honor view20
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] PMPaul:
Super !

Does anybody has P30 Pro and can make real tests ?

Also what about Huawei P30 (not Pro) - does it support L5 ?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
The emui 9.1 system has patches

and that's why l5 is already visible in the application

gpstest from google play.

P30 also has emui 9.1.

review p30 pro

https://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-Huawei-P30-Pro-Smartphone.415196.0.html

Kommunikation und GPS - Starke Ortungseigenschaften
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
Oppo Reno 10x hybrid zoom version uses dual-frequency GPS.

Today, OPPO’s Vice President, Shen Yiren, discussed a few details about the OPPO Reno series. Shen Yiren said on Weibo: “The 10x hybrid zoom version uses dual-frequency GPS.” The dual-frequency GPS function provides more accurate positioning. Another Chinese manufacturer, Xiaomi, was the first to apply the technology to mobile phones. The Xiaomi Mi 8 supports L1+L5 dual-frequency positioning and its accuracy is at least 3-5 times better. It is more resistant to multipath and reflected signals in urban scenes and has higher immunity to interference.

https://www.gizchina.com/2019/04/04/oppo-reno-10x-hybrid-zoom-version-uses-dual-frequency-gps/
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
The Xiaomi Mi9 is NOT using BCM47755, but a built-in Qualcomm GPS !

I don't know if it is better or worse than Broadcom, but it is a new and different chipset.

It is L1/L5/E1/E5a capable, but the GPStest "CF" output is completely F*d up ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] sjbarbeau:
I think you're talking about the Galileo CF of 1561.098 as shown here, right?

https://medium.com/@papylepian/mi-9-9140f7db50da

Has anyone gotten feedback from Xiaomi on this?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
It can be also 1602.000 for Galileo, or show 'L1' for GPS L5 (so you will see the same GPS satellite twice as 'L1').

I will seek for the replacement by Mi8 Pro.

In general stay away from Mi9 for high accuracy GPS purposes, because Qualcomm chipsets do not provide carrier phase data!!!
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] jclm73:
My screenshot on my Huawei P30 PRO with L5 and E5a

Envoyé de mon VOG-L29 en utilisant Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Mpidemie:
2 months old article about Galileo being approved in the US. Hopefully that'll lead to more manufacturers releasing software updates for their dual frequency capable devices soon.

https://galileognss.eu/gnss-chip-manufacturers-expect-big-galileo-roll-out-in-u-s/
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] ZXR:
The Galaxy Note 10 also uses the BCM47752KUB1G (listed in its sensorhub selftest) and has dual-frequency support (can be seen in the GPSTest CF values), so there is no need to replace the chip.

Currently I would not say there is an Improvement of accruracy compared to single-frequency devices.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] kriss3:
I have a question.

Redmi note 9s has snapdragon 720g.

Which supports dual gps.

Unfortunately on stock miui and

European Miui newest

Gpstest does not detect dual gps or galileo.

There are only l1 gps, glonass and Chinese.

I have root.

What to change in gps.conf to make it galileo and dual gps?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] equatorius:
Maybe this is a better topic to ask if anybody has an idea why I can't see any Galileo satellites on my G960F/DS while inside the EU?

Details: https://xdaforums.com/t/noble-rom-3...960f-fd-n-sm-g96xf-fd-n.4253997/post-89142598
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] ZXR:
My G950F on A9 can see Galileo, but far less satellites then other devices.

Have you tried it outside and waited a bit?

Have you updated your A-GPS data?

Btw., I realized in "GPSTest" 2004 is shown, but in "GPS Test" 2023.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] equatorius:
I wasn't constantly obsessed with this after the initial post-purchase examinations but I have never seen Glonass on this phone. I previously had a Snapdragon-based S8 and I remember that picking up more satellites (it was better overall in everything compared to the Exynos-based S8). [That was a year when I dropped/broke or "lost"/gave-up-to-thief a few phones in a row. That's part of the reason I kept buying used ones. My luck is better nowadays but I hate the new BIG tabletphones. I think somebody at Big Tech has to smoke some designer drug and reinvent the wheel... I mean the pocket-friendly premium-call smartphone. Some like a new Stev Jobs wannabee presenting the next great achievement in cutting-edge tech that revolutionizes how you can carry your smartphone comfortably in your pocket NOW ... klhhmm... AGAIN...]

This phone had its battery replaced once (right before I bought it as "refurbished"). Could it be that the technician messed something up and damaged the antenna...? Is it mechanically sensitive? It also sees a lot less Glonass satellites compared to GPS ones (barely enough for a 3D fix). I checked a family member's Huawei P Smart 2019 and that picked up more satellites than my S9 (and duty-cycling can't be turned off on that Huawei).

Yes, I tried purging and re-injecting the AGS data (including time but I guess it injects GPS time rather than UTC, so the epoch bug persists inside the chipset logic, or the injection silently fails).

It was raining all day here while I tried playing with GPS but I placed the phone in the attic (wood walls, wood ceiling and only some tiles above that - it's one of the tallest buildings around, so it's a fairly great spot as far as indoor spots go). No Galileo satellites popped up during the 40-minute-long GNSSLogger run. And the analyzer tool practically discarded the Glonass measurements as well.

I figured I should swap to a second-hand Pixel 4 at a negligible extra cost. But it's still surprisingly expensive. Probably because very few can be found for sale compared to other variants like the 4 XL, 4a, etc. Either very few were made or I am not alone with a preference for "old-fashioned premium" phones.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] white7561:
Umm. I saw it on the GPS.xml itself on the s9+ fw lol
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Cyris:
In your capture, that was showing 4755... which wasn’t 4775 :(
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
The 4755 (RfType="GL_RF_4755_BRCM_EXT_LNA") was referring to the BRCM_EXT_LNA used on S9:

GL_RF_2076_BRCM_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_BARRACUDA_BRCM_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_4751_DANUBE_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_47511_BRCM_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_4752_BRCM_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_47521_BRCM_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_4753_BRCM_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_47531_BRCM_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_47520_BRCM_EXT_LNA
GL_RF_4755_BRCM_EXT_LNA

Compare that to S8(+)

RfType="GL_RF_47531_BRCM_EXT_LNA"

S9 uses a newer chip.

The Samsung GPSD is also a modern version, supporting 4775 variants:

make-pike:://depot/client/core/rel/Samsung/Star/20.22.310750/v10/proprietary/deliverables/esw3_dev:4775_B0@316421_4775_B0
make-pike:://depot/client/core/rel/Samsung/Star/20.22.310750/v10/proprietary/deliverables/esw3_dev:4775_FF@316421_4775_FF
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] buckyswider@comcast.net:
For what it's worth (not much, I suppose) this article refers to it as the BCM4755. All the others I've seen (including Broadcom themselves!) call it the 47755.

https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/09/...rate-gps-chip-arriving-smartphones-next-year/

---------- Post added at 11:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:25 AM ----------

For what it's worth (not much, I suppose) this article refers to it as the BCM4755. All the others I've seen (including Broadcom themselves!) call it the 47755.

https://www.gizmochina.com/2017/09/...rate-gps-chip-arriving-smartphones-next-year/
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
BCM47755 is a "GNSS Location Hub"

https://docs.broadcom.com/docs/12379501

which includes ARM Cortex-M4F and Cortex-M0 CPUs, DSP,

50 GPIOs, 2ADCs, 3 SPI ports, 4 UARTs, 4 I2C ports +

"Integrated multi-frequency GNSS baseband and RF frontend",

also known as "GPS receiver".

GL_RF_4755_BRCM_EXT_LNA refers only to such

"Integrated multi-frequency GNSS baseband and RF frontend".

It is similar to the Samsung Galaxy S8 which has BCM4774 "GNSS Location Hub",

which includes GL_RF_47531_BRCM_EXT_LNA: "Integrated single-frequency GNSS baseband and RF frontend".
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] SydneyBlue120d:
Officially confirmed to be

Broadcom BCM47752 GNSS Receiver

Does this chip support the L5 signal?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] white7561:
I confirmed this days ago from the leaked firmware lol. And yeah. It should be. If you read a few posts up. I said Samsung disabled it. It seems like. Since the accuracy is still the same and also. The configuration said it's only on L1 AFAIK
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
On the chip level - yes. Now we need somebody with the rooted phone

to edit /vendor/etc/gps.xml (to addi L5 support).

It will not necessarily provide you centimeter accuracy (because of bad/nonexistent

dedicated antenna for L5, buggy DSP firmware, buggy gpsd <- nothing unusual with Broadcom).
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] SydneyBlue120d:
The fact that Galileo is disabled too make me think it is just a matter of time :)

I wonder if Galileo is disabled in the Snapdragon version too?

I suspect it is not :)
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
Why do you think it is disabled ?

<gll_features
EnableLowPowerPmm="true"
EnableBeidou="true"
EnableGalileo="true"
EnableACSD="false"
/>

My question was about the output of "Galileo Navigation Message" raw frames.

This does not work on BCM4774 devices, and it is just buggy Broadcom software.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] SydneyBlue120d:
I do not know if it disabled or it is simply not working, however at the moment the reality is in the Exynos versione Galileo doesn't work.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] white7561:
Lol. I'm using the note 8 and Galileo is working fine [emoji23]

Ps: I'm using the exynos version
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] SydneyBlue120d:
Yes, I know it works in Note 8, but at the moment it doesn't in S9/S9+.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
It is hard to debug this problem without being able to edit gps.xml and gps.conf

I suspect that you do not get the current LTO data.

"Standalone" Galileo is also not working properly on BCM4774,

even on the officially approved devices. Say "thank you" to Broadcom for their buggy software ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] buckyswider@comcast.net:
Hmmm...so are saying that the Note 8 uses dual-frequency and as such you get ~10CM accuracy??
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] white7561:
He's talking about Galileo [emoji23]
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Curious1Person:
It was advertised that the BCM47755 is the chips which support L5, How can we confirm the BCM47752 that is used in S9 support L5? Even though it is in the same family (BCM4775x) why it didn't got advertised too for supporting the L5?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] white7561:
The config suggests that it should supports it. It's disabled tho
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
We know that modification '5' means 'host assisted search and positioning receiver' and modification '8' means 'fully autonomous receiver' (so the differences are only in the Cortex-M4F firmware). There is no information about '2' and '4'. Maybe '2' means 'crippled for Samsung to not really support L5', but this is unlikely ;) The only way to test BCM47752 is to edit gps.xml by enabling L5 and extended gpsd logging, and analyse the logfiles.
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
Dual-frequency means simultaneous use of L1 and L5 bands. Galileo E1/E5 uses exactly the same frequencies (the difference to GPS is in the signal encoding algorithm).
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] SydneyBlue120d:
Yes, exactly :D
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] buckyswider@comcast.net:
SO: Once I get my phone I should root, then edit the gpx.xml, then install gnsslogger to see if there's any L5 messages? Can this be done without a SIM/activation? (it's a company-paid phone, and I'll have to keep my S7 activated while doing this, since prior to moving the SIM I'll have to factory init in order to install all my company's managed stuff, which won't work on a rooted phone).
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
You can always operate a phone without a SIM card as a classic PDA.

The lto2.dat should be put here (together with 'date +%s > ltoStatus.dat')

LtoDir="/data/system/gps/"

the logfiles can be found here

LogEnabled="true"
Log="FILE"
LogDirectory="/storage/emulated/0/gps/broadcom/storage"

There are some new config options to be investigated:

GldumpLoggingEnable
GldumpLogEnabled
GldumpLogDirectory

and maybe the gnsslogger code is already included into gpsd

[AndroidGnssLogger]#[AndroidGnssLoggerNL]
[AndroidGnssLogger]# Header Description:[AndroidGnssLoggerNL]
[AndroidGnssLogger]# Version: 1.4.0.0, Platform: N[AndroidGnssLoggerNL]
[AndroidGnssLogger]# Raw,ElapsedRealtimeMillis,TimeNanos,LeapSecond,TimeUncertaintyNanos,FullBiasNanos,
[AndroidGnssLogger]BiasNanos,BiasUncertaintyNanos,DriftNanosPerSecond,DriftUncertaintyNanosPerSecond,
[AndroidGnssLogger]HardwareClockDiscontinuityCount, Svid,TimeOffsetNanos,State,ReceivedSvTimeNanos,
[AndroidGnssLogger]ReceivedSvTimeUncertaintyNanos,Cn0DbHz,PseudorangeRateMetersPerSecond,
[AndroidGnssLogger]PseudorangeRateUncertaintyMetersPerSecond,
[AndroidGnssLogger]AccumulatedDeltaRangeState,AccumulatedDeltaRangeMeters,
[AndroidGnssLogger]AccumulatedDeltaRangeUncertaintyMeters,CarrierFrequencyHz,CarrierCycles,
[AndroidGnssLogger]CarrierPhase,CarrierPhaseUncertainty,MultipathIndicator,SnrInDb,
[AndroidGnssLogger]ConstellationType[AndroidGnssLoggerNL]
[AndroidGnssLogger]# Fix,Provider,Latitude,Longitude,Altitude,Speed,Accuracy,(UTC)TimeInMs[AndroidGnssLoggerNL]
[AndroidGnssLogger]# Nav,Svid,Type,Status,MessageId,Sub-messageId,Data(Bytes)[AndroidGnssLoggerNL]
[AndroidGnssLogger]Raw,%lu,%s,%s,%s,
[AndroidGnssLogger]%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%lu,
[AndroidGnssLogger]%hu,%.17lG,%lu,%s,%s,%.17lG,%.17lG,%.17lG,
[AndroidGnssLogger]%hu,%.17lG,%.17lG,%s,,,,
[AndroidGnssLogger]%hu,,%hu[AndroidGnssLoggerNL]
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] buckyswider@comcast.net:
S9+ will arrive tomorrow....Well THAT was unexpected! I guess I have to wait until someone develops a rootkit for the device? (If they haven't already?)
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] cr2:
I think it should be possible to push modified gps.xml as a configuration update

through the public java GNSS API, and also set the SD card as a log directory.

Then you don't need root access (should do some android programming instead).
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] buckyswider@comcast.net:
It's here!

Now what :)
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] bamdroid1234:
How does the GPS seem?
[Samsung Galaxy S9  Questions & Answers] Cholek3:
Seems more accurate to me anyway (compared to S7).