yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Any new??? Are you working on a solution????
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] :
No. Samsung was not used Snapdragon chipset on the n7105. If you don't trust to me you can Google the n7105 specs.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
not the final update 5 build yet. but this should fix the issues

*You can now download from the link in the first post
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Same problem dude, when turning the screen off it doesn't turn on again i must hold the power button to restart the phone ?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
how about this?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Valkyrie146:
Fixed thanks so much
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Emo Darkemotion:
Sometimes screen unlock work sometimes doesn't

And one more thing

Ac charge current should be 1800 ma by default + ignore unstable power
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Solved thanks so much ?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Everything is working perfectly ?✌️?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
with the latest version i haven't got any issues so far. it seems at least the reboot on standby issue is fixed, as it happened constantly. on the other hand, the B(lack)SOD on wake might be harder to catch, i'll keep on testing
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] ComicoX:
Thanks [MENTION=7427799]pascua28[/MENTION] work's like a charm. This is the best kernel for N7100
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Did you get any SODs without undervolting anything so far?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
What do you mean? Does your screen stay black when you try to press power or home button?

1800mA + ignore unstable power is not generally recommended
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
...

---------- Post added at 02:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:08 PM ----------

currently i'm slightly undervolt-ed both gpu and cpu. i'm on zzmove battery plus with a maximum speed of 800 and normal multicore saving enabled. sorry for the derp double post before. the forum kinda delayed my earlier post, it didn't appear
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Etsyo:
I've encountered the "holding the power button down to restart to phone because it won't wake up" problem once and also some random reboots. Other than that this build is rock solid. Waiting for "more" stable builds. Thanks for your hard work man! :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
All these problems have been solved in the last build :"n7100 2"
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Etsyo:
I've encountered the famous "can't wake up the phone so I had to hold down the power button to make it restart" problem and a couple random reboots. Other than these, all is fine. I'm impatiently waiting for the next build man you should keep this good work up!! :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Dude everything is working in the last build
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Emo Darkemotion:
First

thanks for this awesome kernel

Yeah stay black sometimes auto reboot

I am using pegasus governor at 1800 MHz

Latest build Lineageos 14.1 tilak

I don't know about 1600 MHz

Testing now at 1600mhz
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] cristobalite1983:
What do you mean by maximum speed 800?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
there's no need to go full throttle all the time as most of the stuff and games i play go fine and the phone remains cooler more, i go 1600 only when i must run more demanding stuff
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] hishamnoobie:
1800 Mhz is unstable in all kernels.

Dont use it
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] cristobalite1983:
You've outdone yourself by finally fixing the video problems even without a note 2. Thanks for giving us a stable kernel to use with nougat roms. You're the man. No reboots whatsoever or black screen after screen locks. Everything is working fine for m. Thanks
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] ReDLyNx22:
He's talking about charging rate :eek: .... Pay attention what you read xD
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
Hello guys, just 2 question:

I have flashed the kernel a moment ago, what app I have to use to menage it? I thouth it was included in the zip.

I have noticed that when i plug phone to charge, it says slow charge in lock screen, is it normal?

Thanks
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] :
Boeffla Config app.

Slow charging bug is common problem in our note 2. But don't worry it doesn't effect to the charging speed. It is only text.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] h_maharaj:
Boeffla config app. http://kernel.boeffla.de/bcv2/
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
here https://www.boeffla.de/index.php/downloads/boeffla-config-app run it and follow the notes onscreen to ensure it'll run properly. also, delete any other kernel config app. this is all you need.

as for the charging, this phone doesn't support fast charging. there are options to tweak it a bit but it's not safe
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Hey guys which configuration are you using and how is sot with you?? I want a configuration to make my battery last longer without making the phone lag any suggestions?? Thanks
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
If you have experienced random reboots with the latest build, please don't report it here if you overclocked or undervolted your phone. Only report random reboots if you didn't overclock or undervolt.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Skull97:
Actually, you were the one who should pay attention, there's quite a lot of different between mAh and Mhz.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] ReDLyNx22:
yup, kinda sleepy... read an old post mentioning 1800 mA and ignore unstable charge. Sorry : (

---------- Post added at 01:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:47 AM ----------

yup, kinda sleepy.... Read something about 1800 mA charge rate and ignore unstable charge... Sorry : (
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Please test so I can now move this file to mediafire and move on to update 6
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Emo Darkemotion:
Previous version beta2 was not good for me even at stock setting

But this one seems to be very stable everything is working fine here thank you
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Hi guys! New build is up! Check the download link on the first post
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Build is only for N7100.

I might try building for N7105 also
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
Thank u guys for the help, i have installed the config app and everything is good for now, no bugs and device much more fast.

Really love this.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Could somebody download safetynet checker from play store and then post the safetynet results here
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Emo Darkemotion:
This is build n71003.zip test

I am currently on previous build n71003.zip + latest magisk stable

Downloading

Will report soon.

update5 stable:-failed
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
I use Isu as root method and it can pass safetynet but only if you disable SU and set selinux to enforcing.

If you active SU and selinux permissive, you cant pass.

I'll provide screen when I can if you need

Edit: Here they are, first screen is SU enabled and SELinux Permissive, second is SU disabled and SELinux Enforcing
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Magisk works better. Just set selinux to enforcing

Edit: Magisk hide works with tjis kernel
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
Latest kernel release seems working even better!

I never managed to pass safety net once on custom roms

I should dig more

Magisk used to work like crap on our device with constant issues and wake up bsod

Is it different now?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] h_maharaj:
MagiskHide works fine but SafetyNet still doesn't pass with Magisk. However SafetyNet does pass with LineageSu and iSu. I'm currently trying with Magisk but SafetyNet (both basic integrity and CTS) fails. I've even mirrored the prop changes that iSu makes using setprop and resetprop, confirmed these changes with getprop, changed SeLinux to Enforcing and disabled ADB debugging but still no luck.

If anyone can get SafetyNet to pass with Magisk, please share your steps.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
I get SafetyNet to pass with lineage root and SafetyNet maybe not working with you if you use xposed
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Using lineage root and boeffla last version update 5 stable, Colt Os Rom by santosh
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
Wtf. I dont think so.

I had a lot of problems with magisk, and even when installed correctly it could not pass safetynet for me.

Isu is easy, just flash and with one click you pass safetynet.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Set selinux to enforcing
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] h_maharaj:
I don't use Xposed. I also get SafetyNet to pass using LineageSu+iSu but not with Magisk.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] h_maharaj:
Did that. Still doesn't pass with Magisk but does with iSu.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
Probably magisk now can pass and is easier than before, i dont use it since a lot becouse im going good with Isu and had a lot of problem with the first builds.

Flash error, random crash and reboot and cant pass safetynet.

Btw, for now no problem at all using Isu
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] waihung0626:
thank you very much, Sir.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Skull97:
No idea why you guys can't pass safety net with magisk, but with this kernel, I always able to do so. What I did was: Flash kernel -> reboot -> flash magisk -> reboot again -> Done. You may need to open magisk manager at least one though.

No problem :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] h_maharaj:
Okay guys, some good news. I was finally able to get SN to pass as well as the device to show as certified in the Play Store. There is no need to make any additional prop changes nor change Selinux to Enforcing as Magisk hides the Permissive state. This is what I did:

Removed my Google account and cleared cache and data of play store and play services.

Rebooted to recovery and wiped cache, dalvik and system.

Re flashed rom, kernel, Magisk and Gapps. Wiped cache and dalvik and rebooted to system. Readded my Google account and that was it.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Androbots:
Hey [MENTION=7427799]pascua28[/MENTION] is the delayed screen wakeup caused by the kernel?

---------- Post added at 02:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:01 PM ----------

Android pay should work now..
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
All nougat roms i've tried have 1-2 se delay on screen wakeup, it's not kernel fault.

I'm on Tilak's Lineage and had this delay also with stock kernel.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mzj4213:
Anyone on CrDroid here?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
interesting, i've unrooted completely using the inbuilt uninstaller in supersu, cleaned googleplay data, flashed stable magisk and the kernel again. and i'm able to pass safetynet, kewl!

and also, magisk's xposed module can be installed. safetynet passes if you disable xposed from the magisk manager and reboot.

afaik resurrection remix was supposed to be quite troublesome with safetynet but it seems it's working great, i'm quite satisfied!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
I will speed it up on the next update
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Thanks bro for your fantastic work
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] ishtiak02:
No swap/zram support ? Or am I missing something ?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Emo Darkemotion:
Wow AWESOME bro :good:

THANK YOU
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
I'm testing some undervolt/downclock settings.

For now i'm not able to go over -25 downvolt in both Cpu/Gpu for having a good stability.

Anyone have some good settings to share? I'm trying to have a bit more battery life without lose a lot of performance.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Whirlinurd:
Also doing the same thing just about now. I can not get it to be stable even at -25mv. With the Agni kernel it was possible to get -50mv and it was stable with no reboots. Maybe the stock voltages are different. That is surely a possibility but I don't think they differ that much. Maybe stock voltages are fine. Find it a bit slow overall with ZZMoove governor and the battery profile Battery yank. This setting was overall faster with Agni in combination with Android KitKat or Marshmallow.

I can say that the following are wrong first starting the Boeffla Config app:

- The CPU Min Frequency should be at 200 and not at 100. I believe this could cause instability when in deep sleep or standby.

- Maybe other things... add them here when I see them...

I will try some different profiles and will see how it goes but I believe ZZMoove is mostly recommended for the best balance but when it is set too heavy stuttering and lagginess can occur.

For testing performance against battery I am using the PegasusQ governor for now with the Boeffla Battery Saving profile. Never used that one before. Will see how that goes this monday when I am at work to give it a general use and standby test against what I was used to have. I would like to still reach a -25mv undervolt also but it seems to be not possible for me right now with this current release of the kernel. If these thing are related to the current release of the kernel maybe it will be possible to optimize these sections for every device so they will be more stable at an undervolt.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
for a couple of days i'm like this:

zzmove battery plus @ 100-800 no undervolt, multicore normal powersaving activated

gpu 166-266 no undervolt

cfq for both internal external sdcard (row is extremely slow and cripling!)

it's all battery savy and it's fast!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
I was also testing ZZMoove, it seems to drain a little less in standby, but seems also a little bit more laggy to use, have to test with different profile.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] cristobalite1983:
I experience delay in wake up when calls come in only. Other than that the phone comes on normally for m. I'm using Resurrection remix rom. I believe this slow wake up is typical of nougat roms as I have used all 3 for note 2. Tilak, RR, and Crdroid as well.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Bastion46:
Are you sure about AC charging that should be at 1800?

I really dont want to waste another battery :angel:
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Whirlinurd:
With a good 2 amp charger and quality it should be fine at 1800. If you do not change the ignore unstable power setting and leave it on default the charging circuit will still take the highest possible charging current even if it is set to 1800. I am sure with good hardware that the note 2 is rated this high. It is also correct that it is worse for your battery. They will degrade faster. More heat is bad for batteries. But it is possible if you want to. Just leave it on default otherwise and if your charging is very low consider changing your charger and cables can also go bad. I think shorter and thicker cables give a more stable charge. Just go for quality and do not go for a expensive charger and or cable. They are sometimes also crap.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Then i must set 1800 ma and ignore unstable power on??

I have set these settings is this safe??
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
maybe i'm wrong but i don't see the reason in endanger the battery life if not more.. to save what? some minutes of charging speed?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Whirlinurd:
Everybody is absolutely right. If you do not want to shorten your battery life cycle then leave it where you are comfortable with. Mine is set at 1800ma max and when charging now it draws only 800ma with my crappy long cable and the phone is at 90% battery charge. It depends how empty the battery is on how much it will charge from the start. At around 90% I think it will go into trickle charge mode. I only said that the note 2 is capable of a max current draw of 1800ma. I think I was wrong about the max current. I checked it and it is a little bit lower at 1700ma. I have used these settings with my original battery for about 4 years before it died. Now I am using a chinese battery and it works fine. I have ordered five batteries including a original one and only the one I am using now works the best. The original one was resetting my phone when I got it. The other ones didn't hold the charge that they claimed. Like that they were 3200-3500 or even 4400 batteries but only were 2000-2500 capacity. Two already were slightly bloated and they spinned on a flat service so they probably already going bad. Could also be the reason why they didn't discharge properly but I digress.

Just to summon it up:

- I repeat I was wrong. The stock max charging current is 1700. Default safety margin of 100ma.

- Lower charging is better but takes longer.

- Higher charging generates more heat which is bad.

- Use good stable charger and cable.

- Charging circuit of phone is smart to control max capable current draw.

- Batteries have protection against overcharge.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
1800 ma is good and safe??

And what did ignore unstable power do??

And i use 1800 ma and ignore unstable power on are these safe and good??
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Whirlinurd:
Hi.

Yes. 1700 ma as stock or 1800 ma when ignoring the safety margin should be perfectly safe. Normally when charging it jumps around too much it lowers the draw until it stabilizes and stays the same. This is the final draw it stays at and it really is charging at this rate. What ignoring unstable power does is trying to reach the max draw of 1700ma again but it ignores the negotiations with the charging circuit that it is better to drop to be more stable and will keep asking for the highest draw no matter what. Maybe the current is fluctuating more this way and it gives stress on the phone. I never had problems using this setting and do not know what can go wrong but lets say it is an expert setting and only use it at your own risk. In my case it gives faster charging when I need it to do so.

As a side note I checked the default charging current of the Samsung S3 and it uses a 0.9 amp or 1.1 amp charger. I think the default 1100ma max current that is set in the Boeffla Control App is actually the charging current of the Samsung S3. The stock charger of the Samsung Note 2 is 2.0 amp and is capable of an output of 2000ma.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
What does safety margin do??

I use now 1700 ma and ignore unstable power

Is this safe and should i use safety margin??
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Whirlinurd:
Safety margin is just a 100ma drop so it will not spike over the recommended highest charging current that Samsung sets for its devices. It is really just the same as setting the charging direct to 1800ma when it is off. You have your base charging current and it will subtract 100ma of it when it is on. That is all.

As I said forcing a higher charge is just a tweak of the kernel. Normally the charger should reach it by itself. With a good quality third party charger and cable I reached about 1400ma without setting the ignore unstable power option. The charger I use now with a 1 meter cable I only reach 900ma just because I want the slack. The original fast charger of Samsung did reach 1700ma most of the time until it died it only gave 300ma. When I calculate the difference 1400ma to 900ma a half meter dropped the charging 500ma overall only by using a longer different cable.

First check the current draw it has at default and make your own judgement how high to set it when using ignore unstable power option. Most of the time it is safe but if your current charger and cable is not as good as it should be you are jumping a big gap. That is why phone charging recommends only a max cable length of 0.5 meters. How many cables you can buy are longer than this. It is no problem to find longer usb cables. These are only meant for data transfer but they say charging cable on the package just as easily. Is it wise to charge with them. No, not if you want to get a good experience.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Note 2 already has 2gb of ram
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
When ignore unstable power is unchecked, your charging current decreases by 100mA whenever the regulator detects a change in current. Unstable power is commonly caused by faulty cables or loose ports or even a faulty charger.

So, if you ignore unstable power and set your max current to 1000mA, even if you have faulty cable or loose ports, it will still stay at 1000mA (the charger should support the current)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Marc0601:
Then it is safe, and ignore safety margin, what it does?!
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pascua28:
Undervolting is device specific. My device works well with -100mV on both cpu and gpu, -75mV on internal voltage and -50mV on mif. +50mV on abb voltages
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mad1mystic:
the profiles are not loading for me, the profiles folder is also empty in my case, can we see the zip with dates and changelog as we can't know when the kernel zip file is updated. Thanks Developer for the kernel made device smooth battery life also increased. conservative governor would be welcome addition along with selinux enforcing just my thoughts. thanks
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
make sure to use boeffla config app. There are no premade profiles, you have to create yours, you can also set selinux in the first page
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mad1mystic:
oh I thought it has pre defined profiles like agni kernel, I already am using config app. yes I have explored all. the settings in config app and set kernel as enforcing I was thinkinhlg if it the kernel default setting was enforcing , anyways thanks for your reply.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Whirlinurd:
Hi.

Had a few random reboots two days ago but I noticed I still had the 'n7100_2.zip' inbetween update. Flashed the latest on marked stable and changed to ZZMoove governor which in my experience is more stable than PegasusQ under a lineage based kernel. Still I just had a random reboot just now. Only one for now in one day but I still like to mention it here.

Thanks.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] yreham:
Notice kernel.just pull brightness all the way up..screen is too bright can we lower that brightness level? And profile for screen calibration?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] lord_muad_dib:
with a little practice it'll be easy to create good profiles. about selinux... i don't think there are many apps that require enforcing straight on boot, there are way more that require permissive. you can also use magisk to mask your real state while keeping it permissive (safetynet also works). unless you are dealing with real critical environments that is

make sure you're using the latest kernel(link in the first post) i use the same governors and it's rock solid no reboots. also be careful with undervolting

strange, on every rom i tested the brightness is controlled by the rom sliders, not by kernel settings. maybe you have some auto brightness activated?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] saltylemondrops:
I am experiencing the same issue. The screen looks too bright. I do not use Auto Brightness feature and in Display Mode, all adjustments are disabled. The solution I found which is temporary until next restart is changing color profiles in LiveDisplay regardless which one is selected.