yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] AnonVendetta:
[MENTION=5624167]tripLr[/MENTION]: As much as it sucks, it's still kind of awesome. The fire singlehandedly solved my mobo issues, LOL. I've known for awhile that it needed to be replaced, but never got around to ordering one. As for your link to a mobo replacement, that would have been useful a few weeks ago. But I own an N910T, whereas you have a Verizon V model. So, my steps would be the same as yours, up to the point of bootloader unlocking. On the N910T this isn't necessary, you can just Odin flash TWRP, no issues, and off you go. Knox gets tripped, but who cares, I certainly don't.

It seems there is no way to contact TQTHL online, except via their Amazon profile page. However, they no longer sell the TQTHL battery for the N4 on Amazon, so I can't use that option. I have also been unable to locate a Twitter/Facebook page, Phone #, website, email, nothing. At least with ZeroLemon, it is easy to find their contact info. TQTHL is basically a ghost company with next to no presence on the Web. I bought from a seller on eBay that listed the item as new, and they had a 99% positive rating and no negative feedback.

At this point I do wonder what caused the fire. The electrical outlet wasn't faulty, I've already called my landlord's contracted electrician over to look at it and they have said that it appeared to be fine prior to the fire, although it did need to be rewired afterwards. Luckily there was no need to involve the local fire department.

It could be that charging overnight causing overheating. I used a Belkin dual USB fast charging that charges 2.5 amps per USB port, although fast charging was disabled in Settings > Battery, because I know that fast charging is bad for extended batteries. The original OEM Note 4 cable was used.

Or it could be a case of overcharging. It is said that lithium ion batteries will stop charging once they have fully reached 100%, regardless of whether they are still plugged in, to prevent overcharging. But I'm not sure if this is true. So I can't be sure if this is what happened either. It probably also depends on the quality of the battery. A stock OEM phone battery will be held to a higher standard than an extended battery, with more quality assurance testing. I would also imagine that the quality/power rating of the charger/cable plays a factor too.

My personal belief is that the battery was defective. I had pretty much the same charging tactics with the ZeroLemon, yet it never burst into flames, despite the severe degradation of capacity over time.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tripLr:
I found an OEM battery when I bought the mobo, still have the original. I use wireless charging with a stock flipflap cover , so I don't wear out the USB charging port.

Just because fast charging can happen doesn't mean it should happen.

As for a bad battery you never know.

I have seen reports that the OEM batteries are very old OEM and notmuxh good, but for 15 bucks new in the OEM packaging I didn't care.. Never tried zero lemon or any other brand.

My fingerprint scanner and right button light doesn't work, so when this dies, I'll see about the next phone.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Windroid-user:
What phone might you be looking to get next?

I have the IBESTWIN extended battery which I have used continously for months and now recently switched back to the OEM battery. Bought this phone second hand so stock battery is old however I can get maximum 4hr SOT with it, from my research I recommend ravpower battery for £10 on amazon although I remember reading one review (only one) where the battery did something similar to his. Can't remember the details but I think he/she said it was leaking and probably started smoking but I don't remember what else.

Oh and luckily no EMMC error although my phone has been 30℃+ when simply web-browsing or watching a youtube video, eBay etc.

One question, what note 4 model do you think is the best to have? Mine is N910F which I am pretty sure is the best to have, since no bootloader unlocking is required and you can easily downgrade and upgrade the firmware via Odin and it has plenty of roms to try out due to the excellent developer support behind it.

Hope it's not too long for you to read lol
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] cristobalite1983:
You already have the best variant. No other one beats it...
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Windroid-user:
Yeah that's what I thought just checking:good:
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tripLr:
I'm gonna stick with a snapdragon.

Probably the Asus ZenPhone 6. International duo ROM pretty much stock aosp
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] rickpub:
Does anyone happen to know if there were/are any builds of this kernel around for the Note Edge? Thanks
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Compumed:
Battery only charging to 95% on Havoc PIE ROM

I have been using the Flashpoint PIE 3 EXT battery kernel on the Havoc PIE 5.2 ROM with great results.

The only problem I am seeing is that the extended battery only gets to a 95% charge. When using the kernel that comes with Havoc, it does get to 100%, but Flashpoint gives much better battery life.

Any ideas why it only gets to 95%?

Thanks.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Ghanaboy:
So the update never came
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Ghanaboy:
So update never came
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] cristobalite1983:
Anyone willing to test a custom MM build, inbox me. Thanks.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] uchiha28:
is this kernel will work on OFFICIAL HAVOC-OSv2 Android 9.0 by khalvat? im using 915fy..
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] cristobalite1983:
The android 9.0 pie version of the kernel will work with that rom and also other pie custom Roms.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] uchiha28:
which android pie version because i already tried the pie version given on this link:

btw i have extended battery.

AOSP PIE Kernels

AOSP-Kernel- The same kernel that comes with LOS as of 3/6/2019 except it has the extended battery patch added.

Flashpoint-pie.3

Download

extended battery Download
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] cristobalite1983:
Download the pie extended version...
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] uchiha28:
Thanks, but which is recommended for HavocOS the pie.3 or the flashpoint aosp 9.0?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] cristobalite1983:
Follow the arrow buddy. The AOSP kernel is for non marshmallow Roms. So just download the extended battery version for your extended battery...
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] uchiha28:
Great, thanks and for the effort

Update: unfortunately it doesn't work for me, it keeps my phone on black screen after flashing and rebooted.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] cristobalite1983:
Did you try the one right above that extended battery version?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] uchiha28:
ok i will try it now and i'll update you if it will work or not.

update: still doesnt work for my sm-n915fy stuck in black screen after the samsung logo.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] cristobalite1983:
Then the logical reason is that it was not made compatible for note 4 Edge.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tripLr:
Which ROM are you using ?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] uchiha28:
havoc os
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tripLr:
Does your phone boot with havoc stock ?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MaXi32:
Maybe you should write a warning description that 'existing Xposed' will not work to bypass safetynet instead of writing an instruction how to remove them.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MEMOREX2:
New update with last source? It is possibile..... Thanks
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] uchiha28:
What do you mean boot with havoc stock? I just flash the Havoc ROM, gapps, magisk and this kernel.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] patsfann:
Quick question,, I'm a noob so forgive me if question is mute ,, but I'm on apocolyspe (star's) 910V,,flashpoint 4..

Is there any reason to upgrade my kernel.. to your latest ??
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Stolto:
Yep and the question was if your phone would boot without installing flashpoint kernel. In this case the kernel coming with the os remains untouched.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Myskiis2fast4u:
[MENTION=5285430]kevintm78[/MENTION].....i see your git for flashpoint 5 using the CQL1. I have no idea how to compile.... I've pretty much given up on RR and the lineage pie builds and have come back to TW 6.0.1, CQL1 build, but I can't get your TW beta 4 running. The very first time I tried I did manage to get the android optimizing session running but after it completed the phone rebooted and was stuck on the sammy logo. I cleared and restored back to a known good 6.0.1 backup and I tried again but was stuck on the sammy logo for well over 30min. I'm just curious to what I might be missing. I did see that beta 4 had an intertwined version of magisk in it to...15.3??? I have 19.1 installed would that be an issue? IDK....if you have and ideas of what I may have done wrong or what might be blocking me let me know. If not no big deal. Appreciate your help. Thanks

---------- Post added at 09:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:35 PM ----------

[/COLOR [MENTION=5285430]kevintm78[/MENTION].....i see your git for flashpoint 5 using the CQL1. I have no idea how to compile.... I've pretty much given up on RR and the lineage pie builds and have come back to TW 6.0.1, CQL1 build, but I can't get your TW beta 4 running. The very first time I tried I did manage to get the android optimizing session running but after it completed the phone rebooted and was stuck on the sammy logo. I cleared and restored back to a known good 6.0.1 backup and I tried again but was stuck on the sammy logo for well over 30min. I'm just curious to what I might be missing. I did see that beta 4 had an intertwined version of magisk in it to...15.3??? I have 19.1 installed would that be an issue? IDK....if you have and ideas of what I may have done wrong or what might be blocking me let me know. If not no big deal. Appreciate your help. Thanks
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] uchiha28:
yes it boots and works perfectly, btw my device is sm-n915fy. hopefully this kernel will support this device.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Stolto:
And here's your problem. Unfortunately, your variant is not among the supported devices.

On the first page you can find a statement which kernel hshould be used for the different versions of this phone. Your model is not included (yet).
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] AnonVendetta:
This isn't related to this kernel, but I found a good waist belt clip case that works great if you have the TQTHL battery and rubberized shell. It's designed for Note 4s (and similar size phones) that already have a case, not just the naked phone. I had a hard time finding a belt clip that works with the TQTHL. Still haven't found a good kickstand yet. The one thing I missed about the ZeroLemon battery was the belt clip.

The case is by Perilogics, here's the link:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07MDHYTGJ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Features:

Manufactured from ultra-durable Cordura nylon (I have used it in outdoors product, it is crazy tough fabric)

Magnetic closer, instead of Velcro

Extra zippered pocket for storage of small items (earbuds, etc)

Easy to clip on and remove (either directly, or to a belt)

Phone with case fits snugly inside without applying force, and it doesnt move around once it's inserted. Just the right fit.

I am not making money by promoting this, I'm just a satisfied user that has had this about a month.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tripLr:
Thanks for this kernel [MENTION=5285430]kevintm78[/MENTION].
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] jonnie77:
Can u add compatibility for nethunter?thanks in advance!!!
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Windroid-user:
Dude wtf I flashed this kernel to temporarily use permissive so I can flash modem via flashfire because my signal has been crap but your flashpoint v4 kernel did the complete opposite this time... it instantly found signal and gave me mobile data! Last time it tricked everything into thinking I wasn't connected to the internet (if you check old, previous posts of our conversation) what the hell man... not only that it is outperforming a godamm pixel 2 xl with mobile data what is this magic?!?

Flashfire still doesn't wanna work, which is fine right now hahaha

I'm away from a pc and on holiday.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] AnonVendetta:
[MENTION=9494825]Windroid-user[/MENTION]: Right now I'm using Ram Kernel RC7 on my N910F stock MM ROM, no major issues that I can recall. It is permissive by default, the way I like it.

I have rarely been able to get FlashFire to work with Magisk, almost every time I tried it the flash would appear to succeed, but upon booting into Android everything looked the same as before. FF is fine but TWRP is much better and preferable.

I try to avoid Magisk and dont trust it due to bad experiences with it. My fave root is Phh's Superuser.

As for flashing modem, you really should only use Odin for that. If you have a PC then I advise you to just use Odin.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Windroid-user:
Yeah I just downloaded rc3 because that one has been available longer than rc7 and been the most stable and recommended version. If you can check if safetynet passes with the kernel that would be great but I think I'm going to see for myself. Actually I'll flash rc3 and try rc7 at home because from what I've read rc3 passes safetynet by tricking the apps it's enforcing and rc7 hasn't worked for a few people running devbase (not the latest version older ones).

Thanks for your reply this has gotten me into actually flashing a custom kernel on this thing haha.

One more thing what kernel auditor settings do you recommend, I don't need performance but battery life is pretty bad hopefully the kernel alone will show a noticeable improvement.

---------- Post added at 09:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 AM ----------

Oh you don't use magisk lol then I'm guessing you have probably tripped safetynet with xposed or some other things. No worries.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] AnonVendetta:
[MENTION=9494825]Windroid-user[/MENTION]: Yeah I've tripped SN, by having Xposed installed. I dont care about stuff like banking apps, NetFlix, Pokemon Drain The Battery Go, etc.

As for RamKernel, the author states that it is designed to pass SN, but whether it actually does so reliably I cant say. It probably depends on the version installed. I pretty much break every rule in the book, I suppose J probably have more than a few things installed that triggers it.

Honestly I'd say that anything from RC4 to RC6 is good for battery life. I say RC4 or higher because that is first version that has double tap to wake. RC7 is fine too, I've found that Private Mode doesnt work with it, but I dont care. Some have have reported heat issues with RC7, but for me they seem to stay within normal ranges. Heat is definitely something I'm keeping an eye on, especially after my last N4 died in a catastrophic fire, which I posted about in this thread. Honestly I only care that the kernel works with the TQTHL extended battery.

I dont normally mess with the kernel settings, it runs fine on whatever the defaults are, and battery life is excellent. Sometimes the battery % is a bit off but rebooting usually fixes that. This is even despite the author's claim that the kernel supports extended batteries.

As for Magisk, I dont trust it because I suspect it to be the cause of past lags, crashes, etc. And I dont need systemless mods, root hiding, etc. All I really need is simple root. Just grant root to my damn apps silently and I'm happy, I trust the apps I use. For me Phh does that really well, nothing more or less.

I had pretty bad battery life with the Pie ROMs I've tried, I'm good with rooted stock MM. Right now my longer term goal is to release a custom MM ROM with lots of debloat, mods, performance enhancements. And, eventually, to release a kernel that fully supports Kali NetHunter and other features I would want (F2FS, WireGuard, etc).

Honestly the only reason I dont switch back to FlashPoint is:

1. The root restriction I mentioned in an earlier post

2. The author seems to have shifted away from supporting stock ROMs

3. Not being able to charge to 100% when rooted or an extended battery is present (that's my understanding of it)

[MENTION=5285430]kevintm78[/MENTION] is a skilled guy and he deserves props for his efforts.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] jhford:
[MENTION=8411613]Stolto[/MENTION]. I have an N910T with a standard battery. I already mistakenly flashed v.3 for extended batteries. So, I just downloaded the plain vanilla v.3 version. Is that the right one and can I flash on top of the extended battery version I already flashed? Also, do I need to set any parameters in the Kernel Adiutor app or just simply flash it and use the defaults? Thanks
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] AnonVendetta:
[MENTION=263313]jhford[/MENTION]: If you have your ROM's boot.img then it is best to flash that first before Flashpoint. Or if you're on pure stock, use boot.img that corresponds to that. Theoretically there should be no issues flashing similar kernels over each other, but for years I have taken the safe advice of flashing stock/ROM boot.img first.

v3 is the best version for N910T, I used to have that phone before it caught fire while charging, for months v3 was my go-to kernel. v4 is fine too but it's considered more beta-ish. Dont bother with v5, even if you can get it to flash successfully. In this case older is better.

No, you dont need to set parameters with any kernel app, it should run fine as-is. But if you're feeling adventurous...just be aware that crashes are much more likely when you start messing with settings.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] jhford:
[MENTION=279987]Anon[/MENTION]Vendatta. Thank you. I'm running Official Havoc 2.8 on my N910T. Are you saying that I should flash the Havoc boot.img now on top of the ROM, or reflash the ROM completely after flashing the boot.img? And is the kernel's sole purpose to increase battery life? If so, by how much, i.e., is it worth it?

Thanks again
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] AnonVendetta:
[MENTION=263313]jhford[/MENTION]: Yes, that's what I'm saying.....but FlashPoint v3 and v4 are for *STOCK* ROMs, Havoc wont boot with those. There is normally no need to reflash the ROM, unless you just cant get it to boot.

No, the kernel's sole purpose isnt to increase battery life, but that can be a positive side effect of a good kernel. Think of the brain, your body is useless without it. So, a kernel is basically the software brain of your phone, it (after the bootloader) is what makes Android run and keep it going.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] jhford:
Of course, I know that all ROMS, including Havoc, and operating systems have a kernel at their core. But, how is flashpoint superior to go the kernel that was included in Havoc? BTW, I'm running Havoc with flashpoint 3.10.108 right now and it seems OK. It will be overwritten when I flash the next Havoc update.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] AnonVendetta:
[MENTION=263313]jhford[/MENTION]: Honestly I would just keep whatever kernel is built into the ROM, I doubt FlashPoint is superior to it. With the latest FP for AOSP/LOS-based ROMs, you cannot charge to 100% (in the limited tests that I did).
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] 3v3rdim:
Got another n910f....using havoc rom...on stock boot.img.....after installing flashpoint....will there be a short period for battery to learn usage patterns again....coz it seems to drain a bit faster....
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Windroid-user:
What happened to your previous one?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] 3v3rdim:
Fell into the river....??
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tripLr:
Were using most of his stuff from github. [MENTION=6847876]_mone[/MENTION] has all the stock sources up on his github as well.

Github.com/underscoremone

---------- Post added at 06:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:55 AM ----------

In my opinion , the ROM [MENTION=6847876]_mone[/MENTION] made for aicp Oreo is the finest Oreo ROM made.

Kevin was the best pie so we use it on all our builds.

In my tiny.cc/triplr in homage to [MENTION=6847876]_mone[/MENTION] and [MENTION=5285430]kevintm78[/MENTION] I publish the kernels that come with my builds. Some are flashable , some not.

Any ROM you download with a roomservice for the sources that includes the kernel can be compiled just by mka bootimage.

Let me know if you want help in the custom kernel area. We need some more kernel hackers for the note 4 as well as other devices. .

Pm me? Or I'm on telegram as triplr
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Sizzlincok:
Can't seem to get doubletap2wake to work. I've followed the instructions in the 2nd post, but even then I couldn't find any files in root.

Even double tap to lock on home screen with Nova Launcher doesn't work.

Just shows "Nova has been granted superuser" and that's it.

I'm on Havoc. Any ideas?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] cristobalite1983:
Double tap to wake doeent work for any of the AOSP pie custom Roms unlike you find a 3rd party app to do what you need...
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] shonkin:
I'm happily using this kernel (the rooted and ported version) with my N910T phone. But I am wondering if anyone knows of a 2017 or even 2018 datafix file? The ones I have been flashing are from 2016, even 2015. I am not sure what exactly is in a datafix file, but suspect the newer update it is the better.

Thanks for any help on this.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MEMOREX2:
How to applicated your profile ?thanks
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Garfildek:
Hello guys, i would like to ask you have to make this kernel with root. I flashed black dog n7 port v9, made unsu and xposed uninstaller and flashe flashpoint 910f port kernel. I tried to installed su but did not work :-X what to do? Flash cf root? Thanks!
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] jufegoco:
Hey Bro, I was installed this kernel yesterday. It's working very good but in my first charge battery rich 70% and no more. Somebody can tell something about? It's not a grand deal for me, but I would like to know if it's normal or not or if I can do something to avoid this...

Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad English please

Enviado desde mi SM-N920F mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] the simpson:
There are 2 version of kernels.

1- Flashpoint.v3.1-910F.zip

2- Flashpoint.v3.1-port-910F.zip

What version can i use?

I am on ManuProN5 Astra Dream S8 UX ROM v3.0eX

N910F

Thanks!
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] MEMOREX2:
:svetius:flashpoint v3.1 port 910f