yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Atm i don't see any chance to change voltages for the cpu. If it would be possible, yes that could let you reach a higher oc maybe. For sure it would drain battery more.

If i'm right there's not a single kernel for the exynos8895 that could adjust voltages or little cluster frequencies atm. Which means that none of us has found a way to do that until now.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Nice one!

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Do you have boot problems with the 2.8 or 2.65 versions? If not, why you're not setting it to 2,496 or 2.574?

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Testbuilds:

https://mega.nz/#F!oxtCFagY!CnGqfnbD34vcp7d7mDeY0A

First number big cluster max clock, second number max GPU clock, last toolchain and version.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
2.5 = 2496MHz? Right? Check test dirictory please.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ~M☆tis~:
Holy crap! 683 mhz gpu? Has anyone even used that successfully?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
No :D With high GPU ASV maybe it works.

I would provide a lower step. But i'm still trying to break the custom frequency lock for the GPU. If i could find a way it will be lower.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ~M☆tis~:
Oh well, thought so. Would be interesting to see someone complete a benchmark at that frequency plus 2.81 for cpu, but the phone would probably have to be in a fridge:D
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] dannycellestio:
worth a shot
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] dannycellestio:
didn't crash but got pretty hot

no other modifications just maxed out both big and little, set them both on performance, and also the gpu, with booster on

what do you think? :D
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ~M☆tis~:
Did you use the version with 683 mhz oc for gpu?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] jooniloh:
Well I sure hope so. It's either working, or I've been on the best drugs the last couple days..

---------- Post added at 06:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:27 PM ----------

I'm kind of at a loss at this point so I'm hoping someone here can help, or direct me to a better place to ask. None of the synapse specific places seem to have any useful activity or feedback from the dev at this point. Everything was running perfectly with no issues (and technically the kernel itself still does) until I accidentally hit that "clear synapse data" accidentally. The first thing I noticed when my phone rebooted was that xposed had been disabled. Then in synapse I could no longer load profiles. Every single time I tried I got an error that I'm missing the sqlite3 binary, which indeed is not in /system/bin where it's looking. I don't know if the file was deleted or something, but I'm sure it was working before. The profile loading issue doesn't even start with that though. I checked the synapse files and the actual text file that the profile is supposed to be saved to is a 0-byte file. I get no errors while saving a profile though, only loading. Also, the I/O scheduler settings keep bugging out entirely with a Java related error I can't recall exactly, but basically it's saying the default value doesn't match any of the actual values in the list. I tried installing a different kernel app and it can read that value just fine and let's me change it, but nothing I do will remove that error in synapse until I hit the "clear synapse data" button again, which now doesn't disable xposed every time.

Any ideas?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
not bad, but i've though that it could break 200000. I would try to lower CPU to something around 2600, 2574 or 2652. If GPU goes to 683 you could check with CPUFloat. PlayStore ;)

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
I would uninstall synapse, reboot, dirty flash ROM and Kernel. Reboot and install Synapse again. Maybe i'll remove this clear button. In my opinion senseless.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ~M☆tis~:
Actually, i managed to break 200000 when my phone was stable at 2.81 and gpu at 572. Cpu clusters both on performance and min gpu frequency at 572:cool:
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Lovely score
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Nice one! 2.81 version from my test directory, right?

Well maybe i'll not keep the 683 step. Main goal is to replace it with a custom step between 600 and 620. That could be stable for more users and not that hot.

What are you and others think? Keep 683, or kick it?

Start scenario is 546.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ~M☆tis~:
Benchmark was done on version 1.1.0 or the 1.0.1 alpha, not sure. And yes definitely go for the lower step, i dont think most of us will ever use 683 succesfully anyway lol
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Maybe you could give the test version a go with these settings too. General smoothness feeling is better in my opinion.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ~M☆tis~:
Will try it these days!

Also smth I've been thinking about: i remember having a note 3 and on many custom kernels you had the option to offline cpu cores. Just out of curiosity, would it be possible to get such feature on the note 8? I think it has to do with having a custom hotplug, correct?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
You're talking about completely disabled cores? With EX Kernel Manager you could. CPU Tab, tap on CPU Cores.

I could add it to Synapse config.

Not today, watching Superbowl :D

Edit: Ups, EX is offering the option but it is not working. I'll add it to Synapse and check if it works there.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] DeejayTelis:
Hello there! Been watching this thread for quite a while now, because all the stuff featured in this kernel seem awesome! I'm thinking of installing it on my Exynos Note 8, along with Iron man ROM. And i was wondering, will there be an update for smurfkernel since BRA2 firmware recently came out? Well, is there even any reason for an updated smurfkernel with BRA2 stuff?

(Thank you for that awesome looking kernel :D )
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] jooniloh:
I've uninstalled synapse and flashed the kernel again, but can't really do much about the rom. I'm on stock atm and really don't wanna reset everything again. Is there supposed to be an sqlite3 binary at /system/bin? Can someone upload it here if there is?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Should be in xbin.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] rico13:
CPUfloat... This tool is great! Ta :)
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Yep, nice to check if things really work as expected. Best tool ever for live monitoring. Without it i wouldn't have seen that custom frequencies for GPU are not working. On any Kernel for the S8/Note 8. Checked all that offer custom frequencioes.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] jooniloh:
Checked xbin too. Don't have it.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Ok, Synapse has root permission, could have deleted it. Uploading it if i'm at home.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
https://mega.nz/#!cpEA0L6b!hLlD9Q6w2K7--taTp_vbTVU-Zp-lNYF42g5JjK10gMA

permissions rwxr xr x

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] jooniloh:
Yeah at this point I'm fairly certain that first clear data really screwed some stuff up. Kinda worried about what else might have gotten deleted.

---------- Post added at 09:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 PM ----------

Sticking this in xbin did the trick. Profiles are loading correctly now. Not sure about the other bugs I saw though. They don't always happen, but I haven't seen it in a while. The profile loading is the only one I could test consistently.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] jooniloh:
So.... Something deleted my sqlite3 again... What the heck
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Well sorry but it looks like only you have that problem. No idea why.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] dannycellestio:
hey papa, do you have the time to make flashables out of the test builds or is a stable build cookin? need em zips for a multiboot setup. thanks in advance!
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Just rename the image and replace the one in the zip ;)

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] dannycellestio:
dumb me didn t think it was that easy thanks :D
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] lzanetti:
Random reboot only happens at the time when the phone from screen on to screen off. It never happens when the screen is on. So I think there maybe a crash when cpu running from some frequency to idle. Now I use SmurfKernel_1.0.1_alpha version barely has no random reboot problem. What's the difference between this one and others?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Have you tried the testversions? Posted a link to the testdir some posts up.

Major changes updating base to linux 107, GPU UV, synapse integration.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Surprise surprise @ 2.71 interactive
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ilia1985:
Nothing to be surprised about antutu 7.0.x is totally different and can't be compared to antutu 6.x.x for example here is the score I got on v7 and only @2.574ghz, but then again I'm on a xceed kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
King of the Hill
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ilia1985:
Guess again! :) :p
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Nice score. Should try ur kernel.

Greetsz
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Leuter:
Although i have these ASV's: big: 5, LITTLE: 6, INT: 8, MIF: 8, G3D: 3, ISP: 8

i got (once) an AnTuTu-result of 224202. Not bad, ey?

But using Synapse i got several error-messages:

I'm using Synapse the first time, so here's my question:

Is this normal?

If not: How can i fix this bug :confused: ?

Greetings, Leuter.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Ah ok, busybox pathes are wrong. Just install a busybox from playstore and you're done. Correcting these pathes next version to /sbin/busybox.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Leuter:
Yeah, i did it - and most of the messages (...busybox: not found) disappeared. Then i re-installed Synapse and the rest followed.

Thx for help.

Now i have (like most others) the problem with the red memory result in AnTuTu. Can you imagine, how we can make it black?

I mean, we have 6GB RAM and the test-result is worse than from a Nexus 5... This cries for a solution!

An AnTuTu-test after solving my BusyBox-problem brought me 222465 (but still with a lousy MEM-result).

Greetings, Leuter.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
On what settings in synapse u did get this score.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Disable dynamic fsync. That always makes ux score shown red, because of files are not directly synced if dynfsync is on. Dynsync is faster but well not as secure as if files are synced directly. Making disabled default nextt version, ok?

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Interestingly score differs much between ROMs. And well it depends massively on what apps are installed. Benching only makes sende on a settled down fresh system without anything installed. Renovate is a good choice for benches.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Leuter:
LITTLE on 1690 / performance and big on 2808 / performance.

But (Don't laugh!) i made some experiments before Synapse and tried out Octa Core Processor Booster. There i activated the Extreme Speed Boost-Mode and i think it helps. Unneccessary background-activities are eliminated. If you wanna try it, confirm the Optimization directly before you run AnTuTu!

My last AnTuTu-result (after enabling Dynsync): 221788, but with dark black Mem-result!

I will let the Phone cool down and then try it again....

Greetings, Leuter.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] McGunn0r:
Little 1690

Big 2704

Both on Interactive

GPU 683 on Booster

:D

https://xdaforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4420309&stc=1&d=1518649297
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Wich kernel version
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] McGunn0r:
it's the "greatlte-eur-2.81-683-UBER641_dynsync_opt"... But 2808 on the big cluster is not stable on my Note... :/
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Tis megaupload app.

Stupiditeit
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
The Mega app works great. Just install flashify and you could directly flash after download if you have selected flashify once. Doing that all the time because of uploading kernel images instead of copying over usb.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Thanks

U just made my life easier
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
No problem, you're welcome ;) Next final will be a zip again for sure. Only the test builds come as an image.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Leuter:
Ladies and gentlemen!

Still with Kernel 2.0.4, LITTLE on 1690/performance, big on 2808/performance and dynsync enabled, i put my note at 0°C/32°F for 5 minutes on the windowsill outside the kitchen. Then i started the benchmark:

Who's the king of the hill?

Greetings, Leuter.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] kairi_zeroblade:
you are doing it on 2.8ghz and performance governor..we are just doing it on 2.5ghz and Interactive..anyways...take your crown...:silly:
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
It's very simple, [MENTION=578749]lila[/MENTION]1985, we stop this comparison now. Post your Antutu scores in the thread where these belong to, ok?! This is not the general kernel comparison thread.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
I'm failry sure you would have even higher scores lowering the maximum clock. 2808 heats up very much. And well performance is not a real world governor. Instead of lowering clock if it is to hot, cores are switched to offline. No idea if that is really faster than using one of the classic governors. And well in normal operation you never would use performance.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Ah and by the way, we need a new SOC, the GPU tests in Antutu 7.0.4 are running so bad, uah, for next generation GPU's i think :D

In general i don't like Antutu very much. The scores are so inconsistent, especially on a daily driver system populated with apps. All this SOT and bench comparison is complete bull**** if you guys are not on the same ROM and have the same app set (or better zero apps) installed.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Leuter:
Generally you're right. I did it just for AnTuTu, although i agree with you. The only thing for me is, that i don't wanna read, that my brandnew 800€-smartphone is trash, when the ranking of the new AnTuTu-app will be published. And all people around me (irl) believe, that AnTuTu is the standard of all things....

Edit: Your "different ROM"-Argument is none. The differences between the handy-setups make us learn, to optimize our phones to the best results. I hope, that somebody (e.g. with better ASV's) will follow me and beat my score!
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
There are for sure performance differences between the ROMs we have here. Mods etc. influence the performance a little. Could be 10-15k points.

And for sure it is ok that you publish bench results here. That simply is not be the kernel vs. kernel thread. Not your fault, you posted results of the Smurf and not results of another kernel. In my opinion we (the devs) work together and not against each other.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
A bit competition benefits us all
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Sure just open a kernel comparison thread.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
A tip guys, if you don't want to bench deactivate Antutu in settings->apps or uninstall it. Antutu starts a background process that consumes a remarkable amount of battery. I've not analysed what it is doing exactly, but well, if you don't run a bench, you don't need anything from Antutu running.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Indeed. Antutu Chinese spyware
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] moderndaycowboy:
Can I use this kernel with BRA2 baseband rom?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] shouren04:
Yes, I am.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Could you check a test build? Contact me if interested. Telegram or pm.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] shouren04:
Sure, happy to help if I can. I've never used Telegram, I send you a PM.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Send me the testbuild
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Dear Note 8 users,

Tis is now Hamburger Hill :svetius:

Deserters will be shot.

Thx poppasmurf. Ur kernel rocks on 683.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Np, if new version is ready you could test it. Last test build wasn't bootable, sorry.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Leuter:
Which ROM do you use? Did you keep the phone cool?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] kairi_zeroblade:
GL tools..voila!! since you can't get honest to goodness scores..its time to cheat.. :fingers-crossed:
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Dr Ketan rom n8

Smurfkernel testbeta 2.81ghz 683gpu edition @ 2.71

Governor interactieve

GPU power controle always_on

Exterminate memory on synapse with additional front apps 110 mb ram allocation.

No active cooling just in the case

---------- Post added at 02:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:32 PM ----------

Who the hell is this guy, accusing the Emperor.

Ur kernel and performance has been obliterated by Smurfkernel several times now.

I as the Emperor of the Hill pardon you !
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
^_^
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Voltage you're using for 683? Your ASV for GPU is 5, right?

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
These stock voltages.

Absolute World record !
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
286.000

Indeed from stock 207099

Praising Allah and the Smurfkernel
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Updated BRA2/8 in the test directory.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] bigpapa007:
I installed 2.0.4 on n950f with infinity rom latest version and my phone wouldn't boot at all, I just got the note 8 screen then it vibrated and again the same screen.

Had to install another kernel to make it boot again :\
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] moderndaycowboy:
Allah may not be existed, but smurf is.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
U should wait 4 more reboots eventually of does boot.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] bigpapa007:
I waited 15 minutes and nothing. No kernel I've tried in any phone has taken more than 10 max.

I'm in QKG baseband if that matters.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
scroll a little back and check test dir. You should try a lower clocked version i think. Filename contains frequency. If you switch in twrp to flssh image you could flash it. Or with flashify.

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ilia1985:
Deleted
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] shouren04:
That's strange, I was running 2.0.4 on QKG bl+modem just fine with QKG base rom. I'm currently on RA2 bl+modem running running QKG base rom & 2.0.4 still working perfectly fine.

---------- Post added at 10:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:48 PM ----------

This one booting just fine with RA2 bl+modem but it makes the VoLTE icon appear for me in the status bar like some other kernels I've tried in the past. Any idea why the kernel would afffect that & how to disable it? As I mentioned in prev conversation, 2.0.4 doesn't make the VoLTE icon appear. Aurora kernel is the only other kernel I've tried in the past that does not make the VoLTE icon appear.... besides the stock kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
What a wimp. GO TAKE SOME VITAMINS.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Power to the Smurfkernel !

---------- Post added at 10:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:28 AM ----------

Id bet u use smurfkernel and declare thats ur XSeed kernel.

With urs ive never got something like this.

What a faint.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
Well dream on pal. I used ur kernel and this is NOT possible. Tis score of urs, it seems only you are capabel of getting this score with xceed.

Very Nice
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] Maroc_Specops:
U can put me as Emperor next to Kim yung un and Djenghis Khand
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ~M☆tis~:
Wow this is sad lol
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] pappschlumpf:
Hey guys, please stop these fights here now!!! Smurf scores here, Xeed scores in Xeed thread. Ok?

Gesendet von meinem SM-N950FD mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] TurricanM3:
Just wondering. Why don't we have a undervolting option for the CPU?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] ilia1985:
Because it's nearly impossible with the new exynos chips due to Samsung's dynamic voltage and frequency controls.
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, &] TurricanM3:
So why can't we just change the voltage table to one of a better binned cpu?