yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Honor 6X Questions & Answers] shashank1320:
Oeminfo via multi tool ir twrp.data file is for regaining the updater app, theme, clock etc but oeminfo will fix your issue of generic device or nrd-test keys.
[Moto G4 Questions & Answers] Pollyanno:
Hello friends some moto g4 user xt1626? I did the bootloader + twrp + cusrom ROM + elemental x procedure. It's all running smoothly but I found a problem, ran out of TV someone can help how to solve this.
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] RedSkull23:
Hi all, just discovered that with the latest update that contains the November 5th security patch by google, and so for my build it's from BLN-L21C432B369, but i don't know if this will happens on EVERY build that contains the November security patch, there are new features like app twin feature, and suggestions from settings screen, brand new stuff that came with the update other than the patch. Screens here below shows in the 1st there are some suggestions, or reminders, about mobile data deactivated, for example. The 2nd obviously shows how app twin feature is present in settings menu ("app gemella" translated from Italian to English stands just for app twin).

Comment and notify here if you guys will find other new features from latest/future updates, in way to keep us updated each other about new stuff and utilities on our OS :)
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] Nollie8969:
Not in my B369 ?, while the device number is the same.
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] RedSkull23:
Wait, sadly i have to correct myself; just noticed that as i fixed the incorrect model number shown in settings (i got generic_a15 other than BLN-L21 after an update ended bad) the features have disappeared. I suppose that those features are already present in another variant, but not in ours actually. Why they make things like this and NFC present only in some variants, damn Huawei.
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] Nollie8969:
Maybe it means that we' re getting Oreo soon ?
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] shashank1320:
YEs we are..see here

Honor 6X Oreo update request form- https://xdaforums.com/honor-6x/how-to/discussion-emui-8-android-o-honor-6x-t3725406
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] Supersad:
My 6x is still on August patch with b340.im from India
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] RedSkull23:
Thanks dude, I'm reading it now

Already gave a check on firmware finder/team mt site if is the latest build available for your model?
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] shashank1320:
Flash manually b350
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] Supersad:
Yaa I gave a search and found that the b350 update is present but I aren't sure if I should wait for an ota or update it manually

---------- Post added at 03:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:15 PM ----------

Which one are you running?
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] shashank1320:
B350 since 26th October
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] Supersad:
Which patch does it have?

---------- Post added at 03:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:55 PM ----------

Which patch is there in this update

---------- Post added at 03:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:55 PM ----------

Could you post a screenshot of the about phone of your device
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] shashank1320:
I moved to elite v6 on 22nd December and to v7 yesterday.

I think it was October 5th patch. Also there are few more update for Vodafone Volte with November patch
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] Supersad:
Should I wait for the official ota or manually download it and flash it?
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] shashank1320:
Your preference buddy
[Honor 6X Guides, News, & Discussion] RedSkull23:
Yeah i've discovered only later that it was Magisk fault, and now i must update my device again -_- i thought i did somethin' wrong, but i didn't.
[Touch Cruise General] gmc:
Hey there...

my Orbit2 (polaris) was working fine for some weeks now.

Well, something weird happened. Since yesterday the Storage Card doesn't show up anymore on my Orbit2.

I have no PC microSD-Reader to test it with that. But what the hell is that. I did nothing with the card. Really weird.

Any suggestions? Maybe a registry thing?

Thanks
[Touch Cruise General] wis38:
Time to time my Cruise loses the card too...

This happens especially when doing weired things like lunching TomTom with the usb connected to the PC, and a sync starts blocking everything.

Usually it is just enough to hot remove and reinsert the card to get it back.

Beware, if you are obliged to reboot and the card is not seen yet, the system creates a "storage card" folder in the system memory and if your card gets recognized after, its name becomes "storage card 2".

To get back things, with the sd card outside the phone you have to erase the folder "storage card" just created.

Also, looking at forums it seems some people got the card corrupted, thus requiring the card to be reformatted (experience not yet tried).
[Touch Cruise General] gmc:
Thanks for the answer.

Seems to be, that I'm in bigger trouble because removing and inserting doesn't help ;(

Even PocketMechanic doesn't recognize any card. But the device recognizes that i insert something because the backlight turns on when removing/inserting the card.

Also noticed the thing with the folder.

Hmm.. is there a key in the registry that could have something to do with that?

Well too bad. Will need to get a reader anywhere. Wanted to get a new, bigger card anyway but i need the data, hope it's not corrupted.

Bye
[Touch Cruise General] alipi2007:
try this:

HKLM\System\StorageManager\Profiles\Auto Mount ... change to 1. if its alreay 1 change to 0 than again change to 1. becoz 1 to show SDcard. restert requer fot the effects.
[Touch Cruise General] Neubi:
hey,

got the same problem with the sd-card ...

why this happens :

- removed the sd-card

- started tomtom6 without maps stored on sd

- reinserted the sd-card

-> wm6 now did not recognize the inserted card !??

tried :

- softreset with and without the card

- changed the "automount" 0 / 1 and restarted the system several times (with and without the card)

- wm6 creates a folder called "StorageCard" ... deleted this folder ... restart ... different combinations of folder-delete / restart / registry change

but nothing works ... want to prevent the "hardreset" - any suggestions :confused::confused::confused:

thx

Neubi
[Touch Cruise General] Astro1:
Unrecognised micro SD card

Guys

Are yiou sure that the card is ok ?

I picked up an 8gig card from the web , it worked for a month then just died !

It is not recognised in any device / computer , its just dead !!!

Not sure why this should happen as I didnt touch/ remove the card , it was working , I went to bed , woke up and it wasnt working the next day !

£40.00 down the drain ,

Astro1
[OnePlus 3 Questions & Answers] ariyan rana:
due to usb port issue my oneplus 3 not connecting with pc so cant unlock bootloader.

is there any possible way to unlock bootloader without pc ?
[Xposed General] theOriginalSuperl2:
The UBER toolchain is "a bleeding edge toolchain based on latest gnu.org changes and patched with aosp and linaro android patches for optimal performance/battery." https://xdaforums.com/android/software/toolchain-uber-toolchains-t3527997

I built my own rom with this toolchain, and realized that xposed was replacing my own ART with a modified one built with standard android GCC 4.9, so I decided to compile xposed with UBER. When I flashed this the result was incredible, apps loaded so much faster than before, so I figured I'd share what I've done so everyone can benefit. I highly recommend using a ROM that's been built entirely with this toolchain, go ask your ROM devs!

Before you ask: I'm not building for any other android versions, unless I switch myself.

Downloads attached, or you can get from elsewhere:

ARM64, SDK25

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1UXfS-p1SZ4PKE0tBtNJbXLH02gb-O3gC

https://mega.nz/#!8U40yQrS!rI4jdxEOIJYLvwFvqS9ZCKjoCisrxmfIkhYCaeZKy38

ARM64, SDK23 (UNTESTED, USE AT YOUR OWN RISK)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lj7IgGHYuGeOyVsqm9GIuy02KOIHoUaI/view?usp=sharing

https://mega.nz/#!VMR3yb6B!Up_BmgiROfW28LJALSRdQrP2n7soZRWJy4X8UBOI6OY
[Xposed General] Revenge282:
Are there any benchmarks or numbers you can put up about the performance changes, if any?
[Xposed General] gothicVI:
Die you notice [MENTION=4419114]rovo89[/MENTION] about your findings? Eventually open a github issue. It might benefit future development.

Gesendet von meinem Moto G 2014 LTE mit Tapatalk
[Xposed General] theOriginalSuperl2:
I'll have a look. I'm not really sure how well it will effect benchmarks, especially since the benchmarking app itself won't be compiled with this toolchain. This toolchain just optimises programs to run better on the same rom and soc, so a benchmark can't really detect that.

At the moment, though, I can tell you from experience; it feels ridiculously fast compared to normal xposed/art. Try it yourself to see (if anything goes wrong you can just flash standard xposed again)
[Xposed General] rovo89:
I'm always very sceptical about performance improvements with experimental toolchains or cherry-picked commits from various sources. I prefer to stick to AOSP as unless there are really big improvements.

Often enough, performance gains are only placebo effects or caused by different testing situations (like waiting longer after rebooting). Especially for ART, you have to consider that it's a compiler itself. The generated code is highly optimized already and won't be affected at all by the toolchain which was used to compile ART. Same for JIT, which uses the same ART compiler, and mostly even for the interpreter, which also partly uses assembly code that has been optimized by developers at Google, ARM, Intel,...

What you should really do is measure the startup time of an app multiple times. I think there are tools which give insights like that, like systrace. Benchmark will indeed not be very helpful.
[Xposed General] theOriginalSuperl2:
I suppose it could be a placebo, I don't know. I once read something the UBERTC developer said about porting some features from the linaro toolchain, including making apps launch faster. I'll test it properly when I get the time. Is it possible that the toolchain makes the JIT interpreter run faster? That could explain why if there's a difference when I compile ART with this toolchain.
[Xposed General] Revenge282:
I'm going to say that there's a pretty high chance this is all a placebo effect. The benchmarks I mentioned are what rovo mentioned about measuring app launch time. System benchmarks aren't going to tell us anything useful about this.

It's also not going to make apps that come out of the ART compiler any faster, it will, if anything, just make the ART compile process faster. As far as JIT, I can't speak for certain, but I would imagine it is unlikely.
[Xposed General] theOriginalSuperl2:
[MENTION=5445494]Revenge282[/MENTION] and [MENTION=4419114]rovo89[/MENTION],

I've done some tests, luckily enough app startup times get printed in logcat on launch. I tested the settings app and FX file explorer.

I first tested both without clearing the ART cache, beacause as we're really focusing on JIT speeds I didn't think it was that important. I decided to in the end, though. Here are the results:

EDIT: I forgot to say, I waited for the logcat output to quieten down after booting before launching the apps.

[B]// With UBERTC, no cache clear - AVERGAGE: 563.5ms[/B]
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +634ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +556ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +562ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +580ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +531ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +518ms

[B]// Without UBERTC, no cache clear - AVERGAGE: 560.8333 recurring ms[/B]
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +567ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +600ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +568ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +600ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +514ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +516ms

[B]// With UBERTC, cache clear - AVERGAGE: 602.8333 recurring ms[/B]
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +594ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +569ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +632ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +647ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +585ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +590ms

[B]// Without UBERTC, cache clear - AVERAGE: 599.33 recurring ms[/B]
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +551ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +608ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.android.settings/.Settings: +556ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +661ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +603ms
ActivityManager: Displayed nextapp.fx/.ui.ExplorerActivity: +617ms

So there's no noticeable difference (the times are so similar), but Settings and FX File Explorer are pretty small apps, and I think there's probably not much JIT going on for them. I'll try some resource heavy games later ( [MENTION=4419114]rovo89[/MENTION], I'm assuming games have a lot more code in them, so it's more efficient for android to use JIT than have a huge compiled file. Is that the case?) I'll also take a look at app install times.
[Xposed General] theOriginalSuperl2:
[MENTION=5445494]Revenge282[/MENTION] and [MENTION=4419114]rovo89[/MENTION],

I've tested Despicable Me: Minion Rush, and here are the results. I cleared the ART and android caches both times. The first lines are when the app is launched for the first time since the cache was wiped. It's almost double without UBERTC, so it's likely it help with initial compile times. After the first line, it's still about 200ms faster each time, so there must be some JIT happening. Of course, this isn't enough testing to prove anything, but it definitely looks like UBERTC does something.

[B]// With UBERTC - AVERAGE: 734.8ms[/B]
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +940ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +705ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +682ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +695ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +652ms
[B]
// Without UBERTC - AVERAGE: 855.2ms[/B]
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +1s57ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +821ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +811ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +783ms
ActivityManager: Displayed com.gameloft.android.ANMP.GloftDMHM/.MainActivity: +804ms
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Guides, News, & Discussion] hugor671:
Xiaomi A1

=== INFORMATION ===

The Xiaomi Mi A1 XDA™ group intends to be a channel of content sharing dedicated to this technology segment.

1. Keep it civil

2. English only (/try Maximum/)

3. Stick to what the group is meant for

4. No piracy, warez

5. Use your brain

6. Mod decisions are final

7. DO NOT ASK FOR ETAs. /Seriously/

https://t.me/joinchat/F0qRckS-TeZi24EXAZ4LVg See you there!!
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Guides, News, & Discussion] KennyG123:
There is already a Telegram group here

Search before posting and do not spam the forums!

Thread closed
[LG G6 Accessories] B0lle:
Hey Guys,

I'd really like to buy me the LG G6, but buying a feature cutted Phone kinda su**...

I probably wont miss the quad dac, but I'm really into Qi charging.

I read about these pads, but I don't like blocking my usb Port all the time, so I looked for a case, which might get me this, but haven't found one.

Is there anything like this to buy?

Thanks and greetings
[LG G6 Accessories] Krysdyan:
Since the version without wireless charging has no option to get current into the device beside the USB port,

the port will always be blocked by any solution for wireless charging.
[LG G6 Accessories] coyot352:
Just buy the G6 with this option, its better (design and performances) and cheaper (price is better)
[LG G6 Accessories] B0lle:
Thanks for your replies, I know it's gonna block the usb Port, but I hope there would be a better solution than these pads...

I found this case for iPhone by Nillkin with which I would be absolutly fine, but there's probably nothing compareable for the LG:

amazon.de/dp/B06X194B87/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_2YZrAbY15P00F

I would really like to buy the Plus US Version, especially the Amazon Prime Version for 499, but as I live in Germany, things are a little bit complicated (and expansive)

I probably just gonna wait for the G7 and hope, they wont tread customers that different again...
[LG G6 Accessories] KiMZE:
I bought LG G6 H870 too.

I would like to use the QI but i don't know. There is an accessories which can enable the charging ?

Thanks.
[LG G6 Accessories] varefaz:
here an accessory but i don't know if it's reliable!

USB Type C of charging receiver

let me know if someone know something
[LG G6 Accessories] ed_bracam:
I had one wireless patch connected to the USB-C but I returned it to Amazon for the following reasons:

- Even if it is defined as "slim", it is not really slim and distorts the phone case and back of the phone becomes curved...

- The charging power is very sensitive to how to place the phone on the wireless charger. The maximum that I got was 15% per hours. My S7 is charging 30% per hours in the same config in more or less in all positions

- The USB-C is busy and you can't charge it easily in your car or at office without removing the patch.

--> It is waste of money.

The best should be to integrate the US G6 plate in the phone but several people already reported that it doesn't work on the DS version (missing connector pins on the mainboard).
[Xiaomi Redmi 4a ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other] muralivijay:
currently no rom link xda not supporting
[Xiaomi Redmi 4a ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other] Forever Alone:
No one's active here :(
[Xiaomi Redmi 4a ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other] LinuxPanda:
Because Redmi 4A got its own section only this week.
[Xiaomi Redmi 4a ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other] SanketMohapatra:
I have already seen that redmi 2 has developers developing Android go up on it that means the development of the lineage OS 15 can now be started on this device.

So anybody up for it?
[Xiaomi Redmi 4a ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other] gregbradley:
Thread closed

No placeholder threads.

Please PM when you have something to share.
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DeltaReloadX:
I have an S6 edge which runs android 7. For a while I've been using Samsung's 'private mode" and I used to save a ton of pictures there. While I was using it, I also had root. Since xposed for android 7 just launched, i thought it would be a good ideea to install it. Two days ago I flashed TWRP and I also installed xposed. It all went good and smoothly, I also installed a couple of modules, but when I tried to acces private mode, it states "Failed to enable private mode, try again". I did my research and I found out from various websites that TWRP and xposed are the ones to blame (duh). I deleted xposed, unrooted and installed the original recovery, yet, private mode still couldn't be accessed. I found some solutions to my problem on the internet, but all of them require me to delete all the files there, and I really want them back. Are there any chances for me to get those files back and if so, how ?
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Altamash Parwaiz:
Simply restart your device... i suffered from same problem.. but fortunately my battery was dead and i got the idea... and ive tried it couple of times too
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions & Answers] Umbra.:
Hi everyone,

I made a near identical thread a few days ago in the general S7 forum before I'd realized there's a carrier specific sub-forum. I figure if there's anyone up-to-date with updates and rooting the Verizon S7 they'd be here.

I have a Verizon S7 flat (G930V). I bought it sometime mid-2016 and it's rooted with the eng kernel on 6.0.1. The baseband is G930VVRU4API3. The bootloader is locked and obviously that's very limiting.

I really enjoy the added functionality that comes rooting, but sometimes the phone hangs randomly and becomes unresponsive seemingly for no reason. I was wondering if there's a better experience to be had by updating to 7.0+, preferably with root.

What are my options now in Q4 of 2017? What's the deal with the "U" firmware? Is there a non-eng way of rooting or any one that doesn't bog down the phone so much, or is non-rooted the only way to go? Can I go from where I am now to where I want to be without wiping my phone, or is that needed/recommended? If I upgrade, am I stuck there or can I revert if it ends up being a worse experience?

Sorry for all the questions. For my past Android devices this info was pretty cut and dry, but it's hard figuring out what's the latest or most well received methods for this device.

Thank you for any direction you might be able to provide me.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions & Answers] nyr2k2:
All the root methods that I am aware of utilize the eng-boot image, even on Nougat. So you're going to be susceptible to odd behavior and lags and freezes and all of that regardless of whether to stay on MM or go to N. Some have said they found the N experience a bit better. I haven't found that to be the case, but YMMV.

The U firmware essentially is just a version of the firmware without all the Verizon bloat built in, as well as a few other minor differences.

If you go upgrading or swapping firmwares it's always highly advisable to do a full wipe. I know it's a pain in the ass but if you use the home file to flash in Odin and save your data you often end up with a lot of problems that you wouldn't have otherwise.

---------- Post added at 11:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:26 AM ----------

Oh and as far as I know you can't go back to MM after going to N. Going to N, you update the bootloader, and with the locked bootloader you can't "roll it back" which is what you'd need to do to go to back to MM. That said, there's little reason not to go to N, you won't have a worse experience, maybe not any better but not any worse. IDK if there's an Xposed framework working for this phone on N, so if that's important to you it's something to be considered. Otherwise, it might be worth it to take the plunge.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions & Answers] Umbra.:
Thank you very much for addressing many of my concerns. So the only way to root nougat is with the engineers kernel, which is less than stellar. I won't be able to downgrade (but from what I hear stock 7.0 is about as good as it gets), and it does look like there's an xposed installation working on 7.0, which is something I forgot to consider and I'm super glad you thought of it, because I don't think rooting this phone is worth the hassle without the some xposed modules. So the U firmware is either carrier agnostic, or comes from one without so much bloat and works anyway. That's excellent to hear. I'll investigate, but do you know offhand if I can flash the verizon and and the U one back and forth without issue, or will I have to pick and choose now?

Thank you very much for the information. I really appreciate it.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions & Answers] irbaboon2o:
Stang

I had the same build as you and I just went to the stang5litre and it's pretty easy to do. I did a little reading on both root and stang and took me about an hour from start to finish. There is no bloat and very feature rich without having to mess around.