yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Questions & Answers] mhdazhar:
Is it possible to port Mi's stock music player to MIA1 ?
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Questions & Answers] Rawwr:
dude stop spamming in ROM section

this is for only roms

if you want an app go to apps section of this device's forum and ask there

this is the second time you have done this :|
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Questions & Answers] mhdazhar:
Sorry..i am not able to delete posts ?
[Xiaomi Mi 5 Questions & Answers] mamun11:
is there any way to configure fingerprint sensor or any physical button to receive incoming call???can it do by installing any exposed or anything?? I badly need it.I have a problem with touch screen.sometimes touch screen stop working and it occurs randomly. In that time I can't receive any call but fingerprint, and all physical button works fine.
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Guides, News, & Discussion] Aman301582:
Lift to check notification gesture was a great feature on my Nexus 5x. It is not present in mi A1 but I found an app called 'ambi turner' on play store. I configured this app to wake up ambient display when phone is taken out from pocket. I'm not sure what is the impact on battery life but seems okay so far. For all features (including lift to check) I had to buy full version but I'm satisfied with the free features. You can try this app if you miss lift to check gesture.
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Guides, News, & Discussion] Leong428:
It works well but I will have to report back on how it affects battery life. Thanks for sharing.
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Guides, News, & Discussion] jsharriz:
Can try gravity screen too.. works great wid mi A1.
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Guides, News, & Discussion] Leong428:
Battery life was affected with Ambi Turner.. it wasn't bad by any measure, but still noticeably enough that I had to uninstall it..

It was sipping about 1% an hour overnight, compared to 2% over 8 hours before I had it installed
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Guides, News, & Discussion] Aman301582:
Yeah you are right, I am also seeing a little drain on stand by. Other than that it works flawlessly.
[Xiaomi Mi A1 Guides, News, & Discussion] Ron1209:
I'd be happy to see it baked into Oreo with DT2W ambient display like the Pixel
[Android General] dadix4ef:
This sims to be like Google lens , visual search: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170817006094/en/Visual-Search-Open-Source

Repository GitHub: https://github.com/ZappenVDNS
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Questions and Answers] Wintrmte:
Hello -- I'm wondering if there is a launcher (not the Pixel launcher) that will bring up the list of favorited contacts when long pressing the phone icon?

The Pixel has this feature but I'm not a fan of their launcher.

Any suggestions?
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Questions and Answers] طوني تبولة:
Sesame Shorcuts + Nova launcher
[Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Questions and Answers] Wintrmte:
This is perfect!! Thank you!!!
[Phoenix OS News, Q&A & Development] rahjer:
I need some input (help) on doing an install of Phoenix OS as a stand alone system on a Chromebook or Chromebox. I can't seem to find the information I need.
[Phoenix OS News, Q&A & Development] Camlin3:
What kind of help
[Phoenix OS News, Q&A & Development] rahjer:
All I can find about Phoenix OS is making it a dual boot with Windows and Phoenix OS. I want it to be just a standalone single boot Phoenix OS.
[Phoenix OS News, Q&A & Development] Camlin3:
Extract iso to single parttition and let it boot
[Phoenix OS News, Q&A & Development] rahjer:
Let me clarify my previous post. I want to take an existing Windows machine totally wipe Windows off of it and only have one operating system on it which would be Phoenix OS. I have extracted the Phoenix iOS and create a bootable thumb drive. The only option that you get when you run that thumb drive is to install and it will install it to the thumb drive and make it a live installation off of the thumb drive not a single OS residing on the main hard drive.
[Phoenix OS News, Q&A & Development] deskjet390:
Just do what i did...haha

Take the hard drive out and slap it in an external enclosure.

Go to a windows machine and run your Phoenix OS installler and select the external hard drive letter and BOOM!!!
[Phoenix OS News, Q&A & Development] xxxamirxxx:
Hi! I was able to install Phoenix OS 2.5 on my HP Chromebook 11 G4.. everything works except for the audio..I've been searching the net for solution for a week now...

can someone help me? Thanks!
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Terrafaux:
For every one who can't wait, till the final release!

http://rapidshare.com/files/91822607/Opera_Mobile_9.5_Beta.cab.html
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] irus:
nice find im testing it right now looks pretty good
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] irus:
no youtube videos.... or at least not on mine
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] crazy cat:
Its better than PIE 6.1 so i´m happy with it.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] bibsnu:
wow

let me chk
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] nuttyphilt:
After installation does it appear in 'Remove programs'?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] chrisd1a1:
has anyone got this to work on WM5, keep getting unsuccesfull install. could anyone post the exe and dll's?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Skillie:
Any change of gettin it somewhere else Please?

Rapidshare is full whenever i try to download something Cool :-(
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] irus:
i was going to upload but once again i can't not sure why if some else could try to upload anyfile see if it works :(
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
Isn't this the exact same version that's discussed in this thread? And isn't it 9.33 rather than 9.5?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] ckl_88:
You need flashlite 3 on your phone to play youtube videos. Opera Mobile doesn't come with it.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
Thanks for this.Just downloaded this. Will test and give feedback.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] fards:
This is the same version as on the other thread, doesn't appear to be able to uninstall it.

looks like it dumps most of it's files in /application data/opera9

these are the registry keys it changes from setup.xml

<characteristic type="Registry">

<characteristic type="HKCR\_wgt_opwidget\Shell\Open\Command">

<parm name="" value=""\Windows\OperaL.exe" "%1"" datatype="string" />

</characteristic>

<characteristic type="HKLM\Software\Opera\Info">

<parm name="Splashscreen" value="\Windows\splash_218x170_a.png" datatype="string" />

</characteristic>

<characteristic type="HKCR\_wgt_opwidget\DefaultIcon">

<parm name="" value="%InstallDir%\Opera9.exe,-162" datatype="string" translation="install" />

</characteristic>

<characteristic type="HKCR\.wgt">

<parm name="" value="_wgt_opwidget" datatype="string" />
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Taninpv:
Can someone please verify that this is Opera 9.5 and not 9.33.

Thanks
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] irus:
its opera 9.33
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
How can we tell? There isnt the usual about screen.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] chrisd1a1:
yup its the same one

this is the pre 9.5 release
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] geek78:
very nice but netfront 3.5 is still better
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
How is Netfront better? Maybe it has less bugs, but that's only natural since this Opera version is an unofficial leaked version of an early alpha or something.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Lutek II:
I think the same :-)

I think that NetFornt 3.5 has more, more better zoom and interface
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Lutek II:
I'm an owner of Opera 8.65 and I'm testing Netfront 3.5 from two days but I see that this Netfront better fit text to read.

Maybe Opera will be better in the future (this spring) but now I think so...
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] samsul:
Netfront is useless

Netfront 3.5 ( or any other version ) requires large amount of memory available to work, I have difficulty in browsing more than 3/4 pages with about 10mb free.

I wouldn't recommend Netfront at all.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Confucious:
What device are you using??? On the Athena I have never had a problem with Netfront and think it is sooo much better than anything else available at the moment - but I haven't tried Opera 9.5 yet
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Chainfire:
-NVM- edit -NVM-
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] osavioro:
And what will you recommend if i may ask ?

Is there any alternative (rendering on device -- not on server) ?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
Yeah, but this is a thread about Opera 9.5. The comparison was supposed to be between 9.5 and Netfront. Opera 8 is old by now while Netfront 3.5 is all fresh and new, som the comparison is useless anyway.

So the question is not about Opera in general, but how Netfront 3.5 is better than Opera 9.5, if anyone thinks that this is the case.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Lutek II:
Is it for QVGA or VGA ?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
I've earlier done benchmark on four selected websites using various browser. I've now included Opera 9.33 in the test. Caution: Opera 9.33's webpages is different from all the rest since it is done today, whereas the rest were done about a week ago.

Web site: smh.com.au

Picsel browser: 65 sec

Pie with Pieplus: 84 sec

Opera 8.65: 52 sec

Opera mini 4: 26 sec

Netfront 3.5: 10 seconds

Opera 9.33: 56 seconds

Website: XDA-developers.com home page

Picsel browser: 28 seconds

Pieplus: 43 seconds

Opera 8.65: 30 seconds

Opera Mini: 32 seconds

Netfront 3.5: 23 seconds

Opera 9.33: 30 seconds

Website: ppcsg.com

Picsel browser: 58 sec

Pie with Pieplus: 59 sec

Opera 8.65: 57 sec

Opera mini 4: 32 sec

Netfront 3.5: 14 seconds

Opera 9.33:39 seconds

Website: cnet.com

Picsel browser: 77sec

Pie with Pieplus: 54 sec

Opera 8.65: 86 sec

Opera mini 4: 25 sec

Netfront 3.5: 16 seconds

Opera 9.33: 45 seconds

My signal strength varied between 2 to 4 bars when the test were done. You might get different number depending on your service provider and your signal strength.

Looks like so far Netfront is Infront.

Opera mobile does not allow Tengo SIP! Nothing appears when keys are pressed.:(

Opera does not allow me to copy the web address from one window and paste it in another window:(

Sometimes, I get a white screen with no indication of any problem when there is internal server error on the XDA sites; whereas Netfront gives me the internal error code immediately.

Opera mobile is more "finger friendly".

I hope Opera 9.5 solves all these problems and improves in speed.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
Tested at the same time or did you only test Opera this time around?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
I've found another version that can be uninstalled, and allows the use of Tengo SIP.

Have no idea if it is version 9.5. How do you check anyway?

http://rapidshare.com/files/91963252/Opera_Mobile_9.5_with_uninstall.cab.html
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
This time I only tested opera mobile 9.33
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
Memory usage:

Opera mobile 9: 8.5 mb

Netfront 3.5: 5.7 mb

If you run both applications side by side, netfront will still work, while opera would crawl.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
Yeah, except the Opera build is probably a debug build full of debug stuff since it isn't an official release in the first place.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
Let's hope so.

Earlier I said the version I posted could coexist with Tengo. It was prematured statement, unfortunately. It does'nt.

For now, the best browser is still clearly Netfront 3.5. Faster and less bugs. Let's hope 9.5 is different.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] wgary:
OK, I tried NetFront for a couple days and have now uninstalled it. It seemed to have problems loading pages -- an error pops up. I never had that with Opera 8 (which has been my main browser for several months) or even PIE. No matter its virtues, if it can't load pages it is useless.

Opera 9.5/9.33 seems a step forward from the previous version. I have adapted to it fairly quickly. The user interface is pretty usable. Pages are rendering well. It seems faster than 8.65.

Both Netfront and 9.5 seem to use a lot of memory. Hopefully they will do some more optimizing for the final releases of both of these. But if they can slim down 9.5 and pick up the speed a tad, I think I'll lean in that direction.

One question I have: I like the little search box in 9.5/9.33 that pops up when you click in the address bar. But this seems to default to Yahoo. Is there a way to reassign it? I'm not getting great results with Yahoo.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
What error did you see? Internal server error? I think that arises from the server, not the browser. I had that with all browser at times when using the xda website. The difference between opera and netfront is, opera gives a white screen and stop working, while netfront gives the error message saying there is an internal server error. I think that is the expected behavior rather thana white screen.

Both are still at beta at this stage, so anything can still happen between now and final version. Let's hope both improve. I'm likely to have both anyway. Opera is free,so there is no reason not to get it.

Both have their strengths. Opera is more finger friendly, and has buttons for common functions. Netfront is faster, more stable, less bugs, and richer in features. It can have google/yahoo search tool bar like in desktop browser. It can search for specific text within the current web page,which is very useful. edit: opera can too. It has more font sizes to choose from. It is able to use PIE's favourites and create the bookmarks automatically. It allows us to assign different browsing setting to each web page. Most important, it supports all the SIP I'm using, whereas opera does not (already two of my SIP do not work work opera).

That's why for NOW, my vote does to netfront. Tomorrow? I don't know.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] nuttyphilt:
The mobile version isn't free unfortunately.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] leoni1980:
It is a free upgrade if you've purchased it but not if it's included by the OEM. If a vendor includes it in a new ROM then the signed cab can easily be extracted but this is not legitimate from a moral or legal standpoint.

Opera will have to hurry up if they want a foothold. Netgear have released their BETA (which is excellent), Skyfire is on the horizon and Opera are still dithering about.

With regard to flash Skyfire is the only solution unfortunately. Looks like FL3 is only going to be released for Symbian users now, though this could change.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
It seems pretty clear to me that Opera is faster. Bugs are a result of it not even being at the beta stage yet...

Opera 9.5 can do that to, if you use the long hold menu.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
oh... you're right. Only the desktop version is free.

What the hack, I'll still buy both.

correction: opera does have the abioty to search in current web page.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] jessegreene:
The link seems to be dead. Just tried and got a file not found message.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] Mahmood:
here u go new link for download:

http://rapidshare.com/files/92092638/Opera_Mobile_9.5_Beta.cab
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] babak:
Hi guys

with opera 8.65 was possible to import your favorites from IE but this version does not seem possible, it is true?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] irus:
because its a beta
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] babak:
Thank you for your answer, it seems to be a nice Browser but for now, its place is the basket :)
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
Then I guess the test is a bit "buggy". Netfront is definitely NOT that fast compared to Opera. Opera has always been faster...
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
What does your test show? Would be interested to see your test result on Opera mobile 9.33's speed on those website. This is what you do. First, clear all your cache, then use a stop watch and start it when you press enter key. Then, when the website has completely finish all activities (no more in progress bar, and the the web pages no longer shifts), press stop again. Tell me what you manage to get on your device, on your HSDPA service provider. My device has close to 60 installed applications, so the result might differ from yours, but I'm more interested in the relative performance between the browsers. I get between 2 to 4 bars of signal strength, but I conducted all my tests at the same place. All the website that I used for testing were displaying in full mode (not the text or mobile version of the website).

If we stop the stop watch at the time when the webpage becomes first useable the time should be much less. Perhaps your impression is based on that time?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
Opera 9.5 is definitely the fastest browser out there now:

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

Then again, Netfront doesn't support as much stuff as Opera does so maybe it just loads less of the heavy duty CSS and JS stuff.

But your test has all sorts of possible errors. You said that you didn't test them at the same time. Also, the number of apps running in the background will make an impact especially since more memory means better performance.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
Ok, I concede that because the tests were done on different days, the web pages would not have stayed the same.

Now I have tested again, with only smh.com.au on the same day.

First reading is when the cache were cleared, and subsequent were when cache contents were permitted to stay:

Opera: 50 sec, 32 sec, 30 sec, 25 sec

Netfront: 49 sec, 25 sec, 22 sec, 30 sec

Note: Opera's time is stopped when the bar reaches the end, and Netfront's time is stopped when the spinning globe turns back into netfront logo.

The result brings them closer to each other in terms of performance, with Netfront marginally ahead still. I do notice that my previous time for netfront looks very low now. When I was still new to that thing, I could have mistaken activity to have stopped when the page appeared to have ceased activities. Netfront is more difficult to judge when webpage has completed rendering, unlike the rest which has a progress bar.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
Has anyone else encounter problem with writing a post with Opera? Tengo could not work with it. It is unable to accept a "space" input from Tengo. I have another keyboard having same problem.

Also, could someone tell me how I can check the Opera version? I now have three different cabs in my device, one which can be uninstalled, two cannot be installed. One of the later is VGA and QVGA sensitive, while another is only QVGA sensitive. The QVGA one has very large buttons. I'm not sure if they are all of the same version, as I could not find the usual "About" screen. If it is there, it is well hidden I must say. Large button is very finger friendly, but I can see only so few favourite items per screen. I think I prefer the VGA version more, although it is less finger friendly.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
Just came across an interesting article, explaining how complex it is to test the performance of a browser. Makes my tests looks extremely amaturist to say the least :o

http://nontroppo.org/timer/kestrel_tests/

Anyway, another thing that interests me in the above article is that it mentions 9.5's will use the "ECMAScript and DOM manipulation" to greatly improve speed, as compared to the 9.x

The browsers mentioned are the desktop browsers I think, but I hope it applies to the mobile version too.

This means there is hope for a faster 9.5. Faster than what we have now. :)
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] geek78:
Don't know if Opera 9.5 will be or not better than netfron 3.5 but i know that netfront 3.5 is better than Opera 9.33
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
No, that's not what it's saying. It's saying that the tests on that page will focus on those things.

Opera Mobile uses the same engine as Opera for desktop...
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
In what way?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
On desktop, Opera has always been my most favoured browser. However, it has never been the case on the mobile side. In the past I had always prefered PIE with piePlus over Opera 8.65.

As for the current versions of Opera vesus Netfront, it may come down to personal preference at the end of the day, but for me these are the reasons why I prefer Netfront 3.5 over Opera 9.33. Set aside the issue of speed where more scientific testing method is required to know for sure the difference, there are the following other differences which I have noted:

First, with Opera, two of my Software keyboard does not work.

Second, with Opera, I have to manually recreate all my favourites, whereas it is all there with Netfront.

Third, when there is an internal server error, both my desktop browser and netfront would show this error message. With Opera mobile 9.33 I get only a white screen.

Fourth: I like the google or yahoo toolbar similar to the desktop browser that is on top, ready for access.

Fifth, Netfront lets me associate a specific view setting to each saved bookmark. Very useful as I want a different view setting for different website depending on the layout. I can specify for example that for website A I wish to have normal view, while on website B I want smart rendering.

Sixth, Opera is more resource hungry. It requires more space for instllation. During execution, it also takes up more resources. When I have many active programs, Opera often freezes, whereas Netfront will still cruise along.

However, I like Opera's dedicated buttons for common functions. It is more finger friendly and efficient to operate.

I think both use progressive rendering which enables users to see and use the webpage even before all rendering are fully completed. This gives the feeling that the browser is faster than it actually is, I guess. Both of them use local rendering. Both displays webpages in other languages very well. Both can't do flash video. Both can't do Java applet based webpages.

I'm going to try out all the internet banking websites and see the difference. Would report back on that later.

What about you. What attracts you to Opera more so than Netfront?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
The thing about Opera using more resources I'd guess has to do with its better performance and the fact that it supports a lot more web technologies than Netfront.

Opera just works better with the web.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] eaglesteve:
I'm not sure about that. My measurement does not say that. All I know is that it freezes up and work very slowly when resources is low.

I have not tested all my internet banking website yet. It may work better. I will try out and let you know.

Anyway, which webpages have you found that work with Opera but not Netfront?

My main news webpage, smh.com.au, does not display correctly with Opera, but displays exacty like the desktop with Netfront.
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] EyeAmRubber:
What part of that site doesn't display correctly in Opera? Got a screenshot?