yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
[MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION]

one last boeffla kernel for Nougat was released :)

I guess your next update would also be the last for N then ;)

regards
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] kal4metal:
Not only the last boeffla kernel for N, but also the last boeffla for S5 altogether, as lord boeffla himself stops supporting it
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Mcha01:
Can you add oreo support ❤?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] pipapaule:
thanks. just installed it after going back to nougat. will report back if there are any problems.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] joey118:
Kltekdi pls?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] JohnDoe93:
Can you also make an updated version for klteduos (g900fd)? Last kernel you posted for duos is from 11/2017.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
hum klteKDI is up, let me remember how I did that duos build..
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
I'm struggling to learn how to point my github to get lineage updates itself instead of boeffla's (now that he won't be updating it anymore)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] andrew2432:
[MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION]

Hey if I'm using my 900p/kltespr as a WiFi only device, will this work?! Roms and stuffs do but a kernel....idk haha
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] sunilpaulmathew:
The easiest way in my opinion (that I always used to update my Kernels), is to simply "cherry pick" new commits from LOS kernel repo. By considering the changes in your repo over stock LOS, simple pull requests maynot work nicely (that you always (I guess) did from Lords boeffla's repo).
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
I never did this cherry picking thing.. I seldom use the web interface.. I had created a fork of andi's kernel and then on every update I run:

git fetch upstream

git merge upstream/boeffla_cm14​

then all differences from the last release were applied automagically..

now I was thinking how to tell git that my "upstream" should be other repo, and how to set from which commit onward it should fetch/sync... :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
idk too.. if you install it and it doesn't work, just install the ROM zip again, without any wipes, and you're back online
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] sunilpaulmathew:
Idk how to change the upstream repo, but I'm sure that your specified methods will work only if the commit history of both repo is significantly same (might be difficult in your case).

Regarding the cherry-pick side, you can do that by running

git fetch LOS-repo-link branch (e.g. git fetch https://github.com/LineageOS/android_kernel_samsung_msm8974 lineage-15.1)

git cherry-pick commit-id (available in commit url link) - for picking a specific commit

or

git cherry-pick first-commit-id..last-commit-id - for picking a series of commit​

It should work fine unless there is no git conflicts...
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] JohnDoe93:
Thx, tested it for the last two days. Works great so far. Both sim cards work and overall really smooth experience. I still have to test battery drain overnight but it should be fine, too. So you can probably attache g900fd kernel to OP as supported device. ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] limalvin1203:
Will you bring this to cm15?:confused:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] DavidRN:
This is one of the best kernels, a lot of strength, it allows the chip to reach 90 ° C like the old ones. It is different from current kernels that limit performance to 75 ° C and hamper heavy applications. you may have a slightly hot but the performance may be higher.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
When you're in a call and you occlude your phone's "presence" sensor, your display goes black, right?

But lately I noticed that even when it is black, the touchscreen is still working and then you "click" into everything on the screen.

Has anyone noticed that too? Maybe I've disabled something here on my kernel but it seems to be rom-related..
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] swiftbones74:
I have noticed that same behavior across several Los based ROMs recently, also noticed it happens on multiple kernels as well.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
I'm uploading a new version with a lot of things turned off. It includes the fingerprint sensor. It MAY be slightly faster and less drainy... please test!!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Mcha01:
Its magnificently fast! Wow
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fr3nz33:
Just wanted to add it's pretty solid, snappy and really solid idle power consumption
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] iPAQ 6515a User:
It's an uber kernel. Wow! The best ever
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Cuzeg Spiked:
Wow after many months of use with aicp 7.1.2 and this tuned kernel, I still don't feel slowdowns and the phone feels fast as ever, sometimes faster. Better Battery life over time and most definitely better ram usage. Gotta love 10 hours of battery life screen on time. Well approx 7-9 hours mostly but sometimes I can stretch more hours and the sleeps ofc are good too. Even after months, battery life didn't decrease all that much. Not kidding, the optimisation features of this kernel show well. Boeffla kernel was good but this kernel shines well.

Might update to Oreo eventually though and choose an Oreo kernel.

Edit: How about Intellithermal? Cooler temps would be decent even for full load but then again, temperature will always be warm at full load gaming anyway and the phone stays cool enough for non gaming after a decent undervolt.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jeremywh7:
In case anyone else was wondering, I tried the latest "build290518-TEST-klte" build on the 26may2018 unofficial 15.1 (just a spare/test device now - G900T)...not surprisingly, it didn't work. [MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION], any plans for 15.1 kernels in the near future? ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jeremywh7:
It would stick on the "Warranty bit: kernel" (or whatever it says) screen forever. Power button would not kill it either (at least after trying for 30sec); had to pull the battery. Tried rebooting, and also flashing again, just to verify; no love.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] sunilpaulmathew:
Not only this, none of the LOS-14.1 kernels will NOT boot on LOS 15.1 based ROMs. You guys should wait patiently till [MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION] releases his Oreo version.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jeremywh7:
We are waiting patiently, that's why I tested it on a non-primary device to help others, since the last mention of it was in January. ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Sickyman678:
I don't have fingerprint anymore.Is that supposed to happen?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Mcha01:
In the newest version. Yes
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
Why?

This would be a deal breaker to test that kernel.

Regards

Sent from my SM-G900F with Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Mcha01:
If you want the fingerprint reader, you can install the previous version its simple, he removed it to make phone faster and less drainy
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Sickyman678:
Which is the latest on with fingerprint?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Mcha01:
Build 23418 klte
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
Are you sure it drains more battery, even if fingerprint is deactivated in the menu? :confused:

I don't see any measurable difference in performance and battery lifetime between unlocking the screen with fingerprint or PIN..

what do you think [MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION] ?

regards
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Mcha01:
Idk for me the test version is faster and less drainy *not that big difference*
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
Ok, thanks for information.

I think I will test both builds, latest final and test build because there are no more updates in the test build I guess,

only some features are deactivated. :good:

regards
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
just installed 15.1 aospextended and it's a memory hog
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] LokifiedMee:
Lol
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jonezy82:
Any chance to port this to G870F?

I tried to compile from source with klteactivexx_defconfig from lineageos, but I'm getting lots of errors.

For example fs/ext4.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Henki98:
I noticed that in the test version was removed the otg. Is it a useless function?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
I'm trying to compile for 15.1 but getting on download mode only for now kkk it's hard to debug when it doesn't even boots..
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
Idk. Never used it. It was just a test build BTW.

Lots of stuff is active in Android kernel. Most of them will use resources one way or another
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
Thanks and thanks.. I'm working on it
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
The defconfig is the only thing needed for it?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
Don't give up bro,your kernel "it's a beast" ! :D

It's a life saver ! Thank you ! ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
It's like... OMG LMAO!!! :D:laugh::D
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jonezy82:
BoardConfig.mk:

TARGET_KERNEL_CONFIG := lineage_klteactivexx_defconfig

I can't find anything about VARIANT in LineageOS source.

Also, building for klte fails for same reason.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
Are you using "./bbuild-anykernel.sh a" ? I've just updated the github repo with latest changes (and some stuff disabled)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jonezy82:
I was using "./build_kernel.sh".

I'll try "./bbuild-anykernel.sh a" now.

I modified it a bit:

Result:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
gcc 4.9 ? I had a lot of trouble to make this source compatible with linaro 8... lol just try to use a newer "toolchain"

git clone https://bitbucket.org/matthewdalex/arm-eabi-8.x.git
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jonezy82:
Yes, gcc 4.9.

I'll try it.

Thank you.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
TEST build for LOS 15.1

see if everything works
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jeremywh7:
Installed and booted; first thing to note is that the phone booted incredibly fast, and that included having wiped Dalvik before rebooting to system. Now very curious to see the affect on battery, since the screen on battery usage of the default unofficial build is insane.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Ranniel:
You work very fast :laugh:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] vd69:
Is anyone having problems opening boefla settings app. When ever I try says there is no compatible kernel installed.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
with which version of tuned kernel? 15.1 ???
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] vd69:
Yes with 15.1 test version

---------- Post added at 05:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:04 PM ----------

Here are screens shots.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
Hey I used some stuff from your unofficial boeffla ;)

Do you know by which means boeffla app detects if the kernel is "compatible" or not?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Mcha01:
Did you try to clean app cache ans data from the app??
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
Same here.:p
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] vd69:
Yes i dit no luck.

klte crdroid 4,4 beta
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] bihslk:
Hello

Can i use this kernel with ViperOS Rom? It is Android 7.1.2
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
Yes ,go to first page ,second OP post .
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] bihslk:
I have G900F så this is the version i need?

tuned-kernel-4.1-LOS14.x-build230418-klte.zip
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
Yes ,G900f=klte ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] bihslk:
Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] yoahmad1995:
Auto rotate seems to be much stable on this kernel with latest official RR!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
Boeffla config app works for you?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] yoahmad1995:
It doesn't but boot animation lag seems to be fixed!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] sunilpaulmathew:
I think only Lord Boeffla know the exact criteria. However, from my experience, it will work if

1. The kernel name started with "Boeffla-Kernel" (I defined "LINUX_COMPILE_BY" to "Boeffla-Kernel-xxxxxx", see this file, line 56)

2. bcccontroller and other configuration stuff are available in the "ramdisk/res/"

and feel free to take any stuff from my repo... :good:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] LokifiedMee:
How is the performance on the test build for lin 15.1. Mine is Lagging All Over
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
I figured out the reason for the app not starting was the permission on /res not being 755 instead of 750 (or vice-versa).. lol

thanks anyway, your repo helped a lot!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
I feel aospextended 15.1 a bit snappier than the previous pure los14 I was using
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
LOS15 build is up.. boeffla app works.. but the default config (without even installing boeffla app) is perfect for everyone... ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] LokifiedMee:
Thank you thank you thank you. BTW which ROM Do You reccommend
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
Like [MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION] mentioned ,and I recommend AEX 15.1 ROM ,so far the best looking ,customizable ,stable ,battery friendly Oreo I find right now .;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] joey118:
Waiting for kltekdi :o
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jerfsonpaiva:
1. Can i use this kernel on my device and room?

Info on Attached Thumb.

2. How to install? Only flash via TWRP?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] iPAQ 6515a User:
Yes , you can. Just flash it through TWRP. Use LOS 14.1 version of the kernel
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jerfsonpaiva:
Ok. But, if i update the LOS to 15.1 i need install the kernel 15.1 first?

The diference of the kernel versions is the optimise to OS (14.1 or 15.1) or they be incompatible with the other?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
1. First install ROM 15.1 (Oreo 8.1) + gapps + magisk (optional), then reboot to system/install Boeffla config app/give root permission and remove Boeffla from battery optimization (not optimized),reboot again to recovery and flash kernel 15.1 for Oreo.

2. Compatible like this : 14.1 kernel for 7.1.2 Nougat / 15.1 kernel for 8.1 Oreo

OK?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] pmduper:
This project looks great!!

Any plans for a kltedv release?

Thanks [MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION] :good:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] firefoot007:
Hello,

Any plans for klteduos ver for los15.1?

Thankyou for your amazing working.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] PU8:
Is the fingerprint reader still deactivated with this kernel?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] J-Lindo:
I switched over to LOS 15.1 (with GApps and Magisk) to try out this kernel on my G900V. Everything seemed great, but mobile data was completely gone. Didn't even recognize the SIM card, no matter what I did. I'll investigate soon just at what stage it happened.

Think a logcat would help?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] flyinmama:
in your latest LOS 14 kernel version, the wake/sleep gestures have been removed?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Gbrl95:
Bug Report:

I've installed the test build for klte and experienced bug.

I'm using Resurrection Remix 7.1.2 and Magisk.

Network Speed Indicator settings are gone (only shows "hide arrow" switch)

Then I go back to previous klte tuned kernel and settings are here again.

Screenshots attached.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
Mine settings for traffic indicator was always there ,but nonfunctional (not show any traffic)

On previous you see numbers in status bar traffic?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Gbrl95:
Yes, it is working perfectly.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bosket:
Which one?

Solved 23.04.18 klte

Thanks ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Gbrl95:
There's seems to be a bug in display led. I've set it to low setting in replacement for screen filter and it is randomly resetting, it seems that it is not sticking into that setting. I need to manually go to boeffla config app and tick the close and on button. I hope there's a fix with this. Thank you!

---------- Post added at 03:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:57 PM ----------

Great! ?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
new 15.1 build is up for all variants
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fitittome:
Blistering speed compared to the previous version. Even boot up is nearly twice as fast as the standard kernel. Memory seems much better, noticeable at login. Great work! :good:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] swiftbones74:
OK I'll bite. Gonna check it out after work tomorrow. Sounds amazing.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] pmduper:
Thanks [MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION] for your work and support:good:

SM-G900I

Flashed "tuned-kernel-280618-CM15.1-kltedv.recovery" with RR and DotOS builds

Incredibly fast startup however occasionally it will boot with no mobile network available. A reboot usually fixes it.

Otherwise love it!

Edit - I should mention that Gapps and magisk are installed.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
ok beta14 released
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Sithhy™:
Installed it on CrDroid 3.6. Was a bit afraid of doing it at first since I'm out of home, but done it & the first feeling is that the phone seems to run better, it's snappier & maybe even a bit smoother?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] andip71:
[MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION]

I am very disappointed you base your kernel on my work, use my "brand name", but never asked if it is ok.

Moreover I am disappointed you do not even mention me in the contributors.

Interested in how you take this feedback.

Andi
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] 4naxagoras:
Does it also work for klteduos (G-900MD/G900FD), the dual chip S5s, or only klte (SM-G900F/SM-G900M/SM-G900AZ/SM-G900R4/SM-G900R7/SM-G900T/SM-G900V/SM-G900W8/SM-S902L)? I'm asking because they are two different versions of CM/LineageOS, not a unified one. Not sure if a kernel can do that but I would like to avoid bricking my phone.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
I can't speak for fbs. So this is my very personal opinion as a pure user of both kernels. Since I have been following the development of this kernel derivative from the beginning, I would say that it was not an evil intent, nor did fbs want to compromise you or steal your work. At the beginning it was just a kind of tinkering or an experiment to see if a good thing could be made even better or whether an error that seemed to exist at that time can be fixed. Which is also shown by the fact that he published his first version in your thread.

Personally, I would appreciate very much if the good ideas that fbs put into his kernel would be merged with your Boeffla kernel and there would be only ONE kernel again at some point. Fragmentation is actually hardly ever good for the end user. At the moment, the LOS stock kernel makes the system quite choppy and it is anything but powerful. You won't know that until you use the Boeffla Kernel. But meanwhile there is also a clear difference between the Boeffla Kernel and the Boeffla derivative from fbs. This is also shown by the fact that I have an average battery consumption of about 4-5%/h with the Boeffla Kernel when the display is switched off, but with the modification from fbs only 1.5-2%/h. Nevertheless, the smartphone runs even more smoothly with the kernel from fbs.

If it doesn't happen that both kernels become unified again, the opening post should of course clearly indicate what the connections are and the appropriate acknowledgements should be added! My humble opinion.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
I'm really sorry to disappoint you in any way :(, but it's totally mentioned in the OP, maybe not on the "contributors" title, but I can easily fix it. And in your thread you've said I could compile it the way I want and create a thread for it.. As ZoneZarm does.. We even talked together about it (you, me and zonezarm) on your thread.. :confused:

ps.: for the "brand name", I named the file and the title of this project with "boeffla" in it just to made OBVIOUS that it is a modification of your code.. I wouldn't find it right to call it "fbs kernel", like it was a totally new thing, as I just disabled some stuff and rewrote a LMK function.. but if you prefer I can totally get rid of "boeffla" part... It's totally up to you.. I don't know how sub/derivative-projects are used to be done here.. :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
Thanks for your kind words, testing and comprehension.. :good: :good:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fitittome:
The "Drool Baffles" Kernel. Its an anagram of Lord Boefflas. It could bring a smile. :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] dapat:
Helo. What to do with memorykiller.c file in the op? Is it to be used also in the system like overwriting any specific file?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] audianer:
i guess theres no support for the Kernel Tweak App from Boeffla Kernel?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] 10goto10:
Nothing, it's just the source code for other kernel developers looking to incorporate the changes to their own kernel builds.

You can still use Boeffla-Config for tweaking the kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] srtraky:
Runs smoth! Great work :good:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] KazuDante:
[MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION] could this be added to the tw versions of BoefflaKernel as well , for those who run S8 port roms ?

since its eol already one build with the mod would def improve it.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] craP_cillA:
boeffla just released beta 15.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
Which will be the last version until end of November as Andi is on vacation now. Maybe this kernel should be continued independently? Andi doesn't develop the S5 kernel anymore and only maintains the current commits. If fbs would do the same thing, the fbs kernel could become completely independent and it would not be necessary anymore to download the whole Boeffla package every week and to update all patches applied by fbs.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
don't need to rush these updates.. there has been a long time since anything really good
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
anyone could get my changes and put in TW version, but I won't.. :P
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Henki98:
For battery life screen on with light performance which governor is best between interactive - battery extreme, impulse, ondeman and smartmax ?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
According to what Lord Boeffla always said, the interactive is the only governor that's really reliable on Lineage 14.1.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
[MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION]: Will we have a beta15 by time? Waiting for it before flashing the new LOS version. Thanks a lot for your effort in advance!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
Hello,

I am using latest RR 5.8.5 by [MENTION=7759939]Brunowp8[/MENTION]

I am testing your latest final kernel for N [MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION] but everytime I open boeffla config I got the error message attached.

What can I do?

regards
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
it's just a warning and you can ignore it
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fbs:
Does this happen with rom's default kernel?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] pmduper:
No it doesn't.

Otherwise very impressed :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] DKAngel:
so was just checking this thread out, i have LOS 15.1 unofficial installed, what would this custom kernal bring over the default one?