[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Linuxephus™:
You "see" little information that justifies you changing your mind my friend. ;)

That article was also referenced directly to myself from a colleague associated with the EFF that provides direct information as to non-liability and the measures generally taken by law enforcement of any country in pursuit of investigating alleged criminal activity. Clearly stating non-liability for "Providers" to the extent that logs of activities of users are requested for investigation provided the "Provider" keeps those logs. At no point in the article nor the pursuant comment did such infer or imply the contrary. You cannot be listed as a "Provider" by any interpretation of the law, regardless of what country, even though you provide a service using space leased from an international host for your own personal use. Which in this case is to provide access as a VPN. Applicable law on an international level still applies with a *certainty* despite your choice to remain *uncertain* at a potential risk (the ideal or fear of unrealistic consequences) being dealt your way. That alone, as stated before, is your right in so doing. Nonetheless, your remaining uncertainty by no means calls into question any professional information provided and explained. This is not a proof of concept, let alone a theory which fails to fit the facts. It is law given fact, no matter your choice to remain uncertain good sir. And should you have no logs for investigation, law enforcement of any country must then proceed directly to the ISP of the resident hosting country of those servers (singular or plural) which's where they would start to begin with. And above all, you are a professional software developer with little to no experience with matters of law, let alone the conjecture of that law to qualify what is or is not law. I personally have provided absolutely every means needed to cover all aspects of your inquiries and implied inquiries. Your choice to remain uncertain is a choice be that as it may. Which is not a failing of the information provided, but a choice of yours to remain uncertain in lieu of that given information. As for myself, I don't care to publicize my personal profession even though that very matter can be inferred. And rest assured, the information you have been given is professional, not the appearance there of. Your own educated guess (I would state decision, yet an educated decision revolves around a decision being made with information provided) remains yours to make.

P.s.-To You The Reader: This by no means should be looked upon unfavorably. The Author has every right to make a choice of continuance or discontinuing with a project that he solely owns. I merely wish for Mr. Marcel to be absolutely informed, no matter the decision made.

Already addressed in the above comment and previous conversation.

---------- Post added at 11:34 ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 ----------

Nor can they guarantee that you even have a problem (reference previous conversation) other than creating a non-existential problem based in fear of what is perceived to be unknown. That is the reality. Naught more than that. And truth be told, there remains more information stating the contrary than there is regarding your own fears. Again however, yes, it remains your decision nonetheless my friend.

Inquiry: Might I now be freed to galavant elsewhere upon less serious matters? Just say "Yes" that I might be about other matters not involving you reading my novel lengthed comments whilst wanting to mash your keyboard in exasperation.