yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Makshow:
Such an excellent kernel! It's rock solid and I have the best battery life of all kernels I used so far. It was great to have 60% at the end of the working day (usually I have 50% left or less, I also upgraded to latest LOS Nijel8, so that's good too). Also, this kernel has very good zRAM usage, it uses whole virtual swap file of 728 MB I set in settings, while stock kernel used 200-300 MB and Harfix RC 2.2 couldn't use zRAM at all. Mutitasking is a breeze now!

Can you tell me, how I can enable core_ctl on this kernel? On LOS Nijel8 there is setting in Battery - Power Saving and Performance, on RR one can add in build.prop string "persist.sys.cpu.core_ctl=1". But this method doesn't work on ROMs that aren't Nijel8. On NitrogenOS, for example.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] zobanen:
I have install v1.3. No Fast USB Charging found. It is very useful feature for phone modem using or charging from USB 3.0 ports: up to 0.9A current instead of standart 0.5A. (0.84A instead of 0.44 by my measurements).
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] nijel8:
On non-Nijel8 roms ;) you have to load the module first by running this command in terminal:

/system/bin/insmod /system/lib/modules/core_ctl.ko

And then set the core_ctl tunables as per your liking:

function write() {
echo -n $2 > $1
}

# Configure core_ctl for power cluster
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/not_preferred "1 1 1 1"
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/min_cpus 4
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/max_cpus 4
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/busy_up_thres 78
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/busy_down_thres 55

# Configure core_ctl for perf cluster
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/not_preferred "1 0"
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/min_cpus 1
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/max_cpus 2
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/busy_up_thres 68
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/busy_down_thres 40
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/offline_delay_ms 100
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/task_thres 4
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/is_big_cluster 1

You need to do it after any restart, so it's up to you to automate it...
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Zola III:
Would be a much better to capitalise on RAM usage (davlik VM) than introducing any other swap type & their is room for improvement there.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Makshow:
Great! That's very handy to know!

Can I unpack the kernel, edit some init script and pack it back to set this module load on boot? I don't want to mess with tasker, just flash-and-forget. What file should I edit if that's possible?

---------- Post added at 20:20 ---------- Previous post was at 20:16 ----------

That's true, of course, iPhone can hold as much of background tasks as Android phone with twice as amount of RAM. Definitely there's room for improvement.

(Well, iOS still doesn't know how to send files over Bluetooth, so nobody's perfect)
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Zola III:
No it can't! iOS is deaf for suspended to RAM, it basically starts apps again and again from storage. On the other hand Linux memory subsystem is made as a pool & not used RAM is a waisted one. Prepatch for execution is around 100x faster from RAM then it is from NAND storage. With Android most part of the problem in the equation is that there are so many dumb idiotic process's that we'll unnecessarily spill the pool. One of the main reasons for the Linux dominant on server field is it's RAM management as difference becomes huge when you have high parallel many processing blocks accelerators/CPU system while for some bandwidth is a priority (GPU's) for majority of others it's the latency (FPGA's, DSP's, ASICS along with HBM & HMC). That's why the future held the Linux (including Intel and MS) & not a basterd's stolen things as anything Apple ever sell.

& at the end just remember "we will set you free".
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] nijel8:
Yes you can, in. any *. rc file let say in "on boot" section put these lines:

exec - root root -- /system/bin/insmod /system/lib/modules/core_ctl.ko

# Configure core_ctl for power cluster
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/not_preferred "1 1 1 1"
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/min_cpus 4
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/max_cpus 4
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/busy_up_thres 78
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/core_ctl/busy_down_thres 55

# Configure core_ctl for perf cluster
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/not_preferred "1 0"
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/min_cpus 1
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/max_cpus 2
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/busy_up_thres 68
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/busy_down_thres 40
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/offline_delay_ms 100
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/task_thres 4
write /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/core_ctl/is_big_cluster 1

Android init even has built-in command for loading kernel modules so you can use it instead of the generic exec and insmod binary. From https://android.googlesource.com/platform/system/core/+/master/init/README.md:
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Fenomenoide:
hey can add support to faux sound and kcal ? thx for your work
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Kubix99:
Read changelog
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] flor90:
Please, in your next update, add a feature to raise the volume for the earpiece. Thanks in advance!
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Kubix99:
I don`t even know if there will be any updates, I`m swiching to OnePlus5.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] flor90:
That's too bad. It's a great kernel...
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Kubix99:
Just better than stock.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] khnoizer:
This kernel meant for nougat roms, there is not much point to keep developing this while we're all currently waiting for oreo. :)
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] E90 Commie:
I have one question:

Is it OK to add gamepad support before moving off the project in favor of the OP5?

It seems like several Max kernels lack it and I tried to sideload the xpad.ko module without success.

Thanks in advance.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] flor90:
Oreo has a long way to go until it'll get stable. I'm sure most of custom ROM users will still use Nougat
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
In my think mi max will never get fully stable Oreo where phone still don't have stable Nougat.

I laughs when I see "stable" Nougat rom for this phone.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Zola III:
OK start laughing right now!

I always only work with one person & result is always the same the best costume ROM that their is for that device & I set my standards high, higher than firmware. As it is nijel8 unofficial LineageOS is close of achieving this goal actually all it needs is a proper tuning. As for Oreo you are probably right as without 3.18.y kernel their won't be one properly manageable those just patched enough to somehow run I disregard. But the bright side is that Oreo doesn't bring much new & certainly nothing crucial it's main advantage is drifting closer to the mainline & a price we will have to pay.

It is ironic that deaf & blind man (as you & me) significant contributed to this device but never the less fact.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] nijel8:
What do you know... Not even having the phone...

Bullhead is using 3.10.y and has official Oreo support so what's the problem!?
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Skalexs:
XD It was a low blow
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] ayenzel:
Thank u so much for this kernel. After using this kernel my battery life is great and has improve so much. Im using it with R. R 5.8.5.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] ZainBilq:
It can't get better than this...SOT of more than 10 hours on Mi Max with 1.3 plus govtuner..thanks [MENTION=5396841]rafciowis1999[/MENTION]
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Zola III:
Let me ask you how many CVE's did you patch? Not much. Let me tell you how actually kernel accounts only for some 15% of needed security/vulnerability patches, all the rest is accounted in to the vendor property libs.

Official by who? Dan's maintainer. Certainly not Google or LG nor QC.

Thing is without kernel version I'd their is no treble updates, with faked versions their is possibility for bobble treble after update (that it bricks something as it whosent ment to work with). Google supports 3.18 as a bare minimum while general recommendations go for at least 4.4 or desirable 4.8.

That's the short story, this is a mid one:

https://www.linux.com/news/2017/9/a...ernel-requirements-and-new-hardening-features

For the rest use your imagination.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] flor90:
I don't agree with you. I think nougat is daily driver, and oreo will be also, but it'll take some time, because there are lots of good devs working on it. Hope you'll keep your MiMax, and continue developing great kernels for oreo too. But till then, advise me please how to increase the earpiece volume, because it is annoyingly low. Thanks!
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
Kubix and I are in the same class and We spend about half day together. I had oneplus3 for one year and oneplus5 for about 4 months. I can always compare my phone with kubix's mi max. I'm not talking about performance or mulitasking or something but for system stable and bugs. He often tells me a new bugs that annoying him. About 4 weeks after oneplus5 released there was FULLY STABLE rom. Mi max still have so much bugs. And Yes, nougat is good for daily driver because there is no better roms for that. So i don't own that device but I see and use it almost everyday and about that stable rom can confirm Kubix which see and use my oneplus. You guys need to grab other phone with stable roms and then say something like this.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] E90 Commie:
I wonder what bugs we are talking about?

I haven't noticed anything amiss on my device (such as camera issues, audio issues, instability etc). It just... works.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Zola III:
Well actually RN3 (Kenzo) have more development than either OP3 or 5 & it's base is used for Mi max, but that is not an issue hire. You are very childish if you think that problems with property binary blobs don't affects us all & how you & I along with everyone hire can do much about it. That is a single only purpose of Oreo. The rest is mostly ironed out I personally persuade a anomaly (as I don't know anymore how to call it) which brakes complete task management & it's globally present so not only presents on Android but Linux it self. I am not the only one but whole Linux community is trying to do the same & it is bean going on for years & there ware at least 100 fix tris so far (& from much more capable people than anyone hire at XDA) from bringing cores on more early (back in 2013) to ensuring EL registers are properly set & ahead of time (a month ago). Same anomaly bricks your: net, softirq handling, make stalls in operating & cetera. So don't tell me how it's all roses out there and for a some specific device. Me by I look like a f***ing Don Quixote to you but I don't mind.

By the way I am personally disappointed with you as you never did look at my comment on your Github. But that's your lose.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
I looks at Your comments but that was time when Kubix released a version so I don't have a time to do something with this.

I'm not said about linux problem and all androids but for example not working flac a some time ago.

I don't look at You as worst or there bad things, all people know what know and have own opinions.

What is Don Quixote? XD

And this bull**** conversation is unnecessary...
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Zola III:
Well CM is well known for years for it's screwed-up's in mediacodecs.hml. So you are really surprised that they did it once more? I like AOSP for lack of bullshits and least bugs. Neither of us hire don't tend to really build the ROM side by them self nor even contribute to it much. Kernel & device trees are only thing being worked on. As it is every child ROM inherit it's parents bugs & multiply their number with added futures. If you didn't learn by now regardless of the platform for multimedia use player's that use ffmpeg unchanged libs by their own as that is most guaranteed to work as it should.

Please try to work a little bit more on your general education.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Quixote
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] nijel8:
...official means Google. It's their device, right? They released a few Oreo factory images for bullhead already don't see your 3.10-kernel-bad-for-Oreo point really...

kubix must be using wrong rom then... Tell me one Mi Max as device specific bug... Not talking about the usual rom bugs every device can experience. I'll tell you... there's no left that I know of. And I am pretty sure I know...

There is only one problem with Mi Max - not much popular device so lack of good devs dedicated to their work which might be a problem for bringing up Oreo faster.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Zola III:
Well then tell me what is Oreo without Project Treble?

You don't suppose their will be any updates for unsupported version of the kernel or that any vendor will make such?

If you fake kernel version (which can be easily done) & for instance update Adreno blobs you will get a dead brick as kernel infrastructure (if header only) don't match.

3.10 isn't bad but it's just DOA.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] nijel8:
Well, that's up to Xiaomi, which means most likely never, but we can do without Treble...
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Zola III:
It's much more up to Qualcomm and almost certainly never.

Google is doing it to force vendors trough OEM's to keep up.

We can without Treble & we can & without Oreo (as that is a main stand point of it). Their is no real useful major standpoints in Oreo...
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Makshow:
Well. i decided to try AOSP Extended ROM and with this kernel I don't have neither hotplug nor zRAM from the box. I already know how to enable hotplug, can you kindly tell me how to enable zRAM also? Is there some build.prop edit?

---------- Post added at 23:42 ---------- Previous post was at 23:19 ----------

Oh, well, build.prop edit isn't helping on AOSP Extended ROM, it's AOSP-based obviously. And terminal command returns error:

Can I humbly ask kernel developers to make next build with hotplug and zRAM modules enabled by default? Whoever will be using your kernel should be a poweruser who knows what these things are.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] nijel8:
Kernel has core_ctl.ko and copies it to that location... You must be doing something wrong.

For zRAM on run these commands on by one:

write /sys/block/zram0/max_comp_streams 4
write /sys/block/zram0/comp_algorithm lz4
write /proc/sys/vm/swappiness 100
write /sys/block/zram0/disksize 512M
mkswap /dev/block/zram0
swapon /dev/block/zram0 -p 32758
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Makshow:
Well, you're right.

AOSP Extended is a Nijel8-based ROM even if it's AOSP-based too. I tried to edit kernel configuration by init.qcom.power.rc file in kernel ramdisk, but there is cpu.conf file on system/etc/cpu, and when I edit that file, zRAM and hotplug are working fine, no need to patch build.prop or to write terminal commands.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Melencolia11514:
It can be worked in Miui9?
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] iaio72:
+1
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Melencolia11514:
Developer?
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] zhukry:
I hope it work for miui too
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] LiviiYS:
Doesn't
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] akubaek:
How to enablr hotplug.. any tutorial?
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Rajdeep Madasu:
please build oreo kernel
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] jerrygoh389:
Ya. Pls build RR oreo pls.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
Maybe I will do this but not now. Don't have enough time.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] jerrygoh389:
No worry. I can wait for the good news thanks in advance
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] jerrygoh389:
No worry. I have nothing but time. Cheerd
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
What do You guys want in the kernel? And on which base because I don't see any clean source for kernel on oreo. Or maybe miui on oreo?

Edit: there is unofficial linageos os on oreo but I don't know. I don't on that device so You guys need to tell me.

Kernel base should be the stablest kernel.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] zhukry:
I wish u make for 7.0 miui based rom
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] afridi.shahriar:
I have a request.

MIUI 9 (nougat 7.0) doesn't support f2fs for /data.

Even of u can't manully mount f2fs microsd! (Using "mount -t f2fs /dev/block/mmcblk1p1).

So, can u plz add f2fs support in ur kernel, which can be flashed over miui9-7.0 rom? Please
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
Ok, I will try miui 7.0 but this will need lot of tests because I think WiFi is not included in source.

About f2fs I can try too but I have bad opinion about that. In Old days I lose all my important files because f2fs corrupted. But ok, I will try this f2fs on data too.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] afridi.shahriar:
Ok. Thank u soooo much.

Btw, for me, i dont need Wi-Fi, only f2fs is needed.

Even if only f2fs for microsd, still enough for me.

Bcz, i have formatted my 128gb microSDXC with f2fs filesystem.

(Bcz, fat32 is prone to data corruption, and, exfat is also non-journal filesystem + exfat is not supported by many roms. Where, f2fs is recommended by google for adoptable storage, if device kernel supports it. So, it has a better possibilities in future)

#

According to AOSP suggestions:

Adopted devices must be formatted with a filesystem that supports POSIX permissions and extended attributes, such as ext4 or f2fs. For optimal performance, the f2fs filesystem is recommended for flash-based storage devices

#

Yes. F2FS is less stable than ext4.

But, ext4 tears out the sdcard more, as it's made for rotational storage.

Now, f2fs is made for flash devices.

And, yes. F2FS may also corrupt.

But, in a sudden removal/power cut, f2fs is better than FAT FS.

And, ext4 is better than f2fs for data corruption.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
Ext4 is enough stable for me in my daily setup (oneplus5t) and about ExFAT I can add it to kernel to support it.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] afridi.shahriar:
Yeah .

I'm requesting you to add f2fs.

as i use f2fs for microsd (supports f2fs microsd even without root, in Oreo 8.1.0)

And, i think, miui rom really lacks of it
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] pg8286:
No fast charging in this kernel. Atleast i dont find any option to enable. If it is present prove it or else remove 'fast charging' from description.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] nafas2000:
hi dear dev this is kenzo kernels pls add some features from this kernels

https://xdaforums.com/redmi-note-3/development/kernel-t3414884

https://xdaforums.com/redmi-note-3/development/kernel-02-10-2016-agni-purecm-n-v1-7-t3472640

https://xdaforums.com/redmi-note-3/development/kernel-icecoldkernel-v0-1-t3648392
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] sohyang:
[No message]
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
First test will be propobly at the weekend.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Melencolia11514:
Waiting for you so long:crying:
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
Sorry but I have so much other things to do that is more important then kernel. :/
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] zhukry:
will it be miui based rom kernel?
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
Can You guys change rom base because miui is the worst code which I ever seen. Can You test which rom simply WORKS without any problems, bugs? I prefere linageos but I don't see latest official linageos.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] k4rn8g3:
Go for lineageos 14.1 by [MENTION=4399618]nijel8[/MENTION]
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] nafas2000:
lineageos 14.1 by [MENTION=4399618]nijel8[/MENTION] is the best
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] :
Is this project alive, are u gonna update the kernel ?
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] raymondsanusi:
Seriously..?

Just read a few pages back..

Edit : sorry i dont know theres 2 threads..

Here's updated version

https://xdaforums.com/mi-max/development/kernel-harfix4-t3534625
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] :
Yup, I know that the OP has uploaded Harfix4 test builds but I am talking about HarfixKubix kernel. Is the Harfix4 a seperate kernel or is it an upgraded version of HarfixKubix?
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
Harfix4 is my own kernel, HK is my and [MENTION=7392998]Kubix99[/MENTION] kernel. Kubix only tests kernel and grab commits that looks interesting so HK is very unclear and have lot of useless changes. Kubix no more have mi max.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] :
Oh! Ok, but I really liked HarfixKubix. It improved battery life of nijel8 ROM and most importantly it made the fingerprint sensor much more responsive and accurate. In every ROM I have tried without HarfixKubix, fingerprint sensor gave incorrect fingerprints or finger moved too fast error messages unnecessarily. Please make those optimisations in Harfix4 also. I will test and review your new kernel very soon. Thanks a lot for your hard work and time.
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] afridi.shahriar:
Can u plz update this kernel for f2fa microSD support for miui 9 roms??
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] Wisniew:
Can You guys STOP asking for updates in this kernel??

This kernel is EOL so I will work on harfix4 or nothing...
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] k4rn8g3:
I think u should ask mods to remove this thread..
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] ishwar110594:
[MENTION=5396841]rafciowis1999[/MENTION] does it support oreo 8.1? For RR 6.0 for helium?
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] jerrygoh389:
File no longer can download bro
[Xiaomi Mi Max ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other D] _firewall_:
Here is a link from initial post:

https://openload.co/f/AL8pmrsasSw/HK--1.3.zip

It's currently working.

Otherwise, here is a file for you: View attachment HK--1.3.zip
[OnePlus 3T Questions & Answers] Crank3d_I3:
Hey, i have a problem with opening certain apps. When i try to open them, they close instantly and are not shown in the recent apps. Sometimes it works after crashing a few times, but sometimes it keeps crashing. It also happens when clicking on a notification sometimes.

The apps crashing the most are YouTube, Maps, WeatherOnline and Snapchat.

The notifications crashing the most are Gmail and Instagram.

My phone runs on OxygenOS 4.1.7, is rooted and i use a few xposed modules (Screenshot delay remover, Native clipboard, Notification Slider, Amplify)