yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Well, here you go. :)

But mind you, maybe it's something else...

EDIT: Attachement removed. Kernel not booting.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ..-=S.O.R.i.X=-..:
WOW, will test asap.

Thank you very much.

I will test the F2FS Filesystem because this was a great feature on my old JIAYU S3 with very good effect on speed
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ..-=S.O.R.i.X=-..:
:crying::crying: phone isn't booting

tested without and with wiping chache/dalvik

restored original boot.img from MoKee and everything is working again.

see attached the original boot.img from MoKee ROM Nightly 20180327, maybe it is usefull for somebody
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Terminator.J:
For what it's worth, I've done testing with TWRP that supported F2FS doing a nandroid backup of /data on a fresh install, once when formatted with ext4 and once with F2FS... the result was less than a second difference (data size was 400 or so megabytes) with the same MB/sec reported for imaging the partitions. So maybe on older eMMC you got more of a speed difference with a more optimized file system, but honestly the fact that we have UFS storage in the first place means we see very little real-world performance difference between ext4 & F2FS. I really wouldn't worry about it if there's features you want in a custom ROM that only supports ext4.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Thanks for reporting! I wanted to try f2fs for a long time, but never gotten around it because of the hassle involved., especially when switching ROMs frequently. Also I was skeptical about the gains to be had and your measurements confirm that. I'l just forget about f2fs, at least for now. :)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Hmm, sorry to hear that. I haven't tested it, was really just a long shot., apparently unsuccessful.

I'm going to have a deeper look at Mokee with the next iteration of ROM releases. As said, the real goal is a "unified" kernel, working without modification on AEX/Cosmic/RR, now include Mokee. No guarantee it will be possible though. At first, we have to wait for the new releases, then I'll have to look at the kernels and hopefully it will be possible to build one, working on all of them.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
So I was looking a bit into how to create a more power-efficient setup for our SD820 device.

What I really don't understand is why SD820/SD821 was clustered the way it is? I mean, the 2 silver (=little) cores seem to be _less_ efficient (= needing more power) than the 2 gold (=big) cores for all frequencies in which they overlap. And this is a very wide band from >0 to ~1,8Ghz.

In the past, i.e. classic big-little architecture like SD810, little cores provided worse performance than their big sibling when running on the same frequency. But they had the advantage of consuming significantly less power while doing so, leading to better efficiency within a certain frequency band. It was the classic tradeoff between performance vs. power consumption, providing some intrinsic crossover point, where it was "better" in every sense to migrate a running process from little to big and vice versa.

Not the case for SD820/821. Silver and gold cores provide (nearly) equal performance when running on the same freq (both are Kryo cores!), but now the silver cores actually require slightly _more_ power to do so. WTF!?

Makes me wonder what's the purpose of these silver cores at all? Why was SD820 designed this way? Why not just implement 4 gold cores?

And why do all ROMs/Kernels/Stock ROMs designate the silver cores as #0/#1 (default core for new processes, handling interrupts, etc)? Imo it would have made much more sense to use the gold cores as "default" and just keep the silver cores around as backup when more processing power is required. But in every actual implementaion I've seen, it's exactly the other way around. Why?

Sorry for the ramble, but don't know where else to put this. And maybe someone wants to comment. Am I wrong?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] theorland:
How about you use the factory stock kernel configuration first, and use it as battery optimized first,

and start tweak from that as the base ?

just suggestion, when we don't know which one is the better
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] XDAMz:
My cpu default voltage
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Huh, that's pretty low on voltage. Really stable? Surviving latest Antutu?

How about voltages for the pwr-cluster?

Maybe you can post your complete /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/UV_mV_table.

e.g. from a console shell

cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/UV_mV_table > /sdcard/UV_table.txt

Then grab the file UV_table.txt from you sdcard and attach it here. Thanks!
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ikram.senguen:
Yup same here, -100mhz is the least stable setting I could use. Together with oc. I'll tell how battery friendly while stable is will be after using about some time.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] XDAMz:
Thank you for your pay:D
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ikram.senguen:
Turns out not stable at all. I go back and try with different settings and report
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] XDAMz:
Each person's CPU physique is different and may be better for me:(
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
void5.1bat released - AEX 5.3 only

I know, somewhat bad timing with Treble-ROMs coming up soon, but anyway, I'm releasing a special battery optimized version of my kernel, void5.1bat, see first post for download. ONLY FOR AEX 5.3 right now, sorry.

"Optimized" in this case really just means underclocked by default, but you can change that on runtime via /sys/module/msm_performance/parameters/void_underfreq.

The default setting of '1' sets CPU max 1.4/1.92, GPU max 510 MHz. Setting to '0' turns these restrictions off and allows CPU to max 1.67/2.23 (mild overclock), GPU to max 653 MHz. (Really like the void5 non-ocx version, but with slightly lower CPU clocks.)

I strongly recommend executing

/system/etc/void_tuning.sh horse

after boot! You can also try 'mix', and tell me if you think there's any difference...

For those who want to play around with CPU voltages note that for now I'm sticking with the default values. Actually, I'm not that sure how much is to be gained from lowering voltages a few tens of mV, probably not all that much and thus not worth risking instability. But well, you test and tell me. :)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mindkiller_18:
faced three times blue LED on this version. with and without execution of 'horse'. Didn't try mix though. But now returned back to oc which is stable
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] P4ulRabbit:
What application do I use to run this code?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mindkiller_18:
I am using fx file explorer to execute it. Pretty simple!
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Dragonaut4:
Need root, like SU or Magisk?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mindkiller_18:
yes definately needs a root. and I think you will need the pro version of fx explorer or just use ex file explorer. That will also do the same think in free version (I hope so)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
horse or mix won't change anything in terms of stability.

But strange, I don't understand how this version can crash but void5oc is running without problems. Anyone else having stability issues with void5.1bat?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mindkiller_18:
I can try it once more and report back :)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
The straight-forward way (apart from adb shell from your computer) would be to use something like "Terminal Emulator for Android". And yes, needs root, so:

su
/system/etc/void_tuning.sh horse

Or you can find some app automating it on every boot. I think Kernel Adiutor could also do it.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
If it really is reproducible, you can try booting the stable void5oc and manually set CPU max to 1.4/1.92 with e.g. Kernel Adiutor. Then please report back if this is stable.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mindkiller_18:
I think I found a problem. I just opened the on boot of Kernel Aduitor and can see many cpu changes that will be applied on boot. I now deleted all of them and will try now to flash again your battery mod and then see what happens :)

---------- Post added at 10:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 AM ----------

I think I found a problem. I just opened the on boot of Kernel Aduitor and can see many cpu changes that will be applied on boot. I now deleted all of them and will try now to flash again your battery mod and then see what happens :)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mindkiller_18:
tested and seems like it was a problem at my end. Deleting all the on boot options from Kernel Aduitor makes it to not go again to blue LED. So far so good! :)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ikram.senguen:
I bet u forgot to go back from undervolting after instability while holding settings on boot with kernel auditor. What are the benefits of horse and/or mix? Or what are the differences
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
I'm sad to say, that i didn't got Bat friendly kernel to run.

I installed latest AEX 5.3 - installed gapps - installed Magisk 16.3 - installed kernel.

System gets stuck in the booting animation.

Any Ideas why this can happen? Installed without kernel. all fine... =(
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Terminator.J:
Gonna go out on a limb and say ROM, then kernel, then gapps, then Magisk, and then try to boot. Magisk *patches* /boot so if you apply it first then *replace* /boot by flashing a custom kernel, that will probably mess it up.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
I can say, i tested this way too. =( With that method i got stuck in Fastbootmode. I can choose to boot to TWRP or "System" but then ialways come to fastboot mode. No boot to system possibe. :confused:

I also checked magisk thread and they say "If you plan to flash a custom kernel, flash it AFTER installing Magisk" -> stuck in fastboot mode weired stuff :rolleyes:
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mindkiller_18:
try first booting up with magisk and then again go to twrp and flash kernel. Hope this helps ?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
Will try later. I give feedback.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] P4ulRabbit:
this work thanks! :D
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mindkiller_18:
great :good:
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
Confirmed :)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
Hello void, thx for your bat friendly kernel. Runs fine so far. I tested "mix" tuning. Can u tell me what the main diff to horse, or qhorse? Only minor diffs as far as i can see. I cant recognize any input lag atm. Tested for 2 days now.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
horse is more aggressive in pushing tasks to the two big cores. mix on the other hand tries to cluster tasks on the little cores and should be a little more conservative in ramping up freqs.

as i've already written somewhere in this thread, i do think the big cores are more efficient on sd820 and thus should be involved more/sooner. that's what horse basically is trying to achieve.

edit: don't use qhorse right now. it's not supported on this kernel.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Frank11:
How do I go back to the standard kernel?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] jhobc:
[MENTION=4606613]void23[/MENTION]

Can you update the Cosmic OS kernel to latest version (04/06)?

Regards
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Hmm, if you're really sure this is the case, then I have only one idea... I've disabled CAMERA_DEBUG in the kernel, maybe this had some unwanted side-effects. I'm going to post an updated build with it back enabled in a few hours.

But on the other hand, I've just quickly tested it for myself and, to be honest, I cannot notice any difference in quality between my kernel and the stock AEX one. You were talking about latest AEX 0820, right?

EDIT: Oh, did I misunderstand you? You are saying that after flashing the ROM, but with keeping my kernel, it is ok again? What happens if you flash my kernel zip again now? Is it back to worse?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] MRDA1981:
The very same update, yes. I'm gonna try the kernel again and see if the correlation persists.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Wow, really high Antutu, especially the RAM score. I usually get around 11k...
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Bryandu13:
Very big score on 3dmark and Geekbench !

The 3Dmark score is almost at the same level than an iPad Pro 9.7 2016 (which is OP in gaming) and higher than any Snapdragon 820/821 device.

And the Geekbench score on single core is high as a S835 device ! Exactly the same score as OnePlus 5, but of course the multicore score is not insane.

Envoyé de mon Z2 Pro en utilisant Tapatalk
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] MRDA1981:
I meant, reflashing without your kernel fixed the camera.

Okay, I just gave the kernel another shot and the images are definitely noisier and less detailed, particularly with text.

Reflashing to standard AEX settings. Will wait for your debug-enabled version. Was there a particular reason you disabled it?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ralph.bethke1:
Hi, flashed the kernel on LOS13 and everything worked fine with the exception being the camera, which immediately FCs upon start.

Gesendet von meinem Z2 Pro mit Tapatalk
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
LOS13 is Android 6, right? I suppose there's a somewhat different camera API, so this kernel won't work properly. It's intented for Android 7 only, sorry.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ralph.bethke1:
Davidevinavils kernel used to work on LOS13 as well. The old stand-alone test kernel, to be precise, not the one bundled with AEX. Hence I gave this one a shot, I did not expect that it would work as good as it actually did on LOS13.

Gesendet von meinem Z2 Pro mit Tapatalk
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Ok, I see. Is there a specific reason you're sticking with LOS13? Why not update to 14.1? Just curious...
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] tsoureki:
Amazing!! Can you add kcal color control please? Thanks!!
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
I thought it was already enabled?! (same as in latest AEX).

But how can I check? Which app to use?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ralph.bethke1:
Hi, I am sticking to LOS13 due to superior battery life compared to any other custom ROM. I can easily get anywhere between 6-8h SOT while charging every 2-3 days. Other ROMs did not even get close to this.

Gesendet von meinem Z2 Pro mit Tapatalk
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Please find attached two different "test" versions. If 2a is ok, perfect, if not you can give 2b a try.

Many thanks for testing and I hope we can sort this out. Camera performance is important... :good:

EDIT: Removed attached test builds. These are not supposed to be used.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] MRDA1981:
Thanks! Much appreciated.

What's the difference between the two?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
You tell me! ;)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Ok,. I just checked kcal on a kernel level. kcal is present, working and even enabled by default. So I'm not sure there is some issue...
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] MRDA1981:
Sadly, neither of them gave a pic as good I get without the kernel. :( Never mind. I appreciate the efforts.

On the plus side, I wiped system partition and reflashed AEX, gapps, Magisk, et al, along w/ your thermal engine configuration. I get decent benchmarks from that.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Thanks for your effort in testing this, much appreciated. The funny thing is, kernel 2b is (nearly) exactly the same config as original AEX-0820-kernel, at least it should be. The only explanation I can come up with is that Davide's Github repo isn't showing the actual state he's using for building AEX...

So... I'm out of ideas otherwise. But still, I don't know if there's really an issue with camera quality, sorry. Do others also feel that camera quality degraded with my kernel?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Joiner22:
The kernel worked on the last RR! I had to restore the backup because no game in 3d wanted to open more and some applications got stuck as a telegram.

One question ... Can not activate the high performance and keep the temperature low? Why the battery goes away fast!
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] XDAMz:
Support the author! The The
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
not right now, i'm on holiday! ?

give me two weeks...
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] jhobc:
Sure bro! Have a nice holiday!

:D
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] mracar:
[MENTION=4606613]void23[/MENTION] [MENTION=4660349]jhobc[/MENTION]

Void5.1 supported in today cosmic, and rr.

Vendor image mounted ;)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] 北城旧巷:
Void5.1 supports rr0405？
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
Did someone test , if this kernel is AEX 5.4 compatible? Thx
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] bigmerlin2001:
[MENTION=4906015]AMDFenics[/MENTION]

I installed on last version of AEX 5.4 yesterday and no problems until now.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] xino22:
[MENTION=4606613]void23[/MENTION]

the multitasking Slim in AEX 5.3 fails occasionally, error UI closes you with the Kernel 5.1bat that I currently use and the previous one. if I use normal multitasking it does not fail but I like the Slim more.

edit : above all fails to do the double tap to return to the previous application.

with the serial kernel in AEX does not happen ..

Enviado desde mi Z2 Pro mediante Tapatalk
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
Hello Void, when u are back from holiday, could you try to make a batteryfriendly kernel for RR 6? This would be great! :)

Have a good day.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ikram.senguen:
Smooth as hell and battery good enough for me.

Latest antutu score
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Alvaro1982:
Not to me.

Last rr 13/04?

Void5ocx?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] ikram.senguen:
yes, yes, latest RR (treble) and void5ocx
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Alvaro1982:
I have last Rr 13/04, magisk factory faisauthar 16.3, clean install, opengapps pico.

But can't have more than 145000 with void5ocx.

You use any app to control kernel?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
You can try the version from the attachment. I'm currently using it on AEX 5.4, 175k Antutu. Haven't tested it yet on last RR though...

The issue is (at least on AEX 5.4), these full-treble ROMs have their thermal-engine.conf on vendor partition, not system. If you just flash my previous kernels on full-treble ROMs they'll work, but thermal throttling kicks in far too aggressively. This might explain low scores.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Alvaro1982:
Thanks man, you are the best.

Good job :)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] jhobc:
Outstanding performance! Thanks!

???
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] jhobc:
[MENTION=4606613]void23[/MENTION] can you please update the ocx version to work with the latest AEX update (from today - 04/17)

After I flash your kernel I'm stuck at fastboot mode.... :(
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
Encountered the same with RR.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Alvaro1982:
Try the version 6 posts behind. Works great for me
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Yeah, with the recent treble-related change from factory to vendor partition, older kernels won't be able to boot anymore.

For a preliminary release, see attachment. This is at least booting up and running fine on AEX5.4-0417, although it's again showing this vendor mismatch message. Still trying to figure out why and what to do against it...
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] jhobc:
thanks! working fine!

and now I don't have the cpu boost on little cores to 1.5 ghz everytime I touch the screen like the stock kernel from this new update....

about the message fix maybe [MENTION=7423011]mracar[/MENTION] can help you with that.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Alvaro1982:
Thanks. Works good with the new Rr 17/04
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Z2 PLUS

Per request, here's a 5.4ocx version for Z2 Plus.

BEWARE: FOR Z2 PLUS ONLY AND TOTALLY UNTESTED! (I don't have this device)

If it works, fine, if not, sorry, there's nothing I can do. It's too tedious if I cannot test it myself, I hope you understand.

Z2 Pro, stay tuned... :)

EDIT: Removed Z2 Plus attachment, apparently not working, don't know why and cannot test, sorry.

EDIT2: Ok, one last effort, check attachment. It's a new version.

EDIT3: Yay, this is working fine!
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
void5.4

Ok, i've just uploaded void5.4 for AEX/RR full treble with vendor partition, see 1st post as usual.

Mismatch warning is gone, thanks [MENTION=7423011]mracar[/MENTION].

I hope RR is working correctly, haven't yet tested, but some have and apparently it's working fine.

Performance is still not quite on the same level as AEX 5.3 before full treble, but it's ok I'd say. (Antutu loss ~8k for me)

But from short testing on my part battery life seems to have improved, which certainly is a good thing! You know, I still think we've always had more than enough performance on Z2 Pro, battery life was/is the issue...
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] Ninnix96:
Thanks, it's all right, I hope in a future bat version update!

Ps: I have see now, 5.4 bat is already online thanks
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
Do we still need the script "/system/etc/void_tuning.sh horse"???
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] XDAMz:
Thank you
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Well, I wouldn't say 'need', but I do suggest it. The default scheduler and governor settings are far from optimal in my opinion.

That said, I'm not sure how big the difference in real life actually is (performance vs. battery vs. UI experience), so well, maybe it's not that important after all.

And I'm still trying to figure out a way to include it directly in the flashable zip. But for these 5.4 versions, the simple answer is 'Yes'. ;)
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] AMDFenics:
THX mate

btw, how is the voltage calculated? auto or manual by u?
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] void23:
Voltage is currently unchanged from the kernel base I use. For 5.4 this is cosmedd's kernel source tree and I don't touch the voltages.
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] jhobc:
Working perfectly on Z2 Plus of my girlfriend with latest AEX 5.4.

Thanks!
[Lenovo Zuk Z2 Pro ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Oth] bartys:
is it working on Phh-Treble aosp on zuk z2 plus?