yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
A method to get flash part number without root (only for UFS flash):

a) Install Terminal Emulator for Android from Google Play Store

b) Text 'cat /proc/scsi/scsi' to get flash part number (there is a space after 'cat').

-------------------------------

At April 30th, 2017: More than 200 people in Mainland China have tested their Mate 9 or Mate 9 Pro. And the results are amazing! Most of the phones are with UFS2.0 Flash memories from Samsung and Toshiba, a few UFS2.1 flash memories are from SK-Hynix. The percentage of UFS2.1 ( Huawei announced that all their Mate 9/Mate 9 Pro are using UFS2.1) flash is less than 15%!

Similar results (more than 20 people) came from Taiwan that all their flash memories are UFS2.0 from Samsung and Toshiba.

All the part numbers appeared are as follows:

Samsung UFS2.0:

KLUBG4G1CE-B0B1 MLC UFS2.0 32GB about 460MB/s (seems only in Mainland China)

KLUCG4J1CB-B0B1 MLC UFS2.0 64GB about 460MB/s (seems only in Mainland China)

KLUDG8J1CB-B0B1 MLC UFS2.0 128GB about 460MB/s (seems only in Mainland China)

KLUCG4J1EB-B0B1 MLC UFS2.0 64GB about 850MB/s

KLUDG8J1EB-B0B1 MLC UFS2.0 128GB about 850MB/s

KLUEG8U1EM-B0B1 TLC UFS2.0 256GB about 850MB/s

Toshiba US2.0:

THGBF7G8K4LBATR MLC UFS2.0 32GB about 610MB/s

THGBF7G9L4LBATR MLC UFS2.0 64GB about 610MB/s

THGBF7T0L8LBATA MLC UFS2.0 128GB about 610MB/s

SK-Hynix UFS2.1:

H28U62301AMR MLC UFS2.1 32GB about 550MB/s (seems only in Mainland China)

H28U74301AMR MLC UFS2.1 64GB about 550MB/s (seems only in Mainland China)

H28U88301AMR MLC UFS2.1 128GB about 550MB/s (seems only in Mainland China)

Have you ever tested your phone? What is the result then?

More information about UFS2.0 and UFS2.1: https://xdaforums.com/mate-9/help/guide-difference-ufs2-0-ufs2-1-flash-t3598967

Update:

The newest product is regularly faster. But you should notice that it is a comparison between the products by the same design and manufacturing company. Sumsung, Toshiba and SK-Hynix are using different flash cell structures, different controllers and different Technologies.

For Samsung, they annouced that their UFS2.1 is with a maximum speed of 880MB/s, UFS2.0 with 850MB/s (HS-G3 2-Lane) and 460MB/s (HS-G3 1-Lane).

For Toshiba, they annouced that their UFS2.1 is with a maximum speed of 850MB/s, UFS2.0 with 610MB/s.

For SK-Hynix, they annouced that their UFS2.1 is with a maximum speed of 800MB/s, UFS2.0 with 780MB/s. But there is kind of over advertisement (no one with SK-Hynix UFS2.1 ever reached 600MB/s).
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Please tell us what is your part number. And this is useful for fighting for our rights!!!
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] vargala81:
Mate 9 model L09 - 64 GB

Toshiba - THGBF7G9L4LBATR MLC UFS2.0 64GB about 610MB/s
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Swan Princess:
Thank you for sharing this code with us. What would the code be to look up camera, screen and DDR part names I wonder?
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] cnutt1:
Hi I'm on mate 9 in UK I got THGBF7G9L4LBATRC UFS 2.0 blantent lies by huawei I'll be ringing my carrier in the morning see what's going to be done cheers for the method
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
It is better to use APP 'AIDA64' for looking at the other informations. Please notice that not all the info are provided.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] zayidhs:
I'm sorry but I don't buy your point from the first post where you said there is no speed improvement but went on to state in point C - iv Command priority: improves system performance, allowing the software to assign higher priority to more urgent tasks.

So the auxiliary functions are the differences between UFS2.0 and UFS2.1.

So my question stands if that is the case of no improvements at the beginning but later said there is improvement in system performance, what does it mean? How can you improve system performance? Writing faster, reduce more heat, reduce power consumption add pleasing font?

Cos I want to know which performance is improved. But in your other post, you replied that operating speed of urgent tasks), if that's the case, doesn't it translate to a faster system than UFS2.0 which doesn't have this feature?

Now to anyone that knows about the ubiquitous nature of memory, the benchmark has always been speed cos the capacity or durability is easier to negotiate. With this in mind, we know that the entire tech world uses speed as a selling point for upgrade from MicroSD to eMMC 4.5,5.0 & 5.1 to UFS2.0 and now UFS2.1.

First question is, Are you trying to tell us that the entire tech world has been wrong or deceiving us??? Cos everywhere states that among improvements from UFS2.0 to UFS2.1 is speed by over 30%

Second question is that In an ever-growing and improving technology and life where speed is the benchmark for anything we do in computing, that UFS2.1 was designed to improve over UFS2.0 by also increasing speeds - which is a well known fact. Are you sure that speed is not a discrimination between UFS2.0 and UFS2.1???

Lastly, you said UFS2.1 flash memories are regularly faster only because they are newest product and with better integrated controllers and flash cell technologies.

So if I understand the above statement, UFS2.1 are faster naturally due to controllers and whatnot but you contradict yourself cos all the UFS2.1 you have up here are have reduced write speeds from 850MBps in UFS2.0 to 550MBps??? Over 35% performance loss at a time when octa-core SoCs and 6GB RAM are deemed insufficient??? Is that improvement or regression???

On a final note, please note that the information might be right, just that there are a few loopholes + don't know the veracity of the information - not sure where you got it from TBH.

But please do not feel my questions as an attack, far from that. I'm actually a very inquisitive person, I always want to know how things work and see myself as a semi-technophile.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Thank you for your reply.

"First question is, Are you trying to tell us that the entire tech world has been wrong or deceiving us??? Cos everywhere states that among improvements from UFS2.0 to UFS2.1 is speed by over 30% "

What I was trying to say is that the higher speed is not what the UFS2.0/2.1 Standard regulated. Theoretically, an HS-G2 1-lane product can also meet the requirement of UFS2.1 Standard, although it is with a maximum speed about 350MB/s. But for the real flash memory product, the newer is always better in order to attract the customers. That is not because of the standard.

"Second question is that In an ever-growing and improving technology and life where speed is the benchmark of anything we do in computing, that UFS2.1 was designed to improve over UFS2.0 by also increasing speeds - which is a well known fact. Are you sure that speed is not a discrimination between UFS2.0 and UFS2.1???"

The well known fact as you said that "UFS2.1 is faster than UFS2.0" is not correct. UFS2.1 Standard is a small improvement from UFS2.0 (minor version change), i.e. some accessory functions. They are small but not means they are not important. The huge speed improvement will happen when the major version changes, i.e. UFS3.0 will support HS-G4 and will be at least two times faster than HS-G3 (used in UFS2.x).

Some statements are true here:

a) UFS2.1 standard is not faster than UFS2.0 standard.

b) For the mobile flash memory products from the same company, the UFS2.1 flash memory product is usually better/faster than the UFS2.0 flash memory product.

"Lastly, you said UFS2.1 flash memories are regularly faster only because they are newest product and with better integrated controllers and flash cell technologies.

So if I understand the above statement, UFS2.1 are faster naturally due to controllers and whatnot but you contradict yourself cos all the UFS2.1 you have up here are have reduced write speeds from 850MBps to 550MBps??? Over 35% performance loss at a time when octa-core SoCs and 6GB RAM are deemed insufficient??? Is that improvement or regression???"

The newest product is regularly faster. Yes, it is ture. But you should notice that it is a comparison between the products by the same design and manufacturing company. Sumsung, Toshiba and SK-Hynix are using different flash cell structures, different controllers and different Technologies.

For Samsung, they annouced that their UFS2.1 is with a maximum speed of 880MB/s, UFS2.0 with 850MB/s (HS-G3 2-Lane) and 460MB/s (HS-G3 1-Lane).

For Toshiba, they annouced that their UFS2.1 is with a maximum speed of 850MB/s, UFS2.0 with 610MB/s.

For SK-Hynix, they annouced that their UFS2.1 is with a maximum speed of 800MB/s, UFS2.0 with 780MB/s. But there is kind of over advertisement (no one with SK-Hynix UFS2.1 ever reached 600MB/s).

Does it make any sense?
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
I'm fine. We are discussing about technical things together.

I can confirm that all the information and numbers are from the official websites or advertisements. You can do some Google yourself. Sorry I cannot paste any out-of-XDA links right now becuase I was new here.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Good luck! Please let us know your update at your convenience.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] cnutt1:
Course will do I've also tweeted huawei mobile UK telling them of the findings,telling them their being fraudulent there's a couple of people already getting involved in that lol
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
For the three screenshots you provided:

a) The upper figure is wrong. Someone who misunderstood the standards changed the upper right corner 'UFS2.0' to 'UFS2.1'. No matter the flash is UFS2.0 or UFS2.1, they must support HS-G2 (1-Lane up to 2.9Gbps and 2-lane up to 5.8Gbps). HS-G3 is optional (1-Lane up to 5.8Gbps and 2-lane up to 11.6Gbps).

b) The red line you highlighted is "JESD220-1A", but this is the Standard of UFS1.1, kind of end-of-life.

c) This figure shows the UFS2.0 product at the year of 2014. As I said before, the UFS2.0 product with HS-G2 1-Lane was with maximum interface speed of 2.9Gbps (i.e. about 350MB/s). This was not an attractive speed compared with eMMC products. All HS-G2 1-Lane UFS2.0 product was End-of-Life. We are using HS-G2 2-Lane (up to 5.8Gbps), HS-G3 1-Lane (up to 5.8Gbps) and HS-G3 2-Lane (upto 11.6Gbps) now.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Good news! Thank you!
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Sasa_Jevric:
I have same one on my Mate 9

Samsung s8 got same UFS flash

https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Samsung+Galaxy+S8+Teardown/87136
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Akhayev:
View attachment 4133590

How do i know what is mine ?
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Please check any part number after the word "Model:", and find it from the original post. Yours: THGBF7T0L8LBATA MLC UFS2.0 128GB about 610MB/s
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Yes, according to incomplete statistics by now, Samsung S8 is using Toshia UFS2.0 memory. And Samsung S8+ is using Toshiba UFS2.1 memory...
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Jaimesco12:
This is some bs I know it's not a big deal but they advertised 2.1. Got Toshiba 2.0 Gonna try and switch to the s8+ or the new iPhone 8 when it comes out. Never buying from shady ass Huawei again.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] btblue:
Just tested mine.

Im on an AL00 (128 GB, 6GB RAM) from mainland China, imported to UK and converted to AL29 (B172).

According to terminal I have the following:

Samsung KLUDG8J1EB-B0B1 Rev 0501 Scsi Rev 06
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] btblue:
Here with terminal specs
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
128GB UFS2.0 by Samsung

Is it Mate9 or pro?
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] btblue:
It's a Mate 9. Not pro.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Got it. Thank you!
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Leighm0:
I also have the SAMSUNG KLUDG8J1EB-B0B1 according to terminal.. Mate 9 Pro Asia LON-L29C636.

That means I have UFS 2.0 too? But my Benchmarks are getting over 700MB/s and the device is snappy and fast, so cant complain really.. UFS 2.1 wasn't actually any selling point for me but stupid they bull**** on this.. and still are!

Their website still states the Pro has UFS 2.1.. clearly not!

http://consumer.huawei.com/en/mobile-phones/mate9pro/html/performance.htm
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] zayidhs:
So, from all the information, it seems that the UFS2.0 is faster than the UFS2.1 available to Mate 9 by about 32% (UFS2.0 = 850MBps while UFS2.1 =550MBps )

Since I bought my phone with speed in mind, why should I be bothered?

The only improved thing JEDEC says is security between SoC and memory etc. But without that security, I'm as safe as I am right now.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Yep. You are in charge of your own phone. I am just providing information.

But actually there is no any UFS2.1 flash memory ever found outside Mainland China. Why you didn't think that if your phone was using UFS2.1 from Samsung or Toshiba, it would be faster?

By the way, have you tested your phone？
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] zayidhs:
I'm not going to bother testing my phone cos I get 800+ on Androbench.

I've said it in other posts on this issue. I agree that the customer has every right to feel aggrieved but for me, I'm cool.

Used iPhone, Samsung and LG. The other two were OK but LG G3 had screen flickering problem, V10 bootlooped in 6 months of purchase just to find out I'm out of warranty.

Every company including Apple and Samsung have cutbacks they employ so none has the moral right to point fingers.

I love this device with its wonderful camera, solid battery, strong processor, fast charging, best heat management I've had so far - always cool and most importantly, goes toe to toe with the best phones out there (O+3T, iPhone 7, S8) when it comes to speed - no phone beats it hands down in all categories. All for over $300 cost differential vs major flagships.

Regardless of everything said and done, I'm one very happy customer???
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] qrtnielsen:
Hi,

I have a Mate 9 MHA-L29C636B172 and

Terminal Emulator return this: THGBF7G9L4LBATRC (which is not on your list?)

A1 SD Bench: Read: 349,49; Write: 130,29

So I wonder what I have??

Kurt
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
All the part numbers have been listed in the post. For Toshiba flash, just forget about the last letter 'C'. Yours is Toshiba UFS2.0.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] qrtnielsen:
Thanks a lot.

After been using Samsung Note (3 models), I have now been a keen user of Mate 7, Mate 8 and now Mate 9 and the last is definitely razing fast compared with the all the previous phones.

What really puzzles me is, why the seller is lying about a product that is overall very fasat and why it is so complicated to get updates to square irritating errors away. I am basically just a simple user trying to understand what is going on by reading all the messages, on this forum, from all the very clever and eager guys. And doing that makes me very humble to experience such a wealth of knowledge! :)

Kurt
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] cnutt1:
Huawei are so far completely ignoring my efforts to contact them on Twitter phone call to their UK customer services next
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Blueyed1:
I got LON 29 Huawei Mate 9 Pro 128MB

Speed 728m/s

Samsung KLUDG8J1EB-B0B1

Location Denmark
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Dekdek1:
Mate 9 pro. LON L29

Malaysia
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Broxxx:
Mate 9 Germany .

Gesendet von Huawei Mate 9
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] itsjustmeagain:
MHA-L29

Mate 9 / 64 GB / Germany
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] WieserZ1C:
Mate 9 64GB Germany delivered by O2
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Kjevo:
2.0 in Europa

I'm gonna try and get my carrier to take it back on warranty. It's not build upto specifications so it's false advertising. Will see.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Dekdek1:
I wanna return tis n get s8+
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] tboy2000:
With AndroBench, what is your Sequential write speed?
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] tboy2000:
L29C636B172 Mate 9 64gb

So I apparently have Samsung UFS 2.0.

However my Sequential Write speed is abnormally low. Repeated test many times. What does this mean?
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Dekdek1:
U think huawei will refund or recall?
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Might be. At least you can contact the local customer service or supplier for a refund.

Huawei is acting harsh in this incident in Mainland China and Thailand.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Possible reasons:

a) The free space of your phone is low.

b) The flash memory IC in your phone is imperfect.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] cnutt1:
Huawei has now contacted me asking how I determined I have ufs 2.0 flash,I have told them and will let you know anything further
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] MechanteMiette:
UFS 2.0 by Samsung. Might be the fastest one (for 2.0) but the results are... quite disappointing.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] tboy2000:
Free space is 16gb so I hope it's not b).
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Mostar088:
To bee honest i dont think Huawei will refund anyone. If u read the fineprint they have the law on there side.

Terms Of Use

Disclaimer

This Website and its contents are provided for your convenience only. Although Huawei has attempted to provide accurate information on this Website, it assumes no obligation or responsibility regarding the accuracy of the information whatsoever. Huawei may change the contents available on this Website or the products mentioned at any time without notice.

ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEBSITE IS PROVIDED ON "AS IS" BASIS WITHOUT WARRANTIES, GUARANTEES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND. HUAWEI HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, ALL EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHER WARRANTIES, GUARANTEES OR REPRESENTATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] XoanCarlos:
Official response from Huawei Spain: Mate 9 supports UFS and its official website does not put that brings UFS 2.1, puts that supports.

They lie.

Enviado desde mi MHA-L09 mediante Tapatalk
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] cnutt1:
Shocking stuff I'm trying to sort it with huawei UK will let you know what they say
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
They should not do things like this. Disgusting.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Kjevo:
Netherlands

I called Huawei Netherlands and they said they are working on a press release and cannot say anything till then
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
On their official website, they say "Gracias a su nueva memoria flash UFS 2.1 conseguirás velocidades de transferencia de datos que son un 100% más rápidas que en la eMMC 5.1.", which means "Becuase of the new UFS 2.1 flash memory, the phones are with data transfer speeds that are 100% faster than eMMC 5.1."

How could Huawei change their statement so easily? Disappointed.

Same wording came from Japan that Huawei said they "support UFS2.1". Customers in Japan feel uncomfortable about it.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] XoanCarlos:
More info...http://droidsans.com/thailand-mate-9-and-p10-conclusion-from-3-parties/View attachment 4137948

Enviado desde mi MHA-L09 mediante Tapatalk
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Swan Princess:
What does it say?
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] XoanCarlos:
More info...

https://youtu.be/v18UVcWAOUQ

Enviado desde mi MHA-L09 mediante Tapatalk
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
You can find some information here, then Google Translate them:

https://droidsans.com/huawei-flash-memory-test-with-thailand-cosumer-rights/

https://droidsans.com/thailand-mate-9-and-p10-conclusion-from-3-parties/

I used Google Translate, and reviewed the English version. I'm not sure if the translation is all correct, but it seems to be:

a) At 1st-May-2017, there was a meeting among some consumer representatives, Huawei Consumer Business Group Thailand, Office of the Consumer Protection Board of Thailand (OCPB) and some experts from universities.

b) Huawei explained that:

i) UFS2.1 and UFS2.0 is not about hardware, but an interface standard.

ii) There is no speed difference between UFS2.1 and UFS2.0, but only some other functions.

iii) Huawei had temporarily removed the description of UFS2.1 on their official website just because there is some complains and they want to avoid potential confusion with consumers. Huawei has already brought the UFS2.1 information back onto the site.

iv) As its Mate 9 Series mobile phones are as comparable as UFS2.1, they confirmed that all Huawei Mate 9 Series mobile phones is UFS2.1 compatible and meet the standard.

c) OCPB claimed that all parties in the meeting had no problems with the conclusions about UFS2.1.

d) There will be another two weeks for Huawei to take action for any additional advertising, and to determine if there will be a compensation method for its customers.

e) The consumer representatives who participated in the test were actually not satisfied with the results. The consumer representatives thought OCPB cannot protect people in Thailand. And they thought Huawei was short-sighted and breaking the brand.

_________________

My thought:

JESD220C [Universal Flash Storage (UFS), Version 2.1] is the standard of UFS2.1 compatible flash memory IC itself.

JESD223C [Universal Flash Storage Host Controller Interface (UFSHCI), Version 2.1] is the standard of UFS2.1 host.

Huawei advertised on its website that the phone is using “new UFS2.1 flash memory”, which means the memory IC itself should meet UFS2.1 standard (i.e. JESD220C).

Additionally, UFS host in the phone (related controller interface inside SoC) should meet UFS2.1 standard (i.e JESD223C) to truly realise the additional functions of UFS2.1 as well.

So, back to the essence, how could Mate 9 Series phone be using "new UFS2.1 flash memory" without a UFS2.1 flash memory? Huawei is teasing its consumers by playing with words.

[IMG="Descritption of UFS2.1 on Huawei website"]https://img.tuttoandroid.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/huawei_mate_9_memorie_ufs.png[/IMG]

[IMG="A spoof figure by Thailand consumer"]https://images.droidsans.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Huawei_memcardtest.jpg[/IMG]

http://consumer.huawei.com/en/mobile-phones/mate9/html/performance.htm

https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/results/jesd220c

https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/results/jesd223c
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] XoanCarlos:
The TV news...in the confrontation at the Consumer Protection Office between Huawei, authorities and people affected.

https://youtu.be/scYHl9PlIA0

Enviado desde mi MHA-L09 mediante Tapatalk
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] BLEK0TA:
Mine MHA-L09 from slovakia

And my benchmark
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Willyman:
Mine: THGBF7T0L8LBATA MLC UFS2.0 128GB about 610MB/s
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] phonatic_13:
Mate 9 US variant

UFS reading and Benchmark test.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Thank you so much for this info. But I do not know anything about the language. A sad story.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Jamestdd:
Samsung S8 is facing the same problem now. Apparently those running sd 835 only have ufs2.0
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] Broxxx:
Samsung S8 with UFS-2.0 ???

https://de.ifixit.com/Teardown/Samsung+Galaxy+S8+Teardown/87136

Gesendet von Huawei Mate 9
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] xlgssss:
Have you noticed the top article of XDA today?

https://www.xda-developers.com/the-...ng-between-ufs-2-1-and-ufs-2-0/#disqus_thread

Huawei made a bad start for it.
[Huawei Mate 9 Questions & Answers] XoanCarlos:
Huawei announces that the Mate 9 have flash memory UFS 2.1, the reality is quite different and most of the Mate 9 analyzed have UFS 2.0 of the brands Samsung and Toshiba. Misleading advertising? Fraud? Pass it on!

https://youtu.be/qG5i-SuQ2Fo

Enviado desde mi MHA-L09 mediante Tapatalk