yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] adry1988:
Love the ROM. Definitely smooth and responsive. Only problems I'm experiencing is with calls. Had thus problem with initial cm/lineage where sensor doesn't respond quick enough and have a black screen. Today I had a phone call but couldn't answer because I couldn't see the screen properly. I don't know if that was related to sensor or auto brightness but it preventing me from having this as my daily driver.

Any fix?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _mone:
Thanks for the kind workds.

If by location you mean the tile for gps, just pull all the way down the notification panel, click the small pencil icon (on top close to the settings icon) and you'll be able to add/remove/relocate all the tiles, including the gps one (see screenshot).
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
Here is the thing, I dont have this little pencil, so I cannt get in edit menu and add gps tile in my menu. I know how this menu works as i have it in my Note 2 as well, but for some reason its not showing in mine statys bar. Could that Be because of Gapps i used? (BeanGapps mini)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _mone:
I have used the same GApps package and I have that icon.. Weird, maybe the theme?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
Its really strange, I have this from the first version of the rom, update was dirty flashed.

I never use themes.

Any way , its not that important. I can live without it until next built.

I will then make a clean flash and see if its solved that way.

Thank you for your replay.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Oldnobby:
Hi everyone

Can someone tell me what is this error on the picture please? Thank you
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
DO YOU HAVE ANY BACKUP TO RESTORE IT THROUGH TWRP?

DO IT boot in rom and check IMEI OF YOUR PHONE
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] jasodo:
Hi again! I'm getting some problems with this rom. Battery is juts 1:20 of screen (some times less that this) and it goes really hoy when playing (Clash Royale for example)

Which could be the problem?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Oldnobby:
Hi [MENTION=5554397]logosA[/MENTION]

Yes I did that after i got stuck on boot loop and it fine with the my other previous ROM, but what is strange is that this happened when I flash the SuperSU and the previous error command log was gone and after and this other error show up? I was wondering why that happened???

Thanks
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _mone:
New Build:

aicp_trltexx_n-12.1-UNOFFICIAL-20170426.zip

[MENTION=3881166]Morganator[/MENTION] now you can find the option to control vibrator intensity in Settings > Sound > Other sounds > Vibrator intensity
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _mone:
[MENTION=7404588]Oldnobby[/MENTION] please don't spam this thread with errors that occurs while flashing other ROMs. Thanks.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
flashed clean. Booting up.....

boot comleted, finishing installation

edit: setup is stuck 15 minutes,reboot again

reflashing

yes, that was the way. finished succesfully
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
Factory reset, advance wipe, data, system, cashe dalvik. Received this message. Took these logs.

Repeat from begging, no message ROM booted, stuck in setup. Rebooted repeated all from the begging> success.

Now I have even little pencil in edit quick tile s

:)

its more likely my phone's hardware error than rom
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Oldnobby:
My apologizes to you [MENTION=6847876]_mone[/MENTION] I didn't meant to do that it was a mistake of my part posting the wrong picture sorry!!!
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
Battery looks even better in todays built. Vibration can now be set to what ever value you want.

Rom feels faster to me and to antutu

Only one question, substratum engine was not include in the Rom.

Is that so, or its just me like the quick tiles setting that I didnt had when others did.

(not that I miss it, in the contrary. All I ever wanted is a black backgroung in system menu and setting)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Morganator:
Thanks OP! You're an amazing dev. This rom is by far the snapiest and feature intense Nougat rom I've used.

I was wondering does anybody have the issue where Snapchat force closes? I've tried uninstalling Magisk and the problem is solved. If I restore it, even with Magisk Hide turned on and Snapchat selected, then it crashes and I cant open it.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _mone:
The "engine" is included, you have just to install the app and theme.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _mone:
Sorry, I don't use snapchat.. maybe some other users can help you with that.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Morganator:
Thanks, that's ok.

SafertyNet check in the Magisk Manager keeps spinning. This apparently can be caused by Google play services, so I've force closed/reinstalled different GApps. No dice.

In the mean time I've uninstalled Magisk and used SuperSU which is a work around, hopefully that helps someone.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
nice rom indeed. i was on lineageOS previously, but moved away as the daily builds were bringing more and more issues for me. I went to Alexndrs debloated touchwiz with xposed, and for stability and the fact that everything (camera included) works very well - no surprise as its a tw rom. This is a great rom though, seems much more stable than LineageOS at the mo, not as customisable i dont think as RR or Emotion, but its a great balance - good work all :)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _nEoN_:
Nice and smooth rom but my device gets extremely hot with normal use and the battery drain very fast.

Anyone experienced this issues?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Note4Addict:
Currently have Dr. Ketan Note7 Rom on my N910F Note4 and though it's very stable with camera and Fingerprint working as it is TW derived, I am avidly following this thread as it is very positive and running Android 7.1.2 with functional Spen while the camera app could be replaced with Proshot I suppose to overcome the inherent camera problems.

What has me thoroughly confused though as a beginner in custom Roms is the difference between between RR, Emotion and this AICP 7.1.2 Roms for the Note4. At first sight they seem very similar. Apart from the Spen in this ROM they're all good, stable and very customizable and even have some of the same developers on board.

Could one of you please explain me the key differences between these Roms which keep the Note4 very much alive and kicking?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _nEoN_:
So... Anyone had this issue so far? If it help I'm using open gapps stock
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] ForceField:
Nope, Everything is Fine here.

At the end of the day I am still at 70%

Using OppenGaps

It's even the most stable ROM here, everything is working
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] _nEoN_:
What is the version that you use of oppengaps
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Rum_inant:
someone installed kernel adiutor? any possibility to use double2wake?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Raven_999:
This Rom has Samsung kernel built in if I'm not mistaken, which doesn't support DoubleTap2Wake
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] ForceField:
I flashed it with : open_gapps-arm-7.1-pico-20170419

It's the all new google playstore and new play services

Usually I download a version of openGapps every 2 weeks because I think it's useless to download them daily just to have a version with the latest date and barely or with no update at all

Anyway , they will automatically upgrade themselves from Playstore :)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] peppet:
Sot?

Inviato dal mio SM-N9200 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] mrllvllinh:
will you support n9100?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
First app crash, took a few days but Facebook crashed out. Seems to plague all 7 roms
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] peppet:
Great rom. I installed screenoffmemo, it works but don't save notes. Is there another way to take notes when screen is off?

Inviato dal mio SM-N910F utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
I couldn't tell you the indepth details, but I've tried a fair few of the current ROMs. Different developers may decide to add different features, for example I'd say LineageOS is the most vanilla, by design I believe. So built for speed and stability. I wouldn't say it's quite there yet for daily driver ability, I was getting frequent crashes in some apps and the performance while very good - not the best. EmotionOS and Resurrection are very good also, a lot of added tweaks and features to play with. The performance I'd say in each is better than LineageOS, some app crashes, but not as many as LineageOS. AICP is the latest I've tried, and I'd say it's between Lineage and Resurrection, it's more customisable but not as much as Resurrection. Much more stable than LineageOS, performance is better but not quite as snappy as Resurrection I don't think. In all of them the camera is not good, but that's well known and expected. Replacement cameras do work, but none I don't think perform as well as stock camera on touchwiz. Alexndrs touchwiz debloated ROM with xposed is probably the best bet if you want everything to work, great performance and the ability for lots of customisation with xposed. The UI is dated compared to the newer ROMs, but not much. All in all, each of the Devs of all these ROMs do fantastically well, and when they are finished with these ROMs I'm sure they will be awesome, for now I think work in progress is a fair description, still great but not finished
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Note4Addict:
Thanks Luminar2010 for giving me the insight of your experience with these ROMs.

Indeed all my respect to the Devs for putting their expertise and their time on the line so we can enjoy their work. That's why it's so difficult to choose one of them to go forward to a 7.1.2 based ROM. I'll give these, and their threads, my full attention and when they are close to being "finished" I'll jump on the bandwagon of one of these to choose my next daily driver!

Thanks again!
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] AFriend26:
does anyone have this running on 910v? If so could you share your data fix and kernel would love to try this rom out.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] mfd10000:
Is root builtin?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
Guys has any one of you installed this rom over a F2FS CASHE and DATA partition? If so have you notice any difference?

[MENTION=976339]mfd10000[/MENTION] , yes Rom is using magisk as a root method. Goo to apps drawer>magisk manager>root and you can check it there
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
Yes I have with this and other ROMs. You notice it initially, but as you use it more I'd say I'd balances out. It's not a night and day difference I dont think
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
The last week have become available TWRP 3.1 for the Note 2 , in which I am mostly active the last year.

So, I had the chance to format my phone (cashe and data only because I also tried system once and almost bricked my phone) and I am using F2FS in it.

As you already said, cannt tell the difference and no one can understand that is running ext4 or f2fs. Lets see in more time if it does.

Thank you for the time and your reply .

:good::):good:
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Kind44:
Going to install AICP for the first time as soon as my N4 is charged, coming from EmotionOS and having tried RR 5.8.3. Liked both equally, but reading through here sparked my interest, just have a question and searched the Thread without finding an answer. As AICP seems to come with stock kernel and has magisk implemented, would it be safe to use the Emotion Kernel with Magisk from the Resurrection Remix Thread? Cause I really like customization options for voltage and sheduler and don't want to install on good luck and screw myself over.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
If you like Resurrection then to be honest there's no real gain coming to AICP. Not that it's not a good ROM, but I wouldn't say it offers more than Resurrection. It's just different, I dont know if a different kernel alone would give you those options back, no idea but sounds doubtful
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Kind44:
Thanks for the answer. Not about gaining something from switching to AICP, I just really like trying out different ROMs. Going to stay on stock kernel to try AICP, maybe I'll test it with the Emotion kernel at a later time.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
This is my personal opinion and only:

Install rom, give it a day with its default settings and if you are not pleased or satisfied with what you will see, try out other kernels and customizations.

Its really worth it, but you are the one who will decide about that.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Kind44:
That would be exactly what I had in mind, as I try to use new ROMs as daily for 1-2 weeks to get experience over time and not just two days. This way it is giving me the ability to compare more detailed between battery and overall usability.

Just wanted to ask if anyone experimented with a different kernel on this ROM and if, how it effected performance and battery. Might do it myself in a week or so if noone did, but as mentioned in my first post, I would love to have an answer on if I could use the flashable zips from RRs thread, either for Magisk or if I should uninstall Magisk and use the raw kernel, preferably from _mone, but I'll go ahead and try at my own risk if I don't get an answer.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
Performance and battery are very good on this ROM, I wouldn't worry about that. I've had a single Facebook crash a few days ago, that's it, absolutely no issues other than that

---------- Post added at 07:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:53 PM ----------

I always remove magisk if I can, I prefer superSU, I've never needed anything more than superSU, just a personal preference, no real reason other than that
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Kind44:
Never really gave Magisk a chance, removed it on RR from the start and replaced it with superSU, wanted to stick with Magisk on AICP to see if I like it and if it improves something for me. But maybe removing Magisk if I intend to try another kernel would remove one possible interference.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
I've heard others talk about battery drain with magisk, can't say I noticed that really but it's just a habit I've got into, maybe if there's a reason to keep it in the future I will, but superSU seems to have always been with me over the years, just pure habit
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] smartidoos:
thx for this great rom ,but is it ever going to get officeel??

just like the roms for the note 2..
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
Since the moment AICP has decided to use magisk as the root method in their roms, a lot of arguments have been rise mostly about how magisk is causing battery drain and many of us uninstalled magisk and used SuperSU again to supposedly fix that. I was one of these users and have post about that as well.

The last 3 days I have made a test in my Samsung Note 2 running on the latest AICP rom(s). I was motivated to do so because in my Note 4 running also AICP 12.1 (this rom by _mone) , which also uses magisk , battery was 50% less!

So I clean flashed the latest nightly with magisk as root and monitored rom for 24 hours with betterbattery stats(XDA edition).

After that i again clean flashed rom and this time removed magisk (with its un-installer and also uninstalled magisk manager) and flashed SuperSU 2.79 SR3

Used the same Gapps (BeanGapps mini) and exactly the same user apps (exactly the same setup as in my Note 4)

Monitored rom again for the same time and I found out this:

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE between SuperSU and Magisk when it comes to battery consumption.

This must be a bug in LOS code and the power managment which is not letting the rom to sleep ever.

Installing a power management app (Greenify, Naptime), dropped battery consumption more than 50 %. This was the reason that my note 4 is having less battery, beause I had Greenify installed in it.

I have made a detailed post in AICP 12.1 thread in XDA for Samsung Note 2, in which everyone who would like, can see the stats by himself and make his conclusions of that.

So dont be afraid of magisk about battery drain
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
The problem is if there was a bug, it would affect all users, and I can't say I had those issues
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] logosA:
If you are talking about magisk the only issue i have found is sometimes (usually when its manager gets updates) , something happens with the root permissions and you have to do some actions to set it back again (clear cashe, force close and reopen, reboot etc), things that SuperSU never had.

Using magisk manager also to add some mods can be problematic some times.

If you are talking about power managment of the rom, then yes its , in my opinion, the best balanced rom this moment between performance /functionality and battery usage.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Luminar2010:
Agreed, I had issues too where magisk seemed to need a minute or 2 after boot to give root permissions back to apps. I'm not so familiar with it really, superSU just seems simpler to manage for me
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Kind44:
So far really liking AICP and I think Magisk is something I can easily get used to, especially since so far there is no battery drain appearing.

Just one little thing I wanted to ask. Despite working Fingerprint I usually just stick to the good old PIN unlock, on Emotion and RR there is an option to do a quick unlock when the PIN is entered correctly, am I just blind or is it not implemented in AICP?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] smartidoos:
camera not working,
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Kind44:
Stock Camera isn't working properly on all custom Nougat ROMs, use a different one like Snap or Open Camera and it should make much less trouble.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Cyaanide:
I am using this ROM and it works smooth. Super fast. But the only problem I am facing that I cannot sync contacts with google. Tried to fix this by installing gapps (Nano/pico/mini/full) but no luck. Anyone has solution for this?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] t3mplar:
After using the ROM for few days, I must say that it is an absolute delight to use it. Battery life is excellent, with approximately 5 hours SOT. I did have to tweak the permissions and privacy to disable background applications and wake locks. Phone is stable and never had any random reboot or crashes. Thanks a ton!!!
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Tesla:
So camera is still not quite right. But other camera app works. What quality loss can i expect coming from stock TW?

How do you users rate this ROM over stock when it comes to battery?

I would like to try this ROM but i find my self asking.. what would i gain from it? In stock everything is boring, but works.

Can you good folks answer that question non bias?

Tesla
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xztrazil:
What did you tweak to have 5 hours SOT? What app did you use?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] kickace7:
so we still have to install this wakelock app for note 4, thought flashing custom rom would fix the problem. :( :confused:

I was fine on Dr ketans rom.
[General Questions and Answers] roamin:
Hello

I would like to know if theres a way I can turn on and off my Samsung galaxy tab 10.1 t530 with my pc

I use the tablet for Aida64 and for the tablet to display all of my pc's sensor values.

Ultimately i would like to mount it in my desk but the way i want to do it means i wont have access to the power button on the tablet.

I dont care if i need a custom rom on it or i have to buy a certain piece of software. All I want it to do is turn on when my pc is on, turn it off when my pc sleeps/shuts down.

Thank you

Ricky.
[General Questions and Answers] Droidriven:
I doubt it's possible to do that in an automated manner. Probably the closest thing you can get to that is to have the device connected via USB, then make sure the device has "deep sleep" enabled, you might have to modify the device to add support for deep sleep.

With this setup, the tablet should stay on at all times but drop into deep sleep when PC is not being used, when PC is restarted or wakened, the tablet screen will come back on because PC will be charging the tablet via USB. The one drawback to this is that if the PC or device isn't used for a while then it may drain the battery until it powers off even while in sleep mode,.....but I've had my tablet on and running in deep sleep for 2-4 weeks and still have 50% battery so the the battery dying might not ever be an issue for you if you use the PC/tablet often.

I DO NOT PROVIDE HELP IN PERSONAL MESSAGE, I DO NOT TAKE REQUESTS IN PERSONAL MESSAGE, YOU WILL BE IGNORED. KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[General Questions and Answers] sd_shadow:
possibility a Tasker solution to this
[General Questions and Answers] Droidriven:
Would that work from the device in a powered off state?

I DO NOT PROVIDE HELP IN PERSONAL MESSAGE, I DO NOT TAKE REQUESTS IN PERSONAL MESSAGE, YOU WILL BE IGNORED. KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[General Questions and Answers] sd_shadow:
most android devices (that I have) , power on when usb is powered on
[General Questions and Answers] Droidriven:
That I know of, Samsung doesn't, when powered off and connected to USB, it only starts the charge cycle, it does not power the device on.

I DO NOT PROVIDE HELP IN PERSONAL MESSAGE, I DO NOT TAKE REQUESTS IN PERSONAL MESSAGE, YOU WILL BE IGNORED. KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[General Questions and Answers] sd_shadow:
that could be, have not used any Samsung devices

easy to check

power off pc, power off android device

connect usb cable to both,

power on the PC
[General Questions and Answers] Droidriven:
I've owned several samsung, that doesn't do anything on any of them that I know of, I wish it did, it would make some things much different in the user experience. It could just be me though, it often is.

I DO NOT PROVIDE HELP IN PERSONAL MESSAGE, I DO NOT TAKE REQUESTS IN PERSONAL MESSAGE, YOU WILL BE IGNORED. KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[General Questions and Answers] sd_shadow:
a good place to look for solutions for things like this is

https://xdaforums.com/u/reusing-devices/