yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[LG Watch Urbane] endrancer:
ok. handwriting is not available for me too, regardless ok google works.

while at first it was really draining battery and sluggish, performance increased after about an hour or so. being on wear2.0 the second day now, everything settled anf feels butter smooth. while on the first day i saw battery got decreased 10 % more than usual, will have to investigate how that will turn out today, but obviously with a new system some might use the watch a bit more active for the time being to figure things out.
[LG Watch Urbane] adrianburns:
"OK google" and handwriting input are both now working for me. Maybe it was still downloading English UK language packs in the background? Also, to extend battery life, I've disabled "Always-on display" - Had a predicted use time of just 2 hours with this enabled (I easily got through 1-2 days before the update), so had little choice but to disable it.

I have noticed a messaging bug too... I open Contacts app, select a person, select a number to message (e.g. "mobile" or "home")... Then, instead of it asking me for the message, Assistant asks me "Which number?" I'd like to message, despite already confirming that with the previous tap... I say the number ("mobile" or "home") and it enters that word as the actual message itself... So the labelling "Which number?" should actually be "Message?" - the flow is somehow out of sync - if that makes sense!
[LG Watch Urbane] buru898:
Not yet, was hoping it would just work but a reset sounds needed.
[LG Watch Urbane] jim828282:
It's still a little laggy after reset but with several reboots it's smoother than old version.

I also turn off the animation in developer options.
[LG Watch Urbane] adrianburns:
Update: So, before the 2.0 update, I'd get 1-2 days of use between charges, with display always-on enabled... After the 2.0 update, I'm getting 4-5 hours of use, with display always-on DISABLED... My battery is absolutely being killed by something! Anyone else getting such poor battery performance?
[LG Watch Urbane] endrancer:
Normal use.

Screen always on

Wifi off

GPS "via Phone" on

BT on

Apps which might be going on in the background:

- g-fit, weather sync (weather broadcast)

Gesendet von meinem PLK mit Tapatalk
[LG Watch Urbane] Kidshady:
Unfortunately, handwriting keyboard is also missing for me. I've also noticed a majority of the complaints​ others have explained, but I'd like to give things time to Settle in.
[LG Watch Urbane] endrancer:
Anyone knows how or where together feature is located in aw2 after it has been shut down as stand alone app ?

Gesendet von meinem PLK mit Tapatalk
[LG Watch Urbane] glgaglro:
Flash AW2 to Urbane 2nd ed?

Has anyone tried flashing the AW2 for the urbane (1st ed) to their urbane 2? I'm considering trying it...not thrilled with prospect of waiting another month for the OTA release. Any thoughts?
[LG Watch Urbane] endrancer:
i guess since they fixed "the bug" you 2nd gen urbane will get the update in a very short time.
[LG Watch Urbane] graysonguo:
:good:
[LG Watch Urbane] ahalol:
After flashing the 2.0, my watch cannot set up google account. After resetting it, it couldn't even sync the apps. Does anyone else have the same problem?
[LG Watch Urbane] mustafakhalid:
Hi, it keeps saying 'failed to read command' halfway through the sideload. Please help!
[LG Watch Urbane] Sparksys:
So after flashing ota..the watch became slow so I did a factory reset and after that it's stuck on "checking updates"

Any solution for that? :(
[LG Watch Urbane] meibourne:
I have same issue. To resolve, you put the button in side of the watch. Go to the parameter, tap on setup google account et finish setting account on the phone.
[LG Watch Urbane] adrianburns:
I've set screen brightness to 1, re-enabled "always-on" display, disabled wifi and changed the watch face I was using, and I'm now getting 12+ hours. I can live with that, but hopefully it'll settle down to something like 16+ hours eventually.
[LG Watch Urbane] jhonfrerock:
i got an error anyone can help me

i just try to update this via adb but when i go to recovery mode and a hit the command adb sideload aw2.zip (this was how i rename it )

it says

error: device '(null)' not found

plus before doing anything i check adb devices and it shows me the watch , do i have to unlock bootloader ? or do another process.
[LG Watch Urbane] Kidshady:
Is it not finding the file path? At that point of the process you can type "adb sideload" then drag the file to the adb window and drop it. It will automatically put in the correct file path.
[LG Watch Urbane] DrRyder:
I got the OTA flashed last night through the method posted on page 1 and it worked beautifully. Apps work great, "OK Google" works, the new keyboard works even with swiping for letters which is really nice. I have no issues at all. Been off the charger since about 11:30 AM, its now about 3:30 PM and I'm at 91% battery and use an always-on screen as part of the Tom Clancy's The Division watch face that I use. Very glad to have this and loving the new way notifications show up.
[LG Watch Urbane] brgroover:
same error...
[LG Watch Urbane] asus5:
Hi after the ota update of android wear 2.0 i cannot find how to answer a call from my watch all i have is to cancel the call, anyone having this issue.
[LG Watch Urbane] Voltor46:
Just flashed AW2.0, the phone's Bluetooth does recognize the watch but Android Wear app doesn't. I can't set the watch up.

Any help?

My phone is a Xiaomi Mi5s, running under Miui 8.3 (Android 6.0).
[LG Watch Urbane] Benhoze2k5:
?

Hi All!

I have quick question about the ota.

If I make the update to aw2 eith the ota version, will I get the same result as I will get with the official update (which I will be able to do through my watch)? Or it is better to wait for that?

Thanks!!
[LG Watch Urbane] Sparksys:
I had no luck getting aw 2.0 to work so I decided to get back to 1.5

I flashed AW 1.5 system.img and boot.img and I ended up with a bootloop!!

I reflashed them again but also a bootloop!

What could I do! Please tell me
[LG Watch Urbane] endrancer:
do you have any other image files?

for example where's boot.img?

probably android wear 2.0 uses very diffrent kernel which is not compatible with 1.5, there should be a MM complete rom which has all bells and whites, you might also check the rom by skin1988 found in this sub-forum and see if you can flash that.

always also try to wipe data, bootloader should always be accessable, you might also want to try some options with twrp.

lastly you could try flashing 2.0 again and again.
[LG Watch Urbane] lesther70:
i cant flash error: protocol fault (no status)
[LG Watch Urbane] jbmatson:
You probably need to update to the latest version of adb.
[LG Watch Urbane] Sparksys:
I flashed 2.0 again and it worked..I just had to reinstall Android Wear app on my phone
[LG Watch Urbane] cenwesi:
[/COLOR]

I too am looking for a solution to this problem. I really hope this is not something LG took out or disable because that is the point of having the watch if you can not tell it to answer the phone or quickly reply with a text message.
[LG Watch Urbane] maxim000999:
Who got the rights of the superuser?

I can not, do not punt the system partition in TWRP ..

I need to change build.prop

Without these actions, my heart rate sensor does not work...

I need to edit these lines
[LG Watch Urbane] lesther70:
i need unlock bootloader before flash?
[LG Watch Urbane] maxim000999:
No, but maybe you need to reset, through the recovery mode.
[LG Watch Urbane] asus5:
No it's not something LG took, I think it is disabled from google cause even huawei has the menu only to cancel the call and this is nonsense. I bought the watch to use it as I can take the calls from the watch and use handsfree speaker. Google please fix this issue thanks.
[LG Watch Urbane] djbrotherson:
I got my update and I'm in Canada
[LG Watch Urbane] aliminator2:
I want to downgrade to android wear 1....I don't like 2...

How i can do it?
[LG Watch Urbane] rvlnic:
I want to make a downgrade from Android wear 2 to android wear 1.5.

Someone can help me?
[LG Watch Urbane] TheFunnyT:
So I found a solution for getting the missing handwriting keyboard.

You have to go to the playstore on your watch and tehn search for "google".

One of the results should be "Google Handwriting-Input" or something like this, you will know which it is, when you see it.

Install and have fun :)
[LG Watch Urbane] aliminator2:
use this

https://xdaforums.com/watch-urbane/orig-development/rom-ext4all-skin1980-t3341598
[LG Watch Urbane] kenyap90:
LG Watch Urbane 2nd Edition (LTE) 2.0 (LINK)

LG Watch Urbane 2nd Edition (LTE) 2.0 (LINK)

07-01 03:51:45.889 6165 10197 I SystemUpdateTask: starting download of r4---sn-vgqs7ns7.gvt1.com - android.googleapis.com/packages/ota-api/lge_nemo_nemo/af88cfbc96ad65e7b728e27c2decbdc6fb0e08e8.zip
[LG Watch Urbane] sfortin:
Any link for AW2.0 for Urbane 2nd Ed / Verizon

I presume that was for the AT&T OTA that went out a few weeks ago. Anything for Verizon?
[LG Watch Urbane] Fadielzant:
Does the file still working
[ZTE Axon 7 Questions & Answers] RGreening:
Afternoon, Bit of a call for help

I have a download titled model_147387.. that is saying Download Suspended.

How do I un suspend this so it will continue to download

I'm guessing that this is related to the Update to version 7

Thanks

Richard
[ZTE Axon 7 Questions & Answers] Bomberus:
What exactly did you download?

There is no file called model_* that is related to an update.
[ZTE Axon 7 Questions & Answers] RGreening:
Hi, I've not downloaded anything, it has just appeared. It happened yesterday as well. So I assumed it was an OTA update

Thanks

Richard
[OnePlus 3T Questions & Answers] SlimJ87D:
I updated my wife's phone and also installed emojione.

Nearly all her emojis are gone. Her stupid phone is also encrypted, not sure how that happened...

How can this issue be fixed? Am I just going to have to restore a backup? Is there a guide on decrypt ING the device and restoring a phone? I saw an older thread for OnePlus 3, not sure if that still works.
[Honor 8 Questions & Answers] SALENTINVM:
Hi all, I noticed that on Honor 8 Pro we can use the monochrome sensor. Could it be an hope for us tu get this option on std honor 8?
[Samsung Galaxy S8 Guides, News, & Discussion] Eddie Hicks:
This is kind of strange. The glass on the back of the S8+ shattered from a 3 foot drop. But the screen survived a 10 foot drop. I always put my phones in cases and this video confirms my concerns about going naked. https://youtu.be/KzZdlS37tps
[Samsung Galaxy S8 Guides, News, & Discussion] BarryH_GEG:
My Note5's back glass shattered from a 18" drop a day after I got it. Spoiler alert: glass phones are fragile; especially if they land on a corner. Samsung will replace the back of the phone for $75 plus shipping so you don't have to live with it.
[Samsung Galaxy S8 Guides, News, & Discussion] tnick84:
I always use cases too. Usually just a thin lightweight one. I think his 10 foot drop with the s8 was flawed. It was more of a side drop. If it were flat I believe it would have survived. As for the back...Shameful! There is honestly no reason for the back to be glass. They could use an anodized aircraft aluminum with a good clear polymer resin coating to get the same look and added durability. Just an opinion. Thanks for sharing
[Samsung Galaxy S8 Guides, News, & Discussion] yaninowe:
yes, there is a very good reason: wireless charging.

hence why Apple is moving to glass back this year according to leaks. as things stand right now, once iPhone is exposed to water, user has to wait until charging port is dry to start charging. Galaxy s7 (or 8) does not have such limitations as user can put the phone on charging plate even when wet.
[Samsung Galaxy S8 Guides, News, & Discussion] tnick84:
Wireless charging will work with other materials other than glass. I have the v20 (metal back plate) and my wireless charging adapter works just fine. I am Samsung all the way. The only reason I have an LG is because of the Note 7 debacle. Im just saying there are other materials that can be used to get the same look and better durability. A 3 foot drop should not cause the back to shatter on a $750-$850 device, that will not interfere with wireless charging imho. Regardless, I have already preordered my s8+. It will be in a case anyway. That's why after a year or more my devices look as good as the day I unboxed them.
[Samsung Galaxy S8 Guides, News, & Discussion] yaninowe:
Well, from what I heard you need to own a back plate that supports wireless charging. The "regular" one that comes with the phone by default does not.

I'm with you on cases topic. Phones are too fragile these days.
[Samsung Galaxy S8 Guides, News, & Discussion] jayr04:
I gotta be careful cuz I like my phones raw ;)
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Mrdream94:
Another amazing rom!!!! I think i'll try this rom in future *-*

Do you have some Screenshots?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
I can't see it here, but I posted screenshots. I guess you go to the screenshot tab. I'm not sure. It doesn't show in Tapatalk.

I can say that it if you like LOS 14.1, but want Magisk,OMS and more features included then this might be for you.

Edit:

Yeah, I just viewed the thread via the web. Click the screenshot tab at the top of the thread. I thought that would add them to the original post, but apparently not.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] nico_vo:
Is ambient display enabled under display in settings?

Enviado desde mi SM-G800F mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Pat750:
Thanks for the new ROM. Great job man.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] jimmy999x:
I have a question, I would like to replace the magisk, by the normal root, the classic, is there any way?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Well,Magisk is more integrated into the system than just the MagiskManager app and patching the boot image. When Magisk is flashed with the ROM it backs up the original boot.img. I suppose you could restore that. However,as I said its a bit more integrated into the build than that,but I'd imagine that would mostly get rid of it. Have a look at the Magisk forum on here. I'm sure they have all of these answers.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Andi46:
a few questions

does this Rom pass SafetyNet check? - don't know if a virgin S5mini with StockRom ever passed it.

even when i tried to flash back StockRom after lineage os - no success. Either devices get ,,flagged'' by google with serial number of device, or it simply won't pass with S5mini

do browsers like Firefox or Gello Mod work in it? - in LOS 14.1 with Magisk they had fc...

does substratum fully work on this Rom? - according to rom updates... ?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
No it won't pass. I'm currently trying to work on a build that will pass safetynet by trying to use some build flags and adding some things to the default.prop. Someone who has succeeded in "tricking" safteynet is helping me out some. I'm not sure what the status of SELinux is for our device currently,so I'm not sure whether or not it's going to work.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Andi46:
would be AMAZING!!! the status of SE is permissive, but changed to enforcing after 2nd reboot with v12.0 - but then the browsers didn't work anymore.

I'm really looking FORWARD to this :fingers-crossed:

and of course if the update process of Rom is flawlessly working with installed substratum...
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
This was a bit of my concern..That enforcing would break things. I am not sure how to fix this as SELinux and sepolicies are not my thing. I'll try to build using some flags and additions for safetynet and see what happens. Hopefully at some point the browser problem when set to enforcing will be fixed.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] friscoboi:
So, am I right that among all these roms, none has all the oprions: quick unlock, button remapping (changigng recent to menu), privacy guard?

Have not tried Bean Stalk yet. Maybe it has it all!
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
I think all have privacy guard. Quick unlock I'm unsure. Most also have button remapping to some extent, cept for slim 7
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] friscoboi:
Whenever I try to install, it sais file is corrupted. Downloaded it twice already.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Hmm,well that would be weird. Can anyone else confirm? If so I won't be able to fix til tomorrow. I don't see why there would be a problem though.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] friscoboi:
The file has 327,72 MB here. So, apparently my download is wrong.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] diablo1881m1:


---------- Post added at 07:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:19 PM ----------
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Did you get this sorted?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] friscoboi:
Yes. I used a different mirror to download. Now it has more mb. Will try to install later today.

Edit: Installation worked!
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Mrdream94:
If i come by LOS, can i made a dirty flash?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Honestly I'm not sure. I would recommend a clean install. It is LOS based and very similar, just lots of additions. You can always try and see... After you do a backup of course.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Mrdream94:
Dirty flashed: everything seems working (i have play services crashing sometimes but i think i should reflash gapps) only one question: What's the strange tile i found on QSettings? It says "aaarrrggghhh" :silly:

EDIT:

I found this thread about this " issue"

https://xdaforums.com/oneplus-2/help/aaarrrggghhh-tile-quick-settings-drop-t3574461

And now..? :(
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Remove lucky patcher! ;)
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Mrdream94:
Mmm but Every time i need have to install it? :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Andi46:
1st impression - Really Nice!

Hi, i clean flashed it just now and it looks really nice so far. Full Substratum Themes support without reboot :good:, SU part of Magisk works, browsers work, SELinux is NOT enforcing

if you and your help manage it to trick SafetyNet and some translations it will be THE ROM for me :victory:
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Mrdream94:
You can change to enforcing on developer settigs.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Andi46:
done, if i start a browser then the phone reboots and there it ends... >10mins

switching the SELinux status really breaks something
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Mrdream94:
I hope Spookcity will fix some of bugs, including the kernel status :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Yeah,there are certainly issues with SELinux for our device still. I've been trying a few things to "trick" safteynet. The first thing I tried didn't work and what I'm trying now doesn't seem to want to boot. SELinux is being worked on by mirhciulica. Hopefully he can get these things working as it is really out of my realm. So even if I do manage to get it to pass safteynet,without some sepolicy fixes,things are still going to be broken.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Andi46:
ok that:fingers-crossed:

I'm flashing it one more time to play around a bit more ;)

Regarding SN: do you know if a virgin stock S5mini with KK, LP, MM ever passed it? if it never passed this test, i think it will be impossible... but at my side it isn't really necessary. the theme engine step FORWARD is enough for me so far
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
I have no idea. I personally don't need safetynet,but I know it's important for some things and some ppl. This is why I am trying to fool around with it. I would have to think that an unrooted,virgin stock Samsung ROM would pass,but you're right,if not it will probably be next to impossible.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Andi46:
I already tried a stock Rom (MM). Either my device got ,,flagged'' before by google (serial number,IMEI) or it simply won't function

but i'd read some S5 users where it was possible... :confused:
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
OK,good to know and interesting. Would be nice if anyone else has passed SN on a stock Samsung ROM.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Andi46:
yes, and if so the dev of Magisk has to get the boot image... ;)
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Well,I've built an enforcing kernel with some flags I hoped may fix the safteynet problem.

It seems maybe the browser crash issue may be solved. I'm not sure. Only tested on LOS14.1 with gello. Still fails safetynet though either way.

Edit: Just tested with Firefox. No crashes so far.

Edit II: After flashing and enabling root via magisk the browser crash is back. So perhaps its a su/sepolicy issue. I'm unsure. Just throwing things out there lol
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] victoraraujo2:
G800H? :'(
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
I don't own the G800H and the device related trees are still at CM13 (MM) There would be changes necessary that I would almost certainly not be able to achieve without owning the device, sorry.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] victoraraujo2:
Okay :/
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Bencha82:
Is there a working kernel mod for this Rom with 1.5 GHz?
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
I'm currently working on a kernel for nougat ROMS with the MM sources. Can't say when it'll be ready. Hopefully in the not too distant future, but it's all about me having the time to do it.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Bencha82:
Take your time ;) . For me this is the best Rom :gut: . Thanks for the development and work
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] a-dead-trousers:
The stock ROM passes SN flawlessly!

A coworker has the S5 mini with stock ROM.

He recently got updated to 6.0.1 (MM) and I asked him if he could test SN.

EDIT:

If someone else has problems after returning back to Stock from any other ROM, maybe their KNOX is compromised.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] :
Wow I didn't even know that this ROM existed! You should create a way for us to track what you've released. Maybe like an email group or something. Thanks for the ROM anyway! I'll try it out right now!
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] Andi46:
yepp, i think the KNOX counter prevents SN passing with stock rom on already custom rom flashed S5 minis... and because the SELinux/policies part isn't working as it should we'll have no success on this device. I mean the KNOX counter in my S4 mini is also tripped, but there everything works with LOS 14.1 (7.1.2) and magisk-v12.0...

anyway, waiting for the new build where browsers work and magisk is banned... there've been some really nice features in it... :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Not a bad idea. I may look into doing something like this. If you like LOS, but want theming and other features I would think you would like this ROM.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] :
The most important "feature" of this ROM, is the fact that the quick settings background color is correct ;)
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Hehe, strange how it's different on LOS. Either way, glad it's correct!
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] :
Maybe I can upload this SystemUI apk so that other people who are currently using LAOS, can try to install this and see if it works.
[Galaxy S5 Mini Android Development] spookcity138:
Not real sure if that would work or not. Either way,it's worth a shot. I'm sure those who have this issue would appreciate it.