yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
Hi guys, I did a full charge from 16% to 90% which takes around 1 hour and 40.minutes. I did see the value of 2000 appears in the app called ampere when the screen is on. Is this normal for the fast charge? For whatever reason, I always feel that the charge time is the same no matter I enable the fast charge or not. The Ampere does display the value of 2000 but the phone is still cold. I suspect that the value of 2000 is just a display figure. The real charge rate remains on the stock value 1200.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] sunshine199724:
When i have just turn on screen
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
I used to have the fast charge work. I can feel the warmth of the battery position when the fast charge works. If the phone stays cold. It is more likely that the phone charges in the normal rate. The fast charge works sometimes but does not work sometimes. In your case, the temperature of your battery is 26 degree. It does not work as well.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] sunshine199724:
Sometimes it charge very slow
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
You already repeatedly told this. Re-re-re-repeatedly. You posted same posts also in MagMa thread. You either have deficient cable or your charger does not work good.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] jhunt75:
From my experience, it has been the cable that is causing the issue.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] sunshine199724:
No , because it happens when i turn off my screen . I turn on my screen, it will increase to 2000mA after a minute
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
Hi Eleo,

In lss kernel, the value in the Ampere decreases while the screen is on. By using this kernel, the Ampere goes the opposite way by increasing the value to the 2000 while the screen is on. Maybe Sunshine1997 is right.

I did purposely by not letting the screen goes off(just leave the screen on but not using the phone), the back of my phone gets warmer. The Ampere displays 2000 constantly.

At the same time, I have never seen the value of 300 by using the ac charge according to the screenshot of Sunshine1997. It is too low. Maybe the cable does have the issue.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
300mA? You get 300mA charging when screen is on? Unless you get it, you are not talking about same issue;)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
Yes. I agree with you. I just edited my post. 300 mah is unusual.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
You should have done that earlier. Though you too had issues with lss3.8's fast charge. I'd say wait for more users to report. Maybe you both have cable issues
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
In my case, the fast charge works intermittently. I still would like to know the reason for increasing the value of the charge while the screen is on.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ocujos:
You need a good quality cable and a high current charger to achieve 2A charging current. This works for me all the time!

When screen is on, it draws current, so you probably won't get full 2A charging, but should be very close.

Btw, I charge my Note 3 with an Apple iPad charger (2.1A) and a very thick, genuine Blackberry cable. You could also the original USB3 cable that came with your Note 3.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] kemo44:
Private mode doesn't work (on Phronesis MM v3.0)

I tried your kernel on Phronesis Rom MM v3.0, it works fine, but i noted that the private mode didn't work.

so, I flashed Lsskernel for 6.0.1 TW Roms v7.3U back on, and the private mode was back to work. but older private files were all lost.

did I do anything wrong!!

can you fix Phantom kernel to work with Phronesis MM v3.0 private mode?

and what about the lost data, do you have any trick to get it back!!

regards.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
Yeah. I feel that too on 1.2h

But after flash 1.2h* it's gone

N9005 MagMa
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
I guess I could.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Leon_Stalker:
Me too on both "h" and "h*", coincidentally I'd installed L Speed and thought that was it causing this lag. Then I went back to "g" and the lag now is gone, after this I reinstalled L Speed and the lag still gone so I'm pretty sure that it's kernel related.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] TurricanM3:
I flashed Phronesis6 today and i had the charge problem 3x times now. I'm already using 1.2h*. =(

It's not connected to a charger, just laying on my keyboard but it thinks its getting charged (sorry for the bad quality):
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] af974:
Wow this is a strange bug. It happens with every Rom and kernel?

I checked your video after your reply and in fact my reply was intended to the people that were having the 0ma problem not to your charging while not in charge problem.

;)

Edit: when you have the bug try to check this:

Use a root explorer and navigate to /sys/class/power_supply/battery

Open the file charge_now. Disconnected from charger it must be 0, connected=1
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] sykoj82:
I've noticed it as well...I thought it was the s8 launcher.. I guess I'll uninstall L-Speed (performance profile) try a different governor reboot and see what happens..

But I got awesome stand by time though today...i left the note 3 at home ...12.5 hours and lost 6% with stock kernel settings with this latest phantom version. Had about 7 missed calls, other notifications, yeah stupid Facebook app is installed, got those notifications, Google, email, etc and this is a stock battery is almost 2 1/2 years old, slept like a baby.. im assuming I would of lost 3-4% or possibly less if I didn't have known high battery apps installed and didn't have L-Speed on performance (if that makes a difference on stand by)... Also no Greenify is installed, just realized that.

Overall this kernel rocks!! Thanks dev!

Verizon n900v darklord s7e v4
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
For those who wander why the small drop in performance is happening...

In D.V.1.2h and 1.2h* phantom governor was updated to be more battery friendly. It's stated in the changelog. As I already explain in a post earlier you can't have both performance and battery life. Phantom is quite balanced between these two, in my opinion, so by making it more battery friendly it will give less performance. I can change it back but I'm not sure that it's in our best interests. Maybe you can vote and let me know with it's best for you (performance or battery).
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] aboraide.alhareeze:
performance
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] donvito62:
Battery For Me :)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Josueden69:
It's Ok, If I really need performance, i only change to interactive for a while.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] moroo:
performance
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] cafe-creme:
According to the usage of each person, rom...etc it is not obvious to satisfy every demand.

For daily use, best is to have a kernel battery friendly.

I have no lags in this stage (no games) and the performances are very, very good with latest kernel.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] svbarbosa:
Battery always in default settings.

Those who want performance should tweak the kernel.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
Battery friendly of course. If performance is needed, it can be adjusted manually
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Andrew59:
I don't see any controversial question here. Everybody can do his own settings according to his own preferences.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
This change it's not a parameter or tweak, it's the way phantom governor works. The question is: shall it be more battery or performance oriented.

It's like trying to be more like yankactive (more aggressive) or interactive (less aggressive) in terms of timings choosing frequencies of CPU policy.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] af974:
My 2cent

Rename actual phantom to phantom_Max and use it to be much battery friendly and put the previous phantom as well, so people can choose what they want.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Dan0v:
im with your opinion but what can i do to increase performance.. for example i need to open gps apps and receive calls etc same time "have no space for games" , so before going on the ride what sittings to change from your wide knowledge, for me : activate cpu boost, maximize cpu frequency and maybe chnge governor to lionheart but i like to stay with phantom, lionheart will eat battery quickly "maybe coz I'm used to phantom i see it quick not sure"
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
I thought about it... But I don't see the point of having almost the same governor twice. Plus I'm not sure how much savings is actually done. Hadn't had the time to test it properly.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
You dont need to change to increase performance even if 6h0st makes phantom more battery-friendly. It still handles gps, maps and etc functions very well.

You may need to increase performance when you play power consuming games (like 3d online games) or when doing a multimedia editing (video editing/rendering, professional photo editing (not from basic photo editor)) and etc. For that as you said you can return maxcpu to 2256, increase voltage of cpu (if you have undervolted), increase maxGPU (from 450 yo 499) if using graphics (games, multimedia and etc). Otherwise phantom governor is still very good in stock settings.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] syamsoul:
for me, the current phantom govenor is already very good.

so for my opinion, if possible, a governor which can save as much as battery as it could without sacrificing the full potential and ability of our phone i.e a balanced profile.

there is no point of having a battery friendly profile, which can save more battery but slow and sluggish when we urgently need to use our phone.

however it is very much depends on how people use their phone.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] sionizer:
Battery friendly for me

Inviato dal mio SM-N930F utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
On the latest version
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
And how is it compared to 1.2g? That's the question here. Is it worth it? Should I revert from 1.2h* to 1.2g working mode? Or keep it like this?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] jufegoco:
As you said it's perfect as it is. If someone like performance then he/she use 1.2g and if he/she wants battery.. Then he/she use 1.2 h. We only can say thank you and you only do your excellent work without any worries... You are great! Thank you!

Enviado desde mi SM-N930F mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
The pictures are belong to 1.2f

And am revert back to 1.2f
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] jufegoco:
It's a difficult question... I don't know how they are compared but I feel it's more battery friendly for much in 1.2h*

I think you don't "should" do nothing... Your work is great and each one here has different options to decide what he/she likes... If someone doesn't like your work he/she can decide to use another governor or settings in your kernel or simply change the kernel... Is not as simple like that?

Enviado desde mi SM-N930F mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] jufegoco:
Mmmmm this picture is in 1.2h*... It's very similar to yours...

This make me think if each phone it's a world why 6h0st must change for each of them? We can choose what we want between all the options... [emoji4]

Enviado desde mi SM-N930F mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Vordx:
1- Why they keep posting their battery usage while they aren't even using it and just showing a straight line . That's weird.

Learn from how Eleo makes his comparations.

2-battery friendly or balanced ofc. If they want more performance then just change their settings.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] kiss.bd2@facebook.com:
Which rom ??? You use plz
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] luigi97777:
With which kernel?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
MagMa

---------- Post added at 02:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:56 PM ----------

The pictures belong to 1.2f

Tested 1.2h/h* few days, now am back to 1.2f
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] kiss.bd2@facebook.com:
Which phon model 'Which bl 'Which cp. 'Which rom ( magma or dark lord rebon . ) which kernal . Varsion . Which app you use more time . On screan plzzz
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Vordx:
See ? Why people can't learn how to post full information from the beginning instead of just wasting time and space or even worse (adding one new information in one new post, forever). And btw your post with screenshots in 2 different times with a straight line and not showing what was used during that SOT. If u ask me or many other users, not close to helpful.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Leon_Stalker:
Phantom gov is good enough for daily use with normal apps, didn't see any annoying lag on 1.2h/h*.

Anyway, I use my own kernel tweak(since 1.2a) doing a setup in Lionheart gov parameters, making it being more battery friendly without sacrificing performance when needed, so it is smooth as butter when I'm playing heavy games(consuming a good battery juice, of course) and achieving 5h+ SOT when using normal apps with mobile data. But in 1.2h/h* it was giving so much lag when playing games that I decided to go back to 1.2g, and my setup is working pretty good on that.

So, I believe that this lag that I mentioned is something missing with the GPU (gov, or missing driver[?]), Not the CPU govs.

Magma-UX3

N9005

CP: BOL1

BL: BPL4
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] kiss.bd2@facebook.com:
Sorry sir . That is fake
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] pelucaslee:
To download older versions?

I want to test the f version and see if it makes such good consume on my phone.

Thank you

Enviado desde mi SM-N930F mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Dan0v:
can you share your lionheart tweak
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] reddev94:
Can you post your full settings on Kernel Auditor ? Thanks
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
Might have found something. I'll take a look and test your theory.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Lola22i:
I prefer battery

Thank you so much ?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
Changing kernels does not help me or others here. Testing and finding things to make phantom kernel better does. That is why I'm asking people here about there opinions.

Thank you for considering my work as to be great. I appreciate it.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] atarek:
I'll vote for battery .

Rom:darklord reborn.

Kernel:1.2h*

N9005

Thanks alot for ur effort to keep kernel better.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] viper531986:
Battery
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] aly+mohy1:
Battery
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] fabiodedo:
Bb Aa Tt Tt Ee Rr Yy
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Andrew59:
Das ist phantastisch©:D.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Leon_Stalker:
Here it go.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Leon_Stalker:
Hope I could be helpful. Cheers!
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 12gage:
I'd say balance, as much battery as possible without noticeable lag. And as long as there are gov/configurations to switch to for gaming I don't think the phantom defaults need to be changed. Not sure if that helps, I guess I really didn't pick a side :)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
I flashed 1.2h* again to retest it, but till now still facing the lag with that version

....................

Tomorrow i'll back again to 1.2f
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
Other settings still as default
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
I'll vote to performance
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
Your bootloader and baseband version is too old. Try update from here.

And you judge phantom kernel by using zzmoove governor. I dont think your vote counts.

Sorry.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] txx3:
i would vote for battery, but i say your vote is valid!
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
Every one will vote for what he need, i just don't care about battery.

I respect your vote
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Vordx:
Can you at least try to think and understand before u start posting ?

6h0st asked about changes in his phantom governor , and you were using zzmoove this whole time (or at least that's what your screenshot was showing) , so ofc Eleo had a point there.

This is a developers website.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] zack483:
I sorry. Can u add a function when phone in darkest place, the screen will be the lowest bright. I think its possible because other kernel have this function.

I pretty sure everyone will like it.

Because when i read or watch movie in dark room,the screen still bright even i set to lowest.

Or did i miss this function on kernel auditor or what?

I already try 1.2h*. Great. Very smooth.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] sykoj82:
I would leave it as is with latest version. It's a decent balance between performance and battery..battery with the upper hand

---------- Post added at 09:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 PM ----------

I agree
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] sunshine199724:
Can i have KA scipt to know how they change value. So i can create init script to change it. I just want to study about them and i hate using app too
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
You can head to kernel adiutor thread and see sources. Or decompile app and read. I can try help you too.

You can use light filtering apps like bluelight filter. There is an option on kernel adiutor/display menu but it doesnt work the same way
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
1.2h*

(Activate or deactivate) USB Fast Charge still get the same result (900 mA)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
Fast charge is not done through kernel adiutor. Copy script from /sbin/scripts to /system/etc/init.d, then open it and configure as explained by 6h0st
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
Will try that, i repost again

---------- Post added at 11:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:10 AM ----------

Can't done with it, can you explain the steps (one by one) for me.

Thnx in advance.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Hereiwas:
Change the values as shown below
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
You forgot this. Change 0 to 2.

Without failsafe it will not change to custom

If you read in parenthesis, values say "for failsafe enabled"
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Hereiwas:
Yes, yu're right mate. But here works the same
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] |mickey:
Can you guys test this out.. Eleo as I did replace echo to 2 I got no fastcharge working... leaving it at 0 has worked for me as it as worked for Hereiwas...

Maybe there's something we're missing or not fully understanding...
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
May I confirm that the fast charge does work on your phone or it just displays the value of 2100 on your app? My fast charge never works. In theory, the value should be changed to 2 in the fail safe section on order to activate the fast charge function.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
It charges 2100mA when set to 2100mA. You had the same thing from looong time ago

That is default number, 0. If it works for you, then how come it doesnt work for the other user? I dont use fast charging anymore because I have battery packs and available plug for charging
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] |mickey:
well it does show and charge faster, so I'd say it is working and showing on the app too... are you sure you're charger is not faulty? maybe the cable even?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Hereiwas:
There will be a reason for sure if it works even if the "master" value is on 0 instead on 2, anyway, all that i know guys, is that it works and for me it is enough....;)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
Now I bought the battery pack so I can charge the battery externally. However I am just curious why the fast charger never works on my phone. It has been quite long time as I gave up the fast charge. But I was thinking if the value of fail safe is the issue for me as I always changed to 2.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] atarek:
I've not copy fast recharge script and it shows with my power bank (Model:Samsung 10k mA and support fast charge) 1500 and max is 1800 is that normal ?!

Correct me if i'm wrong this feature shouldn't be applied until i copy fast charge script.

Kernel:1.2h* default settings without any tweaks

Rom:darklord reborn.

also there is in battery settings fast cable charging but i'm disabling it.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Eleo:
As I said I dont use it. And I dont know whether it does or doesnt work correctly. If it works the way you suggested, then we need to inform [MENTION=4326291]6h0st[/MENTION] that there is a fault on fast charge script, sonthat he can fix it. Without changing the first value to "2" it doesnt matter what you do below it, because it doesnt get applied. The second value fromtop to bottom (echo 2), that is not in the selectable portion, is to show that anything below this gets applied only if you choose echo 2 on first choice.

See explanations of how it works (or at least how it should work)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
I was curious why fast charge never works even I have 3 batteries now. I always change the value to 2 in the fail safe section. Anyway, it does not bother me. I found that the battery pack is so convenience. Charging externally then change a battery.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Hereiwas:
It's not hard to understand how it works, but if i set it to echo2 doesn't work while if i leave it on 0 it works! And it's working for sure: first two ss are from a rom with modded script seconds two ss are from rom with no modded script. Use DualBoot and i can switch between five roms at the moment. It's clear that there is something wrong in to the script.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] GabrielSebastianMoise:
It's ok like it is right now ! You've done a great work for us .:good:
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
Still undone with it "it's still 900 mA"

Here is the steps that i follow

1. Go to /sbin/scripts/

2. Open & edit (99fast_charge)

3. Change what you mentioned

.........

- i did't reboot my phone

- connected to PC UBS 2.0

- original cable
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] af974:
I never used it but the script works fine.

Remember to execute the script after the changes or either reboot otherwise it will not work.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Hereiwas:
Check my screenshot in my previous post, you need to change also other values! [MENTION=5470545]ousasma[/MENTION] take a looh at the ss

Sorry mate but what are you talking about...here is working too
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] af974:
Sorry mate but you said" it's clear that something wrong into the script" so my reply was intended for checking that script works fine, there are no errors in it.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Hereiwas:
If you read from the beginning you can understand mate
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] ousasma:
Still undone, i almost give up

Tell me what's the wrong exactly
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
Just change the charging level. (AC, USB, WiFi).

Leave other stuff just the way it is.

Failsafe value leave it at 0 (it can only be 1 or 0).

Execute the script or copy it to init.d and reboot.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] 6h0st:
Available values are listed above the "echo" lines not below. They all have # in front of them meaning that they will be skipped and are used as comments in the script.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] choosetobelieve:
Hi 6h0st,

In my case, I can see the value of 2000 without the issue in the app. But I know for the fact that the value is just for a display purpose as it still takes around 2 hours to the full charge from around 10%. In short, with or without the fast charge, the charge time remains the same which is around 2 hours. I was curious the cause for so long time. Do you know why? It is definitely the original cable and adapter. Thanks