yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Google Pixel XL Questions & Answers] Slusho:
Hmm. That wording is ambiguous. Actually, I just noticed it does appear on my HTC One M9. So now I'm wondering why this behavior occurs on some of the phones but not others. My Moto X 2014, for example, does not display it.
[Google Pixel XL Questions & Answers] dragonsofcp:
This feature came in the recent Google play services update. Soon your family members phones will all do the same.

Edit: If you want that feature on other phones sooner just go to apkmirror and get the newest play services.
[Google Pixel XL Questions & Answers] Slusho:
Okay, that explains it. I did notice that the notification was from Google Play Services. Thanks.
[Verizon LG V10] wantsohan:
My sister gave me a LG V10 (VS990) which was bought from Amazon.com from USA. I live in Bangladesh. All option works great. BUT I can not turn on my "Mobile Hotspot" option. When i try to turn it ON it says,

"A Verizon Wireless LTE SIM card is not detected. Mobile Hotspot/Mobile Broadband Connect/Bluetooth tethering service needs a Verizon Sim card in order to work." ...

I tried every possible solution i can do. But nothing worked. :( :( :( .... Since i don't have a Verizon sim and if i had the sim, it wouldn't work. Because my country doesn't have Verizon. ....

I Flashed my V10 with couple of official stock ROMs around 4-5 times ( Both Lollipop and Marshmallow) ... BUT THE PROBLEM REMAINS . ...

I searched many sites and Googled my problem but got NO Slotution ..... Then I tried to find Custom Rom.... But there were no Custom ROM for my beloved V10... :crying: ..... Not even in " Cyanogenmod " .....

Now i can not use "SHAREit" apps because of not turning on my mobile hotspot ....

FYI :- i can send files through SHAREit But can not receive any files .........

Details about my LG V10:

Model number: VS990

Hardware version: Rev.1.0

Android version: 6.0 (Marshmallow)

Kernel version: 3.10.84-g41d65a3-00004-gb705474 lge@android-build

Build Number: MRA58K

Configuration version: B15.LGE.VS990.0

Software version: VS99022A

Is there anyone who can give me a solution, please ???[/B]
[Verizon LG V10] proplayer44:
There is a fix but if you can't root it won't work. And if you are on Marshmallow you can't root, or go back to Lollipop in order to root. So you are currently SOL, unless things change.

I may be wrong, some others may explain why I'm wrong.
[Verizon LG V10] beavis5706:
FoxFi will allow tethering without root or a tethering plan. I'm not sure if this will work for you but there is a free version to try.
[Verizon LG V10] wantsohan:
I already downgraded from Marshmallow to Lollipop, i flashed my v10 with "LGUP" ..... I can root now, i rooted my phone once....

So can you just tell me the fix ???? It would help me a lot.. :) . Thanks.
[Verizon LG V10] wantsohan:
Sorry to say, but also tried this method..... foxfi does NOT work.... i even rooted my phone but that did not help ... :(
[Verizon LG V10] proplayer44:
I need to be able to send you a file.

Can you accept files in email?
[Verizon LG V10] wantsohan:
Yeah, Sure !! ... Send me the files . My Email: y.shahriar@gmail.com
[Verizon LG V10] enigma2446:
[MENTION=1133078]proplayer44[/MENTION] wow you have been busy

"Mvno Master"
[Verizon LG V10] dangtoi1993:
Bro, how do you downgraded this VS900 from 6.0 to 5.x . (i try LGUP to instal KDZ file, but i got "antiroll back" error)

---------- Post added at 01:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:56 AM ----------

Bro, how do you downgraded this VS900 from 6.0 to 5.x . (i try LGUP to instal KDZ file, but i got "antiroll back" error)
[Verizon LG V10] enigma2446:
At the moment you can't, litteraly you are SOL till someone gains root on 6.0

"Mvno Master"
[Verizon LG V10] Gshegs:
I have the same problem too. Someone please kindly offer me some help
[Verizon LG V10] trouble.:
How did u do that.
[Verizon LG V10] Fredrick Lemuel:
Guys i have the same problem.

I have tried every rooting app i knew ,with or without computer but still ibwas unable. Please can someone help me out. Because i cant pair with other phones through wifi and hospot
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] TJTITAN:
Good Day!

I got my SM-910A and the network status stays only on emergency calls, bought it in for repairs and found out it that the motherboards needs to go changed. So I was looking on online to buy a new motherboard and the att one is expensive, which is a price for a used one about $99+. So I looked at the tmobile and its less expensive.

So can anyone advice that buying a tmobile board, is wise to put in a at&t device?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] Trex888:
I believe so far its not possible

I have at&t s4 and i am looking forward to replace it with diffrent model motherboard but many technician says not possible cuz rest of the hardware is also at&t based and will not match the the motherboard:confused:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] apxi84:
seems like at least one person did it

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=67836897&postcount=3873
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] TJTITAN:
Interesting find, I read through the thread and it works good, expect the he gets a notification saying he doesn't the proper sim.

I live outside the US, live in the Caribbean Saint Lucia, the bands won't make much scene for me but my carriers are also gsm running on 4G. I try it myself in two weeks or three.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] AlexanderDAB:
both phones are basically the same

just that one has an unlocked bootloader, while one is completely dead in development

you won't be able to use all the bands on the phone, but besides that

you are getting more than what you paid for
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] dsbeck314:
It will work I've done it before
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] memeblu:
Swap

I want to get this correct would the T-Mobile Charging Flex Cable Port Works With The AT&T Main Board?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] dsbeck314:
Yes it would work just fine
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 4] phamanhvu01:
It will. Using an AT&T Note 4 here, with SK Telecom (Exynos variant) motherboard. No locked bootloader included.

Had issues with camera though, but I guess I'll eventually figure that out. Shouldn't be a problem to you though, since you are going to use motherboard from the T-Mobile ones anyway.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sirdashadow:
I'm having some problems with overlapping channels in my area. Is there any way to change the wifi channel Fire Stick (2nd gen) uses from Channel 1? Would be nice to move it to 6 or 11. Same thing with the 5ghz band as well but the 2.4ghz band worries me the most because I have a lot of devices that rely on it.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] harlekinwashere:
Used this as a test how many people still are taking supporting novice Fire TV users seriously.

Result, not many. (This is the result of flooding an enthusiast community with product support and "piracy not working, what now " questions, because novice bought box with the label "free" on it - also the result of depending on a product blogger and step by step tutorials to find your way around, and fleeing from a "community" as soon as your problems are "solved"...)

Here is your answer. You change Wifi channels in your router, not in the end device.

If your router hides this option from you, get a different router. Its a commonplace feature in even the cheapest routers and also in most ISP routers for that matter.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ichijoe:
It's also worth pointing out that the AFTV2... Possibly the AFTS2? Does NOT like anything above Channel 48 (a/n/ac @5Ghz).

e.g. You can only use the lowest bands (Ch's 36 - 48), if you want it to work.

Again you will need to adjust this from the Router / MODEM!
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] neppie:
Fire devices do broadcast WiFi

This is a legit question (some dismissed it, assuming the original post was referring to the network the device was receiving from). The Firestick/FireTV broadcasts a "Hidden" Wi-Fi network. It is used for the remote, I believe. Mine is on channel 11 and, yes, it would be nice change it. I am connecting to someone else's router (also 11) and do not have permission to change there.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vic_singh:
I'm facing the same issue as there is no solution. It's pretty frustrating because I have serious interference.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DJCoates:
Fire Stick WiFi Hidden SSID

Hi,

I have come across the same issue and unfortunately do not have any answers, only more information. My daughter has a Fire Stick connected to a Virgin Media broadband / WiFi router (ARRIS).

The router's 2.4GHz primary SSID channel was configured to 11 (20MHz). The Fire Stick was broadcasting a hidden SSID on channel 11 at about the same power level.

I switched the router to channel 1. The Fire Stick changed the channel that the hidden SSID is broadcast on to channel 1 at the same time (pretty much).

I can only conclude that the Fire Stick broadcasts its hidden SSID on the same channel as the one that it is using for its WiFI connection to an access point / router.

I suspect that this is due to a limitation in the wireless electronics of the Fire Stick.

I cannot find any Fire Stick configuration to change its WiFi channel.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TimmyP:
Can we just keep this account disabled?
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] krsmit0:
I believe this is because the way they setup WiFi direct using the same chip as the regular WiFi. It's only capable of using one channel at a time. Roku does this also.
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Alternate Method #1

Some users have noted that the above method doesn't seem to work, we don't know why as it seems inconsistent but we can't pin it down specifically to user error, certain model number or build, or anything else, as it works 98% of the time...

But if the above method fails, the alternative is to download and copy to SD card or internal storage SuperSU 2.62-3 ßeta version available here and flash it through TWRP like normal.
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Reserved - FAQ (oops, guess I already did that)
[X Style (Pure) General] Jorinde123:
I'm so glad I found this thread! I've been procrastenating fixing my phone because of all the crappy methods. This one very easy to follow!

But still can't manage to get my WiFi working :(

I don't get it. But somehow my nandroid backup failed too, because it's only some 2.X MB big and I don't seem to recover anything....

So I guess I'll have to keep trying..

FYI:

1) Moto X Style 6.0

2) TWRP 3.0.2-0

3) Tried both 2.78 and 2.62. Currently running 2.62

4) SYSTEMLESS=true
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Find the latest rom image for the version you have installed, and flash the radios with fastboot.
[X Style (Pure) General] Jorinde123:
Thanks for your quick reply. Tried that, didn't work.. :( The ROM i'm currently running is MPH24.49-18 btw... I'm now trying it the hard way, just reverting everything step by step. But the first step (flashing gpt.bin) is already giving me the preflash error. This is going to be a lot harder than I thought and it's been too long since I've been flashing these things.

Used to flash my Moto Milestone and my Sony X10, can you imagine.
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Because you are not on 49-18, if you were on the latest OTA for 6.0 you were on 49-18-4. Pre-flash validation failure confirms your using the wrong version. Look in my sig for the return to stock thread, there are links to current roms and discussion of the 'preflash validation error'.
[X Style (Pure) General] ban.codrut:
Wasn't systemless method only intended for not altering the system partition in such way not to break compatibility with Android Pay and such apps that don't allow root?

Maybe I got it wrong when I first saw the appearance on the scene of systemless root. From what you are saying the auto detect it's supposed to detect with which method the device is compatible (not only detects if system was already modified? let's say like by TWRP).

I wasn't able to flash SuperSu newest stable versions either, all ended up stuck at boot, except for the 2.62 version (updatable later through playstore and binaries thorugh app via normal update). Honestly I haven't tried systemless as for me I through it was a waste (as said I through it wasn't meant for other purpose).

ATM I'm using CM's own root, but I will report as soon as I will try SU again. I never had problems with modem/wifi with SU, only that it didn't boot on newer stable builds.
[X Style (Pure) General] awakenedwithin:
Got the Moto X Pure a few days ago. It came with 6.0. This procedure works. Thank you!
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
No, although that was one thing we thought we would gain (which we didn't), Systemless root is to get around Marshmallow security. Root is detected by SafetyNet API, and it detects pretty much any system modification, systemless or not
[X Style (Pure) General] SouthernEvo:
Currently Using TWRP 3.0.2.0 . Just unlocked bootloader and haven't done anything else . Recovery flash went well during the initial process of unlocking . Now Im trying to make a backup of the stock Rom , everytime I try to make one I keep getting failed at the end of the process ? Is this a known bug ? I have been doing google searches for the past hour and still unable to find anything to indicate anyone else is having this problem . Unless I didn't use the correct terms while searching . Any help would be appreciated
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
It is not a known issue... Where are you storing the backup, internal storage or SD card?
[X Style (Pure) General] SouthernEvo:
Was backing up to the SD Card . Been messing with it and now its working for some weird reason . I appreciate your quick response though
[X Style (Pure) General] ChuyitoSr:
I used windroid to unlock the bootloader and install twrp( don't reboot system but rather boot into recovery to make twrp stick) , from there I just flashed supersu and I was good to go. Many methods out there but this worked for me.
[X Style (Pure) General] Deleted member 7436581:
Thank you so much for this guide. I have to say, as a new Motorola user coming from Samsung phones exclusively, this whole process made me feel like a real noob again.

I made the switch from iOS to Android back when the Galaxy S2 came out because I grew tired of the jailbreak cat and mouse games on the iPhones and iPads. Learning to root and flash ROMs on all my subsequent Samsung devices was fairly simple and very enjoyable. This Moto X Pure though was a real tasker for me. I honestly never knew about the extra steps you had to take to unlock, twrp and root this phone. I really wish manufactures would help us make this much easier.

Anyway, thank you again for your help. I'll be seeing y'all around the forums as a new MXPE user!
[X Style (Pure) General] ban.codrut:
Thank you for clarifying a misconception I had on systemless root

(I intentioned to reply to you earlier, but the mad busy week made me forget about my intent :( )

I'm going to try right now the latest stable with systemless method (rather than flashing the older version) on a full wiped clean stock to see if it works. (Even tho I see lots of feedbacks here inspiring me to believe it would)
[X Style (Pure) General] Iglooian:
In what order?

I really appreciate the help, but I have one question. Do I flash SuperSu and then type the command into the terminal, or do I type the terminal command first?

Thanks again for your help,

Matt
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
First, a little etiquette lesson, please don't quote long posts (especially the first post) for no reason, at the very least edit it down to only show the relevant parts so people don't have to scroll through a long meaningless quote.

And to answer your question, you enter the terminal command first, then install SuperSU, that is how it is ordered in the first post instructions. If you read the entire first post, it explains what the command does, and logic therefore lets you know it must be done first.
[X Style (Pure) General] Iglooian:
Actually, it was unclear what order I was supposed to do it in; we call that a clarifying question, but thanks anyway.
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Fair enough... I will edit the "How to do it" section to make it more clear.
[X Style (Pure) General] add119:
No root method for the Moto x pure edition on Marshmallow?
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Umm... Yes, of course there is, that is what the first post of this thread explains in detail.
[X Style (Pure) General] add119:
Going to re-read that and sorry.
[X Style (Pure) General] ffejy462:
[MENTION=2001582]acejavelin[/MENTION] you can screenshot while in twrp... ☺️
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Supposedly you can since 3.0 was released, just press PWR+VOL DN like in Android... but in these cases I just used another phone to take pictures. :)
[X Style (Pure) General] ffejy462:
I was just giving you a hard time. There's something funny about pictures of a phone taken from another phone.
[X Style (Pure) General] stevejohnson42:
Excellent guide

I followed this guide fairly straight through ; excellent step by step and got me where I needed

For what it's worth - and disclaimer ; I am not a developer and just one willing to try -- I skipped the whole step about SuperUser ; I went to the point of installing TWRP , and then booting right to it -- from there I made a nandroid of the stock system on the phone that was there after unlocking the bootloader - then ; I wiped it and clean flashed a custom ROM / gapps that has root already in it. the first setup was AICP for clark

Risk here is -- I never checked or even attempted to mess with the stock ROM after the bootloader was unlocked ; made backup and saved it

Just a thought for those not really interested in sticking with stock ; for me - that was the whole point -

At the moment ( three days into it ) - I installed AICP ; MM and Nougat versions, Slim 6, and Broken ( MM ) -- I stuck with Broken for now ; the implementation of Ambient Display and the other tweaks they have gave me what I needed -
[X Style (Pure) General] renoob:
In your first picture, what keyboard style is that?

and... p.s.

does the bootloader unlocked nag screen persist?

Do you know if it can be re-locked and keep root? I don't see that the toolkit has this info.

Thanks in advance-
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
It is the keyboard built into TWRP terminal.

The unlock warning screen has nothing to do with rooting, just flash the patched logo.bin and you won't see it (although the delay and vibration will never go away).

You cannot relock unless it is PURELY stock and you have flashed a factory image completely... There is no way to lock and have root.

Toolkit? Not sure what you are talking about, I don't use or recommend toolkits unless there is no other option for the device, meaning I would never recommend a toolkit for a Moto device.
[X Style (Pure) General] renoob:
Thanks-

Don't know where I got that toolkit link. Maybe the MotoX General page,

I had many tabs open at the time and thought it was from your sig- it wasn't.
[X Style (Pure) General] d.casper.b:
Thank you for this thread. But is this seriously still a thing? Wow! When I first rooted my phone with superSU in May last year, I was stuck on the M logo. And someone I spoke to gave me these very commands and I managed to get root. In about November last year though I actually moved over to Magisk with phh's superuser though.

I see this thread was created only recently-ish. My word, how have people been rooting all this time? I've never seen this information shared (I kept the commands myself in Google Keep). Much appreciated.
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Definitely still a thing... I average helping 2-3 per week with a failed root attempt, between this thread and others on XDA, other forums, and Stack Exchange.

To be honest it's probably worse now then it was then, people flash SuperSU (or worse, old modded boot images) and it doesn't boot, so instead of asking for help they start flashing radios and boot images (usually mismatched) , custom roms, or flashing back to stock (often with the wrong image) and eventually wind up with a huge cluster f*ck of a mess... Sometimes even hard bricked.

Yeah, still a "thing".
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Please post the output of "fastboot getvar all" and mask out your IMEI.
[X Style (Pure) General] Sgt-P1:
as of 2-20-2017 moto x pure 6.0 49.18-4

so far this method worked, now mine can be that 1 chance that it worked, im on t mobile and having wifi work with current

twrp 3.02

su 2.78

6.0 xt1575
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
Not sure what you're trying to say... This method should never mess with WiFi, the only methods that do use a pre-patched boot.img, very old method.
[X Style (Pure) General] alfi07:
Im sorry. but can't find the = key ?

Thanks in advanced
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
In the symbols or numbers area I think, sorry, I'm on the road and don't have a bootloader unlocked device with me to fire up TWRP and look for sure, but I don't remember having trouble finding it.
[X Style (Pure) General] alfi07:
Hello!

Is there a way to do this with adb?

Thanks
[X Style (Pure) General] jason2678:
Yes. With your phone booted into TWRP connect it via USB and enter this on the computer:

adb shell

You'll see the terminal window change, and now commands are actually running on the phone's shell instead of the local computer. Now you can enter that SYSTEMLESS=true command from the OP with a real keyboard, or just copy/paste it right in.

Side note, I rooted a clean install of the the May security update yesterday by flashing Magisk 11.1. No need to mess with the terminal command to force systemless install that way. Just flash the Magisk zip in TWRP, then install Magisk manager from the Play Store. As an added bonus after enabling Magisk hide and a reboot it passed Safety Net.
[X Style (Pure) General] Jonathanlc2005:
i have a question for you....

your post is quoted as SR4-SuperSU-v2.78-SR4-20161115184928.zip but the link you gave gives this:

Download

SR3-SuperSU-v2.79-SR3-20170114223742.zip

is there a typo or is this the wrong file
[X Style (Pure) General] acejavelin:
The link takes you to the current release... Unless noted that's what you want.
[X Style (Pure) General] Jonathanlc2005:
Don't worry about it. I did get root working
[X Style (Pure) General] ResistanceIsFutile:
Please Clarify

Maybe something has been changed up to what was - is now not - for proper linking. [ I read a lot and am thinking that I read that "BETA" was going to be known as SR = service release now, dropping beta altogether for file names ] though I'm not finding this info. to be written anywhere now. But thinking it was on Chainfire own site.

I to ask because of your Prerequisites notation.

#3-NOTE: Unless otherwise stated, do not use a beta version for rooting Moto devices. SuperSU versions with even numbers are stable versions, while odd numbered versions are beta editions.

[MENTION=572191]Jonathanlc2005[/MENTION] notes the current SR3-SuperSU-v2.79-SR3-20170114223742.zip

which the link you use in the guide points to - this is an odd number and using the Beta and Latest links below, that I've given from a closed Thread, does give the same file.

Not a stable file as you warn to use. . .

[closed thread - https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1538053]

TWRP / FlashFire installable ZIP:

Stable: http://download.chainfire.eu/supersu-stable

Beta: http://download.chainfire.eu/supersu-beta

Latest: http://download.chainfire.eu/supersu

So should it be NOW to use this link (BELOW) for even-numbered stable builds?

Stable releases have moved to the new thread here:

http://xdaforums.com/apps...lease-t3452703

Only trying to offer help and links for you to check info. used and needed to help people along here in a quest for ROOT. :)
[X Style (Pure) General] PassatSport15:
Just bought my Pure Edition from B&H Photo 2 weeks ago. Flashed without no issues.

Moto Pure XT1575 version 6.0 unlocked on Sprint

Unlocked boot loader, flashed TWRP 3.1

Went to recovery mode and installed SuperSU, nothing else - Thanks!

Now just need to get my native tethering to work and I will be all set!

Sent from my Portable