yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rohan164:
bro u need to flash once. Not required on every update.

---------- Post added at 12:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 PM ----------

VOTE HERE

https://plus.google.com/101148793055060187314/posts/ecSMGJvet2B

---------- Post added at 12:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:25 PM ----------

VOTE HERE

https://plus.google.com/101148793055060187314/posts/ecSMGJvet2B
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] pravinn:
I tried this SU zip, flashed via recovery but it failed.

And for next update, built-in root is good option. ?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] yoahmad1995:
Does adoptable storage feature works here?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] aa20162016:
Can I use the AICP boot.img in RR to fix the GPS,too?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
I think that it is clear that people want baked-in root(me too) because i saw the poll resullts and people who want baked-in root clearly outnumber those who don't want it
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rohan164:
flash systemless root magisk. it works well.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ntvampire:
no

yes. but it's wrong thread for this question)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Does adoptable storage function means making SD card internal storage?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ntvampire:
yes (makes SD Card a part of single internal storage, as i know)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
I think it may work if we change file system of SD card to ext4 and then try to make it internal storage by going in settings, can or has anyone tried?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] aa20162016:
Sorry for that.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
2. Not bake

Unless you can get n7100 as an official build. Then you could release baked version with other added features, and other users could use official builds
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] SergiX44:
2. Not bake, for those need root, it's a simple super fast flash (the zip it's less than 600Kb).
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rohan164:
[MENTION=3491794]stunned[/MENTION] [MENTION=5354070]SergiX44[/MENTION]

request you too votes on below link. tnx

https://plus.google.com/101148793055...ts/ecSMGJvet2B
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ntvampire:
link in this post is broken.

https://plus.google.com/101148793055060187314/posts/ecSMGJvet2B - poll is here

and i can say that "Bake Root in ROM" winning for now)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] @richardnote2:
Hello any updates?? What is the difference beween baked root and not
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rohan164:
Bake root is nothing but adding root is rom as it was previously there.

No bake root is no root in ROM. we need to flash SU zip file or magisk.

---------- Post added at 04:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:58 PM ----------

Thats very Sad.:(
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] @richardnote2:
Which one is safe?? And why every one or someone wants no baked root
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Guys

I always prefer the Rom to be clean without root

Why need root when after flashing the Rom you can flash a small file that enables root?

This way both parties win...

But if root is baked, those who need Rom without root won't enjoy it...

Think guys before making a choice
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] @richardnote2:
. Why this rom should not be rooted?? Is it dangerous? Or this no baked root likes an official update?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rohan164:
+1 brother. pls vote on google plus voting link
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Voted

---------- Post added at 12:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 PM ----------

No but some apps like Pokemon go will not work if root is baked....

It's not dangerous...But as I said above...

It will be a very good move if root is not baked
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] yoahmad1995:
It works in s3 without changing anything and it has same as our cpu.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] @richardnote2:
Everyone. What rom are you in or version of this rom? And what should be gapps flashed? Micro. Mini? Or what
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ntvampire:
current su zip on lineage site give error flashing on our device. that's why for now i choosed baked root. i don't want to flash magick (and install after it superuser app from google play), don't want to flash systemless supersu, i did it now on 20/01 version (i tested all 2 variants) and i don't like it (dissapointed). baked root is simple and well integrated. if su zip from lineage site will be correctly flashed - i will choose not bake root in ROM
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Version is 0120

and preferred is open gapps pico(preferred by me)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] newxdabie:
Thank you for your effort!!!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Yudh:
[MENTION=539770]tilaksidduram[/MENTION] [MENTION=6311143]Trafalgar Square[/MENTION] [MENTION=7049132]hibin.m[/MENTION]

http://www.xda-developers.com/android-7-0-compatibility-document-released-plenty-of-changes-in-tow/

Read it it may Help

https://github.com/opengapps/opengapps/wiki/Notes-for-Android-7.0

This patch is for both 7.1 and 7.0.

✌
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] tilaksidduram:
Thanks for sharing the 7.0 doc link.

I already have the webview providers overlay added into my sources. So it's covered.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] chinabhz:
I installed the package but it does not open, now I will have to flash the rom again to get the dialer back on the phone ...
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] digital0:
How did you install it? It's working for me and lots of others, I don't see why should it not work for you.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] chinabhz:
I copied the dialer.apk file using the root browser and pasted it into the indicated folder!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] digital0:
So copy your saved apk back, or flash the ROM again. Or try the method which I wrote, because most probably permissions are bad when you used root browser.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] chinabhz:
I did not back up the original app (ok, you can call me dumb). I will re-install the rom.

EDIT: The problem was permission in the Dialer.apk file. I set it to match the others (-rw-r-r) and it worked now. Thank you!!!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] MCT_:
Manual changes Dialer.apk, it is a violation of the integrity of the system.

Perhaps high energy consumption.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] blackbug007:
Thanks for your efforts!

I installed it today and its working pretty well.

I have a issue though when I make a call either from dialer or whatsapp. The screen goes blank and everything is hung.

I can talk but cannot see the screen until the other person ends the call or i restart.

I saw a previous post with a dialer.apk. Is it a fix for this? or there is any other solution.

Thanks.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] digital0:
Yes, it is a fix for it (dialer). For whatsapp you have to configure it (if possible) to not use proximity sensor.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] rocksia:
rotation cannot working
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] yamenaljabi:
Please.. can we falsh this room without bugs and if there is any problems can anyone tell me what it is?? Thanks..
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Trafalgar Square:
Check the list in the first post.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] chinabhz:
I've been using this build since the first. I have had some bugs already reported by other users, however I have to say that my old N7100 is much faster with this rom than with the others I was using (CM-13 and Ressurection).

Congratulations to the developer [MENTION=539770]tilaksidduram[/MENTION] and when he can launch a new build with the main bugs fixed we will all be grateful!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] xjrc:
I Agree, the phone is much faster, even though the rom has some bugs, I prefer to use this one because of the performance, great work!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] blackbug007:
Thanks for replying. How can I disable the proximity sensor? I looked around but didnt find any straight solution for it.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] digital0:
I you mean whatsapp, I don't know. I specifically wrote "if possible".
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] zaid1997:
I have tried alot of rom for n7100 and now Iam using cm13 andrid 6.0.1 by traflgar-square and it has no bugs expect some force stop in sitting but if the developer [MENTION=539770]tilaksidduram[/MENTION] fix all the main bugs that present in the first post i will really move to this rom
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] tilaksidduram:
Don't worry most the bugs mentioned in the OP is fixed in the new update coming today.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
Official doesn't have baked root. If you bake in root, many apps like banking, pay and video apps don't work because they check for root things.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
And if we disable root,will pay not work then also?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
If we disable root

Many more apps will have compactable

Including android pay
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
But pay also detects custom roms
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ntvampire:
good question!) if disable root in developers settings in rom, then restart - does any banking app or pokemon go see the root? does anyone tested it?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Then pay not possible

But trust me

A Rom with no root is way better

---------- Post added at 01:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:06 PM ----------

Yes

(I haven't tried in this version ...But yes in previous versions)

They do detect root
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
I read somewhere that if we disable root and have stable version of cyanogenmod (now lineage OS) and not nightlies, pay will work

Edit-also has anyone tried disabling root and rebooting and then playing Pokemon go, also has anyone tried the same thing with adding another step that is clear data and FS for Pokemon go and other banking apps
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ntvampire:
i think we will never get stable version of lineage OS) exactly as cm13 & cm12 etc
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Yeah maybe ??
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] trashgremlin:
Banking apps can detect custom rom, even you haven`t got root and stop working. But with root you can use different tools to stop alarm activities and get working app
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] h_maharaj:
The SU add-on zip fails to install, giving a signal:4 error.

For the next update, I'm fine with root not baked in (as this can satisfy everyone) provided that the SU add-on works properly.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] ntvampire:
yes) i also think - right decision is that we must wait for next rootless build & test lineage zips on it, and after that we can vote in poll correctly :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] logosA:
Guys I have some things to ask, if any one nows for sure please tell me:

1. If we are rooted with that SU provided by Lineage, will Delta updates work?

2. Dirty flashing of the rom for , ex to remove a mod or theme engine not working, will that remove SU and ROOT access and had to be flashed again?

3. Could be possible in releases to be released two (2) versions of the rom (rooted and unrooted) so we could choose? or it is to much trouble?

4. Wiil be Peace in the world in sometime soon? :)

if anyone can answer that, Thanks in advance :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] smeagol1975:
:D:laugh::laugh::laugh:, I think that´s not possible. :(.

I preffer rooted Rom. ;)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] reis1996:
All touchwiz(stock or custom) must be primary ROM. Yes tilaks lineage works as secondary
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stassu:
Root

1! IMHO, it ought to be prerooted.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] reis1996:
FOR THOSE WHO VOTED FOR OPTION 1.

ARE YOU GUYS SNAPCHAT USERS!!!!????

if yes I hope you know that with future updates of Snapchat you won't be able to log in even if root is disabled!!!!!

Think twice before voting for baked in root???

With magisk hide you can hide root from Snapchat so wake up guys!!!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
I was suggesting the same thing, one version with root and one with not
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] reis1996:
Yes it does!!!! As our SELINUX is still permissive????

---------- Post added at 03:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 PM ----------

I have tried this

Doesn't work if root or magisk is installed

Tried a lot of work arounds

Works only if root is not there on this ROM I.e. clean 20/01 update

Once again Mr tilak please do NOT bake root
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
As i have been saying, please try unrooting with kingroot method, please go back to 0116 and try deleting root access with king root and then try if Pokemon go works. Because this may solve all this problem
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
Root would work same way as gapps, flash once. Delta updates would work (probably) and no need to reflash when doing dirty flash.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] reis1996:
Answer to 2:

I use magisk 10.2

It modifies the boot.IMG to give me root as su of magisk is in built in 10.2 version

However some forms of root do not edit the boot.IMG

If you use magisk and then dirty flash you are restoring the boot.IMG to its original thereby loosing root

---------- Post added at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 PM ----------

I WANT ROOT!!!!!

BUT Snapchat shouldn't detect it otherwise I frequently get banned ( photos/videos don't get sent )

That's why I use magisk
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
You can unroot the rom and then install magisk.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stassu:
Root

Rootless=stock rom, but that is custom rom, and there are much more apps, to have root. And, as soon, as it is custom rom, for what all workaronds, when it may have root from the box? I WANT ROOT!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Gurkanwal Chauhan:
No root is cool... Easily using root with a single flash of super su zip.... What more?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
:laugh:

Thats the SPIRIT:good::good:
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
If user is unable to flash one zip to gain Root, it is much more safer for him that there is no root out of the box. because clearly he has no idea what he is doing.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
The thing is not about flashing zips but the thing is that inbuilt root is inbuilt and can't be compared to root with third party roots, i updated to 0120 version but was not satisfied with chain fire root. And how will i disable root of i want to? And the add on zips are not even working for now for us
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
The official su flashable from Lineage is exactly same thing as inbuilt. It is not 3rd party.

Of course things must be fixed first to get it work, but "inbuilt = no root+flash su zip"
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
I meant chain fire from the word third party
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
We are not talking about chainfire. Discussion is about to put Lineage provided su to rom inbuilt or to flash lineage su zip. End result is identical.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Will that zip act exactly like inbuilt root
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
Yes. It is the same thing.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Ok so let's wait till it starts working, then we will see
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] logosA:
Do you want to make a different conversation about the bigger picture here and not just the root or unrooted devises?

i was reading in some posts and articles around. As it shows the next step that Google will do is to

stop access to rooted phones to Play store

!!

Claming that security is what is making them to prefer unrooted phones, as they are more secure than the others which are rooted.

This is what is hiding behind that choice of Lineage to remove Root by default in their official Roms, knowing what is going to happen. This moment , more than 150.000 installations are been made by official Lineage Roms. (multiple thousands more are still in CM)

Until now CM and now Lineage was the main alternative for free and Rooted phones, AGAINST the phone companies. That doesnt just mean that if you have a rooted device , you will not have access to playstore. Developers of APPS which need root to work ( the best of the apps as we know) , will not have place in Play store, since phones that have access to it, could not be able to use them . Is this the end of free and custom ROMS?

All these apps and developers are going to be left without home and infrastructure to work with.

Only platforms like XDA labs and the others alternatives , you know which, could be helping them (and us) have access to them, as we maybe have ROOTED phones. Will that be enough?

So think twice when you vote for Root or UNRooted devices, just to play a game or use a specific APP.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
What is your source, I haven't seen any that would suggest that. Only new thing is that Play store now shows if your device is certified by Google. Most likely just to inform people if their phone i real or if it is tampered/fake.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Alekbrt:
You can use amazon underground, legit and have almost the same feeling, minus all the spy****bloatware google enforces.

With microg combined with future xposed, Fdroid and all kinds of other Apkmirror(s), it's not going to change much.

My vote : keep it baked UNTIL Lineage SU starts working properly. After that, remove it.

Makes everybody happy.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
So I guess all of us can agree to this

Root stays baked until lineage's root zip starts working

After that.....Remove it......
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] logosA:
One month ago , did you even suspect that they would decide to remove Root?

DONT shot the messenger, read the message
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
You are wrong, Google didn't remove root, Google has nothing to do with Lineage.

Please stop spreading lies and unfounded speculation.

Peace :)
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] andrewKode:
I don't know why you guys complain so much about root... I mean back in the days I only used to root phones because I wanted to change the ROM. I'm using now AOSP MM and I don't even have it rooted, I don't use root at all.

The focus ahould be lead to other matters, like when will LineageOS Official be a real thing for N7100 and N7105.

We know N7105 got support from CyanogenMod back then so it won't be a surprise to see it on the Lineage list, but what about N7100!? Will Tilak actually be able to make it possible after all? Can the lineage kernel actually work on it?

Don't worry about root, there are people who do that and have the power to change things.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] eng_alshami:
so guys ... which rom you prefer ? 20/1/2017 or 16/1/2017?

I don't care about root if all features works fine :)

i need the one more stable without lags

tip: after installing last one ... rightness bar wont be hide ?

thank you in advance
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Well then it probably ends the matter, root will be baked in till lineage's zip start working.

---------- Post added at 06:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:44 PM ----------

I searched about play store and root but i couldn't find even one thing related to what [MENTION=5554397]logosA[/MENTION] is saying, logosA, can you provide the link of where you read it?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] marchnz:
Try them and report your findings.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] logosA:
I will stop talking about that , as it seems it causes more problems than making things better , as was my intention was to.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Ok
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] reis1996:
You can also flash required files and root the ROM?

---------- Post added at 07:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:12 PM ----------

Pokemon go works on 20/01 update

Meaning it does NOT detect that we are on custom ROM

Bringing root in will!
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Well that reply is what i was waiting for, if i install magisk or any other third party root, it would not be same as inbuilt root, that is a different thing that if add on by lineage OS starts to work. But if you unroot the ROM by that method, it will be exactly like you want, clean and without root, then you can do whatever you want to do.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] reis1996:
How does that matter ?? As in I want to know what are the major affects of using 3rd party apps to root
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
There is not a complete defination for that, it's just that inbuilt is inbuilt is inbuilt and can't be compared to third parties' root, also you can disable it as per your convenience, and maybe it's more reliable:p
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] reis1996:
You mean you don't know the answer and assume that inbuilt is some how better.

You could be right but don't give an assumption if you don't know the answer
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Yeah, i think it's more convenient
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] reis1996:
Exactly!!!!!!!!

Tilak asked us to tell him to bake root or not!!!! Period!!

Not come up with weird assumptions and fool noobs in the process to vote for baking
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] Stud12376:
Well lets just end this discussion and let votes and tilak decide what to do.
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] eng_alshami:
here is my test

1- when finishing flashing .. you must enter an account, and no way to avoid that.

2- brightness slider disable doesn't works ever, it always shown in QS even if it disabled.

3- there is no clear all button in recent menu, huh no it appears when sliding down all recents

4- buttons light is not accurate ... try set it to 1 sec and see

5- is there a memory bar in recent menu or it is in resurrection remix only?

still testing
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] tobias231h:
Netflix and SoDelicious video playback isn't working.

Will it be fixed in the following builds?

Logs Attached
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] 4rz0:
After quite a while with my S5 I resurrected my Note 2 again and installed LineageOS.

How comes it's so much different from the S5 version?
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] stunned:
Broken since cm13
[Galaxy Note II Original Android Development] nNeFeroN:
I can't understand what is problem with this root ? Why u R making so much problems from this situation. U R able to get root whenever u want just by flashing one small zip . Or u R so lazy that u can't spent 2~5 minutes of your life to flash this zip via recovery ?