yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Texas_Ace:
EDIT: long story short, several small issues came together to create a big issue.

The fix ended up being a bad copy from my computer to the phone, not once, not twice but 3 separate times and using Odin 3.10 to flash the stock rom instead of 3.12.5.

I ended up having to pull the SD card out and write directly to it with an SD card reader to get a correctly hashed file on the card.

I now have the SPR flashed with 10/25, will see how it goes from here. Sorry to waste peoples time.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Ibuprophen:
I just wanted to bring this to the attention of the members that the following applies to...

On 25-Oct-2017, the LineageOS for the "kltespr" (GS5 for Sprint devices) was unified with the "kltedv" (Unbranded GS5 for Australia and a few others).

So as of now, the KLTEDV is for both the SM-G900I & SM-G900P as a unified development for LineageOS.

If you go to the following link, you'll see (towards the bottom) that the "Supported models" will reflect this too.

https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/kltedv

Just an FYI in case you weren't aware of this... :)

Thank you very much!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT PROVIDE SUPPORT VIA PM UNLESS ASKED/REQUESTED BY MYSELF.

PLEASE KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] javelinanddart:
I appreciate your awareness, but I wrote a patch to make devices automatically look for kltedv updates in the 10/25 build, which is why kltespr was still built this week (but it won't be from now on). So all of this should happen seamlessly behind the scenes for users.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Ibuprophen:
Understood completely my friend!

I noticed this when I first had seen that each device download page now has some additional links on top for that specific device (which is a great idea).

Then, out of curiosity, i had selected the "device info" (while in the kltespr download page) and it redirected me to the "kltedv". I scrolled to the bottom and saw that it was then unified.

I hope i had explained it okay via text but, that's how I happened upon discovering... "The Secrets Within The Underground of LineageOS"... LMAO!!! :)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT PROVIDE SUPPORT VIA PM UNLESS ASKED/REQUESTED BY MYSELF.

PLEASE KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fitittome:
On a completely separate but related note. I have noticed that there is an S5 variant (k3gxx) labeled Galaxy S5 (International 3G). Its the SM-G900H, different maintainer. Isn't this 'name' asking for trouble?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] javelinanddart:
Not much can be done. The most we can do is mark it "Galaxy S5 (International 3G, Exynos)". The model num and codename is all up to Samsung. We could add "exynos" to the name on the wiki/download page, but that's about it
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fitittome:
More download page improvements.

That would help. I have noticed a few support issues of late where the wrong image has been flashed. I thought there were 'asserts' in place to prevent that, but there must be reasons in certain circumstances. I remember my confusion, long ago, trying to work out which one to download because of the carrier in the name.

Anyway, the new download page is certainly an improvement. I wonder if the actual model number could be pulled in too? See attached mock-up screenshot. That in conjunction with the 'exynos' name change would greatly help the first time users.

PS. sorry a bit off topic.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] david825234:
[MENTION=2693412]haggertk[/MENTION] any way I can get mms to work from virgin mobile? I've tried changing the apns-config.xml file, settings it in the apn (though, it never saves), and using the virgin mobile apn fix but that doesn't have the right mms proxy or port.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] :
I'm not on virgin mobile, but I did have a look at the flashable zip / virgin mobile apn fix, that you mentioned. have you tried editing the apns-config.xml contained in that .zip file and then flashing it?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] david825234:
Yes, I've changed the mms server and port and nothing. Even on a fresh install :( I'm going to try more things. I'll post any progress
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] SB4BBs:
Did you try or check you smsc via *#*#4636#*#* if you get an error search online for smsc codes for you carrier. I had this issue before try it if it works. It took care for sms for me but as for apns, I think it's cm bug. I had this problem since cm13. I guess it's a problem for certain S5 variant.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] albinoman887:
Nice work OP! :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] david825234:
Got some interesting progress on my mms situation. I can now send mms through textra without having to set the apn to manual (with manual on, it now shows what it should've been unlike before) but I still can't send mms through the stock app, nor google messenger.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Jaanto:
Hey, welcome back albinoman! Are you gonna get on board with 14.1 as well?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] skxaid:
can i install this rom on g900h
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Jaanto:
Is it a feature or a bug, CyanogenMod exclusive or all Android Roms since 5.0, that the notifications in in the pull down menu keep switching around when you check them?

I believe the system does it to prioritize what it 'thinks' is important for you to notice, but most of the times I just find myself annoyed by its constant and seemingly random switching around.

For example, I want to tap on a mail notification. But just as I'm about to tap it, it switches around with another notification, let's say a calendar item, which makes me tap on that item. This in turn makes me enter the calendar app and makes the notification disappear from my notifications, which I find a major inconvenience.

My question is probably off topic, but I'm hoping to gain some insight in this, as I feel I'm not the only one being annoyed by it.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] kenedielh:
For snapdragon only
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] mukdiwalaazim:
I am facing problem in accessing file manager and other apps as it stuck on permission screen I need to manually give permission. any solution for this??
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ddjr:
Is there a kernel we need to flash, or is it included on the rom?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] :
The kernel is in the rom, as would normally be the case in any rom.

I know a few people have posted that they have flashed other kernels, but personally I wouldn't recommend doing that. The klte kernel for cm-14.1 has some extra security features that are mandated for Nougat and these other kernels may not have it. Also, adding a different kernel sort of puts you in a position where you may end up introducing bugs that aren't in Haggertk's builds ~ Obviously, you would be on your own if you happened to run into such problems/specific bugs.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] AddictedToB3er:
I think everyone should take this stance especially on an alpha build where bugs are trying to be ironed out. Obviously you can do whatever you want with your phone but please do not report bugs if your on a custom kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] RemusW:
nine7nine you mention 'Reworking the standard theme (Replacing Teal/green with Cyan/blue)' in your signature. would it be possible at sometime to have that in this rom.

or is that something that is planned to be introduced into CM roms in general as kind of a personalization signature of CM roms ?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] :
+1 ;) Ya, the kernel is a pretty critical part and as mentioned on the first page/FAQ;

i just thought I would reiterate that point, as I have seen a few comments on people flashing custom kernels! ... Myself, I do use a custom kernel and customized spin of cm-14.1, * but I also don't report bugs on them, if they may be specific to my rom. *** Instead, I will flash Haggertk's build to verify, then consider reporting...

For now, I am just hacking on the default theme, because I can't stand all of the green. ;) It _could_ be something that I submit into CM, in the future. However, It is slightly incomplete for now and definitely not something that would be added to Haggertk's builds. (the cyan/blue stuff would be appropriate for CM, if they were interested, when it is ready.)

I mention it being incomplete; this is largely due to certain apps (mainly settings app and some of it's external pages) that are hardcoding color values rather than sourcing these colors from the default theme. Some of this seems like it is slowly being fixed upstream, while other bits haven't been and it is unclear to me if there are specific reasons that they have been hardcoded (?).... Because of this, I end up having to go through and fix this throughout the code and while I _mostly_ have it fixed, there are still some annoying bits left to do. (the hardcoded color stuff would need to be fixed in AOSP, not CM).

NOTE: I may publish my custom cm14.x romm too, at some point. But not until nightlies are available and all of the kinks have been worked out... I don't suffer from any bugs due to any of my changes to cm14, but obviously cm14 is ready for primetime yet ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] RemusW:
i too hate the default green theme and would prefer the cyan blue to replace it. changing the theme colour could be a neat indicator that it's a CM rom that would separate it from other AOSP roms. It seems strange that Google introduces a theme system then continue hard coding colours into the apps instead of following the roms theme settings.

Thank you for taking the time to reply to my question.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] :
Well, It seems that CM is working on changing some of the default theming, they just haven't touch any of the code that I have (yet?!). ie: icon colors, toolbars/headers colors, graphs, etc... I also do some other non-theme related hacking on CM; such as changing some of the animations, changing the toasts && getting rid of the 64pixel spacing on toasts ~> that is really there for devices that have a navbar (which klte doesn't) and some other stuff.... basically, anything that annoys me, or that I think looks stupid. lol ;)

No, problem. :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fatkpirok:
Hi,

I have SM-G900F and I can confirm it works great. I miss just e-mail, with the same configuration as in the original 601.

Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] lickwid:
Just flashed this on my Vzw Galaxy S5 and it's running pretty smoothly. It may be a MM or Nougat thing, bit is there any way to make the default storage for the camera to be the external SD card?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] javelinanddart:
haggertk is working on showing the model numbers for all of the klte models.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fitittome:
I had a look at the permissions and groups, they all look consistent (root mainly). One thing I did notice is that /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq is populated with these:-

affected_cpus

cpu_load

cpu_utilization

cpuinfo_cur_freq

cpuinfo_max_freq

cpuinfo_min_freq

cpuinfo_transition_latency

related_cpus

scaling_available_frequencies

scaling_available_governors

scaling_cur_freq

scaling_driver

scaling_governor

scaling_max_freq

scaling_min_freq

scaling_setspeed

stats

Whilst cpufreq is not defined for these cpus:-

/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq

/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq

/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq

Again, I don't know if this is right or not, just wandering down the tree. When I load Kernel Adiutor that list in cpufreq seems to get populated for cpu3 only and does not appear to be removed when it Kernel Adiutor exits.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] sarxes:
I know the search engine is my friend, and I should review a couple of pages but 500+ pages to read back it's kinda difficult.

My simple question is that at the moment the rom is in "stable" state?

I would need for google maps(gps), bluetooth, camera, calling, gaming, social media. For nothing "tricky" just for daily bases use. Should I move from CM 13 2016/12/13 ?

If you could answer me lads I would be happy.

Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] phalkon30:
Simple answer, yes absolutely. All memory issues in recent posts are taken care of, and on my wifi only S5 I can get 10 days of idle time on a single charge. It's about as good as it gets for now.

Of course, each week there are bound to be issues as the code base changes, but they're fixed very quickly
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
I remember that you've written about the subject before. I would also be interested to know if this is "normal". Although I don't have any problems with CPU frequencies and hotplugs. However, I use the tuned Boeffla Kernel from [MENTION=516058]fbs[/MENTION] and set the hotplug profile to "optimized" and multicore powersaving to "on". Then there won't be any problems.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Ibuprophen:
If [MENTION=5795145]javelinanddart[/MENTION] can confirm or clarify this...

The LineageOS Nightly builds may not be perfect but, has a track record of being much more stable than the CyanogenMod Nightly builds.

Though, I'm not completely sure (i can only assume) that, based upon the continued use of the "Nightly" and "Experimental" labels for the LineageOS releases, i believe that since Lineage has only been officially launched for approximately 9 months, it is probably still too early to release a "Snapshot" stable build.

This is only my personal conclusion based on what I've seen and experienced and though I'm confident in my conclusion, i may be wrong in part or in whole.

The old CyanogenMod Wiki used to have a type of outline/description for their build labels used and since the Lineage Wiki doesn't have this (as of yet), it just leaves it up to interpretation based upon what's out there.

But, I'm not one to gossip so you didn't hear this from me... LMAO!!! :)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT PROVIDE SUPPORT VIA PM UNLESS ASKED/REQUESTED BY MYSELF.

PLEASE KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jdrch:
It's been sufficiently stable for those purposes since LOS 14.1 builds 1st started.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fitittome:
I think I am wrong to witter on about it here, I think it's a bug in KA. But the bug only surfaces in our situation. I will track down the KA forum and run it up the flagpole there. :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] revjamescarver:
Did my own build the other day and noticed that lineage had their own recovery image, is there any advantage in installing that, and another question, how does one ad or change some of the apps that are in lineage?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] chucky2:
I have an AT&T S5 Active, had a couple questions:

1.) Will the Active work with this ROM?

2.) I use the Mobile Hotspot app/feature to enable a WiFi hotspot where I can work on my notebook from anywhere. I think this app is provided by AT&T on their phones that support this (although it's not labeled and AT&T app), so I'm wondering is there a replacement for this available?

Regardless if I can use this or not, nice work and thanks for supporting the community!

Chuck
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fitittome:
No not here. Check LOS wiki for SM-G870A or unofficial support elsewhere on XDA.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Ibuprophen:
I don't see anything on the LineageOS Wiki the AT&T GS5 Active SM-G870A (klteattactive).

The following link is to the LineageOS Wiki Page:

https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/

This doesn't mean that it's a definite thing that this device will/will not ever get an Official LineageOS release. This is up to the Lineage development team (as ultimately determined by the Lineage "Head Developers").

As far as an Unofficial LineageOS... That remains to be seen. Someone could be working on it now and isn't ready to be released.

You have only 2 options for this...

1) Be the Hero amongst the members with the same device as yours and develop one.

2) Be patient. You never know... One could be released tomorrow. :)

I really do wish you the best of luck!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT PROVIDE SUPPORT VIA PM UNLESS ASKED/REQUESTED BY MYSELF.

PLEASE KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] yoshkapundrick:
Finally Samsung will be unlocking the bootloader on the s5 AT&T(and other affected carriers). Will this rom work?

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3kvdv9/samsung-upcycling-galaxy-s5-bitcoin-mining-rig
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] haggertk:
If unlocks truly do come it will likely work. We would need positive feedback before making G900A an officially supported device.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] systemcrash:
So while the 8.0 bringup is progressing, 8.1 is already around the corner :P
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
... and fragmentation is moving on ...
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Blackburn119:
true story tbh, Google still wasting their money on a **it hardware like pixel 2 XL while their software OS still has plenty of bugs like bad ram management, gapps battery drain...
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] txordi:
I think they had enough money to overcome both XD
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bluefreak1988:
Deleted
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Texas_Ace:
Is there a way to toggle GPS from the notification drawer like my older CM phones had? I prefer to just leave it off unless I need it as I only use it once every few weeks generally.

Plus I find it creepy for the GPS to have a constant lock.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HulkSmashBurgers:
The tile is called Location. Tap the pen icon in the notification drawer and add the Location tile. Tap the tile and then tap the toggle in the upper right to enable/disable location.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Texas_Ace:
I feel dumb now, I never even noticed the pen, I kept looking in the settings for that. Still catching up from my CM11 kitkat phone.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] HulkSmashBurgers:
Took me forever to notice it. Also, there's an annoying bug in Android source (not LOS fault, but I wish they could fix it). If you try to drag a tile up from a couple rows down, it won't let you do it, it will let go. You have to add a bunch of tiles before the one you want first, then remove the ones you don't want.

Anyone know if this has been fixed in 8.0/8.1?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
I understand you very well! I also came from an S3 with CM11 some month ago. It's really hard to get used to 14.1. Personally, I still find KitKat to be much more user-friendly than Nougat. In my view, the handling is clearly a deterioration.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Texas_Ace:
Well good to know I was not alone!

I am still reserved on 7.1 myself. There are things I like and things I don't. Overall I think most of what I don't like is simply not being used to it. As I adjust I think it will be ok. Although the having to grant write access to the SD card for every app and if you miss it the first time the only fix being a complete reinstall of android is downright stupid.

Does anyone know how to re-grant permission if you missed it the first time?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] godofsalt:
The only way that I have found was Magisk v14.0 stable build (Can only be installed throught the Recovery). After Rebooting, install the app Magisk Manger, (the app that controls Magisk, think you reboot again ) Now you can add the actual scripts/files right through the Manger (the scripts will only be active after a Reboot). At present time "Extsd access for Nougat" is the one you want. (In the Manager you will only download/install the latest scripts)

Seems like a lot but only way I have found to be able to actually use the SD card without make it adaptable....

Guess in short, I should have sent you to the Magisk thread on XDA....

Hope this helps you a bit
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Texas_Ace:
I already have Magisk installed and working. So there is a magisk module to allow write permissions in 7.1?

Got a link to it? Have you tried it? I will take a look at the magisk thread.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
Normally you should be able to change permissions in Settings -> Apps -> [choose app] -> Permissions
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Ibuprophen:
To be honest, this thread is specific to the LineageOS ROM itself and discussions regarding Magisk should really be asked/posted within appropriate Magisk thread.

Here's just a quick helper for you to locate some Magisk support and guidance...

The following area of the forum is dedicated specifically for "Magisk".

https://xdaforums.com/apps/magisk

The following is a Magisk Module called "SD Write Access Enabler v1". I can't guarantee that this will work but, seems to be a very active thread.

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3503988

The following thread is for Magisk General Support/Discussions.

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3432382

Just to clarify, I'm not in a position to tell anyone what to do or where to go. I'm just providing a personal opinion/suggestion to, hopefully, help you obtain a solution to your issue.

I wish you the best of luck! :)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT PROVIDE SUPPORT VIA PM UNLESS ASKED/REQUESTED BY MYSELF.

PLEASE KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
I would follow this recommendation, because discussions about Magisk, SuperSU, Xposed and similar things are very much disliked here - to express it nicely. ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Ibuprophen:
Just as expressed here...

Thank you very much for your clarification. :)

Let's please get back to the LineageOS business at hand. :cool:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT PROVIDE SUPPORT VIA PM UNLESS ASKED/REQUESTED BY MYSELF.

PLEASE KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fipsy:
I just wanted to support your opinion and thank you for your suggestions.

Perhaps this digression can be interpreted as a sign of LineageOS 14.1 running so well at the moment that there are no other topics. Laugh! :silly:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Ibuprophen:
Let's keep our fingers crossed for the next Security Patch then.

It's a sort of expectation almost every time one has been implemented... LMAO!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I DO NOT PROVIDE SUPPORT VIA PM UNLESS ASKED/REQUESTED BY MYSELF.

PLEASE KEEP IT IN THE THREADS WHERE EVERYONE CAN SHARE
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] systemcrash:
[MENTION=5795145]javelinanddart[/MENTION] - nice work on the RIL stuff. I thought your G900 was toast and you stopped developing for it - what happened - you get a new one? Did you *miss* it, or us? :D
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] fitittome:
RTC Alarm

I saw this:- RTC Alarm with phone switched off and felt quite jealous! Has this ever worked on klte?

---------- Post added at 11:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:28 AM ----------

I have never seen so much activity! I guess they are moving the Radio gubbins to an open implementation so that it can be better supported. Not sure. I will be much appreciated, I'm sure.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] javelinanddart:
I got a new one

The radio changes have been moving towards an OSS Implementation because it's necessary for O (and I explained that here, https://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=74278203&postcount=8936, and haggertk has already addressed that in the O thread)

Regarding RTC alarm: I'll look into getting that working, if it isn't already.