yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Varcetta2:
Any possibility to undervolt this kernel?

Gesendet von meinem SM-N920F mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Kraken99:
Can I flash Ram Kernel v4 after flashing RamRom v4? And do I need to install SuperSu seperately? I'm using N910G with DPB1. Thanks
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] @ Ayush Garg:
Yes
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] guruguido:
Anytime you flash a new kernel, you need to reflash SuperSU or else you loose root.

---------- Post added at 07:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:32 PM ----------

It's not the kernel.

I know this for a fact, cause i had the exact same issue, let me guess... you're using 910T or 910W8.

Flash datafix zip file, thank me later :)
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] guruguido:
I'd flash the kernel then SuperSU in that order then reboot.

You're good to go :)

I prefer SR5-SuperSU-v2.78-SR5-20161130091551.zip file

Update:

I wasn't paying attention, but you mentioned 2.79, which is available, and is Official.

I have it installed on my Note 4 now, it's stable.

See image below
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] rfresh:
Can I use this kernel on cm14.1 ROM?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
Might be a silly question. Are cpu governors and speed tweaks kernel related or rom related?

I am using ram kernel v4 and supersu 2.79. On a note 7 ported rom for my n910t. I'm curious what are suggested cpu tweaks, but wondering if that question is more appropriate in the kernel thread or the rom thread?

Thanks (sorry if this is a stupid question)

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
It is related to kernel

About CPU tweaks, I am not interested.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
I was just trying to figure out if changing governors would increase battery life without sacrificing performance.... For the record I think your kernels have outperformed the others I've tried.... But thought I'd ask. (meant no offense whatsoever. I'm a huge fan)

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] milesian:
SafetyNet woes

Were you able to eventually get past SafetyNet? Like you, I was also not successful with v4, and I've tried all the builds I could find in this thread dating back to the earlier v3 version that's shown in your screenshot, but none were able to pass SafetyNet. In fact, even without root, none of the v3 or v4 builds were able to pass SafetyNet.

Any luck passing SafetyNet with your setup? My v4 setup is precisely the same as yours, but even with Magisk Hide successfully enabled, I'm not able to pass Safetynet.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] gunz.jones:
I haven't tried anything other than pogo. My credit and banking apps don't seem to have issues or snapchat. Not sure about wallet or pay.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
RamKernel V5 Test 1

Change log

1. Linux updated to 3.10.83

2. Enabled LZ4 compression

I'm in process of updating to V5 so will be giving some incremental test builds for N910F/G, so test and report

Also I have just released my ROM with kernel & data fix for all supported models (N910F/G/T) with selection of model in aroma installer. If you want support for your model for my future ROM then post data fix with permission from author for your model, I'll use RamKernel.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] banzaip:
V5 tested with alxndr 910F rom. All Seem ok. Just have 1 problem : very laggy keyboard, but after wipe cache/art, no problem anymore.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
I hope to see a N910T kernel v5 soon. Best kernel I've used thus far.

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] bols244:
What's new in aurora V5?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Strider72:
You are in the wrong thread, have a nice day.

---------- Post added at 01:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:37 PM ----------

Testing RamKernel V5 in N910F with Norma V11 and found no problems at all!!

Thanks [MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION] for another great kernel version.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ghanaboy:
Please am just asking...can u just add faux or wolfson sound mod to it?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
Yes I'll, which one you prefer. I'm traveling this week so will take some time.

All N910V, N910P, N910W8, N915 people if possible please provide data fix for your devices to use N910G/F ROM on it with permission from author, I want to make universal ROM for these all devices as kernel is already available.

If data fix is not available please mention like that so I'll not keep expectations.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Alphaman10:
N910W8: should also work for N910T

I don't remember the author of file sorry..
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ghanaboy:
Thank you very much.. I prefer FAUX SOUND MOD
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
I don't use the sound mods personally, but that's about as classy as it gets. Somebody requests a feature and the author immediately responds with "will do".... Man that's freakin awesome! [MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION] you are the man.

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Hedi.Karray:
U cant include my device in your rom aroma ? :p
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
Kernel is not ready for your device, once it's done will include it also:good:
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Hedi.Karray:
U can include it while telling that the wifi dont work yet :p

I personally would download it happily :p
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] noob4598:
Hey bud, If you dont mind i would like to ask a question about kernels in general that I can't seem to find the answer to. I don't know alot about how or what makes a kernel what it is or do what it does and I have been struggling trying to build my own but am to the point where I have givin up. Why is it that when I check my root status with root checker that some kernels say that access is "not permitted or restricted" in /sbin? And does it have any effect on the limitations of what can be done with the system. I don't know if it matters but i use Systemmode Su and keep busybox installed. Just a curiosity that has been bugging me. Thanks in advance
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jimydirektsaft:
Hey guys, I made a bad mistake and and hope you can help.

I accidently flashed and booted "RamKernel_N915FY_V4_all" on my n910f (don't ask how this can happen :rolleyes: ).

Now if I boot the

right

kernel for my device, the touchscreen seems to be misconfigured:

if I tap on the screen this is not recognized at the visible position where I placed my finger, it is recognized at a shifted position. The Touchscreen seems to be fully functional but i have to guess where to tap to reach a key on the keyboard for example. Surprisingly this also happens if I boot into TWRP. This behaviour makes the device hardly usable.

A restored backup doesn`t solve this problem.

Could you help me to fix this problem, please?

Currently I use OmniRom with RamKernel_N910F_V4_all.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jimydirektsaft:
Ok guys I found a solution:

dialing *#2663# and updating the touch FW by pressing "TSP FW update (General)" did the trick.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] milesian:
Hey, is there a way to set SELinux to enforcing on this kernel? I've tried using the SELinuxModeChanger app, as well as the su -c 'setenforce 1' command in a terminal app, but neither affects the SELinux status upon a reboot.

This is my last ditch attempt to pass Safety Net on this awesome kernel, so I'd love to hear any and all advice. Thanks much.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
It will not change once it's compiled as permissive, tell me your model number, I'll make enforcing kernel for your model. Mostly it will work even after compiled enforcing but can't say.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] android_htc:
Hey [MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION],

Would be great if you can make an enforcing kernel for N910F.

Thanks for your continued support on this excellent kernel.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] milesian:
That'd be wonderful. Thank you kindly, Ram121, I'm honored. I use the 910T model.

---------- Post added at 07:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:26 PM ----------

Hey, any luck passing SN on your end?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] android_htc:
[MENTION=4395845]milesian[/MENTION], SN only passes on the following version of RamKernel:

https://goo.gl/XTNQZE (Enforcing version).

Note that I extracted boot.img as this version includes SuperSU and flashed in TWRP.

View attachment 3979756
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] milesian:
Thanks for the intel. One of your previous posts actually led me to trying out that version, but at the time I was not able to unroot SuperSU cleanly. Thanks to your boot.img tip, however, I was successful this time and SN passes with a Magisk setup! I was even able to add a card into Android Pay.

The problem is that the v3 kernel broke my wifi, and my camera lost the ability to focus =( Those issues were fixed in a later v3 re-release, but it again became SELinux permissive. In any case, from Ram121's comments back then, the very fact that that v3 kernel was enforcing was itself an accident.

Anyway, the verdict is that once Ram121 gets around to creating an enforcing v4 or v5 kernel for us, we'll be on the winning side of the Safety Net struggle. At least, until it's strengthened once again.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] rob_z11:
you have to Odin flash to stock rom for spen to work.

---------- Post added at 05:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:59 PM ----------

Odin flash to stock rom for your device, and use the fix someone has posted by going in dialer to update firmware for your device, and it will be as good as new.

you have to get some idea how far your touch is off to get the right buttons..
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Dai323:
Sorry but this won't work. I tried it. The solution is:

Dial *#2663# on your device (if you can't access hidden menu from dialer you can easily prompt them using ADB) and do all of the "FW" updates (outside of the internal storage ones..Sensor update option shouldn't hurt anything if you want to do that as well). Your options might look different but the 3 I circled will be there.

Only then was my Spen working. Drove me mad until I found a solution. Factory reset and going back to stock didn't work.

It's these:

And here are the ADB commands to access hidden menu if you can't from your dialer:
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Chimbat:
Just installed V5 for 910G on Aurora V5 Rom and it works like a charm for now. I 'll report later if any problem. At the moment I can see that auto brightness is working better here and I hope I'll be even more surprise by good things. Thank you for your work Ram121

Edit: Btw is there any special software to control this kernel or should I use kernel auditor? I couldn't see anything regarding this matter in the OP

using 910G / Aurora v5 / RamRom v5 / Govtuner 3.8
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Vuska:
Hi [MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION]... i really hope that this kernel would add interactive pro governor in it.

Thank you
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jglm4u:
Dude thanks, this helped me fix my wifi... is there something similar to this for fingerprint sensor ???
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] rob_z11:
any chance to add tap to wake feature?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Dai323:
No worries man. Not too sure on the fingerprint sensor. If you download an app called "Shortcut master lite" you can get a full list of ALL hidden menus and access them directly from there. Totally forgot to mention that app as a way to access the menus.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] pra7m:
Testing V5 final build.....:)
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Benny Bosser:
Been using the v5 since release (4 days now I think) and for me everything works fine.

Battery is good (4h - 4h30 on Note 7 port), performance is great, Bluetooth, GPS, data, WiFi all working and no stability issues.

Thanks for the great update!
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jonnie77:
Awaiting for release then!!!

N92$1$0F
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Chimbat:
Links to V5 test kernel are in this post if you want to give a try :

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=70220937&postcount=339
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] eshipp31:
Hey

[MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION] running ramkernel v4 for 910t running good would like to try v5 for 910t
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
RamKernel V5 R1

RamKernel V5 R1 update

From previous posts it is clear that attachments of XDA is having problem, when you download any file from multiple attached files it might be different and this caused problems to some people who have mentioned.

So for this problem now I have uploaded V5 R1 build to androidfilehost, My request to all is don't provide direct download link anywhere, provide link to thread, it will keep this thread alive and most seen thread.

Also consider donating for my hard work on this

Change log

1. Linux updated to 3.10.90 (probably first snapdragon note 4 kernel which is updated to this version of linux)

What's Linux version? - See the screenshot

View attachment 3982069

2. Zram enabled

3. Two versions of kernel given permissive and enforcing (enforcing for people having safety net or other problem)

For download go here

The download link contains link to kernel for G901F also, anyone downloading please keep in mind it's trial kernel
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jonnie77:
Thanks for your awesome work!!!in aurora when I press power saving the cpu keeps in maximum(I see the freqs live)is it kernel matter or we need an app to Do it?

N92$1$0F
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] android_htc:
[MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION],

This is simply amazing...you are the best!

SafetyNet now passes on my N910F!

Thanks for this excellent work.

View attachment 3982160

View attachment 3982161
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] android_htc:
[MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION],

Unable to send PayPal payment:

- error on link at post #373: "Sorry - your last action could not be completed".

- with email address: "This recipient is not eligible to receive funds"
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
If you are doing from mobile then , view XDA in desktop version then click on my user name in any post it will show menu like in screenshot, there is donate to me button, it is working

View attachment 3982209
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Gerxp:
With latest version I get an error in Tasker.

action Net - > Mobile Data can not be set.

No problem with ramkernel v1.

N910F, Aurora 4.1
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jonnie77:
The kernel is great no overheating issues can we get more time on screen or the max is 4 hours at the most?thanks again and merry Christmass!!!!

N92$1$0F
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Vuska:
Is in ram kernel, fast charging already on ?

Hope there is enable and disable button on kernel adiutor.

Also, maybe 'interactive pro' governor and Double tap to wake.

Nice kernel for Note 7 port.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] android_htc:
As mentioned earlier, using your email address or "donate to me button" does not work due to the restriction in the screenshot below?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
Ok i will check and reply
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
I can hardly wait for N910T v5 with enforcing. :)

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] BluePhnx:
It's there did you read ram121 post about ramkernel v5 R1 on the previous page? And click on "Here"?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
Yes I did see it. The file for v5 is for the 910F

The links for the N910T are v4, which I'm already running ;)

(unless I'm missing something?)

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] BluePhnx:
It says v5!
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
Your absolutely right. I was going by what I saw [MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION] post, saying the linked files were for the 910F. I didn't actually click on the folder to see what was inside. You are correct! Thanks.

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
Well.... I had mixed results testing v5 for N910T.

First, the enforcing version failed to boot. Stuck at Samsung logo. Running a note 7 port (Lanc-city Project L N7 v7). V4 runs fine on this rom.

On initial boot, I see the red text about seandroid... Than hangs on Samsung logo. I waited about 10 mins no boot. Tried refreshing, wiping caches, still no boot - same results.

Then I flashed the permissive version, it worked no problem. No red text (seandroid) just the yellow text as normal. So it booted fine. Ran a quick antutu Benchmark on v5 permissive and it scored 55k. On v4 it scored 78k. (same rom, build, everything... On change was the kernel)

I'm not sure why the enforcing kernel failed to boot? Did I miss a step? Or do I just not know what I'm doing?

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Alphaman10:
Same sinario on my N910W8..back on v4
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
Sorry it didn't work for you either but glad someone else confirmed my results. I always think I'm doing something wrong. [emoji12] [emoji2]

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Alphaman10:
No prob.. ram said it was a test version anyway..
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] noob4598:
N910T with V5
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Strider72:
Sorry to bother you but could you please elaborate me why do you prefer enforcing kernel over permissive?

You are also referring to the boot status with no red text and only yellow text as normal and my guess is that you mean "Set warranty bit kernel" .

I use permissive Ram Kernel V5 too for my N910F with Aurora port Note 7 without any problems but when boot starts the "red text" appears which by the way describes kernel status as "Not seandroid enforcing" in other words permissive which I think must be right.

Which of the two situations is the right one?

Thanks in advance.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
My end goal was to attempt to pass safety net and use Android pay. Other wise I personally see no reason one way or the other. But I would like to try and use Android pay. That why I wanted to try the enforcing kernel.

(and in all fairness, I may not have been able to get safety net to pass? Someone earlier said and showed they were able to accomplish this with the enforced kernel. So I wanted to try too)

Sent from my Samsung Note 6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] ps_minky16:
Mate should we use note 7 port one or the stock one for our V6? UberTC.

Or it is already included?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] The Sickness:
You may also want to update to Linux 3.10.103. It provides better stability and performance
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] lonegan:
Does this kernel have kcal support? Thanks

Enviado desde mi SM-N9300 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jd420724:
awesome work! thank you so much!
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
Already included for N910G V6
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] xavivts:
thank you very much for your great work, we needed a stock kernel as the Hani is long already, continue with new sources or'd just work here?

Thanks again
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] noob4598:
Hey bro, great work and thanks for the T build. PG2 kernel is working REALLY great on N910T on Overdrive MM rom. Battery life is extremely good with no lag at all or hit to performance at all. I love UberTC builds. RamKernel is sure to be a frontrunner. Thanks for all your hard work bro.

BTW... +1 the KCAL comment.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] rob_z11:
+1 for kcal support. Works good on 910t with note7 port.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] 2000Hugo:
Using your kernel on my N910F with Aurora V2 and working great and great battery life, thanks for your hard work...
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Suzano-Sho:
How much SOT are you getting with this configuration? I also have Overdrive MM and my phone tends to run hot while the battery life isn't so great...
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] noob4598:
I ain't got a clue bro....about sot time.....but I'll check startingg now. I actually just got it off the charger. You r device running hot with this kernel? This is one of the best I have used
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] garreth83@gmail.com:
Hi everyone... I am kinda confused of which version should I flash. Can someone be kind enough to tell me which of the below mentioned version should I flash please? My phone is SM-N910G, Stock Touchwiz ROM, 6.0.1 MM, Rooted with SuperSU Systemless mode (2.78 SR1), TWRP 3.0.2-0.

1. RamKernel_N7port_N910G_PH4_Sabermod_supersu_flash.zip

2. RamKernel_N910G_N7PortROM_PH2_UberTC_supersu_flash.zip

3. RamKernel_N910G_PH2_UberTC_supersu_flash.zip

4. RamKernel_N910G_PH4_Sabermod_supersu_flash.zip

Btw, what is the main difference between Sabremod & UberTC?

Thanks in advance! :)
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] free4flight:
910T here on N7 Port, working very well... thanks for your hard work. :)
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] emaysonet88:
Working flawlessly on n910t running xrom note 7 port
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Ram121:
Flash

RamKernel_N910G_PH2_UberTC_supersu_flash.zip

UberTC gives better performance
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Chamaka:
This kernel gives very good battery life compare to ale kernel and emotion Kernel. Everyone say it give good performance too. But I got only 48k in benchmark test.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] banzaip:
Installed and seem to work great. (@Chamaka : antutu give me around 75k !)

I have lost my wifi password, but it's not a big problem.

To install, I encountered some problems with root:

I start from a ROM MM _alexndr "root".

first try : flash ramkernel -> root is ok on apps already allowed, but impossible for others, no superSu app!

2nd try : reflash supersu 2.78 SR1 -> root is not ok, no supersu app

3rd try : flash ROM with NO root, flash ramkernel -> root OK, but no superSu

So I install supersu.apk and now all things seems ok !

Thanks.
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jonnie77:
Can u upload only kernel? Thanks in advance! !
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] cavemanb:
Delete
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] jd420724:
same here! 910T on N7 port, very smooth and respondsive, great battery life, feel like the best running kernel i have used on my N910T! thank you very much for hard work [MENTION=5229173]Ram121[/MENTION]:good: and thanks especially for EPG2 stock and N7 port versions
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Strider72:
Oh I see I've read this too.

And what about the red warning?
[Galaxy Note 4 Original Android Development] Araltd:
Not sure how or why I got such poor performance out of v5? I refreshed v4 and got 76k again. I did another test of v5 after it "settled" in for half or hour or so, and I got 44k! I guess it could be the rom? I dunno.... I'm not tweaking the cpu settings, it's just set to interactive Governor and that's it. But v4 76k and v5 55k at the best (or numbers close to that). You're getting way better results.

Sent from my Samsung Note 6

---------- Post added at 08:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:05 PM ----------

Oh I was just trying to describe the best way I could was all... :) not very scientific... Just trying to being detailed from memory. LOL ?

Sorry if that confused anyone.

Sent from my Samsung Note 6