yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] AdobeCRT:
Hello, I have an unlocked Samsung galaxy s7 edge (SM-G935U) using the Verizon network. This issue started after the most recent security update (Android Security Patch Level August 1, 2016) could maybe be a coincidence though, so when I make a call with a Bluetooth device connected I don’t lose LTE connection. When I make a call with a Bluetooth device connected and running a data app like google maps or Pokemon go I will lose LTE completely (the LTE symbol will disappear). until the phone call is over and any calls after this happens. I have tired unpairing and pairing it, I have tried different Bluetooth devices. I can make normal calls without a Bluetooth device and its fine, so it’s not a network issue. When I contacted Samsung tech support , They had me clear all Bluetooth data, reset app preferences, wiped the cache from the recovery menu, and formatted the phone. Samsung at one point told me I can't use data while on the phone Bluetooth or not (what is this 2010? and I don't have AT&T). I tested that and the phone allows me to use data fine while on the phone.

Samsung wants to replace the phone but I think that isn't going to help. Anyone else experiencing this issue? or any ideas what I can do to fix it?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] LazaPasi:
Windows mobile how it is possible to put it onto a today's day on 6 of his cases the comm manager,battery,screen rotate icons?

Thx
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] King of Rapture™:
Confused! You mean as plug-in for today screen or as icons on shell tray on today screen.

I believe as an plug-in, Ivan's ROM has it. As an shell tray, you need PHM TrayLaunch!

KOR! :)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] King of Rapture™:
Forgot this! :)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] King of Rapture™:
Oop! :)

Here you go!
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] LazaPasi:
NOT!

I would like this punctual,only WM6 meanwhile!

http://kepfeltoltes.hu/071121/322380475hfgjhjhgjg_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg

Jwrightmcps Crossbow ROM Update 2.12.06 is enabled!

Other wm6 roms not enabled today indicators!
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] King of Rapture™:
Here you go!

Try the first one and it should put all the 3 icons on the shell tray. If not than try the separate ones!
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] King of Rapture™:
If you need more than the 3 icons shown in your picture, than use the free PHM TrayLaunch provided above or use SBSH iLauncher!

You can fill up the whole row with any of the two above mentioned software!

KOR! :)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] LazaPasi:
But PHM TrayLaunch not good!

And devours the memory :(
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] LazaPasi:
Working!

Thx :)
[XDA Assist] :
Hello guys! I was flashing my phone upgrade but it stucked at 40% and now phone not working. So please can somebody do a port of clean not updated firmware for KINGZONE Z1 PLUS?

It will really help me a lot... Thank you guys :)
[XDA Assist] malybru:
I see you found the correct place to post:

http://xdaforums.com/android/help/please-stock-rom-kingzone-z1-plus-t3462861

Thread closed
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Questions & Answers] AdamDevlopper:
So far i used Cyanogemod and was able to record at 60FPS with the Camera that was built in Cyanogemod with not Problem...

I installed "Snapdragon camera" but i get just force Closes after force Closes

Did someone got 60FPS Working on the redmi note 3 Pro? On Miui 6.9.9 Marshmallo?!

Thanks
[Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Questions & Answers] gamesky:
are you sure it's 60fps? try copy to a pc and see the actual fps..because I was on cm13 last time and used opencamera to record video on 1080p60fps settings..copied back to pc and check the framerate still 30fps.
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mrcomedicgenius:
Build MMB29K. I've tried and can't get TWRP loaded on there. I just bought this phone, but thinking about sending it back and keeping my rooted Note 3 if I can't get this to root! Here is the partial link to my post on Reddit about this same topic:

galaxynote4/comments/52my2m/has_anyone_been_able_to_root_their_smn910v/

Still no solution. Please help!
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Darkehorse99:
Same here

Can't get Odin to write the bootloader successfully.
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mojoswagger1980:
Right if u took the ota you are locked as far the bootloader goes ....flashing will not be possible til this is corrected ....im told u can odin back to 5.1.1 which has a pretty easy method the safely upgrade so rooting and unlock are simplified. I never tried to rooting from the stock firmware.... does kingroot ever get u rooted? If so the u could try the aforementioned method but u would need a 6.0.1 compatible kernel (Sprint) given u r on there dev cid .
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] weard1212:
in the verizon note 4 form is where you should be looking because you have a locked bootloader.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] drfsupercenter:
I know there's a "systemless root" method that works on the S6/S6 edge without blowing Knox efuse, is there one for S7 yet?
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] MAX 404:
Sorry to say....no yet on the exynos models , on the snapdragon is possible but with the engboot ( bootloader still lock)
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] drfsupercenter:
Mine is Snapdragon. I don't mind locked bootloaders either... my previous phone (Droid 4) had a locked bootloader, that's what Safestrap was for!

http://i.imgur.com/oWCzmW0.png

Got any info on how to do it?
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] MAX 404:
Sure right here

Read and ask before doing anything.......
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] drfsupercenter:
OK, cool... and you're 100% sure this won't blow the eFuse?

I searched for "s7 root knox" and didn't find anything helpful. :P
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Questions and Answers] MAX 404:
They claim on the thread so , read and ask there for sure they would know better than me , I have an exynos model

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=67730565&postcount=705
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] pigglett:
Firstly well done for this thread

• Samsung is indicating refurbished Note 7 devices (refurbished being recalled stock that is overhauled and reissued as the '2nd batch') via an 'RF' designation in front of the serial number

Explain this then to the idiot's in the media ...

My 1st Note which received on the 30th August 2016 had RF in from of the serial

My replacement which i received 12th September 2016 has RF in front of the serial

So my 1st which I ordered from Samsung UK direct and was in 1st 1000 was a refurbished model ??? say is as I still have it at home
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] jongilluley:
Ok to share my experience for this thread...

Country of Purchase - UK

Phone Supplier - O2

Date original received - 30/08/16

Date Replacement Recieved - 12/09/16

Sticker on replacement box - Small black square

Serial Number Starting Letters (Original) - RF

Serial Number Starting Letters (Replacement) - RF

Manufacture Date of Replacement - 01/09/2016

Country of Manufacture - Vietnam

The whole RF being a refurb is bull how can my device be manufactured on the 1st of the month, be sent out, sold to a customer, returned to Samsung, refurbished, sent back out to the network provider and then sent to me within 11 days!
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] stevierayvaughan:
Received mine today (Canada). Original = 08/31/16, replacement = 09/15/16. Small black square on box, Made in China, serial number opening characters on both original and replacement = R28.

Also just set up Secure Folder and no problems there as I wanted to test that line in OP.

edit: This might be completely unrelated to the exchange program, but my original had the screen protector placed inaccurately, in that the lower half of the top speaker+lens+sensors were covered by it, letting it get some air underneath and struggle to stay on with my case (at the top). The replacement is placed perfectly, and I mean I just grabbed my measuring tape and checked like the huge nerd I am and it is precise, just perfect.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] alltaken123:
Thanks for this, I'm going to amend the line accordingly. I have noticed with my replacement that the reported expansion gap (present on my first device) is no longer present, no light bleed can be observed either.

Are those your manufacture dates? I guess not given the replacement date being the 15th.?
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] stevierayvaughan:
How can I see the manufacture dates? I checked on the box there's nothing nor on the little label on the back of the phone, just serial number and model number etc. The dates I gave are for when I received/activated the phones.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] alltaken123:
If you use this it should give you the info:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.vndnguyen.phoneinfo&hl=en_GB
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] stevierayvaughan:
Ok here's what I get:

Original N7 - MADE IN CHINA / 2016.08.13

Replacement N7 - MADE IN CHINA / 2016.08.31

And thank for the app link, it even has the temperatures very useful!
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] alltaken123:
You're welcome, thanks for contributing.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] winol:
my note 7 bought before the recall, on 28 august, has a a serial beginning with RF, so, RF means nothing
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] marktang:
From Canada here. Received my replacement phone today. It is sealed in the box but it does not have black or blue dot or sticker. Not sure if I should open it still.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Ss4kak:
Hey guys I'm curious did you have to return the phone and the box with everything to get the new one or just the phone? Thanks
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] pigglett:
I've still got my 1st note 7 ...wondering when Samsung will call for me to return it :p
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] bonerp:
Return the box with everything in it. No need to return your gifts.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] AB__CD:
I find the manufacturing info to be terribly inaccurate. My GS7 clearly states "MADE IN INDONESIA" on the box, but the app says China.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] fuel3100:
I'm in abu dhabi. Unit manufactured July 30, serial number starts with RF. Waiting for replacement. Is anyone there returned the unit with box incomplete accessories? They accept?
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Novarider:
Is the imei listed on the sticker on the outside of the box? If so check it on samsung website to see if it says you are OK.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] marktang:
yes i checked...it says unrecognized. but my old phone it says affected...so i'm assuming the new one is ok
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] alltaken123:
My replacement also shows as unrecognised. I think you're okay to keep the device. I'll be sure to keep an eye out for anymore reports of a replacement in Canada not having a sticker, if another instance occurs I'll update.

Thanks for sharing!
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] bluebirdsmike:
How can I see the batt_type for my note 7. I've tried the Phone INFO Samsung App?
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] GibMcFragger:
It's odd how the replacements all have IMEI numbers (including mine) that show as unrecognised when checked.

How are we supposed to verify to ANYONE that our phones won't explode, outside of carrying the box around? I think Samsung is dropping the ball here.

I swear that just went through all the stock they had and scanned the IMEI label. I bet they have an in house app to check if the battery pack is affected or not. If not, it gets the black square and sold.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] alltaken123:
From a file browser in the root directory go to /sys/class/power_supply/battery/batt_type and open in a text editor.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] marktang:
but i didnt get a black squared lol
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] BarryH_GEG:
So rather than make that publically available so people could test their phones they instead decided to lose billions of dollars in cash and lost market cap and recall all of them?

How folks are supposed to know the difference between good and bad Note7's is a good question. IMEI checking is fine but that's not going to help on an airplane should a Note7 be questioned. I thought the CPSC would have mandated some type of external identification for new devices but they didn't. That's kind of testament to how low the risk probably is. Bigger picture, how would someone buying a used GM car that had its ignition switch replaced verify that? Or that a Honda had its Takata airbag replaced? In both cases I'm guessing its by VIN number which isn't much different than by IMEI number.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] rjohnstone:
I ran the IMEI of the Note 7 I turned in and it showed up as a recalled device.

Sounds like they haven't fully populated the IMEI recall db yet.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Gary02468:
Why not? Even if the plane lacks an Internet connection, Samsung could easily put the whole (encrypted) IMEI database into an app that flight attendants could run on their own phones during the flight.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] BarryH_GEG:
I take it you don't travel much. That or fly non-unionized airlines. Asking a flight attendant to prove the negative will have you arrested for interfering with the duties of flight crew. At least in the U.S. Asking a flight attendant for a full can of soda in the U.S. borders on interfering with the duties of flight crew. Note7 owners will have to prove their devices are safe. Not the other way around where people questioning have to prove they're unsafe. It's going to be a problem; at least initially.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Gary02468:
You're changing your story. In the post I responded to, you claimed that if you're on an airplane, you would need an external identifier (to "prove the negative") instead of using the IMEI (to "prove the negative"). My point is that the flight crew could just as readily use either method.

And no, merely asking the flight crew to check something will not "have you arrested" (or if it does, you can successfully sue for damages). Refusing to comply may have you justly arrested, but politely asking will not.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] themissionimpossible:
If not requiring an Internet connection there are a lot of ways to create and run a faked checking app showing always a safe Note7...

IMHO it would be a child's play for any android hacker to make such a bogus app if the check would be allowed to be also performed offline...;)

Only an online check could offer some assurance of being reliable, but even in this case the checking app might be forged, especially on rooted phones.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Gary02468:
You misread my comment. I was talking about a Samsung-provided IMEI-checking app that the flight crew would run on their own phones, not an app that would run on the passenger's Note 7.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] themissionimpossible:
And how the flight crew would enter the IMEI in such a Samsung app?

Manually entered?

Impossible... too long and too hard to do manually, and prone to errors... Do you know how long is an IMEI? .;)

Not to speak about where the Note7 IMEI should be read from...

From a possibly forged Info screen running on the Note 7?

Or from a possibly faked dedicated app?

However you put it, IMHO they are all insecure solutions that a hacker can easily cheat...;)
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Gary02468:
No, scan/OCR.

The IMEI is inscribed externally on the back of the phone. That's no easier to forge than any other external marking by which Samsung could have distinguished the post-recall phones.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] themissionimpossible:
I can't see any IMEI printed on the back cover of my S7E, but don't know about Note 7.

Not to speak about people possibly using covers or body protectors on their Note 7 that should be removed for performing this check.

Anyway, IMHO scanning + OCR would be an equally challenging task...

Last but not least, which are the smartphones to be used for running that Samsung checking app? The flight crew's personal phones? Impractical...

Or should Samsung offer 1 free smartphone to any flight crew? ;)
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Gary02468:
It's there on your S7E too. If you illuminate it from an oblique angle, it becomes prominently visible.

Yes, but that applies equally to any other external marking to distinguish the post-recall phones. As I said repeatedly, my only point here is that there's not much difference regardless of what kind of marking is used for the purpose.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] BarryH_GEG:
There are hundreds of brands and models of phones. It's ridiculous to even expect airline personnel to be able to specifically identify any Note7. It's a burden being put on the airlines because of a defective single phone put out by a single OEM. It's even more ridiculous to expect that said burdened airline is going to ask their personnel to use their personal non-airline issued mobile devices to check whether a single phone from a single OEM is safe or unsafe. So in order to change the "no live Note7's allowed onboard" current policy (assuming personnel could identify a Note7 in the first place) it's 100% up to Samsung to convince them they should. If Samsung doesn't have an easy way for

us owners

to provide the airline the information they want/need

we're

screwed. And it's not the airline's fault nor should they have to involve their personnel in the process.

Someone here's a pilot for AC and we laughed about trying to enforce the "no Note7's onboard" policy when it first came out because it's next to impossible.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Gary02468:
If that's true then an external "post-recall" marking won't help either. As I said repeatedly, my only point is that such a marking wouldn't make much difference (compared to IMEI-checking).

Eventually, airlines will have to adopt some general IMEI-checking technology. This is not the last time some phone, tablet, laptop, smart watch, etc. is going to be recalled due to a battery defect.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] alltaken123:
It's far more likely that after a 'free and clear' period of incidents that the devices will be normalised again. Either that or the devices will be limited to 60% worldwide, thus avoiding any risk.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] redzion:
Slovenia

Also RF on serial.. so RF is standard and battery affectes serial.

We will got 128GB microSD card as gift for problems...
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] sebastianlow:
Seems like they are gonna change the battery icon to green. Which is kinda ugly tbh.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] colliderz:
Quote from somewhere else.

It's a shame that the phone has suffered such a terrible fate because without this whole issue it is actually a very good phone.

That said, the fault does lie with Samsung despite what the apologists round here will tell you. This kind of issue tends to happen when you rush something to market, in this case simply to beat the release date of your opponent.

Because of this though the device and possibly the future of the whole range has been brought into jeopardy, and Samsung only have themselves to blame.

They have handled the recall as best they can, but that is not good enough. The issue, that has resulted in burns, torched cars and damage to property should not have been allowed to happen in the first place.

They have made another fatal error though, the replacement phones don't look any different to the affected ones, the only way to tell is to check the IMEI on their database. This means bans on the device will continue on planes, public transport and other areas too.

They should have put an obvious identifying mark there, this mistake will once again cost them dearly.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] lowjinyik:
I think a bright green battery icon on a mostly white and blue UI is distinct enough to tell if your device is safe
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] alltaken123:
Thanks for this, I've updated the post accordingly, for completeness could you provide me with a link to the tweet please?
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Ryland Johnson:
Your post, in general, is at best myopic and at worst pure unsubstantiated fiction.

One device exploding is one too many HOWEVER the Note 7 is not the first device, nor the last, to have this occur. Every manufacturer who uses this type of battery technology will have examples of this problem as it is inherent to the design and type of battery used.

Let me make it clear I am NOT defending nor crucifying Samsung. I am bringing some balance to your unbalanced post. Samsung have done what most other brands would have swept under the carpet, as some HAVE already done so in the past.

Where Samsung dropped the ball was to fail to make the recall 'official' from the beginning. THAT has caused a major problem for owners, retailers and Samsung themselves.

For you to suggest that 35 incidents specific to the Note 7 will bring into question all the Samsung range of mobiles is absurd.

For you to crystal ball gaze then make a totally fictional statement that Samsung is to blame because they rushed the Note 7 into production to beat another brand to release is also the work of pure fiction. Further to write "The issue that has resulted in burns, torched cars and damage to property should not have been allowed to happen in the first place". 3.5 million produced, 36 have had this problem. HOW can such an incident be avoided? There is no such thing in the world of technology as complete safety . The fact Samsung recognised this situation early on and tried to rectify it does show they are a responsible company. Though this situation has caused me numerous problems and others even more is most regrettable and unfortunate but it WILL happen again, its the nature of the battery technology used, it cannot be made 100% guaranteed safe.

I think Samsung did the best they could at the time. I trust Samsung. I respect the effort on their part to recall the mobile, in hindsight they should have made the recall official.

In reading this forum one very concerning point has caused me to pause. Have you read the attitude of some owners of this mobile? They have continued to use the device despite the knowledge there is a problem, no matter how small. I call that selfish and puerile. I also detest the way some responsible customers have been treated when trying to replace their mobile. Even though I returned my mobile the day news broke, Samsung in this country only emailed me last night requesting I return my mobile. That is absurd conduct by local Samsung importers. Again this could and should have been avoided if Samsung made the recall official.

Lastly, you do realise you are more likely to be struck by lightning than have the Note 7 burn! Please be more realistic and much less alarmist when making your posts.

Ryland
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] lowjinyik:
It's on the "Samsung Mobile Singapore" Facebook group. They have replied several people regarding the issue. I have a screenshot of it in my previous post.
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] joaodrp:
Why will they do this? Green battery indicator? That is against Google's guidelines, and ugly!

Why don't they change the affected ones to red instead?
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] lowjinyik:
Yea that's a pretty good idea but people could just refuse to update and I guess the FAA wouldn't be too happy about that. It would be nice if we could toggle it tho
[Note 7 Questions & Answers] Gary02468:
Wow, talk about unsubstantiated fiction! The reported burn rate of Note 7s has been rough 35 per week per million phones in use. That comes to approximately 1,800 fires per year per million phones. If 1,800 people per million per year were struck by lightning, that would add up to 12.6 million people struck per year, or more that half a million in the US alone. The actual number in the US is around 500 (and about 50 of those strikes are fatal).

So yes, Note 7 fires are infrequent. But contrary to your statement, you're about 1,000 times more likely to have your (pre-recall) Note 7 catch fire than you are to be struck by lightning in the same time period.