yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[SuperSU] NUGZZ420:
Zip download link

https://androidfilehost.com/?w=file...5e5a33605aabd818b0bd59304d56fa4817a997d647170
[SuperSU] lethall1:
Hello, may be I missed some news. There is no supersu application in Play store. The link from official web site doesn't work too.
[SuperSU] andreoide:
Maybe? For sure!

Maybe its a good idea to read some posts before yours
[SuperSU] Ch3vr0n:
I don't need any links. Still have the SR5 zip, but I just did confirm 'SuperSU' is no longer listed on the play store. Just the 'pro' license file. Maybe they're 'finally' pulling the plug on it? It's not even listed anymore in my play store apps library or 'installed' apps list.

Anyone have any news on that?

Sent from my Nexus 6P with Tapatalk
[SuperSU] Strephon Alkhalikoi:
Google pulled apps from the Play Store that hadn't seen updates in at least a year. I have at least two apps on my device that are no longer on the Play Store for this very reason. It stands to reason that SuperSU suffered the same fate.
[SuperSU] DB126:
Not due to age; likely pulled due to violation of terms and/or non-conformance to design standards.
[SuperSU] Strephon Alkhalikoi:
[MENTION=5488402]Davey126[/MENTION]: Danke for jogging my memory. If I recall correctly all apps now have to target a recent API in their manifest. The apps I have which are now missing didn't target the recent API and the developers never updated the apps.
[SuperSU] HemanthJabalpuri:
In my playstore SuperSU disappeared.....!

anyone confirm this in your case too.....

Edit: Just saw the above posts sorry
[SuperSU] Ch3vr0n:
I doubt it's due to not confirming to design standards or they'd have pulled it long ago. Maybe it's finally time to switch to magisk. Ugh can't believe I'm saying that. Though I still have the SR5 file for when next months security patch update goes live :). If it works, I'll prob stick with su for another month.

Sent from my Nexus 6P with Tapatalk
[SuperSU] Strephon Alkhalikoi:
No, it's due to Google requiring all apps to target a recent API in their manifests. CCMT didn't bother changing SuperSU - Chainfire would have - and thus Google yanked SuperSU from the Play Store.

I won't talk about Magisk's virtues here but will say to use SuperSU if you're happy with it. Just be ready to switch, as a day will come when SuperSU will stop working, because with no one around to fix it you'll have little choice.
[SuperSU] Ch3vr0n:
That explains it, and yes I'm ready to switch at any point, but until SSU stops working I'll stick with it. Just hoping that FlashFire will still work on the Nexus 6p with a recent magisk (last fully known is 14.2). But that's a different matter

Sent from my Nexus 7 with Tapatalk
[SuperSU] dizky:
nvm
[SuperSU] Ibuprophen:
Based upon what "a little birdie" had told me...

SuperSU was removed because there was a combination of a few deciding factors by Google...

There's been unanswered feedback complaints and those few that were answered, by CCMT, also provided URL links for support that took them to a dead link.

That combined with (and resulted in) individuals reporting CCMT and the SuperSU app to Google reflecting them and various other complaints to Google.

After so long for CCMT being unresponsive to Google's messages had resulted in it being pulled until further notice (or permanently) until/unless CCMT addresses whatever issues that Google outlined to them.

Also, the only reason that the paid app is still on the Play Store is because Google didn't have the issue with the Placebo like "Unlock Key" version since, on its own, won't harm any devices if installed.

I hope that I had explained it okay via text. I only got the info as "Generalized" since I couldn't get any more of the exacting/specific details.

I just thought that it would spread the word...

I bet [MENTION=631273]Chainfire[/MENTION] is just besides himself with what has become of his Years of Hard Work going down the tubes. :confused:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
[SuperSU] Kraiye:
So it's pulled from play store.

Why aren't the download links working on the website?

Or is it just me?

Can't someone just provide a link to d/l the .apk and we can install it outside of play store?

[edit]All I've been able to find is the flashable 2.82 SR5 (which, if anyone is interested, contains the .apk inside the zip in the 'common' folder).

Here's the link:

https://xdaforums.com/apps/supersu/2014-09-02-supersu-v2-05-t2868133

Seems to work OK but keeps prompting (and then failing) to update binary.
[SuperSU] DB126:
There is no reason to switch if SU is working and satisfying your needs. Most of my gizmos are happy with 2.82 SR5. A few are on Magisk as that was the easier path. As for design standards, Google continues to make 'refinements' which can result in long standing apps getting pulled if the developer doesn't make adjustments. Accessibility adjustments is one such example. Not sure why SU was removed from the Play Store (nor is that information relevant).

---------- Post added at 02:56 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:51 AM ----------

Same questions have been answered numerous times in this thread; not going to spoon feed answers to the latest drive by poster.

SuperSU 2.82 SR5 downloads are available from multiple reputable download/hosting sites. Google is your friend.
[SuperSU] Kraiye:
Yeah... Not gonna be flicking through 250+ pages on my mobile.

I found chainfires sr5 download through google, so am just helping others who might be in the same spot as me. Ie: just finding out about all this now.
[SuperSU] jcmm11:
Don't pull the apk. Flash the entire zip. That should eliminate your prompting issue
[SuperSU] Kraiye:
Thanks. I tried that a couple times and it appears successful but the app doesn't appear in my apps.

Does a flash install hide it by default?

I have to install again with apk for it to show up - maybe doing both is a bit dirty.

I need to hide root from a couple of apps so I'm gonna try migisk anyway.
[SuperSU] jcmm11:
Flash install normally installs the apk as well. If it doesn't then pull the apk and install it manually, after flashing the zip. (It sometimes glitches installing the apk for whatever reason and Chainfire would recommend pulling then installing the apk).

For hiding root you can try suhide, but Magisk is probably the better option nowadays since suhide hasn't been updated in a while (although that may work to it's advantage as well. Detection is probably focused on Magisk and may overlook suhide. Then again that's probably just wishful thinking)
[SuperSU] cdoublejj:
deleted
[SuperSU] BIOYAM:
Hope someone can help.......

After reading many of the 1152 pages of posts, I still have a question.....hope this wasn't answered before........

I recently acquired a T-mobile s7 on Marshmallow. As I am using another threads rooting method from 2 years ago, I am being advised to use SuperSU v2.76 because newer versions back then had issues with Marshmallow. Is that still the case, or can I update to the newest v2.82?

I checked the change-logs, but see no mention of Marshmallow at all.

Thanks in advance for any help.
[SuperSU] DB126:
There were several issues with 2.79-2.81 and early 2.82 builds. Recommend going with 2.82 SR5.
[SuperSU] BIOYAM:
Thanks you very much for your answer.
[SuperSU] matrix_guy:
Is there any supersu version compatible with Android pie?
[SuperSU] Ch3vr0n:
Unlikely, since there hasn't been a new release since CCMT took over and pretty much abandoned it then and there.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn Nexus 6P met Tapatalk
[SuperSU] mielletseed:
I'm using 2.82 SR5 on my S4 Mini running LOS 16 (Android 9.0), it's working fine.
[SuperSU] ktmom:
The difference between your S4 and the newer phones most likely to get Pie is the A/B slot configuration.

My personal guess is the older, non A/B slot devices will probably work.

"find somebody that you think is undeserving of your compassion and give it to them" - Christian Picciolini
[SuperSU] CRMBTDI:
How to root Motorola Moto G5 / Gigaset GS170

Hello altogether,

please forgive me for these two questions, but I didn't understand:

How can I root a Motorola Moto G5 and a Gigaset GS170 ?

Which of these mobile is easier to root?
[SuperSU] ktmom:
You need to look in the device forums for each device to learn about rooting options, or ask in a general Q/A thread.

This thread is about a root app which is not the same as the process required before you are able to install it - which is known as "rooting". Typically it starts with unlocking the bootloader and installing a custom recovery but on some devices, there are other exploits required. All of that is in device specific forums.

"find somebody that you think is undeserving of your compassion and give it to them" - Christian Picciolini
[SuperSU] andreoide:
Or start reading [MENTION=243864]xda[/MENTION] university:

https://xdaforums.com/general/xda-university/attempt-generic-root-explanation-t3815651

Goodluck.

:good:
[SuperSU] ktmom:
Did you quote the wrong person?

"find somebody that you think is undeserving of your compassion and give it to them" - Christian Picciolini
[SuperSU] krug3r:
Hi all

I have a Nexus 7 Razor (v2013) with an old SuperSu v2.41.

Can I upgrade directly to v2.82 with the link in first updated post, without problem ?

Thx for the great job
[SuperSU] Wolfcity:
Should be no problem to flash it via TWRP.

I recommend to use the SR5 2.82 version as this is the last and most stable one.
[SuperSU] andreoide:
No my friend,

I'm sorry its not clear but maybe i had to put it like:

Maybe HE should start reading the XDA university.

What I wrote was more Kent as addition to the tips you gave him

Sorry for misunderstanding :(
[SuperSU] dave2103:
Anyone else having a problem trying to download the supersu zip file? When I try either in the app or using chrome, I just get an error page
[SuperSU] Wolfcity:
When you tried to download from OP there are maybe 100 people who can't download it and if you read some pages back you also know why.

Here's the link for latest stable SR5 2.82: https://androidfilehost.com/?fid=5862345805528049513

If you want another file read the last pages.
[SuperSU] corkiejp:
SuperSU has been removed from the Play Store

SuperSU has been removed from the Play Store

The final straw, just removed it from my Nexus 9 today, the last device I had that was still using it.

Edit: - Ideally these threads should be locked and a message posted to look elsewhere!
[SuperSU] Basil Rathbone:
No apps configured

I downloaded and installed SuperSU* v2.82 with TWRP** on my Samsung Galaxy Note 4 SM-910F. I also upgraded to SuperSU Pro.

Default access is set to [Prompt] but all I get is: 'No apps configured"

Should I just ask for a refund?

* SuperSU-v2.82-201705271822.zip

** twrp-3.2.3-0-trlte.img.tar
[SuperSU] Ibuprophen:
To be honest...

It's funny how the developer removed the actual app and left the pro version for individuals to purchase.

It just looks to me like this is a type of scam to just to obtain money from purchasing the pro version without providing the actual product it's for.

This is just my opinion... :eek:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
[SuperSU] andreoide:
How short sighted to say it's scam.

When chainfire still maintained the app the PRO version could be bought for life.

So I am one of the Pro-buyers.

How nice of him to still have the Pro version online in google play store for me to download and (re)-install without having to pay for it again. Its kept available for me . How thoughtful.

Its a free choice, no one forces you or is misleading you or play dirty tricks anyway.

I highly do respect chainfire for all his work and effort all the years active in XDA and beneath, I dare to say without his effort the development of custom ROMs and rooting devices would not have taken the big steps as it did in the past.
[SuperSU] Ibuprophen:
I don't believe that you had comprehend that post...

I NEVER stated that it WAS a scam. Only that it looked that way based upon the recent decision that was made by "CCMT" who removed it and it's CCMT who receives the monies for the Pro Purchase.

I've also NEVER stated or expressed anything but, Gratitude and Support for [MENTION=631273]Chainfire[/MENTION] and he has not had any control over the SuperSU development for approximately a year +/-.

Please don't take this the wrong way but, only a lesson learned... :thumbup:

Peace and Love!

Peace and Love!

~Ringo Starr

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
[SuperSU] jcmm11:
I don't think CCMT removed it, I think it's Google's doing. And the Pro version probably doesn't violate whatever standard caused them to pull the actual app.

Yes the Pro version should be pulled (just read the latest comments) but I suspect that won't happen until/unless Google gets enough complaints.
[SuperSU] SacredDeviL666:
Hi All,

We have enough of bickering without giving our opinion about what the company has done after purchasing from Chainfire.

So lets not add more oil to the fire when its not really relevant, not in this thread atleast!

Few posts edited. Lets all calm down and move along :highfive:

If you find a post unpleasant please hit report and we will look into it.
[SuperSU] Basil Rathbone:
My error - No apps configured - but ...

I guess I only thought I had rooted my device. I flashed my phone with CF-Auto-Root-trlte-trltexx-smn910f.tar.md5 and now have root ... but it replaced TWRP with what looks to be a stock recovery image.

Does this mean I'll lose root again if I re-flash my phone with twrp-3.2.3-0-trlte.img.tar?
[SuperSU] ktmom:
This is a question best asked in your device forum. My guess is no, flashing TWRP will not replace the boot.img (kernel) but maybe it's wierd on your device [emoji846]

As a side note: the ".md5" file is a checksum for the actual archive. It's not the file you flashed.

"find somebody that you think is undeserving of your compassion and give it to them" - Christian Picciolini
[SuperSU] andreoide:
I use the XDALabs-app and I don't see option to report.
[SuperSU] DB126:
You can't from the app; need to copy the post url, load it in a browser and report from there. Awkward but workable.
[SuperSU] BillGoss:
Actually, for Odin flashable files the "standard" is to embed the md5 checksum in the compressed file, hence *.tar.md5. So he did flash the correct file.
[SuperSU] werdck:
Hey, all the recovery flashable zip file links are down!
[SuperSU] madbat99:
Flip through the last few pages you'll see tons of links, and people saying the links are down.
[SuperSU] jcmm11:
In any case you really want SR5 and those links are still working afaik. (Or Magisk, depending on phone, Android version, and your exact needs)
[SuperSU] DB126:
Download links:

https://download.chainfire.eu/1220/SuperSU/SR5-SuperSU-v2.82-SR5-20171001224502.zip

https://www.apkmirror.com/apk/codingcode/supersu/supersu-2-82-sr5-release/
[SuperSU] :
Just use magisk. Supersu is not updated and not stable. Really sad. Liked to use it and bought pro Version too
[SuperSU] IronTechmonkey:
...and you can save the step of copy/pasting URL when viewing a thread in Labs app by: Menu > Load in browser.
[SuperSU] DB126:
Good tip but doesn't always work depending on default (preferred) app settings. In my case any URL containing "xdaforums.com" opens in the XDA labs app which effectively kills the "Load in browser" function.
[SuperSU] Ibuprophen:
The following is typically the same for most devices...

Go into your device Settings Menu -> Apps -> XDA Labs -> Scroll down and select the "Open by default" -> Select the "Open supported links" and then choose "Ask every time".

Now when you select the option to open within your browser, you'll be able to select your browser.

Just remember not to select the option to use that option always unless you want to. If you do, then you'll have to repeat the above steps for whichever app you choose (Labs, Browser, etc...) to clear that option again.

I do know that there's one or two other methods for accomplishing this as well but, posting all the options may confuse some members.

I hope that I had explained this okay via text... :)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
[SuperSU] DB126:
Thanks, [MENTION=1803258]ibu[/MENTION]orophen. Your explanation was very clear. :)

I am familiar with that setting but prefer to keep the default set to 'explicit' as the vast majority (95+%) of links I want to open in Labs app. On the rare occasion I wish a different action I can simply use cut/paste.
[SuperSU] KryptonKal-El:
RIP SuperSU? Thank you for the fun times or should I expect a resurrection anytime soon?
[SuperSU] jcmm11:
RIP
[SuperSU] DB126:
Continues to function until it doesn't. No need to run away if everything works. Use 2.82 SR5 which has proven stable across a wide array of devices including many on the latest Android builds.
[SuperSU] NYLimited:
Speaking only for myself..

I have not recommended any product which has been out of development or maintenance and have not been updated by anyone in a long time. This includes and old favorite (Secure Settings) and an all-time favorite from Chainfire (SuperSU). Just sayin'....
[SuperSU] SammaelAkuma:
Yes, because as I've tried to get across to a developer of an app I used to use on Nougat(app in question being WiFi Tether Router), SuperSU isn't going to be around forever and he needs to look into supporting more than just that as the root method for his app to work. That and he's adamant that SuperSU works on my phone(SM-J727P) under Oreo. Which does not as it constantly bootloops when I try to install it. Even asked the ROM rollers/developers of the phone if it would work prior to updating, not thinking that the developer of the app would be so short-sighted. Boy, was I wrong. Needless to say, yes, SuperSU is wonderful when it works. When it doesn't, it's pain in the rear to find apps that work with SuperSU's alternatives that do what you need them to.
[SuperSU] DB126:
Yes - it is a pain when things don't work but your closing statement is one reason why folks continue to use SuperSU. :)
[SuperSU] The Analog Kid:
Well, SuperSU SR5 worked fine up to my previous Moto G4 Plus under MM 6.0... but it seems it would not be as reliable on my current Moto Z2 Play under 8.0... Since SuperSU development is abandoned for more than a year now, no wonder why it started causing some trouble. You know, I used to root every single device I had same day it landed on my hands, no delay, and I started picking up Moto devices since original Moto G because of the ease; but now I've spent more than a week just digging everywhere in research about the proper way to root my device in the straightforward manner I was used to. Keep counting. Seems those days are gone. Farewell to SuperSU. But not to root of course. Things are just getting harder for developers... I assume.
[SuperSU] DB126:
Yep - opted for Magisk on my E4 (stock 7.1.x) because is was the easiest and most functional option given documentation and f2fs bug. I have considered flopping back to SuperSU but can see no benefit. On all other devices SuperSU SR5 continues to serve me well. Certainly easier to deal with; I have long stopped updating Magisk as you never know what goodies lie in the latest release. I prefer to use my devices vs manage/recover them.
[SuperSU] partcyborg:
For the millionth time, that if not possible for every user of SuperSU. Magisk doors not and can not by design support users who have system root on devices with locked bootloaders. If you're going to offer up your unsolicited opinion at least make sure it hadn't been shown to be just plain bad advise numerous times in the same exact thread ?
[SuperSU] :
I only read bla bla bla
[SuperSU] DB126:
Ignorance is bliss.
[SuperSU] MjklSimpson:
dead link

https://prnt.sc/l5dzaz

this appears after i try to download it by the twrp flashable zip link, please help :confused:

(i actually noticed this by i think a week ago when i tried to root my phone and because of this i had to use an old zip that i found in my hard drive but only now that i installed a pie rom that i'm actually posting)
[SuperSU] Ibuprophen:
For those who don't like to search this thread... :eek:

The following is the thread post has a link to where you can obtain (almost) every SuperSU release by Chainfire. It provides the "unmodified" Apk and Flashable Zip.

https://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=76650463

It's my repository that's always an option that everyone is more than welcome to obtain them from.

Enjoy! :)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
[SuperSU] DJPMcG:
Doesn’t work for me
[SuperSU] jcmm11:
You expect to get help with that post? You don't even specify what exactly doesn't work or in what way it doesn't work or what device or what version of Android or anything that even remotely resembles some relevant background information.
[SuperSU] Ibuprophen:
That looks allot like a post count to me... LOL!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
[SuperSU] jcmm11:
Possible, figured I'd give him benefit of the doubt.
[SuperSU] alexus96:
Hello. I have installed SuperSU v2.82 on my rooted Samsung Galaxy S5 (SM-G900F), that I rooted with "CF-AUTOROOT" method. I wanna remove root because I need to install banking apps that doesn't work under root, so I wanna use "Complete Unroot" function of SuperSU, but it says: "Do you want to restore boot stock image?" (I have attached a screenshot, I'm italian..). I would to know: if I press YES will I lose my data on my mobile phone? Is it a factory reset?? Thank you!

http://imgur.com/oKDcncP
[SuperSU] Fif_:
Yes, you'd want to restore the stock image. No, you won't have to do a factory reset.

However, I would still perform a full TWRP backup, and copy everything off the phone before unrooting, just in case ;)
[SuperSU] alexus96:
So, if I restore stock image I will not lose data, right?
[SuperSU] madbat99:
You shouldn't. But as he stated back up everything off of the device first. There are many reasons why this device may not boot up after you restore the boot image, like dmverity. If the stock boot image has encryption forced and DMVerity you may have to format data just to get the device to boot up. So again, backup everything.
[SuperSU] Ibuprophen:
At the time that SuperSU was installed, it backs up the stock boot image before modifying it for SuperSU.

When it asks you that question, it would just remove the modified boot image and replaces it with the one that it had backed up at the time SuperSU was installed. It's not a factory reset but, a restoration of the boot scripts it had modified.

The only thing that I can think of that may be affected by this is if any modifications was made to the boot file while the SuperSU was installed.

For example, if you had made a modification to the boot scripts for a permanent Permissive Mode of your SELinux State. Some individuals do make this "manual/flashed" modification.

If you truly didn't, or can't remember if you did (which everyone should be taking note of these types of modifications anyways) modify your boot image, then the only way to know is to select "Yes" for that option.

If you remove SuperSU without restoring the boot image, you will end up with SuperSU Removed/Uninstalled but, SuperSU will still reside within the Boot Image.

This may/may not result in an issue. I couldn't state one way or another...

Good Luck with your decision! :)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my SM-G900V device.
[SuperSU] Fif_:
If you restore the correct stock boot image, you shouldn't lose any data, correct.

Because things may still go wrong, even when you do everything right, you should still do that backup and copy it offline.
[SuperSU] alexus96:
Thank you all guys! I solved just using SuperSU without losing data, just a simple reboot!