yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] Jole7:
I use f2fs for a long time arter97 is absolutely right that is faster in everything also in synthetic benchmarks the phone get's crazy scores 165k and more easily with an old rom from July. Now you think Ext4 is better? Maybe it's your's opinion ok cool with that.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] v7:
Yes.

__

v7

XDA Assist
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] atoyu:
hi, i cant see this in my sim card setting, will volte option appear when detect the provider support phone model??
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] v7:
You should see 'Enhanced 4G LTE Mode' in Sim settings if your carrier supports it.

__

v7

XDA Assist
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] crazykas:
[MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION] Thanks alot for this fantastic ROM..Everything worked perfect..:good:. I know this has nothing to do with this ROM or any other CM based ROMs, thing is camera performance is not good.. Of cause is is good..But photo quality, focusing,exposure problems are there.. That's why im returning to OOS. But then again anyone who doesn't care much about camera, this is the best ROM i've seen so far..:good:
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] vyp54:
I'm not a fan of CM on OP3 at the moment. They are, allegedly, improving the camera at the moment so we'll see. Once the camera is on par with OOS I just might switch on arter's CM.

I remember [MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION] from the S3 section long ago. Glad too see you in the OP3 section now. I wish you all the luck and as less bugs as possible.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] Giocarro:
Apologize if this is a silly question, but why this ROM requires SuperSU instead of using the CM built-in root?

Thanks and keep up the good work!
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] ShotByMeir:
Camera is actually pretty good... Just try the different modes :)
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] laupuy:
Read OP:

/*info/*

... Builds are "user" builds. Meaning it's more optimized than a "userdebug" build, but lacks root access. If you need root access, flash SuperSU upon installation.

;)
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] IronicChloride:
What's the benefit of formatting /system to f2fs? I always thought f2fs only had the advantage in write speed (I remember some benchmarks showing ext4 outperforming in reads) and so I would only use it for data and cache
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] proag:
That's right. The biggest difference between ext4 and f2fs is on write speed and since /system is read-only, it doesn't make much sense to format it to f2fs.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] nadejo:
I hope you know f2fs is faster in read. And system also writes stuff. That option in twrp system read only is something completely different
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] IronicChloride:
Source? Not trying to call you out or anything, just want to do some research since I'm interested to see how f2fs has developed

Edit: nvm found some phoronix benchmarks that back up what you're saying
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] arter97:
lol that's deep xD
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] arter97:
f2fs' format helps both read and write.

The difference in write is bigger since f2fs has lazy, conservative sync policy compared to ext4.

The only reason that Google, CM is not switching to f2fs on /system is

due to OTA tools not supporting it properly(afaik).

I would recommend users to switch to f2fs on /system too

if you're sticking with my kernel.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] camdadeye291:
[MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION] I can also report that calls over Bluetooth are not working correctly, they can't hear me I can't hear them.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] kickassdave:
The benchmarks I read show a decrease in sequential read performance which surely directly affects system performance since you write that sequentially at the point of writing a new /system partition (flashing a new ROM)?
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] IronicChloride:
Phoronix 3.19 benchmarks give a slight edge to f2fs in random and sequential reads. There was one benchmark of 4.* that showed f2fs crushing ext4 in reads. All the xda benchmarks of f2fs are kinda old and I guess the filesystem has matured since then. And it's always outperformed in writes by a mile so flashing a new ROM shouldn't suffer at all.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] proag:
System is mounted read-only most of the time, just do some research.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] arter97:
There are no benchmarks that regular users can read/conduct-themselves that represents our OnePlus 3 kernel.

If you rely on something like AnTuTu or other Play Store's storage benchmark -

there are too many variables that it can affect benchmark.

(Apps like AnTuTu doesn't even require root during the benchmark. That alone means it's inaccurate.)

If you're reading some ext4 vs f2fs benchmark conducted from some Linux forum(e.g. Phoronix) -

Good for you for searching something more accurate, but I should remind you that ext4 on our kernel is 3.18, and f2fs on our kernel is 4.7(in my kernel case, hybridly merged from 4.8). There are no benchmarks that compares those two directly head-to-head.

I won't be doing benchmark myself as I'm already confident that f2fs will outperform ext4 in most scenarios.

If you'd like to get a little bit more juice from your storage performance, switch to f2fs.

If you want to avoid headaches, stick with ext4.

If you're a noob, go Google how to switch to f2fs.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] proag:
It still does not make much sense to me.

I just don't see the point in switching to /system f2fs if there is no proof that it's significantly faster.

Also, you are saying that people should decrypt their phones in order to get better performance, this is simply not true.

Take a look at this: http://xdaforums.com/oneplus-3/how-to/encrypted-vs-unencrypted-oneplus-3-t3409828

The only difference in speed between encrypted devices and unencrypted would be in boot up time, since you need to the storage, enter the key, etc. And I can understand that encryption may seem useless since Qualcomm chipsets have many vulnerabilites, though I still find it better to keep your device encrypted.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] IronicChloride:
Is there any way to disable the fingerprint sensor when prox sensor is covered? I'm about to switch to this ROM but without OOS pocket mode I always get taken to wakelock city when the phone is in my pocket.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] RohanAJoshi:
[MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION] : sorry for repeating this.

Any words for this ?

Really needed for me and only this to remains fix in cm.

As you are experienced dev, m asking you.

For most of users, this doesn't concern at all.

.

Between I m your fan since galaxy s3 :)

.

Edit : just found new commit from aospa, maybe for this bug.

https://github.com/AOSPA/android_de...mmit/001784c53a8df48d207ed6c1ef97e5f808f75014
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] nazerro:
If i make nandroid backup of all partitions then format it to f2fs and restore the nandroid, will it work?

Or maybe it will revert back to ext4? Copying all internal storage contents to pc manually is lil bit frustrating and sometimes it fails before it's completely done, and i don't know where to continue copying from the last file copied.

Or maybe i should zip all internal storage contents first, move to pc, and unzip it back after f2fs formatting?

Please anyone share me your tricks in backing up sdcard contents. Thanks in advance
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] IronicChloride:
99% sure it will just format back to ext4 since you're restoring the whole partition
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] mkr2511:
i think you have to check the rm-rf box in twrp settings. it wont revert back to ext4 when u restore. have read somewhere in oneplus forums.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] _Man0waR_:
Well, encryption certainly slows down the system, nothing is free, however it's not really noticeable on daily use. Of course if your 'threat' is the NSA, encryption probably won't help you much. They will get access to your data if they really want to. However, if you are trying to protect yourself when your phone gets lost or stolen, like most people I suppose, encryption is great, the FP and a strong password should keep you safe. The power of Android is that you can do almost whatever you want with your phone, it's all about choices. I'm glad that roms and kernels developers propose us all those great options to play and experiment with. The most important thing is to understand what are the implications when you tweak some settings, disable or enable some features. People want a phone that is fast, with no battery drain at all and secure, unfortunately you can't have everything at the same time.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] arter97:
My point is, if f2fs is faster even in a minor way, it'll be worth it for performance enthusiasts.

In the history of computing, encryption always slowed downed the performance and ate more CPU cycles.

I don't expect OnePlus 3 to suddenly & magically fix it.

Attempts for "minimizing" overheads were made, not "neutralizing" it, even on x86.

The fact that it uses dm-verity and fs/crypto means it'll have overheads.

Not much difference for the real world usage? Good thing that overhead is minimum.

But I really have a hard time figuring out that FDE(Full-Disk-Encryption) makes sense for those who have

1. Installed a custom ROM(that doesn't use release-keys)/kernel

2. Installed SuperSU

Same goes for permissive SELinux and insecure ADB(which both are present in my kernel).

You shouldn't be even looking at cusrom ROMs/kernels if you want security.

Heck, you shouldn't be even getting an Android phone where FRP(Factory-Reset-Protection) can be easily workarounded even with something like Knox.

It's like having multiple firewalls on the front door while the back door is wide open with no obstacles.

I would have loved to disable SELinux too, but Android these days is not friendly to that environment(buggy).
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] ritchiedrama:
I like you.

This is why I use your ROM & Kernel!

:D

I do have a question though, on OOS, and any custom ROM - i did have LTE/4G before, now I don't (in my area) but if I go somewhere else I do, right now it ddrops back to 3G all thee time.

Some people have suspected they changed the radio/modem in an update and that's why, and the signal got weaker or something, is there a way you can check this? (i'm a noob at this stuff)

and is there a reason I get worse reception on CM mods/any other ROM than OOS? Like for example In battery I can see the sstrength of the reception in OOS its always green, in CM it's green/orange/yellow/red etc.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] proag:
I don't necessarily agree with that FDE doesn't make sense when someone has installed a custom ROM or kernel.

99% of ROMs and 100% of kernels are fully open source and one is able to compile them from provided source. I would even say that custom ROMs provide more security than ROMs phones come pre-installed with since they aren't open source and you can't verify any security features or whatever.

And SuperSU, yeah, it still bugs me that the most popular SU patch for Android is proprietary, it could have horrible consequences to be honest.

But again, root access included in official CyanogenMod builds and other userdebug builds is open fully open source.

I guess that SELinux has been part of Android for a long time and SELinux is basically the main security feature of Android.

I would like to know why you would've loved to disable SELinux.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] camdadeye291:
Hey [MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION], sorry to interrupt your argument with [MENTION=7366950]proag[/MENTION] but I'd like to offer some feedback that could potentially improve an otherwise flawless ROM. [MENTION=2855103]hunhool[/MENTION], [MENTION=2820983]JakobSkov[/MENTION] and myself have all reported issues with Bluetooth and I would like to make sure you are aware of the problem. Thanks for your efforts, this ROM has the best battery life of any ROM I have used so far, and I have tested most of them, many blessings, keep up the good work. Peace
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] arter97:
SELinux is a pain in the arse.

Many developers just disable it to make their life easier.

And permissive SELinux is simply standing there consuming RAM and causing overheads.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] JumboMan:
I don't understand your last sentence.

is permissive selinux causes overheads ?

not heard before.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] calvinistmac:
Long and short of it all, it's causing performance decreases.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] arter97:
Regardless of SELinux's state(both enforcing and permissive), it causes overhead.

It's basically hooked up to every I/O calls.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] kentexcitebot:
Pardon my ignorance, but when I saw this, I thought about these threads:

http://xdaforums.com/xperia-z1/orig-development/tomoyo-kernel-slimkat-dirty-unicorn-t2940314

http://xdaforums.com/xperia-z1/orig-development/rom-lollipop-resurection-remixed-t3040401

Tl;dr, he removed SELinux and used Tomoyo Security.

Any thoughts?
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] arter97:
That would be doable in 2014, yes.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] nazerro:
Great.. Means that i can do this in the easy way.. Anyway, do you guys change to f2fs on system, data, and cache, or just data and cache?
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] JumboMan:
I changed cache and data partition to f2fs (no need of changing system partition to f2fs).

About performance comparison between ext4 and f2fs ,it may be very minimal so that i can't tell any difference
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] LELBOT:
[MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION]

just flashing ur rom and kernel

f2fs is supported for all system, data and cache or

only data and cache as system is 99% read only.

tell me which partition i should convert to f2fs?

---------- Post added at 10:50 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:24 AM ----------

ok so i will go for data and cache only
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] JumboMan:
Imp note - backup all your apps and internal storage before formating data to f2fs
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] jvybihal:
I have a question, that I hope is not too much offtopic. In location settings I have Qualcomm IZat (http://i.imgur.com/CCuItNI.png), that is something that counght my eye, because I believe it was not there in official CM13 builds. My question is: Is that some enhancement in this CM build, or official has it too, and it just does not show it in location settings?

And a note to this ROM: It's really great and I am very satisfied with it. I really appreciate your work [MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION] and I am really glad for user builds, it lets me to use banking apps without any hassle. f2fs works like charm (system/data/cache). Can not comment on the bluetooth problems others mentioned, since I do not use it. Looking forwards for the next builds. J.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] arter97:
New build is up.

No kernel update is needed.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] ritchiedrama:
What is the correct way to update? Like what steps? Download zip boot to twrp and just install over then wipe cache/dalvik?
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] camdadeye291:
What changes have you made in the new build brother, thanks in advance. Many blessings
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] calvinistmac:
I can confirm that this is the correct method. Just download the zip (you'll have to do it on your PC or Mac because the site isn't working on mobile), copy the file over to your phone and boot into TWRP, then dirty flash and wipe cache/dalvik then reboot. I checked all functions. Kernel isn't overwritten and root is intact. All beautiful things!
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] kenn7:
you can use uc browser from phone and it would work
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] isoladisegnata:
Someone say that there are lags on latest build..who confirm this please
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] camdadeye291:
Can anyone confirm that Bluetooth is working in the latest build? [MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION]

Thanks in advance, peace
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] clone217:
Lag

No lag for me :D
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] stryker09:
Is nobody else getting Setup Wizard FCs when clean flashing? I searched a few threads and have tried a number of things each suggested but to no avail.. :/

Ideas?
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] camdadeye291:
Do you know how to get around this [MENTION=4183606]stryker09[/MENTION]??

In TWRP mount system then go to File Manager under the Advanced button.

Navigate to system> priv-app>

delete setup wizard then reboot

this has worked for me everytime
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] Hw4ng3r:
It roughly translates to something like this:

"Very nice to see you here/a pleasant surprise to see you here [MENTION=4898097]arter97[/MENTION]. Cant wait to flash this rom. Thank you very much!"
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] Konskl:
is this rom that fast as others are saying? i know that might sound a stupid question but i'm looking for the very best performance i can get from the phone and because is quite a hassle to format to f2fs data cache and system.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] ShotByMeir:
Smoothest build I've experienced of CM13 for the OP3 and I have tried both ext4 and f2fs. I can't really tell the difference but both are extremely smooth and fast :)
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] Schrotty35:
Never have say this here on latest build. Are you dreaming?
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] calvinistmac:
No lag here either
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] clone217:
I have tryied, RR,ACIP,H20,Freedom .Ect. I came back to rom . battery friendly , Simple , and works with very little problems.
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] Schrotty35:
Which little problems?
[OnePlus 3 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, & Other Devel] clone217:
Someone mentioned Bluetooth and WiFi issues on pervious build not for me
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] edarick:
Latest news for upcoming cm13.0 for g530 is ready, zim555 release the changelog/changes of CM13.0 builds on its github many bugs is needed to fix right now. For now just wait the official release.

Changes:

Latest Commits:

https://github.com/ZIM555/android_device_samsung_fortuna3g/commits/cm-13.0

So wait for the upload release of file in jenkins dashboard.

Ty@zim555
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] Play4NoobWin:
G531H :confused: or G530H
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] abooooood:
What about 530H
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] phs001:
That's it A Custom for the G531H, congratulations to everyone who worked on it I thank much we looked for a long time

---------- Post added at 03:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:07 PM ----------

I left when?
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] doesntexits:
Heh, that device tree is for G530H, not G531H

Btw, I'm building CM13 for G531H now, as seen I've posted a screenshot after very first booted CM for G531H (check G531H CM12.1 thread)
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] phs001:
When will make available for download?
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] doesntexits:
Single rule: NO ETAs. Don't let anyone see this question again
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] YottaBiter:
What's the difference between these two models?
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] phs001:
Apologies , I'll wait !
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] doesntexits:
G530H has SD 410 (msm8216 because it isn't 4G variant, but same 64bit as msm8916), and G531 has Spreadtrum SC7730SE (32bit SoC)

Else things are the same, 8MP rear cam, 8GB storage, 1G RAM, and blah blah blah
[Galaxy Grand Prime General] mamadrahimi8:
531h Or 530h????

فرستاده شده از SM-G531Hِ من با Tapatalk
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] dpmisk:
Now this is what I'm wondering.

How come in eBay you search for the HTC TyTN II and its roughly $800.

But if you search AT&T 8925 Tilt its roughly $500.

Now in my case i'm with T-Mobile and of course interested in this phone. Would their be any advantages with either Phone I choose?

This would help out alot, thanks!
[Tilt, TyTN II, MDA Vario III General] greg3d:
The TyTN II, has the front facing camera, and is unlocked to any service provider. The Tilt has no front facing camera, has a ton of AT&T bloatware, does not come with the TomTom Navigator taster software, and has a silver keypad on the keyboard.

Otherwise, same phone. You can always pick up the Tilt, and flash the HTC TyTN II ROM on it. So aside from the front camera, and the keyboard color, you'll have a TyTN II equivalent, and some money in your pocket.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Striker977:
hellow i tried changing dpi on build prop from 480 to 420 everything works fine except keyboard is to big are their any possible fix so that the keyboard can fit the screen ?
[Samsung Galaxy J7 Questions & Answers] Music Rockz:
Hello folks,

How to capture RAW (.DNG) images in Samsung Galaxy J700F as it is stated in Specifications???

I tried "Manual Camera" but it resulted as "Incompatiblility".

Any suggestions???

Thanks.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] Soapy!:
Just out of curiosity, could MIUI V7 be ported for our devices?
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] t_adams:
Have you tried MIUI? It's almost the same kind of ui as emui. I don't see any point on running that Rom on this device.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] Soapy!:
Hardly. It has of a resemblance to FlymeOS, and by it, I mean EMUI.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] anak1n:
MIUI is much more stable and not so laggy as EMUI.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] mooms:
They are equally crappy IMO.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] Soapy!:
Okay.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] ClayYoung:
Personally, with any device that I've used MIUI on, it was the fastest ROM available and was borderline miraculous.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] PalakMi:
It can be ported, the only missing thing is someone to port it :)
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] Soapy!:
Exactly, it would be much appreciated if someone could do it.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] PalakMi:
I hope someone see this and start working on it :)
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] Suriteka:
That could be awesome. I would love to try, but I don't know how compile/build a rom. ?
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] Soapy!:
Someone on another thread said that they've found a ported MIUI ROM (from the Redmi Note 3) for our device. I mean, we already have someone on Flyme, so I just have to ask: Why not MIUI?
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] PalakMi:
That's the same question I ask, MIUI is way better than flume.....why porting it rather than MIUI?!
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] zinko_pt:
Knowing the history about Miui, being a former supporter for Miui, I say "avoid it at all costs".

Take in consideration:

1 - Stable global releases are far from stable apart from a very few devices

2- Weekly releases are far from stable apart from a very few devices

3- Stable means ALL hardware features enabled and no major bugs like FCs, overheat, battery drain, bootloops, etc. Things we don´t get in Huawei but very much present in Xiaomi.

4- If Miui stable is not stable, imagine a port.
[Honor 5X Questions & Answers] Soapy!:
It's worth a shot.