yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Thanks :o

Yes, I want to try to shoot another area of the sky but I don't have a tripod to hold the phone yet. I actually just put the phone on a car's roof :D Yeah it's artisanal :D

But I'm considering buying a trepod, the photography interest me more and more, and I would be able to shoot the sky not only vertically ! And other landscapes ^^
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Saad Ali:
Ohh wow, oh wow.

---------- Post added at 08:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:57 PM ----------

Woderfull, more please. Dessert at night? or am I asking too much?
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Thanks :)

What do you mean by "dessert at night" ? :confused:
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Saad Ali:
Not dessert as it's not practical. But a barren land at night with moon light being the only light source. Or any place with only moon light.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Okay, I will see what I can do :)
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
I could process another picture I took yesterday, it looks pretty awesome, it's different as the 2 previouses one.

Same parameters : ISO 800, 30s exposure, and Focus Infinite.

Etape 1 : An original RAW picture I used :

[IMG="original picture"]http://nsa38.casimages.com/img/2016/08/08/160808020748912150.jpg[/IMG]

Etape 2 : Stacking (noise reduction, 3 pictures)

[IMG="stacked"]http://nsa37.casimages.com/img/2016/08/08/160808020920979573.jpg[/IMG]

The stacking is weird at the bottom of the picture... But it's not very annoying

Etape 3 : Post-processing -> final result:

[IMG="awesome result"]http://nsa38.casimages.com/img/2016/08/08/160808020957682139.jpg[/IMG]
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] dmeerpa:
Sorry, but for me the photo quality is null.

The RAW photos are missing a lot of colors and are unacceptable and useless unless I calibrate the camera with the aid of X-rite Color passport in Lightroom, then the RAW photos are OK.

The JPEG photos have to much compression witch add undesired artifacts even at ISO 100.

Have a look at my comparison between RAW, RAW with camera calibration and JPEG over here.

OK its still a smartphone camera, but coming from an Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge its a big difference.

For example have a look at this shot taken with my Samsung, sharpness is even amassing on my 4K monitor.

Compared with this shots taken with the One+ 3 at ISO100 where you can see some kind of blur.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] superiscch:
It is not useful to use a high iso on long exposure... Only giving a useless grain.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
The last one

This one is the last photo of my latest (and first btw :cyclops: ) milky way shooting.

Same parameters as usual (ISO 800, 30s exposure) and stacked with only 2 photos :rolleyes:

[IMG="Milky Way"]http://nsa37.casimages.com/img/2016/08/08/160808031458674968.jpg[/IMG]
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] _Man0waR_:
A quick test from last night. Only 4 pics stacked and some processing with photoshop.

---------- Post added at 03:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:31 PM ----------

Don't forget to set a camera timer, like 10s before starting the capture. No need to add some shaking when pressing the shutter button.

---------- Post added at 04:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:44 PM ----------

The Galaxy S6 has certainly a better camera, it's not a surprise. But please don't compare pictures in daylight with night sky long exposures. I know there's a lot noise, far too much, stacking helps but can't make miracles. (Even if it can improve images a lot).

Regarding the colors, they need to be adjusted in the processing anyway, can you tell me what is the colour of the milky way ?

I would love though if you could take some similar pictures of the night sky with your S6 to compare with the OP3.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Beautiful :fingers-crossed:

Having a foreground really helps to get a better photo !

I like the way you processed it !

Yes you're right, I forgot :rolleyes:
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] _Man0waR_:
Thanks, well the foreground is blurry due to the stacking, it was a quick test though. I could use a mask to fix that. There's still a lot of noise, next time I will try with more images, 20 for example.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
I can't use a lot of images to stack, because when I auto-align the layers, some of them are not aligned everywhere (for example see my latest photo, you will see blur at the top), and it messes up the result...

Do you know how to do to have a clean sky whithout the blurry effect ? :confused:

Do you follow exactly these steps ? http://www.lonelyspeck.com/stacking-noise-reduction/
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] _Man0waR_:
Nope, I'm using DeepSkyStacker with default settings. I did not try the tutorial in the video. DSS should give you better results as it can detect the stars and use them for alignment. (You probably need to read/find some tutorials to understand the basic procedure, there are some on youtube).

Also like on many lenses the images is really sharp only at the center of the field, so it's normal to have some distortion and blur near the edges.

Make sure you use version 3.3.4, I had weird colors with DSS 3.3.2. (Probably something related to OP3 raw (DNG) format).

I have a bit of experience with astrophotography but not that much. I'm sure the processing could be improved.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Btw, what settings did you use on the camera, and did you change DeepSkyStacker's settings (like the star detection (10%) or the noise filter) ? Or you just let them

all

to default ?

I tried to stack my images with it, but the result isn't very convincing... Pretty noisy and really dark... Photoshop's method works better, so I thing my DeepSkyStacker's settings aren't good (I changed them according to a tutorial)...
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] _Man0waR_:
Well, I suggest you to look at some astrophotography tutorials. It's normal that the images are really dark, you need to 'stretch' them. You can do it using photoshop 'curves'.

Make sure you are using DSS 3.3.4.

Regarding my settings on the camera, nothing special. Manual mode, 30s exposures, iso (between 800 and 1600).
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Le_Zouave:
Coming from a DSLR that have its own proprietary raw format and DNG (Pentax K10) you get it wrong about raw format. DNG is a standardized raw format, not a lossless picture format.

All raw image have to be processed, they all look bad without processing but don't have compression artifact. It's like old way of processing film. RAW format is not just getting rid of compression artifact.

You have a calibrated monitor so that's strange you don't know that. The default settings in Lightroom give good result. I like photo ninja too (same editor than noise ninja) but need more effort.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] EMJI79:
Cannot guess which shots were taken with Samsung and which with OnePlus 3, the links are the same.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] dmeerpa:
Where do I mention that RAW shouldn't be processed.

Secund, Digital Negative (DNG) is a patented, open, non-free lossless raw image format written by Adobe used for digital photography. So yes it is a lossless picture format and yes since version 1.4 also lossy.

A camera raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor.

Normally, the image is processed by a raw converter in a wide-gamut internal colorspace where precise adjustments can be made before conversion to a "positive" file format such as JPEG for storage, printing, or further manipulation. This often encodes the image in a device-dependent colorspace.

In Lightroom and Photoshop I'm using ProPhoto RGB color space. The DNG files from the OnePlus 3 comes with an embedded profile. And that's the mean issue. That embedded profile (Camera profile or also called for Camera details) is bad, very bad. It's the cause of the color loss. That's the only one I need to change to have a good photo with the OnePlus 3.

Another explication could be, that the embedded profile that Lightroom sees, does not exist or has default values that does not apply for the OnePlus 3 camera. But then the question is, how does the OnePlus 3 do the RAW conversion to JPEG without camera details ....

---------- Post added at 09:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 AM ----------

Don't now how I ended up with twice the same link.

Here are the pictures taken with the OnePlus 3
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Le_Zouave:
A raw without the camera information will always have false color. For example in Irfan view if you open the dng, you will briefly see the raw without the camera information and on op3 it's quite red. And from all dslr I have, the unprocessed picture with correctly color look all quite bland, with low contrast.

Old negative film has to be processed, it's not like a diapositive. The digital negative in the same way have to be processed and the standard "auto tune" button in lightroom will give good result after you hit the export button.

Envoyé de mon ONEPLUS A3003 en utilisant Tapatalk
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Two more from last night

Shooting star

[IMG="Shooting star"]http://nsa38.casimages.com/img/2016/08/13/160813024329864580.jpg[/IMG]

Milky Way

[IMG="Milky Way"]http://nsa38.casimages.com/img/2016/08/13/160813024355999240.jpg[/IMG]
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] hurray:
How much photos do you stacked to get these results?

I find them very good. :)

Did you use the original OP3-Cam?
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
I didn't stack any photo for the shooting star photo :D

For the second one, I stacked around 10 photos :o

Thanks :)
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] hurray:
Thanks! 10 photos is much. So I think it's time for a little tripod for the op3.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Yeah, I just bought a tripod, I couldn't before ^^

I bought the JOBY Griptight Gorillapod on Amazon yesterday, I just lay it on a table and it works pretty good!

These photos were my firsts taken with this Tripod ^^
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] alex.inthi:
With the help of this guide I was able to capture this from my OnePlus 3 :-p
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] LELBOT:
well bruh, this pic is clicked by "Starts With A Bang" by Forbes Magazine Photographer.

U shouldnt have posted the link directly - "http://blogs-images.forbes.com/startswithabang/files/2016/01/Milky_Way_at_Concordia_Camp_Karakoram_Range_Pakistan-1200x800.jpg" :D:D:D
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] alex.inthi:
Haha :-p
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] psiLion:
I'm absolutely amazed by this camera under low light conditions. This is Helsinki at night and i never expected to get a picture with this less noise.

Edit: sadly the picture got compressed like hell by the xda board
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] EMJI79:
You've been using tripod?
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] hasenbein1966:
With tripod or another method of holding the Oneplus 3 absolutely still it's of course no problem to get very good photos in very dark conditions.

Just use manual mode, medium low ISO, very long exposure. Done.

But that doesn't say anything meaningful about the OP3's camera and low light capabilities, because with tripod + long exposure you can get good low light photos on ANY recent phone.

The crucial criterion is whether one can shoot free-handedly in low light, with short exposure (so that the pictures don't get blurry) and without resulting graininess (i.e. with sufficiently low ISO).

And in this respect the OP3 simply isn't top notch and is eaten for breakfast by the S7.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] EMJI79:
Even professionals use tripod
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] hasenbein1966:
Yes, of course, but that wasn't my point.

Read (and watch on YouTube) a number of smartphone camera reviews and comparisons. Then you'll probably know what I mean.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Hey, here is my latest photo, and it's my favourite one. I used this time ISO 640 instead of 800.

[IMG="Milky Way"]http://nsa37.casimages.com/img/2016/08/25/160825010025292669.jpg[/IMG]
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] EMJI79:
The photo of the post I was replying to wouldn't be so clear even on an S7 and maybe a DSLR without a tripod.

And I have seen a lot of videos on YouTube concerning S7 and many others.

Just found that on Pinterest:

http://www.boostyourphotography.com/2014/03/shutter.html?m=1

The second picture advises "Consider a tripod" from 1/15 of a second exposure time.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] hurray:
I must make something wrong. I also buyed a tripod and shoot 6 photos with 10 seconds exposure at ISO800. Every photo is okay but the result after stacking with DeepSkyStacker is not so good.

I think I have to play a little bit around with all options DeepSkyStacker is offering.

The most curious thing is that the photos are shown upside down and all colors are wrong. It seems also that DeepSkyStacker is not able to read the informations like exposure times from the .dng-files.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] _Man0waR_:
Did you try the latest version 3.3.4 ?

http://deepskystacker.free.fr/download/DeepSkyStacker334.rar
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] hurray:
Yes. After I looked a long time where to get I finally found and use the version 3.3.4. With 3.3.2 the results are even more worse. :D

Thanks for the link! I think this would be helpful for other readers of this thread.

I just shoot 6 new pictures (ISO 800, 10 sec. exposure) which I will try to stack again the next days. This time I also shoot one "dark frame" to get a better noise-detection.

I will see how it's going on. There are so many options to play with... I just read that I am able to force the values for exposure and ISO in the context menu of the photos. Maybe this will help.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Samsagax:
Un a club, with almost no light. ISO 32000. 1 full second exposure. I'm impressed by this phone's camera
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] tennu123:
What's the longest possible shutter speed on OP3?
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] MateuszMic:
30 seconds.

Wysłane z OnePlus 3
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] v7:
Tried my luck :)

__

v7

Forum Moderator
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] BlueStar92:
Does anyone know how to do intervalometer with long exposure? As far as I know camera fv5 doesn't support OnePlus 3 for this yet. And I think it is not possible to set automated volume key input events (to trigger shutter button) in tasker without root.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] otonieru:
just want to let you all know that our phone is capable of capturing these kind of images : (am just using JPEG btw)

mostly on OOS cam, and bacon cam
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] BlueStar92:
Hi, where did you take this photo? It doesn't look like there is any light pollution. Did you do image stacking?
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Hi,

I took this photo in France, in a little village :)

There is no big city around ^^

Yes, I did image stacking :)
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] BlueStar92:
Cool! I can see there is milky way in the photo? Is that possible to capture milky way with the phone even when we can't see it with naked eyes?
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Vayper_fr:
Yes, shooting the Milky Way was my goal :)

Search my posts in this thread and you will see that in all of my photos, you can see the Milky Way :)

Yes, because the sensor is more sensible than your eyes ^^
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] peshellas:
This is my 1st and only milky way photo with the OnePlus 3. Sorry for instagram low quality, but with my data formated when i changed to f2fs, i no longer have my raw :crying:

https://www.instagram.com/p/BImvYkIjpjB/
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Fl0ppik:
Forgive me that post, i just want to share my photo from previous nubia x6. I slightly sad, that we cannot take such art photo from oneplus 3.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] sharath_babu:
Stacking?? Manual mode settings used??
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] peshellas:
No stacking, manual mode (dont remember my settings) i used 30 seconds shutter and 100-400 ISO and I also tried higher iso and lower shutter speed that day. I just don't remember what was used on this one. After that i edited the RAW and this beauty came out ;)
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] sharath_babu:
But shutter speed more than 3sec leave you with start trail,how come you used 30sec with such a standstill pic.
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] peshellas:
I told you i experimented with other settings, higher isos and faster shutter speed. I just lost my original file when I switched to f2fs, so i cant check. Also milky way was visible to the naked eye that night on the beach and haf zero city lights. This one must be with high iso and a speed of 4-8 max
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Teehoom Tsao:
Snapseed should be the best app
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Dieppy:
Hope I'm not too late to the party.

Btw all was taken in manual mode and edit (a little) with Adobe Lightroom :)
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] sharath_babu:
really cool man.

any tips for us?

specially for low light photography!
[OnePlus 3 Guides, News, & Discussion] Dieppy:
Thanks for your feedback!

Sincerely I don't know what to say.. My advice is: try again and again. After reading this I went out and tested some settings.

https://www.xda-developers.com/usin...-quality-and-versatility-of-your-photography/
[XDA Assist] m0ns7ers:
when i try to install xposed framework in bluestacks

root fails

someone plz help me in solving this problem

so i can install xposed installer in blue stacks

Thank yOU
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] andgtr08:
Hello, guys! I was wondering if someone could send me the APK file Launcher used on new Moto Z or Z Force. I would really like to test the new launcher from Motorola. Thanks!
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] Junior Passos:
Nothing interesting.

I prefer the Google Now Launcher.
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] andgtr08:
Oh thanks, man! It's just for testing
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] Luny Lennon:
It Work On Moto X Pure .. Thanks ..
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] dnyogesh:
Moto apk (4th gen devices)

I am requesting you to please update Moto Display/ Moto Voice/ Moto Actions / Moto apps in Moto z / Z play / G4 PLus.

I was intrested to try the new moto display in my pure edition so please upload it asap.

Thank you in advance
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] juliospinoza:
moto display is exactly the same as my beloved Moto X 2014; moto voice is WORST than the previous versions, I really miss "what's up" and "find my device", so not worth to upgrade; moto actions are the same as Moto X, the only difference is that now you can use your phone with one hand just sliding up from the navigation bar. the moto mods are the only big difference here. I know i am not helping at anything, just want it to inform you about the "differences"
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] jdawg334:
It looks like the Motorola Z launcher is almost the exact same launcher as Google Now. Only differences I see are Google now has no Badge count numbers on email/Messenger icons, the calendar icon doesn't show the date, and of course swiping left to right from home screen goes to Google now
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] dnyogesh:
I am looking for moto display app in moto 4th gen mobiles. Trying doesn't hurt just for my statifaction. Even if it is not compatible but a big issue.

I'm not sure why Lenovo moto if not interested to give update to Lenovo Motorola mobile:( .

hoping that you will attach the apks. and waiting for you
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] stewarta13wsb:
Please excuse my newbie question.... this APK you are talking about for Moto launcher, would this restore my new Moto Z back to the way it was before Google Now destroyed it and I had to cover everything up with Novo?
[Moto Z Questions & Answers] GibMcFragger:
It's basically exactly the same, minus the persistent search bar.
[Nook HD, HD+ Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] snovvman:
I picked up an HD+ to setup for mom to use. Although I have plenty of experience with other devices, I am learning that HD+ is a bit unique in how it upgrades.

This leads to some questions. The HD+ currently has TWRP and CM12.1 installed.

1) To upgrade TWRP to a newer build (I found a 3.0.1.0 zip), is it as simple as flashing the zip?

2) To upgrade from CM12.1 to a new AOSP MM build, is it as simple as wipe, flashing the zip, and then GApps in TWRP?

3) Related to #2 above, I presume GApps is needed for AOSP builds? The standard GApps will work?

4) In terms of stability and reliability, how is AOSP compared to CM13?

Thanks.
[Nook HD, HD+ Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] snovvman:
Info I found on my questions, in case someone needs it:

1, 2, and 3, Yes, Yes, and Yes. A lot of info in this thread:

http://xdaforums.com/nook-hd/development/marshmallow-nook-hd-hd-t3239269

For Gapps, look at post #1063

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=67624159&postcount=1063

For 4, both AOSP and CM13 seem to have issues, but I most seem to report that AOSP is a bit more snappy.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] XxFatiHxX:
How can i add my button in any android app?

I'd like to add my button in S Launcher.

Help me pls. Thx
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Scarface47:
Did you find any clue?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] XxFatiHxX:
No.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] ww15:
I have a rooted S4 that was originally on MDK. I have gone through a few ROMs over the years. I recently tried CM12 (latest snapshot) and my phone/BT radios only worked about half of the time. I tried to upgrade to CM12 and the radios did not work at all. Restored backup (TWRP) of CM 12 and those radios still don't work.

What do I need to do? Flash firmware/baseband (showing GOC1 now)? I can't seem to find the right file. Hopefully its something I can flash with TWRP.

Thanks for the advice.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] tshelby73:
I would try flashing back to stock Mdk. But definitely make sure it's Mdk of coarse. Baseband is usually your radio this can be changed without changing bootloader so you can flash that separate.

---------- Post added at 07:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:10 AM ----------

[MODEM][Zip] Modems for Loki'd & Safestrap roms (12/03/2014)

https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?ur...share_tid=2487298&share_fid=3793&share_type=t
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] ww15:
Thanks. I didnt see GOC1 on the linked list so I wasnt sure if I could flash another one. I had gotten the phone to work on/off same as before by reflashing CM12 and restoring backups a few times. I flashed the MDK files today and everything is working now, and hopefully it lasts. Trying to bridge to Note 7 release (potentially).
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] turner5770:
I have issues too with the radio, especially switching between towers, going in and out of service..I'm not clear on what zips to flash from the link. I'm currently running the following.
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] osman34:
if u trip knox samsung will not work

installing custom rom like cm or something else will trip knox

if u want samsung pay dont root or do anything
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TULOA:
I understand that but that wasnt my question.

Trying to find about doing the steps above.

Install official samsung down to rootable firmware then use that root with flashfire. Was told that method could work. However if I can just get root from a downgrade ill be happy.
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Snowby123:
Downgrading could be possible with Odin depending on y your firmware version. You can always try installing the earliest firmware for that particular variant. Worst thing to happen would be a failure of installation. The earliest firmware versions are compatible with pingpongroot , but if the su binaries are detected Samsung pay will fail no matter what