yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] WarriorMax:
Thx T's.. I thought so too ... So basically the advanced doze option under display settings is practically useless in this rom?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Trafalgar Square:
Send me screenshot from the setting.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Megatron007:
I came here to eat my popcorn :D
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
No. Its not about me or somebody. I don't want people to have misinformation. They trust us so we've a responsibility towards them especially if you carry a badge. No?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] :
Thread cleaned

I suggest people stick to their own threads rather than derailing someone elses. If you want to have this disagreement then take it to PM

Regards

Moderation Team
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] fizzingbees:
this is for you and anyone wondering doze working for note 2

1st thing for doze to work your phone must have a motion sensor which note 2 doesnt have and then a required doze software. Thus note 2 from hardware side dont have doze so it wouldnt work as google intended it to work in MM.

2nd via software we can the force the phone to enter doze mode via bypassing motion sensor requirement.

so in note 2 we can force the phone to enter doze via software only. Thus you need apps like force doze or greenify (VIA DUMP feature ) to use doze ,otherwise it doesnt really works on our phone.

when i had MM rom i used force doze+greenify and it worked flawlessly.

i hope that clears the confusion.

bottomline: Note 2 doesnt support doze out of box but with a couple of app you can force the doze on on all MM roms
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Please, for God's sake, don't comment on something about which you've no idea. If you just want to support someone please do it in PM not here.

Thank you !
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] WarriorMax:
Here you go...Also attaching batterystats that shows some Doze activity which I can't understand.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Trafalgar Square:
They isn't the Doze we're talking about.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
i think we may have a new world record in 100 m in the olympics :)

Is this ice breaking enough?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Ivan_Meler:
Okay might want to clear things up over here,So doze really doesnt work as intended it doesnt use sensor instead it is starting doze mode when device is not used for some time And when you wake it up it will stop doze, So no this is not doze as google intended it and no it doesnt use sensor since we dont have sensor that supports significant motion and its more than just an api.. if you really want to find out more about it you can look it up at cyanogenmods gerrit on devices like s3 when someone made commit to enable it.

TL : DR, Doze works but not as intended since we dont really have support for it

Now can we stop this madness ?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Mind sharing name of sensor?

And please don't call a discussion/argument as madness cause neither of the 2 concerned people were mad.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tuskotravan:
Guys pls stop this doze argument you are making thinks better than ever we need you 3. Already trafalgar closed his threads. Pls for us stop this thing.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Don't worry neither I'm gonna threaten "that I'll close this thread" nor I gonna do that. I'm much better than that. :)

Its nothing personal (at least for me) but a purely technical subject that should enrich everyone (with an open mind).
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tuskotravan:
Its nothing personal (at least for me) but a purely technical subject that should enrich everyone (with an open mind).[/QUOTE]

True nicely said
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tuskotravan:
We're not going to ask for ETA's (since banned) but I remember the Sunday two weeks before
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Dav's kid is in hospital.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tuskotravan:
OMG we pray for the kid, he or she will be okay soon. :good:
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Hope he/she will be healthy again soon.....
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] bob_marly:
Hi bro

I hv problem with voice call

When I get calls I can't hear sound

Sry for bad English
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Ivan_Meler:
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/135200/

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/122839/

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/124059/

Happy now?, If you read thru comments you will see this is exactly what i have said.. Also i am sorry to say but you really turned out stubborn in this situation you could search for this yourself on cm's gerrit as i told you but anyway this should put end to it no hard feelings i guess..

also wish the best to dav's kid i remember when my gf ended up in hospital it was one of the reasons why i kinda stopped development cant imagine how many times worst it must be when its your kid thats in the hospital..
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Stubborn ? No. Confident? Yes.

You've your research and I've mine.

Now about commits, I'm sure you have gone through them but will they enable Doze ? Yes and No.

Yes, cause this value will enable Doze in the ROM.

No, device still will not have full Doze cause SMD is not implemented in Sensor HAL. This is the missing piece and unfortunately not documented well by Google. Simple example is you got a 4k TV but still it is not working cause the cable (SMD) connecting it with power supply (Sensor) is missing.

Other option is to completely remove this dependency on SMD and force Doze every time screen is off (Aggressive Doze of Greenify)

And I'm sure that at least you know that SMD API is not a 'hardware' sensor.

You still didn't name the missing sensor.

Anyways , Doze DOES NOT need any other Sensor except Accelerometer. Other sensor maybe used if Accelerometer is not present (every phone after 2012 has one).

See pictures.

Now if Google doesn't understand Doze then I'll be entirely wrong.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
[MENTION=4546136]silentvisitor[/MENTION], please give our sympathy and support to dav.

There is nothing more important in a mans life than his kid, belive me i learned the hard way.

Everything else can wait, dont pay attention to us all and anything else.

But , forgive me to ask, I might have see that you, yourself have some kind of health issue. If i read right i wish you health and strenth my friend
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Ivan_Meler:
thing is to get smd sensor to behave like it should we would have to have low power sensor now low power is really relative term thing is this is 2012 device and compared to todays devices this is not so low power sensor as some are technology moves we might call it low power but by today standards its really not and there is nothing we can do about it
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
All Accelerometers are low power and no significant upgrades have happened to this sensor over last many years. So our sensor is as good as Note 5's. Moreover sensors don't consume so much power as to render a feature unusable.

As I said earlier, SMD API implementation is not documented leading to all confusions and theories.

[MENTION=5554397]logosA[/MENTION]

Thank you friend for your kind wishes. I had a severe spinal injury. Still recovering. Will take few months.

Thanks again :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Ivan_Meler:
You do realise sensor would have to be on the whole time? that would cause battery drain and trust me i have few other devices and note 2's sensor consumes more batery for sensor than new devices with new sensors do
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mad1mystic:
That's traumatic, take care of yourself friend silent visitor.hope u recover soon.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] WarriorMax:
Guys when it comes to battery life, does the default kernel perform better than Agni. I'm currently on Agni Lulzseqactive and getting around 4 Hrs SOT. Is it more than this for people using default kernel?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
So you agree that Doze doesn't need any 'special' hardware ?

Power consumption is no reason for a feature to not work or unable to be implemented.

Can you share/show some data to show that Note 2's Accelerometer consumes more power (though it doesn't matter for Doze)?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
No, agni 4.5.5

I mean they dont get better SOT
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mad1mystic:
I get more than 6 hours of SOT in ag ni. I use battery save profile zzmove governor sync is off overall black theme throught phone black wallpaper screen brightness to default low. Most of user apps greenified. Battery ac charge set to 1500 ma . black wallpaper even in WhatsApp chat .deep darkness is awesome theme with not many bugs.i use 2g for internet if I use Wi-Fi I get more SOT . Sometimes SOT goes to 6.50 or 7 hours if just movies or surfing. I don't play games but I use many social apps . Location is off screen time out 1 min . I use greenify but i don't use aggressive doze it gives me less SOT. with default kernel too I get around 5.30 hours SOT default is smooth too but I like little extra functionality on agni. Hope it helps
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] giomarx:
No one is getting this mesures. I myself , though i have greenify, I dont use agressive doze, because i dont like the reaction of apps when in doze(i think they stall)

logosA using K012 with tapatalk
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] WarriorMax:
Wow 7 hrs, thts crazy. :eek: I dont get the smoothness with other govnors tht I get with Lusqzactive.

Which governor does the default kernel have?

[MENTION=5554397]logosA[/MENTION] your deepsleep seems to be amazing. Do you use any other mods or jst greenify?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mad1mystic:
You can check governor in kernel aduitor or any other app. I didn't use default governor much . I use agni zzmove battery save .it's not smoothest but its pretty good with slight lag cos I prefer battery life more than performance. U can try agni non smdk version u can always resort back to default kernel by dirty flashing ROM. This ROM gives one of the best battery life it's very smooth and optimised on default governor . Video on apps is not a prob . TubeMate crashes on RR which was my fav before this but not on this. One of the best ROM I tried.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
i have agni in default settings, i use greenify but not agressive doze, i just install it and leave it in defaults, only root mode change.

But to be honest the battery is new. Same days ago if you remember we where trying to help an new friend ( [MENTION=7649031]TempoRobo[/MENTION] )to install a rom leaving TW. [MENTION=4546136]silentvisitor[/MENTION] mention to take battery out and spin it on a flat surfuse to see if its damaged. I did that for mine and realized that it was spinning like hell !

So i bought a new one and this is why I now have this standbay results( this is one part, the other are rom and settings)

I want to share here something with you people, most of you now i am trying all rom available here. Some times (with the old battery) was stack in bootloops (during first boot, or just reboot) Allthough my old battery is seems good with nice times and descharge prossecces, in that moments it was not enough. With the new battery i never faced again same problems. So keep that in mind next time you face a problem like that.

Also with battery i bought the back cover of the phone, its the original one which have the antena too on it. I, until then was usin sometimes a flip cover for the pnone which i realized that had no antenna

What i find out with that? That many problems with GPS signal lost and BT problems with headsets, vanished after i change it!

So check your covers too, if it has antenna, clean the contacts regularly, it will save you af some problems with reception
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mad1mystic:
Thanks for your valuable feedback logos
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mad1mystic:
I can't see the terminal emulator in developer settings or anywhere else . Can u confirm it silent visitor?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Local terminal appears in the search however it is not present in developer options.... [MENTION=4546136]silentvisitor[/MENTION]
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] mad1mystic:
Yes exactly thank you Vishal.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pnsdhrn:
Sorry dear SV.I came to know about this ROM much late.Immediately on seeing this and knowing that you are the originator,I am downloading this without any doubts about it's performance ability since I have full confidence in you.But as my 64 GB SanDisk Memory card has got corrupted I am not in a position to install this ROM just now.I have already ordered for a new one.Once I get it ,I am going to install this one the same moment.And definitely I shall be giving my appreciation in this thread itself.

My sincere thanks and appreciation for your earnest,hardworking and helping attitude.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Thanks for so much love and support old buddy :)

Looking forward to your experience with the ROM :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] pnsdhrn:
Definitely dear SV...
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Enjoy the rom....

It's a great rom... I think the best out there....

The only one where videos work like a charm in browsers....

Hope the rom stays updated [MENTION=4546136]silentvisitor[/MENTION]

I luv this rom......
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Hope so :(
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] tuskotravan:
:rolleyes::confused:
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
i see we have a small crisies here in XDA.

Is it vacation related or something else that we dont see? Is there anything we can do to help?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] zsandras:
Yes mate maybe the vocation could be the crisis on XDA. In other words I can't explain why so small comments on this wonderful rom theme, but let's think about once someone said "No news is good news" :cool:
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] rajmagi:
Clock at lock screen is halved. Any solution?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Decrease clock font size in Settings > AICP Extras > Lockacreen
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] brokenaxe:
Switched ROMs, but always back to this.. Videos works like a charm. Although sometimes I'll need to kill the mediaserver once in awhile for Camera and videos to work, it is the ROM for me... Netflix works like a charm here. Thanks for providing a stable af ROM for us.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Hard work pays off when users report how happy they are with our ROM :)

Thanks guys for so much love and support [emoji106]

Btw, Amazon and Terminal issues have been noted ;)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
This rom is truly awesome...

Even after one day of heavy usage....

60% battery left......it also shows 2 days left.....

Videos work....

No bugs

Great work [MENTION=5747263]dav888[/MENTION] [MENTION=4546136]silentvisitor[/MENTION]

Also [MENTION=5747263]dav888[/MENTION]

How is your kid....

Pls don't sit in front of your computer until you kid is completely healthy...like 101% healthy ....

No hurry...

Take care
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
All credit to [MENTION=5747263]dav888[/MENTION] :good: :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
i woluld like here to ask somethings and forgive me if i am out of line. (At least here i am not afraid to be censored)

I always use Agni kernel in my installations of MM roms. I am used to it, i like its settings, I have the felling my phone is working better. Especially in this rom with Agni kernel the messures with Antutu are over 34500, a number that you will never see in any other MM rom ( I can bet on this).

But when i am telling about Agni some people seems not to be happy (not here i must underline that)

So i am asking straight because i know i will take a straight answer from our devs here :

Is it wrong to use Agni kernel, do you have any objection in that?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Hey bro...

Just my suggestion...

I feel that agni ...is safe as long as we use properly...

Like if we keep overclocking our CPU,

It's bound to get damaged....

If we set battery xharge at 2000mah in agni, the battery is bound to get damaged...

So ,

I am currently on stock kernel which is beautiful by the way...

Battery lasts for 2.5 days...no issues....

Charges from 0 to 100 in 2.5 to 3.5 hrs....

No opposing to agni, but it has the strength to damage the device....

Even the sound modification...

We are pushing the limits of the speakers...

Might get damaged....

NYC topic.....

I am waiting for a reply from any experienced person
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] jer194:
It seems to work again in MM 6.01 r63 (for CyanogenMod), and in AOSP it works anyway afaik.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
[MENTION=6975569]Vishal Vignesh[/MENTION], i agree with you. I am talking about wise use of everything, not overclocking turbo mods etc

I like fast cars but only to watch them not to ride them :)

Thank you for sharing your opinion here

Although young still very wise
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Tanku:)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Objection? Why?

Agni kernel is a piece of art by [MENTION=4365701]psndna88[/MENTION] and performs better than any stock kernel (ours included) with lot more control in users' hands.

I also suggest people to explore Xposed framework, masterpiece of [MENTION=4419114]rovo89[/MENTION] . These are great projects and I respect them a lot.

If any problem come due to them (though I don't think) just reflash ROM or disable Xposed module. Simple ;)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Alekbrt:
[MENTION=4546136]silentvisitor[/MENTION]

Would you recommend using agni over stock kernel?

The only issue i had with AICP stock was higher temperature when doing various stuff (compared to other mm roms, which is why im asking).
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Nothing can describe Agni better than this.

Keyword is - USE PROPERLY.

Before playing with Agni control app, read about what each function do and what is the limit.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
I always follow your advice and will do so in this case too. So far i have only won from your suggestions, like most of us here i believe :)

logosA using K012 with tapatalk
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
High temperature? Never heard this before :rolleyes:

Mind sharing some more details please. [MENTION=5747263]dav888[/MENTION]

Replying to me or Vishal ? ;)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
Have you notice what [MENTION=7653415]Alekbrt[/MENTION] is mentioning, if so can you suggest anything about that?

logosA using K012 with tapatalk

---------- Post added at 10:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:31 PM ----------

Both , but in this case about xpose

logosA using K012 with tapatalk
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Alekbrt:
[MENTION=4546136]silentvisitor[/MENTION]

Sure man. What happens with my device is for example, when i watch videos that are over 10 minutes, it geta warmer - gsam says around 39 degrees.

Happens with some apps that are feature rich, like twitter or facebook.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
In these scenarios I can guarantee its not the kernel. Maybe something else in your setup cause I use all these daily and phone remains cool as ice.

You can definitely try Agni and report your findings. Don't flash smdk version of Agni.

[MENTION=5554397]logosA[/MENTION] I guess I already replied to him ;)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Alekbrt:
Alright, i'll reflash it with agni

And

Use Gapps from first post?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
my opinion is agni 4.5.5.non smdk and slim gapps zero or mini

but lets hear what other have to say
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] nilaydas:
Slim Gapps link not working. Can someone provide the link from where i can download the Gapps.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
has anyone try the new open gapps of 11/8/16? any differences from last version

---------- Post added at 10:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 PM ----------

yes i can see its not working . I have it.

Do you like to upload it in mega or mediafire and give you the link?

---------- Post added at 10:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 PM ----------

slim zero gapps media fire

http://www.mediafire.com/download/y...ro_gapps.BETA.6.0.build.0.x-20160516-2250.zip
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] nilaydas:
That will be great if you can share the link. Either one (mega or mediafire) will work for me.

Thanks :)
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
in 5 minutes i will give the mega link too, just in case
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Hey bro, are you speaking of slim Gapps,

I thought it was discontinued....
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
yes it is , but then again Agni is too, but they are both still alive :)

I am using Slim gapps from day one, I know almost everyone is suggesting Open Gapps but i never had problems with them as i had with others (camera can not connect, no sound in calls etc)

Maybe because i use them alongside with agni kernel I dont know, but i am following the first rule in electronics:

If something is working dont try to change it :)

---------- Post added at 11:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 PM ----------

so if anyone is interested Slim zero Gapps

Mega upload

https://mega.nz/#!pR9BBbCD!Pk3R5dMimXSKjbzv2C-FdzWrKUXdTu8SHOqdbMSKcP0

mediafire

http://www.mediafire.com/download/y...ro_gapps.BETA.6.0.build.0.x-20160516-2250.zip
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] nilaydas:
Getting FC when trying to open Facebook app or Facebook messenger. Any way to fix that???
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] silentvisitor:
Have you flashed SuperSu ?
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
I accept...

I always stick to slim Gapps....

Agni kernel is too very good,

Too bad it is discontinued...
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] nilaydas:
I did flash SuperSu initially was getting the same error. After that i Uninstalled SuperSu and both FB and FB Messenger and then reinstalled FB and FB Messenger without SuperSU, still the same issue.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] vanmartin:
I experienced some FC's on Facebook a day ago (running the latest versions of Agni and AICP ). Seems the issue was triggered while watching a video in the Facebook app. I eventually rebooted into TWRP and wiped Dalvik and Cache. Seems to have sorted out the issue in my case. No FC's since then. Video works fine now.
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] Vishal Vignesh:
Try wiping it's data and regranting it's permissions
[Galaxy Note II Android Development] logosA:
can you walk me through taking a titanium backup and restore?

Are you taking sys and user data backup on only user is enough?

When restoring after a clean flash, what you do? Boot for first time and dont restore apps from play, no just titanium App and then restore? I want to make a clean flash and want to see how to do it without any time have to reinstall my apps.