[Device Reviews and Information] Alberto96:
Review (part 2)

Benchmarks

I have used 3DMark, AndroBench, Antutu Benchmark, Epic Citadel, GeekBench 4, GFXBench, PCMark (Work 2.0, Computer Vision, Storage & Work 1.0) and Vellamo to stress the device to the limit. I won’t test Games or Video Playback because there are already some related tests included in these Benchmark suites.

3DMark – GPU Performance isn't superb, lower than MT6735, i don't know why every MT6737 device has this Graphics Performance issue.

AndroBench – eMMC Performance is average, providing enough performance for almost every daily task.

Antutu Benchmark – I won’t say a lot about this benchmark, this isn’t as reliable as others. I’m providing this just for benchmarks lovers.

Epic Citadel – As you can see, 3D performance is medium. Not as good as MT6735, but sufficient.

GeekBench – CPU Performance is nearly as good as other CPUs with the same configuration (4x Cortex-A53), enough to handle almost every type of activity.

CPU

Compute

GFXBench – As already said, GPU performance is lower than MT6735 so it clearly confirms that Mediatek broke something in this SOC.

PCMark – Sufficient Performance, nothing to complain about it.

Work 2.0

Computer Vision

Storage

Work 1.0

Vellamo – Just like other MT6737 devices, you can't expect high scores here.

Compared to other MT6737 devices, i do not notice any difference. Except Internal Storage performance that depends on the eMMC chipset, CPU/GPU performance is just the same. Nothing to complain about it except the downgraded GPU compared to the MT6735. (Mediatek, you did something wrong)

Conclusions

Being a new K-series model from OUKITEL, they choose to provide some innovative ideas that i found useful. The 5000mAh Battery Case, together with a Quality-made Metal Chassis, makes this device one of the best 5 inches ever released from OUKITEL.

Yes, i admit that this isn't a perfect device, it could have been better, but i'm pretty sure that OUKITEL will soon release a successor, something like a K7000 Pro.

So, do I recommend it? I don't think that there is a real answer to this question, this is a pretty innovative device that might need time to get some interest.

I recommend it because i found it innovative, but, if you are not searching for this kind of innovation, this might not interest you.

Pros:

Quality-made Metal Chassis

Accurate Fingerprint Scanner

Buttery Smooth Android OS

Decent Rear Camera Quality

Innovative Battery Case

Excellent GPS Signal

Cons:

Screen Colors are not excellent

Barely Usable Notification LED

Low Battery Life without the Case

Lacks Miravision Menu

Fingerprints un-friendly Rear Cover

Rating: 8.4

Packaging and Accessories: 8.5

Design and Materials: 9.5

Performance and Heat Dissipation: 7.5

Screen: 7

Camera: 8

Sound: 8

Battery Life (with Case): 10

Battery Life (without Case): 6.5

Software: 9

OEM Support: 9.5

Price: 9

You can find full-res images (I know, Quality isn't excellent) here: http://imgur.com/a/DBsSz

Official Website: http://www.oukitel.com/products/k/k7000-54.html

You can buy it on many online shops. Official, and authorized, Retailers are listed in the OUKITEL website.​