yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Yes, maybe for G4.

API1 is deprecated and developers should use API2. But as you mentioned many manufacturers don't implement 100% correctly the API...
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] xrad:
What I meant is not necessarily tied to API1, or the G4. I can very well imagine proprietary extensions to API2 as well. So my suggestion was more like to have - internally - some kind of generic camera controller of which there'd be different implementations/extensions to support any number of APIs. Even Google could decide to come up with a new API3, for that matter. I think FreeDCam even employs this concept. Just some thoughts though - as mentioned before I fully understand that this is a lot of work and a big can of worms to open.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] notanapple:
Hi [MENTION=3750240]stratosk[/MENTION],

is it possible to increase the reactivity of the shutter button in the next version of your amazing app? I have compared the reactivity of the button with other camera apps (like oxygenos camera app)....with ur app sometimes photo are taken blurred. Not a big issue, but it's just a feedback! Thank you!
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hi!

Thanks for your feedback! What's your device?

I'm asking because there is a specific procedure taking photo when you press the shutter button. The focus must be completed before the shot. So, I'm not sure what' wrong...
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] notanapple:
I have a OnePlus One with sultanxda cm13. With oxygenos camera app as soon as I press the shutter it takes photo (after focus is completed of course). With footej often happens that I have to press again and again to capture a photo...seems like the shutter button is "non reactive" and for this reason photo are blurred sometimes...sorry for my English hope u can understand the problem I'm referring to. Thanks again!
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Thanks! Please send us an email from within the app (Settings->About->Feedback & Support). Maybe we can see an error in the log file.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] optionalmgrr.la:
Is there any comparison page for the various JPEG quality?

BTW, for paid version, does it mean JPEG quality normal is better than non-paid version?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
No there is no comparison page.

For your information the JPG quality affects the compression ratio of the image.

Low -> 80%

Middle -> 85%

Standard -> 90%

High -> 95%

Excellent -> 100%

The ratios above are the same in the premium and standard versions.

If you will try the Premium and you don't like, I will send you a full refund... :)
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] optionalmgrr.la:
no... i want to support app developers when I can, I just wonder what is the benefit of going premium as it says better jpeg quality. thx :D
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] aser_elhbayeb:
Report: Footej Camera worked back after latest update of RR dated 13/05.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] tuffCookie:
[MENTION=3750240]stratosk[/MENTION]

is it possible to include longer exposure functionality for Nexus 5X/6P and Google Pixel using the method described the first link below?

https://xdaforums.com/nexus-5x/themes-apps/apk-lcamera-longer-exposure-shooting-t3516152

[MENTION=4081787]enryea123[/MENTION] enabled exposure times of up to 5 seconds for the Nexus 5x/6p (i believe stock was 1/5 sec) and up to 2 seconds for the Google Pixel (i believe stock was 0.6 seconds). i have tested the app on both my 6P and Pixel and it appears to work as described.

the idea for this was a result of the Google engineer who took long exposure photography on a Nexus 6P and Google Pixel. the Google engineer indicated that the "Google’s Nexus 6P and Pixel phones support exposure times of 4 and 2 seconds respectively."

https://research.googleblog.com/2017/04/experimental-nighttime-photography-with.html?m=1
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] bender_007:
Hello, is there any changelog to the latest beta?thx
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] rajkatiyar07:
is there any possibility to increase shutter from 1 sec to higher on HTC 10.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
The first part is very interesting, indeed. Though, I think it needs much computational power to do it in phone.

About the exposure times. Footej, reads the camera capabilities through the API. We can't compromise app's stability testing arbitrary values.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
The latest betas include bug fixes.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
What is the maximum value on your device? Is it more than 1?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] rajkatiyar07:
16 seconds on HTC 10 stock camera app. Goes upto 300 seconds after root.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
We will check the issue. But, most probably as I said in a previous post this is the value that it's reported by the API.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] bender_007:
Tested "manual camera" paid, it reports up to 10 seconds, if that helps
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] dnlkurniawan:
Im using this camera now on my s7edge, finaly i found a camera for s7e that did not give a plasticky or face beauty on the front camera.

But i need to use hdr mode, the single shot still blured skin detail.

I have purchased the premium to unlock the higher jpg quality.

What i love to see in the next updates are:

1. No noise reduction option for rear and front camera. (Yes i can shoot raw and get better files but if i can get the no-noise reduction on jpg is a better choise).

2. No sharpening option. (I hate over sharpening effect on the original jpg).

3. 2k (front camera) and 2k+4k (rear camera) video support for galaxy s7edge.

4. Up to 10s shutter speed support for long exposure.

5. Hopefully you can add a mode that burst 3-5jpg and average them into one in order to get a cleaner and detailed shot.

6. I'll add more later :p
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] flaviocc:
Phone model - ASUS ZENFONE 3 - ZE520KL

OS - Android 7.0 - stock rom - no root.

Problem: Full resolution 4656 x 3492 16MP won't show in options.

My stock app from Asus and app Camera Zoom Fx give me the option to set the max resolution 4656 x 3492 4:3

Another bug is the sandwich icon won't work sometimes. I have to close the app and open again to access the menu options.

I have an information that I saw in another photo app with the same problem to show my camera full resolution. That app gives me the option to not use CAMERA2 API. When I turn off that option, the full resolution of my camera is showing on the menu, if I turn ON to use camera2 API, the full resolution is not available anymore.

My best and thank you for your great app.:good:
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] alreadyregistered:
Hi, my phone can only record videos in FHD in 15 fps with that app. Anyway to change for proper 30fps?

Redmi 4 Prime.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hello my friend,

Thanks for your kind words.

This means that the Camera 2 API does not report correctly the camera capabilities.

Unfortunately there is no something we can do. We will check if can take the max resolution from the RAW resolution. BTW, please try to take a picture in RAW format and check the resolution of the RAW image.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Could you please send us an email to support from within the app (Settings->About->Feedback & Support) in order to check the log file?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hi,

Thanks for your feedback.

We noted your requests and we will check if we can implement them.

BTW, we don't use noise reduction or sharpening on photos.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] dnlkurniawan:
Yes Noise reduction and sharpening still there, but not as agressive as default samsung camera app.

One camera app i know that can turn off NR is snap camera. It enables me to turn completely NR on or off, and i can see the result, i want footej have this feature because i already purchase it.

Thanks
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Bwyan Benton:
I've been asking for this feature for a looooooong time. No noise reduction. Don't hold your breath.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] wurstel:
Hi, i can't turn on the flash on my main camera. the flash symbol is simply not there. i am running LOS 14.1 on my xiaomi mi 5s plus
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] maicasajusta:
After searchin' for months I guess I've found the best camera for my Xiaomi Mi5 + Lineage OS.

The only bug I have is that front camera pictures came out upside down, while videos are ok. Probably it's related to this.

I see that lineage os already have implemented the front camera fix above, it works well on all cameras I've tried, but with footej front pics are still upside down. I mean, just the resulting pic, not the live preview.

maybe [MENTION=3750240]stratosk[/MENTION] can help?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] ermetek:
Installed on Sony XZ with android 7.1.1. It would seem to work all properly but just press the shutter button the application stops working. It is necessary kill it.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hi,

Do you see the photo upside down on all viewers? What about Google Photos for example?

Could you please send me a sample photo?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Please send an email to support from within the app (Settings->About->Feedback & Support) in order to check the log.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hi,

Most probably the API does not report the flash support correctly.

Please send an email to support from within the app in order to check the log (Settings->About->Feedback & Support)
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] maicasajusta:
Hi [MENTION=3750240]stratosk[/MENTION], yes I see the photo upside down on all viewers and pc too. Looking at the exif data I've noticed that, differently from other cameras, footej adds a tag Orientation: Left Bottom (or right bottom if you have/haven't enabled flip front camera in settings). Same pictures on other cameras do not have that tag. Could be related to that? I'm just guessing.

Anyway, here is a pic: http://i.imgur.com/ugq2GOo.jpg

Thanks for your support.

Edit: if I rotate the pic with windows in a proper way, that tag changes to left-top or right-top :)
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] mark332:
Nice
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Gingernut78:
Will there ever be a panoramic mode?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Thanks for the photo. I can't see orientation value in exif data for this photo.

Most probably the API reports a wrong sensor orientation value.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] maicasajusta:
But it only happens with footej. Is there something you can do to fix it?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
We will check again but I can't promise anything.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] maicasajusta:
I'm going to pay for pro version anyway cause I really like it...but I hope you will give it a try :) even if have to manually apply the fix, maybe changin' some sensor orientation value in the app files, don't know.

Thanks,

Marco.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Gingernut78:
Just purchased and testing, thanks.

It's working lovely at the moment, easy to use UI and photo quality are really nice.

Bug found on my Xiaomi Mi5s and latest Footej Camera 2.0.6 build, previous build also had the same problem,

is you can't use default system gallery even though it's selected in general settings, keeps force using Footej gallery.

Question: What is the small box in Footej gallery at the top right as it has no label?

It seems to be an auto image cropping function?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] maicasajusta:
hi [MENTION=4262001]Gingernut78[/MENTION] are you on miui? with api2 enabled or not? I'm on mi5 with lineage os but I get selfies upside down, wonderin' about your configuration...
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Gingernut78:
On Miui at the moment and I don't have the HAL3 build.prop edit so camera2 is not enabled but I still get manual controls in Footej.

Selfies are perfect and not fliped.

Your's are upside down because you have added HAL3 enabled to your build.prop.

Did you edit the msm8996_camera.xml file? This file needs to be edited, the two front cameras MountAngle is 360 and has to be 270 to not get the fliped selfies.

Look here: https://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=68889572&postcount=18
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hello,

Thanks for your feedback and for your support!

About the gallery, do you mean that the gallery button in filmstrip does not work? Could you please send us an email to support from within the app (Settings->About->Feedback & Support) in order to check the log?

Yes, the small box is a square crop function.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Gingernut78:
No, Footej gallery works perfect it's just I can't disable it in Footej settings. There is an option to let you use your default system gallery instead but it doesn't seem to work.

I'll send a log anyway.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
BTW, do you get a toast with a message "There is no suitable Gallery app..."?

Selecting to use the default gallery app we query package manager to resolve the activity that can handle the ACTION_VIEW intent (a very common one). I can't imagine why this doesn't work on your end.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Gingernut78:
No toast message and no errors.

I'm using Lineagos on my Mi5s at the moment but the same thing occurred when using Miui.

The gallery has no effect at all.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] bilakos10:
[MENTION=3750240]stratosk[/MENTION], Can you implement high framerate recording (e.g 60fps, 90fps...) on video mode?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Gingernut78:
Help translate

How could I help translate to Spanish, I know it's already translated but I would like to suggest some better translations.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Yes, it's in our future plans.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
[MENTION=4262001]Gingernut78[/MENTION]

Please check your messages. I sent you instructions.

Thanks!
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Gingernut78:
Got it, thanks.

Solved, more than likely a rom problem.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Celludroid:
Hi stratosk,

really like your camera app, I'm mainly interested in the video recording function. Some feature ideas for a future update:

- option to choose other frame rates than 30fps like 24, 25 etc. 25fps would be especially important for European broadcast journalists if they use smartphones to shoot because 25fps is the broadcast standard

- visual audio level meter to check the sound levels before/during recording

- lock for Auto White Balance (so it doesn't change when panning). Or does this already happen when one locks exposure and focus?

- option to set White Balance in Kelvin

One cool thing that the app already does is that it automatically detects external mics (at least the ones that come through the headphone jack) and uses this audio input when an external mic like the Rode smartLav is connected. Maybe there could be a short notice in the app when an external mic is detected/used?

Cheers
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hi,

Thanks for your detailed feedback and suggestions!

We noted your requests and we will think if we can implement them.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] dadme:
An application really successful. I bought it. On my phone, the LG V20 H990DS, rooted with DirtyCow, is the only application with working videorecording, the stock camera on the video recorder produces a static picture accompanied by sound (in MXPlayer using decoder software, it is no longer static but slowmotion). What are the differences in accessing the hardware between Footej camera and stock camera? Is it possible to affect how to access the camera?

In any case, I can not use the wide camera in Footej, on the LG V20, than in the photo mode, in the video recorder mode can not be switched. Videorecording can only be done at 1080p and only mono, although V20 has 2 microphones and native can record both stereo and 4k. It is possible to make it more compatible with LG phones, please?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hi, I don't know why stock camera doesn't work properly and why it doesn't use hardware codec.

We will check about 4K video. Most probably the resolution doesn't properly exposed through API.

Please send us an email to support from within the app in order to check the log file
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] MRDA1981:
Would you be interested in incorporating certain aspects of the PMS CameraNextMod v7 app into your own in order to attain clearer and more solid pictures? I use the PMS CMN app as my main shooter for still snaps as it can take some striking shots on my ZUK Z2 Pro, but it falls short when it comes to shooting video (Footej is more stable). I think that if you got into contact with the bloke at the helm of the other app or tried incorporating the factors which give his pics that great quality level, you could make Footej the ultimate point 'n' click camera app for Android devices.

APK: https://github.com/FSadino/android_packages_apps_CameraNextModv7

Flash zip: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24591000424941310

XDA thread: https://xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/themes-apps/mod-cameranextmoddenoise-feature-t3393254
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Nuk99:
I am using CUOCO92 ROM on my Leeco Le Max2. All is working fine even the stock camera but I like to do some manual settings and as a reason of that I use your great Footej camera in Pro version. One thing I have to complain is the syncronization with the flash light. So let me try to give you an overview of my problem for better understanding. In stock camera app the follwing will happen:

Tick the shot button->flash light goes on to give the camera the chance to focus correctly. After getting focus the flash light will get higher brightness (the intensity grows up) and the shutter takes the picture. All is fine. And now the behaviour with Footej camera:

Tick the shot button->flash light will be on high intensity for less than a second then the flash light is dimming to a low level-> the focus is adjusted and then the shuter takes the picture. The result is a really dark picture because the flash light was only on low intensity when the picture has been taken. It seems that Footej camera uses two values for the brightness off the flash. The highest brightness for focusing and a low brightness value during taking the picture and this value is to low for Leeco Le Max2 devices.

I have taken another approach with OpenCamera. The behaviour is different to the behaviour of Footej camera. OpenCamera takes the picture exactly at the point where the led flash light is comming to its highest intensity. So as a result the picture is to bright. Just the opposite of the Footej camera result.

So for me it seems that the sync with the flash light can be adjusted within camera2 api. Also the intensity of the flash light can be adjusted by the camera software which is using camera2 api. The only thing which have to be done in Footej camera is to adjust the intensity of the flash light for the Leeco Le Max 2 device. May be other models have the same problem. A solution can be the following logic:

IF ModelName = Le X820 then FlashLightIntensity = <value> or

IF ModelName = Le X820 then FlashLightIntensitySlider.Show = true (may be for adjusting the correct value by user).

May be you have the value (both values?) for the flash light intensity stored in a config file. Then it would be easy for all the Le Max 2 users to adjust that value because the ROM is rooted.

I would appreciate your answer.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Thanks for your feedback.

About the quality of your pictures. Did you try to increase the JPG quality in app's Settings?

Also could you please send a sample picture?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Thanks for your feedback.

Although, we didn't have similar reports, we will investigate the issue.

Could you please send us an email from within the app (Settings-About-Feedback & Support) in order to check the log and your devices characteristics?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] Nuk99:
I will do so. Thank you for your efforts.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] mihaiylaa:
Cannot record slow motion

Hello . I have an Nexus 6p and installed the application. All works well except the slow motion recording . Even if i choose slow motion or normal motion all the videos are recorded on normal motion. I changed the resolution to 720p too but it doesn't work. Thank you
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hello,

Could you please send us an email to support from within the app in order to check the log file.

Also, please share a small sample video recorded in slow motion (having the option of slow motion enabled).

Thanks!
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] MRDA1981:
I always select the highest resolution and quality on my camera apps.

Here are some pictures:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/1gEyEEPdZmaOYbxj2

https://photos.app.goo.gl/Trun5oW5fj5oG3P72

https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZiYCEdi4osqmipN53

https://photos.app.goo.gl/bajuXZCQ9VT82v9q2

https://photos.app.goo.gl/sISiPbY4N8oeZSaG2
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Thanks, but can you also send a sample with Footej in order to compare the result?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] MRDA1981:
Here's a quick comparison:

Camera Next Mod v7: https://photos.app.goo.gl/rtR9lckDYZ4YbSVn1

Footej: https://photos.app.goo.gl/LPgYrHvYYMsk6Pi72

Camera Next Mod v7: https://photos.app.goo.gl/INfAast8UDEXfdvt2

Footej: https://photos.app.goo.gl/HHk8pzFgYrbeVIF33
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
The only difference I can see is the different focus and exposure points between 2 samples.

Do I miss something?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] MRDA1981:
CNM has more detail with zoom.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Ok, we will try to check
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] eqagunn:
[IMG="Google Camera"]http://i.imgur.com/DIQkfQH.png[/IMG] [IMG="Footej Camera"]http://i.imgur.com/d1KBDfd.png[/IMG]

Hello. Nexus 5 owner here. I prefer to take photos in 16:9 ratio.

Google Camera allows 6.0MP (3242x1848) photos, while the highest 16:9 resolution for Footej Camera is only 2.1MP (1920x1080).

Not sure why GC chose that resolution instead of 3264x1836 which is true 16:9, technical limitations I guess.

Why is Footej Camera missing higher resolution 16:9 options and will they be implemented in near future?

EDIT: I see now this has been reported a year ago.

Any plans for implementing cropped 6.0MP option?
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
Hello,

The problem with Nexus 5 is the there is no native 3264x1836.

Google uses the 4:3 resolution and then crops the image to 16:9.

To be honest, we didn't use this ugly solution in Footej... :)
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] eqagunn:
It's not ugly to the front-end user as he doesn't care about inner workings.

All he sees is that when he selects 16:9 6.0MP, he gets his whole screen filled with image allowing him to take the shot as such.

To him, this is much more convenient then having to take it in 4:3 8.0MP and then cropping it manually to 16:9.
[Paid Software Announcement and Discussion] stratosk:
I merely agree.

But if you develop an app for thousand different devices you need a general solution