yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T LG V10] albaniandroid:
The problem is there i will try to see which app is keeping my screen on ..how to do that?
[AT&T LG V10] Fifen:
Been months and I'm sick of lollipop. I just can't seem to get upgrade to Android M. Phone is now unlocked running T-Mobile. Live in the states.
[AT&T LG V10] Shadow Assassin:
Sorry for the late reply.

Put your phone in safe mode and see if its a third party app, if not, then is and OS error.

To put your phone in safe mode.

Hold the power button until the power menu pops up

Then click and hold Power Off.

A dialog will pop up asking if you want to enter safe mode.

Click ok and your phone will reboot into safe mode.
[AT&T LG V10] wow11:
works like a charm, I am from India and used this wo AT&T sim. One question though will the security patch download or update automatically. My security patch shows as of date 01 March 2016
[AT&T LG V10] freeky10:
I'm really trying to follow this and while I'm pretty savvy on my V10, trying to get the CMD to cooperate apparently isn't my thing. I really want Marshmallow on my V10. I've downloaded, unzipped and moved 20N.up. I'm stuck starting at step 5. I am running Windows 10.
[AT&T LG V10] tootpop:
Using an Australian sim card had error at 3%. oh well..
[AT&T LG V10] TheBobMiller:
Did you install Android Studio or Minimal ADB?

Did you try doing it without the sim card installed?
[AT&T LG V10] tootpop:
Yup i got an error code of 0x1125000
[AT&T LG V10] Chiaomein:
Does this still work with the recent ATT update a couple days ago?
[AT&T LG V10] jaseking79:
I created the software update folder, copied the 20N file into that folder. When I run the force command in adb. It shows the FOTA screen but after a few seconds goes straight to the home screen. Running straight out of (C:\Program Files\Minimal ADB and Fastboot>adb shell) next guess is to get the full android SDK.
[AT&T LG V10] .android:
It could refer to the "LG V10 USB Drivers" which can be found here: http://www.andromods.com/download-files/latest-lg-v10-drivers-usb-adb-fastboot.html
[AT&T LG V10] whiteKnight909:
unlocked lg V10 MM upgrade

Please Help,

I have an unlocked AT&T V10 and I live outside the US, can I upgrade to MM through this method??

If not can someone please show me how.

Thanks
[AT&T LG V10] freeky10:
I'm not sure I'm getting this. I think I need to bow out and just suffer with Lollipop. I'm not just following what I'm supposed to be doing. I downloaded the drivers from that link, but I'm still only getting List of drivers attached, and nothing else. Sigh. Thank you anyways for your prior attempt to assist me.
[AT&T LG V10] yaoihost:
MM Success

Just to let you know:

I installed the complete Android Studio which includes SDK

Installed LG Bridge

Followed instructions to the letter as posted by the OP.

All worked - I am in Australia with a VodafoneAU SIM inserted and performed update with said SIM installed - not originally rooted or modified.

I previously used SDK to start tethering as it didn't authenticate (no ATT SIM) and the *#*#2666#*#* code to remove ATT contacts.

The only thing that doesn't work and still doesn't is no 3g service (HSDPA,HSUPA,UMTS) I only get 4gLTE and EDGE.
[AT&T LG V10] atultripathi:
It doesn't work. The screen flashes once but nothing happens after that.
[AT&T LG V10] sucj97:
sorry, but how to add my computer to trusted list?
[AT&T LG V10] mrcoolgli:
I want to upgrade, however root is a big deal for me since I can un-install the ATT crap they put on the phone. Specifically the damned updates they seem to try to push down at the most inconvenient times. Beyond those issues I would do it..
[AT&T LG V10] zahidb:
i successfully upgraded my ATT h900 from the same kdz.. downloaded it from this link

http://www.mylgphones.com/att-lg-v10...-download.html

everything went smooth & error free although my phone was rooted on 5.1. i used LG UP & used the "Upgrade" option..

nothing was deleted or overwrite either.. everything remained intact.. i say go for it..

sadly.. no change in interface at all..ditto same as 5.1.1... all behind the scene upgrades apart from Wifi calling
[AT&T LG V10] Bristle:
future updates

Thank you so much for this.

Is it possible to get to, Build number: MRA58K Software version: H90021x through that method.
[AT&T LG V10] boydx:
Error downloading update

I got an error connecting to the LG site, I believe. It boots to "updating software", then gives a message "Software Update Unavailable. Please contact LG for support.
[AT&T LG V10] masteruten:
hello, i just bought the LG V10 h900 at&t unlock phone, do i have to update it first to the latest software stated in the at&t website or i can do directly the above steps to upgrade it to MM. Thank you.
[AT&T LG V10] wnerog:
Anybody that can provide the stock tot file? The link in the OP for the stock tot file seems to be no longer working. Thanks in advance!
[AT&T LG V10] Shadow Assassin:
what version of android are you on?
[AT&T LG V10] wnerog:
5.1, I have my phone rooted so I needed the stock ToT mentioned by OP if i'm to follow instructions. Wanted to update to MM if possible, thanks.
[AT&T LG V10] bobbylx:
Same question, anyone got a copy of the stock ToT file? Or, has anyone tried the OTA file in this thread with Flashfire?
[AT&T LG V10] Dr4In:
http://storagecow.eu/index.php?dir=Xda/LG+V10/AT&T+H900/

---------- Post added at 11:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:59 PM ----------

http://storagecow.eu/index.php?dir=Xda/LG+V10/AT&T+H900/
[AT&T LG V10] drpav:
I have an unlocked AT&T V10, will it work on that??
[AT&T LG V10] nizuak:
wil post after alls done!!!
[P3300, MDA Compact III General] v13t_b0y_v13t:
Hi there,

I`ve just got my first PDA O2 Orbit and I`m pretty new with PDA word. My fone is working fine with everything but when the incoming calls come, it like I turn the speaker on. I turned all the speaker off, the phone volume off, all the volume are minimum. I did the soft reset, hard reset, took the battery out for a while, etc etc, but they dont work. It is embarasing talking to my friends with the "speaker on" so loud :(

Any one could help would be so much appreciated.

Kind Regards

v13t_b0y_v13t
[P3300, MDA Compact III General] syuan87:
I also met this problem for my HTC p3300 last month,thn i took my phone to the service center....After checked,the changed a new main board to me and told me tat it was caused by mainboard failure....Maybe u can send ur phone to the service center and check it.
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
UPDATE:

I was able to get 2 units side-by-side again. This time both of them were encrypted. The difference was one was running the original MDA89E OS and the other was running the latest MTC19V OS.

I just did 1 simple test, I created a 238.5MB zip file of my Titanium backup directory.

On MDA89E (user partition encrypted) it took 6:39

On MTC19V (user partition encrypted) it took 1:01

This result along with the previous results that found virtually no difference between decrypted and encrypted on MHC19Q leads me to the conclusion that decrypting probably did see a performance boost on the original MDA89E software all the way up to probably MMB29V but from MHC19J onwards, up to at least MTC19V, there is virtually no real-world (rather than benchmark) difference between decrypted and encrypted.

I didn't have time to do more detailed testing on this phone as it needed to be returned.

----

So I have 2 5x's side-by-side running MHC19Q. Exact same software loaded, exact same system settings.

One has encrypted userdata. The other has decrypted userdata. Both have dm-verity (integrity checking for /system and /vendor) disabled.

I compare boot times and they are the same.

Then I compare taking 3 HDR+ camera shots and the speed is the same and the processing of HDR completes at the same time.

I start browsers on both and they come back the same time.

I tried starting Riptide GP2, Cut The Rope, and a offline GPS program I use. The games started maybe 0.25 seconds faster on the unencrypted phone. The GPS started the same.

I was surprised at how little difference, so I rebooted to make sure nothing was cached, and retried. Same results.

As an aside, I also compared boot times with bootloader locked stock encrypted with dm-verity enabled to decrypted with dm-verity disabled. Decrypted with dm-verity disabled might be 1 or 2 seconds faster for start up, but you get a 5 second delay with the Orange bootloader warning screen.

So I'm wondering what else to test to show off how fast decrypted userdata is? If there is a noticeable benefit on something I use often I'd probably end up keeping the userdata unencrypted.

I'm not interested in artificial benchmarks showing throughput.

For the record, I haven't experienced any lagginess on any of the configurations, encrypted or not, for my own usage patterns, even on the original MDA89E.

The camera is definitely faster to start up on MHC19Q over the one in MDA89E but only by about 0.5 second.

Standby battery time is the same whether encrypted or not. That is really dominated by whether you have wifi turned on all time (either on purpose or through android bug) or going to sleep and whether you have strong or weak cell signal.
[Nexus 5X General] C3C076:
From my personal experience.

I ran my N5X unencrypted for couple of months and then decided to encrypt to see if I experience a noticeable difference.

I didn't experience any noticeable difference so I decided to keep it encrypted and still have it this way. I think it's not worth it to bother with disabling forced encryption during every firmware update, especially when running stock kernel.
[Nexus 5X General] razrlover:
Pretty much same as everyone else i have talked to and my personal experience isn't any different.

One other test I am interested in, restoring a back up of stock rom. My 5X seems way slower restoring a back up in twrp latest than my n6 or 6P, anyone else have the same experience resorting back ups.

Or do sfhub can you run the test?

Thanks for the post!
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
I don't have the side-by-side units anymore, but I'm guessing at the linux level if I did copied the system partition image to the data partition using dd I would notice a difference.

At the Android level I'm thinking the "extra" stuff Android is doing causes it to not be able to reach the full potential of the storage (even at the half speed the encryption has supposedly limited the storage to)

Kind of like putting a 550MB/sec SSD on an old computer with SATA2. It can probably only do 150MB/sec over the SATA2 (vs SATA3) interface, so even if you drop the SSD rate in half to 225MB/sec, while that looks bad on benchmarks, your old PC doesn't care because it can barely handle 150MB/sec.

I didn't do tests to prove this, so it is just a theory, but I did do some side-by-side comparisons listed above and I really can't effectively tell any difference between encrypted and decrypted userdata (for my usage)

I'm guessing the nandroid backups from TWRP would see some difference, but I don't do those often as the images are just getting larger and larger these days.
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
As an update, I left the unit unencrypted for about a month, but recently I discovered 2 downsides, which while minor, pushed me over the edge to re-encrypt the user partition.

With user partition un-encrypted (only tested MHC19J through MTC19T)

1) visual voice mail tab disappears from phone application if you reboot in airplane mode (this is on Project Fi)

2) USB OTG flash drive reader takes 2 inserts to recognize micro-sd card

These both have to do with delayed recognition of attached devices when user partition is decrypted. In the first case, upon reboot while in Airplane mode the SIM card is not detected, instead it says "No SIM card". When you have encrypted user, it detects the SIM card and says "No service"

For the second case, it detects the USB flash card reader, but not the microsd card in the reader. Upon second insert, it detects both. When user partition is encrypted, it detects both immediately.

These are detailed here:

http://xdaforums.com/nexus-5x/general/resolved-visual-voice-mail-disappearing-t3391434

Also in re-encrypting the user partition I found it didn't work through Android "Settings" for my setup.

I have systemless root and TWRP 3.0.2-0. When you choose to Encrypt phone using Settings, it proceeds to reboot, but then gets stuck at the animation forever. I left it like that overnight.

I then held the Power button to reboot, expecting everything to be corrupted with a half way encryption, but to my surprise, the phone booted with no issues and the Settings still said it was un-encrypted.

I then went back and flashed stock boot and recovery, and rebooted the phone, allowing the standard "first boot" encryption to run. It took around 10 minutes, but everything encrypted fine with no data loss (I had around 15GB on the phone at the time, all backed up of course)
[Nexus 5X General] andQlimax:
When the difference is small you won't notice in daily activities, unless in a particular condition, one day, on one app that requires to process lot of data (reading/writing from disk) you will notice that it take some time if you have encryption. That's why the use of benchamark, they give you an indication of who is definetely faster (in many conditions faster just for 1 millisecond, sometimes faster than some seconds/minutes)!

You should test apps that write read / write lot of data, maybe like measure a heavy game start up, or measure an app that write for example mp3 tags in bulk mode to all mp3 of a huge album, etc.
[Nexus 5X General] Joms_US:
Right on, it has no real-world difference similar to modifying the kernel, just a PITA to go back and forth every time there is a new release.
[Nexus 5X General] 2x4:
this discussion is making me consider encrypting my data partition again via the security->encrypt phone menu.

if i backed up my current system via TWRP to external storage prior to encryption, would i be able to restore it on top of the encryption?
[Nexus 5X General] Javi22:
Damn it! I decrypted but today I flashed PA rom and it got encrypted again

Do I need to format data always when flashing??

When I had decrypted, I didn't notice better battery. But maybe a slightly fastness improvement. Or maybe placebo. But I don't mind losing encryption
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
As I mentioned, I understand benchmark differences. I only care about differences I will notice in everyday use. I don't really care about running un-encrypted so that a benchmark runs fast or something somebody else uses, but I never, or almost never, use will run slightly faster.

For what I do use, I tested offline GPS apps which load lots of data. I tested Riptide GP2 which loads a decent amount of data. Basically everything I tested from within Android had so little difference (if any) that it wasn't noticeable. I am talking .25 second at most.

You probably will notice if you write to a file directly using dd, for example if you are doing image backup of system, but I really don't do this stuff daily. I might do it only once when I first get the phone to preserve the factory images.

Anyway, since the difference was so tiny and I noticed a separate problem of my visual voicemail tab disappearing on reboot related to encrypted user partition, I re-encrypted. The test I care about is if I am grumbling everyday about how slow things are and really I noticed zero difference.

I don't have anything against un-encrypted user as I ran that way for a month. I just really saw no benefit.

As a bonus my USB OTG flash reader gets recognized right away instead of requiring 2 inserts.

There is no way this encrypted vs un-encrypted setup is causing the huge slowdowns some people are experiencing. That is caused by something different, probably EMMC getting close to full or some Android bug.
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
Encrypt from Settings->Security won't work with TWRP and rooted boot.img. At least it didn't with MTC19T. I don't know if the problem is TWRP or boot.img but on the reboot after the Encryption plugin your phone warning/prompt the thing just hangs on the boot animation forever (I left it all night).

I ended up flashing stock boot.img and recovery.img, then letting the encrypt on first use routine go through. It took around 10-15 minutes. Then I flashed TWRP and supersu again. This is the only way I was able to re-encrypt and preserve my data.
[Nexus 5X General] 2x4:
hmm wait, so there's no way to re-encrypt if you've already decrypted and you're using a custom rom?
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
If the kernel you flashed has forceencrypt in the mount tables, it will encrypt upon first boot.

I was able to preserve unencrypted through various flashes by following this routine.

fastboot erase boot

fastboot flash boot boot.img

fastboot erase recovery

fastboot flash recovery twrp.img

[(re)boot into recovery from bootloader]

install SuperSU.zip

The key is never let an unknown status boot.img, where you aren't sure of the encryption status, boot on your phone.

If you always install SuperSU (even if not necessary) after flashing unknown status boot.img, then it will always patch the boot.img to remove forceencrypt and you'll never get re-encrypted.

You could replace any of the steps above with equivalent pre-patched kernels, etc.
[Nexus 5X General] Javi22:
Thank you! I will consider this next time
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
I don't know if it works with custom roms, I can only tell you what I experienced with the setup I described, originally stock MTC19T boot.img that went through systemless root setup via SuperSU and TWRP recovery.

I didn't experiment further to see if the problem was with TWRP recovery or with the systemless root boot.img so I can't tell you which one (or both) was causing the issue.

I imagine if your custom ROM is based on a stock kernel, you could LEAVE the custom rom system image in place, JUST flash stock boot.img and stock recovery.img, let the first boot encryption do its thing, then reflash your custom boot.img and twrp recovery.

That is what I did to get things re-encrypted and it was relatively painless after I figured out what to do.

Even if your custom ROM is not based on stock kernel, the same technique might work, because the encryption is done by the kernel prior to Android booting. Your custom ROM in this case, depending on why it is using a modified kernel, might not boot properly until after you replace the kernel it expects.

So in short, I think you should be able the encrypt, but probably not with Settings->Security
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
UPDATE:

I was able to get 2 units side-by-side again. This time both of them were encrypted. The difference was one was running the original MDA89E OS and the other was running the latest MTC19V OS.

I just did 1 simple test, I created a 238.5MB zip file of my Titanium backup directory.

On MDA89E (user partition encrypted) it took 6:39

On MTC19V (user partition encrypted) it took 1:01

This result along with the previous results that found virtually no difference between decrypted and encrypted on MHC19Q leads me to the conclusion that decrypting probably did see a performance boost on the original MDA89E software all the way up to probably MMB29V but from MHC19J onwards, up to at least MTC19V, there is virtually no real-world (rather than benchmark) difference between decrypted and encrypted.

I didn't have time to do more detailed testing on this phone as it needed to be returned.
[Nexus 5X General] hmghmg:
For me, unencrypted is the way to go. I use my phone as my main music player, and audio tends to skip when I'm using my phone while listening to music on an encrypted setup. It's kind of a deal breaker for me tbh.
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
Did you try that only on early OS releases?

I record and playback 1080p video with no skipping. 1080p video is much higher bitrate than audio so it would be surprising if encryption on the latest releases would cause skipping for audio.
[Nexus 5X General] hmghmg:
Yes, I have! I tried it on the latest marshmallow build. (Sorry, I forgot the build number)

If it works for you, I wonder what's wrong with mine...
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
1) When you say "using your phone" what else are you doing when it starts skipping?

2) Which music app are you using

I'm pretty sure decryption of an encrypted user partition can easily handle the bit rate needed for audio playback if everything is being done in isolation, so there must be some interaction going on that causes what you are seeing.
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
I went back and tried this test:

Played 640x480 mp4 video

Copied 900MB pre-compressed file (MTC19Z factory image) over MTP to user partition while video was playing.

Phone had to read/decrypt/playback mp4 video while simultaneously write/encrypt 900MB of pre-compressed data.

The video played back very smooth, no skipping.

I was even able to jump around different locations in the video and response was immediate.

I then copied the MTC19Q pre-compressed factory image over MTP in the background.

Simultaneously I recorded 25 seconds of 1080p video using the builtin video recorder. Recording was very smooth.

I then went and played back the recorded video. Playback was very smooth, no dropped frames.

So in this case the phone was encoding 1080p video, encoding/encrypting/writing to disk, while a separate stream was encrypting and writing to disk a pre-compressed 900MB factory image. In addition decoding 1080p video (reading/decrypting/decoding from disk) while simultaneously encrypting/writing to disk worked fine.

I think this demonstrates the encrypted filesystem is more than capable of handling audio playback which is at much lower bitrate.

There is probably something more than the encrypted filesystem going on in your situation.
[Nexus 5X General] hmghmg:
It skips even while just opening the app drawer on my google play launcher! It's just a slight skip, like a beep in length. It's not that obnoxious but it really bothers me.

It skips on Poweramp and Foobar. It rarely does on Google Play Music, but it still does.

I'm using the 16gb version, if that helps.

I initially thought it was caused by the thermal throttling but I still don't get why it doesn't happen when I'm decrypted..
[Nexus 5X General] sfhub:
Well I installed foobar2000 v1.0.35 and played some mp3 files I had lying around.

I tried many things, google maps, opening app drawer, web browsing, copying MTC19Z factory image.

Nothing I could do would get the music to skip.

I am on 32GB but I don't think that would make a difference unless you were running out of disk space, in which case, the EMMC can behave erratically and there could be many pauses during disk activity.
[Nexus 5X General] hmghmg:
I'll try on the latest N preview. (Since I don't think a custom boot.img is available for it yet)

I'll leave it encrypted up until the official release.
[Nexus 5X General] yalokiy:
I noticed big difference in skype startup. It's about twice faster without encryption.
[Samsung Galaxy On7 Questions & Answers] Abhiton:
please developers add Samsung galaxy on5 and on7 in the device categories. These devices are not in the list. If someone add these devices, it may help both the developers and the learners.

Thank you.
[Samsung Galaxy On7 Questions & Answers] heldc:
Seconded!
[Samsung Galaxy On7 Questions & Answers] Jish98:
Yes Please add Galaxy On7 to your lists.

There's no single custom rom found here for this device. :(
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] V1ncent9:
Hey everyone Dev [MENTION=7088285]savixx[/MENTION] tried to port cm12.1 to our Xperia E3 non Lte veriant from a Lte veriant it successfully booted and no problem in it but Wifi,dual sim network/signal and camera not working . well always a bug for CM though,so there's any dev to give lil guidence to make things right .thanks in advance:fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed:
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HackYouDaily:
Try toggling Airplane mode. Does it even recognize your sim card? or doesn't show it at all?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] V1ncent9:
It show sim icon but network dosent work I replaced the modem files but still it doesn't show up
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] V1ncent9:
Please any dev there to help