yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] Debjeet:
I'm on RR Remix Rom with firmware 6.6.x but i want to install the global stable 7.2.3. Can i just install the zip from recovery or anything else needed to be done ??

---------- Post added at 09:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:39 PM ----------

Can i install the zip from recovery with 6.6.10.0 installed ?
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] raymond_bqg:
I have no root and no twrp installed.So can I flash it by stock recovery and if some thing goes wrong then is there any backup and restore process in stock recovery??
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] ya7hu:
Stock recovery doesn't support flashing of custom ROM, You must flash TWRP via fastboot or via flashify after obtaining root permission.
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] raymond_bqg:
hey am.... at first thnax for replying. But u misunderstood my question. Actually i know about flashing custom rom. I am talking about flashing Miui v 6.6.10.Can i flash the stock rom by stock recovery? what is the backup and restore process if something goes wrong while flashing the stock rom by stock recovery
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] sharan.nyn:
Sorry this is off topic. But didn't want to start a thread about it.

What will happen if while flashing by fastboot. The pc shuts down due to power failure? Would that mean a hard brick. Or can that device be still be flashed again?
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] Toruk.Makto:
I guess rarely anyone experienced it, but from my understanding, it can be flash again or it can be a situation that device won't cross fastboot (means won't boot into ROM). It all depends on % completion. Can't say anything specific.
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] CYKEB:
After updating to this ROM via OTA I have weird behavior with my recovery and fastboot.

So the stock recovery is installed again... When I try to boot into fastboot with

adb reboot fastboot

, the device only restarts. I can get into fastboot mode by pressing Volume-Down while starting the phone. Anyway when I'm flashing a ZIP there, it doesn't really get flashed. It's transferred really fast (faster than it should be), but nothing happens then.

I'm really stuck now here... anyone experienced similar behavior?!

Edit: Seemed to be a problem with my adb/fastboot files. Post can be deleted
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] kosrica:
If I upgrade from Miui 6 to this version, am I going to loose the stock recovery and the bootloader will be locked?

I mention that I'm on stock rom v6, I have stock recovery and the bootloader unlocked - as the phone was from factory.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
[IMG="PAC-ROM Header"]http://pac-rom.com/images/threads/thread_title_glass/Header_Glass.png[/IMG]

This is an unofficial build of PAC-MAN ROM 5.1. 1, built from original sources with nothing changed on my part.

I decided to make these builds as there is no official maintainer support for many months and people have shown interest in running this ROM. on the S4 Mini.

Please note that I am not a developer, so will not/ can not fix bugs (if any); these are up to the CM and PAC-Man ROM teams.

DISCLAIMER

* By flashing this, you automatically void your warranty!

* You are installing this software at your own risk

* I am not responsible if your phone, SD card or anything else breaks or causes damage of any kind to anything as a result of flashing this ! Remember, you flashed this at your own free will!

INSTALL GUIDE

1. Copy ROM and Gapps to your external SD Card or internal memory

2. Boot into recovery (latest TWRP preferred)

3. Wipe Dalvik/ART Cache, Cache, System and Data

4. Install ROM and Gapps

5. Reboot

DOWNLOADS

KK ROM:

Serranodsdd (GT-I9192)

Serrano3gxx (GT-I9190)

Serranoltexx (GT-I9195)

LP ROM:

Serranodsdd (GT-I9192)

Serrano3gxx (GT-I9190)

Serranoltexx (GT-I9195)

MM ROM:

Serranodsdd (GT-I9192)

Serrano3gxx (GT-I9190)

Serranoltexx (GT-I9195)

Gapps:

Open Gapps

NOT WORKING

All should be OK

CREDITS

This is not my work, all credit goes to the developers:

- Google

- CyanogenMod Team

- PAC-ROM Team and all contributors

- [MENTION=3044346]arco68[/MENTION]

- [MENTION=5368296]sekil[/MENTION]

- [MENTION=943196]k2wl[/MENTION]

SOURCES

- CyanogenMod

- PAC-ROM
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] Egor Gunko:
Brilliant work!)

It's fascinating ROM, thanks for keeping it alive)

And thank You for minimalstic, easy to understand OP)
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] echo124:
Ambient display doesnt work
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] arsm74:
[MENTION=5416372]csendre[/MENTION]....gr8 job ...installed in my i9195 and it works OK.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] ukicar:
does not work for me too ..

tried with motodoze application .. halfway success :p

**copy apk into /system/priv-app/MotoDoze .. give the right privileges 0644 for app and (0755 for dir).

by the way ... great job
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] echo124:
Ambient display to be fixed?
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
As I mentioned in the OP this is all based on PAC and CM sources with no modification on my side. I am just a builder not developer.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
New builds are uploaded for all three devices
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] MrNataan:
good job... I'm interested in using new roms since the tioguda stopped working in BlissROM,

Sorry for my bad english
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
Made new builds and could not upload anything to AFH the whole day ... :mad: It uploads all the way and then it never completes and gets added to the list ...

Hopefully tomorrow
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] tioguda:
Send a request for support to request FTP access if you have many of these problems
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
I just did :) Web worked perfectly for me until today, I never had issues before

Update: Finally all builds are up.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] rayzen6:
New build dated 5th may is so good. 1st impression on me by pac-man is just awesome.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] singh54:
Superb and Great Rom...

After long time returned back to CM..

After a lot of confusion which one to flash, flashed this PACMAN LP:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:

bcuz so many cm based roms are now available for the device...

Bcuz we got a new dev/compiler/builder whatever it is;););););)

All the credits goes to [MENTION=5416372]csendre[/MENTION]...:):D:D:D:D:D

A great thanks [MENTION=5416372]csendre[/MENTION]...for building for our s4 mini, you almost trying to keep all the cm builds alive....

Thanks bro..

Regarding the rom,

Everything is fine.....good working no bugs at all. Battery and performance also great..:good::good::good:

the ambient display bug, its not so serious one......bcuz i wont used that in the past.......

Thanks once again:good::good::good::good:
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] rayzen6:
Ambient display just works fine for me. No probs.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] singh54:
Hmm...OK thanks for the info....I will check:)
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] singh54:
My bad only....the ambient display is working great...its my fault I didn't checked it correctly....thanks [MENTION=7259727]rayzen6[/MENTION] for the info...:)
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
New builds are up, security patch level May 1 st
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] alex_is2:
Question

Thanks for the ROM, I'm downloading ...:)

The question is:

My s4 mini duos this changed imei, buy used, this unlocked because it was reported stolen ...

if you install the ROM, lose imei? I would stay no signal?

regards

Sorry for my bad english :good:
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
Stop asking the same question in all forums and don't buy stolen phones.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] Anwar105:
Is anyone facing several shut down problem while app is optimizing process.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] sumansur2008:
I have faced only google keyboard FC problem. Went into recovery(Philz), factory reset and running smoothly since then. Gapps flashed latest AROMA from opengapps.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] singh54:
Thanks

Flashed the update...

No problem everything is working great..

Just want to inform the dev, the security patches level are still level April:confused::confused::confused::confused:
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
I presumed it was May as CM12.1 already had it when I built this.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] singh54:
No problem dude...:good::good:
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] singh54:
Have a small Doubt

Does the CMUpdater apk is present in this rom or not????

Bcuz i am trying to provide OTA support to this rom by following the guide of BIOGENEX...but i am not able to find the CMUpdater apk anywhere in the system folder....That's why i am asking...:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:

Sorry if i asked anything stupid... Please someone help...
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
No. That is a separte app people have to install. Thanks for your efforts!
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] thanosb:
daydream not working:(
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
New build 06/17

New builds are up for all devices.

I used the new CM kernel source v 3.4.112. I tested this with CM 12.1 before and worked well, should work with this ROM as well, but make a backup before flashing it.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] arsm74:
[MENTION=5416372]csendre[/MENTION] The android security level is still April 2016 on latest build

Can you check?
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
It means they stopped pushing the security updates to pac 5.1 .... I guess there is no point updating any further ....

Also, I see people lost interest, very few downloads ... maybe I'll make an update in a few months, but for now it goes on hold.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] matesurano:
You are right. PAC was my favorite rom till kk 4.4.4 but as soon as it became lollipop i really lost interest. Main reason being lack of the features. They were known for integrating every features cherry picked from PA+CM+AOKP. I never needed xposed modules with pac. But unfortunately now they are like vanilla cm.

.........just my opinion.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
LP was not even bad. Check out their MM version. It has absolutely nothing added, it is plain CM13 .
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] arsm74:
i do not use this ROM as my daily driver.. just wanted to test it.

I am very comfortable with AOKP MM ROM on my i9192/95.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
Yes, AOKP is what I use as daily driver as well. I found it the best from all I tested which is why I decided to maintain it.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] obaidmuneir:
[MENTION=5416372]csendre[/MENTION] bro will you work on Pac Man MM based rom?
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
No, there is nothing to work on., it is useless. Basically It is CM13 with a PAC boot animation and absolutely nothing else. I made several builds for the duos, nothing ever changes. Here is the link to the most recent. You can flash it to see for yourself
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] obaidmuneir:
Hmmm I check ,

Thanks for your support bro
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
I see you are on LTE. Just edit the zip and delete the first line in /META-INF/com/google/android/updater-sript and you'll be able to flash it. You will not have cell signal, but you can see how the rom is.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] obaidmuneir:
Thanks again bro :D

i like you

wish you always Good Luck (Y)
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
Last Builds - PAC KK

Hi all, since the LP ROM doesn't seem to be updated anymore and the MM version is not worth building in my opinion, I have decided to stop making PAC ROMs in the foreseeable future.

As a farewell, I will make one last build of each major version for all devices, starting with the KK ROM which some people were asking for. After this I'll delete all PAC sources from my PC, don't ask for further builds.

Here are the links for KK

- serrano3gxx

- serranodsdd

- serranoltexx

LP will come next
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] icero:
[MENTION=5416372]csendre[/MENTION] Demons friend you have gained all my love himself:v
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] matesurano:
Thanks man. We will all miss PAC. But you are very right, there is no point building it further. Btw,. what are the changes in this kk version, I mean other than security patches.?!

........R.I.P. PAC.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
Here is their KK gerrit, check out commits. Last update was September 2015
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] tenshi_xp:
Thanks csendre I'm building PAC 6 and will make it public when receive a features update maybe in alpha2 or beta 1, atm is CM13 with few extra features, nothing special. BTW I will do it just for DS version.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] alex_is2:
after installing the rom my s4 mini duos remains unserved, without signal

I returned to stock and returned signal

How I solve the problem of signal?

* PD: It is the best rom, occupies only 100 megs of RAM
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
Something is wrong at your end, I flashed it to my duos and signal is not a problem. Try flashing a stock with Odin then recovery and this one again.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
Great news, at least it will live on
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] kamikaze702k:
hey bro

thanks for your contribution, would love to have another LP rom as a backup, currently im on AICP10 on my 9195.

soon as you get out the LP PAC i will be saving it.

thanks for your contributions also for the remix kernel
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
PAC LP - last builds

The PAC LP builds are now done as well, links in the OP. File dates July 12

MM next
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
PAC MM

These are done as well, and I am done with PAC for a good while. Hopefully [MENTION=4198570]tenshi_xp[/MENTION] will keep PAC 6 going.

Here are the links (also in the OP)

- serrano3gxx

- serranodsdd

- serranoltexx
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] migueldvp:
I NEED DEBRICK.IMg from this ROM.

Hello, please can someone help me?! My phone is hard bricked, dond do nothing no vibration, no recovery, no download mode, no samsung logo, nothing it just showed as qshusb_dload on windows 7.

as i read is hard bricked but i saw thata some people are having sucess recovering their phones using a debrick.img on a SD card.

i need that someone with a big heart help me to do a debrick.img from this rom.

I let this http://xdaforums.com/show....php?t=2600976

Direct link. xdaforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2500001&d=1389091779

This is a flashable .Zip that do the debrick.img from your recovery and save it on your SD card ready to upload and try to save my life

This is a SAFE zip dont worry if the post say that is for another model, i tried it personally on my s4 mini running this rom and it worked perfectly!! but as an idiot i deleted the debrick.img from my sd card thinking that i will never need to use it, and now.. im bricked, i recomend you to save this debrick.img too on your pc.

my device is a gt-i9192 with LP 5.1.1 from this pac-rom.
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] Sureshtuty:
Edit- Deleted
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] Tom Mix:
asking for rom details: android security patch level

[MENTION=5416372]csendre[/MENTION]

i found this rom by accident. wow! a KK from 2016-07-11 :D :crying: :D :crying: :silly:

unfortunately there is an info missing: in 'about' the rom does not show the security patch level.

any infos on that?

and since this ist the latest KK rom (serranoltexx) ever on the planet i have to ask: will there be a security patch level 2017-03 :confused:

sorry i could not resist :crying:
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] csendre:
Not sure when did they update last, I never saw a security patch in any PAC KK rom. The PAC team has stopped updating security patches (and actually everything) in both KK and LP long time ago so it is safe to say, you will not have a 2017 one :)
[Galaxy S 4 Mini Android Development] Tom Mix:
thx for the info

[MENTION=5416372]csendre[/MENTION]

that is a userful information. didnt know pac was not android-securiti-patch-level aware.

-> i was wrong thinking the build date equals the a-p-s-l :rolleyes:

so thanks.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] PaulB007:
http://www.androidheadlines.com/201...boomsound-ships-may-no-sprint-or-verizon.html

Just saw this posted a few others places a few hours back, let's hope that CDMA just wasn't listed and that come the 12th this will not confirm a very horrible possibility. I absolutely do not want the GS7 or the G5 due to all the negative things I have heard about battery, ect.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] codeglitch:
Read this article:

http://m.gsmarena.com/htc_10_goes_by_fcc_ahead_of_announcement-news-17569.php
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] PaulB007:
I was actually thinking about looking up the FCC stuff after I posted it, so that is a little bit more reassuring.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] PaulB007:
http://www.technobuffalo.com/2016/04/10/new-htc-10-leak-hints-at-hi-fi-boomsound-may-launch-no-cdma/

Technobuffalo now running with that story too, let's hope it's just speculation. I can't believe HTC wouldn't release its flagship on all carriers though. Have they not seen how badly this hurt Amazon and Palm with pushing their hardware when it wasn't that popular at the time?
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] codeglitch:
Its normal for manufatures to not release 1 version for all bands and stuff... 1 device will be for cdma and other for the rest, i wouldnt waste my time on a place called techno buffalo ;)
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] Itchiee:
This is my last hope of upgrade, if it has an IR Blaster... The S7s do not, and i'm kinda off by the LG G5.

I would love to return to HTC... Those was some of my first smartphones...HTC Titan, HTC Evo.

I really hope they don't shoot themselves... It seems like this would really hurt them if true.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] OMJ:
the "no cdma" claims are bogus!
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] Anonaru:
This is what I'm hoping-- or at the very worst, the first round of M10s being GSM only, and then a subsequent CDMA release. Due to how cheap my Unlimited / All plan is, I really won't be leaving Sprint unless they go out of business :good:

I'm pretty positive that, even though Verizon is a pain in the butt to provide for, they are far too large of a player for HTC to ignore. Sprint isn't as much of a concern, but they still represent a significant number of possible sales.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] Jaytronics:
No, what is bogus, is that these companies even release multiple versions in the first place. This whole fragmented hardware thing is a bit on the retarded end of the common sense spectrum. Lets hope that HTC has the common sense to just build one device that will just work on all networks. If Motorola can make the Pure X edition that works on all. Then surly HTC can as well. Again, fragmentation is crap. And is leads to far more tech wast. Also, it makes manufacturing far more expensive. I am goingbtobhave to say that if it is the case that Verizon and Sprint wanted to play the you need to pay us to allow your devices on our network games. Then HTC probably said screw them. I would not blame them either. I am on the Verizon network. And quite frankly, I would love to see them just fail hard and big. Not that they will. As they are protected by government. But, it would be cool to see it happen. They price gouge, take advantage of data rates and abuse manufacturers.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] OMJ:
then you'll be disappointed....wont happen
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] hgoldner:
Expect it on Verizon the moment it is available.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] thedrizzle:
Verizon is carrying this device. I just spoke with my VZW Enterprise rep, and while he couldn't give a launch date (because HTC hasn't dropped that yet), the HTC 10 is showing in their upcoming devices matrix as the replacement for the M9. My rep has never led me astray about any devices that I've asked about. He said after HTC's announcement tomorrow you will see it available for preorder.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] mcwups1:
Are you picking this up?

Sprint M8
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] isellfood:
There is a Sprint version
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] Jaytronics:
Im not sure what I am going to be disappointed about. As I expect this to happen. At least regarding HTC and some other well known manufacturers.

But, yes, it does happen. We have the Motorola X Pure. And it works on every carrier here in the US.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] topjohnwu:
VZW is definitely gonna have the HTC 10.

We, known as S.Team, got a leaked VZW HTC 10 system dump :)
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] OMJ:
definitely!
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] smallba:
Just talked to my local Sprint store, and they don't have a release date as of right now, but it is coming
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] Sammae7:
And it looks like HTC did indeed take that route. Nice.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] Anonaru:
There's a happy noob and noob's wife over here who couldn't be happier to hear this news :highfive::highfive:
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] drumz0rz:
I'm crossing my fingers extra tight that Verizon includes the Red edition and is available on release day! Also, the HTC price is $699 for the 32GB model. Any word on 64GB or carrier pricing?
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] Sammae7:
I see $699 for 32 GB.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] mcwups1:
Sprint tweeted that they would be announcing a release date soon.

Sprint M8
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] osmosizzz:
Sorry battery life issues in the s7? The s7 and s7 edge have fantastic battery life. Go to the devices battery life threads and you'll see that most with the s7 and s7 edge love their battery life. Can't say much about the g5. Haven't ventured to the respective thread but I don't like the phone anyways. To reply to your question which has been answered, spring and Verizon will have a separate release date because of CDMA
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] AarSyl:
Did any of you truly expect HTC to release a device only to two of the four major carriers in the US? And we're talking about the same company that released the Evo LTE (Sprint exclusive version of the One X with the ext SD) and the M8 for Windows (Verizon exclusive)?

Just the thought is absurd. There's no faster way to sink your company into its grave than to upset soooooo many customers by leaving them in the dark.

If they aren't released for Sprint and Verizon, it would be because the carriers don't want to pay for a CDMA version of those devices. But I would doubt that. In fact, I'm certain that it would never happen. Not for a flagship, at least.

P.S.: Sup, OMJ?
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] jbea007:
VZW or Sprint

Doesn't HTC.com site claim that the unlocked version has CDMA support so wouldn't it work for VZW or even Sprint?
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] OMJ:
hey dude :)

the ATT, TMO & VZW all have the same modeid...I suspect the unlocked version will also work for VZW...but they have made it clear it wont work for Sprint...

Jeff Gordon pretty much confirmed this...https://twitter.com/urbanstrata/status/719949958166786048?s=15
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] jbea007:
[MENTION=506238]OMJ[/MENTION]

Ah. It kinda goes both ways. He not saying yes or saying no.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] Zach092:
He's not saying no and the device has the needed CDMA/LTE bands to work on Verizon, that was enough for me to pre-order it. I figured it's probably like a nexus 5X/6P situation where they won't activate a sim in that device for you, but if you pop in an activated sim it will work. If I'm wrong, I'm sure I'll be able to sell it.
[Sprint HTC 10 Questions & Answers] jbea007:
[MENTION=506238]OMJ[/MENTION]

I'm going to give it a try. Gonna wait till the black is available. I still have the A9 i need to return. Hopefully the promo code for $100 still works