yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[G Pad 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] p3y0t3:
After going through the headache of trying to get TWRP on one of these tabs, I managed to snag the latest kdz for it. I've flashed 3x via LG Flash Tool 2014 so yes its been vetted and definitely works HOWEVER with that said, I was NOT able to root it with Kingo like I did when this whole adventure first started out nor was I able to do the Download mode root via DP-Tools. Also worth noting is that fastboot appears to be disabled. Anyhow! I've seen probably half a dozen requests here and elsewhere in the last couple of days for the stock rom vk410, and yay I have it but need somewhere to upload it to. It is 1.33gb, file name VK41023A_00.kdz md5 hash of 550CFF41D572B642F242F787C06846E5.
[G Pad 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] creamdotcom:
Is it at&t Lollipop?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kenchoids:
is anyone successfully rooted their device? if yes, How? TIA
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] agentdeep:
http://xdaforums.com/note-4/orig-development/tool-utility-twrp-2-8-1-x-teamwin-t2956011

http://xdaforums.com/apps/supersu/2014-09-02-supersu-v2-05-t2868133
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] marc_ecko28:
Invalid thread...
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] A0_o:
5.1.1 root works

the question is there any xposed ?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ravijani:
people reporting xposed doesnt work. wait for wanam to confirm or fix.
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] marc_ecko28:
But 5.1.1 roots work perfectly? Can you please testify to that?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ravijani:
means root working?

root is working but with twrp and supersu beta as one said.
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] marc_ecko28:
Thanks man!

I dont want to sound that I want spoon feeding. But can you please lead me and give me the link to that file?

I am looking for it and can't find the way to root 5.1.1 via TWRP and flashable superSU zip.

Thank in advance!
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thereassaad:
Ok guys lets do it for Note4 MM

1st install twrp v3.0.0 through odin with uncheck autorebot

Then reboot manually to twrp

2nd flash supersu v2.71 ,

Voila u have root ,

Enjoy it ,

?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] edem84:
Thanks!!
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] marc_ecko28:
Thanks! But any idea why after flashing superSU v2.71 I am stuck as Samsung Logo?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thereassaad:
Exactly im sorry mate i don't know why but look at my ss , its working just fine
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AndroidWars:
What is your first impressions? Did u try good lock apk? I'm curious good lock app hows look like... When snap a shot with Camera to view gallery speed?
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] falio:
root works :) thanks man
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahmedrehan:
Anyone tried wanam's xposed v 80.1?? It's for marshmallow
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] falio:
i try it ..and bootlop :D
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahmedrehan:
I backed out at the last moment and rebooted from recovery :D
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sawdoctor:
I've successfully flashed a prerooted deodexed zip, just need to odin bootloader so no need to worry about root or meesing about. Just hang fire till some custom roms get uploaded

Edit

Forgot I also restored a 5.1.1 backup as well
[Honor 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] deanz93:
For those who has problem with Hi-Suite can use this version. it was version V4.04.301 and the latest available from the internet.

Click this link and update you backup in your phone.. Tested by me and working backup.

Don't forget to press thanks.. :o
[ONE General] fcuk90:
Hi all ,

It is possible to swap my one plus one 16gb emmc storage to 64gb ?

What do you all think?
[ONE General] MZO:
Since all the other hardware is same, I think yes it is possible, not sure if it si worthy

Transmitted via BACON
[ONE General] fcuk90:
For me , the phone still very fast. Just that the storage is not enough.
[ONE General] fcuk90:
I am looking for anyone done it before?
[ONE General] iPusak Gaoq™:
Not possible as the emmc is solder on the motherboard....removing/replacing/swaping it might destroy the motherboard if you not careful enough....you best chances is to buy 2nd hand OPO 64GB (screen faulty or etc) and use it motherboard on your device or buy a working 2nd hand OPO 64GB and use you OPO 16GB as a backup....
[ONE General] NickosD:
I would go for the whole mb to take the 1 gb more ram too.
[ONE General] fcuk90:
The whole 64gb mb would cost like 470remimbi equivalent to 70usd
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] kronium:
Doesn't seem like the clock or battery icon move around like Always On mode. Will this eventually cause burn in?
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] brawlysnake66:
No. Amoled displays don't suffer from that. Even high quality LCD displays like found on the iPhone will have a hard time causing burn in.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] CuBz90:
The information provided above is false. Amoled screens can suffer from burn in. However, with the Always On Display, the clock moves around every 3 minutes or so to avoid burn in.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] berfles:
He's asking about the night mode, which puts the clock on the edge of the screen. It doesn't move around in that mode.

I don't know the answer, but I don't use it for that fear.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] CuBz90:
Ah!

I imagine the night clock woukd cause burn in ad it does stay in one place.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] Richieboy67:
Well the numbers do change every hour and minute so I think it would be hard to get any noticeable burn in.:D
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] kronium:
Unfortunately the battery icon and next alarm displayed doesn't change.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] roloracer:
I was wondering this and also worried about burn in , so I turned off night clock because it doesn't move, and I'm asleep so I don't need it on.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] ydoucare:
I doubt it, the brightness would be low enough to minimize the risk of burn-in.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] jrwingate6:
I don't think it would. I have mine set to only stay on from 1AM until 5AM (the hours I'm most likely to wake up in the middle of the night and want to see the time.)

I don't think 4 hours is enough to cause burn in being how the pixels are lit up very dim when using the night clock.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] J.Biden:
The pixels are stilll active though, shortening their "life". Will you notice any burn in or difference in screen quality in that area within a month or six? Probably not, but it'll burn in (or, leave a mark if you want) no matter what after 24+ months. AMOLED is a tricky technology, so I personally stay away from "AMOLED black" themes and whatnot. Why? The black areas are turned off, while the colored/lightened pixels are lit up. The areas that are "off" will have a longer "pixel life" than the ones most used, so it'll make a sort of "ghosting" effect after a while (2 years+). Using a theme or whatever that's "even", i.e not on and off at different places will give me an even "burn out".

I have no idea how good the EDGE's panel is though, so this is pretty much pure speculation, with some facts mixed in!
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] hp79:
At first I was also worried that the pixels don't change position, but having it on for a week, I think it's too dark to cause a burn-in.

The Always-On clock looks like it'll burn in more because it's bright even though it moves around every couple minutes.

I use a black background. I don't think it'll cause uneven wear. Every time I use a web browser, the background is mostly white. I think that's enough to evenly burn in the screen. I usually keep the screen little dimmer than normal to avoid burn in., but I'm not afraid of ramping up the brightness when I'm outside under the sun or reviewing photos.

One thing I don't like about the night clock is that it shows the alarm that's couple days out. I think Samsung really need to fix this as this is obviously a bug, or they didn't test it enough.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] J.Biden:
Everything is pure speculation regarding the AMOLED panel around here, so we won't really know anything concrete until something happens, or someone gets a nasty burn-in. I doubt anyone will get a nasty burn-in though, but I guess someone will get some burn-in down the road, but that's pretty much expected.

I have a Galaxy Note (first gen.) that I used for about 18 months before getting a new device, and I've borrowed it to my mom. I checked it out again this week after not checking it out for about two years, and the display looks like ****, but it doesn't look more **** as it did the day I gave it to her, so it's "bad" if I'm trying to edit some photos, but it's not catastrophically bad at all. The only place it's burnt in is the statusbar, which is black on pre-lollipop versions if I remember correctly.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] NVPE:
Hi clever people

So I'm a bit confused. I found this thread because I was afraid of a burn-in caused by the night clock too.

And I won't use it. But how about the always on display, then - by using that, is there a risk of shortening the life of the pixels? In that case, I'd just turn it off. But if not, well, then it's a neat feature
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] kylelopez20:
Well, I have set night clock every night, It doesn't burn the AMOLED screen. It's completely safe. Try it on your own, no risk :) They prevent burn in, because of brightness help keep prevent burn-in.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] NVPE:
Thanks. I was more curious, though, as to how the Always on Display feature might affect pixels and the screen lifetime too, and thus, if it'd be better to not use this feature
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] JhinCuatro:
False. AMOLEDS suffer burn in, and LCDs will rarely ever experience it.

---------- Post added at 11:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:41 PM ----------

No offense that is the most stupid reason I've heard not to use dark/black themes. White themes ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY TO CAUSE BURN IN, PERIOD. You reduce burn in by reducing energy consumption and pixel usage.
[OnePlus X General] 111hemant111:
[Disclaimer: I'm not responsible for a broken SD Card or SIM card or both and this task surely needs patient hands.]

I have been a great lover of Oneplus X. I love its performance (on ashwin and MA's CM13) and its beauty has always amazed me but the only drawback which I've always felt is the inability to use sd card and dual sims together. Today I tried pretty hard to find out a hack by making SIM card as thin as possible and trimming the extra bump on sd card and guess what ? It works :D

I am not well versed with XDA jargon, so please bear with me :)

Be as careful as you can especially when u r removing the SIM card terminals layer:

1. Cut the SIM card along the portion separating the card body and metal terminals with a paper knife as if you are trying to peel off the metal contacts part from the card body. (Be extremely careful here so that you don't damage the chip terminals)

You'll be left with this:

[IMG="SIM Card Front"]https://dl.xda-cdn.com/3/7/1/1/6/9/7/1.jpg?key=vQZP_ILMdwG2nRDNOvjtHw&ts=1587893871[/IMG]

2. Take the bottom part of the card as in the following picture, and slightly rub the encapsulation with a sand paper such that it doesn't rub the rest of the SIM card surface. The only objective of this part is to make it thin as there's a bump which would obstruct the SIM card insertion.

It should end up like this:

[IMG="SIM Card Back"]https://dl.xda-cdn.com/3/7/1/1/6/9/8/2.jpg?key=PlcN2YBaRSYKOa7QiGTRFw&ts=1587894131[/IMG]

3. Now take your SD Card and you can observe a minor bump at the end of the sd card which can be trimmed by using a sand paper and this should result in an sd card which is on the left side of the pic compared to a non-trimmed one on the right side.

[IMG="Micro SD Card - Trimmed"]https://dl.xda-cdn.com/3/7/1/1/6/9/9/3.jpg?key=ELNvnU5j3RfbBjiAPQl0Jg&ts=1587894210[/IMG]

Now place the SIM card in the slot this way:

[IMG="Sim Tray"]https://dl.xda-cdn.com/3/7/1/1/7/0/0/4.jpg?key=463aZWwx9FiTPTEqPVxjlA&ts=1587894044[/IMG]

Voila..!!!

And the result..?

Screenshot:

[IMG="Dual SIM functionality (Status Bar) along with Micro SD Card"]https://dl.xda-cdn.com/3/7/1/1/6/7/4/Screenshot_20160408-150610.png?key=XVrFGNeDnQjksg1vVKmNrw&ts=1587894528[/IMG]
[OnePlus X General] Tiongkia:
Wow. High risk but great job
[OnePlus X General] aredpanda:
Niiiice, thanks for trying this out and sharing it! Definitely gonna try this myself.
[OnePlus X General] mafioso16:
Definitely NOT going to try this, very impressive job though! That's the true pioneer's spirit :D
[OnePlus X General] 111hemant111:
[MENTION=7387419]mafioso16[/MENTION] haha...:D the disclaimer seems deterrent but frankly speaking, it isn't as difficult as it seems considering the fact that you can always replace your SIM card...still, it's up to u :)
[OnePlus X General] jevgeje:
Still, It's kinda dangerous to do this to your SD card. But still, kudos to you. :)
[OnePlus X General] 9888:
nice try
[OnePlus X General] virajkin:
It would have been great if u put a DIY video for this, many people would give a try
[OnePlus X General] 111hemant111:
I had no idea that this was gonna work until it really did. Someone can make a short tutorial video out of the attached pics and forward it to me, be assured I will give credits for the movie making :)

P.S. I'm not good at movie making
[OnePlus X General] dysoct:
Thanks for trying it. Been wondering about it and might try it soon!
[OnePlus X General] knauji:
Wow I never thought that could work!! Won't risk it though haha
[OnePlus X General] ashwinpilgaonkar:
Is there any chance this could damage the SIM/SD Card pins inside the slot in the phone? Or maybe cause some issues when ejecting the tray?
[OnePlus X General] 111hemant111:
the SIM card i managed to trim is as thin as a good quality paper...and the sd card bump is also trimmed, so u r practically inserting a normal sd card...what i have observed is, over two days of experience, it's pretty easy to remove and place again and again...never had an issue ejecting, i tried some 8 to 9 times in these two days...
[OnePlus X General] purnenduraj234:
I done it today and succeed...

not too hard but very risky...

enjoying dual sim with memory card..
[OnePlus X General] 111hemant111:
congos man...(y)
[OnePlus X General] purnenduraj234:
welcome bro..
[OnePlus X General] Dinesh6252:
I was also thinking of doin this kind of thing with my oneplus x too. Now i am sure i can also do it without any problem.
[OnePlus X General] ClownRippaz:
Damage to the phone!?

Hello, great work. Something i wondered about alot but didnt want to try out.

How is the PHONE handling this extra? Heating up? what side effect do the phone get, im surely secure that the phone was not meant to handle both sim cards and sd card at the same time, or was it? Or did they just made a smart solution for 3 things?

I want to do this but SD card risk is no problem i am more worried about the damage on the phone itself.
[OnePlus X General] 111hemant111:
I have been using this for a week and what I've understood is our OPX is meant to handle both sim cards and sd cards simultaneously juz as any other mobile but the designing department went with a form factor tweak juz to keep the mobile as thin as possible...I am sure had they provided different slots for sd card and sim cards, they could have faced difficulty at thickness... but that said, it doesn't take away it's ability to handle both...

And coming to my observation, the read and write speeds on sd card are same, the signal strength of sim cards are same and heating is not at all in existence... I use [MENTION=5426059]ashwin007[/MENTION] and [MENTION=5321417]MasterAwesome[/MENTION]'s CM 13...
[OnePlus X General] ClownRippaz:
tx

Tx mister for answer, great! I will do this for later then. Anyone know anything about thread/discussion about how to disable everything on second simcard except data?
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danknasty:
I have rooted 2 boxes now to 5.0.5 and after having them fully up and running updates blocked etc. I leave and come back to find that the device has updated to 5.0.5.1 and has lost root. It also no longer has team win recovery on it anymore. How is this even possible? The second one I watched automatically do some update in twrp I didn't get to see what was all on the screen but when it booted the root was gone. I checked adb the updates are still turned off but appears that the recovery was wiped and none of the root stuff works like google play, xposed framework.. nothing.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] PhoenixMark:
I would say that you didn't block updates using the best possible method using a terminal to enter pm disable com.amazon.device.software.ota. My rooted box is still rooted. In fact when I click on check for software updates it throws an error message which is just what you want.

I hear the new update method is using SSL and going over HTTPS which can't be blocked using other methods as the contents are encrypted.

You do know you can still use the rooting method that uses an A to A USB cable to root again? You'll just have to install rooted 5.0.5 to do it and stay on 5.0.5. I have a Mac guide for this on my site. marksmods.com

As far as you seeing and update happen and TWRP doing something, it was probably that screen that appears saying Running OpenRecovery Script with the message Patching system image unconditionally which is what happens when updating.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danknasty:
But I did use the terminal pm disable updates, like I said it still says that updates are blocked even after it ran this update. But shouldn't the recovery stop it from updating even if it does download the latest update? And yes it did say patching system unconditionally but it did this all on its own while I was not touching the device. I also just tried rerooting it and it seems twrp was never wiped but now it will not read any usb device so I cannot install any rooted zips. Is it possible they have found a way to bypass the recovery?
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AFTVnews.com:
If you had pre-rooted ROM 5.0.5_r1 or 5.0.5_r2 installed, recovery wouldn't have stopped the update. TWRP would install the OTA update just fine. I have personally confirmed this. It wasn't until 5.0.5_r3 that rbox disabled stock recovery.

That said, I haven't actually tried to see what happens if 5.0.5_r4 (latest version) downloads an OTA update. I'll test it in a few minutes and report back.

UPDATE:

Well, I just finished testing it out and it turns out TWRP will install the OTA update on the latest 5.0.5_r4 ROM. So blocking updates is mandatory and you shouldn't rely on TWRP to reject the installation. Even though [MENTION=3991724]rbox[/MENTION] disabled the stock recovery, it looks like TWRP is flexible enough to accept Amazon's update.

Specifically, I rooted a 5.0.5.1 Fire TV 2 with rbox's method and installed the 5.0.5_r4 pre-rooted ROM. I did not block updates in any way and the box received the 5.0.5.1 ota update, which incidentally was the full update and not an incrimental one. The box rebooted into TWRP and installed the ota update within TWRP. I recorded the whole thing with my capture card, if you want to see it [MENTION=3991724]rbox[/MENTION].
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danknasty:
But I AM blocking the updates. In fact I was able to reroot downgrade to the preroooted 5.0.5 r4.... updates blocked again through the pm disable command. I even tried updating before I went to sleep and got an error. I wake up to an updated and unrooted 5.0.5.1 again. And again still showing me that updates are blocked even after this update.... sorry guys I just realized I was using the fire os 3.0 method of disabling as I was using the function in the adbfire program. I am going to try again by manually typing these adb commands hopefully this time it does not auto update. I guess we did stumble across a new finding however from this.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rbox:
So this is something I didn't even think would happen, but it makes perfect sense. The update gets downloaded and it writes the /cache/recovery/command file to tell recovery to update. It reboots in to recovery. Stock recovery is disabled so the box reboots normally. TWRP starts for bootmenu and says "Hey, there is a command file present, let me run it". And then it installs the update. I'll disable that and release it with a prerooted 5.0.5.1.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danknasty:
Awesome thanks for making it idiot proof for people like me.
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Swifty:
[MENTION=3991724]rbox[/MENTION], thanks for your efforts.

I just got my Fire TV a week ago, used kingroot, then installed recovery, then installed the prerooted 5.0.5 all using [MENTION=5957312]AFTVnews.com[/MENTION] guide and had everything set up nicely but woke this morning to find the new update installed and wiped everything.

Anyone know if I can use the same kingroot & recovery method on the new ROM to get TWRP back so I can install the prerooted ROM again?
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rbox:
kingroot doesn't work in 5.0.5.1. You need to use the method with the A to A usb cable. It's all documented in my install recovery post here and aftvnews.com
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Swifty:
Thanks very much, will check out the guides and get the soldering iron out as I don't think I have USB A - A :)
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AFTVnews.com:
Exact guide you need is here: http://www.aftvnews.com/firetv2root
[Fire TV Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] PhoenixMark:
Glad you posted this question. Great stuff here. Sounds like my blocking method should protect me from the update then...
[Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sohail667:
i have very strange issue about charging

when my charging reach at 80% charging becomes very very slow

on galaxy charging current.apk shows repeatedly going down charging current

normally it shows 1200 MA plus

but when it reach 80% it show only 220MA charging current.

plz guide me:confused:
[Nexus 5 Developer Discussion [Developers Only]] ale_191:
Hi men, please, I need a help :(

This is my Rom: https://github.com/eM4Mark

It worked perfectly before the last update ( r24 , first it was r22 ), but now I have this error.

make: *** No rule to make target `vendor/mark/system/vendor/media/LMspeed_508.emd', needed by `out/target/product/hammerhead/system/vendor/media/LMspeed_508.emd'. Stop.

make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Is very nice, because If I compile for Nexus 5X I don't have that error... PLEASE, help, I'm going crazy:silly::eek:
[Nexus 5 Developer Discussion [Developers Only]] metahex12:
try with another vendor
[Nexus 5 Developer Discussion [Developers Only]] santi1993:
Try another vendor, maybe u have any 5x fork on ur compiling bench

Sent from my fx-82MS with CM-CAF
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Learnincurve:
Hi,

Rebuilding my z3+ I notice that there are pads from several of the ribbon circuits that connect to contacts in the inner edge of the frame. I don't have pictures, but it looks as if these connect to the aluminium strips that form the outer sides of the frame. So my question is if anyone know their function. I notice that the non-original frames are missing some of the contacts.

Do the frame sides form part of the system of antennas? If so, which? GSM/Wifi/GPS?

Could there be some other function?

B.R.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Questions and Answers] durius:
Hi,

I have several gigs of music files (mp3) stored in Sd card.

Although I've tried to move them into several different folders I cannot get music apps (google music or samsung music) to list all the music.

I'd like to know if anyone has experienced the same problem and if there is a way to solve it.

Thanks in advance