yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Accessories] kenboyles72:
Guess it all depends on what kind of protection you want. If you just want mild protection and to just cover the sides, then go with the tpu case. If you want heavy protection, I would suggest the Tudia Omnix Hybrid, http://www.amazon.com/TUDIA-Full-body-Protective-Protector-Resistant/dp/B00SO4XYHA . I have the Tudia case and it has taken a beating and protected the phone very well, even from some pretty high falls. Only con about the Tudia case, is that the front covers the sides of the screen a bit and prevents touch at the the very edges of screen. This can be a bit bothersome if using apps in full screen/landscape when you have to swipe down to exit full screen.
[ONE Accessories] pbergonzi:
I too have a Tudia--Slim-fit Cygen.
[ONE Accessories] Harsimratsethi:
thanks

thanks
[ONE Accessories] woodz93:
I totally agree, couldn't have said it better. Here are some visuals for you. I got the Diztronic case when I bought the phone, it has protected it from falling out a car, off the desk, and off a moderately high shelf. You can get a tempered glass screen protector off eBay, have to search a bit (TechArmor don't have one). I got one from user dreamlight2004 for around 5 dollars. I made the mistake of getting the OPO screen protector when i first got my phone and it went bad a month ago, a hard scratch from a key. Tempered glass protector looks so much better. Just loaded COS13, it should keep me busy until the OP3 gets announced - so far it's looking to be a really good phone (boo on the OP2 and OPX)

Case view

Phone view
[ONE Accessories] Jadelor:
I agree, Diztronic bumpers are terrific.
[ONE Accessories] leokook:
I'm using this one http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rearth-Case-OnePlus-One-Folie-Ringke-Fusion-Schutzhulle-Cover-Tasche-klar-/121715293296?hash=item1c56cbfc70:g:gAUAAOSwT6pVt5tV And it is awesome. You can also print your designs for this case!

Ringke Fusion for me is great. It covers the OPO completly.
[ONE Accessories] Doomerts:
DO NOT BUY THE TUDIA CASE.

I bought it because I thought it looked pretty sweet. It's the worst case I have ever owned, and I have owned a few. Half the case is slippery nonsense plastic. You grab your phone "wrong" (by this I do not mean insecurely, but simply you happen to not have your fingers on enough of the case's rubber outline), it's like holding an eel.

The clips covering the audio jack and usb port are an absolute NIGHTMARE to open, and plugging in your charger for the night would realistically take three hands with 17 fingers each to manage in a reasonable timeframe. Good thing my audio jack's clip, after having been used exactly twice without even the slightest bit of the abuse it deserved, now no longer clips into it's crevice, and is permanently hanging out at a 30 degree angle. The pop-out clip on the back is nail ruining torture to get out, as is the rubber outline holding the front of the case, should you want to get this garbage off to see how far you can launch it through the air in rage.

I wouldn't use this piece of junk if they paid me.
[ONE Accessories] Deleted member 5862960:
I am using the TUDIA Dual-Layer case+a glass screen protector, which turned my One to a tank :D

I drop it way too often, but it still works flawlessly, so I can recommend this case. It also coverers the aluminum frame
[ONE Accessories] PaKii94:
I can rep the Poetic Case found here:

I took out the screen protector but I have been rocking the case for more than a year. It is kinda bulky but I have no worries about dropping it or tossing my phone on my desk. Also, It is kinda water resistant (with the screen protector). I have dropped like a glass of water on it and quickly cleaned it up with no harm
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kamelzouari:
why there is no HSDPA mode for Radio Mode connection

HELP- HELP PLEASE I NEED HELP

I'am a beginner user, i installed few days ago REVOLUTION HD 93.0

I want to connect with 3G++ HSPDA mode but i don't see it in setting radio mode

I dont know how to do ...

This is below the actual phone parameters

this is a HTC ONE M7 U EUROPE

The provider is TUNTEL from Tunisia

Many thanks to whom can help me

c:\fastboot>fastboot getvar all

(bootloader) version: 0.5

(bootloader) version-bootloader: 1.61.0000

(bootloader) version-baseband: 4T.35.3218.16

(bootloader) version-cpld: None

(bootloader) version-microp: None

(bootloader) version-main: 7.19.401.151

(bootloader) version-misc: PVT SHIP S-ON

(bootloader) serialno: xxxxxxxxxxx

(bootloader) imei: xxxxxxxxxxxxx

(bootloader) meid: 00000000000000

(bootloader) product: m7_u

(bootloader) platform: HBOOT-8064

(bootloader) modelid: PN0711000

(bootloader) cidnum: HTC__J15

(bootloader) battery-status: good

(bootloader) battery-voltage: 4033mV

(bootloader) partition-layout: Generic

(bootloader) security: on

(bootloader) build-mode: SHIP

(bootloader) boot-mode: FASTBOOT

(bootloader) commitno-bootloader: dirty-0e2a13e5

(bootloader) hbootpreupdate: 11

(bootloader) gencheckpt: 0

all: Done!

finished. total time: 0.084s

c:\fastboot>
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] donkeykong1:
HSDPA is esentialy 3g. If you have H in notification bar, that should be it. Measure your internet speed and see what results you get

dey tuuk ur juurbs
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kamelzouari:
thank you for your response.

when i tested speed before installing revolution hd ROM, i dad 16MO down with H signal HSDPA without LTE.

Now, after installation the ROM, I have GSM-WCDMA-LTE with H signal but only 2MO down all time.

I think that HSDPA and HSDPA+ is for 3G++ mode , but the RADIO is not well configurated in revolution HD ROM or some thing like that. I dont know really how update the radio to get the maximum speed rate.

best regards
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] donkeykong1:
Your problem is not with ARHD, you simply have a different phone. ARHD is made for UL version of M7, so radio is a bit different to allow 4g speeds. Sure, it will work with your phone too, but, as you already know, there will be some issues. Like you say - you have 4g (lte) option, but your radio simply doesn't support that kind of connection. I don't have any idea on how to increase your speed, except flashing a stock ROM for your phone, sorry

dey tuuk ur juurbs
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kamelzouari:
thank you for your response.

effectively, my phone is U version radio.

what exactly the stok ROM file should I use, and where can I find it for downloading.

Best Regards;
[Nexus 6  General] frap129:
Hey there XDA! I need a little help with something. I'm trying to test some new optimizations, and there's one change that could make a huge difference or no difference at all, and I need more people than just me to help test it. The rom used for testing is my build of PureNexus, due to its closeness to stock aosp and assortment of features. Please make sure the rom fits our needs if you are unfamiliar. No user-end features have been changed. Both of the roms are compiled with a custom SaberMod 4.9 toolchain and DragonTC 3.9.

Obligatory "im not responsible if you brick your device"

The Experiment:

There are 2 builds that will be in the link downloads folder, Test A and Test B. There is one change between the two, in fact, it's just one Boolean value. Please help by downloading and flashing them, and reporting your experience.

The Rules:

Run each build for at least 1 day

Use your normal kernel with your normal settings

Please don't use xposed

Include your favorite benchmark and examples of differences (ex. app opening is slower/faster)

The experiment will end April 15th, please submit your results by then

The Downloads:

https://basketbuild.com/devs/frap129/Nexus%206%28shamu%29/Test

Thanks in advanced! The changes I made and the difference between the two will be released after the experiment ends!
[Nexus 6  General] frap129:
Reserved for results and such
[Nexus 6  General] mrjiggywiggy:
I'd love to flash this and test it out, but I'm going to need a bit more info. What are the changes you made? Also, if I do flash, is a full wipe necessary before I try the first as well as in-between the two?
[Nexus 6  General] najoor:
It seems that a lot of what you are trying to test (benchmark, lag, possibly battery life) is a strong function of the kernel and not the ROM. So if your are asking the people to use their own kernel I'm not sure the feedback you get is comparable from person to person.

Also, as mentioned in the past above, it helps if you explain what these roms are, what they are based on, if you have complied them yourself or not, do they have any built in features different from stock, etc.
[Nexus 6  General] frap129:
The point of the experiment is to be a double blind test, therefore I would prefer not to say what change has been made. I have compiled both of these from source using SaberMod 4.9 and DragonTC 3.9, if that helps you at all. Thanks for your interest.

Your first statement is part of why I want to do this. Because the change was not to the kernel, any increase in performance should be maintained regardless of the kernel, though it may vary. In regards to your second statement, I stated in the OP that they are my builds of PureNexus. Obviously, no features were changed to remain consistent for the sake of the test. Nonetheless, thank you for your input. I will add more info to the OP
[Nexus 6  General] NLBeev:
You should tell !
[Nexus 6  General] konradit:
Will flash A tomorrow and B the day after tomorrow in a MultiROM (need Android N this week)

Also, any interest in a revival of G Watch developing?
[Nexus 6  General] frap129:
I will once the experiment is over!

Thanks for the help! and not at the moment. I had started working on a new rom, but then 6.0 came out and I had to scrap most of my work. Maybe when I get a little more free time.
[Nexus 6  General] NLBeev:
OK. You are using the 'placebo effect'.

The user/patient may think it works. But in practice more that 50% may become unsatisfied.

Good luck with the experiment!
[Nexus 6  General] frap129:
Nope, for this to be placebo I would have to say which one should work better for the user to believe that it actually works better. There is a legitimate difference between the two, but one is not necessarily "better"
[Nexus 6  General] zelendel:
You are gonna be hard pressed for people to test this out with the vague way you put it. Let alone using those 2 useless tool chains. Many wont look twice just because of those.

Also one boolean change is not gonna make any real diff.
[Nexus 6  General] frap129:
Neither of them are useless, and this one boolean actually caused a major difference by changing the way that ART is compiled and targeted for a device. Please don't spread ignorant garbage without a little thought. It only hurts the community.
[Nexus 6  General] zelendel:
I'm not. Many developers have already called out the so called tool chains making a big diff. Why do you think none of the temp use them?

Either way good luck to you
[Nexus 6  General] adm1jtg:
to avoid all the arguing would it be possible for you to make 2 builds one pure untouched aosp with pure untouched aosp kernel and the other with just your one change based off the first? Seems that would simplify things greatly
[Nexus 6  General] frap129:
Well then I would have to download AOSP source code, which would take about a day with my internet speeds (and im not that patient lol). I honestly don't understand why using PureNexus is a problem.
[Nexus 6  General] zelendel:
You have to understand that people will not run a rom just to test something that most devs say are placebo.

A few months ago tool chains were all the talk and people found out for themselves.
[Nexus 6  General] frap129:
As I stated before, the difference between the two builds is not a toolchain, both use the same ones.
[Nexus 6  General] gammaxgoblin:
I imagine self reporting will be .... Anecdotal and skewed. Unless a person does exactly the same things in the same amount, error will ensue. Also use will likely vary moreso between a typical weekday and a Friday. If he dataset is big and diverse enough, these can be considered nominal but that means many hundreds of instances at the least. How do u plan to normalize the data, will there be measures of dispersion published?.... Don't mean to be that guy but unless u control the controls the results will not be robust and conclusive. I want to see this work and not have people's impressions be skewed by systemic flaws! I'm all about empirical evidence and ROM development and promotion are laden with unverifiable claims about performance and battery life. "Benchmarks don't matter" is all I hear. I would love to see standardized testing with repeatable data producing unbiased comparisons so the mystery is removed and claims are verifiable.
[Nexus 6  General] adm1jtg:
Guess the test is over with few to no takers.
[Nexus 6  General] adm1jtg:
Nothing
[Nexus 6  General] mikaole:
I am dl right now. Will test both clean tomorrow.

If you still need a result.
[Xperia Z5 General] korom42:
Hi all,

Well what I can see is that there are no custom roms developed for the Xperia Z5 , they are very very few

by the way, I would like to give very special thanks to :

[MENTION=2112104]auras76[/MENTION] : for his amazing "RomAur" ROM

[MENTION=3253248]celderic[/MENTION] : for the great "SlimStock" ROM ( I'm using it right now )

[MENTION=5169444]AndroPlus[/MENTION] : for the hardwork he done to make good kernels for the Z5

And for sure [MENTION=3037651]zacharias.maladroit[/MENTION], [MENTION=6584695]CTXz[/MENTION], [MENTION=6791680]_LLJY[/MENTION] and all the the Xperia Z5 and Sony devices developers who works in improving and optimizing our devices to get the best of them .

Back to the topic, I'm saying that because you can't get the full of your phone after rooting if you don't have many ROMs choices :crying: .

Most flagship devices of these days like the Nexus 6P and the Galaxy S6 have a very good development and you can choose between a wide variety of custom roms and mods .

I remember that every devices line had some famous roms, like the

'Android Revolution HD'

for samsung's

and the

'ViperOne'

for HTC's, besides AOSP ROMs like Resurrection Remix and slim rom or the popular cyanogenmod ROMS

The Z5 is my first root experience with a sony device , and it has been a bit weird and different than other devices .

I remember even for my old my old galaxy and LG handsets I had the choice to try so many ROMS and have fun with them

You think that the Z5 is stilll a new device ? Oh c'mon It was released in 2015

Maybe the Xperia Z5 is not enough popular ? Or it is maybe difficult to port ROMs for this device :confused:

I am not an expert developer so I can't say much about that :(

What about creating a team for development purposes ?

I think they already introduced that in the general sony devices section

[Announcement]Building a team, which WILL twist Sony Development

Or maybe you have better ideas, let us know what you think , cheers :cowboy:
[Xperia Z5 General] _LLJY:
I think the reason why there has not been much development is because the Z5 isn't easy to develop for and the AOSP kernel source and drivers (especially the camera ones) still need to be worked on by Sony, I guess we have to wait.
[Xperia Z5 General] zacharias.maladroit:
Exactly:

http://developer.sonymobile.com/201...-camera-available-for-experienced-developers/
[Windows Mobile Software Development] Cotulla:
ROM Extractor 1.0

This program can extract modules from ROM.

Program only can extract modules (exe,dll,cpl,...)

(files which have FILE_ATTRIBUTE_ROMMODULE)

but not designed to copy other ROM files, like bmp.

You can copy other ROM files by using a file manager.

Program can handle both XIP and EXTIMAGE files.

You should understand that all files comes without relocations.

They are stripped from image and not stored in ROM at all.

(Most of EXE files works fine)

Compatible:

Should work with Windows CE 4.2 and Windows CE 5.0.

Tested in WM 2003 SE and WM 5.0.

Please report about WM 2003 and WM 6.0.

Interface

*Enter path to module

You should enter path to module, always \Windows\... ?

*Save to:

You should enter output filename.

*"Set security offset to zero"

clear security RVA and size fields.

*"Set fixup offset to zero"

clear relocations RVA and size fields.

*"..." button

you can chouse file from list.

Double click on item will select it, "OK" will close.

Program set some fields to:

Linker version = 8.0

Operating system version = 4.0

Image version = 0.0

Stack commit = 4096

Heep commit = 4096

Heap reserve = 0x100000

Also you will have resources in .pdata section.

(This will be fixed in the next release)
[Windows Mobile Software Development] Ebenezer:
Thank you for your program.

Would you change the font of this program?

MS Shell Dlg -> Tahoma..
[Windows Mobile Software Development] crusher:
the program is great.

however you should consider adding a default output path (say, "\") for those like me tampering with a CE.NET device with no chance yet to activate "Input Panel".
[Windows Mobile Software Development] mrhayami:
wm6.1

It seems to work just fine in wm6.1 as well.

However I do agree with crusher;

"however you should consider adding a default output path (say, "\") for those like me tampering with a CE.NET device with no chance yet to activate "Input Panel"."
[Windows Mobile Software Development] nursemm05:
ok I'm having a blond moment... what is my save to path if I want to save to my SD card? I tried '\storage card\' and \storage card\my documents\ and neither worked. Help me help my brain work this early in the morning! :) thanks
[Windows Mobile Software Development] Kajoe:
This one works great too: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=2122307

For extracting NBH files
[Windows Mobile Software Development] egzthunder1:
How do you dump the file back in \Windows? I am modifying shellres.dll.0409.mui to change the "Start" word (String Data 321 if you are interested - Thank you joemanb), but I cannot place the file back. I have tried using both Explorer and Resco 2008 without any luck. Any ideas will be much appreaciated.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] patr!k:
use Active Sync
[Windows Mobile Software Development] egzthunder1:
I realized it after playing with it for a while. Thanks anyway.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] wapvirus:
Thanks This App is great just messed with photoshop n made a icon for your program if you like it
[Windows Mobile Software Development] harrispo:
Is there an update for this program?

Preferably one where you can select multiple files at once and don't have to type in EVERY output filename (it's much slower when you can't copy-paste on the Touch HD)
[Windows Mobile Software Development] obaz:
do not work.

can`t create output file
[Windows Mobile Software Development] aatnet:
active sync as in XP? how can one do it in Vista? The device's Windows folder is not visible in desktop explorer
[Windows Mobile Software Development] aatnet:
Actually i found a way to view the device's windows folder in Vista but the mui file is read-only with no way of changing that. How can i replace it in Vista. PLEASE help !
[Windows Mobile Software Development] Isobuster_1962:
Worked for me. Get the Notify.dll.0407.mui without any problems extracted... :D
[Windows Mobile Software Development] DexterTan:
i keeep getting cant create output file.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] Bparan:
you wil have to type the full name of what u whant to copy

\StorageCard\Stuff\shellres.dll.0409.mui
[Windows Mobile Software Development] J0nas:
it's amazing!! works perfect with WM6.5!

Congratulations and many thanks!
[Windows Mobile Software Development] empewoow:
I'm getting that message too. What are we doing wrong? (Screenshot in attachment.)
[Windows Mobile Software Development] mirskym:
You have to also type in the full path and file name for where you want to store it.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] stylez:
Remove the \ and it will extract to root of device memory.

eg: shellres.192.dll in Save to will extract to root of device memory
[Windows Mobile Software Development] empewoow:
Thanks... What the hell that was easy ;/
[Windows Mobile Software Development] wg5566:
A way to copy files back.

Edit: And if I found the security policy issue is involved, will update later on.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] ElCondor:
This program should get more attention, it works very good, I cannot understand why no one knows it.

Bump.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] gpg:
Thank you, this helped me get my shellres.96.dll file on my wm6.1 atlas. Worked very well!
[Windows Mobile Software Development] mike2nl:
Hi @all,

i have a liitle problem with the app...

on my phone HTC Touch Pro 2 (2 weeks old)

i can't find the shellres.192.dll in the list

browser from the app. When i type

\Windows\shellres.192.dll

i can't use the extract button. He is light grey.

The dll is original a rom file. On the phone from

my wife i have checked with TC. He says ROM File.

Has someone an idea about that?
[Windows Mobile Software Development] woomg:
Hi,

Some of files can not be extracted correctly. For example, App_Service.dll was extracted with file size is only 416 byte, it's original size is about 150K.

no more update this tool? or any alternative on this site?

Thanks,

woomg:(
[Windows Mobile Software Development] haideepu_2258:
Thanks a lot

Thanks a lot for great Program.

I have been digging in net for similar program and tried 100s of tools. Fortunately, I got this tool today. I was searching for something else and found this tool. Can someone put it most easily accessible place?

Thanks a looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot. :)
[Windows Mobile Software Development] TheRem:
thanks Cotulla! this is really useful. :)

for those having a hard time extracting... this is how...
[Windows Mobile Software Development] polarbjørn:
bronzeres.dll

Hi I have been trying now for 2 days to extract a bronzeres.dll file. But I dont see the file in the list that ROMExtractor shows me. Im a bit of a noob at this customisation thing. What am I missing why isnt the bronzeres.dll file in the list..
[Windows Mobile Software Development] stylez:
Should just be able to copy bronzeres.dll via Total Commander or even async ;) Might need to change to default screen so as file not in use. "on my Dash i can just copy file"
[Windows Mobile Software Development] polarbjørn:
I copied the file then unsigned it, modified it then resigned it. But i can not reinsert it into windows folder. So i thought I could remove it with ROMExtractor and then replace it with the modified one. Would that work?? But why cant I see it in ROMExtractor list?
[Windows Mobile Software Development] stylez:
You should be able to copy over with Total Commander, change to standard windows home before hand, if not try this change to standard home use Total Commander and change the bronzeres.dll name to bronzeres.bak copy the bronzeres.dll into windows then restart phone delete the bronzeres.bak file.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] polarbjørn:
It wont let me rename it in TotalCommander.

Managed to rename it bronzeres.bak1. But then it made 2 files in windows bronzeres.dll and bronzeres.bak1.
[Windows Mobile Software Development] andreatozzi:
icons

Which is the .dll file that includes the standard WM 6.1 program icons (EX: Comm manager, camera, straming media, windows live windows media ecc..) ?

Ciao
[Windows Mobile Software Development] 4tune:
Took this old lady to work, but she didn't do the job on some dll files at my HD2. The extracted file is not the same as the original.

Are there any further developments or better solutions out there?
[Windows Mobile Software Development] aitbenassil:
Thanks

Thanks​

:)
[Windows Mobile Software Development] GuitaristSV:
This app is really useful, Thanks :)
[Windows Mobile Software Development] xangmou:
shellres.dll.0409.mui

Hi

I still have the same problem, I cannot copy shellres.dll.0409.mui in \Windows? How to do with ActiveSync? Or ROM Extarctor Or with Resco? I'm looking for since 2 days and I would be very HAPPY if I can do it...

Thank you for helping

Xangmou
[Windows Mobile Software Development] oznprlk:
No word Win7.Please sharing to win7 versiyon.. .