yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[X Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] coldtech:
Thanks for the link, I somehow did not find that before!
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
My mobile is A311, rooted (with Kingroot) and loaded with MIUI v5.10 stable version. I was trying to load the Coolpad compatible MIUI v6.2.

As part of this process I'd tried to ise TWRP v3.x to disable Syste, Data to be unchanged before loading the custom firmware. For some reason I was unable to complete this process. So I thought of completely follow the steps given in the original thread.

So I'd decided to downgrade TWRP to v2.8 via Mobile Uncle. The mobile was restarted as part of this process and got into Factory mode. Since then I'd followed multiple steps including back to Stock ROM. But there was no success as the mobile is not detectable via fastboot. The mobile is detected in ADB but as unauthorised. When tried with YGDP the phone was detected but it was unable to switch it to download/flash mode.

Please help me to get this issue resolved. I'm completely stuck with this issue. Thanks a ton for every one's understanding help prompt help/suggestion/support
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] bravonova:
R u able to boot in recovery??
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
Thanks a lot for your reply.

I don't see any option to do so. I feel its just a small step which I'm missing by which I should be able to get back my phone into the original shape. But I'm unable to do so. Can you please suggest the steps so that I can try and share the results.
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] solankirohit37:
Remove the battery, press the vol. Up button and power button together to get to recovery mode
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
Thanks for the reply. I've tried the below options and attached the behavior as well

* With battery --> Press Vol+, Vol- and Power button --> Shows factory mode at the top with twice fastboot mode at the bottom

* With out battery and connected with power cable --> Press Vol+, Vol- and Power button --> no reaction from the phone

* With out battery and not connected with power cable --> Press Vol+, Vol- and Power button --> no reaction from the phone

Please help!
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] bravonova:
you need to take it to nearest micromax service center
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
OMG! Isn't there any other option to solve the software issue? Plz help.
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
No hope from MMX SC as well!!

I've taken to MMX SC as well. The response from them is, it has got some board problem which requires replacement. I was wondering how come a S/W issue can cause a board problem? And I've taken it back. Please help me, its really killing my patience ;(
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] shaijuvjohn:
Install ygdp and drivers in a new computer and try flashing again. I had same problem before, phone was not detecting in ygdp.

Check this http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=61627581&postcount=8
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
Detected in Shell/SU

Thank you so much for your reply. I'll try your suggestion and update.

Meanwhile, I've tried some options and got luck in get into Shell as well as SU/ROOT (as it's rooted already with MIUI ROM). Please help me the steps and ways to recover my phone from here.

Note: I don't have any definitive steps how I've got into adb shell detectable state for my phone. If you can help me on the definitive steps then I can be confident in first taking few backups. If no other choice then I'd to flash only using the steps suggested by [MENTION=5992635]shaijuvjohn[/MENTION]
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] shaijuvjohn:
I don't know how to operate through shell. So there is no comments. Just google it, may be you will get some info.
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
Able to connect to the device now :)

Thanks [MENTION=5992635]shaijuvjohn[/MENTION] for your suggestion. I've followed the thread and wiped the drivers n tried connecting. Voila. Able to detect the device in YGDP as well as in adb shell/su.

* adb shell/su - unable to access /sdcard with permission denied on cd /sdcard. Also when tried to remount as rw also failed with mount operation not permitted/failed.

* so I've left with flashing stock ROM which I've used it in the past few times. But the same CPB file is not working now with the following error. Please help. I'm dying to resolve the issue.

15:58:22 CELL0: Verify is Partition be Changed.

15:58:22 CELL0: Partition is Changed.

15:58:22 CELL0: Get Usb Status Success.

15:58:22 CELL0: Read YL-Parames Partition Start.

15:58:24 CELL0: Read YL-Parames Partition Success.

15:58:24 CELL0: Check between YL-Parames Partition and PhoneInfo Start.

15:58:24 CELL0: Check between YL-Parames Partition and PhoneInfo Failed.Error Code:18

15:58:24 CELL0: Check YL-Parames Partition Failed, The CPB is not for the Phone.

15:58:24 CELL0: DisConnect.

15:58:44 CELL0: Total download time elapsed: 0 min : 25 sec

15:58:44 CELL0: Downloading CPB: Failed!

Again, my current mobile which was last time working was on MMX A311 hardware and software kernel 4.4.2,cwm v3,MiUi-7 for A311 {5.10.15}.

I suspect the partition is set to either a310 or base partition of "MiUi-7 for A311". Please suggest a quick options to recover by bricked phone.
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] shaijuvjohn:
Download the cpb file for A311 from here http://www.needrom.com/download/micromax-a311/

When you flash the stock rom it will repalce the twrp also. We can easily install twrp through ygdp. Follow the steps.

1. Select your .cpb file and apply

2. YGDP will unzip the cpb file, path may be C:\YLXZGJ\YGDP\DownFiles\8297W (in my system this is the path, please check after unzipping)

3. Check the unzipped folder contents

4. There will be a file named recovery.img

5. Delete the recovery.img file

6. Copy your twrp recovery to the unzipped folder and rename it to recovery.img

7. Click on start button

8. Remove battery from your phone and connect it to the usb

9. It will detect your phone and start flashing

10. Wait for flashing finishes to 100 %

11. Done. Disconnect phone and turn on it. You flashed stock rom with twrp recovery

12. Copy the backup to memory card and insert it in phone

12. Insert battery and press power button and volume up key, go to twrp recovery, restore your backup and enjoy

Follow the instructions and try this.
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
Still no luck

I've followed the steps exactly as listed. But issue remains same.

* YGDP --> progress grows quickly to 98% but at 98% it shows failed with the dump

* SP Flash tool --> tried with only recovery.img (TWRP), excluding userdata.img and so on till all items in the list. But everything shows BROM ERROR : $_BROM_CMD_JUMP_DA_FAIL (2035) alert only.

Please help. With your inputs I feel I'm very close to the last mile to recover my bricked phone. Please help me to complete the last mile.
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
PhoneInfo.yl?

I've read from other threads that the PhoneInfo.yl would contain the "ProductName = 8297W_I02" for A311. While choosing the cpb under the Config tab, I'm unable to see 8297W_I02. So I've chosen 8297W. But post the extraction of A311's 4.4.2*.cpb I can see the PhoneInfo.yl contains 8297W_I02 only.

Not sure whether the information in the phone is the same as the one the extracted cpb. But I can clearly associate the last step which is failing indicates from my last post that

"15:58:24 CELL0: Check between YL-Parames Partition and PhoneInfo Failed.Error Code:18

15:58:24 CELL0: Check YL-Parames Partition Failed, The CPB is not for the Phone."

As per the current operating system which is MIUI v7 5.10.15 or 5.10.22 should I change it to something else prior flashing the cpb?

Please correct my understanding as well. Eagerly waiting for your reply to resolve the issue.
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
Wrong TWRP with no bootloader/fastboot/recovery

I could think of downgrading the TWRP from v3.x to v2.8. But I just recalled and when able to successfully connect to the device via ADB, I could conclude I've flashed wrong TWRP (via MobileUncle) has caused the issue. When I'm able to connect the ADB Shell the prompt is showing "shell-GT-N7000". How can I resolve the issue now?

Should I install the GT-N7000 driver and give a try to flash the stock ROM?
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] sugarmurali:
Still waiting for the help!

Please help me out here. I'm really stuck in fixing the problem. Thanks in-advance for the understanding and your prompt support.
[Micromax Canvas Nitro A310/A311] ash6338:
same issue

I also hv been stucked in bootloop phone is stucked i even dont know how to fix it even service centre cant fixed that plz help me i am in massive problem
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] selbyftw:
Hey guys, can anyone run some basic benchmarks like geekbench and antutut and post them here? Would like to see what the phone score with the carrier bloatware and stuff. If you do it's much appreciated but could you post your cpu too 820 or 8890? Thanks guys
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] daLareid:
You can ask for it here

http://xdaforums.com/s7-edge/help/exynos-snapdragon-t3322784

There's already some scores available in there.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] mocsab:
I am at work on my work PC so I can't upload a screen shot but Antutu Benchmark score 100% stock - 122,019 I usually have been getting around 92,000 on my Nexus 6p - rooted and tweaked with ac custom kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] brouwerchris:
Most results so far : Snapdragon 820 = Antutu 120 -122000

Exynos = Antutu 127 - 129000

On Geekbench Snapdragon slightly better on single core,Exynos slightly better on multi core. So only marginal differences in benchmark results.

In daily use both are blazing fast ...
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] aaronc_98:
Best yet for me... it is no exynos, but I will take it :)
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] mocsab:
My note 5 has exynos and I haven't been able to get more than 92,000 or so - honestly the benchmarks don't mean much - maybe they make us feel good a little - but in the end, the real test is how it performs in real life and honestly all of these Flagship phones are pretty amazing. I am really impressed with the S7 - and other than a little bloat, I don't find much to complain about with the new Touchwiz/Marshmallo in the S7 Edge. AND I love the expanded features for the Edge itself...really nice phone.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Jayster0966:
Only the second day on this phone. I like it!

Sent from my SM-G935T using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Just a casual run on the snapdragon version. Didn't cool it or anything
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] selbyftw:
Wow those are some great runs guys, the geekbench is a little lower than expected. On certain s6 roms I've gotten about 5100 on multicore, but for stock those seem pretty good.

Is the general consensus that both cpu's are as good as each other with both slightly out performing one in certain areas?
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] TANKRED_ENDURES:
Can someone run gfxbench battery test on snapdragon and upload performance graphs here. Interesting to see gpu performance degradation.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] the baptizer:
Can someone please run a workbench from PCmark?

That is the most usefull benchmark at the moment

thanks in advance
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Just keep in mind the s6 has 8 cores to throw at it. Thats why its multicore score holds up well. Once we consider the single core score and that the 820 only has 4 cores its rather impressive.

I ran pcmark and got about 6k last night. Just keep in mind that pcmark is much more representative of the governor's ability to react to loads etc, than a representation of raw power. If you ran it on performance governor for instance, the score would be much higher.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Hopefully these show you what you want
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] TANKRED_ENDURES:
wow, it looks like exynos 8890 have better sustained performance, kinda surprasing

http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=707315&view=findpost&p=47363269
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
I have no clue what that site says....
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] peachpuff:
Surprising? The ghost of the 810 still haunts the 820 a bit.

Here's the exynos, notice that it stays above 2.5ghz till around the 21 minute mark, while the sd820 starts throttling after 6 minutes.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
I just wish I understood the metric. It's not GHz because the GPUs only run around 650mhz. From what i can tell the adreno is much higher peak then suddenly drops for a second and jumps back up. Which seems weird if it's throttling. Normally it would go low and stay low, like the 8890 does in the graph. I'll have to compare to my s6 later. Test takes forever.....
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] TANKRED_ENDURES:
Its not GHz, it's number of frames in one iteration of test. I suspect thermal driver in snapdragon variant is maybe broken, because It's weird what performance halfed every 2 minutes. In real games it would be noticeable.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] stone5000556:
Can't say I'm dissapionted with my 820 s7e. Great real world performance and benchmarks very well.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] selbyftw:
I'm the uk so I'll be getting the 8890, from what I can see from you guys both chips are good but I think the sd820 may have some thermal isssues again. Both score very well in real world performance. If your sd820 gets really hot at least you can dip it in some iced water now ;)
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Umm side by side my s6 is about equal launching apps. Which makes complete sense... Also it makes sense that the differences would be extrapolated when benching off screen, your running at way higher frame rates so the difference is much larger. When you are on screen and only pushing 20fps the difference will not be as large. Why would they detect and boost the performance only off screen...doesn't even make sense, and that's not how that kind of stuff works anyways. Qcom doesn't code benchmark cheats, Samsung does. And it's basic stuff like turning the governor to performance when it detects antutu or something. If that were the case the exynos would have it to.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] hlenforcer:
Your s6, as well as your s7 are capable of much faster app opening times. The problem is TouchWiz, even a moto x play reaching 36k points in antutu launches many apps faster... So using a proper optimized aosp rom would show the differences between the SoCs if it comes to this topic...

Facepalm... No, ofc the difference relatively remains the same, if the difference is 10% at 20fps we talk about 2fps difference and at 40 it are 4fps... Now look at the results again and you see that the calculation doesn't match... I studied IT for a long period of time and I see no other conclusion than cheating...
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] johanbiff:
Just ran antutu 5.7.3 Can you do the same and upload the results? Just a fun thing to see imo.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Beefheart:
Sucks? Probably the most ridicuulous statement I've ever read on here and it has some competition. Tell you what, find a single 3D game on Android that has a discernable performance gain on the SD over the Exynos and I'll believe you have a point worth bothering with. Good luck.

Sent from my Vic 20 disguised as a Galaxy S7 Edge
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Both the s6 and s7 are running touchwiz so it's equal playing field. As for the cheating, I just took a look through some of the GPU kernel source code and see nothing that would detect a specific application and somehow boost performance. Again it doesn't even make sense why if they were somehow cheating, they would only cheat offscreen. That means the only place any "cheats" could be is in the rom, which has nothing to do with qcom. Also there's differences in rendering stuff offscreen besides the obvious. I would imagine things related to compression of display data and such come into play. Keep in mind that the 820 is a completely heterogenous SOC. Meaning all the pieces are designed to work together under the control of the symphony system manager. One aspect of this is that the CPU and GPU are able to look into each other's caches. This no doubt helps the GPU performance on the SD beyond the extra capabilities of the GPU alone.

---------- Post added at 02:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:06 AM ----------

Sure thing I'll DL it tomorrow when j get up and give it a run. It's late here. Have a link to the apk?
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] hlenforcer:
Offscreen-cheating makes a lot of sense, because most relevant gpu bench is gfx bench which is used Offscreen very often + it is only 1 line in kernel source or gpu driver. This is my first sammy/exynos device, before I had 4 htc/qc devices and even for onscreen calculation a single cmd at build prop was enough to boost gpu performance at 40% with somehow cheating. So if I see this inconsistencies in results, this is the first which comes into my mind. Just every advantage of adreno named here in the thread has to perform onscreen exactly in the same way like offscreen so I read still no alternative explanation for inconsistent high offscreen performance...

They cheat gfx bench... Take it... And it just doesn't matter because both devices perform very well in real scenarios...

Usually I wouldn't jump in such a discussion because I know especially gpu performance will change a lot in the next months due to updated gpu drivers

Gesendet von meinem SM-G935F mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] johanbiff:
http://www.apkmirror.com/apk/antutu.../antutu-benchmark-5-7-3-android-apk-download/

I did notice that it`s caps due to 60hz refresh rate(60FPS)so this maybe won`t tell us anything but just a fun thing to see the differance between the 5 and 6 version.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] guenni72:
GFX Bench OpenGL

[IMG="GFX Bench OpenGL"]https://www.dropbox.com/s/zc7dgnxc06dwf4b/GFX%20Bench%20OpenGL.jpg?dl=0[/IMG]

Antutu

[IMG="Antutu"]https://www.dropbox.com/s/fx6mkpq7rfx5yu6/Antutu.jpg?dl=0[/IMG]

Geekbench

[IMG="Geekbench"]https://www.dropbox.com/s/iilgomogzo3cy9w/Geekbench.png?dl=0[/IMG]

Geekbench Battery

[IMG="Geekbench Battery"]https://www.dropbox.com/s/dkfhqicxf58s4av/Geekbench%20Battery.png?dl=0[/IMG]
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Here ya go. Like you said though, graphics stuff will probably be same since there's a cap and it pretty much runs 60fps whole time.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Pilz:
I ran one too just in case people try to say it's somehow not accurate :)
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Webtag:
Look at this ****

Sent fra min SM-G935F via Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Prob just warm and throttling. Try letting it sit for awhile and then running.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Webtag:
This was right after playing Thumb Drift[emoji1] Got this now

Sent fra min SM-G935F via Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Lol well that's odd. Nice score.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] the Doctor:
GSM Arena has compared the Exynos 8890 vs SD820 benchmarks now.

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s7_edge-review-1409p6.php

tl;dr The SD820 wins single core, Exynos 8890 wins multi-core. In Antutu, they are pretty close. SD820 appears to have a slightly more powerful GPU. Both are quite future-proof.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] CLARiiON:
Better wait for Anandtech to do proper analysis. I am more interested in sustained performance rather than a single 'burst' performance. Obviously batterylife matters most.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Pilz:
Battery life isn't the most important if the phone can't open apps without stuttering so there needs to be a balance.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] CLARiiON:
Don't care about few frame drops here and there. Offcourse batterylife is way more important than that, not even a question. Batterylife, camera and display are most important parameters for me as well as many people.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] jbfountain:
My SD 820 S7 Edge gets me though the day, and I'm a pretty heavy user. Plus with fast charging and wireless fast charging it's very easy to add a little juice if the battery gets a little low, so performance matters a little more to me. I'm sure both the Exynos and Snapdragon processors are plenty fast and battery life is sufficient for both versions. I would have liked to see how these phones scored with Lollipop, as Marshmallow has greatly increased the speed of many of the phones that came with Lollipop.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] jok3r4u:
Have you seen that the 1,8 GHz SD found in Xiaomi Mi5 gets same scores in benchmarks like the standard SD version found in S7? ? Best SOC ever...
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] midreestaj:
s6 exynos opens apps faster than s7 sd820
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Xileforce:
Side by side mine was about equal, but it would make sense if it was. It has higher multithreaded performance.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] iamslark:
Hi Guys. Can anyone help me why mine is very low compare to others?

nvm. i tried again and the score is 117194

[IMG="Benchmark"]http://i539.photobucket.com/albums/ff351/tophi45/12887445_10205884869301192_1503239371_o_zpsqakwxtgo.jpg[/IMG]
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] henklbr:
Phone about 36hr active (NO reboot), WiFi/4G+/Bluetooth/Data ON
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Okarina26:
i think that score isnt that bad for exynos..!!
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Crxsenate:
Here is my bench USA snapdragon after a day at work streaming music all day
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Crxsenate:
Not sure how said it. Put phone in freezer and run test. I put it in 5 minutes start test put it back in. Score 44xxx didn't work I was expecting to beat last test but I think I literally froze my phone
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Pilz:
I've done a freezer test but it wasn't much better than my usual score, so
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] Crxsenate:
I

When I pulled it out the screen was frosted like a window on a car in winter i really hope I didn't freeze it too bad lol
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] gagan313:
Yeah I did a cold water benchmark vs normal room temperature benchmark and it made no differece.

This is because the exynos versions never needs to thermal throttle while benchmarking. The only time it will help is if you have been running high end games for about 3 hours striaght, then the phone will BEgin to heat up and potentially throttle.
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] PapaMag:
What's Your BenchMark???

I have found that my benchmarks keep going up and even though we can't get root or unlocked bootloader I'm not so sure I care anymore. If there was a way for me to eliminate ads in my apps I know I wouldn't.

Here's my latest BenchMark
[Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Guides, News, & Discussion] meyerweb:
My benchmark is how the phone feels in normal use, not an artificial app that has nearly nothing to do with my normal use of the phone.