yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Honor 7 General] N0rki:
Anyway...can i get back to stock firmware ?

I don't want to try it on my own to mess up with phone again.
[Honor 7 General] N0rki:
Soo...tried local update but everytime it just boot to honor logo and after that reboot to TWRP

Help ? pls ? :D
[Honor 7 General] piskr:
You shouldn't have any TWRP and you shouldn't have rooted phone in order to flash the local update. Please read instructions, there are plenty of them in this forum. Now you must flash stock B188 and after that without modification B320 as a local update. You may need to flash B188 from computer via fastboot.
[Honor 7 General] N0rki:
Ok thx, Iam pretty new in this world of mobile ...so sorry if i sometimes act like dumb :D
[Samsung Galaxy Express GT-I8730 Questions & Answer] cyberc5:
HELP ME!

MY PHONE DIED. I WAS USING WhatsApp and hung up

IS IN QHSUSB_DLOAD, HARD BRICKED

I WAS USING CM11 4.4 ,

GT-i8730L
[Samsung Galaxy Express GT-I8730 Questions & Answer] cyberc5:
SOLUTION?
[Samsung Galaxy Express GT-I8730 Questions & Answer] cyberc5:
I NEED debrick image GT-i8730L
[Samsung Galaxy Express GT-I8730 Questions & Answer] cyberc5:
ODIN:

<ID:0/003> Added!!

<ID:0/003> Odin v.3 engine (ID:3)..

<ID:0/003> File analysis..

<ID:0/003> SetupConnection..

<ID:0/003> Initialzation..

<ID:0/003> Set PIT file..

<ID:0/003> DO NOT TURN OFF TARGET!!

<ID:0/003> Get PIT for mapping..

<ID:0/003>

<ID:0/003> There is no PIT partition.

<OSM> All threads completed. (succeed 0 / failed 1)

PHONE:

BOOT RECOVERY MODE

CHECK BOOT PARTITTONS. .

COPY FROM T-FLASH. .

FLASH READ FAILURE

ODIN MODE

PRODUCT NAME: GT-I8730

CUSTOM BINARY DOWNLOAD: No

CURRENT BINARY: Samsung Official

SYSTEM STATUS: NONE

QUALCOMM SECUREBOOT: ENABLE

SECURE CHECK FAIL: PIT

ERROR: There is no pit binary.
[Samsung Galaxy Express GT-I8730 Questions & Answer] cyberc5:
help me
[Samsung Galaxy Express GT-I8730 Questions & Answer] Perseus:
Duplicate of	[HELP-ME] MY GT-i8730 HARD BRICKED QHSUSB_DLOAD

Closed.
[Security Discussion] nutpants:
Most things that restrict actions in Android use the applications uuid to identity it.

UUID is an immutable representation of a 128-bit universally unique identifier (UUID).

However recently I installed firefox and firefox beta..

Both share the same uuid..

And when I installed firefox beta. It gained all the rights and permissions and internet access that firefox had..

Both applications are installed on my device both run separately

But I cannot secure one with out the other getting the same security access.

If you look at system files many of them have the same uuid

That is a huge security issue with Android..

Is there a way to assign a new uuid to a application

Even if you have to rebuild the apk?

(Almost everything I have is open-source so I can build it from scratch if required)
[Security Discussion] h4oxer:
In android, apps can share the UUID by declaring it in the manifest:

android:sharedUserId

The name of a Linux user ID that will be shared with other applications. By default, Android assigns each application its own unique user ID. However, if this attribute is set to the same value for two or more applications, they will all share the same ID — provided that they are also signed by the same certificate. Application with the same user ID can access each other's data and, if desired, run in the same process.

So if you just resign the APK with a different certificate (you can quickly generate one) they won't share the same ID anymore (because you don't have the mozilla certificate)
[Security Discussion] h4oxer:
And FYI, it is not a security issue. In fact, it is an added security measure. Because apps that need to communicate with each other can share the same memory space and filesystem. The security is based on the signature of the app. So it is as strong as your ability to not leak the certificate ;)
[Security Discussion] nutpants:
Except that many apps can be installed under the same id number.

If they where given a completely unique number for every app installed then I would agree

But that is not the case.

Multiple apps with the same id is just bad security

It's like giving two different people the same identification because they share an office.

I will look into resigning some apks and see what I can find.

Thank you for the info.
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
Signatures have nothing to do with uid. If you have the same app with a different signature, you will simply not be able to install them together. Uid has to do with app's internal name like com.xxx. Apps with the same internal name will always have the same uid (like firefox stable and beta) and different apps will always have different uid, except for some system apps that come from os makers, which is true for many, if not all os. A third party app will never have any of the system app uid. So, there is no security issue at all.
[Security Discussion] Primokorn:
ukanth talked about the android:sharedUserId attribute.

Android's documentation says that apps have to be signed by the same certificate.

Having the same package name (or a similar one) is not mandatory to share the same UID (example: dev tools & fused location).
[Security Discussion] nutpants:
Firefox and firefox beta..

Two similar apps

Same uid last time I installed both..

So a unscrupulous developer could create a separate app with separate functions with the same uid and if you installed it where would you be?

And god knows that no one ever has an issue with developers creating unscrupulous apps that try to get data from your device.
[Security Discussion] jackmcbarn:
He could only do that if both apps were his, and if both apps were his, he doesn't gain access to anything that he didn't already have access to.
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
Your scenario is impossible. Firefox can only obtain permission from another firefox and both must be made by the same developer. And Firefox cannot get permissions from apps made by others.
[Security Discussion] nutpants:
Firefox is an example.

But a similar situation could come from any developer.

Develop one good popular app

And one data mining, soul stripping life stealing app with the same uid and maybe even a hidden icon..

Personally I give apps only the access the need. Not what they ask for.

With marshmallow everyone can restrict information

But you can not when two apps share the same uid.

For example Firefox stable had no serious privacy holes

Firefox beta could. It's beta.

Two apps one uid..

Bad idea..
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
"Develop one good popular app. And one data mining, soul stripping life stealing app with the same uid and maybe even a hidden icon."

But that doesn't make any sense. If there is another (bad) app by the same developer with the same com.name, it will install only on top of the good one and it will be a totally different app. By the way, beta firefox shouldn't have the same uid as stable (unless they, as a big developer, have a special arrangements with Google, so that their certificate is preinstalled, but you don't really think that firefox would need another app to steal your data, they can do it anyway). Also, what's the point of having both firefox beta and stable? It is bad for system. Firefox is known to stay in the background after you exit it, unless you literally kill it with a specially configured back button. So, now, you have 2 web browsers in the background.
[Security Discussion] nutpants:
Check out Firefox and firefox beta..

Different names, different app.Same developer, Same uuid

Both together on your device at the same time.

Unless there is something wrong with my nexus

You can get both from Google play and see for yourself.

Which means that any developer could do it.

The next question would be how secure is the app signing method. Can it be duplicated? Coerced ? Or just commandeered by the fbi on the off chance some one committed a crime that could support terrorism.

Uuid sharing bad idea.

How does Android assign the uuid to each app?

And yes I test beta apps to see if they have fixed bugs that are present in stable

I support open source every chance I can.
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
Signing process cannot be replicated. However, if you use Google services (including Googleplay), then it is possible to have Google sign a modified application to take over your phone, but this could be defeated completely by removing google services and google services framework and using roms and apps that you have compiled by yourself. Moreover, before compiling, you will have to re-generate all build keys (test key, platform key and media key). In this case, the only way to take control over your phone would be over the air through the operator's sim card and if that fails, then through the king of all - baseband/modem...
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
Just to clear the record: previously I said that signatures make no difference to uid. This was not entirely correct.

Signatures identify a unique developer. Package name/internal app name identify a unique application. The only way an app can get a shared uid is if it has the same signature, i.e., made by the same developer. In other words, an app cannot have a shared uid with an app by another developer.

Now, security: apps using a shared uid share data/database with each other; they also share the same permissions. This creates no additional security threat.

Your example of a dev creating a good app and then adding a bad/data stealing app that would have the same permissions as the good one. This absolutely makes no sense, as data stealing features could be easily implemented in the good app. In addition, the bad app cannot have higher level permissions than the good one.

If you, however, don't want to have shared uid for 3rd party apps, there is an easy way do that: all you need is to sign any third party app with your own signature, which will prompt android to assign a different uid.
[Security Discussion] nutpants:
So if I sign firefox beta, it will automatically have a different uuid,

What happens is I also sign the original Firefox also?

Will that cause the uuids to again be the same or will they both be different?

Can a apk be signed from an Android device?

Is there any other way to change how Android assigns uuids to apps?

(Ie force Android to assign new uuids to every app, extract the rom and change the uuids on the apks so every apk have a truly unique id (which I would expect form something called universal unique id)

Why would anyone ever want a uuid to be shared with another app (Even system apps)?

Thanks for the info btw..
[Security Discussion] optimumpro:
In order to have a shared uid, both apps must have that permission in their manifests. Having this benefits performance and minimizes space on the device. Since android apps run in a sandbox/virtual machine, you can imagine the slowdown if you have system apps with unique uids.

You shouldn't sign the other firefox with the same key , as you will defeat your purpose.

I am not aware of a procedure to sign the app on the device, however, you can search xda. You can certainly sign the app on linux or windows. You can also generate multiple keys for signing.
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ware84:
ive had help in rom section but unable to get the rom installed trying to install the ultimate note 5 rom ok i follow op instructions tried muti twrp and the lastest philz ever time i flash the rom i get a error 7 code tried muti formatted sd cards tried putting on phone storage then flashing still same error.. ive read on the error 7 a little bit about it look in the updater script dont see the line it says to erase,ive flash other rom no problem but this 1 keeps failing with that error the picture says twrp 2.8.6 did it just to try out but im on twrp 3.0 now when i got the phone it was already on 5.1.1 ok1
[Sprint  Galaxy Note 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tx_dbs_tx:
I will be as specific and give as much detail as i can here...

You need to start over with a clean slate. Use standard class 10 micro-sd card and don't mess with multi format whatever. Use TWRP 2.8.7 or 3.0.0. Start by rebooting into recovery and wiping everything clean several times. backup any files that you need to keep. But you must wipe internal sd, system, cache, data and dalvic-cache. wipe thenm in advanced wipe options of twrp. Next reboot to download mode. Launch odin 3.10.6 or newer on your pc. connect your phone to your pc via the usb cable. In the options tab of odin make sure auto-reboot and reset time is CHECKED!!! Open the official stock OK1 rom tar using the AP button in odin. Once the md5 check completes just press start to flash the stock rom. when it finishe LET THE PHONE REBOOT!!! Once the phone boots, setup as usual then go into Settings and open "Activate this device". Let it do it's thing and it will automatically reboot. Once the phone reboots, go to settings/System update and do the prl AND profile updates. Reboot your phone again. Then make sure your data and calls work as they should.

Once you are on stock and have done all of these steps above you are ready to odin TWRP. Download the tar version of TWRP to use in odin. It is the best way to flash recoveries. Launch odin on your pc and use the AP button to add the TWRP tar. In the options tab you can uncheck auto reboot if you want. (I've never had to do that but you can). Once it flashes you can let the phone reboot or you can just pull the battery then force reboot into recovery by holding the volume-up, home and power buttons until you feel the phone vibrate. Release all buttons and wait for TWRP to boot. Once in TWRP, do all of the wipes same as before multiple times. Then for good measure go to TWRP homescreen and press "Reboot" then "Recovery" and this will reboot recovery and ensure that the rom zip will flash with no trouble. Reboot recovery then flash the UN5 rom and remember to wait for data to conect before proceeding with setup wizard. Success. If this doesn't work then give up and leave your phone stock until you figure out what's causing your problems. Good luck.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
ScreenShots....

[IMG="ss1"]http://i.imgur.com/gJmUwZx.png[/IMG][IMG="2"]http://i.imgur.com/Glq2sry.png[/IMG]

[IMG="3"]http://i.imgur.com/stcQ9YH.png[/IMG][IMG="4"]http://i.imgur.com/o7qQr6l.png[/IMG]

[IMG="5"]http://i.imgur.com/0LTINxQ.png[/IMG][IMG="6"]http://i.imgur.com/a9x36q4.png[/IMG]

[IMG="7"]http://i.imgur.com/ueHMzi9.png[/IMG][IMG="8"]http://i.imgur.com/hXq7UB9.png[/IMG]
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Manish_007:
Thanks for this rom sir. Just wanna know any bugs or not??
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] sagar.singh:
Thanks bro will give review after use

can u tell me how to fix emulated storage??
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
Bootloop in black variant with s004 firmware

Bro I flashed it in my black variant which had s004 firmware it boots but after that if we open camera then it will be showing initiating resources then it wont boot at all

So can u fix this???:crying:
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
well i don't have that issue. which camera app??

snap or default camera app?
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
In both camera app bro :crying:

Which firmware u have ? If u have black variant with s004 firmware ull face this problem

If u have s014 backup can u upload asap?
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
S012.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
Does not work in black variant(s004 firmware) :(
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
i don't know why u guys have that problem. I'm on s012 version.so flash that version and try.

btw anyone with white model face that issue?
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] sagar.singh:
Nope bro best ROM I ever tried only thing that I think it's not a issue but

Bro in file internal and external storage are displaced with different names

Best battery backup

Smoothest

No bugs

Best audio

Hoping u will also port blisspop latest
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
I tried bro several times same problem camera autofocus doesn't work its usual in black variants if roms of white variant flashed in black variant
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
[MENTION=5455751]sagar.singh[/MENTION] i was thinking of tesla os.....

[MENTION=6377505]riyaz7861[/MENTION] i have black model of same device. and to be honest i never faced that issue.soory for ur problem.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
Bro u have black variant with s012 firmware ?!

And u didn't face camera autofocus problem how??

We all who hav black variant face this problem!!

K can u upload ur twrp backup then ???

Coz im fed up with stock rom so im asking so much questions!
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
yes.I'm have black model build no XOLO_Play8x-1100_S012+29072014.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
Do others having black variant face any bugs or problems when this rom is flashed?
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] kapcha:
yes i have white variant but am running a black stock rom coz of headphone jack pblm in white ....but in blck camera cant connect error ....so should i try it as i have white variant.....

---------- Post added at 06:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:13 PM ----------

no bro still same problem even in white model i flashed it with s012 stock rom then tried it it starts and go in loop showing initializing resources...vibrate and again initializing resources nd vibrate process continues ...am rolling back on black stock rom again coz in blck rom headphone works atleast but i miss my camera very badly...
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
Ya bro same problem i faced in my black variant
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
Bro can u make a fix for camera autofocus problem??
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
no,because i don't have any autofocus problem.so how i can make fix???
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
:crying: then there is no way
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
in any cm 12.1 version u have camera auto focus issue was fixed??

if u want i will make fix including all camera libs,just flash that.

may be u get bootloop or ur issue will be solved.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] sagar.singh:
Hey bro pratikmore give this Solution for miui v7 problem

Just replace usr folder from miui ROM...if not solve then try to change etc folder also.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
Will check that.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
Not fixed in cm 12.1 or any other cm based roms.

Ya bro thanks make a fix ill flash and I'll report u :)

---------- Post added at 05:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:24 PM ----------

Bro i have a question what if I have stock firmware s004 and if i flash s012 then install cm12.1 of white variant(s014) will there a autofocus problem?
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
i hope not.because when u flash new rom it will overwrite current SETTINGS.that include cam libs also.

and whiech cm 12.1 has base on white model?
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
what pratik has recently uploaded with snap camera ? dono correct me if iam wrong :)
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] gunavignesh:
few glitches...

I actually own white device with s014 firmware, and used philz recovery for install. following issues are found while i try to use this ROM.

1) Keyboard not displayed at first boot, so enabled manually after enter into system from setting by enable physical keyboard slider

2) Unable to enter into backup & reset section in settings. Always settings get crashed after entering into it

3) Camera displaying wrong info that, back camera as 14.2mp & front as 8mp. (Not sure default or snap camera, but feels like default camera)

4) Unable to erase SD card content through settings. but able to erase phone memory. And also erase through PC. Also Name for Internal & SD card displays in some-other name

5) Boot animation of RR is not shown, in both the cases like reboot and fresh power up.

after faced these issues, i move back to 2016 version CM12.1. where i didnt face the above issues. but CPU-z displays totally wrong info like battery voltage, battery type, sensor info...

:(

Actually this is my first time by installing custom ROM in 8x 1100, so i donno may be i done something wrong too. but i tried b4 RR in yunique n S4-duos...

So kindly guide me, is the above things are issues or am i miss anything...

otherwise rom seems perfect and stable. Thanks for bringing this for our device...

:)
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] riyaz7861:
Bro u have s014 firmware backuped???
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
1.that's not issue.it's default in our device.

2. didn't use that.will check.but it isn't big issue.

3.that's correct.and that's not bug.all cm 12.1 have same.

4.yes.name of internal sd card and internal storage is different.i missed that to correct.

5.boot animation missed.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] gunavignesh:
Sorry bro, i didnt take backup before installing this ROM. But am sure that there is not much in S014. It actually some 19mb update which i received in a month after i purchased this mobile. But all i received is 2 useless bloatware games. i didnt see any fixes with tht version, so i feel s012 is default firmware for our devices(white) which is available in androidmtk...

:)

---------- Post added at 07:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:34 AM ----------

Hi bro thanks for ur reply, actually yesterday i tried once again RR in my mobile. This time i found the following issues.

1) FM not working, i mean its opening and tuning, but no sound output, even in speaker mode

2) compass not working. Also when i try to enable it through notification tray icon, it says initialization for some mins, and back to disable position again. in CPU-z too, its not displays any values under it.

3) While i try to openup polaris navigation app after enable location settings & wifi on, it get crashed and bring whole system into loop. Then i have only choice by remove battery and insert to On again.

And apart from this, you mention above that camera pixel in CM also same. But am sure that, in latest CM 12.1 it displays as 13 & 5 respectively. also you said its default in our device for enable keyboard at first boot, but cm12.1 latest not have that issue.

Hope you will look over it, and update in your next release...

:)
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
no next release.just help ur self.
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] gunavignesh:
sorry bro, am not good with these kind of things. and moreover i already gave my mobile back to family member with stock rom again in it. since i'm started to use coolpad note 3...

But at someday i try to explore this firmware things. At tht time, i surely try(hope so) to make betterment your RR rom with fixes...

:)
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] 1995cdk:
bro anyone send me any stable rom for xolo play 8x 1100
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] Manish_007:
download link not working
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] realsachin:
Link is not working
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] realsachin:
Please provide its link
[XOLO Play 8X-1000/1100 ROMs, Kernels, Recoveries, ] dip1991:
link deleted due to inactivity.

i dont have backup.

sorry guys.