yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[OnePlus X Android Development] afatpig:
?Hi,I had flashed the Remix ROM,can i flash this？
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
It doesn't happen often so I think I'll stick with U700

You just use Ubers default flags right? I could run through them sometime this week
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
i can't remember they changed but i started with kind of uber "default" ones taken taken from ak for one plus one back then ;)

that anyway doesn't matter as said same flags other toolchain = working! so what might be the culprit? but well yes as said i still think its a flag

as toolchains have default flags enabled especially different ones from major version to major version.

ok thx then i wish much fun with it :D but keep in mind it's not only about removing of flags it's also about adding them for disabling

features/optimzations and so on, i was going through all this multiple times for days and then u finally find out that it is caused by the toolchain itself

(or a part of it) and u r screwed. that's very frustrating + wasting of time (huge issue for me) but well if it works then its great and

the reason why i keep doing all that. :) ok let me know if u find something and good luck (u need it *g*) and btw. if u want to spare some time

start with stock flags! :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION]

Haven't been ablevto find the flag yet, but would you ever consider building the kernel with Tipsys ramdisk? Half of the ROMs out there use it, and I doubt any incompatibilities would exist.

Thanks for the great work! The notification switch issue isn't happening nearly as much as it does with U600... Maybe once every other day
[OnePlus X Android Development] xtino:
At last I discover battery drain is caused by gapps..I change it to the latest..good for now
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
yah really strange thing with the notification switch, randomness is really a bummer in addition, as said we will have to live with it for now.

nope i wont actually do builds with other ramdisks but as i happily could see u meanwhile started your own project to help spreading boeffla kernel to the mentioned roms

good luck and much fun with your new experience! ;)

fine which again confirms the not so big impact of a ("bug free") kernel when it comes to unusual high bat drains :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] xtino:
Why I occasionally get 1 core max, the other core wont wake up..it usually happened about 1 time each day..aftee 6-7 hour of use
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
how can we know that!? u tell us which governor and hotplug profile u use and how u "messure" that the cores r not going online, then we maybe can give u a hint, deal? :)

even though, as stated in op -> no support for the builds here. so before we continue i even can give u one good general advice if u have ANY issues with my builds, first try

another one (but be aware u600, u700 has knows notification switch issues) OR even better switch to boeffla official build and see if the problem is gone.

if it stays then we have an official bug which should be reported in the official boeffla kernel thread. otherwise we r running in circles in this experimental area here ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] xtino:
I use the zzmove governor, any hotplug do that after 6-7 hour..ok maybe I will try with official version..thx

---------- Post added at 11:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:40 AM ----------

Oh I turn on the cpu info on developer mode..so i know how many core is on
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
I had fo sooner or later :). I wonder how this'll work out if I adopt DragonTC and disable the incompatible flags with Uber... That may produce a working build... I don't know. More things to do in the days to come haha.

---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 PM ----------

Actually I think many ROMs have deprecated that feature. Not sure why but if I were you, I'd try CoolTool. Itay provide much more useful data
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
thx ok now we know more (somehow i suspected that u use that combination *gg*) interesting im not using my opx as a daily even not for hours so i didn't recognise such a behaving yet

but i will watch next time i boot the device. aand yes as [MENTION=5900207]RJDTWO[/MENTION] said don't trust only one tool use at least 2 to be sure ;) cool tool/micro cpu monitor (!)/console (most reliable as the fastest) and permon

are the one which i use since years. of course there are many other good ones around. with perfmon and zzmoove i often got some "unsharp results", so better use others

to "watch" zzmoove in particular. and ehm did i miss your used system or did u not mention it, hmm? :) might be also be a difference CM or OOS ;)

it's always a bit thrilling if u bring in new TC's, yes! we will see how it goes, i'm curious and will have a look at you thread...

have fun! ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta4-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] xtino:
Wow..just try new beta 4, really quick return to lowest freq..better test first
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta5-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] fourX79:
Hi,i updated from beta 4 to beta 5 on my Rom. Had a freeze on first reboot. After that all is great with beta 5, I had 30% more screen on time. Great kernel, good job!

Gesendet von meinem ONE E1003 mit Tapatalk
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] Not sure how referencing HZ would be a problem for the tristate, but eng.stk recently merged a few fixes for GCC 6. Here's the one I personally found interesting:

https://gitlab.com/engstk/onyx/commit/3ecbceec7c572c0f55236f63c2cade59382d2871
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
hey thx nice pick! worth a try ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] Tiongkia:
Anyone tried on Sultan cm13?
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] We have our fix! It works here with Uber 6.0.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
ehm yes i have a fix now but were did u get yours from ? :) i just was going to announce that the patch u send didn't fix the problem

on u600+u700 builds for me but it pointed me to the actual issue (random crap values in a var) and so i did an additional change

which finally fixed it. but well i will put that all together in next build so that we have both in. if i may drop a bit critism: this driver

isn't coded very well so the patch anyway makes total sense. ;)

ok then thx again [MENTION=5900207]RJDTWO[/MENTION] and stay tuned guys....
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
It could've been many things honestly :)

Maybe it was the adaptation to PAs gesture system... I don't know... But whatever it was, its working :)

Awesome that you found a concrete fix though!
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
Updated Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta5-CM13.0-OnePlusX

re-build/-uploaded!

Changelog:

- fixed issues with tristate switch (thx [MENTION=5900207]RJDTWO[/MENTION] for pointing!) and added a stability related change (credits to engstk) too all builds

- u494 image build with latest 20160606 toolchain version

- u531 image exchanged with new u541 one build with 20160606 toolchain version

- u600 image exchanged with new u611 one build with 20160606 toolchain version

NOTE:

the u700 image is still build with 20160421 toolchain version as we have a "bad toolchain snapshot -> no-boot situation" with the recent version

but image was rebuild to include the tristate switch fix. ;)

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] phoberus:
I'm on the u531 cm13 kernel at the moment, do you recommend to switch now to u600?
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
Hi, well I cannot really recommend any of the images made with new toolchains as I need long term testing. All I can say is u can use them now without a (known) glitch and the new ones all feel very well. But get your own impression by just using them.. ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] fourX79:
Hi,I changed from u531 to u700, I don't Notice any difference.

Gesendet von meinem ONE E1003 mit Tapatalk
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
is this bad or good? :) for me seems like good as the build is working *g*

but well seriuosly yes the differences r often really minimal if even noticeable

especially on the X i can't feel any between all the builds. but it's

not my daily so i might not have "the eye" for it yet ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] fourX79:
Hi, this is good. I use it as daily driver and it's perfect. Battery life is good.

Gesendet von meinem ONE E1003 mit Tapatalk
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Generally 5.3.1 should still be the best in terms of stability and 7.0 in terms of speed. I've yet to find an issue with Uber 7.0 since merging the tristate fixes, but to be on the safe side, 6.1.1 seems to be the best compromise. I can notice the difference but if you can't, best use Linaro 4.9.4 builds. That's as stable as it gets :)

Edit: oh and it looks like the distro I use is eventually switching to GCC 6 as the compiler for the host! They literally just switched to 5 last summer:

http://news.softpedia.com/news/open...elp-to-make-gcc-6-the-default-compiler-504402.

A bit off topic but at the end of the day somewhat relevant in a distant sense.....
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
link is dead ;) but ha! nice [MENTION=5900207]RJDTWO[/MENTION] yah a bit offtopic yes but actually also very ontopic at least for "us two" as im using it too *g* (but leap) its my system since version 6.3 (pre-"open") oh man i'm getting old *g*

anyway yes i only can underline your statements about the different toolchains and add for a rule of thumb: stock kernel also uses 4.x so code is "made for it" = most stable. 5.x was/is the new general used one = stable. 6.x is getting the general used one = still a bit shaky as for some sources still "new". and 7.x experimental as hell (already got my first punsh in the face with this version *g*) = no one knows what happens

this all easy spoken and excluding non-stock-optimizations (which makes things totally different by its own)
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta6-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] tet-bundy:
actually so here running suse :) greets from Nuremberg [emoji16]

Gesendet von meinem ONE E1003 mit Tapatalk
[OnePlus X Android Development] LolHacker17:
U dont tweak anything right?

---------- Post added at 06:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:06 AM ----------

What the different between u700?u611?what the best?
[OnePlus X Android Development] tet-bundy:
see a few posts above. 600 considered more stable compared to 700

Gesendet von meinem ONE E1003 mit Tapatalk
[OnePlus X Android Development] LolHacker17:
Wht version u use?
[OnePlus X Android Development] LolHacker17:
RR u mean?
[OnePlus X Android Development] psychem:
check the h2os thread
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- u494 image build with 20160606 toolchain version

- u531 image exchanged with new u541 one build with 20160606 toolchain version

- u600 image exchanged with new u611 one build with 20160606 toolchain version

- u700 image added build with 20160421 toolchain version

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.1-beta1-CM13.0-OnePlusX

Boeffla-kernel-4.2-beta1-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

NOTE: images are now in new anykernel format so please pay attention to following

quote of some important information from lord boeffla:

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.1-beta2-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.1-beta3-CM13.0-OnePlusX

Boeffla-kernel-4.2-beta2-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.1-beta4-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- u494,u541,u611 images build with recent 20160722 version.

- u700 still build with 20160421 version as no-boot situation with 20160722

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.1-beta5-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- u494,u541,u611 images build with recent 20160727 version.

- u700 still build with 20160421 version as no-boot situation with 20160727

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] saurabh40629:
Thanks for building it for us. Smoothness of uber keeps me hooked to this.
[OnePlus X Android Development] dchrono:
Would this kernel work on Orion os?
[OnePlus X Android Development] DJ_V!ploM@T!C:
Will I be able to flash it on Dirty Unicorns?
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
not made for such roms but just take a backup guys, try, see and if u r kind u come here again

and report back that it works or not. but as said like with official kernel there are versions for

CM13.0 and OOS that's it.
[OnePlus X Android Development] DJ_V!ploM@T!C:
I works like butter on DU <3
[OnePlus X Android Development] Lazy Rich:
Update plz :D
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

patience plz :D

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.1-CM13.0-OnePlusX

OOS version follows soon...

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- all Uber images build with recent 20160912 toolchain versions.

- for whatever reason linaro images doesn't boot anymore -> investigating.

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.1-CM13.0-OnePlusX (the missing Linaros)

Boeffla-kernel-4.2-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- all Uber images build with recent 20160912 toolchain versions.

- fixed linaro builds

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.2-beta1-CM13.0-OnePlusX

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta1-OOS3xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- all: Uber/Linaro images build with recent 20161012 toolchain versions (except u700 build with latest working one).

- OOS3 : no l5xx and no u7xx builds yet because of lack of working toolchains

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] are you using the arm-linux-androideabi variant for compilation with u6X builds? Picking your commits and fixing a fee broken inclusions leaves me with a broken kernel that panics half way through the boot process. Here it is if you'd like to look:

https://github.com/RJDTWO/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8974

I reverted everything back to your TC commits and had the same issue. Francos thermal driver was the only addition that had been made at that point but I tried reverting that too with no luck....

Thanks for the new builds though! I've been running them myself for the last few days and they are great!
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
yes i use androideabi toolchains for the new OOS3 source. all others are leading to your mentioned bootloop situation. i found that out the hard way as i tried all non-androideabi ones before finally using one androideabi, and i've got quite a few different eabi versions lying on my harddrive, so that took a while :)

EDIT: ehm and i forgot my branches indicate this now with the "ae" addendum to the toolchain version for example "u621ae", just for info. ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] Nachiket.Namjoshi:
I compiled my OOS3 source based kernel with Linaro toolchains (can be found in this directory), I was able to successfully compile after a few glitches that needed to be fixed apart from your fixes and it gave me a perfect bootable kernel...

I guess Uber is the culprit here.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
ehm nope i had the same problem with my old selfmade ever working linaro 4.9.4 eabi toolchain. and which one did u exactly use from the link (it points to all the variants)? a androideabi one i guess. would be very surprised if that isn't so. but well anyway the "stock" one is also a androideabi one so i anyway will keep that variants for the future. ;) but btw. thx for the link to the prebuilds i actually was looking for that since some time now. i'm kind of blind these days :eek:
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Thanks! Good to know. Appreciate your work with fixing up things so that we can use Uber. I switched from eabi and it is working great now
[OnePlus X Android Development] Nachiket.Namjoshi:
I used pretty much all "ae" toolchains, look!

nachiket@reactor:~/android/onyx/kernel/toolchains/Linaro$ ls
arm-linux-androideabi-4.8 arm-linux-androideabi-5.4-linaro
arm-linux-androideabi-4.9 arm-linux-androideabi-6.1-linaro

I leave my commits here

build: Add Numerous Optimizations also toolchain: additional build fix for gcc 6.x.x

EDIT: They are derived from your commits, I removed some of the build flags as there were build breaks and didnt care about fixing them xD however, As far as I remember, I only removed about 2 of them and put them in some other makefiles in subdirectories...
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
It's spotty on occasion if you update each time the TC updates like I do but in my experience, Uber is incredibly reliable and the benefits don't feel placebo on my end at least. I really like Linaro too though I guess it's really out of habit for me to use Uber.. Still can't get 7 working for the life of me. 6 is plenty stable though and 7 will probably introduce instabilities...

---------- Post added at 05:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:39 PM ----------

The only modification I ever made was switching to O3 and disabling graphite but that seems pointless now
[OnePlus X Android Development] Nachiket.Namjoshi:
well, uber7 fails for me too. I will try my hand on the fixing after a few days, but then again, its beta.. so I'm rethinking about doing so... :3 [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] 's fixes after some tuning reduced a lot of errors but a few still remain.. IDK why, probably looking up some release notes (if we find any) would be a great help..
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
you r welcome. happy to read that.

ok as suspected the androideabi ones. ;)

and yeah if u find the flags remove it to make things working also my method so far :)

agree about uber very realiable except 7.x dont touch it :)

guys just an suggestion out of experience: don't waste your time with gcc 7.x! things stopped working after 20160421 version of uber 7.0 toolchain on all devices i support and finding what the problem

is a pain in tha ass :) i'm just saying... if u have the time and find something i will be more than happy to hear about it. i unfortunately (or fortunately *g*) have no time for doing it. ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.2-beta2-CM13.0-OnePlusX

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta2-OOS3xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

enjoy

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.2-beta3-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- all images build with recent 20161031 toolchain versions

enjoy

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.2-beta4-CM13.0-OnePlusX

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta3-OOS3xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- all uber images build with recent 20161201 toolchain versions

enjoy

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
Hi Guys,

just want to let u know that i installed a permanent poll with which we can find out

which kernel builds we actually prefer. please visit OP and hit your choice.

thx for voting, cheers!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-6.0-beta1-CM14.1-OnePlusX

...uploaded!

Changelog:

- all uber images build with recent 20161216 toolchain versions

enjoy

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] mdsaif92:
Does this include the tethering fix?
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
My vote goes to Uber 6.2.1. Why? It's been the most stable and the best compromise for performance. Here is something you might want to check out though...

Dorimanx maintains his TC optimised for the SD800 in his kernel sources. He also makes the claim that it is *optimised* for LG devices though I highly doubt it. I believe he uses Linaro binutils. Its on version 6.2.0 at the moment and was recently updated.

I started using it for my kernel and it's been the best TC that I have ever used.

If you would like, I can upload his prebuilt to my GitHub though I can't garuanteee a timeframe. If you'd like to pull it yourself, you can find it here:

https://github.com/dorimanx/DORIMANX_LG_STOCK_LP_KERNEL/tree/master/android-toolchain

Having a closer look, it looks like he might be done with the LG G2 now which is really unfortunate. Never the less, do give his TC a look. It has been great for me over the last few days.

Good to see you have kept up your work over the months. It's really awesome and I appreciate it.
[Honor 7 General] B1sakher:
Hello

i know that we've all been waiting for the marshmallow update.

i noticed that in Honor official website they've put a 1.5 Gb file named :

Huawei Honor 7 Firmware(PLK-L01, C432B320, Europe, Android6.0, EMUI4.0)

You can download it from this link.

http://www.hihonor.com/fr/support/software-list/
[Honor 7 General] krisu253:
This is full soft or the upgrade package?

Tapnięte z mojego Honora 7 przy użyciu Tapatalka ?
[Honor 7 General] B1sakher:
full firmware i think
[Honor 7 General] magnea:
I got that on ota yesterday.

Works fine
[Honor 7 General] onlinejobwork:
can you confirm is it final non beta version? can I download this file to upgrade from B140? on UK version phone?
[Honor 7 General] lubomir.michale:
How to install this firmware?

Odoslané z PLK-L01 pomocou Tapatalku
[Honor 7 General] voyager_s:
Got the ota few minutes ago. So far so good. Looks to be the final version
[Honor 7 General] miodzicho:
I can tell what i did :

1. unrooted first

2. using Honor 7 multitool I installed 320 Recovery

3. copied from B170&180ToB320Intermediarypacket.rar update.app to internal memory (dload directory), went to settings - update, phone rebooted and updated.

4. copied dload/update.app to sd card, settings - update, rebooted and updated just fine.
[Honor 7 General] chouzo:
hello,

so i downloaded the full B320 version, i have Honor 7 EU with B180, how can i update from 180 to 320 full??? as it isn't an update without loosing data or loosing my phone?? lol. Im unrooted and locked bootloader.

thanks
[Honor 7 General] ElyanoSantos:
Try paste File UPDATE APP on dload folder and shutdown you're phone and press key to go on recovery .

Try Friend ☺
[Honor 7 General] miodzicho:
Yes you can. This is what I did.
[Honor 7 General] Freebob94:
Hi,

Someone know if this method works?

Use the Huawei Update Extractor to extract the (BOOT.img), (SYSTEM.img), (RECOVERY.img), (CACHE.img), (CUST.img), and (USERDATA.img) from the UPDATE.app

fastboot flash boot BOOT.img

fastboot flash system SYSTEM.img

fastboot flash recovery RECOVERY.img

fastboot flash cache CACHE.img

fastboot flash cust CUST.img

Thanks
[Honor 7 General] B1sakher:
guys i'm a noobie i don't really know how to install it.

i just posted the link since it would be important, hopefuly someone will explain to us how to install it without loosing data.
[Honor 7 General] btb55:
There is a comprehensive guide with instructions within the zip file. Download it from the link you posted, extract it and read the 'Software Upgrade Guideline' PDF. One thing to note is that if upgrading from B160 and earlier simply use the update.app, if B170 or later there an intermediary update to do first. Its all in the guide.