yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
yes u can install this kernel (just use latest version) and for flashing u first need to unlock your bootloader (attention this includes a full wipe!)

and then u need a custom recovery like "twrp" for ur phone.

details: https://forums.oneplus.com/threads/...om-recovery-root-take-efs-backup-more.401713/

take your time and read precisely. ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] psychem:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] bro very good work. can you fork the boeffla kernel for nougat and port it for oreo? that will be GREAT!
[OnePlus X Android Development] seema21:
I'm confused

Dear sir [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION]

I'm using lineage os 14.1 latest version.

I have to flash your kernel but I'm confused

Bedside in the download section there is lots of file in the name of boefla version 6.1 but which one I hated to download pls tell me

Thanks in advance :good:
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
wow this might be my longest delayed reply ever (i guess i overlooked *g*) anyway the answer is "probably i might be able to port it yes but i won't do it, sry" reason: no time (this is not a trivial jop if u want to do it right) and no use of the little X anymore (actually i never used it as daily)

u can use any image u want and flash over (they are 100% compatible with boeffla app) and try. even over official kernel (if u had used it previously) and vice versa. as easy as that just pick one and flash, but finally u should take the one u like not the one u hate ( lil joke :) ) decision help: i use to like the u7xx and u8xx images, maybe u like them too? just try.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.0-beta4-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ

PS: renderserver has closed! - links removed.
[OnePlus X Android Development] psychem:
beta 5 should cross 70k on antutu. getting 1020/2940 on geekbench 3 waiting for your optimisations
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
no need to wait any longer :)

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.0-beta5-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] psychem:
surprisingly bet 5 has 65k on original version and 68k on your version. geekbench score 982/3014.. unexpected results.
[OnePlus X Android Development] saurabh40629:
In boeffla config app, there are already some presets for Lord boeffla's kernel . Are there any particular profiles in this kernel which you found to be good and can recommend ? I have caused havoc in past fiddling too much with kernels, hence want some suggestions to get max from the kernel.
[OnePlus X Android Development] rockuppl:
uber or linaro?
[OnePlus X Android Development] psychem:
uber
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Any specific governer? I was using ondemand and couldn't even touch stock geekbench scores
[OnePlus X Android Development] saurabh40629:
I have tested on interactive as well as ZZmoov - battery yank profle. 60k usually . But i would suggest not to chase after this too much. If you feel phone is snappy and smooth and giving good battery life, it should be fine.

I am currently testing zzmoov, with light undervolting. Standing with 72% battery over 1.5 hrs of SOT. Used camera,chrome, fb and instagram . Going strong till now.
[OnePlus X Android Development] psychem:
im also using ondemand. mayb something else is different.
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Flashed beta 5 and switched to zzmoove

Geekbench:

992 Single Core score

3186 multi core score

Great to see it was on my end. Any chance of F2FS?
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
just to state it here again: guys do not put too much interest into these benchmark results. they actually are nonsense. if u want to have highest rates then u should do it the right way by overclock/overvolt(if available) and using performance governor ( if available) which runs on highest freq all the time. then u might get higher rates. but for example if u overclock then u always and on EVERY device run into thermal breaks within seconds which again leads to "false results". so it depends how fast these breaks are kicking in.

for me benchmarking is only a method to test stability as u are stressing the system for some time.

f2fs will not happen as lord boeffla doesn't want to implement troubles for u. :) another nonsense which is only there for giving u higher rates. the other side is compatibitly issues and possibly data corruption/loss.

my conclusion: no f2fs and enjoy your fluid and fast system without benchmarking it to dead ;)

but as stated in Op u can of course go on an post ur results here and compare. no problem with that but just keep the above lines in mind.
[OnePlus X Android Development] psychem:
Crossed 70k 71126 antutu score ???
[OnePlus X Android Development] Voltor46:
Which version of Linaro or Uber should give in theory the best performance in terms of snappiness and smoothness?

Benchmarks don't mean too much for me.

I just want to learn, I do not know much about it.

Enviado desde mi ONE E1003 mediante Tapatalk
[OnePlus X Android Development] chineel:
Hi, @ ZaneZam

If you can, please do compile for CM-13 also.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
first there has to be a official cm13 boeffla kernel available then sure I will try to do my thing. [emoji6]
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.0-beta6-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.0-beta7-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded

Changelog:

- Uber images build with recent 20160303 versions

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Could a tool chain create issues with IO schedulers? I can't have fiops for internal. It defaults to ROW
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
don't know didn't change the scheduler during my tests and i can't test atm. but u can by yourself try to flash over official verison and see if it changes

this behaving. beside of that: u set the scheduler with boeffla config i guess? if not then it can be the kernel settings overwrite restriction

which can be disabled (not recommended) in boeffla config app settings.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.0-beta8-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Looks like Lord Boeffla fixed it when I reported it. From now on, I'll flash his kernel and debug to make sure it's related to his source when I manage to find bugs. Hood to know a tool chain wouldn't be responsible for this. Thanks for the builds! The Uber one is fantastic
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Would by chance be willing to add Sabermod builds to the OP? I've been building then lately and I think users would appreciate it if I shared them. The source wasn't modified or anything. I just pointed the build script to point to a different toolchain
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
technically of course i could do that but i don't know if i want to put more work load on me.

i'm facing stressful times these days and i've a lot more builds to maintain (meanwhile 6 devices with multiple os's)

and i like to sync them when it comes to available variants which means one build more for every device/os

so maybe i will see, when i have time i can at least do a test with sabermod (again we already had that but

Uber kicked a... since it's existence :) )
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.0-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] variant0:
Ok so im kinda noob and confused here... So this is basicly the exactly same boeflla Kernel, but compiled with a different tool ? Whats the advantage or problems that could arise from flashing this one from the original ? and yes.. i read all the info on this topic..

If anyone could make me understand i would appreciate!

Thanks!
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
yes same base but different toolchains and different compile flags. advantage might be more fluid/faster system higher + benchmark rate (pointless) and maybe even better battery.

but all that in not a "huge range", so its just a bit of tuning on top of a already great and stable kernel. problems might be instabilties because of unstable experimental toolchains (the u600 ones) and flags

but not that im aware of any big problems actually. so just try and see how it works on your system. u can flash over official and unofficial builds as u like, boeffla config settings are preserved its basically

the same kernel.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta1-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded

Changelog:

- Uber images build with recent 20160401 version except u600 (still 20160303) because of unresolvable error with this toolchain snapshot (maybe next time again ;) )

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
Which uber version is the best in overall performance?

[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION], which do you recommend personally?
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
performance wise I would say the u600 one but I recommend the u531 it feels a tiny bit smoother for me on all devices I'm using here.
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
I"ll try the u531 then. Thanks, bro. :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
Cm13 alpha builds are already out, bro! Now I'm waiting on you. :D
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-alpha6-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
U600 working like a charm. Thanks for the great work as usual!
[OnePlus X Android Development] Abhinai99:
Hey guys! The kernel is awesome but I have noticed a bug in 20160413 build u600 I.e the tri state key is not responding correctly! It is not going to alarms only when pushed completely towards the ear piece..

Edit : it goes after pushing the key twice to the top most position
[OnePlus X Android Development] ksujit:
[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION]

Thanks for your build working flawlessly on rr 5.6.7
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
Tri state working fine in u531... Besides, I dont really think that kernel can affect tri state key...
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
thx guys...

u actually r both right! i can confirm that glitch! obviously the u600 build doesn't work right here at this particular function, u531 however does! strange but we have to except the uber 6.0.0 is really a experimental toolchain and i guess i can't do anything against that atm... besides of recommending to use the u531 one which [MENTION=6144370]jonrodz[/MENTION] and meanwhile me too confirm the working switching. ;) i anyways recommend the u531 one because it's made with a stable gcc version and at least for me gives a tiny bit more "fluidness". so now we have another reason to use u531 :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
U531 does feel slightly smoother and that issue no longer exists. Thanks again. Never felt so smooth before
[OnePlus X Android Development] phoberus:
Is there a recommended Rom for the U531 cm13 kernel? Or to which does he fits best?

By the way, I just got the Oneplus X :good: Hello guys :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Ashwins CM13

AOKP works too, but don't expect support
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
Just want to share with you guys the awesome experience I'm having with this kernel. Using u531.

Very but very smooth and awesome battery life.
[OnePlus X Android Development] herakles18:
Share your profile, dude! :cyclops:
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
Here you go, bud. :)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/6lpzlnkf5ki8q9a/supreme-v1.bcprofile?dl=0

Thanks to [MENTION=5900207]RJDTWO[/MENTION], used his voltages because I don't know nothing about that. :D

And thanks to [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] for the kernel and [MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION] for this awesome uber toolchain version.
[OnePlus X Android Development] Abhinai99:
RR is not booting after flashing the kernel(u531) :( does this kernel only support ashwin's cm13?

---------- Post added at 09:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:35 AM ----------

Which version are you using u531 or u600?
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
Yes, it doesn't boot if you flash the kernel right after flashing the rom. What you need to do is:

·Flash rom

·Set it up

·After you're done setting up your rom, flash kernel.

It works fine like that, I'm using u531 on latest RR rom.
[OnePlus X Android Development] Abhinai99:
Yup i followed your steps still no luck with u531 but u600 booted up :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
You did something wrong then. u531 worked for other people and worked for me...
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
This isn't revommrnfrf however... If you ever make a change to the system partition then it is recommended cache be wiped as well.

For whatever reason, cache won't build with Boeffla on ROMs using modified versions of the CM build tree. I wouldn't expect it to until it becomes beta.

I have found working ROMs however:

AOKP (what I use), Temaseks, CM (obviously)
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
yes might be that everything which is too "far away" (mostly ramdisk-wise) from ashwin's build might not work as lord boeffla used the ramdisk of this rom in his sources.

so we only can try what works and what not (especially if other roms r more uptodate this might break things in addition) but some nice guys already posted their

experience/knowledge (thx btw as i can provide this info!) ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] nihilista:
I can confirm, works on latest RR. I had original boeffla cm-kernel installed before, then installed u531, got no problems with that.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ksujit:
first i was using u600 and it was working great

then i switched to u531 and its also working great
[OnePlus X Android Development] phoberus:
Someone tested the compatibility to roms like temaseks cm13, Orion OS (AOSPB based) or AICP?
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Temaseks, CM, and AOKP all work with no caveats. Besides that, no. AICP and RR work if you build cache first, but that's not recommended
[OnePlus X Android Development] nihilista:
What did you mean with "build cache first" on RR? I never did anything else than installing kernel and rebooting, the only thing i had to do was flashing supersu again, dont know why its gone away after flashing kernel....
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-alpha7-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
On MM, the boot image must be patched.

You must've dirty flashed it. If I clear the cache it doesn't boot

---------- Post added at 10:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 PM ----------

Good work as usual! U600 still has that one issue and U531 is buttery smooth

Maybe I'll try L531 too. Not sure how Linaro compares yet though

---------- Post added at 10:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 PM ----------

[MENTION=3279788]ZaneZam[/MENTION]
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
thx for the info! yeah i expected that it doesn't change with the u600 build i didn't change anything to fix it *g* - would have to try all older versions i preserved here to see if that fixes it

but i have no time for extra things atm. :( and about the new experimental stuff from lord boeffla: i decided to not make builds for the test version as this would "unsharpen"

the poll result for andi if u guys r voting with one of my builds running ;). so u really should compare the original with the original experimental one, don't u? :)

but well i might reconsider if u guys are good and exclude yourself from the official test and poll.
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
I already submitted my result. It helps a ton.

You're probably right about the poll results though however awesome it would be
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
300 HZ Test

Hi Guys,

by checking the main download link and going into HZtest folder u find a u531 buid with the 300 HZ tick rate change included :)

and just for the record:

there is a build available for recent OOS and CM13.0 kernels.

this is the only build i make as it is the one i use so plz no requests i have no time to do all of them - the HZ change will be included in every build when it is official included by [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]

by using this build u agree to exclude yourself from the offical test + using the poll [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] installed for his test!! yes please compare official with official builds, thank u! ;)

nevertheless enjoy! :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Thanks!!
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta1-CM13.0-OnePlusX

Boeffla-kernel-4.1-beta2-OOS2xx-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] saurabh40629:
Smoothness of u531 just blows my mind. Boeffla was already awesome and you made it even better. :highfive:

I am running CM btw, no chance of running oos, that's pure mess littered with bugs.
[OnePlus X Android Development] phoberus:
Hey guys, are there already roms based on the official cm13 build, that works with the 5.0 beta1 kernel? Or can I use it only with the official build at the moment?
[OnePlus X Android Development] nihilista:
For me it works good with latest RR, but only if not wiping caches before. If installing directly after rom flash you will get into bootloop.
[OnePlus X Android Development] raulx222:
Link to info/discussions about ZZMoove governor?:D
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
oh yes thx for the heads up, as often copy paste error :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta2-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] xtino:
No problem so far, good battery too
[OnePlus X Android Development] jonrodz:
Is it possible to get beta1 again?

I just want to test something and compare it with beta2...

For example, something that is happening in beta2 that didn't have in beta1, is that when I'm dowloading in chrome and I leave the app, the download stops and just dissapears, but if I stay in the app, the download continues until it finishes.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
yes u can find obsolete versions here : https://www.mediafire.com/folder/qc58oedp2ageq/oneplusx
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
New Builds!

Hi Guys,

builds of...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta3-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...uploaded

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] feligoni:
You ulpoded them on OOS folder hehe, just letting you and everyone know.

Great work!! U531 is really smooth
[OnePlus X Android Development] electrofryed:
Although I can care less that my phone can make a cup of coffee with 10 billion gigaflops, I love the sound mod.

Thank you for making my phone loud enough to hear at the job site.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
did i? oh man that happens when i'm stressed out :) thx for letting me (us) know! will be fixed soon!

u better thank [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] for this. ;) i'm just the man which puts the "icing" on top of his kernel :)

EDIT: Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta3-CM13.0-OnePlusX images in the right folder now!
[OnePlus X Android Development] Jude Aranha:
Noob-iest question yet incoming,

Whats the difference between u600, u531 & u494, similarly l531 & l494 ? are these version numbers ? Newer builds ? higher number means more power or something ? complete noob when it comes to kernels here. Sorry :(

PS - Gonna use over Resurrection Remix 5.6.8
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
no problem mate we are here to answer your questions :)

yes the addendums i made are the version of the toolchain i used for the kernel

rest is "boeffla standard" which means the same original boeffla kernel version

so in short:

toolchain = set of tools to build the kernel image

versions eg.:

u600 = Uber 6.0.0 toolchain

u531 = Uber 5.3.1 toolchain

u494 = Uber 4.9.4 toolchain

l531 = Linaro 5.3.1 toolchain

l494 = Linaro 4.9.4 toolchain

Uber Toolchains

Linaro Toolchains

by using uncle google u might even find more info about all that ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] karan5chaos:
its a great kernel . i have been using it for a while now. i just have one question .

You might be familiar with hell's core kernel and it had this option to amplify headphones driver along with the normal volume boost in its app.

is it possible to implement that feature in your kernel ? :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Itvlooks like Uber 6.1 is the new stable branch
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
thank u but actually not entirely the right place to ask for features here - head over to the original thread and ask there again - but be patient [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] is on vacation so do not expect a fast answer ;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
Experimental Time!

Hi Guys,

new build for...

Boeffla-kernel-5.0-beta3-CM13.0-OnePlusX

...added

Changelog:

- as the pre-build toolchain popped up a couple of days: first Uber 7.0.0 build added! -> ATTENTION VERY EXPERIMENTAL! (in terms of long term stability) it works quite well here with full

optimization flags (+some fixes) but i don't know how it behaves long term (which i normally test with new toolchains -> no time for that -> hence let u guys find it out :) ) so again be warned

and expect everything but actually i have not that bad feeling about it ;)

enjoy!

ZZ
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
deleted
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Man, I really am blind :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
U700 is working fantasticly. I think its more smooth than U531! Great job. Nothings broken believe it or not;)
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
thx but nah it's not completely glitch free.. i forgot to mention that there is the same strange bug with the notification switch like in u600 builds. but well as already stated

i can't do anything about it. if u dont use the switch often to never (like me) then builds u600+u700 r good (yes actually u700 feels very good!) otherwise builds >=u/l531 r the ones

to use as there is no bug in these (really strange but well we r experimenting here *g*).
[OnePlus X Android Development] brausebirne:
How about u700 for OOS?
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
No time atm, I only did it because I'm running CM13 so a quick build/test was possible. if I have time I will of course add the OSS variant in addition. ?

Gesendet von meinem GT-N5110 mit Tapatalk
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
The switch works on Sultans but not any other ROM... Weird

---------- Post added at 09:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:33 PM ----------

Never mind.. Just happens less often...

---------- Post added at 09:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:20 PM ----------

https://github.com/sultanxda/androi...mmit/22cf18ca1c80b9589d3c60549df8c9fc4ff041b7

Have a look at the commit... I believe gestures are linked to keyhandler so this could be the fix.
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
thx but this commit has nothing to do with the notifiation switch, its for gestures detection when screen is off

anyway there is "no way" to fix that in the source as the code is actually working. its really the toolchain or any used flag (a flag which is even working with other toolchains!)

the only thing i could do is (if i had time and were feeling to - both not the case atm *g*) to trial & error which flag provokes the glitch. very time consuming process.

we have to live with that for now, for me not that big deal as "u531" is working great! :)
[OnePlus X Android Development] phoberus:
Do you mean with notification switch the Tristate Key on the left side?
[OnePlus X Android Development] CertifiedBlyndGuy:
Yes. It occasionally doesn't work
[OnePlus X Android Development] ZaneZam:
yes but only with u600+u700 builds, just for the record ;)