yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] redpoint73:
As you are still on Lollipop, any SuperSU version 2.44 or up should be find. I think 2.46 is the latest version still labelled as STABLE.

If you were updated to Marshmallow, you would need 2.62 or higher. Those are labelled as BETA, but folks have been using them with no issues, in my understanding.

On boot screen, in fastboot mode (with fastboot highlighted in red)?

You were able to do fastboot getvar all, so I assume "yes" to the that question. So in that case, the RUU can be very finicky. Try re-installing HTC Sync, different USB port, different cable.

You might even need to try another PC. Win7 and USB 2.0 (USB 3.0 is known to cause issues) are your best bet to get the RUU to work.
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dwerp1234:
Thanks a lot, I changed the port and it runs fine. The ROM is being updated right now. It says it will take 10 mins, but it has been 40 minutes and still 0/6. I'm using win10 btw. I have no win7 around.
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ckpv5:
You have connection issue .. I'm on Win 10 64-bit and no problem when running RUU.

You need to use USB2.0

Latest HTC USB driver installed - Install HTC Sync Manager - http://www.htc.com/us/support/software/htc-sync-manager.aspx

it will install the needed drivers then uninstall the HTC Sync Manager but leave the drivers.

And I always see many people with USB connection and unable to run RUU ... that's why we have nandroid backup to restore to stock.

Check - http://xdaforums.com/htc-one-m8/help/tutorial-how-to-stock-stock-twrp-t3086860
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TNTN 997 SU:
These are my getvar all results . Guidance please

(bootloader) version: 0.5

(bootloader) version-bootloader: 3.19.0.0000

(bootloader) version-baseband: 1.29.214500021.12G

(bootloader) version-cpld: None

(bootloader) version-microp: None

(bootloader) version-main:

(bootloader) version-misc: PVT SHIP S-ON

(bootloader) serialno: SH4BTWM00156

(bootloader) imei: 357336066036366

(bootloader) imei2: Not Support

(bootloader) meid: 00000000000000

(bootloader) product: m8_ul

(bootloader) platform: hTCBmsm8974

(bootloader) modelid: 0P6B10000

(bootloader) cidnum: HTC__203

(bootloader) battery-status: good

(bootloader) battery-voltage: 0mV

(bootloader) partition-layout: Generic

(bootloader) security: on

(bootloader) build-mode: SHIP

(bootloader) boot-mode: FASTBOOT

(bootloader) commitno-bootloader: 76df2b54

(bootloader) hbootpreupdate: 11

(bootloader) gencheckpt: 0
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahmed.ismael:
remove your serialno and imei

Then what do you need ?
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TNTN 997 SU:
I tried to root my device and it didn't work properly and now it is stuck in the boot logo "that white screen with green hhtc on it". I was runniing on marshmellow and twrp version 3.0.2. I factory reset it but still didn't work. I wanna go back to stock. tried different ways but still didn't work
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahmed.ismael:
Here all you need is in this post follow the instruction and you will be back to stock be aware that your internal storage will be wiped

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=64926626&postcount=6

after that if you want to root your device flash the latest twrp then flash the latest supersu.zip ( 2.78 SR1 )
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TNTN 997 SU:
Thanks alot
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] redpoint73:
To be clear, factory reset doesn't revert anything back to stock, aside from (all it does is) wiping user data.
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] edwinariko:
failed to flash anything to my htc one m8

how can i get rid of this error

target reported max download size of 1826418688 bytes
error: cannot load 'Unlock_code.bin': No error
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] redpoint73:
The error message "cannot load" means the file isn't in the right place. You need to put the unlock bin file in the same folder which contains fastboot.exe (and where you are executing the command from).
[Moto E Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] theankush:
Hi,

I have got an issue, after my previous repair, I have installed custom ROM. Which was working fine till now.

Yesterday my cellphone got battery dead. Now whenever I am booting it, it stucks at Moto Logo.

Tried cache wipe, dalvik cache wipe, fixed permissions, factory reset.

All in vain, none worked. Moreover, when trying to fastboot the recovery.img for custom ROM, it is not detecting USB, I believe that is due to USB debugging disabled. Need help here.
[Moto E Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Cheez2553:
Can you get to recovery?If not you need to flash a new recovery from fastboot

If your PC Can't find the device,drivers are missing,fastboot WILL ALWAYS be detected,even if ROM had debugging off.

Inviato dal mio Moto E utilizzando Tapatalk
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] dlimano:
I was wondering if you can save webpages to html files and then convert them to a word doc file?

Or from an html file to a pdf file.

I need to know before purchasing an x7500.

Thanks in advance!
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] davicito13:
Hi!

I want let you know that I tried.

-I save the web page as an HTML

-I open the .html page with pWORD and save it as a .doc

-When I open again this file .doc you can see the page as an html code, ok? in my computer too.

I don't know if there some soft who can "convert" from html to doc. that works in our "baby".

I hope you understand, my english is creepy
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] dlimano:
Are you saying that when you open the doc file even in your computer, you see them only in the form of html code?
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] davicito13:
yes you will see the entire content of page, I mean the source code.

I understand that you want see the .doc as web site...
[Advantage X7500, MDA Ameo ROM Development] dlimano:
Cool, can you save images? and what format will they be saved as? png, jpg, bmp? im so close to buying an x7501, so any info on this will be really helpful.
[Pixel C General] AstroDigital:
I been a member here for many years and the board has two main purposes customization (rooting, kernels ... etc) and support.

There are few things people should keep in mind.

Few people create a thread and say this device is great.

People that have issues either imaginary (and yes some faults people report in my opinion are imaginary) or legit, may think every device is defective.

This advise please take to all threads not just Pixel C, read the threads but please keep in mind any device you buy from anybody will have strengths and weaknesses, do not let a few negative threads turn you off from purchasing.
[Pixel C General] beardymcgee:
Well said, I have 2 pixels from day one no issues and they are really the best tablet I have ever owned hands down

(I've had the following: HP touchpad, nexus 7, nexus 10, nexus 9, Sony z4 tablet, nothing has come close)

We made should make a single topic thread for all issues and everyone just post there instead....
[Pixel C General] bill3508:
I've had zero problems also. Felt bad for those who are having difficulties.
[Pixel C General] hevey:
I am loving this device. I was running with an iPad Air before this and the experice with some applications not being optimized is very overhyped here.
[Pixel C General] _TiCuS_:
No problems here! Loving it.
[Pixel C General] oRAirwolf:
I think this is the nicest tablet I have ever owned and I have had quite a few. It's build quality is unmatched outside of Apple. I personally don't give two hoots and a holler about multi window or productivity nonsense. I read or play games on my tablet when I am taking a crap and watch media when I am on an airplane. It works great for this. If you want something for productivity, buy a Surface or a laptop. The complaint about the lack of tablet optimized software is moot to me because mediocre tablet optimization on Android is still better than hating my life with Apple's garbage OS, development ecosystem, active suppression of end user firmware modification, and corporate philosophy. I have not had the problems some people have reported with Wifi and the touchscreen, but it is my understanding that both issues have been fixed with the February security update.
[Pixel C General] Wildo6882:
This is definitely good news. But bad news for my bank account. I've been waiting for awhile just to see some more in depth analysis and see if the kinks get worked out. This tablet is EXACTLY what I've been waiting for.
[Pixel C General] undertaker2k14:
What a bunch of bull! One of the most reputable sites on the net, anandtech has advised everyone, including Google fans to stay clear of the Pixel C. I've noticed some shills taking over the wifi thread on the Google forums too, claiming it wasn't bad or did not exist at all.

If you want to waste $500+ please go ahead and buy the the Pixel Crap.
[Pixel C General] BlueGoldAce:
And here I thought andantech praised the devices hardware, and was hesitant to recommend ANY android tablet until the software takes better advantage of the hardware.

I am here because I am considering selling my ipad air 2 for this device. I love android, and moving from my 6p, or even my surfacebook, makes me see the flaws in iOS. Yes it has great apps, but as a whole it lacks the robust features of the other two platforms.
[Pixel C General] tshoulihane:
Its very strange, some people claim to have issues (and get very agitated about them), others have lots of praise. No problems from here, except the questionable developer-friendly nature of the device today (although I'm not necessarily unhappy that the OS is more CR-OS than Android).
[Pixel C General] parakleet:
After 3 Samsungs and wanting to keep a 10" plus tablet as i am a full grown man I switched to Pixel C.

no complaints at all.

great tablet.
[Pixel C General] oRAirwolf:
Anandtech's problems with wifi and the touchscreen are resolved with the latest update.
[Pixel C General] charesa39:
I thought the February OTA only addressed the touchscreen issue. At least that's what "Orrin" (Google rep) said on the product forum when I checked it a couple days ago. He said they are still working on the WiFi issue.
[Pixel C General] oRAirwolf:
My bad then, sorry.
[Pixel C General] charesa39:
It's all good. :)

I always tend to agree with the sentiments in the OPs post, in that rarely do you see people making threads just to praise a device. But as soon as the tiniest issue arises, people never fail to make a thread and complain. I've seen these forums light up with issues since I've started pre-ordering Nexus phones back with the Nexus 5. Nexus 6 and 6P were pretty much the same exact thing, with people claiming they were flawed. However, I never had any issues with my devices. I think what makes this device (and it's apparent issues) different in my eyes comes down to two things:

1) The fact that Google has acknowledged and confirmed at least the Touchscreen (fixed in Feb OTA) and the WiFi issues. I've never really heard Google own up to any issues with any of it's past devices, especially when they were first launched. Sure they would come out with hardware revisions (ie. the back on the Nexus 4), but they would kind of do it on the down low.

2) The price. Seeing as I pre-ordered a 128GB 6P at full price just a few months ago, and the fact I just dropped about $800 on a 12TB NAS, $600 (before tax) is a good chunk of change. If I'm paying that much, I want to make sure I am getting a device that works as I would expect it to (ie. no random reboots, dependable WiFi connections, easily rootable, etc.), especially since it's not really a necessity and more of an entertainment device.

These two main factors are kind of what has scared me off from pulling the trigger. But man do I love this thing whenever I see pics and videos of it, while I stare at my aging Nexus 10. I think as soon as I find out whether the WiFi issue is hardware or software related, I might be picking one up. Anybody seeing them potentially discounting these soon by like $50 like they did with the 6P?
[Pixel C General] atg284:
That update did not fix the wifi problem judging from the official nexus forum: https://productforums.google.com/fo...ce=footer#!msg/nexus/CM9tv3pjTfQ/QY0xGoTMAgAJ

I donno it doesn't seem like they are getting anywhere with the wifi issue at the official nexus forum. the devs have acknowledged it but there has not been word from them for a while. Meanwhile more and more people are reporting the same issue with wifi at a distance. That issue is a little harder to test if you are just casually using it close to your router. But many people are replicating exactly what I saw in the two units I had before returning it for my money back.

On the flip side it looks like the last update did fix the touchscreen issue.

Again, how these two giant issues made it out of testing is beyond me because they seem to affect most.

Edit: The title of this post is a little misleading and feels like it is just sweeping the issues under the rug.
[Pixel C General] Wildo6882:
Man, that's really too bad. I was all over this thing last September when they announced it. But it never came out. Then once it did it immediately had issues. I've been impatiently waiting for these issues to get addressed and it sounds like one has been. But this wifi thing is still a deal breaker for me. I really want this thing and I really want it to work! This is exactly what I'm looking for in a tablet. But wifi is kinda important...
[Pixel C General] Flipflopp:
Thank you OP. I have a Motorola Xoom 1st gen tablet that I'm looking to replace and I have been looking at the Pixel C. I will most likely be placing my order for one.
[Pixel C General] Theo1:
I replaced a xoom 1st gen. with a Pixel C. You won't regret it. Great machine IMHO
[Pixel C General] wclark57:
It is good to keep things in perspective and its easy to loose that perspective when watching the threads.

So if you are thinking of buying and if you try to use this tablet at some distance from your WiFi router, it seems you're likely to have issues. It seems this issue is something you could mitigate, but it is a big irritation to pay so much and get problems like this. If, on the other hand you are always fairly near your router, you are likely to love this tablet.

Whenever a company enters into a market like this with a new product there are some issues and whenever they refactor something in a rush to market, you can bet on issues. This IMHO is Google's big mistake. Still, they have acknowledged the WiFi problem as an issue, so we can expect them to address it one way or the other. And as irritating as it is, not having continual commentary from someone at Google on the issue seems like the norm to me--though it isn't necessarily a good communication strategy. Lets just hope it can be resolved by a patch, because frankly I don't expect a buy-back.

So yes, there are issues and some of them are with people's perspective:

1. The tablet doesn't match the productivity hype in the way most hoped it would, even though they knew at the time it was announced that it didn't have multi-window. If you want productivity then the Surface is likely for you. There is hope that a future update will make it better, but multi-window alone is not enough to address the productivity issue IMHO.

2. The keyboard is lacking in that it doesn't have a touch-pad, and it uses Bluetooth, which is more flaky than a direct connection. If this is important then you could get a Surface or look at the Jide UltraTablet. Some don't see a need for a keyboard and seem to get butthurt that an optional keyboard is ever offered, but we all have our issues.

3. There aren't enough apps that fit the size of a tablet.

I'm not trying to be flip here, or at least not entirely. For some, 1 and 3 are real issues, and 2 is a huge disappointment bordering on the unforgivable. But if you want just want a great Android tablet, do these issues matter all that much? I don't think so.

I have toyed with the productivity angle and am seriously considering a surface instead of one of these. IMHO that is part of Google's big mistake because marketing this device as if it was for productivity leads me to think of productivity and because it cannot possibly compete on that field with the Surface, I naturally think "Why shouldn't I just get a Surface". Making a Linux user think of getting a Windows machine to use as a Windows machine is not good for your future Google.

Still, this is a great tablet with issues (the Surface has some issues as well). If that is all you're looking for, here it is. And in the end I expect I'll get one because I already have a laptop and carrying it isn't that much of a pain. In fact I may just get a Jide and wait to see what happens here.
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
Carbon KK 4.4.4 ROM For Nokia X/XL

#include
/*
* Your warranty is now void.
*
* I am not responsible for bricked devices, dead SD cards,
* thermonuclear war, or you getting fired because the alarm app failed. Please
* do some research if you have any concerns about features included in this ROM
* before flashing it! YOU are choosing to make these modifications, and if
* you point the finger at me for messing up your device, I will laugh at you.
*/

Hello guys!

In this thread I'll present an new ROM for Nokia X/XL (normandy). This is an unofficial build, so this not supported by CarbonDev team.

What is Carbon?

ROM Features:

What Works:

Known Issues & Problems:

Downloads:

- For Nokia XL: Download Here

For Nokia X: Download Here + Patch

OLD Versions:

Carbon KK 4.4.4 ROM For Nokia X/XL V1.6

For Nokia XL: Download Here

For Nokia X: Download Here (Updated Patch-Fix Rotation Sensor) Thanks [MENTION=7179626]geo.tn[/MENTION] For Sensors Fix :D

- Hotspot Fix Here :D

- Update v1.5: For Fix Move2SD Here / Mirror

V1.4: For Nokia XL: Download Here /Mirror

For Nokia X: Download XL ROM And This Patch

Installation Instructions:

Sources:

Thanks to:

ALLAH the Almighty

CabonDev Team

CyanogenMod Team

[MENTION=6376551]Anonim47[/MENTION] For Lenovo ROM

[MENTION=6887229]Ahmed Hady[/MENTION] for Vendor files and Helping me

[MENTION=4624985]weritos[/MENTION] For Nokia XL Cm11 And Camera Fix

[MENTION=5664626]wielski[/MENTION] For Nokia X Camera Fix

And me for Porting the ROM :D

XDA:DevDB Information

[ROM][NOKIA X/XL][PORT][UNOFFICIAL] Carbon KK ROM, ROM for the Nokia X

Contributors

YSH ALSAGER, Ahmed Hady, weritos, wielski

ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat

ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x

ROM Firmware Required: Any custom Recovery

Based On: Carbon

Version Information

Status: Stable

Current Stable Version: 1.6

Stable Release Date: 2016-02-04

Beta Release Date: 2016-02-01

Created 2016-02-04

Last Updated 2016-02-10

XDA:DevDB Information

[ROM][NOKIA X/XL][PORT][UNOFFICIAL] Carbon KK ROM, ROM for the Nokia X

Contributors

YSH ALSAGER, Ahmed Hady, weritos, wielski

ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat

ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x

ROM Firmware Required: Any custom Recovery

Based On: Carbon

Version Information

Status: Stable

Current Stable Version: 1.6

Stable Release Date: 2016-02-04

Beta Release Date: 2016-02-01

Created 2016-02-04

Last Updated 2016-03-1

XDA:DevDB Information

[ROM][NOKIA X/XL][PORT][UNOFFICIAL] Carbon KK ROM, ROM for the Nokia X

Contributors

YSH ALSAGER, Ahmed Hady, weritos, wielski

ROM OS Version: 4.4.x KitKat

ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x

ROM Firmware Required: Any Custom Recovery

Based On: Carbon

Version Information

Status: Stable

Current Stable Version: 2.0

Stable Release Date: 2016-02-04

Beta Release Date: 2016-02-01

Created 2016-02-04

Last Updated 2016-03-13
[Nokia X] geo.tn:
nice !

is it smooth for everyday use ? what about games ? does it have problems running games like many other 4.4.4 roms ?
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
For be honest i didn't tried games, but rom is very stable and smooth
[Nokia X] geo.tn:
ok i'm downloading this rom to try it but one last question ram usage is good ?
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
Yes :D
[Nokia X] akshaygalaxystarmod:
Good To Hear It Ported For Nokia Xl First Downloading....
[Nokia X] geo.tn:
i installed the rom and used it for over an hour now, everything is working great , alot of features to personalize the phone, battery backup is good, games running without lag, and ram usage is good atleast 100mb are free ... .

nice work !
[Nokia X] DucksDodgers:
Has anyone installed this rom ?

and takes the games?

and the battery lasts well ?
[Nokia X] geo.tn:
read the above reply

---------- Post added at 04:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:40 PM ----------

Update: Wifi hotspot and Rotation not working
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
on X?
[Nokia X] M7md pro:
Games bro?? Espicially agar.io pleas
[Nokia X] geo.tn:
Yes
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
OK i'll try to fix it thanks for report
[Nokia X] iebie:
nice rom bro ,,,waiting bugs free for X
[Nokia X] taher nokia x:
great work يوسف :D :o

i will wait for fix for nokia x :p
[Nokia X] Fild5x:
I am liking it

Please note that I have a weird Nokia XL. Working very well on this phone. It is actually the most stable 4.4.4 on my phone. The only three issues are:

1. Camera not working on this phone. All patches for camera are currently not working on my phone anyway. For whatever reason. I am thinking to reinstall stock ROM and then flash this.

2. Radio not there at all which I have realised is common for most cynogenmod custom rom.

3. I am finding it difficult to select 3G in the prefered network type settings. It is fixed on 2G.

:):o:D
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
Flash the rom only after doing Wipe, use twrp recovery to get everything right
[Nokia X] sr1r1:
I have tried changing to ART, phone reboots but doesn't change .

I have verified data/property/persist.sys.dalvik.vm.lib in text editor and still says libdvm.so means Dalvik.

Not sure about Carbon Rom. I am using CM11 and above behavior is on CM11 rom
[Nokia X] amitrahi04:
Camera

Any one tried this ROM on XL and is camera working?
[Nokia X] Eveready1998:
[Nokia X] After patch 1.7 themes are not installed, and already installed themes in firmware version 1.6 get fail <<In the app "android.process.media" an error occurred>>. And the problem is really in the 1.7 patch because in the firmware version 1.6, everything works correctly.
[Nokia X] zurik:
On my Nokia X had error "Theme Not Installed"
[Nokia X] Eveready1998:
Yes, and this error also appears. I rolled back (that is all erased from the phone and re-installed) to version 1.6, everything is working fine except wifi hotspot of course.
[Nokia X] hooooossamq:
Great rom.but when iam trying to switching on the 2nd sim its say com.android.phone closed then the network start switch on and of by it self till i desactive the 2nd sim.how i can fix that please???
[Nokia X] ashwani755:
earphones are not working

Earphones are not working in this rom
[Nokia X] DaRkPrInCeAmIt:
Link

Bro where is link for Nokia X rom? The link is takin me to 20MB patch file,where is rom file?
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
Rom file for X is XL Rom
[Nokia X] helix0203:
Link for Carbon KK 1.7 nokia XL.....pleasee...
[Nokia X] Haokip Eimi:
How do we install 1.7..???

My OTA is not working..
[Nokia X] Eveready1998:
See post №161.
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
Uploading....

Carbon KK Version 2.0 :D

Hotspot Fixed - Better Battery life.
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
Nokia X Carbon Patch V 2.0

(Fix For Hotspot)
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
Open Settings - Sim Cards - Configure Sim Cards then Active your sims.

For using only 3G mode (Do with one sim only): Open the" dialer ", dial * # * # 4636 # * # * then change it.
[Nokia X] BRoy_98:
Thanks [MENTION=6084385]YSH ALSAGER[/MENTION] for the beautiful rom! This is the most stable kitkat rom for our device I think. :)
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
You are Welcome bro :D

Try New PAC ROM it's the better than This !
[Nokia X] BRoy_98:
Oh really!! :laugh: I will definitely try this one today! Just waiting for 5.1 or 6.0 to work on our device.. I am sure you will fix it also! Best of luck bro. :fingers-crossed:
[Nokia X] yshalsager:
Carbon ROM Has been updated !

- New Base (DNS S4503)

- More Free RAM

- More Battery Life

- Hotspot Fixed For XL - For X not sure
[Nokia X] charantej47:
Iam a x user..by flashing that v2.0 flash can i get working hotspot?