yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[XDA Assist] @sabehla:
Its my first post in xda.. any error please tell me thanks

I Have a Phone ZTE V5S N198ST and I can not find anything about it. only in Russian and Chinese

zte v5s n198st : 5.0 inch 1280x720 p panel IPS

snapdragon 410 64 bits * quad core 1 .2 ghz - 4x ARM Cortex- A53

4G lte - gpu adreno 306 - 2GB RAM ddr3 - 16 GB internal memory

camera 1 : 13 MP camera 2 : 5 mp f/f 2.2 - 2400 battery / 4.4 KIT KAT / SUPERSU ROOT

It is a very good terminal with a very bad rom , it is not being utilized at all its power... no available roms :crying:

this phone with android 5.0 would be nice

MY QUESTION :

1)

This telófono has 16 GB of internal memory

EXTERNAL MEMORY WITH 16GB SD

However , it has 1.8 GB for applications such as partitioned this?

2)

I can't find roms and I recoverys , i feel afraid to try some Russian or Chinese " rom " and unable to restore unbrick

any person have this phone ? i need help thanks
[XDA Assist] Vatsal:
Hello,

This forum is for newbies finding their way around XDA-Developers. It isnt for requesting roms.

Since your device doesn't have any device specific forum, You may try asking with all relevant info here Ask any Q Noobfriendly

-Vatsal
[Galaxy A3, A5, A7, A8, A9 Q&A, Help & Troubleshoot] pmaneeshp:
Please help...

I lost my stock music player.

Anybody please upload it.

Model is SM-A500G LOLLIPOP 5.0.2
[Nexus 6P Accessories] kozad:
USB Type-C is great, until you realize that you probably want more than one charger, then you realize that you'll be spending $25 and up. Or so I thought.

I don't like this Google USB Type-C charger which has a non-removable cable. I just really hate the idea of having to toss the power brick once the cable has a short in it.

I searched eBay for a Lumia 950/950 XL charger, a Nokia N1 charger, and the OEM 6P charger, hoping to save a few bucks, but I had no hits. People are clinging to their USB Type-C chargers evidently.

So, recalling that the 5X is also Type-C, I did a search for an OEM 5X charger and I stumbled onto this eBay listing. :laugh::good:

For $17.99, how could I not grab one? It's the only one that didn't have me envisioning my apartment and cat going up in flames. So, I had no way to tell if it was indeed real, because I've never seen a 5X in person. When I opened the package, the cable just felt so cheap, the sheathing is thin and kinda satin-like. The best way I could think to verify if it's legit was Youtube unboxing vids, so I watched this video on Youtube and the dude holds up the cable and charger to the camera, like really close, and it matches what I have exactly! Yes, down to the little holes in the plastic on the USB connectors.

I have no doubt that it's real. It also does rapid charging (5V with 3 AMP output + "Charging Rapidly" is displayed on the phone)

I just thought I'd share this little gem with you guys. =) Oh, I ordered on the 4th and it arrived today, on the 11th, and had tracking too. Just thought I'd toss that out there!
[Nexus 6P Accessories] tysj:
If I remember right, cables that aren't spec'ed properly will still display "Charging Rapidly". Have you checked using Ampere?
[Nexus 6P Accessories] kozad:
My PC is not equipped with a USB Type-C port to test with that app, but here's this: The OnePlus cable always caused my phone to display "Charging Rapidly" on the lock screen, but never provided a time until the charge would be complete. This 5X charger however displays "Charging rapidly (12 minutes until full)" once the phone has time to calculate it. Well, 12, 36, etc. :good:
[Nexus 6P Accessories] kozad:
I will try that app real quick.

EDIT: 1420mA max on my 6P stock charger and 1400mA max on the 5X charger. Given that my battery is 92% full, I think it's fair to say it's legit.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] Pilz:
I had a Nexus 5X and that charger/packaging look identical to the one that's included in the box. Now, this doesn't mean it's legitimate, but it's a good sign.

---------- Post added at 07:23 ---------- Previous post was at 07:22 ----------

Ampere isn't even remotely accurate
[Nexus 6P Accessories] kozad:
Here's a screenshot. Using the 5X charger and cable.

​
[Nexus 6P Accessories] u2mir:
You need to run ampere when the battery is less than 10% to really see what the charger can do. As the battery charges, the current is reduced. Therefore this 1.4A may still be ok. Try it at 10% and report back to see how close to 3000ma you get.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] nhutpham:
I was under the impression that Ampere results were skewed by the amount of current being used by the phone while the charging was taking place.

This is a good idea though, sourcing the chargers for other phones as USB Type-C becomes more prevalent. Personally, I think I can get by with 2.4A chargers/micro-usb adapters and use the OEM charger at home if I need a quick charge before I go out for an evening.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] Pilz:
It won't charge over 1.5A using an proper C adapter or A-C cable. A 2.4A charger would be pointless unless its just something you have laying around.

I also mentioned earlier that Ampere isn't accurate but there are no C-C multimeter's that I've seen so far
[Nexus 6P Accessories] kozad:
Well, the phone is giving an ETA to full charge, something it never did with the OnePlus cables. I think that, coupled with that packaging and likeness, says that these are legit. It's only $18, so if anyone would like to take testing any further, go for it. I'm convinced it's legit - Ampere gives the same readings with the stock charger, and even if the app isn't the greatest metric, that's a good sign. =)
[Nexus 6P Accessories] Pilz:
The one plus cables are dangerous to use and do not meet the USB specification. There's no way to really know if the charger is an OEM item unless you have a 5X charger to compare it to.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] radeon962:
You bought a $500+ phone and you are worried about "saving" $8 by buying an unknown charger from eBay?

I just bought the cable from Google as if something were to happen with my phone as a result of the Google cable, it's going to be a lot easier to get a fix for the cable and/or the phone with Google than trying to tell Google I used a cable I thought was good that I bought from eBay.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] kozad:
As I said in the first post, I don't want a charger with a fixed cable - soon as the cable takes a crap, the whole thing is just garbage. I have never been a fan on fixed cable solutions. And what does it matter that I bought a $649 phone? No one should want to spend $40 on a charger with a removable cable from Google. If I wanted to drop that much money to charge my pricy device, I would have bought one of those new Macbooks.

The point of the post was just to give other people a heads up that I found a good deal on an OEM charger, not to argue with people about it or be called a tightwad. I can afford a $40 charger, but no, I won't buy one.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] jordy787:
How is the genuine 5x charger on the 6p? Does it rapid charge like the original 6p charger? thanks
[Nexus 6P Accessories] Pilz:
Yes I used to have a 5X along with my 6P and the OEM LG one does rapid change the 6P.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] fatasian:
SONEic - USB Type-C (USB-C) Rapid Wall Charger & USB Type-C to Type-C Cable, 15 Watt/3.0 Amp (3A) for Nexus 5X/6P, Lumia 950/XL, LG G5 and All Other USB Type-C Devices - Black (Charger+Cable Included) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B017BVLLC6/ref=cm_sw_r_other_awd_yTOZwbPJ7WSKR
[Nexus 6P Accessories] LiquidSolstice:
I wouldn't touch that eBay crap with a 10 foot pole. My phone is $600. I am not about to put it or any other piece of electronics in my house in danger because I wanted to skimp on chargers.

There are many charging blocks and Type C cables that are Benson verified and really cheap on Amazon. I'm not calling you a tightwad (although even then, spending ~$20 on Amazon would net you a proper charger that would for sure be Benson approved and non-captive, which is what you want). I think you're a fool to be blindly recommending Type C chargers without actually knowing if they are legitimate or not. Fake devices are notorious on eBay for looking visually identical to their real counterparts. Seriously? Comparing to what you saw in a YouTube video?

You may be fine taking the risk. But don't sit there getting all self-righteous because people are rightly skeptical of some no name eBay listing, especially when your only proof is an Ampere screenshot that tells us nothing and your own interpretation of the "Charging rapidly" text on your lockscreen.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] borisb:
There is nothing wrong with looking for a deal.

That's why your phone was $600 while other might have got it for 550 with no tax and free shipping.

:D
[Nexus 6P Accessories] farfromovin:
Yeah, I bought one of these and the charger and cable looks just like OE from Google except it is labeled "SONEic" on top of the charger. The cable looks, feels, and in conjuntion with the charger functions exactly as the Google charger that came in the box. Worth it to pick up a couple of these if your obsessed with chargers like I am.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] Jrmiller:
gonna have to snag one or two:good:
[Nexus 6P Accessories] LiquidSolstice:
There's a huge difference between "a deal" and "a crappy aftermarket part that can damage something I own".
[Nexus 6P Accessories] borisb:
Nobody said that you should get a crappy after market part. Get a deal on the good stuff
[Nexus 6P Accessories] NCguy:
USB-C isn't supposed to be brain science. In twelve months people will be buying usbc chargers and cords from vending machines. I'll dare say you can buy defective micro usb cords today that can fry your phone but all of this is very rare. A little caution is prudent but I wouldn't freak out over it. That charger is now down to $9.99 and if it puts out I'd be interested for my N6. Especially since someone has already tried one and lived to tell about it. Not to mention nexus protect in that really rare case.

Edit: $9.99 is apparently for cable only. Looks like charger is out of stock. Looks like seller has 99% favorable on 2000+ ratings
[Nexus 6P Accessories] borisb:
There are Benson approved cables for 2.5$ on amazon.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] farfromovin:
I bought this and it DIED in 3 weeks. Either I got the 1 in 10000 that die or its just a cheap Chinese clone. Refund processed with Amazon!
[Nexus 6P Accessories] fatasian:
Sux, mines been a champ.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] yahoowizard:
Link?
[Nexus 6P Accessories] borisb:
It was last week.

Sorry. The deal is no longer there

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B017X99ML8?tag=ravpower00-20
[Nexus 6P Accessories] 8en:
got the 5X charger and cable from ebay too. been using it for a few week. great deal and it works fine. getting 3mA while quick charging.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] jay2o01:
i got mine pretty quickly, as stated in these prior posts. it looks to be legit LG, quick charges. happy to have an extra phone charger for the office at this price.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] wigglesrewind:
I jumped on one too. will see how it performs but my thinking is most of the issues have been related to legacy cables(from A to C) ruining devices. from what ive heard.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] GroovyGeek:
Nice that they will sell you the charger separately from the cable. I don't buy anything G shorter than 6ft cables nowadays. 3 ft chains are for the Apple lemmings.
[Nexus 6P Accessories] MSITHero:
Easy answer to that is you first calculate your base power draw at idle with Ampree then get your charge rate and minus the base power draw form it to get your close to accurate (no app will be 100%).
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
Reserved
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] the.gangster:
Sounds great. If this works reliable without side effects and if [MENTION=6159291]Lysergic Acid[/MENTION] merged your patch later (after it has proven that), this would make a dream come true for many here.

Thank you so much!!!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
hi [MENTION=6159291]Lysergic Acid[/MENTION],

i entered a change on gerrit:

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/127877/1

tests on the i777 are still pending.

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=64778749&postcount=149
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Acid0057:
[MENTION=4141005]Lanchon[/MENTION] you are awesome. What a cool idea to fix a Samsung problem of putting the recovery and kernel together.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Klaerchen:
[MENTION=4141005]Lanchon[/MENTION] is there a possibility of some compatibility check? I mean, what happens, if the isolated recovery somehow does not match the kernel, e.g. I (hypothetically) start with CM12.1 plus isolated recovery and want to switch to CM13 with corresponding feature, but the kernels have to differ in some way so that the isolated recovery still in the partition fails. Can the isolated recovery be invalidated somehow?

Could this be done with Odin?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] effgee:
Have found a hilarious bug, don't worry, don't need support but if someone else can confirm, that would be fun.

Xposed 79, if Gravitybox is enabled (its settings don't matter.), and the screen is off, receiving a Skype message, reboots the phone. Completely reproducible here. LOL
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
simple, if that happens then the person goes into android and clobbers the recovery partition from there. or writes a different recovery from there. or overwrites the kernel (manually or flashify style). or goes to download mode and uses odin or heimdall to flash a kernel or recovery or just to clobber. basically you are describing a situation of flashing the wrong kernel: the standard cure is using download mode.

that said, i thought of disabling the alternate check by pressing VOL DOWN during boot. but...

a) this affects several devices and, though IsoRec is compatible with all, the button setup could be different; that means investigating and testing, testing, testing with owners of obscure devices.

b) i don't know how to read button state directly using the kernel so i would have to research that.

c) most importantly, i don't have time to do a) nor b)! the patch took a few minutes; then building the kernels, packing the recoveries, testing, entering the change on gerrit, and writing all this down took a couple of hours already, hours that btw i shouldn't have spent on this AT ALL.

this is the best i could make it in the time i didn't have. IMHO the missing VOL DOWN functionality does not justify stopping people from having this. let's see what the CM gerrit people think. one thing is for sure: i don't have the time to make it better.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] franticfreddy:
[MENTION=4141005]Lanchon[/MENTION]

Hi,

many thanks and much respect for your great work!

Im gonna test the IsoRec now, seems its working good so far,

hopefully the trim will not destroy my phone.. :)

(Im still would be feel much more safe when kernel dont have trim functionality!)

Best regards
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] dimoochka:
Badass. This is a really elegant solution - no need to reflash on every boot. Great job!

PS. It's awesome that you're also ripped. Are you a luchador in your day job?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
lol no, i'm just heavily invested in not looking the nerd i am
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
UPDATE: new devices, kernels, recoveries..

added:

CM 11 IsoRec-compatible kernels

CM (CWM-based) 6.0.5.1 IsoRec-compatible recoveries

for all supported devices:

d710

i777

i9100

n1000

this time i built the recoveries myself. these recoveries are the run-of-the-mill, old-style CM recoveries we all love and miss that used to come bundled with CM in the Kitkat days. they are compatible with CM 11 and CM 12.1 kernels, so you can use them with your Lollipop ROMs.

finally, i also added IsoRec disablers for the newly supported devices.

please note:

the (previously) published TWRP-i9100 recovery has a bug: adb sideload does not work.

EDIT: adb sideload works correctly on the newest i9100 TWRP (by arnab).
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] cyril279:
Wow, slick.

It seems I have a patch to add to the slim builds.

Happy flashing

-Cyril
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] chrisXL:
[MENTION=4141005]Lanchon[/MENTION]

I read the OP, but it's not fully clear to me how it works. Where should I put the preferred recovery after having flashed the isorec compatible kernel?

Anyway thank you for the great job you did.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] arnab:
[MENTION=4141005]Lanchon[/MENTION]

Latest twrp ramdisk as requested.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx_upRk6Kfw9MUU4UGdBel9xbDQ/view?usp=sharing
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
you flash it whenever you want, independently of the kernel. it has to be an IsoRec-compatible recovery; it CANNOT be a "legacy" (non-IsoRec; lol) monolithic kernel+recovery. look for some recoveries in the OP of this thread.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
UPDATE: new TWRP for the i9100 contributed by [MENTION=414800]arnab[/MENTION].

thank you so much arnab!!!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
thanks, that would be awesome! :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ringen00:
Using

'kernel-Lanchon-TRIM-FreezeFix-TWRP-20160111-cm-12.1-i9100.zip'

right now.

In which order shall I flash:

1. kernel-Lanchon-TRIM-IsoRec-20160112-cm-11-i9100.zip

2. recovery-Lanchon-IsoRec-TWRP-2.8.7.0-20160113-i9100-(by-arnab).zip

3. Lanchon-IsoRec-Disabler-i9100.zip

- Which zip's will i have to put into CyanDelta to flash along with upcoming nightlies?

- Will I be able to go back to older TWRP etc. anytime?

- What is the benefit in one sentence?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] fireburner-de:
Not Isorec kernel, but Isorec recovery of choice. And yes I did this for changing CWM to TWRP some days ago.

1. Diabler

2. new Isorec recovery
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] the.gangster:
You can switch immediately between isorec recovery versions. Disabler only needed to get back to kernel-embedded recovery
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] fireburner-de:
So Isorec flashing wipes recovery partition?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
nested recovery: what is that?

the IsoRec kernel with the recovery of choice: what is that?

to nest a new recovery: and what is that???
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
correct

EDIT: i incorrectly read "isorec disabler"
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] the.gangster:
I assume you (fireburner-de) mean if flashing an isorec recovery?

In that case an image is written to that partition, whereas lanchon described the isorec Disabler.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] fireburner-de:
Right, so it just overwrites partition header with new image. And disabler only overwrites that header.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] the.gangster:
No.

Recovery overwrites partition with new content.

Disabler just modifies the header.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] fireburner-de:
I actually meant it that way ;)

Now everything is clear.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] DevilZeta:
Hallo. I have cm-12.1-20151116-SNAPSHOT-YOG7DAO1JN-i9100.zip (nightly are not more available) installed.

I want install CM 13, but i need IsoRec.

I tried to install IsoRec via flash and/or via ADB and Installation was successful. But when i reboot into recovery, it boot always the old stock recovery from CM 12.1

What can i do? (sry for my eng)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] fireburner-de:
IsoRec compatibility was merged into Cm12.1 with Nightly from 19th January. That snapshot is older, therefore doesn't support IsoRec.

Get last Cm12.1 Nightly here.

But if you want to change to Cm13 anyway: If you have installed that IsoRec recovery (like you said), it will remain there even when you change to CM13 and will then boot, as CM13 is compatible.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] DevilZeta:
Ty, you help me alot. Tomorrow i'll try installation :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Lanchon:
yes sorry, i misread

true
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] kudos1uk:
Did not mean to offend, I used the word nested as it was the word you used in the OP when talking about the ramdrive and thought it was a fair term to describe the hidden isolated recovery as a whole., I could have said isolated, cocooned , made sense to me because it's hidden away in it's own recovery partition.

By "flash the IsoRec kernel with the recovery of choice" I meant flash the IsoRec recovery (trim in my case) and recovery of your choice (in my case arnab recovery)

Again, sorry if I offended sometimes what I'm thinking does not come across on the page as I intended even though it makes total sense to me :)

I only asked a quick question so sorry I did not go into enough detail, I just really wanted to know the correct method to replace a IsoRec recovery, disable first or just flash over, That's been answered now, thank you.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] chikkoh_xda:
Freshman Problem

I just clean-installed CM13 on my phone (GT-i9100) after I found out about this.

Is still there a way for me to install Isorec with my CM13?

and lastly (A very noob question) is this the file I should flash?

"recovery-Lanchon-IsoRec-TWRP-2.8.7.0-20160113-i9100-(by-arnab).zip"

.

Sorry if this annoys some people but I'm just new at this stuff... :confused:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] franticfreddy:
Yes you now have to flash the isorec recovery zip in cm stock

stock recovery by adb sideload.

Or search for how to install twrp on the phone with terminal

and dd command.

Its already answered all in this and/or CM13 nightly threads..

You better did READ BEFORE FLASHING ANYTHING, instead

of just quick install latest CM13 and feel king with newest version..

Best regards.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] DevilZeta:
Error 70, alway error 70...

i repartitioned my i9100 with the 9GB pit file, and there is a lot of space, but when i try install gapps (Pico), it gives me always that damn error 70.

Where i can find SINGLE Play Store.apk and PlayService.apk files?? (Arm-6.0-Pico)

I want try to install them manually

Ty
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Acid0057:
Are you sure the 9gb pit file gave you at least 1 GB of system partition space? That's where google apps is trying to install.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] DevilZeta:
Internal Storage A: Total space 8.86GB. Available 8.51GB

Internal Storage B: Total space 4.51GB. Available 4.24GB

External SD: Total Space 14.83GB. Available: 8.38GB
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Acid0057:
What program are you using to get those space sizes and names? Just want to make sure.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] KickerTom:
Internal Storage A = /data

Internal Storage B = /emmc (internal SD card)

External SD = /sdcard0 (external SD)

Gapps need 1GB /system.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] DevilZeta:
I've read it on cyano. Settings-storage (for partition i used Odin).

where i can find system space?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Acid0057:
You can't find it in settings storage in Cyanogenmod. If you have access to the play store get DiskInfo by kruder it will show the system partition size.

What recovery are you using? If you're using twrp there is any easier way to partition now.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] DevilZeta:
I use TWRP IsoRec. Now i'm on recovery, and i can see that my system partition is 503MB -.-

what should I do? Guide me =D
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Acid0057:
Awesome follow the directions in this thread to repartition in twrp. It's way eaiser

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3311747
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] DevilZeta:
a question: "the sys1GB-data6GB (recommended): requires less than 7GB of used space in the internal sdcard."

My internal storage is 4,51GB. I must change it?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Acid0057:
Is that 4.15 GB of space that is used? If so then you're okay and ready to go.