yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tagtag123:
Jokes apart, the actual performance I get.

Xiaomi charger, rated at 2.0amp.

Nexus 5 running cata 6 and elementalx 6.05

The back of the phone does get slightly warm.

My Nexus 5 is 1yr 7mnths old.

I get about 3.5-4hr SOT over 24hrs of usage on single charge.

I notice that the speed depends a lot on the USB cable used.

I feel that I may get better battery performance after I get a new one, since over all this while I have used the phone very rigorously.

Screenshots:

Update:

I feel that even with 1530ma sustained charge rate, the battery would take 1.33 hrs.

((100-11)/100)*2300=2047

2047/1530=1.3379hrs
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FirstEver:
I will try with Quick Charge 3.0 tomorrow :)
[Moto X Q&A] Smash2Bash:
I wanna update my bootloader but I made a special Kingdom hearts 3 one in Photoshop and now I can't find the flashable zip or the photo itself. Any help would be appreciated.
[P3600 Accessories] illuzn:
Just bought a pair of Bluetrek ST1 Bluetooth Stereo Headphones and paired them up with my Trinity running the Australian WM6 ROM and it works a treat.

Audio quality is good for anything up to about 3 metres and degrades from there. The bass is a little lacking but I'm not sure yet whether this is a bluetooth issue or a headphone issue.

In other great news the remote control functions work completely with both HTC Audio Manager and WMP10 as do the call functions. I am yet to test voice commander compatibility.

All in all a highly recommended buy for a decent but cheap pair (AU$120) of bluetooth stereo headphones. I will report back on battery life and other issues if they crop up.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vinodrathod:
hi sir . can you help me solving write secure settings permission . i rooted my nexus 5 marshmallow . then i installed android id changer . but it’s showing ” this app is showing the write secure settings permission , however i was unable to acquire it . please convert this app into a system app ” . i converted android id changer as system app . but it is still asking like that . please help me solving this . tell me about terminal emulator. [IMG="screen shot of my descriptiion"]https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7hpJomqEvOfUEZMUmhqcC05YVk/view?usp=sharing[/IMG]
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
Hey everyone! To further help old/new users of these forums understand why and how their phones can perform better or worse than some, post your AVS groups which you can find in the Info section (avs summary sub section) of the Synapse app. Here s mine...
[Galaxy Note5 General] edwardob:
here's mine.... not sure what it all means
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
Thanks so much for posting! Well it means some people (with higher AVS groups) can possibly overclock/undervolt better than others. For example i can apply a -75mv undervolt to all the frequencies and achieve perfect stability. Also i can overclock to the full 2.4ghz and it will reflect in everything from geekbench to antutu scores and all this while maintaining the same stock coolness of the phone and battery performance.

I m curious to see if there s anybody here with an AVS group of 10 or above and see how well they can overclock/undervolt and generally speaking perform as far as scores and battery life goes.

For example this is how far i could push with perfect stability this phone while undervolted @ -75mv - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=63589738

Also the battery performance i got with 2.4ghz a57 cores and 852mhz gpu clock - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=63750002

And with 1.3ghz a57 speed/420mhz gpu speed - http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=63851201
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
Mine is 12 12 12 12 13 12
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
OMG OMG! I WANT YOUR PHONE! :)) will you exchange it for mine?

Anyway, joke aside..can you try and see how far you can undervolt/overclock and maybe some benchmarks (antutu and geekbench should be fine) and then a battery life test ?

Thanks in advance man and congrats for an awesome device!
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
However, it doesn't make any difference except the lower temperature. The power drain of this N920I is similar to another Note5 Which is N9200 with 7 7 7 7 8 7 avs profile. And the score of N920I which can reach 67xxx-68xxx is just a little bit higher than the one of N9200 Which is within 65xxx-67xxx

---------- Post added at 07:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:25 AM ----------

I don't think it can undervolt too much. I use arter97 kernel and just undervolt 37.5mv. Haven't tried other volt
[Galaxy Note5 General] ElQuixote:
Where do you find "Info" in Synapse? The only choices I have are: A57 Cluster, A53 Cluster, GPU, and Busses. I'm on Arter kernel...
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
First root ur device, then use an app call Root Explorer to check out /sys/kernel/debug/avs summary.

---------- Post added at 06:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:25 PM ----------

First root ur device, then use an app call Root Explorer to check out /sys/kernel/debug/avs summary.
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
I dunno man...i got.these.scores with a57 cores pumped at 2.4ghz both min and max... The battery score.is innacurate as i was already using the phone for an hour before starting the test..so it should have read like 10hrs and 41mins...
[Galaxy Note5 General] bala_gamer:
Avs 8 here?
[Galaxy Note5 General] Willyman:
My asv_summary reads

big:10, LITTLE:10, INT:10, MIF:8, G3D:10, ISP:10

I've been having pretty decent success with overclocking (1.5 and 2.4 GHz) and significant undervolting (-50 mV). I could undervolt less, but I was getting some issues (freezes, rebooting) so I'm happy with where it's at now.
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
stock clock & fixed max freq
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
Fixed max freq @ 2.1 or what value exactly? Good score anyway ;)
[Galaxy Note5 General] Willyman:
What benchmark is taht?
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
Yeah. I didn't oc but uv using arter97 kernel.

---------- Post added at 04:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:50 PM ----------

PCMark. Developed by Futuremark.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Willyman:
I've only made small changes like I described, no fixed max frequencies for example. I get a Work score of 5700, so slightly higher than stock. I will say the Gundal Kernel makes the phone run notably smoother.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Willyman:
By the way, doesn't fixing the clock speed kill the battery life or make it run very hot? Surely you only do that for the benchmark right?
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
Of course
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
Clean up the background apps and I got this
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
Awesome man! Try these other tests out and let s see how.they compare...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=63903775
[Galaxy Note5 General] ElQuixote:
I got all 10s except G3D=12. Can someone interpret that for me? Cheers.
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
The higher means the volt of ur phone is lower. And it may bring about lower power consumption or temperature. Also, you may be able to oc higher. However, it's just for reference, not all the SOCs with same avs run the same. Sometimes, the lower avs may perform better. BTW, the highest number is 15.
[Galaxy Note5 General] ruchirtrehan:
G3D is for the gpu, rest refer to the post above.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Skratch77:
I can scrore 6500 geekbench on my overclocked note 5
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
Screenshot and kernel+settings please!
[Galaxy Note5 General] Skratch77:
I'm at work and not using my note today.

Basically gov set to performance and 2.4 on big cores and 1.5 on small cores.I think I undervolted also.

I have a video of a run on YouTube just search 6500 geekbench note 5 as I'm to new to post a link of the run I did
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
What s your avs?
[Galaxy Note5 General] Skratch77:
I don't have the phone on me to check
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
If you scored that high on geekbench for real it s the highest score i ve ever seen on an exynos 7420 device. Period. Max i could get on antutu 5.7.1 was 79800 points and 6150 on geekbench.
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
It's wired that my phone doesn't run well with Skyhigh kernel. It will freeze and reboot when using 772mhz/854mhz GPU clock even 772mhz is the stock frequency. Maybe it's the new firmware to blame. I'm on self-modified stock OJD while the kernel is still based on OH6 source code.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Skratch77:
Yes my note 5 is world record holder and fastest in memory bench
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
I can t wait to see some screenshots and other test results! Looking forward for avs info, rom, kernel and maybe settings too. How s the battery lie? I got as much as 12hrs of SOT with my device and 2 days standby
[Galaxy Note5 General] Skratch77:
I can't post links yet because of my post count but just search YouTube for geekbench run.its an unlocked international note 5 on stock rom running latest skyhigh kernel.I don't use the phone much because I have Verizon and it won't work with my sim so I just got it to mess around with.

I can't remember what kernel version it was but the rom was stock with just a few apps debloated.I get about 8 hours on screen time but the phone is on wifi when in use and at least a week standby time.I go 3-4 days without touching it and surprisingly its still on.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Skratch77:
Here is my asv

8 8 8 g3d 9

I still cant upload picture yet
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
we ve got the same asv..i don t understand what u did to get that huge score in geekbench honestly :)) i havent seen such a high multicore scote for this chipset...and seeing we have the same asv i doubt it can be such a big difference honestly...i think it s all down to what u did to your rom i guess...
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Could anyone help me point a reason of this? I can't see AVS in both Synapse and RE.

But I can go further than -75mv
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
Did u give the root explorer the root access?
[Galaxy Note5 General] Skratch77:
I just looked at mv avs again and 3d was 10,not sure if that makes a difference!

htps://youtu.be/XE2jwCmKDNw

Add the t to see my video on utube

---------- Post added at 08:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:56 PM ----------

Also my highest single run was like 1740 but I can never get a good single and multi run together lol.

From memory I got 83 in antutu or 85

Can't remember if it was my gs6 or note that got the higher score
[Galaxy Note5 General] aukhan:
here is mine :

big:9, LITTLE:9, INT:9, MIF:9, G3D:12, ISP:9
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Of course yes! That's very first basic thing!
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
Wierd
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Today I handon another Note5 and saw that: my phone seem to have better chip than other. ( higher AVS )

Mine at 2100MHz need 1025mv ( stock ) can UVed 918.25mv

My friend's at 2100 need 1050mv seem can not UV much lower, about -75mv ( 975mv )

This will make the differences of some Note5 when compare about battery life, temp ...
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
my default @ 2100mhz was 1065.2mv and i can safely undervolt @ 937.5mv which is about the same as 918 or 950 - thermal throttle will occur either way because it s designed that way the only impact will be on battery life but not by much.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
My new daily voltage values. Only voltage it make a bit effect but it help your phone cooler at high load, therefore it make your battery life signification better

I think your kernel is SkyHigh. Could you show geekbenchsore?
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
what avs group are you? 10 or higher?

this is one of my highest scores. the highest record i have is 1698 single and 6155 multi. i m the first n920T on geekbench if you search for the universal7420 cpu scores
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
I stil do not know exactly avs group I have. Maybe next time of try ketan Rom I will know.

Your score is quite high but it is logical for a 2.4GHz CPU :). I'm focusing on battery life, 2.1GHz are good enough now. Maybe next year I will need 2.4GHz :)
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
well i don t keep it at 2.4 :)) it was just for testing. @ 2.1ghz i usually get 1530 single and 5200 multi.
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
Since the temperature went down for 3 day, I've tried the new UV of 2.1Ghz -- from 1018.5mv to 900mv and stroke higher scores
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
tell me how the battery life is now!
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
New score and the battery life
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Your UV just low/good at highest freq but most other steps you uved much smaller amount.

But yes, it's not really important. Show us your battery life, form full 100% to about 15% or under ). Last battery screenshow just showed you have quite good standby batt drain, but it's not enough
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
is that at 2.1ghz? i doubt it...
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
The highest score, didn't throttle very much
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
test again
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
you re on arter kernel, right? if yes which version?
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
10.0 beta2

---------- Post added at 03:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:27 PM ----------

OK, I just have 40% left now. When it goes under 15%, I will post the screenshot
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
Using mainly for Internet and music
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
How about screen on time?
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
so i found out the problem - it s the kernel :)) arter gives out different scores due to some kind of bug in the ux part...
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
That's right. Skyhigh kernel didn't work well on my phone, the big cores throttle to 800mhz and never go up unless I use synapse

---------- Post added at 09:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:59 AM ----------

16h25m2s x 24%
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
16hr screen on time? :)) that s bulls**t :))) use GSAM battery monitor and post a screenshot, please.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
He means: 4hr = 16.5h * 24%.

---------- Post added at 09:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:52 AM ----------

You want to show your very good batt as you think, but it's not simple as that. First of all you should know about what is sot and how to know/show it. The easiest way is using Gsam or BetterBatteryStats.

Or maybe just show like this
[Galaxy Note5 General] alexander1995:
I don't have the original data but a screenshot. Can't u just do the math? Is it hard to figure out 16h25m5s * 24%? If it was, I would say nothing but ask u to go back to primary school and study multiplication again

---------- Post added at 12:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:30 PM ----------

Can't u do the math? If u couldn't, ask your math teacher for help
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
You can not calculate sot like that. My screenshots show your are wrong! You should read more before post something you can't understand but disscussed on this forum thousands times :)

16h 31m * 30% = ???
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
someone should teach you some manners...end of discussion.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Manson79:
Not that bad:
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
wow you re the first case i see where the g3d is actually lower then the rest :)) i bet you can easily undervolt around -125mv on all the rest though...maybe even more..i m curious how much - if u want use arter or skyhigh and give me an idea of how well u can undervolt. i m currently at -100 with my phone...avs 8 8 8 8 9 8
[Galaxy Note5 General] Manson79:
Hi,

Hum... as far as I know "higher is better" for AVS (like Qualcomm with th pvs_bin) so I doubt that at least for the G3D I could undervolt much, for example, like you...?

I've never undervolt my Android devices but yeah I can test once in my life to see :laugh:

I use arter97's kernel, I doubt I can undervolt this part with this kernel (with skyhigh kernel it's possible in Synapse but obviously not tested) , I'll install Synapse to see :)
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
arter has synapse support too. try undervolting with -75 should be safe...and test it..run some benchmarks, even post some screenshots if u get some solid results...and after a couple.of days you can also post some battery life screenshots...use gsam battery monitor - it s the best!
[Galaxy Note5 General] Manson79:
Honestly about battery life... I don't care...

About benches... take a look here: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=64062745&postcount=8

Undervolting was, is and never will be "my cup of tea" LoL, well I can test quickly if you want but it's not the part I set with a custom kernel.

I had a s6 Edge + a few weeks ago with poor avs (like 3 3 etc...) it scores way lower in benches with EXACTLY the same kernel (arter97 / same kernel version / exactly the same settings / same apps, etc...) it was hard for me to have about 70 000 and as we know all "things" between these two phones are equal... I never got these scores in Antutu with my Edge + (and I repeat it's likely the same phone)...

Maybe the avs thing is not only about voltage and possibly overclocking..., I don't know...?
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
the avs sets some guidelines for the device's (cpu, mem, bus, g3d and memory) voltages so that it "knows" what it s margins are - in order to assure that it will perform exactly as intended although this doesn t count for the fact that benchmarks push the devices to the limits and (may) trigger thermal throttling - that s what happened with your s6 edge i believe - and it s why it couldn t score that high. My phone, when i first tested it scored only 69-70k points without undervolting - and knowing from previous experiences with other phones, undervolting does wonders both on overall performance (i may be subjective for some people s beliefs), battery life and coolness of the device (meaning it doesn t get as hot running intensive apps, or gaming) and this is a first hand observation i made with my n920t also - after undervolting by just -75mv the scores under stock rom and kernel "jumped" from 69-70k points in antutu to 71-72k under normal operating temperatures (ambient of around 22-23 degrees celcius and i would believe an internal cpu temp of around 29-30 C) - a testimony to the powers of undervolting and, this, basically getting the phone to run at par with other (higher) avs group's standard voltages - i believe my avs 8 (general) device with undervolting runs a similar voltage (after tweaking) as an AVS 13, possibly 15 device - and it's those devices (the avs group 13 and beyond) that (usually) seem to have the best performance either stock or overclocked and the best overall battery life. I ll be looking forward to see how well your phone can overclock (the best one from what i know and is currently a world record holder as far as the Note 5 goes is a n920i model which scored close to 1700 single geekbench and over 6500 multi - here s the link to that device which is currently number 1 in the note 5 department in geekbench : https://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/3599506 )
[Galaxy Note5 General] Manson79:
[MENTION=2226640]aldoblaga[/MENTION], humm... seems legit, I mean lower avs-> higher voltage-> more heat and vice versa (to resume), right?

About testing undervolt like I said it's possible but for this it's it's not my priority. Honestly I'm verry happy with my actual setup (and it took me a while to find good settings for both UI / benches like here: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=64064836&postcount=1803, so give me a bit of time).

I will test overclocking for sure but I need to flash skyhigh kernel and for now I'm running arter97 kernel so maybe next week I will test more :)

:)
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
i ll be looking forward! i wasn t trying to pressure you :))
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
According this article, I think I have good binning CPU, ASV group about 11 or 12

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9330/exynos-7420-deep-dive
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
you do - but i can t complain at all about my avs 8 device :))) i wonder if you can beat this with light use and the screen.brightness almost always dimmed or even dark...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=64112390
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
I will beat your usage if I want :)
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
looking forward to it! i want to see how low you cam undervolt...for example i m running really stable with a 937mv on 2.1ghz and 825mv on 1704mhz on the a57 cores and 925mv @ 1.5ghz on the a53 cores...i bet you can go MUCH lower
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Happy about your phone is good. But don't proud yourself too many times mate.

My usage still quite normal, mixed wifi and 3G also more apps than you :)

I aslo lost 2-3% aftet 2 times rebooted, equal to about 10-15mins SOT.
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
more apps ? what do you mean? also your app usage was 30%...i think you just kept the phone with the screen on and nothing else...that way maybe i would have gotten 16-17 hours or more SOT...your test proves nothing my friend...try again :) and also you haven t told me how far you can undervolt...
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
This kind of usage is not normally usage so I don't want to disscuss more about it. Of course I don't let screen on and do nothing because I focused on surfing and reading with black theme + low brightness.

You should stop something like world record blabla ... . It's good to share the method to do. I already shared my setup so I will not repeat here. Sorry

Ps:

- My screen eat much more percentages than you because my brightness higher than you all the time. Nothing special or secret here :).

- You changed to Power Saving mode and use grey color for all to save power. Your screenshots have some problems
[Galaxy Note5 General] ram4ufriends:
Ha ha...I cant cross 4 hours SOT and you guys are arguing over 12-16 hours...:what:
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Now, after did some optimization, I found no way to get under 4hours SOT :). I can go through a heavy day easily
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
yeah yeah:)) you re just jealous and plus i have more screenshots than you i don t know what problems you see in them :)))
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Jealous? Completely no! I don't care this kind of usage! I care only about real life usage, how to optimize the phone!
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
well i just wanted to see with very light use what i could get...si yeah, that s my maximum..or maybe i can improve it, we ll see in the next test ;)
[Galaxy Note5 General] rflmnz:
I see a lot of BS* here but no one posts their screenshots...

A kind of clash of egos is happening here. We could establish a rule here: no synapse screenshots, no post!
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
we moved the ego battle :)) over on another thread... here s the link

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=64175854
[Galaxy Note5 General] rflmnz:
You've posted the synapse settings, not the UV, but at least its a beginning! Thank you!
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
i just replied to your post.
[Galaxy Note5 General] Skratch77:
My note is still the record holder 6600 geekbench!

https://youtu.be/XE2jwCmKDNw
[Galaxy Note5 General] Chord_Hugo87:
I got same ASV but I undervolt more my max is 962mV for 2.1ghz and lowest is 600
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Maybe I got higher ASV

2.1GHz: 893.75mv

1.8GHz: 787.5mv

1.2GHz: 650mv

800MHz: 568.75mv
[Galaxy Note5 General] Chord_Hugo87:
why dont u find out? I'm sure you do, I can go down lower but its get laggy at time

can i see your A53 settings
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Because my phone doesn't have this info

A53 settings
[Galaxy Note5 General] aldoblaga:
why don t u install skyhigh kernel? then in synapse you have an Info section. i bet you have asv bigger than 10....
[Galaxy Note5 General] Zanr Zij:
Good idea! Just ASV 11 but this is silicon lottery. Higher asv may not better chip in term of UV!