yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xposed General] iSplassh:
Thanks a lot. Now i understand why Es File Explorer wouldn't get root with superSU 2.74...will follow your walkthrough to reflash everything this weekend. Last question: is MOB30M the last release?

Thanks again, you're a lifesaver [emoji1]
[Xposed General] piperx:
No problems at all with es file explorer with root and ssu 2.74 xposed 2.85, GB 6.1.3, all three nexus 5's 2 pure nexus and 1 chroma, hellscore kernel, 2 rca tablets also have no problems.
[Xposed General] grep_i:
Yes it is for Nexus 5 devices
[Xposed General] MrKite4:
Has anyone flashed Xposed on Exodus on the LG 850?
[Xposed General] magnamentis:
ES File Explorer is EXACTLY one of the top example why on MM it's recommended to stay with v2.68, 2.71-2.74 are made for N-Preview in mind

and then they work with MM but not some badly coded apps.

as long as an app is exactly the way i like it and there is no good replacement i give a sh...t as to old code hence prefer to use an older SSU variant that works flawlessly and without restrictions.

( there is a perfect replacement for FSFE, use "Solid Explorer instead it's not only better but nicer and up to date without adds.)

similar applies to Xposed v80 and later, v80 was made for majority of devices and from v2.81 attempts were made to optimize it to work with devices and roms that didn't work or not properly before. that was nice for those "few" owners of such devices and users of such roms but apparently came with a bunch of issues for many others, depending always on the modules of course. same issue, non-up to date modules

started to cause issues but if i need the module and there is not other or better, i will choose to go for the combo that works and not for the

theoretically more "modern" one :)
[Xposed General] andrew_case:
Am asking for huewai phones with emui... for example I can't use xposed framework for.my honor 3c ... options to install xposed framework are greyed out ...

And a warning message with reaources subclass is appearing..
[Xposed General] grep_i:
In your own way you're right.

In my opinion it is better to update and let developers know about the problems you met when using their code, software or app so they know about this problems and they can fix them.
[Xposed General] lawtalking:
xposed stopped working

I had previously had xposed working, but then my phone had soft bricked, and I reflashed stock firmware through fastboot. It is a Moto X Pure XT 1575. I have tried on an AOSP rom and a stock rom, but keep getting this message

"Xposed is not (yet) compatible with android sdk version 23 or your processor architecture (arm64-v8a)"

I have tried multiple versions of sdk23-arm64 framework, and keep getting the same message.

Anyone know of how to fix this?
[Xposed General] Ja_som:
Do you have the right apk installed?
[Xposed General] ianmacd:
Recommended by whom? ChainFire's vast array of CF Auto Roots all use the latest version of SuperSU, and those are built for L and M.

Sometimes, the only way forward is to break bad code. If we all waited for people to update their dependent code before releasing new versions of our own software, then complex systems like kernels would never see another major release.

Besides, there are compatibility workarounds in recent versions of SuperSU for outdated apps. It's not hard to get ES File Explorer to work, although as everyone is fond of pointing out these days, much better alternative file managers exist.
[Xposed General] lawtalking:
I was sure I did, but I redownloaded, and it is working now.
[Xposed General] :
I have oneplus one and cm13 version ZNHOEAS2JK and always when i flash xposed zip and my phone starts my phone will restart.. I tried v85/77 sdk23 arm version and same issue?
[Xposed General] magnamentis:
recommended by ME in favour of the people who simply want there apps and modules to work

your post is totally off what i replied to as well as what i said. for people like you i even mentioned that it's the apps that are not up to speed

and that the stuff works on MM except for such app.

so your entire post is useless except to defend your own setup, no helping people in mind, only what you use and what works for you is best.

furhter chainfire is not a religious thing for me. he makes the software and he does it perfectly well and that's it, nevertheless each user has the

right to use a module or an app that even when it's not up to latest standards works with certain components.

i even mentioned, again with people like you in mind, that sooner or later app devs have to update their stuff.

the people i replied to have a problem and i told them how to solve their problem. i cannot tell anyone which apps he has to use.

so even if you disagree which you don't because you just repeated what i wrote in other words and with a tone, you could simply accept

that others don't want to have things broken now, ahead of time. it's the user who decides (consumer) what he uses and only fanboys buy into

everything their gods (idols) serve them.

you don't have to reply because i won't see it, ignore list is greating, horrible, you spoiled my day but perhaps that makes you happy.
[Xposed General] BTslo:
Bump, disabled Adaway and Minminguard but still the same.
[Xposed General] mielletseed:
horribly arrogant in my opinion...

Your answer is far from adequate to the message you are replying to.

I also disagree with your recommendation to stay on old versions just to be compatible with poorly coded apps that are not updated to newer standards. This is *developer* forum, not *consumer* forum.

Could you please add me to your ignore list too?
[Xposed General] magnamentis:
as to you opinion, that's your free choice, i only know that i never have issues and many have and many of those are related to the two pieces of software.

tha fact that you don't have issues does in now way mean anything because obviously you neither use a module that is not updated to work with later than v80 versions nor an app that does not play well with later than v2.68 SSU. that's good for you but for those who use such modules and such apps and, the arrogance would be to tell them not to use what they came to like, my solution works which is not arrogant but a fact and helpful for those who need it.

further it's a know fact that ignorance sees knowlege as arrogant makes sense because it's like a mirror showing a mediocre picture.

and then i know exactly what i read and what i wrote. IMO it's very to the point but again not everyone can see behind things, i simply don't care.

the only thing i know that those who take my advice well usually end up with a working device and the others one can see posting their issues over weeks and months, always the same people. as mentioned above if someone does not use a certain app or module that has issues in a certain setup (combo of device, rom, kernel and setup ) does not mean it does not exist for others.

so you jump to the conclusion that if you don't have a specific problem that this is the norm. now i ask you to read the definition of arrogance and will find out that the truth is the truth and assuming things based on your own situation is arrogant. so who is arrogant then. further where comes the urge from to reply at all? it's OT it has nothing to do with xposed and the problems some users had, while as you can read back a page or two, my recommendation worked, it solved his problem and for many others. the entire discussion only started because some guys who have no issues with v85 and SSU 2.74 felt attacked by the statement that in some cases it would be better to stay on the older variants and since i have 7 devices and 13 roms to maintain i usually choose the components that are flash and forget, means those that always work, and of course if someone has an issue that is related i recommend to to the same, that's not arrogant but it works and in case of trouble is the way to solve the problem.

further if you look at my stats, do you really think a non-dev who does not receive hundreds of thanks for a single post sometimes can get such results over many years with arrogance and posting non-sense? just keep it to yourself and do your thing and let others do theirs.

what do you think if you once need help and someone knows the answer but does not post because it's not popular to tell the facts and the risk to get bashed is too high? do you have any idea how many knowing people and able developers retired and are only lurking because of young respectless people like you who ultimately keep others from helping those who need it?
[Xposed General] :
In the mobile development world, one person's fact is another person's maybe, if, or no way. Too many variables here to say anyone is 100% right, or 100% wrong.

It's all opinion and preference.

Let's all get along anyways. K?

:good:

P.S. yes, that means enough please.
[Xposed General] ldeveraux:
Jeez, this was the most civil, thought out discussion I've ever seen on xda, why would you squash it? Off topic a bit, but come on, give us a break...
[Xposed General] :
Posting respectfully is an important part of xda. That was waivering, very much so.

And squash? I deleted nothing in case you didn't notice. Go ahead, discuss, but keep it light. :good:
[Xposed General] ldeveraux:
you effectively put an end to their conversation with your PS. Call it whatever you want to. But I'll try to keep it light and skip this thread next time I guess.
[Xposed General] :
If you have an issue with a moderators action, please use Private messages, as to not derail the thread further. :good:

Cheers!
[Xposed General] Portgas D. Ace:
Wipe Xposed Installer's cache and reboot.
[Xposed General] ianmacd:
There's a big difference between "why on MM it's recommended to stay with v2.68", which is what you originally wrote, and "recommended by me that you stay with v2.68", which you didn't write, but now say is what you meant.

Obviously, English isn't your native tongue, so I'll explain it to you:

"It's recommended" uses the passive voice and creates the impression of either:

1. a general consensus, presumably resulting from mass use of the software under discussion on a multitude of hardware and software configurations.

or:

2. the official recommendation of the author of the software under discussion, in this case ChainFire's SuperSU.

.Both impressions are inappropriate in your case, because you were giving just your own opinion, which whilst possibly worthwhile, does not carry the weight of either consensus or a statement from the software's developer. Better would have been to use the active voice, specifically the use of the first person subject pronoun 'I', to indicate that you were giving a personal opinion, not trying to represent either consensus or an official source.

So, your advice in this case could have misled users into following a course of action that they mistakenly believed to be either the collectively wisest or officially sanctioned, and which they might not have followed, had they known that it was just your opinion.

It's actually no different in German, which I believe is your native language.

Believe it or not, public replies on XDA aren't written just for you. It's important for others to understand the context of your overreaction.

This is my final word on the subject.
[Xposed General] mielletseed:
And not to forget (@magnamentis) rovo89 asked people not to advice others to stay on older versions for convenience reasons.
[Xposed General] grep_i:
[MENTION=7187684]ianmacd[/MENTION] & [MENTION=5522383]mielletseed[/MENTION].

I totally agree let's not stay on old software for convenience reasons.

Let us report all issues to the responsible devs and let them fix their software so we all can benefit from good software.

I personally find it disappointing that [MENTION=5372360]magnamentis[/MENTION] blocks you if your opinion differs from his.

This does not open the way for healthy discussions on the subject matter.
[Xposed General] dirtyreturn:
http://cloud.tapatalk.com/s/5759e0105ae93/xposed_error_20160609_172809.txt

I am currently using version 83(could someone point me into the direction of v85?) and in the closed app it is showing as installed but not active. I have provided a log. Could anyone please take a look and possibly help me to have it as active?

I own a nexus 6p and have twisted as my primary ROM. Thinking back, before the ROM was rebased xposed worked just fine. So, probably a ROM issue, right?

Attached is a log from xposed.
[Xposed General] AB256:
Ultra noob question alert.

Why am I not able to actually download any files from this link? http://dl-xda.xposed.info/framework/

I need the sdk23 zip file :/
[Xposed General] Ja_som:
Download works, try different browser...
[Xposed General] AB256:
Clicking on the links just keeps navigating through the zip file.

If I do right click -> save link as , it tries to download the HTML page. :confused:

P.S - Tried all 3 browsers that I have.
[Xposed General] JochenP:
Download works from handy browser...
[Xposed General] Ja_som:
It works as is should for me on Chrome (PC and also Android), click = download
[Xposed General] AB256:
Never mind, I was being a massive noob there. I thought the whole sdk23 was a package which I needed to download. Finally I figured, and downloaded the latest version. Thanks.
[Xposed General] Oswald Boelcke:
Download works for me on Google Chrome 64-bit, Firefox 64-bit and MS Edge.
[Xposed General] mrYogii:
xposed is not yet compatible

nexus 5 cm13 :

i flashed xposed-v85-sdk23-arm.zip framework zip in recovery and then installed xposed installer apk .

But i am getting: "Xposed is not yet compatible to your android sdk version 23 or your preccessor architecture (armeabi - v7a) CANNOT LINK EXECUTABLE: could not load library "libdvm.so"

what i am missing?
[Xposed General] Oswald Boelcke:
I'm not really familiar with Nexus 5; however, I believe it has a 64-bit processor i.e. flash v85 sdk23 arm64.
[Xposed General] mrYogii:
The Nexus 5 runs a Snapdragon 800, which is not a 64-bit supported processor. That means i need to be going for the arm version of Xposed, and not the arm64 version.
[Xposed General] Portgas D. Ace:
Try installing the Materialized Xposed Installer. It is the same as the official one, but with material design. This issue normally arises if you install an older Xposed Installer.
[Xposed General] Oswald Boelcke:
Roger, thanks for the advice. As I said I'm not really familiar with this device.

However, Google talks on the page http://www.google.com/nexus/5x/ about a 64-bit six-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 (see screenshot).
[Xposed General] Ja_som:
There is a BIG difference between Nexus 5 and Nexus 5X ;)
[Xposed General] mrYogii:
yes that was the problem , now framework is detected, thanks!

---------- Post added at 04:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:49 PM ----------

And every one at xda atleast is familiar with nexus devices :)
[Xposed General] Oswald Boelcke:
I apologise for being so ignorant and not having been familiar with the famous Nexus devices, but now I got it. Actually, if I had read more precisely what was written I should have recognised the difference between Snapdragon 800 and 808. My fault, and I promise not to bother you again.

I'm glad that at least at XDA everyone is familiar with Nexus devices; however, I'm even happier that not everyone is arrogant at XDA.
[Xposed General] Biaviian:
I have a Nexus 6 and I am getting the following error when I try to flash the sdk23-arm.

Updater process ended with ERROR: 1

Error installing zip file /sdcard/zip/exposed-v85-sdk23-arm.zip

I have installed this on lollipop with no issues but on 6.0.1 (Build MOB30I) I am having issues.

Any ideas?
[Xposed General] siealex:
What version of twrp?
[Xposed General] Nergal di Cuthah:
Who are you asking (use quotes please, cause I'm confused easily [emoji14]

---------- Post added at 11:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 AM ----------

Can you provide the entirety of the log, did you make room in your system partition by uninstalling/moving-to-user unneeded system apps: keyboard languages, and Google Apps that are available via Playstore (like Youtube, Hangouts,Chrome) are the best to remove
[Xposed General] Biaviian:
That is one thing I forgot to do. Thanks!
[Xposed General] Nergal di Cuthah:
no prob, most manufacturers (including Google, with NEXUS) filled the system partition for marshmallow
[Xposed General] ForeverMinM:
how to work properly

I'm running MM 6.0.1 on a S6 Edge, obviously with a TWRP and a custom ROM that ended up replacing my Sub-model from a Canadian version (SM-G925W8) to the Global, so now it shows as G925F. Just trying ti give out as much information as possible..

now heres the issue, I downloaded the .apk to my phone, installed it and of course it said "you do not have the proper framework installed" or what not cause i hadn't gotten that far. I downloaded the SDK23 for ARM64 V76 (after V85) didn't work .zip file, not .zip.asc because im not even sure if that has any relevance in the process, if it does please let me know.

once i started installing the framework, I believe it got stuck in a boot-loop.. now i know its suppose to take longer than average because of the clearance of a certain cache, but its been booting for a good 20 minutes.. i'm going to load my backup, but any idea how to make this work for me? maybe a full written tutorial? idk, thanks!!
[Xposed General] Nergal di Cuthah:
is the custom ROM still touchwiz based (still look/act like a samsung phone) if so you need the Wanam Xposed Fork

http://xdaforums.com/xposed/unofficial-xposed-samsung-lollipop-t3180960/

From the Read-Only Thread for xPosed
[Xposed General] ForeverMinM:
Yeah it is still touchwiz based. Never knew that much made a difference. But that link worked, thanks man!

---------- Post added at 11:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 PM ----------

Yeah it is still touchwiz based, never knew that made a difference. But that link worked, thanks man!
[Xposed General] Miyaku:
Hello, i get error, this a log

06-13 02:00:21.712 I/Xposed ( 300): -----------------
06-13 02:00:21.713 I/Xposed ( 300): Starting Xposed version 85, compiled for SDK 23
06-13 02:00:21.713 I/Xposed ( 300): Device: MI 4W (Xiaomi), Android version 6.0.1 (SDK 23)
06-13 02:00:21.713 I/Xposed ( 300): ROM: MMB29M
06-13 02:00:21.713 I/Xposed ( 300): Build fingerprint: Xiaomi/cancro_wc_lte/cancro:6.0.1/MMB29M/6.4.14:user/release-keys
06-13 02:00:21.713 I/Xposed ( 300): Platform: armeabi-v7a, 32-bit binary, system server: yes
06-13 02:00:21.713 I/Xposed ( 300): SELinux enabled: yes, enforcing: no
06-13 02:00:22.953 I/Xposed ( 749): Forcing image recompilation because /data/dalvik-cache/arm/system@framework@boot.art is not compiled for the current Xposed version
06-13 02:00:25.226 I/Xposed ( 300): -----------------
06-13 02:00:25.227 I/Xposed ( 300): Added Xposed (/system/framework/XposedBridge.jar) to CLASSPATH
06-13 02:00:25.268 I/Xposed ( 300): Forcing image recompilation because /data/dalvik-cache/arm/system@framework@boot.art is not compiled for the current Xposed version
06-13 02:01:24.957 I/Xposed ( 300): Detected ART runtime
06-13 02:01:24.964 I/Xposed ( 300): Found Xposed class de/robv/android/xposed/XposedBridge, now initializing
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): Error while loading XResources class 'android/content/res/XResources':
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: android.content.res.XResources
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): at java.lang.Class dalvik.system.DexFile.defineClassNative(java.lang.String, java.lang.ClassLoader, java.lang.Object) (DexFile.java:-2)
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): at java.lang.Class dalvik.system.DexFile.defineClass(java.lang.String, java.lang.ClassLoader, java.lang.Object, java.util.List) (DexFile.java:226)
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): at java.lang.Class dalvik.system.DexFile.loadClassBinaryName(java.lang.String, java.lang.ClassLoader, java.util.List) (DexFile.java:219)
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): at java.lang.Class dalvik.system.DexPathList.findClass(java.lang.String, java.util.List) (DexPathList.java:338)
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): at java.lang.Class dalvik.system.BaseDexClassLoader.findClass(java.lang.String) (BaseDexClassLoader.java:54)
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): at java.lang.Class java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String, boolean) (ClassLoader.java:511)
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): at java.lang.Class java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String) (ClassLoader.java:469)
06-13 02:01:25.032 E/Xposed ( 300): at boolean de.robv.android.xposed.XposedBridge.initNative() (XposedBridge.java:-2)
06-13 02:01:25.033 E/Xposed ( 300): at void de.robv.android.xposed.XposedBridge.main(java.lang.String[]) (XposedBridge.java:113)
06-13 02:01:25.033 I/Xposed ( 300): Errors during native Xposed initialization

How to fix this?
[Xposed General] zelendel:
'

You will have to find the one made to work with MIUI. They make changes to the art runtime that doesnt mess well with Googles runtime.
[Xposed General] Miyaku:
its work now.. thanks
[Xposed General] JoaoMarcos:
Only a question, we, that use cm13, we can see in changelog that cm developers are always improving Art, but, xposed, that is a modified Art runtime, it can cause issues with cm13? 'Cause every time that I try to use xposed in cm13, my phone get slow, it with no modules activated, and always errors in xposed log (like SIS GPE errors).

Ps: sorry for my bad English, I'm learning xD
[Xposed General] Portgas D. Ace:
Try the systemless Xposed for now, it doesn't slow down my phone at all.
[Xposed General] Zorachus:
Xposed just stopped working out of the blue all of a sudden, saying "

Xposed framework version 85 is installed, but not active. Please check the logs for details

."

I have been running Xposed perfectly fine on my HTC 10 for the past couple weeks, zero issues whatsoever, running perfect. I am on LeeDroid ROM, just run several typical modules with no problems; like Amplify, Greenify, YouTube AdAway, etc...

Well I just went to try out new mod to me, NotifyClean, installed it, rebooted, and played around a bit with it, didn't really like it, so I uninstalled it. Then rebooted, and it came back saying Xposed no longer active. I rebooted to Recovery again, flashed my Xposed zip, which is the latest one from May 28, rebooted, and again still saying Xposed not active.
[Xposed General] Nergal di Cuthah:
That would be the first step, perhaps provide us with a log
[Xposed General] Annunneo:
Try flashing the uninstaller reboot then flash over xposed clearing both cache. I had a similar weird problem and that remedied it.
[Xposed General] Zorachus:
I cleared cache and cleared data from the Settings - Apps menu, then rebooted to Recovery, flashed Xposed again, booted up and all was working fine again.
[Xposed General] grep_i:
Most probable cause would be you had the Xposed "disabled" file in the install folder.

Removing that file with a file explorer, there are numerous of them, would have solved your problem.

Uninstalling the framework would also remove that file because the complete folder gets deleted but it's a bit extreme but yes it works
[Xposed General] Rapper_skull:
[MENTION=4419114]rovo89[/MENTION] Do you have any plans of an official systemless Xposed?

Inviato dal mio Nexus 5X utilizzando Tapatalk
[Xposed General] Djiribundi:
I can't unninstall xposed. When I try to flash the .zip posted on this thread

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3034811

I get this message:

"could not extract meta-inf/com/google/android/update-binary"

Any help?

Using CandySix ROM on LG G3s, TWRP
[Xposed General] mikexmayhem:
I cannot seem to get xposed installed. I've tried 3 version and I get the same type of error shown in the screen shot.

I'm on a sprint s5 running the latest official CM13
[Xposed General] Nergal di Cuthah:
You're running the wrong version of xPosed installer, you need to be running 3 alpha4 you can find a link to it in the xPosed read-only thread first post
[Xposed General] mikexmayhem:
that easy. thank you. i dont know how some different version got there. i didnt even realize. all is well.