yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] rfnreynders:
Hi to all wizzkids,

Installed latest nightly, and when booting i see this message:

Kernel is not seandroid enforcing

Set warranty bit : kernel

Is this normal ?

The rom loads and works.

Also it constantly shows preparing samsung sd card ? when the rom is loaded ?

Anyone ? help ?

thx in advance,

cheers,

Rene
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ScratMan38:
[MENTION=5795145]javelinanddart[/MENTION] : looks like your vfs61xx stuff broke something. My battery drains fast with a wakelock called vfsspi keeping the phone awake 100% of the time.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] javelinanddart:
Are you on nightlies? My vfs61xx patch did not cause wakelocks, it in fact fixed that wakelock
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] haggertk:
Or more fundamentally, are you using stock nightly kernel? That patch explicitly removed the spi wakelock "feature". And I've been using that patch on both cm13 and cm14 for nearly a week.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ScratMan38:
That's it. It was by using Boeffla kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] 0kti:
Do not worry. It's normal message on all custom roms

Nothing to worry about.

Tapatalk Galaxy S5
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] phalkon30:
Are you wiping system and both caches before installing the rom? I haven't upgraded to the 3.x TWRP, but maybe check if there's an update there?

Can't hurt, this rom has been fixed so that you can run any bootloader. You may find less issues even on the newest bootloader (but probably no change)

Sent from my SM-G900R4 (klteusc) running CM13 9.12.16 with xposed
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] boind:
I am using the factory reset (data, cache and dalvik). When I am trying to wipe system I get an error.

So you suggest flashing newest stock and then right afterwards new cm? Am I right?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
Could you report this issue in Boeffla thread maybe?

Regards

Gesendet von meinem SM-G900F mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] rfnreynders:
Thx for the info, now i can sleep again :)

cheers,

Rene
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] javelinanddart:
I'm asking a friend to pull request it to [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]'s git repo

EDIT: done: https://github.com/andip71/boeffla-kernel-cm-s5/pull/1
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bryanx86:
Go to mount option in recovery, and put check mark on system
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Cdub1976:
Just wipe system then flash the ROM and the aroma package and you're in business. You're settings, apps, and data will stay intact.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] boind:
I will try this later after i return from work. :)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Bluefreak1988:
Is there anybody else having problems with Bluetooth?

Asked some pages ago. Media is possible with my car but not phone calls.

Can't find calls a solution for that...
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ScratMan38:
In latest TWRP there is an option to mount system as read only, make sure the recovery is forced to mount system as read/write.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] boind:
I did made sure it is. Still stuck at "patching system image unconditionally"
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
Flashed the Alexander Rom, battery from 100 to 94% in 10 hours. Much better than the CM13 with Boeffla right? (100 to 91% in 10 hours) Screen off all the time. I will try CM13 with the standard kernel of CM13 tonight.

By the way, all the links dont work in your first posts:

G900* Unified-GSM : cm-13.0-20151227-UNOFFICIAL-klte.zip | Browse KLTE Build Archive

GAPPS: : Slim_mini_gapps.BETA.6.0.build.0.x-20151106.zip

GAPPS #2 : gapps-600-base-20151104-1-signed.zip
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
A placebo. There are a number of system services, syncs, internet connection, app wakelocks that could have done that.

Did you even take average? Like takes 3 different reading from 100 to 90 3 different days? ????
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
Settings were the same on both Roms, Internet was off, Sync was off, installed all the same apps. (Around 10). You 're right, I have to do it again to conclude. I'll reinstall CM without Boeffla first.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
Alexandr ROM is completely Samsung stock based and therefore the uptime is better because it uses original samsung drivers, CM uses his own built drivers. A CM ROM or CM based ROM is normally never better in battery uptime than stock or stock based ROMs.

regards
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
My S3 was 100 - 97% in 10 hours on CM13, boeffla (screen off, greenify, internet off), (2100mah S3 vs 2800mah S5 mind you)
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
Hahah don't do it dude. I was joking. My point was that a few ? difference over 8-10 hours could be due to a number of factors outside anyones control. Don't be so anal about it.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jdrch:
Wouldn't that make my adopted microSD card data unreadable and force me to resync all my files to it?

---------- Post added at 01:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------

Thanks for the screenshot. I'm kinda confused as to why I'd be flashing 7.0 Gapps to a 6.0 ROM though. Sounds like it would cause even more problems.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Cdub1976:
It shouldn't . All you're doing is wiping the system partition not anything else.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jdrch:
Alright just checking. I'll probably try that this weekend then.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] TEFjLONjDON:
That post I wrote was and OT post in regards to issues someone was having with an N 7.0 alpha test version of AICP. Not about this ROM available in the OP.

Sorry for the confusion caused by all the off topic posts here lately. Perhaps moderator can clean up this thread a bit.

In your case its still some what relevant as all you have to do is make sure you don't wipe your sd or USB partions and you won't loss your sd card content. Flash what ever ROM your using (clean if your switching in which case you'll need Gapps too.) and (dirty if your updating) (clean is always better) in any case make sure you've downloaded the correct Gapps package for the ROM base your flashing. No need to download or flash Gapps if your updating a Rom you've been using that already has play store functionality.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] jdrch:
Update: problem fixed in latest build.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
A Summary of the battery life when screen off and disabled internet, nfc, location, lights, silence sound profile, gestures, double tap, adaptive brightness, weather etc. Screen on: 10 times for one second per test, average. The same installed apps per test, including greenify.

Test 1: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (31 min), 98 (30 min), 97 (13 min), 96 (13 min), 95, (26 min), 94 (26 min), 93 (63 min), 92, (240 min), 91 (168 min).

Average: 68 min.

Test 2: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (119 min), 98 (35 min), 97 (64 min), 96 (79 min).

Average: 64 min.

Test 3: Alexander Rom, ROM Kernel - 100, 99 (27 min), 98 (21 min), 97 (30 min), 96 (53 min), 95 (106 min, 94 (192 min), 93 (513 min!!), 92 (189 min).

Average: 141 min

Test 4: CM13, ROM Kernel - Tomorrow

Test 5: XtreSto Lite - Day after Tomorrow

Test 6: Omega - In 3 days
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
If by any chance you are using the latest nightly of cm13 with boeffla you are going to get bad battery life due to a wakelock. Boeffla kernel hasn't been updated to include that file yet so until that time if you are using an older build of boeffla with newer nightly you are going to get bad battery life as evident by the number of posts on RR thread.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
Thanks, I didnt know about the wakelock. But I used the 3.2 beta Cm13 boeffla so thats the most recent one so I guess there is no wakelock there? I'll find out in 9 hours if the average is better without Boeffla. 2 exact hours underway and 2% down.

On the S3 the Boeffla is doing great though, so I guess the wakelock of Boeffla is just for the S5 then.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Atento:
Is XtreSto still under development for 900f?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
Yes, I think it's not under development anymore. Update of CM13, without Boeffla looks more promising. I'm def not gna use the Boeffla on S5.

A Summary of the battery life when screen off and disabled internet, nfc, location, lights, silence sound profile, gestures, double tap, adaptive brightness, weather etc. Screen on: 10 times for one second per test, average. The same installed apps per test, including greenify.

Test 1: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (31 min), 98 (30 min), 97 (13 min), 96 (13 min), 95, (26 min), 94 (26 min), 93 (63 min), 92, (240 min), 91 (168 min).

Average: 68 min.

Test 2: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (119 min), 98 (35 min), 97 (64 min), 96 (79 min).

Average: 64 min.

Test 3: Alexander Rom, ROM Kernel - 100, 99 (27 min), 98 (21 min), 97 (30 min), 96 (53 min), 95 (106 min, 94 (192 min), 93 (513 min!!), 92 (189 min).

Average: 141 min.

Test 4: CM13, ROM Kernel, screen on 3 times for 1 sec - 100, 99 (56min), 98 (34 min), 97 (96 min), 96 (111 min), 95 (178 min), 94 (150) min).

Average: 104 min.

Test 5: Omega, Tomorrow

Test 6: RR, day after Tomorrow
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ScratMan38:
Boeffla kernel 3.2 beta has been released on 09/30, including commits merged before 8:00 AM (CET) on the same day ; while there are important CM13 commits both on ROM and kernel side merged after Boeffla kernel was released, like for example big changes in the code for fingerprint scanner.

So the latest CM13 nightlies are not in line with the Boeffla kernel 3.2 beta 2, and it generates some errors, with some wakelocks keeping the phone awake, so it never switches to deep sleep or doze.

The kernel is still maintained by Lord Boeffla, but he is on vacation till the 9th of October, so we will have to wait for him to update the kernel with the latest CM13 commits. The kernel is not heavily developped because S5 is not his main phone anymore, so there will be no new special features embedded, but he continues to keep it up to date vs CM13 nightlies and provide support.

On my side, with CM13 and Boeffla kernel (when it was in line with nightlies), when I let the phone sleep on my desk with network and data On, low power location On, sync On,... I get from 1.5% to 2.0% of battery drain per hour, that means minimum 5 hours to drain 10%. And I have generally from 3 to 4 hours of SOT with a 100% to 30% discharge with my usage.

I tried Alexndr ROM for two weeks, battery discharge rate was never below 2.0% per hour, and I usually had between 2 to 3 hours of SOT.

So, yes, maybe Touchwiz has better hardware optimization, and drains less battery when network, wifi, data, sync, etc... are off ; but when you use it as a standard phone, with network, data, sync... the bloatware inside drains the battery faster than CM.

.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
I would repeat this test when Lord Boeffla has released an update of his kernel as [MENTION=3609110]ScratMan38[/MENTION] mentioned before ;):good:

regards
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Fil in XDA:
Hello guys. I just noticed that the gaming performance in cm13 is kinda bit laggy. There were frame stutters and kind of choppy. I compared the gaming performance of cm12.1, stock TouchWiz and cm13. Cm12.1 has the best gaming performance out of all three. It's just something that I noticed and I'm not a gamer. Is it because of the mm kernel/blobs hasn't merged yet?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] airidosas252:
Simple reason - cm13's cpu governor settings are pretty messed up, that's why it's laggy. For now switch to conservative governor to see the difference.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
Can you please post the interactive governed settings from stock rom? I want to set that up in kernel auditor to see if it makes any difference.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ScratMan38:
Did you manage to get a log on your side ?

I tried on my side to set the modem back to LTE preferred, and recorded the log for more than one hour.

I confirm that in "LTE preferred", while my phone was using a H+ (HSPAP) connection at my office, I had RIL errors and restart every 12 minutes and 38 seconds.

Then I set the phone to "3G preferred", and then I had no more "ERR_RilError" in the log.

Logcat is attached
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] systemcrash:
Latest nightly https://download.cyanogenmod.org/get/jenkins/182117/cm-13.0-20161005-NIGHTLY-klte.zip all good.

fingerprint much better (changes in https://download.cyanogenmod.org/get/jenkins/181636/cm-13.0-20161002-NIGHTLY-klte.zip ), screen brightness OK, although minimum brightness a little brighter than before. Thermal engine changes also mean a cooler boot/upgrade (changes in https://download.cyanogenmod.org/get/jenkins/181492/cm-13.0-20161001-NIGHTLY-klte.zip ).
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] omgbossis21:
I can no longer recreate the issue which is odd after having it since I can't remember when. Only thing I can say ive changed is my theme (I was always using the same non stock one) and ive added a repeater to my WiFi which is only for a roommate and I shouldn't be connecting to it at all. I'll switch back to that theme and see if I can recreate it.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] boind:
Hey guys,

I was finally able to update cm. Unfortunally efs was not mounted. However during this process I tried to update my modem and bootloader by flashing the newest Stock-Rom from sammobile. This failed due to a missing file in the .zip (according to TWRP). Is there another way to update modem and bootloader? I am still on December 15 BL and Modem.

Best regards

boind
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
You' re right, I will.

Below an update of the CM13, and I can say, its number one now! Seems like most peak at 93 %.. interesting.

Wakelocks: 28x Whatsapp, 6x Google Calender, 15x Show Keyguard, 7x Alarm, 6x Calender Storage. I never use Calender, I should install it for less wakelocks. And Keyguard is when I turn the screen on? I didnt put an alarm, and it still does a wakelock for it? Weird.

Battery life: Screen off, disabled internet, nfc, location, lights, silence sound profile, gestures, double tap, adaptive brightness, weather, greenify etc. Screen on: 10 times for one second per test, average. The same installed apps per test.

Test 1: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (31 min), 98 (30 min), 97 (13 min), 96 (13 min), 95, (26 min), 94 (26 min), 93 (63 min), 92, (240 min), 91 (168 min).

Average: 68 min.

Test 2: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (119 min), 98 (35 min), 97 (64 min), 96 (79 min).

Average: 64 min.

Test 3: Alexander Rom, ROM Kernel - 100, 99 (27 min), 98 (21 min), 97 (30 min), 96 (53 min), 95 (106 min, 94 (192 min), 93 (513 min!!), 92 (189 min).

Average: 141 min.

Test 4: CM13, ROM Kernel, Screen on for nearly 2 minutes, so could have been higher. - 100, 99 (56min), 98 (34 min), 97 (96 min), 96 (111 min), 95 (178 min), 94 (150) min), 93 (419 min), 92 (240 min).

Average: 161 min.

Test 5: Resurrection Remix, Tomorrow. Omega is sooo slow in downloading.

Test 6: Omega, day after Tomorrow
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Zoomed:
I don't know whether the CM13's governor has issues or not, but there's also ZRAM settings. CM13 has ZRAM enabled, and CM12.1 didn't. I personally reduce the swappiness(from 60 to 50) and ZRAM size (to 300MB) and it seems to help reduce stuttering in general use (I don't usually play mobile games).
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] AOD_Corwin:
Have lots of Bluetooth stutter
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
Battery life: Screen off, everything off:

Test 1: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (31 min), 98 (30 min), 97 (13 min), 96 (13 min), 95, (26 min), 94 (26 min), 93 (63 min), 92, (240 min), 91 (168 min).

Average: 68 min.

Test 2: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (119 min), 98 (35 min), 97 (64 min), 96 (79 min).

Average: 64 min.

Test 3: Alexander Rom, ROM Kernel - 100, 99 (27 min), 98 (21 min), 97 (30 min), 96 (53 min), 95 (106 min, 94 (192 min), 93 (513 min!!), 92 (189 min).

Average: 141 min.

Test 4: CM13, ROM Kernel, Screen on for nearly 2 minutes, so could have been higher. - 100, 99 (56min), 98 (34 min), 97 (96 min), 96 (111 min), 95 (178 min), 94 (150) min), 93 (419 min), 92 (240 min).

Average: 161 min.

Test 5: Resurrection Remix: 99 (32 min), 98 (12 min), 97 (29 min). 96 (86 min). 95 (91 min), 94 (522 min). Average:

129 min

Test 6: Omega, Tomorrow
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] systemcrash:
pick one here: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=18030

https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=18028

flash with your choice of software (odin). pull battery out, hold power btn. flash again. voila.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] boind:
Thanks! What about the files in sammobile? Are they like the same?

*EDIT*

Now I get it. Can someone maybe explain the Syntax of the BL's and CP's? And do i have to reflash cm afterwards?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] Triviox:
I make update to last nigth, now i see dont have fingerprint; and cant see where active it... in lockscreem i dont know it.. i have g500m.

Thanks!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] sunilpaulmathew:
Anybody tried this unofficial cm-14.0 ROM by our developer [MENTION=2693412]haggertk[/MENTION].
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] systemcrash:
Since we've no more recent news that CM14 boots further than the "frankenstein manifest", no. I suppose this may be a proof of further progress. Nandroid and try it.

Edit: Most everything works smoothly, but running Google Fit crashes spectacularly. [MENTION=2693412]haggertk[/MENTION] Attaching logcat. ( Appears to be surfaceflinger ) Ah well, a bit more to go then I suppose. Looks good so far though!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
Yeah I am running that now. However playing a video in YouTube app reboots the phone.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
Cool, Im gna flash CM14 in a bit and check the screen off time hehe.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] haggertk:
Yes, it's still nowhere close. I purposely didn't post links because we (the maintainers) knew it's not ready, but I'll leave builds up so long as:

1. No questions about when things will be done

- They will be done when they are done. We're busy with more than just CM, but we want working N on our phones just as much as all of you.

2. No questions about when a new build will be posted

- They will or will not show up like magic

3. No requests for links to new builds

- I will create a thread and post links when we feel that things are in good shape in our subjective opinion.

4. I'll take logcats, but no questions about when the problems in those logcats will be fixed

And yes we know that you cannot record a video. That affects pretty much every device not released in the last year. It's not a klte thing, but the best people in the cyanogenmod team are looking at trying to work around the mediaserver/encoder architecture changes that Google added to N.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
Battery life: Screen off, everything off:

Test 1: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (31 min), 98 (30 min), 97 (13 min), 96 (13 min), 95, (26 min), 94 (26 min), 93 (63 min), 92, (240 min), 91 (168 min).

Average: 68 min.

Test 2: CM13, Boeffla 3.2 - 100, 99 (119 min), 98 (35 min), 97 (64 min), 96 (79 min).

Average: 74 min.

Test 3: Alexander Rom, ROM Kernel - 100, 99 (27 min), 98 (21 min), 97 (30 min), 96 (53 min), 95 (106 min, 94 (192 min), 93 (513 min!!), 92 (189 min).

Average: 141 min.

Test 4: CM13, ROM Kernel, Screen on for nearly 2 minutes, so could have been higher. - 100, 99 (56min), 98 (34 min), 97 (96 min), 96 (111 min), 95 (178 min), 94 (150) min), 93 (419 min), 92 (240 min).

Average: 161 min

.

Test 5: Resurrection Remix: 99 (32 min), 98 (12 min), 97 (29 min). 96 (86 min). 95 (91 min), 94 (522 min).

Average: 129 min

Test 6: Omega, 99 (44 min), 98 (27 min), 97 (80 min), 96 (123 min), 95 (126 min), 94 (157 min), 93 (520 min).

Average: 172 min

Test 7: CM14, Results tomorrow. Xposed cant be installed on CM14 so didnt use all settings of Greenify. Problems with Phone calling, and the app CNN and Text as battery not working.

Test 8: CM14, Zenrom. Kernel Nemesis. Results day after tomorrow.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] htb2050:
Yeah do cm14.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] systemcrash:
Go ahead and create a CM14 alpha (placeholder) thread with those builds that exist, and the rules for those builds. Then this CM13 thread from [MENTION=3322708]albinoman887[/MENTION] doesn't get mixed up. You have the advantage of a feedback channel for cm14 already, for those crazy enough to run it as daily driver. Less noise to sort through for those who want to keep on top of CM13 things. (Sadly, the people who probably want to do that spam everyone with ETAs and the like. I will happily thread clean those :D )
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] phalkon30:
I agree, there's already been confusion in this thread over who is talking about what, would be nice to keep to 13

Sent from my SM-G900R4 (klteusc) running CM13 9.12.16 with xposed
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] daniel3x:
Anyone notice some more battery draining in the last builds? Before the new fingerprint changes (build 4/10 i think) my phone in deep sleep during the night only drainned 3%, now in the last builds drain 20%. I think i am going back to build 1/10
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] haggertk:
Which kernel?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
If you use latest Boeffla this drain is caused because Boeffla kernel needs an Update to be in line again.

Regards

Gesendet von meinem SM-G900F mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] raenics:
Would be great if you compared Slim6 as well. I'm curious how it stacks up. https://slimroms.org/#/device/klte
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] j1gga84:
Why not opening a separate thread for the tests?

Regards

Gesendet von meinem SM-G900F mit Tapatalk
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] rayzen6:
Yeah it would be much clear and without clutter to cm13 thread. The cm14 ROM is really nice for alphas.

New thread will be awesome.

[MENTION=2693412]haggertk[/MENTION]
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] rayzen6:
Also new build is up from haggertk.

https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=312978532265362578

Sdclang? What's that [MENTION=2693412]haggertk[/MENTION]? Anybody tried yet?
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ScratMan38:
It looks like there is something wrong somewhere. I confirm Boeffla kernel needs to be updated ; but with stock kernel, I often have the phone kept awake 30% to 40% while screen was off, reported by BBS. It never occurred before 10/01 build.
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] daniel3x:
Stock CM kernel

Correctly. This never happen before:
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] f0xy:
CM13 - guys can you just check if you are able to enable the dev settings in camera app, thanks!
[Samsung Galaxy S 5 Unified Development] ikzouhetnietweten:
Yer, I'll make a new thread, is more efficient, so my last post here.

Results CM14: I have to redo this one. I had a call (which didnt work btw), and couldnt install Whatsapp (which has many wakelocks), and cant install xposed on Android 7 so Greenify is limited: 100, 99 (103 min), 98 (120 min), 97 (150 min), 96 (141 min).

Average 128 min.

Will redo today.

Next test: cm-14.0-20161007-UNOFFICIAL-klte.sdclang.zip

Next test: ZenRom (CM14)

Next Test Slim6