yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
#include <std/disclaimer.h>
/*
* Your warranty is now void.
*
* I am not responsible for bricked devices, dead SD cards,
* thermonuclear war, or you getting fired because the alarm app failed.
* YOU are choosing to make these modifications, and if
* you point the finger at me for messing up your device, I will laugh at you. :P
* blah blah blah you get the point.
*/

READ BEFORE POSTING BUGS:

Tutorial: How to properly post a bug

Reporting A Problem - Android

IF YOU POST BUGS WITHOUT READING THESE AND PROVIDING PROPER INFORMATION, DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME POSTING THEM! YOU WILL BE IGNORED! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
KNOWN BUGS:

BT is a little weird (CM Issue)

All Upstream AOSP, CM, and CAF issues

You Tell Me :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Cake Kernel Features:

Linux 3.4.108

O3 and Graphite Optimizations

Lots of Governors

Lots of I/O Schedulers

All the TCP Congestion Control Algorithms Enabled

MSM_MPDECISION by [MENTION=4195844]show-p1984[/MENTION]

MSM_THERMAL by [MENTION=4195844]show-p1984[/MENTION]

Voltage Control by [MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION]

GPU Voltage Control by [MENTION=4325945]ktoonsez[/MENTION]

Configurable Gentle Fair Sleepers by [MENTION=4325945]ktoonsez[/MENTION]

Dynamic File System Readahead

Fast Charge by [MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION]

Ability to Enable and Disable FSYNC by [MENTION=3292224]franciscofranco[/MENTION]

Asyncronous FSYNC by HTC

Ability to Enable and Disable Android Logger by [MENTION=6196453]AlmightyM[/MENTION]egadeth00

KControl Advanced GPU Control Module by [MENTION=4195844]show-p1984[/MENTION]

Export Krait Variant by [MENTION=4195844]show-p1984[/MENTION] (/sys/kernel/debug/krait_variant)

Simple GPU Governor by [MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION]

/dev/frandom Support

Sound Control by [MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION]

CPU Overclocking to 2.2GHz (Don't try to benchmark in AnTuTu)

CPU Underclocking to 192MHz

Conservative KGSL Scaling Policy by [MENTION=591147]Entropy512[/MENTION]

Set Multi Core Power Saving to 2 (Aggressive)

Uses Flo GPU Stack

Kernel Modules Support

Small Tweaks here and there

Cake Kernel Usage Policy in ROMs:

Feel free to use it and/or fork it for usage in other ROMs, just PM me to let me know that you wanna use it and give me credits and a link to your thread. That's all I ask. Thanks!

NOTE: If you are using it, compile it from source, don't just kang my boot.img or I will report you
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Devices Supported:

JFLTEATT

JFLTECAN

JFLTECRI

JFLTECSP

JFLTESPR

JFLTETMO

JFLTEUSC

JFLTEVZW

JFLTEXX

Devices Support Planned (not confirmed, no ETA):

JFLTEDCM
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Test Builds:

THESE MAY NOT ALWAYS BOOT (unlikely) AND THEY MAY NOT ALWAYS BE STABLE! PROCEED WITH CAUTION! TEST BUILDS ARE JFLTETMO or JFLTECAN ONLY!

JFLTETMO Test Builds:

10/01, No Underrun, Reverted Flo GPU Stack

http://fs1.codefi.re/cnexus/javelinanddart/candy5-release.v3.8-20151001-OFFICIAL-jfltetmo.zip

http://fs1.codefi.re/cnexus/javelinanddart/candy5-release.v3.8-20151001-OFFICIAL-jfltetmo.zip.md5sum

9/29, Possibly better LiveDisplay speed, possibly better bluetooth

http://fs1.codefi.re/cnexus/javelinanddart/candy5-release.v3.8-20150929-OFFICIAL-jfltetmo.zip

http://fs1.codefi.re/cnexus/javelinanddart/candy5-release.v3.8-20150929-OFFICIAL-jfltetmo.zip.md5sum

9/27, Flo GPU Stack, boots, pretty stable

http://fs1.codefi.re/cnexus/javelinanddart/candy5-release.v3.8-20150927-OFFICIAL-jfltetmo.zip

http://fs1.codefi.re/cnexus/javelinanddart/candy5-release.v3.8-20150927-OFFICIAL-jfltetmo.zip.md5sum

JFLTECAN Test Builds:

10/01, No Underrun, Reverted Flo GPU Stack

http://fs1.codefi.re/cnexus/javelinanddart/candy5-release.v3.8-20151002-OFFICIAL-jfltecan.zip

http://fs1.codefi.re/cnexus/javelinanddart/candy5-release.v3.8-20151002-OFFICIAL-jfltecan.zip.md5sum
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Reserved 4
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Reserved 5
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Yousvel:
Congrats brother! At least there is hope for my m919. Thanks for keeping the s4 alive!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] beafraid88:
which one can be used with stock GE Lollipop 5.1?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
JFLTETMO was around for a while, just by itself, I had all these variants for a while (few weeks), but I've been too busy to create the mega thread

What are you talking about? This is a CM based ROM, has nothing to do with stock GE.

If you're talking about which one to use with GPE variant, jfltetmo is my best guess.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Yousvel:
None of them. cm is totally different from GPE
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Links are UP!

Builds are a few weeks old, but there's a jfltetmo test build that's pretty stable from yesterday
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Diazz72:
Awesome, tnx man.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] marqobazua:
this rom doesnt work for international i9505? i try to installed on twrp and i get error executing updater binary in zip

ok i found the jfltexx rom thanks
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] cenonmin:
Has anyone reported this? https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=81140

I have tried three lollipop roms so far and they all have problems getting accurate location in Maps when set to high accuracy. I have to manually select between high or device depending on the situation :(

I'm surprised Google has not fixed it.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] gear79:
What exactly are the "weird issues" with BT, I use BT a lot, so before I flash ans set up, I'd like some intel por favor!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Yousvel:
Congratulations for your 1000th thank!

[MENTION=5795145]javelinanddart[/MENTION], I've just given you your 1000th "thank"!

You deserve it brother!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
No problem. My jfltetmo users enjoyed it a lot and I figured other variant people would too

Yeah, there's quite a few download links, it's easy enough to get confused. However OTA should be working so next build shouldn't be an issue

Unfortunetely, I can't really help with upstream AOSP or CM bugs, i'll just put AOSP and CM Upstream bugs in my list. Sorry.

No idea, I don't use bluetooth often enough to know, and not everyone has the stupid issue :(

When in doubt, nandroid and flash

Thanks man!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] vinodr5371@xdaroms.co.in:
where is latest update link for i9505?????
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] mikehorizon:
EAP-SIM support

Does this ROM support EAP-SIM authentication for WiFi? If not, are there any plans to implement it ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] aydinbahadir88:
Latest Build for Galaxy S4 jtltexx please ?!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Jfltexx link maybe? few posts down from the OP. The test builds won't be made for all variants, because I don't have the time and patience to make test builds for all variants. Sorry latest official builds are a few weeks old but it's still a solid build.

IDK, does CM have it? Not entirely sure what EAP-SIM is
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Diazz72:
i9505 is most used S4 variant, so i would suggest to drop down some other device and make for 9505.

LLAP.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Rhoban:
Seems that the CPU is underclocked to 1350 MHz. Is it configured to be battery-friendly by default?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Umm... Jfltexx is GT I9505...

If you can find me the commits, i can pick it. Also I can't fix upstream Google Bugs

Sure!

Lol

I have no idea why that keeps happening, I think it's a blow back from the thermal throttling

I'm not spending time fixing it, it's not worth the time, phone is just as snappy
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Hmm, looks like official CM, best thing is just to try it out and see if it's there

A commit is a code change lol, not "developer language" :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Diazz72:
I know that M8, but what i am trying to say is to drop down jfltetmo ( T-Mobile ) variant for latest build and make one for jfltexx.

jfltetmo is on v3.8, and jfltexx v3.7...so i think it would be better if jfltexx would be primary device as it is most used one.

?LLAP.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Sorry bro, not happening. 1 those are test builds that are a bit buggy. Second, they arent always stable, third, that's the variant I have so if I made jfltexx builds, I couldn't test my own stuff. New otas will be coming this weekend for all variants. Right now the major bug is underrun and some sensors are supposedly broken. I'll find the accusing changes and fix it for the ota. I'm not going to waste my time building test builds for everyone because it would take all day. Instead, wait for the ota this weekend, Unless you like hot pink flashes on your screen, every so often and a broken compass.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] mikehorizon:
I found these, if it helps:

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_i9500/compare/cm-12.0...frapeti:cm-12.0

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/andr...mmit/21b671b3ad065588fc867b252d5214490f41365f
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Diazz72:
Np M8, i thought you do not have any S4 variant.

However your work is deeply appreciated...i have tested almost all rom's for S4, and this one is working the best...for some reason benchmark score is lower, but there is no lag, no freezing...etc.

For example with R.R. or any other ROM on 400DPI when i run chrome it would freeze on sec or two, but with this rom NOP, everything is smooth. :good: :good: :good:

?LLAP.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
My signature says I have TMO S4 I'm pretty sure....

Yeah benchmark is low because I put a LOT of stuff to save battery but also a LOT of work to make it very responsive in day to day use not in benchmarks. I don't use any other ROM so I can't comment on Chrome lagging or freezing.

I'm glad you appreciate the work I put into it.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Hmm, IDK if will apply to Qcom Devices but I might be able to get a test build in a day or two, really busy with school atm
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] mikehorizon:
A test build would be much appreciated. Take your time.

P.S - for info, I'm on a jfltexx.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Rhoban:
On this rom's kernel, do governors apply to all cores or just to the first core?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Depends on the app you're using....
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Yousvel:
[MENTION=5795145]javelinanddart[/MENTION], thanks for your good work.

As I know your phone is m919, which version would you suggest me as a Daily Driver?

Thanks
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Those flags cause build to fail :(

I'm guessing it's already included, however I don't use EAP. IDK how much work it would be for you to try it, so if you do, report back if it works or not. I do remember using EAP

The two test builds should be pretty stable, however I have a new one I have yet to flash, if it boots, it will be the most stable.

EDIT: It boots, link posted in Test Build post
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] mikehorizon:
Sorry I don't follow. The test build for eap sim failed ? If yes, what is there to try and report back?

P.S - Just to be clear, in the connection settings for a WiFi network there should be the SIM option, like here in TW

View attachment 3493485
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Yousvel:
Thanks, I am going to download it now.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
Not there, sorry. EAP build failed, so I can't help you there.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] ISF:
Candy5 ROM YouTube Review​

[YOUTUBE]fwe11EZNZ5w[/YOUTUBE]​
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] jstath1972:
Problem with the over/underclock:crying:. The values over the 1890 MHz and under the 384 MHz are not stick. After every reboot or when i re enter to Kernel app they return to default and sometimes to 1566 MHz at the max frequency:(.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] dtriguero:
Are you selecting to apply at boot after you set what you want in kernel editor

sent from BadAss tinker toy using modded out tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] javelinanddart:
It's possible Bricked Thermal is causing this issue, i will have to look into why, I might have to switch thermal drivers when M comes out to fix this issue
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Sparta507:
Is anyone experiencing a sort of choppy nature of the Bluetooth when playing it through car speakers or headphones? Is there a solution for it? If so what can I do to remedy this (I searched the forum for a solution) I bet it must be a setting under the kernel tweak but what exactly is it, I don't have a clue. Any help please?

Thanks ahead of time!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] lsmrfydgaf:
Does your Pandora or Iheart Radio hang when starting the application? After flashing all seemed well until I connected to car blutooth and started my Pandora app..plays like 3 songs then hangs to the point where I need to restart my phone.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] Sparta507:
Yes! Is there any solution?
[XDA Assist] biglion80:
i need help some info on the blu phones which services will they work on sprint services
[XDA Assist] Calin:
Hi and thank you for using XDA Assist :)

Sorry, but can you explain your problem in a more accurate way in order to assist you.

Thanks

Regards
[XDA Assist] biglion80:
ok sorry bout that i was waning to know if the blu series phones will it work on sprints network or not
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] billykxda:
Yup - not tempered glass, but PET film. It seems that everyone is interested in glass, and in turn, endless amounts of discussion on issues with glass protectors for the N5. I've used PET film a couple of times in the past few weeks of N5 ownership, in between installations of glass protectors. Each time, the PET film was a joy to go back to, for me. I was wondering which brands of film members have tried and what their results were.

For those who are wondering why the hell would anyone even consider using old-school film, here are the Pros/Cons of film protectors as I see them:

Pros:

- Little/no halo: If we were all installing only film protectors on the N5, we would have, by now, settled on a bunch of brands that get really good results for just about everyone. I've seen this evolution happen with a number of new phones. There's no such consensus on glass protectors for the N5.

- Easier install: if you have at least average skills, you are going to get a good, easy and quick install. Don't need to dedicate time to rubbing out edges that are standing up off the screen, and no need to break out the hair dryer.

- Less visible: really hard to tell that there is a protector on the N5.

- Cost: Film is less expensive, but glass has really come down in price as well.

Cons:

- Less protection: Hey, glass is stronger and harder than film, I get that.

- Not as smooth as glass: although film can be very good, glass is just smoother.

In my experience, it's not until I put a film protector on that I say "Damn, that looks great!" Often I can see a glass protector on a phone at a distance. If it's not the halo it's the edges top and bottom just looking like a protector stuck on the display.

So, I am not starting a case for glass vs film, I just would like to know what film you folks have used on the N5. I use Spigen film and the first install had the tiniest amount of halo above the earpiece (I don't think there should be protector in that area), but everything else was spot-on perfect. The second film is spot-on perfect all around. I have another brand in-bound as we speak.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] ky3bmu4:
I bought this 3 and will be able to provide some feedback in ~2 weeks ))

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B014R5DMIU?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B010DB2ROC?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B010MWD59I?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] billykxda:
Cool.

I recall someone here saying that they use that brand with good results.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] billykxda:
Over at Android Central, a number of N5 owners are now discovering the advantages of PET film.

Hey, it all depends on what you want.

I am still rocking the Spigen film. I'd say it looks perfect, but you really have to look closely to see any evidence of a protector. :)
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] ambervals6:
No halo on that one?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] dja2k:
I have the ones from iCarez and they don't cover past the light sensors on top which leaves an exposed area, same goes to the bottom where the home key is, but not as much.

I would also like feedback on the Pleson ones especially if they play well with a TPU Hybrid case.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] yogi217:
Spigen and it's pretty awesome. Can't even tell it's on both by looks and feel.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] billykxda:
No halo on my second install. PET film is far more forgivable b/c it can easily follow the curve on the display edges. That's a major advantage for those of us who want their N5 to look great - as it was designed to do. For me, glass protectors always appear to be less-than-great looking layers of glass stuck on the front of an elegantly-designed N5. So, for now, I am happily rocking a film protector.

I purchased another brand of film protectors, but I am going to hold-off on trying them out. The Spigen is just too perfect to pull-off.

I use a Ringke Slim case that does not interfere with the film at all. I had a more robust Spigen Hybrid case on with the first Spigen film I had installed, and the case would flex inwards occasionally when pressing the power button, lifting it up momentarily, but then it would just lay back down. The Ringke case is particularly good for use with full-size protectors.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] dsmpampis:
Can you please post some photos of your Note with the spigen film? Right now I'm using the Nillkin glass and I'm terribly disappointed! I may consider got back to pet films after many years with glass protector!

Thanks in advance!

Tapatalked with my Note 5
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] billykxda:
I don't have a second phone/camera around to do so. Just tried using my webcam - you don't want to see what that looked like. :)

Just imagine not seeing a protector. And there you have it.

-bk
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] skadude66:
Have you noticed the fingerprint scanner being any slower to unlock the device since installing the Spigen screen protector? I just installed mine last night and maybe I'm crazy.. But it just seems a lite bit slower than when I had no screen protector. Maybe I'm crazy! Lol.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] billykxda:
Nope - haven't noticed that at all. Since the protector doesn't go near where the fingerprint detection is going on, I can't imagine how it could interfere.

There's lots of voodoo that's happening with the fingerprint reader that sometimes makes it perfectly accurate, other times less so. Plus, there are the variables involved when you ask a user to configure/set-up complex hardware. I'd look elsewhere.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] skadude66:
I might have installed mine just a little bit crooked... It EVER so slightly touches the silver ring of the home button, but maybe I'm just crazy and it's not actually affecting anything haha.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] ambervals6:
No b.s spigen, no b.s expensive brand name. 5pack for $1 best screen protector I have got so far. Bestoffer4yu ebay seller from china.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] dixit:
I got the iCarez and it was perfect on my note4 but on the note5 it has about 1mm of halo on both sides. Not as visible as a tempered glass halo but at right angle you can see it. Its sized to exactly the LCD part so can't be cut any smaller.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] vincel892:
Did you do anything special when you put it on the second time ? Just installed the Spigen Crystal for the first time on my N5 and there's a halo at the top, continuing a little bit down the sides :(
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] dsmpampis:
Spigen Crystal

View attachment 3508573View attachment 3508574View attachment 3508579View attachment 3508580View attachment 3508581

Tapatalked with my Note 5
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] Toneman07:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B011PYL8C8?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s01

$6 for six screen protectors - done deal.

I got these first and didn't use them. I was provided a few glass protectors to test. Halo after Halo on the glass, finally I broke these out and opened them. Easy install, no real complaints. I didn't miss the feel of these, but it works with the pen well. Currently have mine, my wife and my moms phone protected with these - and three to spare :highfive:
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] vincel892:
That looks amazing. My first install did not come out that well unfortunately :( any tips ?
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] kotaro_14:
Have you tried the hinge method? Always works for me.

I like the appearance of PET screen protectors, but compared to glass, they scratch pretty easily. On the first day, I had 2 deep scratches just by cleaning the screen with a microfiber. Also, the oleophobic coating can't hold a candle to glass, constantly wiping my screen. I'm using the Spigen Crystal btw. I like how on regular screen protectors, you can reinstall and get rid of dust if it gets stuck under though.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] vincel892:
Hinge method ? What's that? I guess I'll do a quick Google search
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] kotaro_14:
To save everyone's time and install screen protector perfectly and effortlessly http://lifehacker.com/5927704/apply-a-screen-protector-perfectly-every-time-with-the-hinge-method
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] vincel892:
Thanks [emoji1]
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] FrankeyStein:
I wanted to ask, do you feel any different using the S pen with glass versus the PET?

is the drag much noticable?
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] farfromovin:
Hard to go wrong with Spigen Crystal.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] billykxda:
No - didn't do anything special.

I've been applying screen protectors for years, so I am pretty good at it.

There are endless YouTube videos showing the best techniques.

Check 'em out.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] FrankeyStein:
do you feel any different using the S pen with glass versus the PET?

is the drag much noticable?
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] billykxda:
Yes - I think I noted in the OP that glass is the hardest option, therefore it's the smoothest option. But PET is very close, and I can't tell if I have simply adjusted to writing on PET or if the PET film has gotten harder over time, but as of now, I can't say that I feel any resistance at all. But, for the first few minutes of using PET, it feels a bit "softer", but just by a bit.

I got a selection of tempered glass protectors in waiting the wings, but I know that none of them will disappear like the PET does after a well-aligned install. They will chill in the wings for now, 'cause PET looks awesome.
[Galaxy Note5 Accessories] rswatkins:
I used PET and at first there was a light soft feeling but now it don't notice any drag. I scratched mine so I'm going to try the glass protectors and see how those work out.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] mdhensley5:
Are there any custom WM5 ROMs other than Wizard Love? ROMs that I can install without being CID unlocked?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] mestrini:
All ROMs can be flashed with CID locked devices; but you must extract the nk.nbf from the RUU, decrypt it, remove the IPL/SPL chunks, crypt again and pack again in RUU :p
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] mdhensley5:
:p back at ya! Can shelltool be used with WM5 ROMs?
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario Software Upgrading] mestrini:
Yes it can, as well as Wizard Service Tool