yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Kanczyn25:
Is there something to this ROM 966 + fonts.zip?

Wysłane z mojego SM-N910F przy użyciu Tapatalka
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Kanczyn25:
You can litter me some other 3Mint + batterymod because this is not a very good work.

Wysłane z mojego SM-N910F przy użyciu Tapatalka
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tranquillian:
Hi,

firstly thanks so much for this, exactly what I wanted, but I seem to have one problem, the camera app crashes on launch? I imagine the "Gallery" app is somewhat linked to it so could the absence of it be a problem? I can open 3rd party camera apps fine.

I can't seem to find Gallery in your list of bloatware.

Thanks for any help.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
Nope, gallery apk hasn't been removed. Camera should work fine, please try to do a clean install without any mods or other apks installed and see if it works.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tranquillian:
Just did a clean install and same problem with Camera force closing. I'm on correct bootloader and modem, COJ3.

So I wiped in TWRP, flashed stock 5.1.1 COI1/COJ3 firmware in Odin, back to stock.

Then boot back into TWRP, wipe, then flash the Emotion kernel

(http://xdaforums.com/note-4/orig-development/tw-kernel-emotroid-team-t2990557)

And SuperSU.

At this point all is fine, solid, rooted. Then I boot to recovery, wipe data/cache/dalvik etc and flash this ROM.

Then everything works except Camera?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
There was a similar issue on _Alxndr's forum regarding some people who were facing issue with the camera.

The trick was to not format /system, instead just flash the ROM over (Try without super-wipe)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Zionator:
How come kyubi rom thread was closed and not this?

I thought there was something about the rom xda didn't want here ?

Sent from my SM-N666F "Special Edition"
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] tranquillian:
That did the trick! Thanks very much :good::good:
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
This thread is compliant with the XDA rules...
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Zionator:
Ok sorry for asking but what is it that kyubi didn't comply with ?

Some kernel source code?

Sent from my SM-N666F "Special Edition"
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
I don't know what the issue was, that is between the moderator and the OP.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Zionator:
Ok just wired o.0

Sent from my SM-N666F "Special Edition"
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xxaqib:
any patch with Note 5 apps on this ROM ???
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] decebal12345:
Hi.

I installed your rom today, until now I like it.

Do you have another Splanner? Because Splanner from "Download Bloat-ware" link doesn't work.

Thank you.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
What do you mean by 'it doesn't work'?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] decebal12345:
I flash SPlanner.zip, reboot and it doesn't occur.

This can not be... is there now. I can't believe this.

After 4-5 flash... strange, thank you and i'm sorry for the trouble.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
It's okay ;) maybe the file was tired.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xxaqib:
Is there any light debloat version is available? even new app optimization on coj3 is debloated :(
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xxaqib:
[MENTION=5378210]Battlehero[/MENTION] Please provide the VPN debloated settings. as i cant connect to the VPN.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
Did you try and flash this bloat-ware?

https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24052804347848688
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] decebal12345:
After first night with this rom, just 3m 38s Awake in 7h 44m with screen off, so very good until now:

[URL=http://s629.photobucket.com/user/decebal12345/media/Screenshot_2015-11-09-06-50-28-1.png.html][/URL]

With a little problem: too many Wakeup for com.google.android.gsm, 147 in 7h 44m. (18,8/h??????)

[/URL][/IMG]

Do you have any solution for this?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] xxaqib:
thanks man :)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
You could use Greenify, I have the donation package one of the features reveals hidden sync options and I un-tick location reporting. You could also use 'Disable Service' app from Google Playstore to prevent Google Play-services from checking for system updates.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] decebal12345:
Thank you for your response.

I have Greenify too and Amplify. I heard about "Disable Service" app but i never used.

In my previous phone i had this option: Settings > Privacy > Privacy Guard > Advanced (in the menu) > Google Play services. And there I disabled "Wake up" and "Keep awake" (CM rom). Can I find this in your rom?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
You could try something similar with 'AppOps' in the Google Play-store.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Crakz:
Awesome clean rom.

Hello there, cool rom very nice clean and smooth, jus what i was looking for !

But i do not enjoy the benefits of using wanam exposed and so...

Every module i install just doesnt work properly.

The battery... woah it has insane leakage i couldnt find what app kill the battery so fast.. and the charge just takes too long without fast charging , like if i connect to charger itcan take about 3-5 hours till it gets fully charged from 20% batt life...

What could it be can someone rescue me ? Thx alot great work with the rom !
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
Google Play-services Battery drain

The battery drain is most likely Google Play-services:

One solution is to install 'Disable Service' (Available in the Google Playstore) and disable Google Play-service's ability to check for system update and wake-up.

Another Solution is to install AppOps (Available in the Google Playstore) and disable Google Play-services ability to wake-up.

Clearing Google Play-services data might also help
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Xokoz:
My solution is Settings > Data Usage (Not sure if thats the right name) > Click Google Play services > Scroll that page down, you see disable or limit background data. Click it. Works 100% for me.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Crakz:
Doesn't work..

And I've noticed that the battery never gets to 100% when fully charged, it stops at 98%. Any ideas ?

And when im using waze its killing the battery..

Never happened in other roms befor.

Thx for help !
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] gugas123:
can i use this ?

BL_N910FXXU1POI4.tar.md5

CP_N910FXXU1POI4.tar.md5
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] decebal12345:
Good rom:

[/URL][/IMG]
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Battlehero:
That combination is unlikely to work with this ROM, it's advised to match the ROMs base.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] gugas123:
I'll stay with the recommended BL , CP

;) had some surprises im another rom and now I I'll play safe with your recommentation

I've always been a CM guy but this is the 3rd time I flash this rom and I really have to say this is an amazing stable rom.

going to stay around. Speedy and friendly rom with only the essential :)))) just has I like it

thank you and congratulations :)))))
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] gugas123:
Does Layers work with this rom?

Or is there any theme I can use to darken this amazing rom ?

or build prop config to black background ?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] yz999zz:
Great ROM, nice job!

Anyway I found a minor issue, when you are searching for a setting the setting app will crash.

How to reproduce:

- Go to settings

- Tap the search icon (magnifier glass)

- Begin a search starting with A or B letter

- It freezes some seconds then the setting app will crash
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Snapdragon)] Motawa88:
what does the tweaked build prop do?
[Nexus 6P General] EVOme:
Been going back and forth on whether I should have gotten the silver phone. I ordered black. I cannot find many reviews that show a decent picture of the black model like the do the silver and white.
[Nexus 6P General] tietherope:
The MKBHD video showed all three at some point I believe.

https://youtu.be/MQ9GDfE3BZg
[Nexus 6P General] mosincredible:
Very good look at the Graphite in these 2 videos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QY3mMaI1U-E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXnQCgSxpKM
[Nexus 6P General] fatboypup:
You made the right choice #graphitebros
[Nexus 6P General] DxTcmix:
Graphite looks awesome, glad I chose well #graphitebros
[Nexus 6P General] EVOme:
Thanks for those.. I cancelled the black and went silver. Same ship date range..Excellent!!

lol...i switched
[Nexus 6P General] fatboypup:
Was it a 64g? Maybe ours will move up heh
[Nexus 6P General] jaben2:
Had me almost second guessing. Looked again and settled on graphite again.
[Nexus 6P General] EVOme:
Yes

Look again...haha
[Nexus 6P General] WoodroweBones:
http://www.theverge.com/2015/9/29/9412113/hands-on-with-new-nexus-6p

Some good pics of the graphite there.... I myself was on the fence between graphite and aluminum. I eventually went aluminum simply because every other phone i've owned was black. I'm sticking with it but definitely had some second thoughts
[Nexus 6P General] Shaquiel Harris:
My Oneplus and Oneplus 2 are black so I was stuck between the white and silver, went with silver myself because of the shine it has to it. Looks absolutely beautiful in my opinion. Made sure to grab that protect just in case. The wait is unbearable though lol! #silversurfers
[Nexus 6P General] fatboypup:
Silver seemed too iphoneish
[Nexus 6P General] [hfm]:
I never thought I'd say this, but the white one looks damn good.

The only thing I'd be afraid of is that it might show marks and dirt easier.
[Nexus 6P General] chrisjcks:
Check this video - I'm sure it'll relax your mind.

[YOUTUBE]4i53_CbJNOo[/YOUTUBE]
[Nexus 6P General] galaxys:
#SilverSurfer here...ftw
[Nexus 6P General] fatboypup:
Yeah the silver looks horrible
[Nexus 6P General] seezar:
I ordered the graphite and then had second thoughts that I should have gone with silver but I've got a delivery date of Oct 27th so not going to cancel. Plus after seeing more of the graphite I'm becoming glad I went with it.
[Nexus 6P General] prestige2:
Sooo much darkness with my previous phones so I will go with Silver
[Nexus 6P General] boynamedstacy:
Silver looks cheap, especially with the non matching "silver plastic" at the base of the rear. All these people who canceled their graphite will be kicking their selves once they get the silver in person. Just watch
[Nexus 6P General] Red Wolf:
Mostly I buy black phone so I went with graphite hopefully it will be nice. I seen sliver iphone but don't like it much, space gray looks great so I guess graphite will be looking nice. #graphitebros
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nhaixin69:
I know it's late to ask this but i have this phone for quite a while now. Since brand new, i have always noticed that the camera auto focusing has been really really laggy and it gets worse under dimmer conditions. Touch to focus is a tad faster but then its not as great too. I used to have a iPhone 5 and it was a fast snapper and i rarely miss a shot with my active toddler around. With my note 3, most of the time i am missing moments even with him (my tod) being less active!

Is this merely due to software / OS or hardware limitations? Is there anyway to fix this ?

Please advise. :cowboy:
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ithehappy:
Is it happening because of that Smart stabilisation feature? Have you tried to focus with it being turned off?
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nhaixin69:
I have switched that smart stabilisation off. Even played with lower megapixels and different metering modes.

Of course the smart stabilisation off helps pretty much but then it's still quite slow which is kinda frustrating.

So anybody, please advise.
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nhaixin69:
Nobody?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Droidriven:
I have been looking for a lollipop ROM to use on my old Sprint S2 E4GT SPH-D710 that isn't an activated device anymore, I can only find 4.4.4 and under for the D710 and I would rather have LP. I flashed an i9100 C-ROM 4.4.4 on it once and I remember it flashing fine and receiving signal but some things were backwards like screen rotation and hardware/soft keys, when device was straight up the screen would rotate upside down, I don't remember any other issues of any consequence though.

My question is what all do I need to change for the i9100 ROM to work on my D710. All I need it to do is work on WiFi and have Bluetooth function and have the keys function correctly for my device. Can anyone tell me what significant differences there are that I need to edit before flashing so as not to cause issues. I'm surprised my device didn't bootloop with the I9100 or even flash at all, not to mention that it was still seeing the network.

Any advice on what has to be changed to compensate for the slight differences between the devices would be much appreciated, thanks.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Joker1716:
I have flashed three different i9100 lollipop ROMs , and an i9100 liquid marshmallow ROM onto the SPH-D710. None of them worked with WiFi . The Bluetooth does work though. And the camera is upside down. There is also no home button and If the screen sleeps it reboots the system ui. I have been inside and out of both devices ROMs on the d710. To get an i9100 ROM to work on a d710 the way you desire is to build from source either kernel or the whole ROM. I am currently trying that. I have a run on sentence in q and a about it
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] WILMANS2M:
Do you mean that latest galaxy s5 neo sm-g903f might be rooted soon ?

(Exynos5 & Mali T-720)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Benko111:
It seems like many people still haven't understood the purpose of apps like SuperSu and Superuser. They are no exploits and don't gain your root access. What they do is they manage the root access and enable you to select which apps to grant root access, otherwise every single application on your device would have it. They are root managers. So this project won't help you in getting root for your device as long as there's no method (exploit) to gain it.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] phhusson:
Not much activity here, but a lot on my side.

Android 6.0 is now out, with its new SELinux policy, which makes it impossible to update the policy after the boot, and dm-verity becomes mandatory (so no /system change without boot.img)

I'm thus totally retargetting my work:

- I've created https://github.com/phhusson/super-bootimg which will edit boot.img (the complicated part, because it needs A LOT of testing across many devices)

- change sepolicy

- Add su in /sbin/su

- Enable su daemon

With various options to disable dm-verity, encryption, etc. (please note that this is NOT required, since only boot.img is changed)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] sandys1:
dude - you should kickstarter this. SuperSu is pretty much a mandatory install for every rooted device. this is big for the XDA community and we would love to support you.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] banderos101:
Cannot express enough how much i want this project to succeed

And, at least for myself

"I also wonder about displaying an user-understandable SELinux policy, so that root applications can be "more secure

Would anyone be interested in such a feature?"

......Hell yeah, that most certainly does interest me.........controllable levels of su right?

Obviously, if its possible to do........even if android denies this possibility, an open source su is most assuredly welcome from this neck of the woods

I wish this project major luck

Edit

"(I'm thinking that I'm trying to be even more secure than "standard" non-rooted ROMs, that's perhaps a bit optimistic.)"

I love that mentality, and im enjoying immensley your discussions on github with lbdroid........i love that your taking security more seriously then most...love where your coming from on this.....major props
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] kennylam:
To better test on shell of recovery without making an update.zip , I modified the sepolicy-inject.c so that the usage() no longer blocks the "booting.sh"

on sepolicy-inject.c:377, insert a line "if ( NULL == optarg ) break;", as in my shell there will be a parameter value with null on last entry of "char** arguv", which will trigger the default switching case and exit the sepolicy-inject unexpectedly.

......

while ((ch = getopt_long(argc, argv, "a:f:g:s:t:c:p:P:o:Z:z:n", long_options, NULL)) != -1) {

if ( NULL == optarg ) break;

switch (ch) {

......
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] phhusson:
I'm not sure I understand...

When calling what command do you need this?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] zameer_yus:
my question is how to change a file label to u: object_r:system_file:s0

i modify system.img to add some additional apps into /system/app/ directory i did modification then build a new system.img after flashing phone with new system.img the app was appear in menu but once i am trying to open it gives me error (com.xxxxxx.andriod) stopped working then i execute ls -Z command in /system/app/ directory to see the different and i realize that the new app i copied in system/app/ directory it has a different label than others

so i tried to change .apk file label to (u: object_r:system_file:s0) using chcon command but failed

chcon: Could not label u: object_r:system_file:s0

can you please guide me how to do it ?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] phhusson:
Can you check in audit log?

How did you put the file?

Don't you have any other message?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] nicholseric:
Maybe in your intro you can eloborate on the naming convention of your bot built .img’s?

one which has su permissive (power?), meaning it can do anything, which is not as safe as source-based s solution (user?), and one which is WIP (eng?)

Your HTTPS link to superuser.phh.me is refusing connections?:

This webpage is not available

ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED

ReloadHide details

Google Chrome's connection attempt to superuser.phh.me was rejected. The website may be down, or your network may not be properly configured.

Check your Internet connection

Check any cables and reboot any routers, modems, or other network devices you may be using.

Allow Chrome to access the network in your firewall or antivirus settings.

If it is already listed as a program allowed to access the network, try removing it from the list and adding it again.

If you use a proxy server...

Check your proxy settings or contact your network administrator to make sure the proxy server is working.

If I do a flash-all.sh of mra58r, reboot to bootloader, fastboot flash boot your-boot.img, would you expect this to boot fine?

Can you detail which phones can take a custom keystore?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] phhusson:
For https, I know it is a must, but i'm waiting for let's encrypt.

For naming convention, I have to rethink those, and i'll update first post.

Anyway it's user < power < eng.

User has only safe permissions, power has all known permissions, eng is permissive. There is nothing source based.

For custom keystore, at the moment I have only seen CAF 5.1/6.0 bootloader with verity enabled to work, and it doesn't display key ID, so it is useless everywhere.

I should get a hand on a Nexus 5X soon, to test properly and get screenshots if it works as advertised.

For your last question, yes. I always work with factory image's partitions, and only change boot.img

I welcome any suggestion about naming convention.
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] nicholseric:
Some times I dont know where to post, here or the Nexus 6 doitright thread. Anyway, I found this interesting.

http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/ABS Lollipop MR1 Verified Boot.pdf

"• We relax some security policies in eng/userdebug loaders to make life less annoying for development • Persistent Data Block ignored, device always unlockable"

If this is true of the boot.img's you build, the only one we could trust is user or are they talking bootloader? Maybe the factory bootloader (user) that google is distributing does not have the verification functionality? Is the bootloader AOSP? If so, what would prevent someone from creating a bootloader, boot.img and /system that circumvents all the verification?
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] nicholseric:
I used your bot built mra58r.

Unfortunately, if forced encryption is on, local.prop does not get parsed and I dont get my custom LCD. This means unless you offer variants of the auto built boot.img with forced encryption off or the ability to pass a noencrypt parameter to the update.zip or build.sh for modifying fstab, I will be forced to modify source and build myself. As for mount -o bind /data/local/tmp/hosts /system/etc, as long as the custom hosts has chcon u:object_r:system_file:s0, things work great.

I still like idea of having the ability to establish a trust between boot.img and a config file in /data/ that do things like custom hosts file, lcd density, iptables (one of my favorites: iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 53 -j DNAT --to 8.8.8.8:53; iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j DNAT --to 8.8.8.8:53)
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] phhusson:
They are talking about the bootloader, but as it is built in the Android build system, they are using Android build system flags.

I know the Nexus 6/9 doesn't have this functionnality. I'm waiting to get a Nexus 5X in my hands to say for 5X/6P.

Either way, we can't circumvent the verification, all we can do is have a YELLOW state instead of ORANGE, which displays the fingerprint of the keystore.

I forgot this presentation from Intel, so I thought I'd give it a try on Nexus Player. Intel has a proper implementation of the bootloader of Google's recommendation, it sounds logical the Nexus Player would implement it.

Oh wait. Google's logic striked again. No they didn't implement it on Nexus Player.

There is no AOSP bootloader... Or there are three (there are two LK and one u-boot), but neither of them are supported, and neither of them support the different verified boot states.

CAF bootloader handles the four states, but doesn't display them. Thanks to you I checked Intel reference bootloader, and it DOES implement the full spec \o/. Though I have no device to test. But basically, there is no opensource arm bootloader implementing it, and that makes me rant a lot against Google.

Two sides:

1. For LCD density, have you tried just doing adb shell wm density? Possibly it doesn't even break SafeNet

2. My plan on the matter is to keep my current builds as is, but add a configuration file, and when I'll make an update.zip, the user will be able to change the config file directly in the update.zip

Well for iptables, I put it in standard su permission. Well ATM because of some bugs it's only in "power", but I expect it to get into "user" when a bug concerning pts is fixed.