yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[T-Mobile LG G3] Ragnar:
Just wanted to clarify what the differences are between android and original development. Here are some KEY points by our very own pulser_g2.

The following are most likely “Original Development”:

*Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them

*Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.

*A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.

*Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.

*ROMs where the developer has made a custom kernel for it.

*Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.

*Significant port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s winzipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)

The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:

*Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favorite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.

*Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.

*Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.

*Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “addon pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.

*A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly unachievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.

*A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (ie. Themed ROM)

You can find all the info for it here. Threads will be moved if they do not meet the "Original" development requirements. Thank you guys and have fun!

NOTE: IF YOU ARE UNSURE WHETHER OR NOT YOUR WORK QUALIFIES FOR OD THEN POST IN ANDROID DEVELOPMENT AND CONTACT A MODERATOR TO REVIEW IT. THANKS!
[T-Mobile LG G2] Ragnar:
Just wanted to clarify what the differences are between android and original development. Here are some KEY points by our very own pulser_g2.

The following are most likely “Original Development”:

*Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them

*Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.

*A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.

*Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.

*ROMs where the developer has made a custom kernel for it.

*Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.

*

Significant

port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s win-zipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)

The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:

*Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favorite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.

*Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.

*Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.

*Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “add-on pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.

*A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly un-achievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.

*A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (i.e. Themed ROM)

You can find all the info for it here. Threads will be moved if they do not meet the "Original" development requirements. Thank you guys and have fun!

NOTE: IF YOU ARE UNSURE WHETHER OR NOT YOUR WORK QUALIFIES FOR OD THEN POST IN ANDROID DEVELOPMENT AND CONTACT A MODERATOR TO REVIEW IT. THANKS!
[Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2, 10.1, 8.4 Q&A, Help & Trouble] me7710:
Hi there,

I can't find Kids Mode on my Tab Pro 12.2. How can I install this? Thank you
[Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2, 10.1, 8.4 Q&A, Help & Trouble] Adso3000:
It's a built-in system app so you'll find it in your app drawer, at least on Lollipop. I think it was there on KitKat but never used it so I don't remember. If it's not there then it sounds like you're running a non-stock rom or one that has at least some Samsung apps removed. If you're running a stock or stock based rom the following might work for you so I've made a backup in Titanium (app+data which is the only sharing option) so try and download it, put it in your Titanium backup folder and restore it. Make sure in Titanium preferences to check the bottom placed "Auto-integrate sys Dalvik into ROM" option.

Haven't tried this or sharing any such thing before but I'd like to help if I can. Let me know if it works.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_rFReIDujLHY1liR0Z6ZWRaV2M/view?ts=56086561
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] TonyStark R.I.P.:
✤ Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769 ✤​

Hello and welcome.​

≡Threads of importance≡​

[START HERE] Frequently Asked Questions. Everything, you must know about L9 by cmahendra

[Guide]Unlock Bootloader for Noobs P769 by carloswii5

[COLLECTIONS]CostumRom and Recovery by Nasheich Xfiles

[GUIDE] Unlock bootloader, flash recovery and root ALL-IN-ONE by markolino631

[DISCUSSION] The Official JellyBean Discussion Thread by eagleeyetom

V20E JB]Collection of NANDROID (CWM) BACKUPS for all Rooted L9 Variants by cmahendra

[GUIDE] [UNBRICK][ROOT] FLASH Any LG L9 Factory ROM (kdz) WITH OFFLINE FIX by cmahendra

[INFOBANK] Collection of LG L9 FACTORY KDZ ROMS, ROOT, BB, BL, SOURCES, etc. by cmahendra

[GUIDE][P768]All in 1 Guide for Custom Firmware + Custom Recovery + Rooting. by donk165

[GUIDE] [MetroPCS] LG Optimus L9 Unlocking Bootloader + CyanogenMod 11 SIMPLIFIED by CygnusBlack

[TUTORIAL][GUIDE] Get Apps to SD Card L9 by aaron2z

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> •ᴥ• <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Please keep the following in mind, for this section:

This thread is no place to ask questions - Please post in a relevant threads​
[Lenovo A7000 Guides, News, & Discussion] Virtualy_Richie:
Donwload & How To Link : Click Here

Video Overview : Click Here
[Lenovo A7000 Guides, News, & Discussion] yadavml:
Nice Rom..

Thanks for sharing the ROM.. Its really good ROM but some features is not working.. like Positioning, Truecaller and also screen Rotation also having problem... rest all very cool...

Thanks... :)
[Moto 360] Ozark_8125:
Somewhere along the way, I've lost the ability to pull up the remote shutter app on the watch. Anyone else have it? I don't remember what ROM I was running, either a stock rooted or aosp rom on my LG G3. When setting the watch up at first, I did see that Remote Shutter showed as installed.
[Moto 360] cammel:
I'm having a similar problem...

Few days ago I was showing a friend of mine who never seen a smartwatch before what the moto 360 can do, after a few minutes when I opened my moto x 2014 camera just to show him the remote shutter it never showed up.... I tried everything but the option to take the picture with my moto 360 never appeared again.

I even restored the moto 360 and also my moto x to factory settings to start fresh but it didn't work. There's no way I can see that damn remote shutter again on my moto 360...

Anyone knows what happened or have had a similar problem??

Thanks in advance!
[Moto 360] kedar18:
Remote shutter works with Google Camera. If you install Google Camera on Phone, wear gets the Remote Shutter app installed too. When you launch Google Camera, you will see the notification on Moto 360, telling that you can use Remote Shutter now.
[HTC Butterfly S] danghuynh2001:
cpu overclock auto restore to default

Im currently using GP's kernel 1.2.4 but when i oc cpu to 2.1ghz auto restore to 1,13ghz and the gpu oc is stuck at 320mhz it cant oc. Help me !

P/s : sorry for my english
[HTC Butterfly S] Singularitas:
What program for overclocking do you use?
[HTC Butterfly S] foggydew88:
You don't need any software, just add the following lines to one of your init.d scripts

echo 585000000 > /sys/devices/platform/kgsl-3d0.0/kgsl/kgsl-3d0/max_gpuclk;
chmod 444 /sys/devices/platform/kgsl-3d0.0/kgsl/kgsl-3d0/max_gpuclk;

for max performances.

Reference to CPU OverClock install 1.2.5, I removed HTC Perflock, set the values with SetCPU, they will be kept.

Slán!
[HTC Butterfly S] Singularitas:
Hi, I'm also using your kernel 1.2.5 and Trickster Mod app to control it and I'm also face similar problem. The GPU OC is not stable, after every reboot it changes to 320 or 409. I do not want to set GPU to max freq all the time, I want to have an option to change it other way that editing init.d script every time. Is there any way you'll be so kind to come up with any other solution?
[HTC Butterfly S] foggydew88:
Any solution work in the same mode, they change that /sys value.

But if you use the "ondemand" governor it will change your current GPU clock frequency as your system need in that moment, you can set the max frequency and your phone will not always use it.
[Galaxy S6 General] kukuthejak:
Guys,

I just received an OTA update on my GS6 G902I (India). The update is about 234 MB. It says its mostly bug fixes etc. I just flashed the update, there is no noticable diff, except there is more bloatware installed in my phone viz Sgear app, and MS office apps. I checked the camera there is no RAW support still; but Live Broadcast is here :). I hope the battery life improves after this update.

I am attaching a screenshot here. I dont know how to mirror the update, if anyone knows , pls guide me i will be happy to share it.

Thanks.
[Galaxy S6 General] kalpesh6331:
Yep, received same update today

Disabled newly installed apps

I don't think this resolves the ram hogging issue.
[Galaxy S6 General] kukuthejak:
It doesnt exactly fix the Ram mgmt issues. I did a test by opening lot of apps letting them run in the background for about 10 mins. When i started opening each app one by one, apps had to refresh themselves esp FB and You Tube.

Next test is the battery life.

But i must point out, inspite of the low free Ram, the phone is still snappy and there is no lag.
[Galaxy S6 General] kalpesh6331:
True that, havent experienced any lag till now :)
[Lenovo A7000 Questions & Answers] Evilix:
If we can lower the DPI a little bit that would be awesome

anyone knows how , or what's the safe DPI Range ? :confused:
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] limpfalife:
Hi I was wondering if there was a program or cab file that would disable the keyboard light from ever turning on. The light is unnecessary for me and I would like to turn it off. Also I would like to know if there is a program that would apply a progress bar when you are sending files through bluetooth. Thanks in advance.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] komodor86:
why you don't swith on the option, that the keybord light ist controled by the lightsensor? then your keybord light only goes on when it's dark outside.....
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] limpfalife:
I dont want the keyboard light to turn on. Even when im outside. I hate when it turns on when i dont want to waisting battery.
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam Software Upgradin] galaxys:
I beleave this registry change will do it for you (dword 0 is off & 1 is on):

This value is responsible for turning Keyboard Led on/off in general:

HKCU\ControlPanel\Backlight\"QKeyLedOnOff"=dword:00000000
[Sprint LG G2] Ragnar:
Just wanted to clarify what the differences are between android and original development. Here are some KEY points by our very own pulser_g2.

The following are most likely “Original Development”:

*Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them

*Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.

*A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.

*Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.

*ROMs where the developer has made a custom kernel for it.

*Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.

*Significant port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s winzipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)

The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:

*Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favorite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.

*Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.

*Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.

*Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “addon pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.

*A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly unachievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.

*A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (ie. Themed ROM)

You can find all the info for it here. Threads will be moved if they do not meet the "Original" development requirements. Thank you guys and have fun!

NOTE: IF YOU ARE UNSURE WHETHER OR NOT YOUR WORK QUALIFIES FOR OD THEN POST IN ANDROID DEVELOPMENT AND CONTACT A MODERATOR TO REVIEW IT. THANKS!
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] wedmiston:
[IMG="spots"][/IMG]

[IMG="more"][/IMG]

Is there any way to fix this? Almost 50% of the screen is dead.
[Xperia Z2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fifthelement89:
Friends.

My sony Z2 might have a problem on one of the IC power management.

So the problem is, while the phone is completely dead, i plug it to the wall charger and it charges till just 1% and then it stops. Nothing happens.. BUT, I'm able to charge it with through the magnetic port.

The other problem is, i connect it to the computer and literally nothing happens. It's like if the usb port is dead.

I already changed the usb port with a new one. Now I'm thinking about one of the IC power chips.

Now, wich one is responsible for the connection to the computer and the charging process through the usb port?

Qualcomm PM8841. Qualcomm PM 8941.

Or is it another one?

Thanks
[Xperia Z2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pcarew:
I realize this was 2 years ago.......

....But did you ever figure this out?

I have a similar problem with a Z1s. The magnetic charger was inadvertantly inverted and fried something (i'm assuming it is either the 8841 or the 8941)

Now the device only charges to about 1%

I'm toying with replacing them both.

Paul.
[Optimus One, P500 Original Android Development] Ragnar:
Just wanted to clarify what the differences are between android and original development. Here are some KEY points by our very own pulser_g2.

The following are most likely “Original Development”:

*Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them

*Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.

*A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.

*Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.

*ROMs where the developer has made a custom kernel for it.

*Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.

*Significant port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s winzipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)

The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:

*Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favorite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.

*Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.

*Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.

*Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “addon pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.

*A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly unachievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.

*A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (ie. Themed ROM)

You can find all the info for it here. Threads will be moved if they do not meet the "Original" development requirements. Thank you guys and have fun!

NOTE: IF YOU ARE UNSURE WHETHER OR NOT YOUR WORK QUALIFIES FOR OD THEN POST IN ANDROID DEVELOPMENT AND CONTACT A MODERATOR TO REVIEW IT. THANKS!
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] sasuke12096:
Boot problem

Hey guys

Since today I have this problem:

youtube/watch?v=CVQnRhazofk

I can still unlock it and use everything till it reboots.

Infos:

Android Version: 4.4.2

Kernel Version: 3.4.0-gac9222c

android-build@vpbs1.mtv.corp.google.com #1

Wed Nov 20 14:50:44 PST 2013

Build Number: KOT49H

That's all I could find about my device.

I hope someone can help me fix this problem.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] elonus:
Is your bootloader unlocked? Have you rooted? Installed a custom Rom? Kernel? Recovery?
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] sasuke12096:
What do you mean by bootloader unlocked? I didn't change anything. So no custom rom , not rooted etc.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] elbenny:
I have the same problem, running 4.4.4 (KTU84P)

I'm rooted with Xposed + GravityBox, Xprivacy, and a couple others, but disabling Xposed didn't seem to help at all.

---------- Post added at 07:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:48 PM ----------

I flashed stock system.img and that didn't help either, so I can't blame root or Xposed.

Some googling found a few references to others with similar problems. One post mentioned quickly unlocking and disabling wifi (+ mobile data if you have it) stops the boot loops, and I was able to reproduce that. Unfortunately, a tablet with no internet access isn't very useful.

I've since tried flashing latest 5.1.1 (LMY48P) which did not boot loop. Maybe I will finally suck it up and move to Lollipop.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] sasuke12096:
turning out the wifi really helped. It stopped to reboot but it's not really useful without internet :(
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] elbenny:
Looks like I spoke too soon. 5.1.1 bootloops (earlier, though) if I restore my /data from 4.4.4 nandroid.

---------- Post added at 08:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:33 PM ----------

I agree, no wifi is pretty pointless and hopefully Google will come up with a proper fix.

I'd post the link but I can't yet, anyway you can search "Google product forums" for a thread called "Unable to start up nexus 7"

Maybe you can chime in over there too
[Galaxy S 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zetsui:
WTF. How can this phone not have an AOSP rom? How does locked bootloader automatically mean no independent dev?