yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note5] bobturismo:
Plugged my phone into a 2.0 charger from either b my s4 mini or my n3 before going to bed, woke up and phone wasnt fully charged. Didn't think anything of it, just went on my way. Now my phone just died completely went to use that same charger and didn't charge.

Downloaded a galaxy battery current charging app and it shows negative amperage when plugged into 2a charger. Also with the screen off it only shows one green dot instead of the trail leading to the battery.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note5] jbadboy2007:
Sounds like your 2 amp cable was defective. I've plugged mine into a 2 amp and it just takes a lot longer to charge
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note5] bobturismo:
I thought so too, so I used the brand new cable that came with the n5, same result.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note5] jbadboy2007:
If the other cable was defective it could of damaged your usb port possibly. I use a 2 amp in my car sometimes then my 5 amp at home no ill effects
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note5] juvenile43:
I use my note 3 charger every night because ive always heard a slower charge is better for battery longevity. I have had absolutely no problems and wake up with a full charge after a average 5 hour sleep every morning. I only use my note 5 charger for quick fill ups during the day. Im guessing your wall wart is bad. Try the 2amp cable on the note 5 charger then U will know its not the cable
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note5] ctrl-z:
Same, no problems with the 2 amp here.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Abood shaal:
Hi guys i have a note 4 running on android 5.1.1 and I tried to root it with custom kernel the googy max kernel rooted my phone but when every time I reboot my device all my WiFi networks on my phone get forget I hope u give me solution :)

My note 4 model number is (SM-N910H) (EXYNOS)
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] micmars:
You may want to try the steps outlined in this post from that thread...

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=62723863&postcount=1198

Please let us know if this fixes your issue.

Good luck!

#WhiteUIsMustDie, #EndDarkAppOppression
[General Questions and Answers] Gazktis EDS Up:
Hi everybody.... I need help... I've made an bad manipulation by editing build.prop (bad idea) and i'm stucking in a bootloop.... I have no custom recovery... Juste the android systeme recovery so i cannot wipe dalvik cache.... I cannot backup and restore.... My devices is an alcatel one touch pop c1 (Pixi 2) already rooted.... Please i need help..... Pliz pliz pliz!!! :crying:
[XDA Assist] CaptLevi:
Hey Guys! So here's my problem today... You see my friend wanted a new ROM for his galaxy Y. And I, being a geek; accepted. Now when I flashed CWM, it worked fine at first but when I tried to reboot it at the CWM menu it says "Root access is missing. Root device. THIS CANNOT BE UNDONE." and there are 2 options either "-No" or "Yes - Root device (/system/xbin.".. Now, no matter what I choose it still wont boot up completely and open CWM. How do I fix this??? I don't want to ruin my friends new phone!! HELP!
[XDA Assist] CaptLevi:
It's title is "CWM-based recovery V6.0.5.3"
[XDA Assist] Ragnar:
Thank you for using XDA Assist.

You should be asking your question in the device specific forum or in the forum for the Rom you are using. In most Development sections of each device specific forum you will find a thread on recoveries you can also ask in there or in the Q&A section for the device.

XDA Assist is here to guide you and point you in the direction you need to go.

We do not provide solutions or guides. We are a Developers site for Developers. Users are required to search and research their information. Please make sure you read everything and truly understand it before attempting to alter your very expensive device, in this case your friends.

Thank you and good luck

Ragnar

P.S. I will tell you that you should have selected NO when it first asked you if the device was already rooted, which it must have been since you installed custom recovery.
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] T_L_O_T_D:
after dirty flash pre rooted .368 zip on 6903 incoming calls are just vibrate not ringing. any solution?
[Xperia Z1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xasbo:
Do a clean flash.
[Moto G 2015 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] theShadow800:
If someone can then please port Paranoid Android 5 to this device.

Thanks a lot
[Moto G 2015 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] christopherrrg:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=62533350

[Unofficial] Paranoid-L 5.1 osprey

Is this that?
[Moto G 2015 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] theShadow800:
No, actually that one lags a lot, so i was wondering if someone could make a new buiild. I did talk to the developer of that build but he was having some issues now.
[General Questions and Answers] joikep:
Hello and greetings!

I have an HTC One M8 unrooted and with bootloader locked S-ON with Telcel carrier here in Mexico. The unlocking bootloader and rooting process is no problem, the issue is that I have been reading through posts and forums about custom ROMS and want to install ViperROM or SkyDragon both with Sense 7, but it clearly states that I have to upgrade my firmware, the only problem is that my modleid matched, but my CID is 332 (for latam) and I haven't found any upgrades for that firmware exclusively. I've gone through tons of posts, and forums in English and Spanish to no avail. Any help in pointing me to the right direction would be appreciated.:)
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tinkerer_:
Anybody have anything to offer regarding the audio (headphone output) of the 2015 Moto X Pure Edition (Style)?

I cannot find any detailed reviews or comparisons.

It seems that audio is handled by the Snapdragon 808, but I can't find concrete details of this area of this phone.

I ordered a MXPE seeking better quality audio than the Kyocera Hydro Wave (I know, I know...), but now I'm reading that some other phones have better audio quality using dedicated DACs from audiophile-name companies.

TIA...
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cc999:
Audio

I can tell you this, vs. the Samsung Galaxy S6 I owned for 4 months the Moto X Pure 2015 is much better.

Exact same songs and player used on both. The output is louder also when I am sending via bluetooth in my car.

The sound overall seems richer with the exact same settings. This is based on Bose QC headset, streaming wirlessly to a Klipsh speaker, or streaming in my car.

CC
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] randp1:
Sound on this phone is awesome!
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] patt2k:
Put viper4android on it :)
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] daryllh:
I turned the moto audio enhancing off. My opinion is that the mids are really punchy. The lows mids are there but can get lost depending on type of music.

Highs seem to be the worst. Cymbals can be overpowering. Heavier music suffers most from this. It's probably a combination of how the phone handles loud music (mastered loud).

Overall I like the speakers and the audio experience that 'my phone' gives me. I came from Oneplus One, Note 4, Original Moto X.

Moto phones have the loudest speakers I have experienced in a phone.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Locklear308:
How did you turn of the Moto Audio?
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bizill:
Sounds pretty good. I'm not much into reviewing and A/B'ing and using descriptive words, but to my ears they sound pretty good. Though normally I'll be using mine with an AMP/DAC and mine in particular is the FiiO E18.

I just did a quick 5 minute A/B for you even though 5 minutes will not reveal true differences well enough. I placed my Moto Pure up against my Note 2 (I'm not sure if the T-Mo Note 2 had the Wolfson chip as did the international or not) using Poweramp and defeated the EQ on both phones.

They both are loud and handle my Philips Fidelio X2's well, which are easy to drive cans. I left the FiiO out of the loop. TO ME, both phones had decent bass reproduction and trebles sounded clear but the Moto did SEEM to sound more airy. There seemed to be a bit of a "veil" over the sound of the Note 2, but to my surprise, I preferred it. Mind you, this difference is not large at all and again, 5 minutes isn't enough time to compare, but it is what it is.

So, if I were to use one purely for the headphone only output, I'd probably reach for my Note 2, but I would have ZERO issue getting great sound out of the Moto. Listening output is very subjective. What sounds good to me may not sound as well to you. Also, our minds need proper adjustment to the different sounds so as time rolled on I might just prefer the Moto Pure. And as always, YMMV.

ETA: Forgot to mention this was using a flac file and not just an MP3.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gpz1100:
What about audio quality through the earpiece during a call?

Is it loud, clear? Can it be set too loud? Many smartphones ear piece audio is poor, especially in loud environments.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] daryllh:
Who uses their phone as a phone?! Lol

---------- Post added at 07:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 PM ----------

It's an option in the sound and notification setting. It opens up the eq section.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gpz1100:
Sorry, I was born in the last century where we still communicated verbally ;)
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] daryllh:
I was born 40 years ago. I got sick of talking to people about 6 years ago.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Locklear308:
Ohhh I already set the EQ to all normal across the ranges, I guess that is what you mean?
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tony1208:
Speakers are loud...louder than my OnePlus so that's loud lol..
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dahenjo:
I can barely remember having only radio until we got our first B&W TV in 1953. It was a huge deal going from a party line to our very own telephone line around 1955. I watched Sputnik going over at age 7, along with every other person in my town (many thousands). My first device was a **** Tracy wristwatch, circa 1959. So I'd have to say the audio quality of my Moto XPE is pretty darned good! :laugh:
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Locklear308:
The OPO sounds like a blown speaker. The Moto X PE has FANTASTIC speakers. Better than I thought possible, this is the GOLDEN standard.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tinkerer_:
Chiming in on my original question, now that I have the phone.

Headphone audio is MUCH better quality than the Kyocera Hydro Wave. (As might be expected.) MUCH more clean power, better clarity, less distortion.

I did not do any kind of exhaustive AxB or technical analysis, just a subjective listen.

If anyone has further info, especially technical/test data or controlled (blind AxB listening tests, etc.), this would also be cool to see. But I'm very happy with it. :)

Thanks...
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bisu007:
Compared to the HTC One M8, how does the quality of speakers and headphones? I'm thinking about replacing my HTC and I really like the new Motorola.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dnbonds:
From what I remember from my m8, which I haven't used for 7 months, it sounds just about the same. I do think the volume on my moto x sounds louder. I almost never have anything playing full volume through the speakers due to that. Haven't had any distortions either.

Haven't tested the headphone jack other than in my car once because my bluetooth got a little messed up. Definitely sounded better than my note 4 on both aux and bluetooth.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tristan_2468:
Compared to the Nexus 6, sound through headphones is much richer. I also disable the EQ.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tinkerer_:
Note that to get the best sound quality, the Audio Effects must be completely turned OFF (disabled completely), not just set to "normal EQ" or "EQ off" or whatever with Audio Effects still on (enabled).

I have to wonder what sort of wooden-ears Motorola manager approved releasing this phone with Audio Effects enabled by default. It significantly degrades audio quality.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gpz1100:
Can folks post some feedback on in call audio quality - both ear piece and speakerphone?
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ominousnimbus:
To my ears, using decent earbuds, the 3.5mm audio maxes out slightly quieter and is slightly quicker to distort at high volumes than the AT&T Galaxy S3 (SGH-i747) I came from. Not a dealbreaker, as I'm sure you can do far, far worse with some other devices in this price range.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tinkerer_:
Significantly better than the phone it replaced (Kyocera Hydro Wave).

The Wave did a poor job with both speakerphone and normal voice phone mode, apparently related to managing background noise vs. speaking input to microphone. It would break up a lot. The Wave built-in speaker was lower quality, and its amplification hardware also weaker thus driven harder thus more distorted.

On all these points, the XT1575 is MUCH better. I'm quite happy with phone calls audio performance of the XT1575.

Interestingly, the XT1575 does not do the "HD" call protocol of T-Mobile, yet still sounds and performs better on voice calls than the Wave which does it. Goes to show the importance of good hardware and basic HW/SW integration.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Corduroy-21:
To be honest I'm not delighted. I come from an HTC One M7 and I find it superior in all audio terms.

Call audio quality is decent but the volume is kind of low and when you increase it to maximum it starts to have some distortion.

Have in mind that this may be only in my phone, however I've seen the same in my Moto G 2014.

Haven't tested ear pieces yet.

Speakers for music etc are pretty good and loud, not like Boomsound, but I believe better than most other phones.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] max1001:
This phone isn't for people that like to listen to hifi music. NO 192kb 24ghz decode that must flagship and even mid-range phone have these day.

But you can't really tell the difference unless you have flac and a decent pair of cans.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tinkerer_:
Can you provide references for relevant HW specifications, XT1575 vs. others that support 192/24 ?

I don't see anything published by Motorola on the XT1575 HW audio bitrate/depth capabilities.

HW-wise, it appears likely that the Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 handles audio processing using the Hexagon V56 DSP. This looks like the same Hexagon V56 DSP used in the Snapdragon 810. Can't find many specifics on the Qualcomm site itself about audio capabilities of the Hexagon V56 DSP, but Qualcomm press release for the Snapdragon 810 says "...up to 24-bit/192kHz music playback using our Qualcomm® Hexagon™ V56 DSP " (See http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...ier-mobile-experiences-of-2015-300028823.html , other sources also.)

So it appears that the XT1575, using the 808 with Hexagon V56 DSP, may in fact be capable of 24-bit/192kHz audio in HW. Can't find anything really confirming this though. If DAC is handled outside of the 808, that would be the limiting factor too.

Other info?
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] max1001:
DSP alone doesn't make it so that you can play 24 bit/192 khz. I chatted with Moto support and they told me it doesn't have support 24 bit/ 192 khz. Also, I actually have 24 bit/192 khz flac that MXPE can't play which is why I called support.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tinkerer_:
Good information, but...

Moto Support is not exactly known for always providing correct information.

You should be able to play 24/192 FLAC using Neutron or other app, regardless of HW. The app will downsample to 16/44.1 so any phone can play the 24/192 FLAC.

As noted, if the XT1575 uses a DAC outside of the 808, the DAC is the limiting factor regardless of the DSP in the 808.

Can anyone offer info on XT2575 audio HW including DAC, other than "Moto Support told me ___"?

TIA...
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zeroibis:
A lot of flac is only 16bit.

Also to understand why 24bit decoding is not going to matter (especially on a phone) see: http://www.head-fi.org/t/415361/24bit-vs-16bit-the-myth-exploded

If your listening to something that actually has a true 24bit depth and you care enough to hear it your going to want and need a dedicated dac that likely costs much more than the phone itself.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] max1001:
You can play it using a player that can do software decode but you are going to lose quality. In any case, MXPE is a step down from the OPO but I don't think most people can't tell the difference.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tinkerer_:
Hmmm...this thread is veering toward the debate about 24/192 vs. 16/44.1 audio. I can't say I've heard apples-to-apples comparisons enabling me to take sides. There is some merit to observations by some, that to fairly compare subjective quality of 24/192 to 16/44.1 requires double-blind ABX test using 100% identical chain starting from masters all the way through hw/sw to transducers, except for bit rate/depth, and I do not have access to such. (I have listened to 24/192 DVD Audio on a good audiophile stereo [AVA amp, NAD preamp, Infinite Slope speakers], but I have no idea of the difference in source material masters or HW/FW in the player I used, vs. the CD/player, so the fact that the 24/192 sounded better than CD does not confirm that this quality improvement was due to the bit rate/depth.)

Controversial. More: From

http://www.whathifi.com/news/high-resolution-audio-everything-you-need-to-know

I found this link among others purporting to debunk the 24/192 hype, posted by user narfybob:

http://xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html

The 24 bit depth, related to dynamic range, provides no benefit over 16 bit CD IMO. The dynamic range (difference between noise floor and loudest SPL output) of 16 bit CD is already overkill, especially if there is any background noise at all. (Classical music is the biggest problem, producers seem to think it a virtue to exploit CD dynamic range to the fullest, which means you have to turn up the volume to hear the soft passages, then turn it down when the high volume passages assault you. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat...)

The 192 kHz sampling rate might seem at first blush to offer more potential improvement. According to apparently credible explanations such as the article linked above, the higher sampling rate actually introduces more problems due to intermodulation distortion while providing no discernible quality improvement.

With all that said, who has done true apples-to-apples double-blind ABX testing of 192/24 vs. 44.1/16, with verified 100% identical source master material on 100% identical reproduction chain? I'm not fully sold on the theoretical explanations, sometimes mathematicians miss things in the real world (cough).

Interesting reading....

So,
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Sporttster:
When are we going to see a turntable on these phones that play Master recorded vinyl???....

On a side note, anyone using Google Play Music and not able to use the built in EQ on the MXPE with it?? I have it enabled, have tried various settings bass punch, etc and no audible change in sound. I have the EQ enabled on GPM as well, set to use the phones EQ, still nothing. I do like the sound of the MXPE, even better than my Note 3.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zeroibis:
The turntable would require a head which is tied to the particular master vinyl to ensure the read is exactly the same as it was written. At the end of the day the only way to ensure you hear the exact sound that was produced from an analog source is to physically hear it at the time of its origin. I mean if you really get into it your going to need to have the same pressure, humidity level ect in order for the sound to travel though the air in the same way that it did between the source and the mic. You then get into a problem of what atmospheric conditions are ideal to recreate the indented sound when played.

All in all I think we can be happy with the DAC in the MXPE as long as it is at least giving us 16bit 44.1 with the lowest possible distortion.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tinkerer_:
I'm pretty darn happy with it. (As long as the Audio Effects is turned completely OFF.)

:)

It is puzzling though, how there is a complete dearth of information on the web about the DAC. I would think someone would post that somewhere.

Actually, the comment about recreating exact acoustic conditions of original recording is not far from a certain truth. Acoustics of playback environment (room) really alter the perceived sound, even changing audio quality substantially depending on position of listener vs. speakers. Also, bass frequencies form standing waves, with specifics depending on frequencies and room size/shape, that attenuate SPL in the center of room while artificially boosting SPL around the room perimeter near the walls. So using good headphones with a Digital Audio Player completely eliminates many acoustic faults of a free-standing stereo, just by eliminating the room acoustics influence. The MXPE with good headphones (and Audio Effects OFF) has phenomenal audio quality compared to even an audiophile free-standing stereo, because of this aspect. (Get ready for flames from audio purists. :)
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zeroibis:
Yea I look forward to testing the MXP on an Audio GD compass in bypass mode using the moon opamp connected to a DT990s to see how it compares against the compass DAC.

I will also run it though a Little Dot MK1+ with the LT1364 opamp connected to a Phonak Audeo (PFE) to see how it compares to the Wolfson WM8975 in my 4g iMod.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rm40f2:
Has anyone tried connecting their MXPE to a USB DAC? I did this with my Note 4 and it worked well, but with my MXPE the volume is very low. Of course I double checked my volume settings on the DAC, the amp, and the MXPE. Even when the amp and DAC were at 10 and the media volume on the MXPE set to max, the volume was much too low.

I tried Google Play Music and Poweramp playing FLAC files from SD card.
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] erikiksaz:
Bumping an older thread here, but I think I'm experiencing the same problem on my 2015 X.

I've had both the 2013 and 2014 X hooked up to my Fiio E18. With the 2013/2014 X, I would connect the 3.5mm cord from my car into the line out port. Sound quality was great, volume was loud.

With the 2015 X, connecting the same 3.5mm cord into the line out results in low audio output, which can't really be amplified by changing the volume dial in my car. Instead, I have to connect it to the headphone output, but even with the volume dial on the E18 fully dialed up, it's still quieter than the 2013/2014 X. It only reaches the same level of volume when I turn on the gain switch, but that type of amplification sounds too artificial.

Does that sound similar to what you're experiencing?
[X Style (Pure) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rm40f2:
Erm, your description confused me so bear with me. What do you mean by line out? The headphone jack is 3.5mm, and then there's a micro USB port that can be used for USB audio out.

When I connect my MXP directly to my car stereo via 3.5mm audio cable, I can adjust the volume of my car stereo to achieve sufficient volume. In this configuration, I keep the media volume of my MXP at max.

When I connect my MXP directly to IEMs (plugged into 3.5mm jack), I can adjust the media volume of my MXP to achieve sufficient volume. In this configuration, the media volume of my MXP is never at max.

However, when I connect my MXP to my USB DAC, which in turn is connected to a headphone amp, I am unable to achieve sufficient volume. The media volume of my MXP is at max and the volume of my DAC and amp is at 10.

So in my experience, only USB audio is a problem.