yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[X Style (Pure) General] nikeman513:
It says relocked, so they know its been locked before.
[X Style (Pure) General] nikeman513:
I promise you after all the publicity that they've stated they won't issue a warranty on unlocked bootloaders that you will have problems. I'm looking forward to your ranting :D
[X Style (Pure) General] channeledbymodem:
What am I missing? I thought the ST warranty extended the manufacturer warranty, not replaced it. And why do you need moto care also? Adds a lot of expense, no?
[X Style (Pure) General] buggerritt:
Mistyped. Meant to type "drop the moto care".
[X Style (Pure) General] channeledbymodem:
So is the ST warranty available immediately even if Moto's warranty is invalid?
[X Style (Pure) General] buggerritt:
Yeah. Check out their website. Anything happens, aside from loss or theft, and you're covered, right away.
[X Style (Pure) General] slaytanic:
Motocare
[X Style (Pure) General] slaytanic:
Moto care Cracked screen is covered still and anything not related to unlocking the boot loader. According to this. Take it with a grain of salt I guess lol
[X Style (Pure) General] mseliga:
I wouldn't put to much stock in the chat support to be honest. If you look at the waiting room thread people get conflicting information all the time. Since it's not a developer edition, I would assume it would voided. That may not be the case, but chat and forum support, especially as they are being hounded by people every day on the status of their phone, isn't a place to put to much faith.

Sent from my HTC One M8
[X Style (Pure) General] mmaaddict78:
Unlocked my bootloader before I even put my sim card in the phone. If I break the screen, I'll replace it myself. If you break this phone a year from now, you'll likely get a refurbished one back from warranty. Screw that.
[X Style (Pure) General] djramod:
My new phone has a dead white pixel, i was talking to an agent online and he said if i unlocked the bootloader my warranty is automatically voided :(
[X Style (Pure) General] rm40f2:
Edit: nvm
[X Style (Pure) General] cyris69:
Was going to try signing up for feedback system to get beta software stuff before mass rollout. Got this. It's shown Sep 2016 since I got it even while bootloader unlocked since the first few mins of having device.

EDIT:

Seems due to this :)

Hi, I do apologize for that, Because we have a system update so we cannot check also the warranty of your device.
[X Style (Pure) General] djramod:
If you unlocked the bootloader you warranty is automatically voided... I got a dead pixel on my display, talked to an agent and he said my warranty is voided since i unlocked the bootloader... On their page shows that my warranty expires sep 2016 though... Sorry my bad english:D
[X Style (Pure) General] joshw0000:
Mine still shows warranty until 9/2016 and I unlocked several days ago.
[X Style (Pure) General] cyris69:
Mine updated back to valid today. They've check my IMEI a handful of times when I've had issues and never mentioned not having support/warranty. Guess time will tell.
[X Style (Pure) General] jon7701:
Just like numerous people in this thread, I unlocked my bootloader and it still shows that I have my warrenty until November 2016. (Not sure why its so long, must be because it's from Best Buy.) It's been about 48 hours since I unlocked.

Edit: Also I think it's possible since the Pure Edition is essentially the Style, it's possible that they never changed the pure edition to being a dev phone on their website and so it showed up as your warrenty being voided. It seems that they have since fixed that. That would also explain why you have to get a key from motorola to unlock, since they may have the same bootloader, just with a different device name.
[X Style (Pure) General] cyris69:
Ok, got more information.

unlocking voids your initial purchase manufacture 1 year warranty, it DOES NOT void your motocare protection.
[X Style (Pure) General] patt2k:
Buy square-trade warranty. I guess if unlocking really does void warranty then square trade will get lots of customers from here :)
[X Style (Pure) General] cyris69:
So since unlocking doesn't void motocare no need to use squaretrade just file it under motocare. Since the dead pixel isn't "physical" damage just give it a good drop and send it in lol.
[X Style (Pure) General] brholt6:
I would make 100% sure that Moto Care is unaffected before I dropped it if I were him...remember that chat support folks were the same ones who originally told many of us that unlocking the bootloader would not void the warranty.
[X Style (Pure) General] cyris69:
I asked and was moved to tier 2 support and this was the answer i got.
[X Style (Pure) General] rushless:
The Pure is not a dev phone, as sold. It is called the Pure due to no carrier or UI bloat, per the launch event. Not a free ticket to mod unless registered as a dev device.
[X Style (Pure) General] erikiksaz:
Then explain why unlocking didn't void the warranty with the 2014 Pure.
[X Style (Pure) General] ritchea:
Luck?

Lack of communication that you did request an unlock code?

Motorola doesn't mean what they printed in CAPS in the LEGAL AGREEMENT AND WARNING you signed when you got the unlock code?

That document clearly outlines Motorola's intention not to honor warranty repair on unlocked non-dev devices. Both 2014 and 2015 Pure editions lack the "dev" label. I've read people reporting that the Pure 2014 was considered a dev edition. If so, Motorola has chosen not to be transparent about it. (re: link). If it is indeed a "dev" edition, that would explain it.

Discrepancies in how the unlocked Pure 2015 is reported on individual accounts is adding to the confusion.

IDK. All this confusion makes waiting to see what Google brings to the table worth it IMHO.
[X Style (Pure) General] Orion116:
Actually the 2014 X was a Dev version. The pure accordingly is not a Dev version.
[X Style (Pure) General] ritchea:
Correct. Source of reports I referenced. The first post and others (they don't seem to have post numbers) repeat that the X "Pure" Edition 2014 was considered (by Motorola) a developers device. I have no idea if it was except that it is not listed as such on the Moto device download page I referenced. I don't own any of them but was seriously looking at this new one.
[X Style (Pure) General] AJZ12:
I was just told that the Pure can be treated as the Dev edition phone. I was talking to the a rep on chat about a discount Motorola doesn't want to honor and asked decided to ask if the unlocking the bootloader voids the warranty. He said it does not on the Pure edition. I never reply to posts so I can't attach any links yet but I saved the chat in case anyone wants to see it via some other method besides this post.
[X Style (Pure) General] nikeman513:
Chat reps are stupid under trained high school degree/GED people. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but they aren't exactly as on up to date on the whole unlocking, and know how as we are. This has been confirmed to void warranty, lets stop going back and forth on this.
[X Style (Pure) General] wicked0ne:
For what it's worth I just got off Motorola's chat and was informed by the chat rep(yea no idea how concrete this is) that unlocking the bootloader on the 2015 Motorola X Pure Edition does NOT void the warranty. He even went to to mention how the pure is considered a "developers edition" phone. I asked him if he was 100% certain and he said he was 101%(lol) certain and that he was been working with Motorola for 2 years and that "he can't be wrong about that"

He did genuinely seem like he knew what I was talking about and that he believes he is correct on the issue. Whether Motorola actually agrees with this I have no idea but this chat rep had no doubt that the 2015 Pure is a developers edition phone and that unlocking the bootloader WILL NOT void the warranty.

I have screenshotted the conversation, requested a reference number to the chat session and a email of the conversation. He even said I can contact him directly via the email if there are any issues.

Here is a small image of what he said.

*EDIT* I have no idea how to attach a image to this forum so here is a link instead

http://i.imgur.com/NfQppeg.jpg
[X Style (Pure) General] nikeman513:
They've already done Press releases about it, managers have spoken about it, and their twitter and Facebook page confirmed the subject that it is not a dev phone. I'm sorry, but that guy is wrong. Unless something is wrong. I'd ask for a manager before doing anything you might regret.
[X Style (Pure) General] wicked0ne:
Absolutely. I'm going to wait it out until there is a 100000% certain answer from official's at Motorola if unlocking the bootloader voids the warranty AND motocare. So many different answers have been given. Some say it will not void the warranty AND motocare. Some say it voids the warranty and NOT motocare.

I was just trying to throw my two cents in and share what the chat rep told me. If anyone is actually worried about voiding warranty/motocare then absolutely wait for a official statement.
[X Style (Pure) General] nikeman513:
That's just the thing, a press release is a formal statement by Motorola. It's pretty much set in stone. Now they could change their minds, but they would do another PR about it.
[X Style (Pure) General] pinoymutt:
I posted this over on the Moto forum as well, but this page has the list of "official" developer devices. Pretty much, unless the 2015 X Pure (or Style) shows up on this page, you can assume that it's NOT classified as a dev edition and thus would be subject to warranty cancellation: https://motorola-global-portal.custhelp.com/app/standalone/bootloader/recovery-images
[X Style (Pure) General] tech_head:
I posted this on the Motorola forum.

For the last time, they CANNOT void your hardware warranty for unlocking the bootloader no matter how many boxes they have you click.

Federal law - Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act prohibits it.

Motorola and parent Lenovo should look at the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and also California Consumer Protection law. Unlocking the bootloader cannot be the sole purpose for a warranty denial. Unlocking the bootloader and having a button fall off are two independent events.

Trying to tie them together violates the Magnuson-Moss act. It is also not possible to have a consumer waive the protections under the act. It goes against good public policy (Ca. Civil Code). Computer, auto, appliance, etc. manufacturers can't wholesale void warranties that have no relation to the act of using a non-specified part, software, etc.

If this were the case, the mere act of using a third party charger could void the warranty if Motorola said using a third party charger voids the warranty and had one sign a form. We all know that unless the charger is the cause of the damage this isn't the case.

Now Motorola/Lenovo can deny software support if one installs non-standard software on the device. They can also deny support if one bricks their device. If a non-related hardware failure occurs, Motorola will have a hard time denying a claim for something unrelated to the bootloader unlock.

https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/sta...nty-federal-trade-commission-improvements-act http://consumer.findlaw.com/consumer-transactions/what-will-void-a-warranty-.html

Real Life Examples of Warranty Limitations: Cell phone manufacturer voids warranty for jailbreaking or the equivalent to run unauthorized software. Jailbreaking or the equivalent is legal and the manufacturer must prove the jailbreak and/or unauthorized software is the cause of the hardware failure.
[X Style (Pure) General] OneNutShort:
Thank you for posting this. This is congruent with various tech articles I have seen written on the topic over the years, but it's nice to have it stated in such a concise statement.
[X Style (Pure) General] rehpyc:
People who believe that "unlocking the bootloader will void a hardware-related warranty" bs must be the same type that buy into car dealerships scaring them by saying they must service their car at the dealer in order to retain the warranty. Consumers are protected, as products they purchase are THEIRS. If something breaks, it's on the manufacturer to prove that the fault to the product was induced by something the consumer did in order to void a warranty. As tech_head has mentioned, a phone manufacturer cannot void a hardware warranty of a button failing (or the like) due to a software change.

Samsung once tried to deny warranty for a power button failure (known issue on Samsung phones, with their pos buttons), due to receiving my phone with custom software running on it. As the two things are obviously unrelated, quickly reminding them that the hardware failure could not have been caused by my custom software had them replacing the button and returning my phone w/o charge. I personally am not afraid of Motorola not doing the same, if the situation were to arise. Now, if you brick your phone by messing up the firmware or such, then obviously they have grounds for denying your warranty coverage.

Furthermore, everyone should remember that many major credit cards extend the warranty life by 1 year for an item purchased with that card. This means that between Motorola's 1 year warranty + the cc's 1 year, you're covered for 2 years of any defect with the phone. If you're not prone to dropping your phone, you shouldn't be wasting money on MotoCare over fear of the phone failing on you.
[X Style (Pure) General] cyris69:
In the end what is to stop them from stating the bootloader unlocked caused x? I mean how can you fight it, I know if it came down to it I'm not going to spend money getting a lawyer to fight it.

However, im not planning on flashing anything but want root for xprivacy so I unlocked and went on my way. Though I would flash an omni rom if happened to get made. I just don't see how you could fight a denial without paying for it somehow.

With my discussions with the reps they state motocare is still valid just that the initial warranty that comes from purchase is void.

I may have to deal with this soon if some of my sensors are indeed bad.

I hope I can be like; look refer to this law, suck it, now fix my phone.
[X Style (Pure) General] tech_head:
They must prove it.

A quick note to the FTC and your state Attorney General and a note to their legal department and customer relations will get them moving.

No need to hire a lawyer.

Print out my previous post and send it in with the phone.

They will walk back from that statement in a hurry.
[X Style (Pure) General] cogeary:
A reassuring read. Motorola basically stated this yesterday: https://forums.motorola.com/posts/cda80927a1?commentId=982820#982820
[X Style (Pure) General] tech_head:
Because they know what I know.
[X Style (Pure) General] rehpyc:
Good to see they're properly covering themselves and reassuring us consumers. Now people shouldn't fear unlocking their phones :)

Sent from my XT1575
[X Style (Pure) General] cyris69:
Good to see them update the info, but feel safe as well with previous posters talking about laws in place. Seems like I'll go the motocare route for accident protection that I'm very prone to.
[X Style (Pure) General] joshw0000:
I checked my warranty again yesterday. Still showing 9/2016. I agree with others. Motorola can (and likely will) deny a claim if you brick your phone or if you're not receiving OTA's. They should cover hardware related issues.
[X Style (Pure) General] ShaunWinSC:
Looks like we have the official answer.

http://www.droid-life.com/2015/09/2...x-pure-edition-bootloader-voids-the-warranty/
[X Style (Pure) General] buggerritt:
You're just better off with squaretrade. It covers everything. You can even smash it with a hammer and they'll just pay out.
[X Style (Pure) General] pinoymutt:
Do you know if Squaretrade works from day one, or does it only kick in when the original mfg warranty expires?

That's the regular smartphone plan, right?
[X Style (Pure) General] Sporttster:
One of the key reasons I'm getting this phone is that the BL can be unlocked and I'll be dam@$d if this is gonna stop me!! We've all complained like crazy about manufacturers not allowing us to unlock our phones. I think Moto should be applauded for allowing this as it's pretty darned unusual nowadays. I'm going with either Verizons smartphone insurance, my home insurance and adding the phone or something like that. Wasn't planning on relying on Moto's warranty anyway. Cannot wait to get this phone in my hands and start tinkering!! Hope there's lots of ROMS and whatnot here! Feel like I've been in a desert with my Note 3's locked bl.....
[X Style (Pure) General] juancaperez2000:
So the unlock bootloader only kill the warranty for fried you phone due the flashing roms or kernels but if you broke your phone I mean your screen or charging port your phone still covered for motocare, for the price of the phone I dont really care about unlock my bootloader based on the time that i been on android I never kill a phone and I been in this since HTC evo 4g, also how many of you going to keep this phone next year not to many right and dont expect to sale this phone for more than $200 next year. So lets unlock your bootloader
[X Style (Pure) General] buggerritt:
It's right from the time you purchase it. It's insurance,not a warranty. If they cannot fix your phone, they pay you the amount it would cost to buy a new one. No refurbished crap, like from asurion. It doesn't matter if it's software related, submerged in water, dropped from a skyscraper,or run over by a Mack truck. If you have the parts to ship them and they can't put it together like new, you are reimbursed.

---------- Post added at 08:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:59 AM ----------

True. I've been flashing ROM's for years. The only way you can truly brick a phone, is of your USB port, hardware buttons, or screen is physically damaged. If you can connect it to your computer and get into download mode, you can fix anything you screwed up. Having custom recovery and the ability to backup is great too. I don't understand why the option to backup and restore isn't built into stock recovery. All they offer is wipe data/factory reset, which is for crap unless you're just returning your phone.
[X Style (Pure) General] joshw0000:
This is about the best you can ask for. I honestly don't think a manufacturer should be held liable for defects cause by unlocking.

When I bought my Mustang (which the previous owner supercharged at a local Roush dealer), the dealership SOLD me an extended warranty that covered the engine, supercharger, ect. I started thinking about it later (and read all the fine print on the warranty) and the entire warranty was null/void because it was altered from how it was built in a manner that could/likely will one day cause engine trouble.

Long story, short, I was refunded for the warranty but I don't blame the ensuring company for not covering consumer created damage and I don't blame Motorola for not covering software related damage. My biggest concern was hardware failure and they've admitted that they'll cover that... So we're good.
[X Style (Pure) General] Darnell_Chat_TN:
Have you actually made a SquareTrade claim? I've made many over the years. They always default to having you use the manufacturer's warranty first. If your claim is within the first year, they will send you the OEM's service information, to have the OEM service the covered device. If the OEM will not service it, then you have to go back to SquareTrade and see whether they will service what the OEM refuses to service. But SquareTrade tries to only be a supplement, after the OEM warranty expires. They may service what the OEM refuses to help with. But this involves dealing with the OEM first and time spent with that, before perhaps getting SquareTrade to cover, when within the OEM warranty timeframe.

---------- Post added at 10:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:57 AM ----------

From SquareTrade's Terms and Conditions:

(some emphasis added by me)

You all may want to think twice about what you feel SquareTrade will cover for you and how they will cover it.
[X Style (Pure) General] joshw0000:
Just checked My Stuff again and warranty still shows valid. Also looks like you can buy 1, 2, and/or 3 years of Motocare now.
[X Style (Pure) General] Darnell_Chat_TN:
That's 12 months, 15 months or 2 years/24 months.
[X Style (Pure) General] joshw0000:
What I had misinterpreted is the last option for $20 to add one year. Since the beginning date is in 2016 I assume that's just extending the factory warranty. At first glance it appeared to be a 1 year add-on to the 2 year warranty. Kinda weird nonetheless.
[X Style (Pure) General] buggerritt:
What you quoted must not be for the cell phone plans, which on their cover page explains that it does, in fact, cover liquid damage, as well as other problems mentioned in what your highlighted paste specifically claims are not covered.

http://www.squaretrade.com/smartphone-warranty

Scroll down to see what is covered.
[X Style (Pure) General] Darnell_Chat_TN:
See the dates it shows the coverage last till. That's the best way to know.
[X Style (Pure) General] joshw0000:
Or look at the coverage type - Accident Protection vs Extended Service Plan.

So for Accident Protection, there's only 2 options - 15 months or 24.
[X Style (Pure) General] Darnell_Chat_TN:
Do you have a PDF link? That URL you provided only pulls up a blank page for me.

And even still, I'm sure it notes you can't do some of the things you mentioned, such as intentional abuse. And I am also sure, they will point you to Moto first, if within the warranty period. I'm sure it mentions other things I would be happy to show you.
[X Style (Pure) General] joshw0000:
Looks like you quoted the wrong person. I provided no url.
[X Style (Pure) General] Darnell_Chat_TN:
Already fixed it :) .
[Other SmartWatches] Tatsuumi:
Hi! Im planning on buying this ZGPAX S29. Have you tried the Watchmaker app with this? Does it really work?? Thanks in Advance!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] ricardo122:
Hi, i'm new in this of roms and all the thing, so I'm trying to figure out which is best for me.

The only thing that interests me is that you can use the S-pen with the pressure sensitive, nothing more (i bought the tablet only to draw, and read sometimes, practically the only application i use is the Autodesk SketchBook), so i do not need the touchwiz or any of the things of Samsung, just the pen.

There is some rom in which work? If all have the ability.... Which of them is the cleanest system to make the battery last me as long as possible?

I have the SM-P600
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] Orion116:
BrokenOS is good. Temasek is another. LiquidSmooth is also good.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] ricardo122:
thanks men, i give a look on these.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014 Edition) Q&A, Help & Troubl] juggaknot77:
Temasek is great. I use it on both my nexus 6 and note 10.1
[YU Yureka Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sspanda:
Hi,

I have yu yureka Mobile phone and its rooted, but everything running well except Proximity Sensor.When I call/Receive Someone the Sensor doesn't work. Can you please Suggest how to Solve this problem.
[YU Yureka Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bharat g:
Upgrade to Lolipop and calibrate the proximity sensor.

To calibrate the Proximity sensor open phone dialer and enter *#*#7769#*#* (aka *#*#PROX#*#*) and tap on START. When Calibration Good appears, exit. Done.
[YU Yureka Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] krsooraj:
didnt help- *#*#7769#*#* didnt help fix the issue.

Proximity sensor still doesn't work
[YU Yureka Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pratyush kapoor:
*#*#7769#*#*....do it 4-5 times....and reboot..clear all the data of dialer.. ..then reboot
[Android Apps and Games] lonyr:
HIT THE BALLS

Just hit the balls and enjoy the fun!

The game becomes little tougher when you start playing higher levels. But, you can certainly do it with little concentration. It is designed in such a way that the excitement increases with each level.

Playstore Link: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.saapps.hittheballsf

Screens:

Any issues or observations, please let me know.