yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC One S] letsurock:
FYI, I just compile. If slim plans to implement, then sure it may. I can suggest you to use "Midnight - Layer Theme" for total black, as of now .
[HTC One S] truevision:
Sorry for delay... but, how I can install "Midnight - Layer Theme" ? I have download it but I can find where set it...
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Midnight Layer Theme

You need to install via Layers manager.
[HTC One S] derkleinebroicher:
This is what you need to install any layers theme.
[HTC One S] truevision:
there is a way to get this app without play store ?
[HTC One S] derkleinebroicher:
Surely, but I don't think, you really need my help therefore. Use Google and type layers manager apk and your question will be answered. BTW version 4.2 is the last one, as far as I know.

Gesendet von meinem One S mit Tapatalk
[HTC One S] Rapier:
Why would you need that? It's free... And I won't recommend you to take it from an unofficial source for several reasons...one of them being the fact it won't upgrade itself so you'll loose fast features included in newest versions
[HTC One S] truevision:
I wanna try to keep Google out from my life ! ;)
[HTC One S] Rapier:
Then you should switch to iPhone or Windows phone... Android IS Google with or without it's GAPPS :)

Sent from nowhere over the air...
[HTC One S] truevision:
I think that using an operating system that is different access to the Internet and to Google's servers with a Google Account... IMHO.

But this is not a right place to talk about this.... :D

---------- Post added at 08:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:42 AM ----------

I'm on this rom from few days and I notice a smooth behaviour. Great !

I also have set a kernel under clocking.
[HTC One S] truevision:
installed Midnight Layer... now is perfect !
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Glad to know :). The credit also goes to [MENTION=4707212]Bitti09[/MENTION] for porting full Layers compatibility. The Layers from original SlimLP is a bit broken.
[HTC One S] fradav:
Sorry to bug you again about this, could you share your local_manifests file(s) you used to build the rom ?

Regards,
[HTC One S] letsurock:
https://github.com/SlimBit/platform_manifest by [MENTION=4707212]Bitti09[/MENTION]
[HTC One S] fradav:
It's missing ville related device trees repos :) I've manually added cyanogenmod's ones, but I can't launch the usual breakfast/brunch ville...
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Follow this, http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2581659
[HTC One S] fradav:
Hey thanks for this!

I'm getting old... I've seen *and* used this guide a few times... almost two years ago and completely forgot about it :mad:

The missing piece was the only the .mk file mod

Thanks again
[HTC One S] Bitti09:
Reason: It's only the rom base so everyone can use his own cm device tree to build the rom.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Do you want to build for HBOOT 2.16?
[HTC One S] Pori12:
Seems nice job! Any significant bugs?
[HTC One S] letsurock:
No. Sometimes you can encounter with "Can't connect to Camera", which can also be found in other LP roms.
[HTC One S] Pori12:
Which kernel do you recommend with DT2W or S2W options? Does the default kernel have it?

BTW, I (seemed to have) installed Midnight layer by Layers Manager for all overlays. But after reboot nothing changed. I tried other layers theses too, none worked. Help me please!
[HTC One S] letsurock:
This comes with stock kernel. Try the kernel which has those features. It should work fine.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
New Build, 0.9 version. 13 Oct.

New build is now available for download at OP or here.
[HTC One S] Pori12:
Great, thank you! This might become my favourite rom!

Is it right to dirty flash this update over 0.8 version?

Any advice please for solving my layer problem (#36)?
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Yes, dirty flash works fine. And regarding the Layers problem, I don't encounter the above mentioned problem. Maybe try updating your Layers Manager.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
How many HBoot 2.16 users would like to try this rom?
[HTC One S] moozon:
[/COLOR]

+1
[HTC One S] Pori12:
I uninstalled Layer M., then dirty flashed 0.9. Reinstalled LM but still nothing is changed after installing a layer.

Also, I found when I toggle torch by quick settings it often can not be switched off. Or it switches off after some seconds and no way to switch on again.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Which version is ur Layers Manager? Version 4.2 should work fine. And regarding torch, it works perfect and instantaneously with quick settings.
[HTC One S] Pori12:
Layers Manager Version 4.3.1 This is the current one at Play Store. Can I downgrade somehow?
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Latest version 4.3.1 works fine for me. Maybe should clear cache, data and re-install.
[HTC One S] Pori12:
Done, but nothing. It's not my game.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Can you explain the more about Error #54?

And if possible, make a clean install and let us know.
[HTC One S] Pori12:
OK! I had to install SuperSU instead of built in root manager.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Problem solved?

Was Privacy Guard enabled?
[HTC One S] Pori12:
Yes, solved. Themes are working fine!

I don't know anything about Privacy Guard. (?)
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Maybe Privacy Guard was preventing getting root access.
[HTC One S] Pori12:
PG was switched off completely.

Problem with the torch is a common LP bug just like the one with the camera. I suffered from it with my M7 with Sense 7 M9 port ROM too. I wonder how no one else experiences it. Try to switch on the torch, let the phone go to sleep, or switch off the screen, let it run 1-2 minutes, then try to switch off, etc. I suppose using it in various circumstances will point out the issue.
[HTC One S] truevision:
I want to say one more time...

This rom is amazing ! It gives me a extraordinary battery life and no one reboot o strange behaviour, nothing !

Long life to slimrom !
[HTC One S] Pori12:
I agree, it's excellent! The first AOSP ROM I find useful, really useful!

The only issue, I have 1% per hour battery drain when idle without any networks. I'm with base kernel.

With this ROM for example I got half or 1/3 of it.

How about yours? With other kernels maybe?
[HTC One S] truevision:
Gulp !

1% per hour is very low drain, it may depends to many variables, for examples service active or kernel behaviour.

The battery drain must valutate (imho) in a ordinary and daily use.
[HTC One S] mkoev:
how can we get for hboot 2.16 ? I am willing to build but I don't know how to patch for hboot 2.16.
[HTC One S] truevision:
[MENTION=3801794]letsurock[/MENTION] do you know if there is a good slimrom like this for nexus 4 ?

I have searching in forum but I don't found it.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
http://xdaforums.com/slimroms/general/rom-builders-collective-t2861778

http://xdaforums.com/nexus-4/orig-development/rom-slimkat-mako-t2508720/page874
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Slim-ville-5.1.1.beta.0.9-UNOFFICIAL-20151017-1214-2.16-HBOOT

Added 2.16 HBoot build.

You can download from OP or here.

Make sure you have backup before you flash this build.

I am not responsible for sad endings. :D

Feedback would be appreciated.

Happy weekend.
[HTC One S] mkoev:
unable to flash the 2.16 version. Gives me an error the second I select the zip file in recovery.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Can others confirm this issue? Hboot 2.16 users.
[HTC One S] moozon:
Confirm
[HTC One S] letsurock:
2.16 HBoot is now fully functional. Here is the link, also can be found at OP.

Thanks [MENTION=5477070]mmarkvoort[/MENTION] [MENTION=4765686]moozon[/MENTION] and [MENTION=5562787]mokev[/MENTION].
[HTC One S] Audioffensive:
You're welcome :)
[HTC One S] mkoev:
it boots ! :)
[HTC One S] truevision:
[MENTION=3801794]letsurock[/MENTION] you think that will be added more function to this slimrom, like "shake to postpone alarm", weather widget in lock screen and more...?

However, it is always perfect, no strange behavior and the battery life is amazing ! ;)
[HTC One S] letsurock:
If you know the commits, lets try.
[HTC One S] truevision:
sorry for delay...

Unfortunately I don't know this commits, we can wait slimroms team or someone can take a look... ;)
[HTC One S] Borman2000:
Can't connect to WiFi if Bluetooth is on. To connect to WiFi I need to turn BT OFF and reboot device.

On other hand, can't find any devices via BT if WiFi is on. BT looks ON but no devices found. If I turn BT OFF then I can't turn it back ON. Reboots only helps.

If I connected to WiFi and turning ON BT I lost internet connection immediately.

Slim-5.1.1-20151013

hboot 2.15

Clean flash
[HTC One S] truevision:
I'm on slim 20151013 too and I don't have this problem. All works good.
[HTC One S] truevision:
...no news ?
[HTC One S] letsurock:
New Build, 0.11 version. 06 Nov.

New version 0.11 is now available. Can also be found will at OP.

2.15: Slim-ville-5.1.1.beta.0.11-UNOFFICIAL-20151106-1621-2.15.zip

2.16, Not tested: Slim-ville-5.1.1.beta.0.11-UNOFFICIAL-20151106-1645-2.16.zip
[HTC One S] truevision:
uhm... I'm a clairvoyant ?!

:)

Thank you for your work !

PS: there is a little changelog ?
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Nah, No idea :p
[HTC One S] truevision:
I try to download 0.11.. but the file seems to be broken... and without md5 I can't check it...
[HTC One S] letsurock:
2.15 or 2.16?

If 2.15, it should work fine. Because I am using it. Maybe I can re-uploaded if it helps.
[HTC One S] truevision:
2.15.

That's weird, I tried with different browsers... if you upload one more time can you upload also md5 file ?
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Try this.
[HTC One S] truevision:
now it works good !

Many thanx !
[HTC One S] truevision:
I'm on 0.11 SlimLP, I have a strange behavior with 3G. Sometimes 3G don't works, I try to deactivate from tile and also in option data but he failed.

The only possibility to reactivate 3G is to reboot the device.
[HTC One S] letsurock:
I don't use data internet so, I can't confirm that. But, I see that Flashlight from tiles doesn't work.
[HTC One S] truevision:
Flashlight from tiles works good fo me !
[HTC One S] mkoev:
0.11 version for hboot 2.16 installs and works fine in case someone wanted to try it :)
[HTC One S] Bitti09:
Short Info:

If the One S has a cm13/mm device tree the OP can start building my new MM Rom(the succesor of my SlimBit LP Rom) by end of this week .
[HTC One S] letsurock:
Unfortunately not :(. Not commits for Ville for CM 13.0 as of now.
[HTC One S] vp1407:
Now that Slim6 is launched, anyone willing to build it for Ville? Preferable hboot 2.16 :)
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] JcNeji:
I own a TyTN and since recently i can't install nothing from the device itself.

I downloaded Picsel Browser(CAB), Opera Browser(JAVA) as well as some others, but i just cant install.

I also cant delete anything out of the explorer nor can i cut or paste.

i havent done weird stuff to the phone so i dont know whats causing it.

anyone know anything?

thx
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] bapski:
have you tried soft resetting? if you have and you still have the same problem, suggest you HARD RESET if all fails, then i would think youd have to reFLASH..
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] Aeneas:
id suggest what bapski said, i had this problem and i hard-reset and solved

be sure to backup contacts etc
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] alancstan:
Me too.... just Hard reset n all the problem solved!
[8525, TyTN, MDA Vario II, JasJam General] JcNeji:
k it worked, just a hard reset:P

thx for the help
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] blaspheme000:
Help guys i'm i a real pinch,

im stuck on firmware upgrade error at startup and can only access download mode.

so i thought i should flash stock firmware following the steps in a thread by someone

but whenever i try to flash stock firmware via odin it gets stuck at Kernel part saying

NAND write start

i searched everywhere and come across the super brick but it is very complicated and i am a newbie.

and i cant really tell the difference between a soft brick and hard brick.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Chaudhary Abdul:
Try With Other Versions of odin

try with other usb ports

try with other usb cables

try flashing various roms

uninstall kies if installed
[Xperia SP General] varioventus:
First of all, this is not a childish "versus" topic to flame fanboys spirits. I just need some technical understanding of some issues.

So... I've run four or five Lollipop 5.1.1 custom ROMs on my C5303, including CM, AICP, XenonHD, Mokee. All are great and fast and developers made a tremendous job. Not all of them are so friendly with Tangerine kernel (I need a custom kernel for increasing in-calls phone volume), per instance, Mokee hangs and struggle like hell. AICP works well with T-kernel, but with some issues (reported by users), when the device will freeze for a few seconds. XenonHD loves T-kernel - no problem at all!

Still, all of these fantastic custom ROMs , with or without custom kernel, are sluggish compared with stock 4.3 Sony ROM. I've made a nandroid backup in TWRP of my XenonHD - T-Kernel installation and installed Binomical SLIM 4.3 base don stock. Just for the heck of remembering the Sony UI, I intended to restore XenonHD soon after. I'm still on Binomical 4.3. Man, this is FAST! This is a blazing rocket compared with any of the Lollipop ROMs!

On Lollipop ROMs I've had ~ 300 MB free RAM, on stock 4.3 (OK, deodexed and slim) I only have 150 MB, but Sony's ROM is way faster and smoother. It really looks like I have a completely new device in my hand. How is this possible? Why? The hardware drivers? Is X-SP really not able to handle Lollipop in a decent manner?

XDA developers worked so hard to gave us the Lollipop ROMs, and I praise their work, but looks like X-SP best choice is still the old JellyBean 4.3. :rolleyes:
[Xperia SP General] umair42:
Agree.

All lollipop roms are really fast in the beginning but after sometime,it begins to lag and become slow and sluggish.I have tried many lollipop roms but always returned to stock rom.It's been 2-3 months that i'm on stock and didn't flashed any other rom.
[Xperia SP General] NicestRudeGuy:
dude flash latest cm12.1 nightly nd ull forget stock
[Xperia SP General] mn399:
4.1.2>4.3>5.1.1
[Xperia SP General] Guizão BR:
I dont think this, i not know what version you test of aicp and xennon, thes lasts versions of aicp are laggy and xennon has battery drain sometimes, but the others no, all depends of the rom, have lollipops roms laggy and have lollipop fast roms, have kikkat laggy roms and have kitkat fast roms, and the same of all android version, the rom stock have good performance but battery drains, now i in miui 7, performance and battery are awesome
[Xperia SP General] varioventus:
I NEVER had battery drains on stock ROM. Yes, lots of bloatware on official stock , but not battery drains. I also didn't encounter battery drain on any of the Lollipop ROM's I've tried - AICP stable and about 10 version of nightlies, CM, XenonHD latest and Mokee. Yes, those were not so "green" as stock, but nothing so horrible, maybe 10-20% less battery power than stock. The issues regarding battery were on calibration of the battery percentage, per instance it used to go downward normally till 6%, then, bang!, the telephone turned off with 0% battery all of a sudden. Anyway, this is a insignificant issue, I don't care if I'm gonna recharge battery one hour earlier, the real problem that brought me back to 4.3 stock was the PERFORMANCE.

What I can't figure out is how come 300MB free RAM Lollipop is worst than 150 MB RAM JellyBean. Why? Xperia SP can't deal with ART instructions, it's Dalvik-only? I mean, OK, our developers have limited resources and most of them test their code on their own device, they have to be careful and not trying something risky; by contrast, Sony have unlimited resources to develop and tune their ROM. I know that, it's obvious, all my respect to XDA developers. What I'm trying to figure out is what's that bump in the road, what keeps X-SP Lollipop to be blazing fast? It's ART? It's drivers? I't Tangerine kernel, that most of us "married" with LP ROM's?

Thank you guys.
[Xperia SP General] TechnoSparks:
To be honest, you have answered your own question based on your newer question.

It is optimisation, man. 4.3 (or prior), those stock ROMs are made by Sony. Since it is made by Sony, you can expect a very great deal out of it, battery life, performance and all of those sweet things.

Since Sony lied to SP users and abandoned the SP with the last known version 4.3, we have problems on optimising ROMs because of no official blobs to refer to.

It has been until now. Everything is, thanks to the hard work of developers, our Xperia SP can still run newer Android versions while still maintaining the "blaziness" of the ROM.

Needless to say, its optimisations.

As always, you have the rights on which ROM to use, so choose the one that suits you. :)
[Xperia SP General] bulanula:
Guys, I am thinking of buying Xperia SP to use with Cyanogenmod 12.1 instead of cheap budget phone like Motorola E 4G. Price for me is the same, actually SP is cheaper than Motorola E.

I like SP because fast CPU and GPU ( Adreno 320 ! ) so it's no slouch and it has official CM12.1 support. I don't want to use anything other than latest 12.1 but I'm worried about performance and battery. Is it really that bad ?

I cannot try out the ROMs myself as I have not bought SP yet.

Is any CM12.1 ROM stable, fast and with good battery performance ? I see you have custom kernels for CM12.1 but what is the Linux version - is it 3.10 or above ?

Does SP have heating issues and performance problems ( like so many claim here ) ? Or maybe that appears only after some years of usage ?

What about this screen flickering problem which seems to be present in all CM12.1 ? How bad is it ?

Thanks for your assistance !
[Xperia SP General] kojata:
"Does SP have heating issues and performance problems ( like so many claim here ) ? Or maybe that appears only after some years of usage ?" It has those issues, but I think it depends on certain devices. Mine for example overheats with any rom, no matter stock or custom, while there are people who never experience those problems. As for stock vs custom it's clear enough that stock is best optimised.
[Xperia SP General] albertojr.neto:
I tested a lot ROMS.

I like the OMNI ROM (Android 4.4.4). It's really fast and stable. Maybe you should try it.

I like also the Xenon HD ROM (Android 5.1.1). It's fast. Not so stable, but still very good..

After a few days it gets a little laggy. I´d liked to know why to. Faced the same problem with AICP.
[Xperia SP General] iirisa:
I've had similar experience as you guys with lollipop custom ROMS. As much as I wanted to like them, after trying few, I have switched back to stock. Lollipop roms look nice, they offer more features and battery life is amazing compared to stock. However, none of the roms are stable enough to be used as a daily driver. After few days every single one of them refused to boot up, forcing my phone into recovery mode, so the only way out was to reflash. It has been a nice experience, but XSP is my one and only phone needed for communication, not a toy, therefore I need something that works and does it reliably. I think I'd just get a nexus or motorola when it's the time to upgrade.
[Xperia SP General] varioventus:
No heating issues, I mean CPU gets hot sometimes (with not regard of the ROM installed), but it's all at thigh as 60°C. Most Android devices are well in specs on that thermal level.

Performance regarded. CM Vanilla or most of the 5.1.1 custom ROM - it's fast for the day 1, then it gets little sluggish, you'll have to boot to recovery and clear dalvik/art cache to refresh you device. If you don't need kernel level modifications I recommend you to stay with stock FOTA, Tangerine kernel might cause some screen or device freeze and stutter.

Years of usage to get slower performance? LOL We're talking about hours!

Display flickering (or getting yellowish) I guess it's hardware related - some X-SP never experienced it (mine included).
[Xperia SP General] bulanula:
OK. Thanks for your feedback guys. I cannot test myself since I don't have device.

Do you think developer support is strong enough that they will manage to get Android 6 working properly on SP ?
[Xperia SP General] BPavel:
big dilemma

Hi guys,

I have big dilemma what to do. My wife liked to buy the XSP because of the LED lights etc. She uses the phone mostly for calling, texting and music listening. As she has the Deezer premium acc I went in big troubles with XSP because the known bad memory management. More than one year she have bothered with it(and me too :rolleyes: . After the 2years waranty ending I have decided to root, UBL and test custom ROMs. First we have tried the lightered stock ArchXperia, which was not helping us. Now she is since August on CM12 nightly. Yes, Deezer works good now, but on the other hand she is missing the stock Sony apps, working LED bar(with music), stock FM radio and generaly dislike the 5.1 Android (she is little bit old school, not likes many new things to learn).

Please, could somebody recommend to me any rom, which is stable, close to stock look (apps incl.) and has good ram management, that Deezer will work good, without memory issues?

Was it maybe wrong, that I have skipped the 4.4.4 Android over?

Many thanks in advance for any kind of tip or idea.
[Xperia SP General] varioventus:
Try a slim stock ROM, just as Binomical, based o stock JB 4.3. .207. It includes Williams kernel and that might do the trick with RAM management.
[Xperia SP General] BPavel:
Yes, thank you, I was thinking about exactly this one... good to have the choice confirmed. Just installed, look forward to try it and test it on my wife ;)
[Xperia SP General] kojata:
Or maybe you can check out the cm11 last build. Used to be on cm11 for a year with William's kernel and was pretty good. With some apps you can have the disco lights fully functional.
[LG G Watch R] vaorr:
Anyone have this issue on the date in the pull down bar whith the last update?
[LG G Watch R] geoz67:
No, mine is fine.
[LG G Watch R] vaorr:
maybe is problem in portuguese language!
[Redmi Note Android Development] _LLJY:
Recently, I have been browsing on the miui forums(en.miui.com) seeing people ranting about miui 7 having no lollipop, So I had an idea instead of porting the whole rom, I have decided to port the applications, ui and framework to an AOSP rom(in this case cm12). props to haoyangw.

(rom is still in alpha and may not boot)So without further ado, here's the rom but first a disclaimer:

DISCLAIMER: THIS ROM IS STILL IN ALPHA AND MAY NOT BOOT SO DO NOT BLAME ME FOR ANY BRICKED DEVICES YOU ARE CHOOSING TO DO THIS MODIFICATION TO YOUR DEVICE

Link:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1GT7O5RajNnanJaYW45TFBqSzA/view?usp=sharing
[Redmi Note Android Development] _LLJY:
Please post logs too thanks
[Redmi Note Android Development] OldYellowBricks:
No offense but I honestly think this is pointless because cm12 is still partly buggy and camera doesnt work. Youre better off doing this when cm12 is in a better state because things might change from the current cm12 build and youll have to start over again lol.

This rom might end up being buggy because of a buggy rom base and not the patch rom stuff.

But thanks for the effort and time youve put on this.
[Redmi Note Android Development] s@j:
Now the cm 12.1 build is almost stable and why don't you resume your project.

Cos miui apps are cool :)
[Redmi Note Android Development] lulzsec3639:
Thanks

Nice Post