yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus One Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] No.29:
problem solved, thx guys

my damn usb cable was the reason why fastboot did not change to fastboot usb :)

new cable, no probs :)

yay!!!!

hope anybody can help me....

my Google NexusOne is not running any rom

if i start the phone its starting 1-3 secs as normal than it stucks by the anDROID logo...

but if i start into the bootloader mode/fastboot - i can`t start recovery cause the phone restarts after that in the bootloader mode.´again...

if i plug in the usb cable - theres only FASTBOOT MODE but not the fastboot-mode USB

with the result that i can`t flash any boot.img or custom rom by adb/fastboot console

if i want to do anything by ADB-console/cmd-console the computer can`t not find my devices

:(

who can help me....thx so many for your attention....
[G2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chandidas:
I want to clear all the unwanted folders from my LG g2 without wiping my ROM, is there any such option. There are 2 many folders, i want it to be in the original state with ROM installed
[G2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wulsic:
Just do a factory reset or wipe internal storage if you are using custom rom and you will be fine, to be sure backup the rom/system first if something might go wrong, you may never know.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn LG-D802 met Tapatalk
[Paranoid Android Q&A] htcprox:
Hey guys,

i just flashed the PA 5.1 Rom in my HTC One M8.

The Rom is based on 5.1.1 Lollipop and marked as stable.

So far I only discovered that the double tap to wake up gesture won't work.

For everyone else here is how I fixed it.

The SeLinux mode setting was Enforcing or strict so I couldn't get the Gesture working.

I downloaded the SELinuxChanger from XDA and changed the setting from enforcing to permissive and now everything works fine!

I'm not responsible for any changes you make. Its only a guide and it works for me.
[Paranoid Android Q&A] htcprox:
Thread for Selinux Mode Changer

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2524485
[LG Optimus 3D] kost77:
Hi I bought a used LG optimus 3D.

It has a custom rom Thiaiz O3D GB V2.7.1 with kernel 2.6.35.7 and android 2.3.5.

I want to remove the custom rom and go back to factory settings and not have a custom rom on it.

How I can do this?? I am ignorant about phones, so please help. :)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] OlinB:
Hello everyone:

I am a new (used) Galaxy Note 3 owner. I bought an LG G2 3 weeks or so ago, spent that 3 weeks studying, rooting, installing recovery and finally installing and tweaking Cloudy G2 ROM. Just as I got my G2 running flawlessly it slipped from my shirt pocket as I was grilling, bounced off the grill and landed face down on the car port thus smashing the screen to pieces. :crying: What a waste of time installing that cheap screen protector the previous evening.

Anyway, I found a great deal on a used Note 3 so I went ahead and bought that rather than another G2. So now, I need to update my Note 3 just like I did the G2. Since I am running short on time at the moment I just want to get some ideas on where to start. I do intend to read everything I can on XDA but some helpful tips would really assist me with getting this finished sooner rather than later.

So....Right now the phone has stock 4.4.2 loaded and the knox counter is not tripped.

Baseband version is:N900TUVUCNB4

Security Software Version is:MDF v1.0 Release 2.

I am not at all familiar with this security stuff so any tips here on what exactly this is would be most appreciated.

My goal is:

1. root the device

2. install recovery prefer twrp but cwm will do if necessary

3. install a good ROM (Preferably Lollipop based ROM)

4. I would like to have xPosed Framework support too if possible. Of course this depends on the ROM I presume.

I have heard that Samsung Note 3 is a real bear to root. Also that the Odin software can be dangerous. I have no idea if this is true or not so please help me here.

I was also wondering whether it would be best to root the phone while on KitKat, or upgrade to stock lollipop first and then start the root/recovery process.

I'd really really appreciate all the help I can get from anyone that has owned a note 3 and has already been all through this process.

Thanks...Olin
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] OlinB:
Oh well, no replies? Man this Samsung device is rather overwhelming what with all the various scenarios. I am thinking of going with temasek's Unofficial CM12.1, or DOMPOP, or maybe Darklord. But I am still completely unsure whether to upgrade to stock Lollipop before I start on the root/recovery/ROM project. I also need to read everything I can find on these 3 roms.

But please, if you have any comments on which of these 3 ROMS is the best for the note 3 and/or comments on the best root/recovery method then by all means point me in the right direction.

Thanks so much for any help at all.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] OlinB:
people just aren't as helpful around here as they used to be. Either that or not many use the note 3 anymore. But nevermind I figured it out anyway as I knew I eventually would.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] beegbear:
Hey!

I'm sort of in the same boat as you..

would appreciate some feed back see this thread http://xdaforums.com/note-3-tmobile/help/nexus-4-to-note-3-questions-t3173473

Not sure if my jelly bean note is at its peak performance now.. it performs so well but i wanna upgrade for the sake of upgrading
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] OlinB:
Hey Beegbear:

I have decided to stay with KitKat for now because of the fact you can't use the xPosed framework on Lollipop and the fact KitKat is just a more stable platform and has many more Roms available. I used this page:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2765014

to get my Note 3 on the newest stock KitKat rom, then root it, then install the latest TWRP recovery. I carefully followed the exact steps in this guide except that I did use a newer TWRP recovery I downloaded from: https://dl.twrp.me/hltetmo/twrp-2.8.7.0-hltetmo-4.4.img.tar

Other than using this newer TWRP I went step by step through this guide. I still plan on installing a custom KitKat rom but right now I am researching various roms to try and decide which one. But at least I have latest stock, root, and a good recovery right now.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] ytj87:
I'd start with Tweaked. A flawless TW KK ROM. Only if unsatisfied would I bother with LP. Apparently the developer is working on an LP variant, but we'll see. He releases long after others, due to commitments, but well worth the wait. There is an xposed for LP available, but carefully research what modules work with it and compare to what you want.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] OlinB:
Thanks a lot. You caught me just before I was about to install Hyperdrive N3 RLS7.1. I'd like to ask you what you think of this ROM?

And as for tweaked, I have come across two possible versions of a "tweaked" ROM. Tweaked ROM [Material L Theme] and TweakedN3 v3.x. Are these actually the same ROM? I'm looking around but still am not sure on this.

Thanks for your reply.

Olin
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] OlinB:
Well I "think" I have it figured out and I am in fact going to go with the Tweaked ROM, basic install procedure. Thanks so much for your advice ytj87 - I would have installed that other ROM if I had not seen your post. I may do that down the road anyway but I intend to give Tweaked a thorough test before I do. It looks great and based on forum info it seems less buggy than most of the other roms I researched.

Olin
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note 3] ytj87:
Will probably come down to the experience you want. Tweaked is more stock with an emphasis on stability. I haven't used Hyperdrive, but when you see a ROM like that which integrates something other than the Note 3 TW UI, you're more likely to see glitches. It's the same NF9 base, though, and it has been around a while, and it looks interesting, so at some point give it a shot if curious. I personally prefer the Note 3 original UI to the S5's, so I probably won't try it.

TweakedN3 3.95. The LP themed one I haven't used.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] Hewlit:
Hello!

In the past days the wiki section of ROM upgrading was updated.

The method in wich you used MaUpgradeUt_noID.exe is now considered old school and not safe.

Now, for ROM upgrading, you have to use ROMUpgradeUt.exe wich you can find here:

http://xdaforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=36715&d=1176001960

The wiki explains very clearly what to do with the above archive and how to install/upgrade your Universal (Qtek 9000/SPV M5000/Dopod 900/O2 Exec/etc).

But there is something that might rise problems to new people like me.

In the Wiki (both at Radio upgrade and OS ROM upgrade) it is used a picture that shows the old MaUpgradeUt_noID.exe file.

Some users (like me) might not understand wich file to use:

the MaUpgradeUt_noID.exe or the ROMUpgradeUt.exe.

Also, i think in both sections (Radio Upgrade & OS ROM upgrade) should be more informations about what the status of Flight Mode should be before beggineing the upgrade.

And also if there is necesary to take out the SIM and the SD/MMC card.

Also, i think that many people have problems to understand if the custom upgrades are suitable for their devices.

for example, the Wiki section for SIM Unlock says that the method is suitable only for HTC Universal. I think that it is not very clear if the method works for

SPV M5000/O2 Exec/Dopod 900/etc too. (personally, i know that it is suitable). When i first read this section, i thought that the method only works for Qtek 9000.

There are some things that are not mentioned in the Wiki.

Like the fact that you should first unlock your device and only after that you should mess around with the ROM.

An other fact is that the first page of the Wiki contains a link "Upgrade Bootloader to 1.2". But if you fallow the link, you find out that you will upgrade the bootloader to 1.01 and not to 1.2.

When i first saw this, i thought that someone messed around with the Wiki and made a joke.

My final sugestion is that only Mods and Trusted Senior Members Should be allowed to edit/modify the Wiki.

For example, right now, as far as i understand, there are 2 identical sections of the Wiki refering to Radio Only Upgrade:

1.

http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=UNI_Radio

2.

http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=Radio only upgrade instructions

This is not bad. But what if someone (someone bad who bricked his device) comes and modifies the guidelines so that other users brick their devices too.

That's why i suggest that only Trusted users should be allowed to edit/modify the wiki.

I don't want to offend anybody with this thread. This is my opinion and i am open to sugestions. Please accept my apologies for my bad english. I am not an native speaker.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] mzalan:
True enough... The Wiki needs a major update, since many new "technologies" have surfaced(for example Jwmcpwright's(did I spell that right...?) ROM does not show the MaUpgradeUt_noID.exe or other files, it is one clean install package, an executable that will guide you through the upgrade), and some methods are being phased out, or have already been abandoned.

Also, other sections of the wiki could use an overhaul, maybe a guide on ROM cooking and/or building.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] jasonkruys:
If only selected people could update the Wiki, it wouldnt be a Wiki any more! Would kind of defeat the point IMHO
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] mzalan:
But not everyone here has the knowledge, technical specs, details, etc to wirte concise, detailed, accurate articles. Would you like to see wildly inaccurate entries concerning integral parts of your Uni? If someone without the programming knowledge, hardware skills, etc were to follow a procedure outlined in some bogus article, and bricked his PDA, who would be responsible?

Him, because he believed an article from a well-known trusted source(XDA-Dev) without any foreknowledge?

XDA-Dev, for allowing anyone to edit the Wiki, and post bogus?

Or the poster, for posting the bogus article for whatever reason, since anyone could freely edit the Wiki?

This is a question to be considered! I say only those should be allowed to post into the Wiki who have qualified themselves in the forum as having the knowledge to write accurate and detailed articles(Mods don't get appointed for nothing, in my opinion. AND they cooked virtually all the ROMs available here, so I think they qualify for updating...), since we're talking about pretty expensive(~$1,130/555 GBP/whatever currency) and important devices here.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] jasonkruys:
If people dont know what they are doing, they shouldnt mess about with such an expensive bit of hardware. I bet you trust all the articles in Wikipedia to be accurate? That is a Wiki - the whole point of a Wiki is that it contains the vast amount of knowledge from an almost infinite amount of people. The Wiki has a warning about the dangers of flashing a device with BETA roms. If an individual chooses to flash their expensive device, when they are absolutely not sure what they are doing, it is THEIR FAULT, no-one elses, and they are STUPID for doing it in the first place :confused:
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] mzalan:
I

do

trust articles in Wikipedia because I know that they are supervised by teams of moderators(although their presence is not so noticeable as it is here), who monitor articles, correct mistakes, and remove bogus articles. I've had articles deleted because they contained information deemed false(I've corrected the errors in my knowledge since then :p), so I know what they do, and I am grateful that they do it.

All right, let everyone edit the Wiki! But then you have to have a set of moderator-supervisors to ensure there are no inaccuracies. Let's count how many active members are there with the know-how to supervise a Software-Wiki: Lt.Cmdr.Ivan; Laurentius26; Beast0898; they are the ones who can be counted on as a "patrol", Jwrightmcps can probably be called upon(but he doesn't post too often...). They have cooked ROMs that are used by many many people out there, so they probably know what they are doing.

There are people out there, who took apart their devices, until they were picking at the individual chips from the mainboard, then put it back together to have it working without a hitch.

THEY

know what they are doing.

Now, suppose I put up an article that says "Hey, did you know, if you do this during an update, than this when it starts up, and finally you write this into these files, your Uni will triple its speed, and will never hang,

PLUS

, you get to connect to secured Wifi networks(an inability shared by most ROMs available...)!". Some new user John Doe comes along, no programming skills, first ROM-upgrade, and says "Hey, this guy knows what he's doing, let's follow his advice!" BANG! 1 bricked Universal, coming right up.:eek:

Now who's to blame? Me, the site, or the new guy?:confused:

When I upgraded my Uni for the first time a month ago, I didn't know what I was doing, I was placing my $1000+ device into the hands of Jwrightmcps, cause he seemed like the sort of guy you could count on not to screw up the upgrade-guide.

But when I first came to this forum, I flamed a guy for calling the screen connector cable "Coaxial", because I knew coaxial cables as the cable you get TV on. Would you trust an article written by me, in this light? I wouldn't. And would have you trusted my articles before knowing this bit of info? I would have...

Now

do you see the risks of unmoderated editing? Hope this cleared my point up a bit.

And no need to overuse capitals, it makes you seem you're flaming...
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] DaVince:
Definitely the new guy.

The site says xda-developers, not xda-newusers.

Mods does not have all the time in the world to moderate everything.

A Wiki is a wiki... it's a means to share knowledge. A wiki is always partially innaccurate. It's up to you to do more research before believing something to be true. But if you're just too gullible, then this site isn't for you.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] mzalan:
My point exactly. If they are the only ones who may post, then there is no need for that, since only articles from trustworthy sources will be posted.
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] yj:
uhm, I might be asking a stupid question, but I have not found any Information about updateing Radio ROM or the OS and extended ROM when using Windows Vista. Is there any chance though?
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] jasonkruys:
Not really relevant to this thread...plent of information can be found here: http://xdaforums.com/search.php

You might also want to look here first, as you are a new user: http://xdaforums.com/announcement.php?f=357

Finally, welcome ;)
[JASJAR, XDA Exec, MDA Pro ROM Development] yj:
well I just found out and wanted to inform you, sorry.

so the information that might be added to the wiki is about the windows mobile synch usb driver for Vista so RUU works again. thanks
[Xperia Z2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vikrant7027:
Which one has best battery life? 4.4.2 4.4.4 5.0 or 5.1?
[Xperia Z2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mr.loverlover:
Kitkat is your answer.

Sent from Xperia Z2

Luckily not from an iPhone = Yesterdays technology at tomorrows prices
[Xperia Z2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Envious_Data:
I have to say with 6hrs being my avarage SOT with 5.1.1 its better than the 3hrs 5.0.2 gave me at times and the 4hr AVG that 4.4.4 gave me

however 4.4.2 always gave me 7hrs SOT
[Xperia Z2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vikrant7027:
You get this much better battery on 5.1 than 5.0? Strange!
[Xperia Z2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Envious_Data:
5.1 doesnt have as bad of a mobile radio drain issue compared to 5.0.2
[HTC One S] senselocke:
I'm running CyanogenMod 11-20141112-Snapshot-M12-ville on my unlocked, rooted, S-Off One S ville, but I've had this issue on literally every version of CM I've tried, as well as a few other ROMs (Liberty, Viper One S). I didn't have it on the Stock ROM, meaning something in the way Sense 4+ handled memory worked better. If I have a game (Tap Titans usually) running, and a screen shade running, the shade will stop and re-start every few minutes. If I have Maps open and Slacker running, Slacker will just kind of die off after a few songs. If I have Netflix running as Chromecast and a browser up front, Netflix will die if I don't give it attention every few minutes.

This isn't always the case--Tap Titans remains active and alive if I take a phone call, but if I send a text and switch back it has to re-start. I know this phone only has 1GB RAM, but since I know it worked under Sense, it can't just be hardware. There has to be a way to specify which apps I'd like to keep running or prioritize. I asked in #cyanogenmod and was told to "get a less crap phone", which is odd considering the entire purpose of CyanogenMod is bringing a better Android OS to phones.

I really don't want to go back to Sense--I have an intense dislike for the menu style, white backgrounds, and general klunkiness--just for this one issue. But it affects the total functionality of my phone. I can't use Navigation while running music in my car, or check my Calendar while on the phone, or play a game at night. How do I set an app to "run as administrator" or increase its priority, to use Windows parlance?
[HTC One S] Rapier:
In KK there was an option to "pin" an app so it's not killed by the memory manager/task killer. Unfortunately in LP, Google decided that memory management is so awesome that they took out this feature. It could be OK for modern phones with 2GB or more RAM but for older phones like ours it is not so good

Sent from nowhere over the air...
[HTC One S] senselocke:
I'm still on CM11, which is Android v4.4.4. I Googled "pinning" in Kitkat, and couldn't find the feature you're talking about. How does this feature work/how is it activated? Is there a specific term for it?
[HTC One S] Rapier:
Was some time since then, maybe I was wrong and it's not a feature of KK but of the launcher I was using... But I remember having a tab in the app drawer that showed me the running apps and I could lock them not to be killed by the memory managers (they show a lock on their icons if they were "pinned") . I have to remember what launcher it was tho... Was some time ago. It might work on LP also in that case. I used ADW Launcher, GOLauncher EX and Buzz Launcher during that time. Must be one of those I guess. Probably one of the first two, Buzz was good for it's themes not for the features...

Sent from nowhere over the air...
[One (M8) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] biohazzard9:
Ive found out i have poor quality when recoreding voice messages in deifferent apls like line facebook messanger, the mic quality is bad from both sides kf the conversation like kf saysome one sends me a voice message i hear it in bad quality

Ive changed to nu player and awesome player in dev options

Also in whatsapp and regualr calls its fine .

Im on viper one 4.3.0 kernel ,elemnetal x m8

S-on
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ashish.akc:
When i connect my phone to charger when it is switched off, there is no charging boot animation. when i installed another ROM it starts working but not in SOKP. so i was thinking if there is any way to change or add that to the rom. My phone is YU Yureka
[XDA Assist] myandroidhelp:
Hello Everyone!!

I have a GT-I9060 DS mobile (India) and I am getting the "firmware upgrade encountered an issue" screen since a few days. I tried Firmware upgrade using Kies, but it says that "The model information that you have entered cannot be verified". So upgrade the firmware from KIES is out of scope.

Request you guys to please me out with this. I am unable to start my mobile phone.

How do I install the firmware again and make the phone up and running?
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ayesure:
It seems like my Galaxy S6 from ThreeUK got a bit of water in it while cleaning. The phone was on while it happened and it continued working perfectly well for a while. After a few minutes the screen starting flickering, showing snow, discoloring (everything got pinkish). Now it sometimes works normally and sometimes doesn't which makes me think there could be some liquid stuck in it somewhere. The water damage indicator in the SIM slot has not been tripped (it's white). The phone seems to sometimes randomly restart (hasn't done that for a day now), but other than that, the touchscreen is responsive, only the screen seems to be blacked out and then suddenly come back to live. Any ideas of what I should do? It has been like this for over 24 hours now and I have been unable to turn it off.
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] otariq:
If the sticker isn't showing water damage and your warranty is still valid I would go with that route and contact Samsung. How exactly were you cleaning it where so much water got into it to screwed up the phone?
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] -JFK-:
Before send it to Samsung, put the phone (powered off) in a rice bag for a night or better 24h.

After that, it will be completely dry.

And then, send it for repair, because, if they found water in it, even if the water indicator is white, you warranty is voided.
[Lenovo A850] public3n3my:
As mention.
[Lenovo A850] irfanadli97:
Despite this model's age, too early man, too early.

JUST few months ago the source code for this phone has just released. So we have to wait a kernel update first then we proceed to even KitKat.
[XDA Assist] bhnood:
My phone does not Root. I Root root 4.0 Error 16322 King. I do not want the phone open the bootloader. There is a way to stay locked bootloader.

build number : 23.4.A.0.546

android version : 5.1.1
[XDA Assist] cam30era:
I would suggest posting your question in the specific Q&A Help thread for your device. One of the experts will help you. > http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2775411

Good Luck
[Galaxy Tab 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nar67:
any custom rom lollipop for T531 ?