yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xc-racer99:
Hmm, that is weird. I only have two more commits than the last iyahman build. One was to fix encryption, the other was a little bug related to dex-preopt (faster first boot).

Can you post the output of the commands "df" and "mount", taken from either an ADB shell or a Terminl emulator. Also, a data wipe might do the trick.

Which bugs are you talking about? On my variant, the only bug is slow 720p recording (plus the occasional Google Plays store error 491).

Also, this is a 5 year-old phone; it will never be a quad-core phone or have the performance of one. There is only so much software can do. Humberos (and iyahman) did an amazing job to get the performance to where it is.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Planzinho:
useful to speed up:

http://android-xda.blogspot.pt/2015/02/the-complete-optimization-guide-for.html?m=1

http://blog.burrowsapps.com/2014/03/what-android-apps-are-safe-to-remove.html
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] phil_greg2001:
Hi xc-racer99,

I have noticed the code size of the Service Google Play is 70 Mb in old release and with your the size is 103Mb ???

And the size of all apps are increased...

At the first boot the installation of the apps is very long... maybe this is the cause of the biggest size of apps ???

Thanks man.

:cool:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xc-racer99:
Well, the change in Google Play size is probably due to updates to it as the ROM doesn't include it....

And yes, the first boot is longer as I decided to change the ART flags a little bit. I thought it gave better performance. If you don't like it, then you can edit your build.prop, reversing the changes made in https://github.com/xc-racer99/andro...mmit/dce2baf20a857116de586946913fddff1843ec8c It also causes apps to take up a bit more space.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] phil_greg2001:
ART is not default ???
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xc-racer99:
No, ART is default! AFAIK, its the only option :)

However, ART can be tweaked for each individual device. You can have a look at the Google documentation for it at https://source.android.com/devices/tech/dalvik/configure.html
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] phil_greg2001:
Hi xc-racer99,

I have verified in the iyahman release the build.prop is the same and the VM is ART but the apps are smallest...???

Have you an idea...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xc-racer99:
Alright, I have one more idea. If I recall correctly, there is one more commit that could have changed things and it is https://github.com/xc-racer99/andro...mmit/4db4c13c67d528fb743572a2779d01caa1839222 but this should only relate to the system apps. It could be that the build is just a bit odd for some reason. I can try another build if you want...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] phil_greg2001:
YES man :D

Many thanks in advance for your work.

:cool:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xc-racer99:
Ok, I tried a new build. This has the one (potential) problem commit reverted. It also has the newest Omni source and is built on different OS (Debian as opposed to Ubuntu)

It can be downloaded from https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24052804347820148
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] phil_greg2001:
I'm really sorry but it is the same thing...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] xc-racer99:
A pity, I don't know what else I can try....:crying:

If anyone has any brilliant ideas that I can try, let me know!

Edit: It could be the toolchain, you never know... Other than a newer Omni source, that's the only thing I did differently than Iyahman.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] althafvly:
Try tweaking kernal of the omni
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
I've just tried to build it on my computer, can someone try it and tell me if the problem with the gapps size is still present (or any other) ? Here is the link https://mega.nz/#F!zxxxhBJZ!s2muq6ZOWBK-aA4ACOC7zQ

I don't think it's a kernel problem, i've built it from the latest sources without any modifications and it's working just fine on my device.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] phil_greg2001:
When I install your Rom the verification signature failed... :eek:

Thanks man

:cowboy:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] althafvly:
Is there any way to get 417mb ram in lollipop?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
Um that's weird, try to re-download the rom and check the md5 on your computer before flashing it : you should get 78351ac5ef3447597c54fbec93e9a31a.

If it still shows the error just disable signature verification in your recovery.

---------- Post added at 06:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------

No, you can 'only' get 403 Mb of ram using the following commands in a terminal :

su
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/bigmem/enable
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] althafvly:
Does that support in other lp roms??

Other than iyahman's builds??
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
I'm not sure about it ... why not trying yourself ? ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] althafvly:
Ok

Thanks anyway. Is there any way to fix RIL in cm12 of jeffrey ?. Coz its so smooth.. ;)

Try if u can
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] qu4nt1n:
I enabled bigMem but it only increased my available Ram up to 403 Meg in Settings -> advanced settings! I believe that you will need to reboot afterwards for the change to take effect!

Moreover i am presently experimenting with another tweak: in Settings -> Performance -> Ram Settings (it's the last entry), i set the memory management to "very high"! From my understanding, as soon as android sense that the app you are currently using (the one in the foreground) will likely run out of RAM, the OS will more aggressively, but silently and gradually crash every app that uselessly squats the RAM in the background!

Feel free to try!

With all these tweaks in place, my phone feels a tad snappier, but it's nothing like a game changer!

At this point, the only game changer i can think of is to change phone altogether! :p

Addendum:

For those who did not yet take the hint, i strongly advise you to take advantage of the Xposed app, to add very useful functions to your phone at almost no noticeable cost in terms of performance as far as I can see!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
Guys, i've successfully built omni kernel with smartassV2 and lulzactive CPU governors, is someone Interested ?

Edit: Kernel is up here : https://mega.nz/#F!zxxxhBJZ!s2muq6ZOWBK-aA4ACOC7zQ. The zip isn't signed so you have to disable signature verification in your recovery to flash it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] faorekh:
Yes. please, I'm very interested.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] althafvly:
Cool. Can u add fast charging too
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
Yes i can .... if you give the the source code

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:20 PM ----------

New kernel uploading, i've added fast charge, more governors and i've compiled it with a new toolchain
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] althafvly:
Hey .can u please upload to other than mega host
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
http://www42.zippyshare.com/v/prvQi7Ca/file.html

I wont update this link
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] althafvly:
cool bro

thanks anyway. Is this supports bigmem?. And fast charge is need to enable?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
yes & yes, you can enable fast charge in the performance menu
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] jupiter5700:
Could you add XLbigmem and UltraBigmem support to kernel?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
Honestely i would love to but i don't have the libraries :crying: I've looked into the source of devil kernel but without sucess ....

If someone know where they are located , pm me pls
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] althafvly:
Yes. I using your modded kernal now.

Why dont u make a new kernal thread. ;)

Others may not seeing this. Because its in this thread.

Also i will inform if i get bigmem ultra source :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
Yeah good idea, i'll do it right now and thanks man :good:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Domnesu:
Who can give me ramdisk ? ramdisk.cpio,ramdisk-recovery.cpio
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Coldwindofnowhere:
https://mega.nz/#F!zxxxhBJZ!s2muq6ZOWBK-aA4ACOC7zQ it should be uploaded in a few seconds
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] faorekh:
Deaк Coldwindofnowhere!!

What is the different beetween Kernel.zip and Kernel_A8.zip?
[Motorola Atrix HD] leohuberman:
I've dropped my phone (ATRIX HD) and now it isn't turning on. The thing is when I connect to charger it shows the green light and start to boot (motorola logo appears) but then it keeps restarting forever. I've read that to solve this you enter fastboot mode and do some modifications. The problem is that I'm unable to enter fastboot when the phone is connected to the pc instead of the charger. Since the power button broke it gets even harder because I have to use a mini screwdriver to press it (and it is very hard to press the volume down at the same time also). So, is there any other way to pass the files needed for recovery or to enter fastboot mode? Thanks!
[Palm Treo 750] gtz_merlin:
Hello , you need original update for Palm, treo 750V ( brand Vodafone Italy )

( Settings - About - Phone - Version TREO750V-1.12-VFI . )

Version Update 1.15-VFI ? or 1.16-VFI not found in pages palmone Italia .

Thanks

Gtz
[Ascend Mate 7 General] paulopais:
adb shell wm density DPI && adb reboot .. change DPI between 320 - 480
[G 2014 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] leonardo186:
Dear all,

I'm new to xda and to ROM tweaking and changing, but I am a developer and I know Linux very well.

I'm trying to restore the factory 4.4.4 ROM on my XT1068 because I can't live with Lollipop even if I tried for weeks.

The factory images are posted in this thread http://xdaforums.com/moto-g-2014/orig-development/original-motorola-firmware-collection-t3153533 and I followed the instructions there and other instructions as well with no success so far.

What I tried, after rooting the phone and unlocking the bootloader has been:

- flashing according to http://xdaforums.com/moto-g-2014/general/restore-to-stock-t2873657 using fastboot commandline from my laptop

- trying to install with TWRP

Attempts with fastboot commands were a total failure and only lead me to bricking the system multiple times. Apparently the signature is not accepted so some of the fastboot flash steps miserably fail and brick the system.

Attempts with TWRP to install or wipe and install (also disabling the signature check otherwise it gets stopped by that) bring nowhere, with TWRP just telling that there was an error flashing right after checking the md5sum. By the way: there was no md5sum on the files in the original thread, so I created my own one (with the risk of having wrong md5 if the download was corrupted).

After hours spent on this the only thing I think I figured out is that lollipop bootloader is a nightmare and prevents me from installing 4.4.4. I can't figure out how you guys managed to install without complaints the 4.4.4 images. BTW: the 5.0 image I had on the smartphone was the RETGB one and it was bought over amazon, originally shipped with 4.4.4

P.S: the error I get with fastboot is: preflash verification failed
[G 2014 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] reefuge:
must have unlocked bootloader via motorla page and try my 4.4.4 easy installer http://xdaforums.com/moto-g-2014/general/windows-tool-moto-g-2014-xt1068-dual-t2983295- read the README for instructions -firmware d in list for GB from amazon UK
[G 2014 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] inFiniTyz_Z:
My friend, if you wanna upgrade your Android OS, please do it NOT(!!!), then flash a Factory Image from XDA on your phone.

It results in a hard brick if you upgrade via OTA.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] justnspace:
As we come closer to October, it's always fun to speculate!

Would you rather have the LG Nexus 5 or the Huawei made Nexus 5?

here's a re-cap on the "rumored" specs so far:

LG Nexus 5:

- Snapdragon 808 processor

- 4GB RAM

- 5.2 inch display

- 2700mAh battery.

Huawei Nexus 5

- Snapdragon 810

- 3500mAh battery

-5.7 inch display

- likely 4GB of ram

so, yeah...which one would you choose?

-Justnspace
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MikeFoxclaw:
Definitely LG.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rohit25:
Would prefer the one coming with 820.... 808 is weak in graphics and 810 is heater which becomes a oven in India.... ??
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iamterence:
Definitely the LG. Since these phones are kinda being seen as "sequels", the Hauwei Nexus is just too damn big for me, same exact reason why I don't want an N6. The LG model seems like it's gonna be the perfect update to an already capable design.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ConorCX:
Would like the future LG Nexus to have at least 3000mAh battery. Might go with the Huawei if it is only 2700.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Srandista:
LG all the way...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] [hfm]:
LG without question.

I'd rather just get the N6 if it ends up being that Huawei. Actually, I would just keep my N5 2013 at that point..
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] XeLLaR*:
LG did very well with the N4 and N5-13...so why not again.

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 5 mit Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bitdomo:
LG without doubt
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] justnspace:
Interesting results so far.

I am happy with the way LG handled the nexus 5 2013 and will likely not stray away from them in 2015.

LG all the way!

(I S hold have done a poll)
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DummyPLUG:
I will just avoid anything with 810
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] frigidazzi:
Where did you hear it will be the 810? I've only heard rumors of 820.

That a side I would prefer the lg unless like others mentioned that is the battery size then I'll give the huawei a shot. Also depends on other things too. Speaker placement, wireless charging, price. Ect
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AndyYan:
LG for damn sure. Nexus 4 have already served me well for 2 full years, and Nexus 5 as a backup device also gave me a nice impression. It just feels like Nexus should be made by LG by now... especially since no one else got it "righter" than LG :)

Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM12.1

[WARNING: XDA Premium 4.0.13+ lacks Signature function - do not update]
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] and313:
I dont know if 808 is such a good decision considering that the g4 has it and lg is planning to release a 820 version already later this year. I dont know.. I would rather have the 810 or 820 which really is a jump
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] justnspace:
remember, these are all just Rumored specs. All three companies(google, LG, Huawei) have been silent

even if Huawei releases the 820 (I heard the chip is coming out in Dec. so, it wont be in phones till at least summer '16) it looks as if most people would still choose the LG made Nexus.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] refedit:
I loved my N5. but I had to switch to LG G4 because of speaker/sound quality. I need all day long to talk on phone and it became really anoying after couple minutes the poor sound.

But the N5 support on developement is great and esteticly I loved it.

So I'm really excited about the new N5.

I just hope it wont be equiped with SnapDragon 810 because of overheat. Where I live in summer it's about 40 degrees, so... you know :p

Ans for sure, I hope LG will release it!!!!! LG all the way!
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Evo_Shift:
Wow, look at those poll results, lol. After using the Nexus 6 for a couple months and never really enjoying it I am waiting for a smaller phone. Even 5.5 is too big. I am hoping a 5.2" LG will feel similar to the current Nexus 5.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] migueldbr:
This big phone trend is completely idiotic, its like no manufacturer scans the market to see what people want. The sweet spot for most people is 4.7-5.0 (more or less). Yet they keep making phones too ****in big and give no alternative, its just plain stupid. They just release the "mini" versions, completely idiotic cripled versions of flagship phones, overpriced. Sony is the only one who has some sense about this, but their prices are way too high.

If any brand like lg or sony or htc made a flagship phone with a good cpu, a 4.7 inch screen(or maybe even 5.0 with reduced borders) 1080p, 2 or 3gb ram, a good 3000mah battery and a price point of around 350 euros or something, it would probably become the top selling phone in little time. But no, lets make them all 5.5 or even bigger and always with some flaw to keep the consumer from buying it lol.

True that some people like big phones, but most people dont...I dont understand why manufacturers cant figure this out honestly...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] frigidazzi:
With the exception of battery you described three nexus 5. Or z3 compact (and it's not selling that much) I want the same size screen as nexus 5, but definitely more than 2gb of ram. 3 minimum, but would like 4 so the phone could last more than a year.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] migueldbr:
you just reinforced my point. Nexus 5 flaw: battery.

Why couldn't they just stick a better battery on it, even if it increased the price a bit? I like my nexus 5 very much but i hate battery life on this phone and will probably exchange it for a better alternative(hopefully the new 5.2 nexus if it comes with good battery life)

the z3 compact isnt selling much because its price is way too high. Put its price around 250 euros (which would suit given the specs it has) and it would sell like a flagship phone. It was actually one of my choices before the nexus 5. But when i saw the price asked for it...way too high and went for the N5 instead

btw i would rather have 2gb ram with a good battery than 3 or 4gb with a crappy one...since manufacturers always want to cut costs i would prefer they would not cut on battery
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rbs_uk:
I don`t get it why Google is making such an ugly phone with low specs. Yes it might be cheap, but I would rather pay more for premium product. I waited so long for Next google phone and so pissed off now - its crap - design is like from 2000 not 2015.

What other "5 phones are out there which can be rooted and installed with lean/pure Android?
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chrsada:
How is 820 current when there is not a single phone already launched with it? We are not going to see any device shipping with that for another 4-5 months at least.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hussan882:
The front - well maybe, below link also mentions it coming in 64GB :)

http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/135...-company-slide-showing-the-lg-made-smartphone

[IMG="LG Nexus 2015"]http://cdn.pocket-lint.com/r/s/970x/assets/images/php4cllwe.jpg[/IMG]
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thebobmannh:
Why don't you then? Would love to see what you find that you're happy with (spoiler alert - nothing). :rolleyes:
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] iamterence:
Google did that last year with the N6.

Didn't quite work out like they'd hoped.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rbs_uk:
Because they all are full of ****/bloatware - I want pure Android, rooted and all apps I don`t use uninstalled - like my current Nexus 5.

If you tell me which phone can be installed with pure Android - I would be grateful.

---------- Post added at 19:01 ---------- Previous post was at 19:00 ----------

N6 is not 5", but huge brick with 6" screen.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thebobmannh:
You dont' seem to understand.

Google had a success with the N5 because it was an inexpensive, middle-of-the-road (NOT top-of-the-line) device. They tried to do what you want with the N6, and it was not nearly as successful. So they're doing the N5 2015 the same way they did the N5. Unassuming looks (why people care so much about what their phone looks like, as if they're all not just rectangles with glass on the front, is BEYOND me), good but not top-of-the-line specs (but pretty close by pretty much any measure) and an affordable price. Of course, since none of this is official from Google, there may be differences from the rumors, but...

Your ridiculous post saying the N5 (rumored) is an "ugly phone" (subjective and silly) with "low specs" (not even remotely "low", considering it's using a top-of-the-line processor, memory size, display, etc that every other phone is using right now) is just the whining of someone who would never be happy. Buy any phone you want, root it, and install CM12. Boom, stock Google with none of the bloatware. Otherwise? You have to accept the limitations of the Nexus platform. Google doesn't design phones for one guy ,they design them to have the MOST people buy them. A super-expensive "top-of-the-line" phone is not part of that mission.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rbs_uk:
There is no CM for Galaxy S6 for example.

http://download.cyanogenmod.org/
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] -SmOgER:
Talking about design, sometimes 'plain' on paper design is the hands down best approach and they absolutely nailed it with 2013 Nexus 5. I mean, it's one of the best looking android smartphones out there IMO. It's modern, solid and clean with beautiful front to back transition without any useless buttons and oversized speaker holes. You cant quite say the same now about the new nexus 5 can you...
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] thebobmannh:
The IMO is pretty crucial there. I've only seen the OnLeak leaked pictures, they look perfectly fine. I'd much rather "oversized speaker holes" if it means "front-facing speakers I can hear." I'm a klutz and put my phones in cases, always, so I could really not care less about the "front-to-back transition."
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] m52 power!:
I just wish they went with the 810 which supports ddr4 memory. 808 = ddr3. When the 2013 N5 came out it had the latest processor and has really held up performance wise for 2 years. When I buy a phone I know I'll be using it for that full term (2 years), I'm not one of these gadget wizards that has a new phone every 6 months or even less.

Looks wise I'm fine with it, it'll probably look fantastic in person.

I'm hoping on official release the specs are better but with so much mutual leak info it's bit looking too good.

Realistically I could use the og N5 for another year and probably not be missing out on much, still today it has epic performance and always the latest Android version.
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] alen1901:
The only problem with cheap is that there are budget cuts on phones important hardware. Take a look at n5, it has a really bad mike (water effect and recordings in louder areas), weak speaker, vibrator is kinda strange too, smaller battery. Compare it to its counterpart g2, bigger battery, better mike, louder speaker and cleaner sound.. I better vote for high end components and 100$-200$ more expensive phone. It would also last longer in future. When snapdragon 820 comes in Q1 2016, 808 will be a peace of crap, hell, even now its not that much better then 805. Thats why im dissapointed. When next nexus phone comes, 820 will be in every single phone, nexus will come the latest and probably even pass by improved 820 (like qualcom did with many its cpu's). I might skip nexus this year just because of that cpu.

Sent from Pure Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DigitalUnderground:
That link is junk aside from the picture. It will be 3GB RAM with 16/32gb and the 808. Lol pocket-lint. They use cool words like "should" and "could" lol

Who cares about broken ass CM? Really? They haven't made a truly stable rom since CM7 lol. Every single thread u see that has CM is buggier than Minnesota on a lakeshore in the summertime