[Verizon Motorola Droid Turbo General] Semseddin:
With that logic, Moto Maxx should have gotten 5.1 before moto x 2013 since it is a 1.5 years newer device than moto x 2013. I don't see a fine logic with that. All i see here, motorola never seemed to care about the QUARK family of device and its users. If they did, they would have kept their promise of an early os update after the release of the device for the Turbo. Now i am going to dig history as it seems a good place to talk about it.

If you expect me to believe that motorola considers its customers being valuable, i am a customer and you never made me feel that i was valuable. Here are my reasons.

We made a request in motorola forums and never read even a reply let alone a solution from your side. This is the value that you showed us back in the day.

https://forums.motorola.com/posts/972df39945

Here are some other examples of your value degree to your "valuable" customers. :mad:

Atrix 4G on At&t ; was promised to updated to ICS and after a year of its announcement, it was cancelled and motorola tried to sell those atrix 4g guys newer devices for 100$ cheaper. What a cheap move.

Motorola RAZR XT910 retail ; It was officially announced that the retail non branded xt910 phones would offer unlockable bootloader. Guess what happened ? We could never unlock our bootloaders and motorola sold an imaginary " xt910 developer edition " device. I mean imaginary because it was never existent in the market. What a cheap mover from motorola again. Isn't it ?

Milestone XT720 retail ; It was sold with 2.1 eclair and never got updated to Froyo 2.2 while its cousin named MOTOROI sold in Korea got updated to 2.2. Even the Canadian Bell operator pushed an OTA for their XT720. Yeah, that was an OTA which was made out of a custom rom made by an XDA dev. You see the difference in ethics? Motorola who produced the phone and made money out of it, doesn't even update their "valuable" customers' phones but a small canadian mobile network updated their valuable customers' XT720 even if they didn't give any promise.

Droid 3 on Verizon ; It was born with android 2.3 and it died with android 2.3. The reason was it didn't have enough ram to run ICS. A cheap lie again because LG updated their P920 Optimus 3d, a device with the exact same specs of droid 3 ( omap4430 1ghz and 512mb ) got updated to ICS eventually. However motorola never bothered to update "valuable" DROID 3 customers devices.

Photon 4G on Sprint ; It sold well and motorola announced they would update the device to ICS. After a year, they announced that they will not. Phone born with 2.3.4 and died with 2.3.5 , lol not even 2.3.6, pathetic. Guess what, they tried to sell newer moto devices for 100$ cheaper to Photon 4G guys. Motorola playing the same cheap game again.

Droid Bionic on Verizon ; You made the guys wait for a year and finally updated their phones with a bogus OS just to let them buy newer devices from you.

Atrix HD on AT&T ; It was born with ICS and updated to 4.1.1 and later it was announced that 4.4 Kitkat update was going to be ready for Atrix HD "valuable" customers. A month ago, motorola announced they will not update ATrix HD to Kikkat and they tried to play the same disgusting game again by trying to sell their newer devices to Atrix hd owners for 100$ cheaper. What a shameful business practice is this, i can not even name it.

Atrix 2 on AT&T : It was born with 2.3 Gingerbread and got updated to ICS after quite a long time, later it was announced that they wouldn't update Atrix 2 to Jelly Bean. It had the same hardware with Droid Bionic & Droid Razr which was eventually got updated to 4.1 Jelly Bean. Again, motorola cared so good about their " valuable " customers. Other worldwide market atrix 2's got stuck with ICS as well like AT&T atrix2. However Motorola China team pushed a great OTA to 4.1.2 to their ATrix 2 variant.

If you want us to believe that we are valued, just keep your promises, do not lie to us, your valued customers. :good: