yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[X 2014 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wiiareonfire:
I'm having difficulty figuring out how to approach the update. I'm on the XT1095 running 22.21.11.victara_tmo.tmo.en.US, TWRP, and root. The only guides I've seen are supposed to update from 23.11.14.

Is the file here the right file? How do I return to stock properly?
[X 2014 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AGISCI:
Yes, on that page download the full 5.0 factory image. Then flash it to your phone. After that you will be on stock, unrooted, and factory recovery and can take the OTA. The OTA should appear when you look for updates on your phone after that, no need to sideload, well unless you want to, lol.
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] Soul Annihilator:
[YOUTUBE]46QAk6TxvRE[/YOUTUBE]

I'm not really sure what's wrong with my phone. Anyone? This just started happening recently and I'm worried it might get worse.
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] shadovraven:
First of all, did you make a hard reset after upgrading to lollipop? Did you had that problem on kitkat?
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] Soul Annihilator:
I just upgraded to Lollipop recently, and I remember I already had this problem in Kitkat, shortly before I upgraded to Lollipop. I did a factory reset when I upgraded to Lollipop but it's still there. So I'm worried that this could be a hardware problem.
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] shadovraven:
Well, I had the same problem (which occured very rarely but still) on lollipop. Never had this on kitkat so this might be a hardware problem. Do you experience this on phone just after factory reset? With phone being pretty much fresh ?
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] Soul Annihilator:
Yes I still experienced after factory reset. Do you think my phone will die anytime soon? :(
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] shadovraven:
It's difficult to predict actually. Do you still have a warranty for your Z Ultra? If you do, you could return it for repairs. If you don't I woudn't worry about it.
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] Gamer4Life:
Try to flash your phone with flashtool, but backup ur data in case it doesnt cure your problem

Tell me if that helps.
[Sony Xperia Z Ultra] trylestarikp:
NFC error after update to 5.1.1

Hey.. After update to 5.1.1 I found a bit problem here. My NFC in Xperia Z ultra keeps turned ON whereas I didn't turn it ON. When I check it on setting the NFC icon is in off conditions but aftet check it in power management the NFC drained my batteries so fast. And it's sadly to know. Is there anyone counter same problem with mine or it just me?

Thanks and regards.

:crying:
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ryuvann:
Hi everyone,

I just switched from iPhone to android and so far so good, have the S6. The one issue though is with the lock screen and notifications as I find they work weird compared to iPhone. There's 2 issues I'm having:

1) Using the Samsung lock screen right now, tried some others but none seem any better. The issue I have is for example someone might comment on Facebook, so a notification appears on the lock screen, fine. I get an email, same thing, get someone adding me on twitter, it works as expected. The problem is that if I go on my laptop and read those notifications on Facebook.com, or on Twitter.com, Outlook etc, they don't disappear from the lock screen or the notification bar on the phone. On the iPhone if you opened it elsewhere, they would disappear right away from the phone. So I'll have my phone constantly showing like 5 new emails, even though they are long gone and I have to actually dismiss the notification for it to go away. It seems like it doesn't do it automatically. Is that just how android works or is there a better lock screen for this?

2) When I had the Nexus 5 previously, on that lockscreen you could just double tap on a notification and open right to it. That doesn't work on this lock screen, you have to tap it then swipe to unlock which doesn't always work. More importantly though on the Nexus 5 it seemed like I could interract more with the notifications on the lock screen, like pull down on them for reply options etc, but I don't seem to really get that on the S6. Swiping down doesn't usually do anything, and it only seems to show 2 or 3 notifications as bars, and then the rest are tiny icons under it.

So not sure if this is all normal or if there's something better I can do or use? Number 1 is more my issue, I feel like I've taken a step back in time, where the phone and computer aren't talking to each other. iPhone I never had to do that as much it seems so not sure if there's a better lock screen or something.
[E 2015 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] showofdeth:
Can't seem to find any information anywhere about the uk 5.1! Can anyone tell me what's up or where to look?
[ONE General] OldDroid:
AOSP is comming the next days ...

ATM - just RIL and NFC are broken, WiFi works, BT works, Camera works, Audio works. Rest is untested ...

Settings are broken aswell, thats why i was unable to take a screenshot of the Device Info Settings ;)

After build has been published i start working on M developer preview ^^

View attachment 3379593

View attachment 3379597

View attachment 3379596

View attachment 3379598
[ONE General] dnle71:
I don't fully understand this post but, I love AOSP based ROMs!
[ONE General] OldDroid:
its just an announcement of an upcomming clean aosp ^^ wanted to share my progress
[ONE General] fermasia:
Thanks for sharing. Considering xda's spirit you could share your source and share with us what are you porting thid from, and other details.
[ONE General] jamal2367:
Excellent :) i love AOSP..like nexus devices!!
[ONE General] black.ic3:
Thank you dude! Finally someone managed to do this

But what is it? 5.0 or 5.1?
[ONE General] Aka91:
Waiting.. Really excited. AOSP is ♥.
[ONE General] OldDroid:
5.1 :o

for those wanting to help me testing, contact me.

i sold my opo for the same price i bought it, to buy the oneplus two next month ;) (400€ i hope :P)

i still want to continue my work, but need some reliable testers ^^
[ONE General] YudmudTR:
If it is pure AOSP, I want to test/help it.
[ONE General] sseuorosal:
i love AOSP..like nexus devices!!
[ONE General] lokesh.3440:
I'll help you in testing. PM me once the build is ready. I love AOSP ROMs
[ONE General] OmegaBlaze:
Pm me if you need a tester?
[ONE General] :
Marker
[ONE General] brandonhatty:
I guess I don't understand either. Aosp has been on Bacon for a while now. Tesla is using aosp nexus 6 base. It's tweaked out and supports layers but built on aosp base. Is this something newer?
[ONE General] Heisenberg:
What's the issue? Wouldn't it be a good thing to have more than one aosp based ROM for this device?
[ONE General] brandonhatty:
There is no issue. Just asking a question. I don't know everything. Didn't know if this was different or new?
[ONE General] :
He doesn't even have this device. Why is a marker thread being allowed by an RD
[ONE General] OmegaBlaze:
Facts✔

I could have sworn this wasn't allowed...
[ONE General] Heisenberg:
Not facts at all. This is true for the development sections, but he's posted this in general.
[ONE General] jamal2367:
Any news ? I really love pure AOSP without modification....
[ONE General] abhibnl:
Afaik, there's no proper AOSP rom for opo at all. Really looking forward to this one.

Sent from OnePlus One
[ONE General] Bobbi lim:
Isn't OxygenOS based off AOSP?
[ONE General] jamal2367:
Yes!
[ONE General] abhibnl:
Isn't that based on pure CAF rather than AOSP? Or am i confused here?
[ONE General] jamal2367:
OxygenOS is AOSP based (pretty much stock).

CM12 is based on CM and has more customizability.

http://www.whatsontech.com/2015/02/02/oneplus-announced-aosp-based-android-rom-called-oxygen-os/
[ONE General] abhibnl:
I know about CM bro. I know it's based on AOSP +CAF +CM's own implementations but the hardware part(HALs) is pure CAF on Oxygen OS. That's the only difference. Oxygen OS kernel is purely based off CAF sources while CM makes their own changes to the HALs and libs.
[ONE General] jamal2367:
Ok bro... What is the different from non-CAF and CAF ?

Regards

Jamal Bassal
[ONE General] abhibnl:
See CAF is what comes directly from Qualcomm. The CPU and hardware optimizatied libs/HALs for QC chipsets, they are all present on CAF. CM is based on CAF sources and they do their own modifications. Then there are non-caf based roms such as Omni/Slim who build their roms based on AOSP sources and libs etc. I'm no expert here so i believe some experienced person could shed more light on it. I believe as of now only Omni is based off AOSP sources with device tree and other parts taken from CM because Oneplus themselves don't provide any device tree.
[ONE General] vikas776:
R u allive or dead OP.

just checking :D
[ONE General] OmegaBlaze:
Dead.. Dude doesn't even own oneplus one.
[ONE General] abhibnl:
Well compiling a pure AOSP roms is surely not that easy and the other thing to consider here is he doesn't own bacon. So that adds to the difficulties.

i woun't say dead. But not having the device is surely a kind of blind and difficult development.
[ONE General] Luc.Nex:
He is not obliged to develop a rom whether he has the phone or not,and sometimes real life catches on.
[ONE General] :
Well, he also wasn't obliged to make this marker thread.
[ONE General] Luc.Nex:
This was discussed before..

It's allowed since it was posted in the general forum not in the development forum.

So no harm was done as he was just sharing a progress he made..Whether he is maintaining his progress or not is his own and whether this thread is allowed or not is the forum moderators thing..so all i'm saying is not to flame the guy.
[Windows Mobile Development and Hacking General] lubbe:
Hi, I have downloaded this program for my Hermes with Schaps Hermes_WM6Pro WWE_3.30c rom.

It works great for skype and sip from 1 single program.

Take a look at: www.fring.com

To learn how to use fring including how to upload all of your Skype, MSN Messenger and Google Talk contacts.
[Windows Mobile Development and Hacking General] jockyw2001:
Works nice technically, but I won't sell my soul to them. All your VoIP accounts are exposed to Fring and all VoIP traffic is tunneled through them. Perhaps they are a NSA subsidiary?
[Windows Mobile Development and Hacking General] Menneisyys:
Check out http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=315654 for a FULL review of Fring.
[G4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] maff1989:
Good day all,

I'm having an issue getting an "LG VPN" connection working. I add all of my details properly, and it saves without warning. I tap the newly added VPN connection, I am prompted to input my XAUTH credentials. When I tap connect, I get the following error message: "Invalid or unsupported preshared key". Does anybody know why this might be?

I've searched online but have not come up with any positive results in my research. The Basic VPN works for me to get connected, but as soon as I leave that VPN page and go back in, the connection entry is gone. The LG VPN connection persists which is why I'd prefer to use it.

Thank you in advance for your help!
[G4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kyle1867:
That's interesting...what's your logcat look like when trying to connect? Any errors or suspicious entries logged on your VPN server?

Also would be helpful to know the config details on the server side.
[G4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] maff1989:
Nothing in LogCat. On the VPN side it shows nothing in the connection logs, as if the LG VPN entry on my phone didn't even attempt to initiate the connection.

I'm thinking it may be a bug in the LG VPN implementation. My phone is fully up-to-date and I'm using the stock ROM that came with the phone, no root or anything special like that.

Just to give a little more info, my LG VPN connection profile is configured like this:

- IPSec connection type: Pre-shared key (IKEv1)

- Gateway: my VPN server

- PSK: <blank> (after saving the connection entry with the PSK and going back into "Edit", it shows blank like it didn't save my edit)

- Advanced options: set with IKE and ESP proposals consistent with configuration on my VPN server

I've tried messing with the checkboxes like "Aggressive mode" but no difference.

Server-side VPN config (StrongSwan). This works with the "Basic VPN" connection on my G4:

conn remote

left = vpn_server_IP

leftsubnet = 0.0.0.0/0

right = %any

rightsourceip = 172.16.20.200/29

rightid = matthew-remote

keyexchange = ikev1

ike = aes128-sha-modp1536

esp = aes128-sha-modp1536

leftauth = psk

rightauth = psk

rightauth2 = xauth

auto = add

ikelifetime = 8h

lifetime = 1h

type = tunnel
[Galaxy Tab 4 General] Maxximo88:
Hi,

I'm not a Dev but I know there are lot of people interested in modding around Galaxy Tab 4 SM-T53X and other version too.

I decided to create this bounty topic of reliable people who want to donate to a Dev who port Ubuntu mobile on Galaxy Tab 4.

As you know, Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 mount a Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 quad-core 1.2GHz processor and 1.5GB RAM, so able to run Ubuntu Mobile. As You can see on

Ubuntu Wiki

, Ubuntu for devices is available to Galaxy Tab 7.7 (GT-P6800), Galaxy Tab 10.1 Wifi (

GT-P7510

), Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 (

p3110/p3113

), Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 GSM (p3100), Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 Wifi (P5110)....So please it's time to get it also on Galaxy Tab 4!

Want to partecipate? Write in comment how much you want to donate to any Dev could port Ubuntu Mobile to Tab 4, please write also your model (i.e. SM-T530).

Donations (26/06):

- Me, Maxximo88 20€ (SM-T530)

Total: 20€ (I will update it as soon as possible)

Once Ubuntu Mobile port is completed and posted we will wait for the dev or devs to specify how he/they want the money sent. Usually it is just a donation to their Paypal account or Bitcoin.

Current status:

Tag Developers so they are aware of this.

Ubuntu porting guide here:

-

Installing Ubuntu for devices

:)
[Galaxy Tab 4 General] Maxximo88:
I want to pay a beer to any Dev able to port Ubuntu Mobile on SM-T530!

I think some devs could be interested: [MENTION=4792450]h2o64[/MENTION] [MENTION=5197763]evilracer123[/MENTION] [MENTION=1644680]will89[/MENTION] [MENTION=4913180]jorgen_gustavsson[/MENTION] [MENTION=3589695]Starcarr[/MENTION]
[Galaxy Tab 4 General] h2o64:
Earning money to work on an open source project... Isn't that a paradox?

XDA is community projects where many people make one thing. I don't think your offer has to be considered
[Galaxy Tab 4 General] Maxximo88:
Hi, thanks for your reply and to show your point of view.

I just know that lots of Devs works hard and some people uses their works even without click on "Thanks button"..

So, maybe, this could be a new way to pay back the hard work of Devs..
[Galaxy Tab 4 General] :
H,

hi, i've been tinkering and failing with ubuntu touch for a bit now :confused:

would you be willing to run me through a step by step on the build ?

I guess my main question is, in the build am i only constructing a "base" device specific image and then

dumping in the pre-built system or is there a process for building completely that i'm missing ?

Also how do i generate the correct installation script [rootstock] for my devices ? sm-t530nu sm-t330nu

both are qcom/msm8226 caf-kernel [wifi-only, no fastboot but adb via recovery seems to do]

i attempted modifying a few different script script but the install fails.

Am i following the normal cm11 build pattern from lunch, [mka recoverimage, mka systemimage, etc.,] ?

thanks.

m
[Galaxy Tab 4 General] Maxximo88:
Hi,

sorry I really don't know how to help You, I'm just an user, not a dev.

I saw the new Ubuntu porting guide here:

-

Installing Ubuntu for devices

Maybe someone could help you..
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Big_Joe20:
Hi all, I'm new in this world, I was just using tasker and start seeing things that need rooted phones to work properly, and then I research and find a lot of new things that you can do with a rooted phone, so I started to research about it, I tried the "easiest way" the 1-click KingRoot, but didn't work.

So, I have been reading a lot of this in the threads, but I'm not sure if the CF works in this version of note 3 and android, and if it does work, what file should i use?, I know that I have to download all the drivers of KIES 3, put debugging usb, turn off the reactivate, use ODIN (I don't know what version), know how to put the phone in download mode (I think that's the name) but the problem is whit the rooting file, I don't know the difference of cf-auto-root, CWM, TWRP. I know that CF activate the KNOX, but I have more than one and a half year with my note 3 so I think won't be a problem the voiding warranty issue.

Also, I don't know what's the problem with the locked or unlocked bootloader and how to know that, I read in another post how to know your bootloader version with an app called Phone Info * Samsung, so this is the info I have:

Bootloader version:: N900W8UBU2DOE4

Base Band version: N900W8UBU2DOE4

PDA: N900W8UBU2DOE4

CSC: N900W8TCEDOE4

I don't know if this helps or not, but I put it just in case:

Kernel: 3.4.0-4992259

Compilation number: LRX21V.N900W8UBU2DOE4

I hope you can help me and sorry for the noob questions, I just don't want an expensive brick... :$
[Galaxy Note 3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Rosli59564:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2792819

All you need to know about n900w8
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NightOrchid:
Im trying to unbrand my M9. Ive followed the steps, have read the Back up and write only posts on XDA.

Ive only unlocked the bootloader so far through HTCDev, but when I come to flash TWRP, it says

"cannot write revovery in S-ON state", but I thought I had to Flash recvoery first, then S-Off

Im using twrp 2870=hima with SuperSU 2.49BETA.

Like I say, Ive only unlocked bootloader, nothing else.. phone is running fine

Any help please
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gffmac:
Flash recovery in download mode rather than bootloader and it should work fine
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NightOrchid:
Thanks friend, all sorted.. the guide said.. it was Bootloader mode,

Im just doing a full system backup before rooting... :)

wish me luck
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jollywhitefoot:
maybe you should try a different guide. Sounds like that one was maybe written for the M9?
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NightOrchid:
Ok so now my M9 boots up to desktop then keeps rebooting after i changed the CID to 001.

I can boot into recovery and twrp, but keeps rebooting

SORTED:

If this happens to you, do not panic... its not bricked or broken, My M9 had a CID: ORANG001, but when I changed it to HTC__001, it was bootlooping. According to the folks at sunshine live chat, this can happen when a carrier apps interferes with the particular CID... so just change it back to the original carrier cid.. and it works fine.... then try a different CID, or remove app from system through root.. but be careful of this..

cheers
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gffmac:
Set it to supercid 'fastboot oem writecid 11111111' and you will be good to go.
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NightOrchid:
I thought supercid stopped it from taking OTAs, besides if its an EE app causing it bootloop from the M9 desktop, will 401.8 not replace the ROM. therefore just set USB debugging, change CID in download mode, then just flash 401 from recovery without bothering with the bootloop.

Thanks
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gffmac:
Supercid allows you to use any rom from any network and shouldn't stop otas.
[One (M9) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] NightOrchid:
I just used HTC__001 anyway.. didnt bother booting into the OS, just jumped straight to download mode and flashed the WWE 1.32...

Anyway, Im all sorted and all up and running now on wwe 1.40.401.8

Thanks for all the help :)
[X 2014 General] Red_81:
I took the OTA update zip from my phone and modified the updater-script to look for:

This should allow the OTA to be sideloaded if you used the Motorola 5.0 Lollipop factory image that they recently published.

DISCLAIMER:

This is untested by me. I have no idea if it will work. Be sure you can return to stock if you need to. DO NOT flash this if your bootloader is locked!

Still here? Then if you want to be a guinea pig, you must be on the factory image from lollipop and the fingerprint must be motorola/victara_tmo/victara:5.0/LXE22.46-11/11:user/release-keys.

Url removed. Motorola has fixed the 5.0 images. Download them again.
[X 2014 General] alvareo:
Honestly I'd rather not do this. The check is there for a reason.
[X 2014 General] Red_81:
True. But Motorola hasn't been too good with their checks already. The only part that concerns me would be the sbl update at the end of the script.
[X 2014 General] walrusmonarch:
I think the official 5.0 image Motorola posted was put together in a rush or something. After I flashed it, the software status in the bootloader always showed: modified. When I didn't see the OTA popping up after checking for updates yesterday, I tried a logcat and it was spitting out errors about build fingerprint mismatch (that made sense), but also errors about root being present? I had not rooted after flashing the 5.0 image... The OTA was clearly available from Motorola's servers (I could see the download link and manually download it if I wanted). It was just determined to be incompatible, so the phone just kept saying software is up to date...

After flashing the previous 5.0 I had laying around, the software status showed as official in the bootloader as well.
[X 2014 General] Red_81:
Very good info. Sounds like they botched the build and now it's causing issues for everyone. I bet when they compiled the image they had something extra in the /system and that caused it to increment the build fingerprint and the status to show modified
[X 2014 General] stangman:
Anyone get this to work? Comes up invalid file for me.
[X 2014 General] AGISCI:
I don't think it will work. If I remember correctly otas need a signature, which only motorola has. Since it's a modified ota, the signature won't match.
[X 2014 General] colourfuldays:
Actually it will work. Chinese people had successfully modified ota of 5.0.2,he reduced BL's version and gpt's level. So if u flash that ,it would not update your BL version and also gpt level. because of this modified ota u can easily downgrade ~
[X 2014 General] AGISCI:
I just read up on it some more. We are both correct. Yes you can modify an ota file but if it is not signed by motorola it can only be used on an unlocked bootloader. Anyoneone that has a locked bootloader will not work.
[X 2014 General] adm1jtg:
In the other 5.1 thread they posted IMG files for everything but bl and gpt. I fastbooted just the system and boot files and now am on 5.1 may try the modem files at some point but didnt see a need so far. One disclaimer in the same thread i gave explicit directions to another user who said it didnt work at all but he was not on a pure edition and had a different bl version.

So why post all this here.... to agree with the above that with the script correctly modified it should work perfectly.