yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
So Minimal is the new king of speed. Good work keeping that updated.

The reason why I don't include SM-N900T or hltetmo in the script is because I plan to have TMO specific version. I only need feedback, is there any benefit in doing it, like would NFC start to work or something similar? Otherwise, I just wouldn't bother and make one unified build for all.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
I've used both in the past and didn't notice any differences. The only difference I see is that my model name in about phone says unknown, and I don't remember for sure if that is the reason.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] svbarbosa:
Not even 0,001% of the work you have cooking all those builds for us. :good::good:

BTW I am flashing Tesla RC. Hopefully today we´ll have more numbers.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Shadow_God:
Yep that worked....never thought it would of been the version of TWRP...
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Unn113:
Did You remove latest minimal build? last I found is from july [emoji20]

Unn.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] HammerHead69:
Me personally I don't see as a needed thing as far as a tmo specific build goes I mean I've used DU and really only thing is NFC mainly.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
So NFC actually works on tmo build?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
It wasn't supposed to be there, the dev asked me not to post it.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] HammerHead69:
Supposedly yes but I never bothered to use it
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Has anyone else tried the setting to change lock screen wallpaper? It actually changes the desktop wallpaper too. I saw this issue on 1 other rom as well. Other than that, this rom is running awesome as usual.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] cuezaireekaa:
Didn't notice that,

but on my aosp ROMs, I use this app, then i uninstall it (after bkup) when I find and apply the lock screen I want. Works on all ROMs I've tried.[emoji106]

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.miniprepumen.cm12.changelockscreencm12

sent from an sm-n900t
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
Works fine here, changed my lockscreen wall and it didn't change the home screen.

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Wow, that's weird. I just changed from permissive to enforcing, rebooted, and now it works. Coincidence?

---------- Post added at 08:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:25 AM ----------

Yeah I've been using that one for a long while too with success, but was just testing the one built in settings on the rom.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Shadow_God:
Try turning off "display music visualizer" and then apply a wallpaper on your lock screen...
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Jalplo:
Hi. To all. Question there any way to lock the files , I mean grabs them and put it into a folder with a code . like validus.? Thank you

Sorry but I can hold my self from post this Note 5 :(

https://youtu.be/4LjwGlIxIp0
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Has anyone had any issues with layers? Most layers theme properly but when I apply some others, after reboot, the unlock buttons and power menu lock up and after battery pull, everything starts working again.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] HammerHead69:
Nope but I've had a few random reboots & freeze ups but I'm using e3 1.3 kernel but changed gov to smartassv2 been good since.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] DJ KELL-E:
Update worked perfect. No problems so far. Great work Encho
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
Nope, that's the whole point of having this. This is practically validus with layers. For cm engine go with validus.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
Tapatalked that shiznit.

---------- Post added at 05:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:56 PM ----------

Latest build is indeed solid here, cheers!

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Solid here too. I really like layers, it's cool to have the ability to theme only the apps you want themed.

Sent from my SM-N900T. using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
Exactly. Mix and match too! There's a great status bar/ navbar layer community on G+ https://plus.google.com/communities/113745499308660700173

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] TrypelZ:
What theme is this?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
SublimevRed (from Play Store) with Play settings icons https://plus.google.com/100974154521755789708/posts/Z6G8YhGcBkZ and flatcolor statusbar icons! http://xdaforums.com/android/themes/theme-statusbar-softkeyz-collection-t3129303

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] TrypelZ:
Thanks man !:)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Running smooth as butter! The only issue I have is with onboard sounds like touch sounds, even with viper installed and working for music, I can barely hear the sounds even with volume up full blast. I have the issue on all roms except Temasek. Does anyone else have the same?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] HammerHead69:
Encho you're my hero!!! Been wanting to run Tesla bad & look out you built note3 a build many thanks bro????
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Ryan 23:
Encho you're killing me with all these ROMs! I honestly have no idea which one I should choose lol

For the most customization options which one(s) do you recommend I try? Everybody else are welcome to give their opinions too of course.

And mainly what I'm here to say is thanks for all your efforts mate! Seriously what you're doing here is just beyond compare :good:

Cheers :)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] HammerHead69:
Trust me give Tesla a spin this ROM is blazing fast!!!
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Ryan 23:
All of Encho's ROMs are blazing fast that I'm fully aware of. It's just that I want to know which ones have the most customization options as this is what interests me the most.

Thanks for your input mate :)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
I think Tesla has quite a bit of customisation with more exciting things to come and it's my favourite. But from the ones I've tried, I think BrokenOS has the most customisation options. Both roms have layers instead of CMTE which I really like, just takes a little while to get the hang of. If you prefer TE, go with Blisspop, also quite a bit of customisation there.

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Ryan 23:
I will try Tesla first, thanks for your help :)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Hey scoob, did you notice the low latency volume for onboard sounds? Even with viper installed and working when I listen to music, it doesn't have any effect on the touch sounds, etc. like on Temasek. Do you know of a fix?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
Well the thing is, I replace my system sounds for custom ones. Remember the soundpacks feature in Omnirom and some other roms? I still have some soundpacks and use an app called UI sound themer so I don't have to push them all manually, it's great! So my sounds are pretty noticeable. But in the short time I had stock sounds, I can't say I noticed any latency and my custom sounds seem as loud as usual. I'm also using Viper.

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Alx31:
Edit: nice thread :)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
I am random dude as well until this becomes official. Lol.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
I don't know why then, but viper for me doesn't have any effect on in board stock sounds. I mean it works for music and all.

Sent from my SM-N900T using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Same kernel I'm using. I just wiped cache and dalvik in recovery and just tried 3 different themes and it's not locking up now. All is good!

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Shadow_God:
Nice theme....what theme you using?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] btvolta:
Called crystal tronik. It is only on Google + in the bitsyko forum.

https://plus.google.com/112720085596177626136/posts/EUr8vkG9ZhN

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
And there's pink version of it now. [emoji1]

Sorry for the lack of updates, but since my last build there's been a lot of updates in the code, making it bit unstable. Dual column will probably be gone in the next build. Second issue is that my kernel doesn't play well with latest version, at least on default settings. Some non-standard governors seem to be more stable as you've noticed.

I'm currently running Tesla with slightly modified temasek's kernel and it seems to be working great. [emoji41] Both battery and smoothness wise.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] svbarbosa:
Good to hear from you. Was starting to feel worried with your silence and lack of activity in your download site.

---------- Post added at 22:04 ---------- Previous post was at 21:46 ----------

BTW, still running that CM with Layers build that had to be removed. :)

In one word, awesome.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] temasek:
Not cool... Fyi

https://github.com/ench0/android_ke...mmit/deecc7b0fc7a133871ff37d22ced26c2431b05f5

https://github.com/ench0/android_ke...mmit/a4ca7cb141da7119dcb5941846915cf4ac8bb635

https://github.com/ench0/android_kernel_samsung_hltet/commits/e3
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
Sorry, that's just beginning and for testing purposes, it isn't available in any rom. I would give full credit to you.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
New build is up. [emoji41]
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
I'm glad the settings are back to single column, my big font didn't look right in dual pane!

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] PMCBA:
Hi,

Slim gapps link doesn't work, can you please solve the problem?

Thanks
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
Google can help in the meantime: http://xdaforums.com/slimroms/general/gapps-official-slim-gapps-trds-slimkat-t2792842

There's 5.1 gapps there

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
I'll update the links once I have the time. Currently on vacation in sunny Spain. [emoji41]
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
Enjoy!

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] jomar_uk:
[MENTION=2734070]encho[/MENTION]

[MENTION=4728887]scoobyjenkins[/MENTION]

Working great so far here.

Need help on one thing please.

When I goto reboot I do not have the reboot to recovery option, is there a hidden switch I may have missed please.

Shalom and have a great holiday, john

BTW using tkgapps 5.1.1 full modular with no problems.

Update: Ooops found in advanced reboot :)

Further update: I use smart launcher pro (maybe coincidental) and had 2 FC's during home screen customising. Different things both times. [MENTION=2734070]encho[/MENTION]
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] svbarbosa:
You should have come to sunny Rio de Janeiro. I would have helped you around. :cool:
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] scoobyjenkins:
I've always used Nova and no issues there

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] jomar_uk:
[MENTION=4728887]scoobyjenkins[/MENTION]

Many thanks, I have the paid version of that also, will try it later.

My preference is smart launcher pro working fine on other roms maybe a glitch? Will keep a careful eye open.

Shalom john
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] TeddyKhalifa:
Do anyone have screenshot of sot from this rom ? (latest build)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Mazda:
[MENTION=2734070]encho[/MENTION] what's the current kernel source you're using for this ROM?

Reason I ask is that you have 2 different kernel links and from what I understand, you're using a fork of our kernel source here https://github.com/ench0/android_kernel_samsung_hlted

BUT yet you're linking to something else.....I want to get you on the record for what you're including in this ROM since there seems to be a misunderstanding between a member of DU and yourself

Thanks
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] HayssamDKK:
Sm-n900

Is it compatible with sm-n900?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
I keep switching between sources, experimenting a lot. I have hlte, hlted, hltez and up until recently hltet, all coming from different devs. I am trying to find the one that is most stable but still relatively featured packed. So far I like DU source the best, with few small tweaks. I should probably update the OP to include all the sources, I was just hoping I would made up my mind till now and settle for one. [emoji51]

As soon as I'm back from holidays, I'll have the things moved around. Although I don't get what's the misunderstanding all about, as I have highest regards for DU team and don't have any issues with you guys? Something I did?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Mazda:
Well it was just that. The misunderstanding revolved around what kernel you were using and if you were using yours, why not give credit where is due by linking it in the OP as per the GPL
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
Sure, I do mention your efforts wherever I have chance, in this thread several times. I will decide which variant I will stick with sometimes next week.

In kernel source as well. https://github.com/ench0/android_ke...mmit/1ccb6fb9e643dd51aaecac42c1fa67fb54a488b6

PS I actually entitled it 'credit where credit is due', lol.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] svbarbosa:
Here is an updated version of my Note 3 AOSP Roms Comparison spreadsheet, with latest Tesla build.

[MENTION=2734070]encho[/MENTION], I vote for the hltet kernel. ;)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
Hmm, tesla got slower based on that, although doesn't feel like that. It would be interesting to see new Broken.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Mazda:
See you didn't have to do that, all you had to do per GPL as just link to the source which you still haven't.

http://www.xda-developers.com/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html

As of right now, nobody but you knows which kernel source you're using. You said you're just swapping them out blah blah blah but it doesn't take that long to link to the source for which kernel you're including in the ROM zip you got linked in the OP.

Maybe this is a joke to you but I take this seriously. If you're going to mock it and act like is at your convenience then tell me, I should of not wasted my time here. I assumed I was talking to an adult......
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] svbarbosa:
Deleted.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Mazda:
Just so there's no issues with you twisting things and saying I'm trolling you or I'm "hating" or any BS

This is a screenshot of the About Phone section of this ROM right now

[IMG="http://i.imgur.com/b09xzQ5.png"]http://i.imgur.com/b09xzQ5.png[/IMG]

In the OP, you have this linked as "Kernel source code (official) soon"

https://github.com/TV-LP51-Devices/?utf8=✓&query=hlte

BUT as you can see, there's no kernel for the hlte in that org, nothing for the hlte but device repos

Then you have another link for "Alternative kernel"

https://github.com/ench0/android_kernel_samsung_hlte

BUT if you regen the deconfig you're using (msm8974_sec_defconfig) you'll see that is not a 3.4.108 kernel

So that leaves me to believe that you're indeed using our kernel which is actually a 3.4.108 found here https://github.com/ench0/android_kernel_samsung_hlted

All I was trying to get you to do was take 5 seconds and link the kernel in the OP......you mocked it and pretty much wiped your butt with the GPL

You claim you're on "holiday" but keep on making post after post after post YET you don't have 5 seconds to update the OP.......is unbelievable
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
Man, we are cool. I AM on holiday, that OP needs major restructuring and it is not very convenient to do it from phone, cause that's how I'm posting this stuff. The OP was done a while ago while this was still unofficial. Check back next week, and you'll see I'm serious. Don't jump the gun yet, you got the wrong guy.

Edit: it is easy to check my IP address, ask the mods. It will prove where I'm posting from, all my previous posts were from different country.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
You're free to analyse gps meta data of this photo, taken 3 minutes ago. [emoji41] Lolol.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] svbarbosa:
In my experience, once you are above 30000 Antutu you can´t tell the difference running normal apps. Maybe heavy games but I do not run any.

What I care about is the reboot time. And there is a major difference from Tesla 1.8 to 2.1: 60 seconds to 105 seconds. The boot process pushes the phone to the limit and gives a much more realistic measure of how it will behave on day to day use while multitasking a few apps.

That´s where the Arter97 kernel test helps. Running the same 5.3.2 kernel the reboot time is almost the same for both Tesla builds - 76 x 77 seconds.

So the ROM performance is about the same for the 1.8 and 2.1 builds. The difference is in the kernel.

Before I forget: I will test Broken last build, saturday the latest. The truth is I do not really like it. May be a subliminal message that comes with the name. :p

Not really. Truth is Broken misses one little feature I can not live without: assign "Last app" to long press menu key. During Xposed times it could be easily fixed with the Xposed Additions module. But now that I got used to live without Xposed I do not even consider bringing it back. So Broken is out my list of possible Roms to use.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
OP updated to include all 3 kernel sources. Hugely inconvenient doing it from the phone, but I was reported to the moderators and had no choice. I can ask them later to give me a refund on half hour that I used from my vacation. :cyclops: Cool, I'm getting popular ;).
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] foxtaur:
see now I feel bad for pestering encho about added features to his kernel, you enjoy your vacation, don't overwork yourself.

NB = still haven't found anything regarding cpuquiet, well I have but its in over my head. I do have a nvidia tegra PDF file that sorta explains what it does in layman's terms but its completely useless to you. Maxwen sorta creates his own "load_stats" for meant for this hotplug but seems to only work with interactive based governors.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Unn113:
[MENTION=2734070]encho[/MENTION], #BlameAlexCruz [emoji13]

Unn.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] zetlorf:
You are a great rom maker/modder, your AOSP rom ports are among the best roms for our N3.

As a personal experience and talking about kernels, the latest 2 versions of Euphoria had a poor battery life (at least for me), but i installed temasek's kernel found on his page and the battery performance has greatly improved. So, if someone had this problem i suggest to install temasek's kernel, and maybe you encho will consider to build your kernel on temasek's. :)
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
You're the second person saying this, I probably could. There was misunderstanding few days ago when Tema thought I was using his kernel for my builds, while I was just testing it for possible new base. I'll probably just start my own kernel from scratch.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
I'm considering making new kernel, similar to lean, very basic, but that will include things that DO make the difference, like your KCAL and alu suggestions. Again your input hugely appreciated.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] foxtaur:
read up on the HTC one m8, this kernel apparently has the cpuquiet implementation. I know there are lollipop snapdragon devices out there with maxwen's sources. it's still a little in over my head to understand though

http://xdaforums.com/htc-one-m8/orig-development/kernel-lonelyx-001-t2881605

NB= btw, why the change in kernel? will it still have important governors such as fiops, and option for fastcharge?
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Mazda:
So you can reply back to my posts, post pictures of some pool and pretty much BS on this thread BUT you can't update the OP with the right link to your kernel source and comply with GPL?

Is that what you're getting at?

You want me to wait a week for you to update the OP to comply with GPL because you're in another country? I don't see how updating the OP requires you to be back home........takes 5 seconds on mobile or with your desktop

Stop making excuses man.....anyone else and they would of just been "oh my bad and just updated the OP to comply with GPL" but you think you're "special" because you're on holiday and supposedly is under you to update the OP on your phone

This just crazy!! I've seen people lose their titles, get banned and have their threads closed for not updating the kernel source link in the OP but yet you think you're above that and want everyone to wait a week because you're on "holiday" yet make post after post and even posted a picture of your pool here......WTF man
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] encho:
Already updated the OP, read the posts.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] svbarbosa:
Too bad you [MENTION=1289361]Mazda[/MENTION] took it the wrong way.

You and [MENTION=2734070]encho[/MENTION] are among a small group of very special people that devote a significant amount of personal free time to benefit many others just for the sake of it.

[MENTION=2734070]encho[/MENTION] has always surprised me with his partience, great sense of humor and extreme care with what he does. Participating is his threads is always a pleasure.

I am absolutely sure that he would never even think about taking credit for something he did not do. He is always careful about giving credits to whoever them belong.

If he said that was just experimenting with the kernels it is the truth. Actually, by not listing the original devs during this test phase he was trying to protect them from finger pointing that could result from wrongdoings due to his experiments.

Anyway I truly believe that you, wonderful people, should be helping each other. And if there are some doubts or hard feelings, should first exchange PMs to sort things out before doing something more drastic like what we saw here. No need to wash dirty laundry in public.
[Galaxy Note 3 Android Development] Mazda:
Looking at your thread history, there's no way someone as experienced as you should have to have someone like tell you to update your kernel source.....that's common sense man! Seems lazy to have taken you this long....

Thing is that all that you just mentioned about being someone with great sense of humor and having patience blah blah blah that doesn't come into play here

This isn't Facebook or a dating site! I could care less what your personality is or his......I really don't care

What I care about is him complying with the GPL like the rest of us! I asked him what kernel he was using because I knew he was lying about what he had you guys think and ultimately I have proof that the kernels he was claiming were non-existent or outdated and the one he truly was using was ours

All he had to do is take 5 seconds to update the OP with the link, instead he made post after post after post where he mocked the GPL, posted pictures of some pool and was BSing with you all on here....

Maybe you think I'm this and that, I honestly don't care what you think of me because like I said this isn't Facebook or dating site. I'm not here to convince you to be my BFF. I'm here to collaborate with developers and share my work. If you thinking asking someone to comply with GPL is too far or airing dirty laundry then so be it

I think asking someone to comply with GPL is development related over asking "how's the battery life on this" or some BS question