yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xposed General] kryshnakishore:
November security patch of some roms & kernal s of oneplus are forceclosing when xposed is installed. Any help/fix
[Xposed General] Portgas D. Ace:
Not related to the Xposed Installer, but to the framework itself. Check the corresponding framework thread.
[Xposed General] wilsonhlacerda:
Thank you!
[Xposed General] leecos3:
thanks!ffff:p
[Xposed General] rambomhtri:
Hi, I've posted the next message in the Xposed discussion thread, which by the way already has the 3.1.1 apk installer. Shouldn't this thread get mixed/fusion with the other one since now the official Xposed thread already has your material apk?

Why here's a more recent updated apk, and still has a lower number 3.0.1 instead of the apk in the official Xposed thread that has the 3.1.1 version and was released 2 weeks ago?

Anyways, the message:

Edit:

I reply myself, I think it was because I didn't have Internet connection so the list of the versions couldn't load. Nevertheless, the warning should be "the list couldn't load" or "there's no internet connection". I still don't know what that warning meant.
[Xposed General] Portgas D. Ace:
Well, technically the warning is correct. The zip files couldn't be loaded because of no network access. It's a universal warning, it might also show up in cases where network access is present, but the server can't be reached due to other technical issues.
[Xposed General] tomaasz:
[MENTION=5345056]DVDandroid[/MENTION]

Thank you for great app!

Have you got any plans for add synchronization of favorite modules, as it is avalible in XDA Labs app ?
[Xposed General] rambomhtri:
Oh, that makes sense, buy if you don't put something about Internet, it can be confusing. Something like couldn't load zips due to a problem with Internet.

Do you know the answer about the other questions?
[Xposed General] nithint1093:
Bootloop

Will it lead to bootloops which I experienced in my HTC one m9 after getting xposed?
[Xposed General] ali nz:
Official xposed has a material version now...silly question but whats the different between these?
[Xposed General] jaydee 77:
This based on official xposed installer 3.1.1?

https://github.com/rovo89/XposedInstaller/releases

If yes, why is your version called 3.0.1 not also 3.1.1? Would be less confusing.
[Xposed General] MrWasdennnoch:
This is the installer and not the framework, it won't bootloop anything but without the framework the installer is useless.

The official one still has less features than this one because rovo89 only copied some features. I think the official one doesn't have an update checker for example.
[Xposed General] iXaidyiu:
And no sectioned download too.
[Xposed General] Portgas D. Ace:
There has been an official announcement by pixeltech about it some time ago (around two weeks ago). Read a few pages back.
[Xposed General] kopitalk:
You're confused by this kind of thing? How long you've been in xda? :p

Stick to one and don't be bothered with the other.
[Xposed General] rambomhtri:
Well, I am confused too by that.

Since this thread and the material design of Xposed was not official (Xposed official), it made all sense to have different apk versions and names:

Official apk: XposedInstaller 3.0 alpha 4

Unofficial custom made Xposed: Material design Xposed Installer 3.0.1 or whatever

But 2 weeks ago, the official Xposed thread included this material design apk, so now you have 2 official versions, the alpha 4 and the 3.1.1 Material design version. I don't know why there are still 2 different versions of the Xposed Installer Material Design apk.
[Xposed General] MrWasdennnoch:
The official version is different from this one, they aren't the same. While this one received many updates the version number is higher, and although rovo89 copied some changes this one still has more features and thus is still available and being maintained.
[Xposed General] rambomhtri:
OK, thanks. But here's the thing:

Now, all the team that worked and is working on this Material Design Xposed Installer "has become official developers" for the official Xposed thread and app...

Shouldn't you work with rovo89 on one single apk (the 3.1.1 apk), instead of having two parallel apk that are meant to be exactly the same app?

:confused: Thanks!
[Xposed General] ldeveraux:
no, they are separate,just drop it.
[Xposed General] mielletseed:
All your questions where explained before so it's boring to read this discussion ... (forum rules: first search then ask ;))

Second, why should the development of this app be stopped only because rovo89 did use one ore a few features of it (e.g. material design)? This app has more advantages and why is it bad to have a choice? Can't understand your argumentation! If you prefer rovo89's version just use this one and when you think this one is better then use this.

Why are there more than one eMail or messaging apps or browsers? Wouldn't it be enough to have just one of each and all have to use the same? ;) Or just one type of cars, yogurts, coats ... :D
[Xposed General] gideonlfc:
Couldn't have explained it better
[Xposed General] rambomhtri:
OK, your examples are not valid, at all.

The point is both apks are supposed to be the EXACT same app, it doesn't make any sense that rovo89 works in one version of the Material Design apk, and then other team do the exact same job, developing the very exact same app (that would end up developing what has been already done by the other team). That would end up with 2 different Material design apks, where one has some features the other one lacks, and viceversa. The logical thing is to fusion and work together when the app is exactly the same, which happens to be the case. What can co-exist is one apk of Material Design, other ICS Design, other one Windows Phone design...

But here we're not talking about Dolphin vs Chrome vs Firefox vs Opera, we're talking about 2 different teams that are working separately in a Firefox version, both improving Firefox in their own way. That would result in 2 different Firefox apps (which has no sense, at all) where users, at the end, will want some features from the Firefox devoloped by Team A, and some other features from the Firefox developed by Team B, but could never have both (nonsense). Instead, if both teams work together, the end result would be a single Firefox app that has all the improvements both teams have developed.

It's easy to understand. :rolleyes:
[Xposed General] FaulFels:
They are not the same.

Rovo89 just picked some parts.
[Xposed General] rambomhtri:
Duh, that's exactly what I said, here:
[Xposed General] FaulFels:
So, go blame rovo89!

He was the one!
[Xposed General] rambomhtri:
I'm not blaming anyone, I'm just asking them why they don't fusion their apk's, because they're meant to be the same app, there're no advantages keeping them separated.

:confused:
[Xposed General] FaulFels:
Then don't blame, but ask rovo89!

I personally want to keep this version here. It has more features I like and use.

Rovo89 decided not to use all of the features. I don't know why, but I also don't ask.

This one here has all I want. I'm satisfied.
[Xposed General] Devo7v:
Think of them as the same as Google having multiple versions of Chrome in the Play Store, they have Chrome, Chrome beta, and Chrome dev. Things are tested on the dev branch and then once they have been tested and vetted, make their way into the stable branch. That's similar to what's going on here.

While it may seem like it, rovo89 and DVDandroid are not working on a team together. rovo89 developed the original Xposed installer. DVDandroid then took his original installer and materialized it and added a ton of new features because rovo89 didn't have the time or just didn't want to work on the installer. Once rovo89 took notice of DVDandroid's materialized installer, he cherry-picked various features and theming and re-incorporated them back into the original Xposed installer. rovo89 credited DVDandroid with the work he had done, but they are not necessarily working together as a team in the traditional sense.

The two versions of the Xposed installer are developed by two different people and provide a different set of features. One is not necessarily better than the other, they are just different and intended for two different audiences. I firmly believe that DVDandroid should continue to develop his fork of the Xposed installer because it will push rovo89 to incorporate new features into the original Xposed installer and continue development of it, rather than let it stagnate. If you really want the two apps to merge and become one, you really should be posting and talking to rovo89, because he is the only one that has the power to do that. Short of that your posts are doing nothing but clogging up the thread, please stop.
[Xposed General] Ibuprophen:
For those who are wondering about Xposed not working with the newer CM ROM's (ie... Bootlooping)...

Please read this:

http://xdaforums.com/xposed/discussion-xposed-marshmallow-t3249095/post69622412#post69622412

Peace and Love!

Peace and Love!
[Xposed General] mielletseed:
To me they are

They are NOT supposed to be exactly the same! For example why should rovo89 even bother to support unofficial XPosed versions?

Ib my opinion you are to much fixed to the design... Why would it be okay to have different versions with different designs (instead of using theming) but not different versions with different other features?

There are forks of most apps since people have different needs...

There are WaterFox, Chromium, LibreOffice. There are many different Android distributions CM, PA, MIUI,...

And why would it be okay to have different browsers when they all are used to do the same job: browsing the world wide web? But why it's not okay to have a fork e. g. of Firefox?

You seem to be trolling... :(
[Xposed General] yochananmarqos:
"Don't work." Wow, that's helpful. There should be no reason why this should not work as there have been no changes to the Xposed Installer. Your issues lie elsewhere.
[Xposed General] drewski_1:
Well, if using Rovo's base installer for v3b4 works, but this one doesn't with MM v77 then this modded version seems to be the issue. . . ?

There are screenshots of the error on the MM thread. Some version error thing.
[Xposed General] shuli81:
I can confirm this does not work on Marshmallow. Modules cannot be activated. Says somthing about being "forward locked". Rovo's works fine though.
[Xposed General] jaibar:
Same forward lock error here, rovo's alpha4 works fine.

Cataclysm MM, nexus5
[Xposed General] hjmodi:
Added
[Xposed General] hjmodi:
Fixed the issue with Xposed for Marshmallow v77.

And also trimmed icon so it'll look proper in size now.

I know things are taking too much but I have just too many thing going on at a time. But I'll make sure that nothing goes completely useless.

Thanks.
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
fixed in my build

wait for apk please

----

edit: added chrome custom tabs

download here
[Xposed General] vjtigas:
Is it also compatible with LP?
[Xposed General] hjmodi:
Yes
[Xposed General] HorstiG:
Works with v78?

And reactivated no translation.

The xml files exist. More than 100 languages.

View attachment 3543694
[Xposed General] yochananmarqos:
Nope. I tried your build first with v77 and had the forward locked issue with installed modules. I uninstalled yours and installed hjmodi's and was able to activate modules. I discovered v78 was out right after and hjmodi's build still works fine.

Maybe you two should collaborate instead of fighting over who did what. ;)
[Xposed General] Mariglade:
Can somebody please help me out? I've been trying to get xposed running.. Before I kept getting this message under framework. "The latest version of xposed is currently not active. Have you installed the latest framework and rebooted? So I installed the xposed installer. I downloaded the linstaller from DVDandroid's latest post. I opened up and now I can't even press the install/update button.. Can somebody please help me.
[Xposed General] yochananmarqos:
This is not the right thread to post about that. This is an unofficial mod of the Xposed Installer. Make sure you have the Framework installed properly first.
[Xposed General] Mariglade:
Can I get a link to the framework? I'm sorry if its not the right thread. I'm just so frustrated. I just want to get xposed running ):
[Xposed General] yochananmarqos:
No. Sorry to sound harsh, but if you don't even know what it is and how to recover from a bootloop, you should not be using it let alone be here.
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
I'm not fighting, we collaborated together on github with bug fixes, new feature ecc....
[Xposed General] Mariglade:
I appreciate your concern to not be harsh. Im new to rooting. but I'm tech savvy. I've just never got around to rooting my phone as I never found a working root for the droid maxx. Now that I've finally rooted it, I'm trying to gain experiece, and better my experience by learning the ropes. What better place to learn how than to communicate with those are experienced?
[Xposed General] yochananmarqos:
Neat, glad to hear that. Thanks to you both for working on it.

I agree, XDA is an awesome place to learn. Reading and searching comes first. Most questions you have are already answered. ;)
[Xposed General] Mariglade:
Thanks for the answer man. Can I find those answers in this thread? Or can you direct me to where I can find them?
[Xposed General] yochananmarqos:
There's a dedicated area for Xposed. Easy to find and a wealth of information lies within. If you have questions, that will be the place to ask them. This is only a thread for a mod of the Xposed Installer.
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
Ok. Stop fighting. You are going off topic.

Like [MENTION=3047491]Devo7v[/MENTION] says, there are two version of Xposed Installer for two different audiences.

Those who have an official version of the framework and don't need other functions, can use rovo89's installer.

Those, instead, that use an unofficial version and want to have an app with more features, can use this.

I updated post #3 with differences between different installers and reasons to continue to maintain this app.
[Xposed General] aerobomb:
can you please help me how to fix this?
[Xposed General] kopitalk:
A reboob?
[Xposed General] Dead-neM:
Lol you made a typo mistake
[Xposed General] aerobomb:
hahaha! i deed reboot many times but i still have error. ='(
[Xposed General] Ibuprophen:
Try This:

See if this helps.

Good Luck!
[Xposed General] fubo73:
Hi all,

I cannot update the app in CM13. When I run the apk, the system reports me an error during package analysis and refuses to install. Previous versions always installed successfully. Installation on S5 stock MM is ok.

Any hint?
[Xposed General] Spott07:
Mistaken post, please ignore.
[Xposed General] mielletseed:
I think you are wrong - the installation of the installer has nothing to do with the bootloop after installing the framework in CM ...
[MENTION=6761559]Spott07[/MENTION]: did you try to redownload the package or transfer the package from your S5?
[Xposed General] Spott07:
Oops, you're right, I misunderstood. I'll fix my post.
[Xposed General] afr33sl4ve:
I'm having an issue where it force closes on me just as I try to open it. I just installed Magisk v9 with Xposed 86.6 using SuperSu 2.78 SR2 and suhide 0.55.

I can roll back to the backup I just made, if needed. It'll be painful starting over (Magisk/Xposed), but eh. It comes with the territory.
[Xposed General] Ibuprophen:
You may need to ask the Magisk Dev(s) that question. [MENTION=5345056]DVDandroid[/MENTION] developed his XPosed Material Design Installer to work with the official v86 Framework installed.
[Xposed General] afr33sl4ve:
Something else must be going on. I just installed the installer apk, with no Magisk/Xposed. Only SuperSU 2.78 SR2 and suhide 0.55. It still force closes when I try to open it up.

Standard Xposed Installer works. Not DVDandroid's version.
[Xposed General] Licaon_Kter:
Logs?
[Xposed General] afr33sl4ve:
I have aLogcat installed, but I'm not sure how to use it.

So, I noticed a new entry when retrying DVD's Installer;

W(32755) Attempted to finish an input event but the input even receiver has already been disposed. (InputEventReceiver)

Umm... Ok...

While doing the install/uninstall cycle, trying to get logs for you... DVDandroid's version just loaded up. No reboot, nothing. Just install official, get log, uninstall. Install DVD version, get log, uninstall. Doing this 3-4 times, it finally worked.
[Xposed General] Ibuprophen:
It seems as though the XPosed Installer somehow wasn't installing appropriately till the final install you performed had succeeded.

I wonder if [MENTION=5345056]DVDandroid[/MENTION] knows if this is an isolated issue or something a handful (or more) of individuals was having this issue or similar...

Hmmmm...
[Xposed General] aerobomb:
i will try later. thanks
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
If the crash persists, you should try test version available from download tab in this thread.

I don't need logs, they are caught automatically.
[Xposed General] ginowin:
Hi guys! THIS work for CM 14.1 (Android 7.1)? Pls tell me :)
[Xposed General] gideonlfc:
Xposed for Nougat is not out yet. So no
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
INFO 1: rovo89 has released a TEST framework to fix November patch. In the app will be listed as xposed-v87-sdk23-arm. If you try to install it you get a 404 error.

INFO 2: I added installation of the framework without recovery. I tested it on my old device, if there are volunteers to try this feature before it becomes public, download it here

Installation of topjohnwu's systemless Xposed without /recovery is not supported.
[Xposed General] Aijen:
First question: Xposed v87 dont work or what? I dont understand :/
[Xposed General] kryshnakishore:
Its TEST version just install it if you want support dev in developing . That's what dev is figuring out.

It works with stable/unstablity based on user usuage
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
Xposed framework version 87 is a test. It is listed in the app, but is not downloadable. You get a 404 error.

You can download here the updated apk with installation without /recovery.

Give me feedback please.
[Xposed General] kryshnakishore:
Working well I guess, I dnt see Any changes. Btw test version sends you feedback I think or do I need to send anything?

OnePlus one

RR ROM 6.0.1
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
Have you enabled /system installation from settings?

No, attached version doesn't send feedbacks or crash.
[Xposed General] entony80:
For me has worked well on Kitkat, install or update xposed
[Xposed General] kryshnakishore:
No I did not notice it. Enabled now. I will send reports if I find any bugs
[Xposed General] FPSUsername:
I tried the v87 test 1. Idk why but my phone boots so slow. 1 minute 33 seconds (including oneplus' bootimage).

Rom: Dirty unicorns (latest)

xposed: v87 test 1

85 installed user apps

I don't know if it is xposed (because it does the "starting apps" after the bootanimation) or something else.
[Xposed General] Rakuu:
Uninstall Xposed and compare.
[Xposed General] sansnil:
Is this test version systemless?
[Xposed General] moriel5:
No, it is not.
[Xposed General] MsuatafaKhatab:
I have error 255 while installing Xposed for miui
[Xposed General] Ibuprophen:
This Error is commonly a result of the wrong ARM version being installed.

If you tried the ARM, try the ARM64...

If you tried the ARM64, try the ARM...
[Xposed General] aerobomb:
there is no disable file inside /conf folder
[Xposed General] kunfei:
Can change the version number to a high point
[Xposed General] fatspirit:
Good for you (:
[Xposed General] fubo73:
ehhhh???? :confused::confused::confused:
[Xposed General] MrWasdennnoch:
That's not related to the issue at all.

What?
[Xposed General] kunfei:
Application market is always prompted to upgrade
[Xposed General] MrWasdennnoch:
Do you mean XDA labs? The installer is not on thw Play store. Do you actually have the latest version installed?
[Xposed General] grep_i:
Yes it is

And your point is what exactly ?
[Xposed General] fubo73:
As no one can help me, could someone post previous version of installer? I am having this issue only with latest apk.

Thanks.
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
Uninstall Xposed Installer from your device, download latest version from here and install it
[Xposed General] fubo73:
Already done and getting always same message. This happens on CM13, it does not on stock Samsung S5.
[Xposed General] sansnil:
This worked great on my Shamu with the AOSP stock November Google update. All modules working as designed. :D
[Xposed General] Romiui:
installation ok .

if i install any module i restart then stuck with boot animation ! .. any idea ?

CM13 18-11-2016 nightly
[Xposed General] fubo73:
Hmmm, it seems related to latest CM13 I installed. Any apk that is not from Google Play fails to install...

Perhaps you already have latest November security patch that breaks XPosed framework. Search around and you will find more info.
[Xposed General] fubo73:
Just FYI, I had to factory reset the CM13 phone to get it working again... Very strange :confused:
[Xposed General] aerobomb:
sorry! i made a wrong quote. =(
[Xposed General] grep_i:
Well than that is now cleared up then, can happen to anybody ;)
[Xposed General] gideonlfc:
It happens on the latest November update. Some rom devs are fixing that in their updates but I saw on the official Xposed thread that they've fixed it irrespective of the rom so you can check that out while we wait for something similar here
[Xposed General] Yudh:
[MENTION=5345056]DVDandroid[/MENTION]

In the latest update you have implemented app shortcuts for Android nougat which is good .

Can you please consider making a quick tile also

You have to use 2 classes

TileService and Tile

âœŒï¸
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
Sincerely, I don't find the need to add this functionality.
[Xposed General] Yudh:
Just for finding if there's any update available

✌️
[Xposed General] Rakuu:
A quick tile for that is pointless, that's not what quick tiles are for. Either way you can probably do it with Tasker if you want it that bad.
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
New update! 26/11/16

NEW: /system installation without recovery

NEW: module's name and description are selectable

FIX: apply default round icon

FIX: architecture error

FIX: bug when changing language

FIX: FCs

Updated translations.

Download here

You need to change preference from settings if you want /system installation.

Tested with official and MIUI zips. wanam's version not tested. Systemless installation is not supported.

Bug in second post not fixed.

Pull requests are welcome on GitHub

---

Updated test version too
[Xposed General] muzliamir:
Good

---------- Post added at 02:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:47 PM ----------
[Xposed General] Aijen:
Thanks a Lot! :)
[Xposed General] DVDandroid:
Updated test version. It fixes a force close. The bug isn't present in the release apk.