yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Kaleidgalaxy:
In main menu choose MISC, and u will find SSWAP settings
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] PaPa_nIc0LaU:
Sure for this question

Sswap must be on or off?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] guillemoka:
It's off by default, but as I have read you can try it on if you feel your phone a little laggy
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] kenzo901:
hi googy been wanting to ask why on v1.3 i never encounted knox fc but on v1.4 and v1.5 i encounter them?

i know i can freeze knox via TB just wondering why if its the same base.

using wanamlite v2.3 rom :)

anyway great kernel as i found out best combo for wanamlite is v1.3 of your kernel i kept reverting back to v1.3 after trying v1.4 and v1.5
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] randy.turker:
Hi googy, your kernel rocks!

Just wondering if you will add double tap to wake functionality to your kernel?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] TareqMh:
how i can apply it ?

should i use odin ?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] D3m0l1t10nM4n:
A Little Getting Used To...But Good!

Hey Everyone:

N910C, Googy-Max 1.5 on Anatolia ROM A14, Alliance Mod Dark v1, Xposed.

Switched from Ultimate Kernel v38. Had issues just flashing Googy over the top of Ultimate, so I backed up my data partition in TWRP, did a full wipe, clean install Anatolia A14/Alliance/Googy/Xposed/DNSCrypt/Custom Shutdown animation, restored data partition and reboot.

Someone else already brought up the busybox issue, which I encountered as well, as a long-time BusyBox Pro user. I finally came to the conclusion that I wouldn't fight what the kernel wants for busybox because there is some more interesting functionality I wanted to achieve. I came to Googy for the active development & access to source code, which I need in order to compile some driver modules in my chrooted Debian Linux install on the device. :cyclops:

A very frustrating little snag that I ran into has to do with my use of Chainfire's Liveboot app when switching to Googy. Basically, it appears the Liveboot script is not executed reliably at boot. It works the first time after you install it, then *p00f*! It's taken me a couple of days to figure out how to work around this and get Liveboot to show at each and every boot. The answer was simple after I read briefly on su.d, whose scripts are run after init.d scripts. So, I copied the 0000liveboot script from /system/su.d to /etc/init.d, tested four times in a row and got the Liveboot every time. Problem solved. :D

Now that I have all that worked out, I think I'll stick around for a while. :good: It's nice to have easy access to an active development kernel with source code. Chasing Ultimate was bothersome to say the least!

Thanks googy_anas!
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] trongnghia2411:
Using googy 1.4 and the battery has never been better. Whole day and still 59% left, normally by this time I would have 20!

Thank you!
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] gabi11:
Still the same for me.

During the night the drainage is usually something like 0.9% per hour, with deep sleep of 99-98%.

Weird.......

Someone else here experienced better battery life on 1.4 than 1.5?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] bedofrosesss:
Battery and signal

Well it did not solve my problem so i turned back to v.1.4 (Also battery was draining faster in v1.5) Anyway googymax is so good kernel. thanx. hope this problem will be solved next version.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Abdl:
Which rom?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Iqbal641:
Who are using this kernel on glamour s6?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] mikelimtw:
Use on SM-N910U

Has anyone tried this kernel on the SM-N910U variant of the Note 4? Yes, I do realize that it was stated up front that this is only for 910C, I'm just wondering if there are more adventurous and crazy people than me :D
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Tauras:
Me. It works nicely.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Iqbal641:
What about ram
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Kaleidgalaxy:
I also use this kernel on Glamour S6. Dont have issues with ram. It similar to other custom rom I tried
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Tauras:
It depends. Usually about 550-690MB of free.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Iqbal641:
What setting your
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] ikostas_1:
With simple rom v4 on n910c the new kernel version (v1.5) was very laggy to me.. I couldn't resolve this.. I fall back to v1.4.. I flashed v1.5 over v1.4.. need of clean install??
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Tauras:
SSWAP on, A53 -25mV, A57 -50mV, others are stock.

---------- Post added at 10:55 ---------- Previous post was at 10:53 ----------

No need for clean install. If you want extra safety, you can wipe dalvik cache.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] tmac31:
hi guys can any1 make geekbench test with 2.1ghz on a57 and 1.5ghz on a53?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] mehdi.moha:
Gear [MENTION=1546289]googy[/MENTION]

i checked in systerm_tuner_pro , the cpu frequencies will not go more that stock ! so the overclocking is not make ant change . can you please let me know the solution ?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
I've set a53 to 1.4GHz and a57 to 2.0GHz :

As you can see, they are used !

Envoyé de mon SM-N910C en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Pannam:
any chance of it working on SM-910H ?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] asmen5:
Set A53 1.8Hz, A57 2.1Hz, only work 1.5Hz... N910H
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] white7561:
Can the A53 cpu overclocked to 1.8? I dont think A57 can go to 2.1 maybe only 2.0?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Tauras:
Mine can go up to 2.1GHz for A57 but not more than 1.6GHz on A53. It actually doesn't matter for A53s because frequencies over 1.5GHz aren't used at all (had to force 1.6GHz as a min frequency for stability)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] tmac31:
can you make a geekbench test while a57 on 2.1 and a53 on 1,5?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Lodix:
It won't get the Exynos 7420 scores.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] tmac31:
well i just wonder 1300/4600 stock scores on my note 4. and my s6 edge gets around 1500/5300 im pretty sure if 5433 doesnt throttle it will get the same score 7420 still a stock arm core. performance per mhz is still same.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Tauras:
No, it won't. Architecture improvements make 7420 much more advanced SoC. I tried Geekbench before on 1.5/2.1 and it gets like 1250/4500. With ktoonservative governor (other kernel) and aggressive performance tuning I got 1400/5000 with 1.5/2.1. It wasn't worth it due to power consumption, so I keep it at 1.3/1.9 now. No difference.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] tmac31:
well not really. 7420 is just a stock arm a57/a53 chipset there is no tuning from samsung. only difference is its 14 nm so it can stay longer on high freqs and its 200 mhz higher clocked. so its better on sustainable performance thats sure. but for peak performance it should be same with 5433. but there is a chance ofc an overclocked 5433 can throttle before a finishing a single geekbench test.

and if you get 1250/4500 with 2.1/1.5 either its throttled or oc didnt happen cuz like i said my fully stock note 4 gets 1300/4600. but anyway i just wonder it, i think anytihng over 1.9 is pretty much overkill
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] gabi11:
So I decided to go back and flashed 1.4 yesterday.

first night with it- back to 0.4% drainage per hour.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] white7561:
Does you undervolt the OC freq or overvolt it? And did only on this kernel the A53 1.6ghz is not used at all without forcing to min? Thx bro
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Socotroco:
Hi all,

I've read in other topics that SSP_SENSORHUB_WAKE_LOCK and SSP_WAKE_LOCK are related to pedometer functionality and it's implemented at kernel level.

I have tried by freezing S Health with Titanium Backup but it didin't work, this is not related to a user level app, it's a kernel thing.

You can see these wake locks mostly when you walk with your phone in your pocket, sometimes I end the day with 2 hours of this wakelock and about 1:30 hrs of screen on time, battery at 45%.

I have checked for other wakelocks but no one is significant enough to be concerned except for these 2 I mentioned.

This has happened to my Note 4 (N910c) on all kernels(stock rooted, Adam, Perseus and GoogyMax).

Does any one knows how to stop those 2 wake locks?

Best regards,
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Tauras:
I think I overvolted 1.6GHz but it's a useless frequency. Yes, it doesn't get used at all. It must be forced using other kernel monitoring apps but only for stability tests. 1.5GHz is the max that is used.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Lodix:
You must have a really high asv ( or very cold temperature ambient ) to get that scores with stock, not normal scores. And there are more differents between 5433 and 7420 than just the process node. The Exynos 5433 throttles before finishing the geekbench, the SOC can't sustain 4×1'9GHz Cortex a57 cores ( it is over 7W ).
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] tmac31:
Well i dont know my asv but generally my lowest score is 1260/4400 and im talking about 1st try ofc cuz my s6 edge cant give same score on 2nd try too. And if im not wrong anandtech stated raw power difference comes from frequency too since its just standart cortex a57 cores. But its better on sustainable performance ofc.

So thats why i asked for test on 2.1 ghz note 4 but seems its not possible
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Bahaa.Aly:
Recent app dealt still exist

First I want to thank you very much for your smooth kernel .

1.5 version is supposed to fix recent app delay. But I think the problem still exist

I just tried the cm12 ported for n910c by Rayman and I noticed a big difference in speed in recent apps. I think there is a problem that Samsung did not yet diacoverd.

Other than this I think the kernel is very stable and fast

Thank you
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] m.4_ts@yahoo.com:
Woww

These kernel is awesome...
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] D3m0l1t10nM4n:
Running nicely with RulingLite ROM.

★Tapatalked★
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] SaschaHa:
Samsung has deactivated 64 bit functionality of the cores on Exynos 5433, so the 7420 will be a little faster for some things. Maybe you will get same scores in benchmark (with the same clock and some modifications on kernel), but the real performance will be better with 7420.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] tranquility:
Confirm

Recent apps is still laggy
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] XperiaLover:
Link for ver 1.6 please. Thanks for the efforts.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
1.6

[19JUL] Version 1.6 :

- Made SSwap and init.d switches ON by default

- Add KERNEL_MODE_NEON support

- Full support of Unaligned Memory Access

- Added LZ4 support

- Disabled a lot of debugging

- various performance tweaks (mmc, fs, ext4, ...)

IS IT SMOOTH ENOUGH NOW ??? ;)

Happy Aïd to all muslims :angel:
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] zabhi:
Thanks for kernel. Eid Mubarik.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] tmac31:
It highly depends there is a better chance on seeing 64 bit /32 bit difference in benchmarks because in daily basis i dont even feel difference between s 6 edge and note4 . Armv8 cpus give their most potential in 32 bit 64 bit doesnt really mean alot.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] tarantulapg:
When installing new version of your kernel do we need to uninstall STweak app?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
No

Envoyé de mon SM-N910C en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sapphire999:
Wooow :) Just noticed a new kernel release :) Will go flashing right now. Thanks a lot, googy_anas !
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] D3m0l1t10nM4n:
Just flashed on RulingLite over top of 1.5. Only thing was I needed to reconfigure my preferences in STweaks. Otherwise, seems fine.

★Tapatalked★
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] *ReZa*:
Thank you so much. Appreciat your gift in this Great day , happy Eid to you Bro.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] mehdi.moha:
thank u googy!

works like charm on my n910H

عید مبارک

thank u soooooooooo much for what u have done with my GPU

googy kernel + sweet rom = WWWWWOOOOOOOOWWWW AAAAWWWWWSSSSSSOOOOOMMMMMEEEEE
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sapphire999:
Just tested :( Have bad news to report. But lets start from the good ones. Performance is great. That is true.

Now the bad news. Kernel is broken and messed up with system something. Go to play market and get very usefull "SD Maid" program. With new kernel it doesnt see databases(only one found) and results of garbage find are only ~ 10% of a real value. App running root. But still doesnt work normally on v1.6 kernel. And after flashing back v1.5 everything is fine.

Im sory to say that, but seems v1.6 has damaged fs or partition access. Sorry to say, but for for me 1.6 is unusable. Hope fix is coming. And I suggest marking 1.6 as beta release, cauze it doesnt seem to work right.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
Noted. Investigating ...

Envoyé de mon SM-N910C en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
Just investigated. I habe bad and good news.

Let's start with the bad one : Bug confirmed

Good one : problem identified and FIXED !!! :) ;)

Envoyé de mon SM-N910C en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sapphire999:
So fast :) Did you re upload fixed version? Mean replaced v1.6 version with the fixed one?

Thanks a lot :)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
Uploading ...

Envoyé de mon SM-N910C en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sapphire999:
Please tell, when replaced. And I guess it will be good to make a notice somewhere to make everyone reflash kernel to avoid using one with bug inside(just suggestion. Guess it's not critical, but still).

Not sure if bug could affect anything else except SD maid.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
1.6a

Version 1.6 has been replaced by 1.6a to fix a little problem kindly reported by [MENTION=6773528]Sapphire999[/MENTION]. ;)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sapphire999:
Thanks a lot :) Will try a fixed one now :)

Also one more good thing to notice(maybe works only for me, not sure about that), but for some reason modem started working better and sensibly faster(especially upload speed) with the newest kernel :)

Here are screenshots to proove that(have no idea, what you did to modem part, but it's brilliant, cauze with stock kernel and all of you versions before, I never got such strong signal and such good upload speed. 0.2-2 Mbps was max for me on all bands, no matter 4G or 3.5G).
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] kenzo901:
Installed v1.6a no knox fc encountered no need to freeze knox via TB

i noticed that stock weather does not update via wifi says service not available but on mobile data it updates just fine.

location is set to high accuracy on settings

Weather updates just fine via wifi on v1.3 v1.4 and v1.5

anybody encountered this?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] guillemoka:
My stock weather widget update perfectly with WiFi . I'm using the new v1.6a and everything is running smooth
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] kenzo901:
i see will try it out on different wifi network later

thanks for the feedback :)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] :
I just installed kernel 1.6a but i have one little problem - "security warning,Detected unauthorized actions" and i have to restart phone again and again and again...

On 1.5 there wasn't problem.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] jmcostales:
Flashed 1.6a and so far, so good. Just a small concern: there is a slight lag (+/- 1 second) when scrolling through my albums when I open the gallery.

Has anybody else experienced this?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sean Harita:
probably the image load from SD card, it show instantly from internal memory.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] jmcostales:
I don't have an SD card installed. Images are stored in my internal memory. I have 11GB available space.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] GilGameshn1:
It is nothing ... try to clear dalvik and cache and tumbnail cache . And if you have huge archive it is completely normal .

---------- Post added at 12:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 PM ----------

Best experience so far with 1.6a . Thanks man .
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] mehdi.moha:
+1 , i have the same lag , when i scroll in home scren

but that was perfect in version 1.6

any way , thank u googy , the kernel is #1
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] SaschaHa:
As the Galaxy Tab S2 might have an Exynos 5433 with 64 bit functionality, would it be possible (with the new source drivers) to activate this functionality for our Note 4?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sapphire999:
I'm also interested in it. But need some kind of CPU/chipset hacking I guess. More over, 64 bit system required then to use 64 bit functionality. So its possible I guess, but a big work.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] SaschaHa:
Isn't Android 5.x+ 64 bit by default? Maybe for CM12.1 that would be great ;)
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] white7561:
Sorry but, what the advantage of 64bit on note 4? Cause of we only have 3gb ram? Someone pls kindly replay :) thx
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] SaschaHa:
We can say "only" just because TouchWiz is full of crap :D 3GB should be more than enough if Samsung would optimize the framework for a better ram management.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] m.4_ts@yahoo.com:
S6 and s6 edge also have "ONLY" 3gb of ram but ran on 64 bit.. so?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] SaschaHa:
I'm against Samsung phones too since the last few monts as they sh*t on their buyer. But Samsung makes the best hardware for me (camera quality and displays) so that are the best phones for me. Only the software is the big problem.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] omarmeleis:
Samsung may have the beat hardware, BUT i have a 700 dollar flagship that takes almost 2 seconds to show the recent apps, my brother's 2 year old nexus 5 which is only 300 bucks is much faster and smoother than my note 4. Since i have the exynos version there are no AOSP roms available
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Bahaa.Aly:
Stweaks dosn't work on stock rom

There is a strange thing happened when I installed 1.6a version to stock rooted .

The stweaks takes long to open ,when it does every slider set to the lowest value

and profile set to battery.

This is strange because it was working normally when using simple rim! !!!!!

Can someone help me????
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
Uninstall stweaks and busybox then reboot to recovery and reflash 1.6a

Envoyé de mon SM-N910C en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] SaschaHa:
To my mind no company made a worse job by creating their own software like Samsung. Some years ago TouchWiz was ok, as it was different, but not worse than original Android. But now there are so much bugs like the recents lag, the ram management, the floating buttons and to my mind the ui. CM ist a lot better I think. Only reason for TW roms are the special features like s-pen and so on.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
I used vanilla aosp lollipop for enough time to tell that I personally don't feel comfortable with it at all. Most of my daily usual things necessitated on it twice effort as on touchwiz.

Touchwiz isn't as good as our expectations but not as bad as most of us think. It only needs to be optimized furthermore and that's what devs try to do ;)

While waiting let's start USING our phones (as they are) instead of waiting for miracles to happen ...

PS : most of lollipop 5.0.x ram problems aren't samsung fault but google's !

Envoyé de mon SM-N910C en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] SaschaHa:
I've tested CM12.1 and for me there were much differences regarding the ram management. I could use more than 10 apps in background without problems. On TouchWiz i can use 3 or 4, but that's it. When I use more, I get redraws and the most apps will be killed and have to reload. For me AOSP seems to be a lot faster. And I love the theme engine. I hope that Samsung will optimize their software to get it as good as CM and AOSP.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] jmcostales:
My battery drains faster on 1.6a compared to 1.5.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] DaReDeViL:
Give it one more day ... (after full charge cycle)

Envoyé de mon SM-N910C en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Bahaa.Aly:
No busyboX and uninstalled stweaks and reflashed . The same.

The problem still exist . I'm on stock rom E3. Did what you told me . The same.

Any other ideas!!!!!.

By the way thank you for your care an dedication.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sapphire999:
Why not to use custom rom? Sweetrom is good for me. Same BOE3 based
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Bahaa.Aly:
Tried simple rom , but I think too much rom manipulation usually makes it buggy.

still searching for deodexed zipaligned knox free with no other manipulation. But no luck.

any way thanks a lot.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] fabiolmm1:
thanks again fior the great kernel. when you release a kernel with undervolt??

---------- Post added at 12:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:36 AM ----------

thanks for the great kernel... for me the best kernel in terms of battery life is 1.3.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] Sapphire999:
Who denies you to set voltages manually? See Googy-Max Stweaks. By default undervolting - NO WAY!!! Cauze it's a big chance of device and component damage. If you wanna risk and ready to kill your device - set desired undervolting you like in Stweaks. But making it undervolted by default in kernel - is madness you know.

---------- Post added at 01:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:57 AM ----------

You know, I tried SimplRom, it's sooo buggy, laggy etc. Use SweetROM or WanamLite(deodexed but with stock Samsung's apps).
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] XuanTruong:
Version 1.6a very good.:good:

CPU set -50mv

GPU set -25mv

left to the default settings.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] batterytwo:
1.6a get amazing battery life. Thanks Googy.
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] vodanhdaisu:
I prefer better performace than battery life. So, what version should i use?
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] white7561:
I know!! U can just force min freq on cpu to highest and gpu to highest.. And u will get the best performance ever!! [emoji14]
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] mehdi.moha:
[MENTION=1546289]googy[/MENTION]

in the morning , when i first time unlock my phone , its lagy . i have to open Stweak-tools ==> then wait to " stweak has been granted super user permission" ==> then my phone will run well !! do u know why stweak can't wake up !
[Galaxy Note 4 Android Development (Exynos)] AndreiLux:
Just curious ... like half of the features and major commits of this kernel are actually authored by me, most of the rest by other devs, yet I don't see my or anybody else's name as credit anywhere and you even outright went on to rename some commit titles.

Is there a good reason for this?