yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Honor 6, 6 Plus Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] einstien:
Dial this code in the dialer to do a hardware check

*#*#2846579159#*#*
[Honor 6, 6 Plus Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bizz2012:
I have just tried that but in the 'Hardware Device Check' it just gives me the option to check the battery?
[Honor 6, 6 Plus Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] einstien:
The screen tests would be under Aging Related Tests

---------- Post added at 04:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

Just modified my reply. Check it out
[Honor 6, 6 Plus Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bizz2012:
Just checked and did the following tests;

LCD Aging Test = Worked fine because it is a white background it doesn't show the red and blue.

LCD Background Light = Worked good.
[Honor 6, 6 Plus Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] barriecary:
do the lcd test
[ZenFone 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] noki57oo:
Hello everyone, i recently bought a zenfone 2 (WW), but there is one thing that's bothering me, the LTE speeds.

If you check this page of the Asus internation website it says that the zenfone 2 has LTE Category 4+ for download speeds up to 250Mbit/s, and it also shows the positions of all the antennas (there are 2 antennas for the sim 1, so carrier aggregation should work). (attached file #1)

This image of the US presentation confirms the support for CA 250Mbit/s. (attached file #2)

But if you switch to the specifications page it says that it is a simple category 4 150Mbit/s. Now that is what is listed on almost every web site (cat 4 150).

Another thing is the modem, in the specifications page it says it is an intel 7262, which, if you check intel's website is a category 6 300Mbit/s modem. (attached file #3)

As you can see this is quite messy, has someone figured this out? Can someone enlighten me? Thanks for the help.
[ZenFone 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ace42:
All I can tell you is that higher speeds I've seen were around 70mbps with band 4.

"I'd Totally Hug You, If That Was Something I Did"
[ZenFone 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] noki57oo:
Thanks for the answer, here in Italy i managed to get 80Mbit/s (2600/15Mhz i believe it was), but i still don't think this is 4G+, it should almost garantee speeds of 100Mbit/s and higher. Has anyone tested it in a 4G+ area?

It's really strange that no one knows anything about this, i mean, it changes by a fair amount the longevity of this phone. I think i will probably write directly to Asus to see if they know something...
[ZenFone 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] noki57oo:
No one knows?? Crazy... I will write to Asus Italy support and try find out.
[ZenFone 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] noki57oo:
Upon further investigation i found something on the TW zentalk forum:

http://www.asus.com/zentalk/tw/forum.php?mod=redirect&goto=findpost&ptid=86120&pid=401706

Looks like someone managed to get 170Mbit/s with 4G+ network (with a Z00AD), so this would confirm the cat4+ capabilities (250Mbit/s), which both the ze551ml and the ze550ml should have (having the same intel xmm 7262 modem). More detailed specifications should have been given though....
[Android Apps and Games] marcojrfurtado:
Hello,

I would like to present Lollipop Spoofer, which can be downloaded from the Play Store.

It is a simple way to spoof the MAC Address of your device, and make it persistent across reboots.

Unlike other apps, this one will not rely on "ifconfig" bull**** (which does not work anymore, by the way).

Its usage is straighforward. First, you set your new MAC address by using Lollipop Spoofer. Then you reboot your device, and you are good to go!

You can verify that your MAC has been modified by checking "Settings > About phone > Status > Wi-Fi MAC address".

In case you want to revert to your original address, the app will allow you to back it up.

Enjoy!
[Android Apps and Games] jdstrydom:
For me on AICP 9 Android 5.1.1 it opens, asks for root, and just displays a white page. Will change theme and check again

Edit. Not the theme. White page persists.

---------- Post added at 08:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:44 AM ----------

logcat entries

563: Unit not found

06-03 08:48:09.316 3100 3100 I Timeline: Timeline: Activity_launch_request id:com.antoniocarlos.mac_spoofer time:6576830

06-03 08:48:09.316 901 1816 I ActivityManager: START u0 {act=android.intent.action.MAIN cat=[android.intent.category.LAUNCHER] flg=0x10200000 cmp=com.antoniocarlos.mac_spoofer/.MainActivity (has extras)} from uid 10057 on display 0

06-03 08:48:12.666 1262 1262 W Settings: Setting adb_enabled has moved from android.provider.Settings.Secure to android.provider.Settings.Global, returning global URI.

06-03 08:48:12.706 1262 1262 W ResourceType: No package identifier when getting value for resource number 0x00000000

06-03 08:48:12.706 1262 1262 W PackageManager: Failure retrieving resources for com.antoniocarlos.mac_spoofer: Resource ID #0x0

06-03 08:48:12.716 1262 1262 W ResourceType: No package identifier when getting value for resource number 0x00000000

06-03 08:48:12.716 1262 1262 W PackageManager: Failure retrieving resources for com.teslacoilsw.launcher: Resource ID #0x0

06-03 08:48:12.716 1262 1262 W ResourceType: No package identifier when getting value for resource number 0x00000000
[Android Apps and Games] mildlydisturbed:
HTC One M9

Ran it, white screen, nada

looking at SU logs:

system/bin/sh

/data/data/com.antoniocarloc.mac_spoofer/files/spoof.sh show-current

system/bin/sh: <stdin>[1] /data/data/data/data/com.antoniocarloc.mac_spoofer/files/spoof.sh can't execute: permission denied
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Adizzzle:
I am trying to build a rom for my Canadian S6 Edge using ArchiKitchen, but can't for the life of me find the Kernel path, nor the Modem path to begin setting up a working folder.. Can anyone help me locate this info?
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] trazfer:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=60338152

Kernel= boot

Modem= radio
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Adizzzle:
Thank you!
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ritchiejoe:
Do you think the s6 will eventually get roms not based on tw?
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Guitarfreak26:
Maybe, exynos processors have never been good for cm roms etc due to them being closed source
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Osaka_23:
I love CM and other stock based ROMs and I enjoyed my experience with Blisspop on the LG G3.

Now I have the S6 Edge, I was hoping there would be non TW based ROM but then realized I would lose a lot features. The finger print scanner might not work and the camera quality might not be as good etc. This would mean I've paid a lot money for a phone without being able to use it to it's full potential.

I had the S4 a few years back and I hated TW but not Samsung has toned it down, I don't mind it as much. I will always prefer stock based ROMs but I hated losing certain features.
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BenF1:
Is there not a way to tone down touchwiz but keep it as a base? As in de-bloat as much as we can without losing the functionality of camera and fingerprint sensor? Just an idea...
[Galaxy S6 Edge Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lonelydra:
Correct me if im wrong.

But at least 2 rom in development forum has all you said.

(sorry for bad english)
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] monkey_knight:
Sorry if this is another noobish question, but since I've been experimenting with cooking in the CORE Kitchen lately, I was wondering, are the files in the SYS and OEM parts of the kitchen interchangeable? I've been recently trying to use the ingenetic's rom to install the basic options that I would like (I don't use bt, so most of those features aren't needed), and noticed that some information appears to be in the SYS folder by default when dumping the rom.

an example would be something like the comm manager, which appears to already have some files in the SYS folder, but there was an htc option to click off on build os, since i think the oem package had it listed (part of the oem package download in the same thread as the kitchen). also the files for office appear to be pre-existing in the sys folder, so was wondering if the build os checkbox meant anything...

I've tried cooking roms with the options checked off and on and haven't noticed any differences, because the roms usually ended up being built and flashable, but the roms always came out screwed up. (office shortcuts would not appear, although they could be run from the \windows directory or an option to put the date information on 1 line didn't work).

I'll probably try to figure out how to use faria's kitchen and try to make the same mods, since it looks like the cookers themselves seem to have been using that kitchen for their original builds...
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] mfrazzz:
One thing you will find out is all the kitchens (at the lowest levels) are basically the same since they all use the same set of tools. Where the differences come is just layouts (and even then, they are still all pretty close. Core Kitchen is probably the one that is the most different, and thats just because its been laid out very logically (and not just hacked together IMO) and scripts and shortcuts setup to make it all look and feel like a nice organized set of tools. I've been using Core Kitchen mainly since Crossbow Reloaded 1.7 and I really like the layout and all. But definetly try other kitchens so you can see how they all came from the same roots (and you start to realize how this all fits together).

As for OEM and SYS... Well SYS is supposed to be what the base rom is. And OEM is the add on packages. But different cookers do things differently. I'll admit that I get sloppy sometimes and will drag stuff out of SYS and into OEM if I'm completely changing it, or sometime I edit stuff directly in SYS and maybe make rgu or initflashfile stuff for it over in OEM (so yeah, anyone dumping my roms may find some odd things in odd places. Sorry, it makes sense for me at the time I worked on it, and some of it is tricks / techniques that I've seen in Faria's stuff).

So yeah, I guess you could say OEM and SYS are interchangable. In my ROM Windows LIve stuff is in OEM since it was brought from elsewhere (but then Office was brought from elsewhere but I left it in SYS as I had issues when I tried to move it).

Good luck!
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] monkey_knight:
lol...coincidentally the base roms i was using look like they were from you...both your tweaked version of the base wm6 from ingenetics and xm6. maybe that's what causing all these error messages to popup when i try to buildos. says it already has files here and there.

if you have experience with core kitchen, would you know if i can still flash the file that is created, even if the error message pops up? the error that i usually get in buildos is that the file already exist elsewhere (though i need to play with a bit more to figure why, since i can't find the file in more than one location when i do a search). not sure if buildos finishes its build or it just stops (the included tutorial says to try to fix the error and not continue flashing...but just curious).

anyway, it looks like there was another version of the base ingenetics rom in the forum posting, so I'm gonna try tossing that into the core kitchen to see if i get the same errors in trying to cook it.

thx for the comments.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] anichillus:
First of all, i want to say thanks mfrazzz for the nice words...i apreciate it !

Second ...if it gives you any error then the product is corrupted, that is very easy to understand...Because when Build OS encountered an error it stopped and won't go trough with the whole process. So if any errors, abort and check the log and fix what can be fixed.
[8125, K-JAM, P4300, MDA Vario ROM Development] mfrazzz:
Yeah, if it says that the file is already there, then you have to stop and find out where the duplicates are. Most likely there are files in OEM and in SYS with the same name. You then have to figure out which you want and remove the other (or rename it and then in initflashfile.txt change the name back to what you want when you move it to a different directory).

But if you get errors, (duplicate files, hive not created) or the like, you have to stop! You can't move on as things didn't complete.

If you want a clean version, then use the Ingenetics base and the packages that matt put together. Thats all made to work together. If you start with my base, then you have to keep moving forward from there, and I threw XM6 and the first version of Ingenetics together in a matter of hours so they are not laid out very well. Part of what I want to do with this next XM6 is take my time and do this one right (but I was trying to get that base out to the masses and get a better working Crossbow Reloaded 1.7 type rom on it, and wasn't thinking of people using it to start their own cooking with either of them ;)).
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] chobits:
I know it says Sony / Samsung

MI4i camera in indoor situation is like having so many angry ants brawling (noise is messed up)

and some said that it might be samsung sensor since it has so much noise

the sony one isn't making such noise

Dunno if it's true or not

no proof no picture so far

But indeed the camera result is way too noisy indoor
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] 111kaustav111:
any app to check which sensor got shipped with my piece??
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] Techno_Funky:
Can confirm the camera is too noisy indoors.
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] aj.guyver:
It's true. Too much noise!
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] chobits:
did the new update 6.5.6 have any effect on the camera noise?

some already got it but mine hasn't
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] doc_v15:
Not mine...indoor pic is good
[Xiaomi Mi 4i] asharma7:
Camera is excellent.... slow motion video recording is awesome...

A Sharma

Sharing is power
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] PanchoPonceN:
Hello!

In the forums there are some really good ROM options. Because I like to be as slim as possible with the software on my phone, I prefer vanilla-like ROMs. In this case, there are two for the Moto G that seem very similar, and I would like someone to tell me the differences. One is the GPE ROM made by lost101. The other one is an AOSP build made by Alberto97.

I can understand that a difference are the apps included on each ROM. But as I can modify those after installing any of the ROMs, I would like to know if there are any technical differences between them (like drivers or internal code optimizations), something that goes beyond UI or apps. I would like the get the "fastest performance".

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nekobibu:
I am not able to go into detail but I can tell you that the GPE one, since it's based on an official release by Motorola, is much more stable and trustworthy for me. I've tested countless roms and the optimized GPE one by lost101 is by far the best. Other roms are built from scratch by excellent devs, but they always end up having various problems for me... Apps that don't work the way they should, bloatware, missing or cryptic features...

Anyway, that is just my opinion.

;)
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AndyYan:
Although I don't know why, GPE includes some proprietary frameworks and stuff, and therefore is pretty large and heavy. You might not feel it when using, though.

As for me, I'll recommend AOSP any day. Not even CM, if you want to be as light as possible.

Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM12.1

[WARNING: XDA Premium 4.0.13+ lacks Signature function - do not update]
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Niropa:
GPE is Motorola's version of AOSP with their own additions like proprietary drivers and apps. AOSP is the base of all Android ROMs so its as minimal as you can get
[Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] PanchoPonceN:
Thanks, everyone!

From your answers, I understand that the GPE version includes proprietary software from Motorola. I would suppose that these changes are for optimizations on performance and stability, so I think I will go with that as in the end the experience should be improved with those, right?
[About XDA developers] Hannah Stern:
Hello, all XDA-Users.

I know, most users know this, but not every XDA-Member…

I'd really like to say something here:

I truly see too many XDA-Users, that simply post something, without thinking about the fact, that somebody maybe overlook/misses your post.

Well, this is OK, but not, if the post is for a specific user.

If somebody wants to reply/say something to another user, without Quoting a Post of the user or mentioning somebody with [MENTION=4799497][Username][/MENTION]; the [Username] will

not be notificated.

That will cause, that there's an extremely low chance, that [Username] will read the post. Maybe he/she looks at the thread at a random moment or recieves a private message etc. Maybe the Member is subscribed to the thread and takes a look randomlý.

But,

If you talk to somebody, please make use of the

Quote/Mention

-Feature‼

I'm saying this to anybody, who is a member on XDA-Developers.

​

I hope, everybody will use the QUOTE/MENTION-Feature in future if neccesary and i also hope, it helped. ;)

Thanks to all XDA-Users. :)
[About XDA developers] NOOK!E:
Thanks for this. Something needed to be said. :good:
[About XDA developers] Hannah Stern:
I remember your signature once to have a text similar to the following one:

„If you want me to read your post, please either Quote/Reply to my post or type/paste @ИΘΘK¡€ in your post.“

Thanks for your reply :)

Many members actually forget to use Quote/Mention.
[About XDA developers] Hannah Stern:
I think, it makes sense to put this into the Non-Urgent Forum rules.

I've seen another post, where Quoting/Mentioning isn't used.
[About XDA developers] NOOK!E:
[MENTION=6011384]Hannah Stern[/MENTION], I believe this thread would be a better place for the recommendation you posted above - that way the mods can see it and consider it. :)
[About XDA developers] caiocaetano:
trying to learn how to quote >.<
[About XDA developers] prashanth_:
[MENTION]6011384[/MENTION] [MENTION=6011384]Hannah Stern[/MENTION] So it sends them a notification, yet the username doesn't become a clickable link?

And no problem if the username has spaces in between?

*Edit: The username becomes a clickable link, and it appears that spaces in the username isn't a problem, when using with @

Even if you use the @ option, it automatically changes to mention option which you can see by editing the post.

Also, the correct way to use the Mention option is

and not

as mentioned in the original post.
[About XDA developers] Krishna Badgujar:
[MENTION=6776972]Krishna Badgujar[/MENTION]
[About XDA developers] jason66777:
hi
[About XDA developers] ThinnerMetalX:
[MENTION=6011384]Hannah Stern[/MENTION]

Just testing mention :)
[About XDA developers] Pradyumna26:
Thanks!
[About XDA developers] Zoandroid:
[MENTION=3295751]Zoandroid[/MENTION]
[About XDA developers] Smyl3:
[MENTION=5051389]Smyl3[/MENTION]

doesn't show in preview
[About XDA developers] Zacky.gates777:
[MENTION=8064493]Zacky.gates777[/MENTION]
[About XDA developers] akky26:
[mention]5700705[/mention]
[About XDA developers] Jhonzx:
[MENTION=6011384]Hannah Stern[/MENTION]

I'm just testing.
[About XDA developers] sd_shadow:
No it's like this

[Mention=74466237]akky26[/Mention]
[About XDA developers] thugslug:
It should be obvious to me, but it isn't - is there and quick icon to apply the mention tags, or do you have to type the whole thing in? Thanks :)

Edit: sorry I was tired when posted this. Penny dropped.. [MENTION=8957402]thugslug[/MENTION]
[About XDA developers] __Andrew_:
[MENTION=XDA-Member-ID] [MENTION=8951310]__Andrew_[/MENTION] [/MENTION ]

@[__Andrew_]

Just testing
[About XDA developers] Sagar Sharma01:
just checking

[MENTION=6011384]Hannah Stern[/MENTION]

[MENTION=8981821]HannahS[/MENTION]tern

@[Hannah Stern]

@ Hannah Stern

[MENTION=6011384]HannahStern[/MENTION]
[About XDA developers] srinathrajaram:
[MENTION=8284456]srinathrajaram[/MENTION]
[About XDA developers] Sagar Sharma01:
[MENTION=1079696]hanna s[/MENTION]tern
[About XDA developers] ImYourGege:
@Gnonymous7
[Android Apps and Games] 1000rrren:
Hello all...

I posted before but can't seem to find the post now. I have prime and love the launcher with my Note 4. After the recent update I cannot figure out how to place app icons on different pages. Can someone please explain step by step the new process?
[Android Apps and Games] Magnum_Enforcer:
Your original post can be found in the link below.

http://xdaforums.com/android/help/help-how-t3119784/post60996790#post60996790

This forum is for people to post apps & games. It is not a Q&A forum.

Hint: If you click on your user name, then click on "Statistics", you will see a link to find all threads started by yourself. You can also do this via the XDA app by going to your profile, then selecting the option from the dropdown menu to find threads you've started. When a thread is moved by the moderating team, you will also receive a PM telling you that the thread has been moved.

Thread closed.
[XDA Assist] dannyr0612:
I cannot talk threw my u10 smart watch I can hear and call but can't talk anyone know how I can fix this in the upper left corner I can see a symbol of head phones how do I turn this off
[XDA Assist] sd_shadow:
i'm not seeing much for your device.

Try U10 U Watch Review - not a bad smartwatch by panteryx_26

or Start your own thread in Other SmartWatches
[G4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pvaldeben:
I cant find an option to leave home on screen button on all the time. Is it posible?
[G4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 89titanium:
Why would you want less screen for your apps? Tap or swipe down to get your buttons back. I don't believe you can lock the buttons there.
[G4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pvaldeben:
Im comming from galaxy note 2 and mis having dedicated buttons. Now its one more step to access any of the home buttons. You are right about loosing some screen size if buttons are on all the time. I would like to try both ways... If not I just have to get used to it.
[G4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pvaldeben:
Found a solution that might help others..

I installed Pie Controls and not have access to home buttons and more at thumb level. This used to need root, but not any more.

Only function that need access is the back , for this in setting go to General > Accessibility scroll dows to Services and Pie is listed as Off just turn On and back button in pie control will work.

Cheers if it helps anyone.