yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xperia SP Android Development] Starkiller564:
How to enter cLock settings? I want to change temperature unit from Fahrenheit to Celsium
[Xperia SP Android Development] creative21:
goto settings>pac> there may be clock widget settings in lockscreen or miscellaneous, i don't remember perfectly. try search
[Xperia SP Android Development] Imtiaz369:
Last build-

no mobile data

flash targine karnel...then no sim card detected

Nothing will flash by recovery....Always say failed

Any solution
[Xperia SP Android Development] creative21:
flash tangerine v2.2 from fastboot then everything will work fine.
[Xperia SP Android Development] Furrydaus:
You didn't download the latest build through my server and that you don't check anything is what I'm guessing
[Xperia SP Android Development] flash-:
yes that's right ...but i think new users will not search the thread looking for the update ...and on the main OP the version is V1 MR1 ...so i think you should say on the OP there is a new version on your server ...cuz there are two links ( the basket build one is the first one and contain only the first release of the ROM ) so it will be good if you edit the OP and put the link with second release and say here it the update :D

sorry for that man :) but not all users know how to search and destroy ( i mean search and find things ) :p
[Xperia SP Android Development] Furrydaus:
:good: Will update all my threads next Saturday and I might think of creating a mega thread to help some of the new users out
[Xperia SP Android Development] udxuler:
Mobile Data Not Working :'(

I installed the rom yesterday and its really amazing... except that mobile data is not working.

I've checked the APN settings and the SIM card is working properly (mobile data is working perfectly in other phones using the same SIM).

does anybody has a solution and i don't want to install any other rom :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 06:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:01 AM ----------

PS: i also flashed tangerine v2.2 through fastboot but still no solution
[Xperia SP Android Development] Kelinago:
furrydaus.dlinkddns.com - this site is broken, please fix it)
[Xperia SP Android Development] Furrydaus:
I'm removing support for PAC and RR soon. I'm gonna go straight to Temasek and Blisspop instead. I'll explain when the time is ripe
[Xperia SP Android Development] slim_guy:
if you don't mind can you handover rr to me? [emoji14]
[Xperia SP Android Development] TheAvengingTITAN:
Excellent choice
[Xperia SP Android Development] Furrydaus:
End of the Line Folks

PAC-ROM Support has been Dropped

Find out more here:

https://plus.google.com/109278728094234253304/posts/gHLwiwpEkZS
[Xperia SP Android Development] engloa:
Thread closed at OPs request
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tonybuzz32000:
Hi guys, I've been offered a live demo unit thats fully active and demo disabled. Is it possible to flash a firmware from Sammymobile to remove the live demo logo on startup and possibly root?
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jedikalimero:
I also have a Galaxy Note Pro ex-demo. I flashed a SM-P900 firmware from Sammobile with Odin and the device is now completely OK for regular use except for 3 things:

1- I can't delete the demo files that use up to more than 5 GB of the storage memory

2- The boot logo is still the Live Demo Unit logo

3- I can't perform a Factory data reset. Option is greyed out and if I try it at boot recovery (HOME+Vol UP+POWER), I receive an error message:

-- Warning ...

MDM does not allow factoryReset.

Phone will REBOOT automatically.

So I guess flashing the main firmware is not enough and the MDM firmware has to be flashed too, but I have no idea of where to find the correct one or how to flash it.

In short I can use the tablet normally as if it were a genuine Galaxy Note Pro WiFi except there is almost 6GB of space (maybe more) that I can't not use.
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Beut:
Try to flash with BootLoader

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=62574218&postcount=3
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Beut:
How is your tablet ? Did you try to flash with bootloader ?
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jedikalimero:
Yes! it worked! everything works as in a regular Note Pro tablet except when I turn it on, it still shows the Live Demo logo, but everything else is fine, it even has downloaded a firmware update since then!

Thank you!!:):good:
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] leyneli:
Did you flash with recovery or install on odin? And now what is write openning menu, live demo unit or samsung p 900? Thanks....
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jedikalimero:
I used the link that Beut provided above and flashed it with Odin following the instructions in the refered thread.

It has been working without problems to date. Only difference from a genuine "for sale" tablet is the boot logo.:good:
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rusty196500:
UK version

Hi any BL files or stock rom for UK version
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Desmondo12:
How do I do this? What is flashing on these things

---------- Post added at 11:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:10 PM ----------

As you can tell by my junior status to you JEDI warriors, I am new to this witch craft.

I have a note pro 12.2 p900 live demo unit.

It comes up with catalogue pics and apps and 're installs when once I restart tablet. It won't allow me to use my memory card frequently with movies but will apps. What can I do to get the demo off. Is there a step by step idiot guide somewhere
[Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Beut:
Download the firmware from here:

https://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/galaxy-note-pro/SM-P900/XAR/download/P900UES1CPL1/120031/

Power + Volume Down , then Volume Up will bring your tablet to Odin or Download Mode.

Instruction is on the download page, if you don't understand it, then watch Youtube videos how to use Odin to flash firmware
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
[KERNEL INFO] Test Battery Life Nexus 5 [Comparisons, differences and more] -> HERE

First: sorry for my bad english xD

These tests are to understand what ROM is more battery friendly .

I use code blue at all for equality in comparison

I imagine that changing custom kernel will be the same thing (the duration of the ROM)

3 things:

- This is not a topic of war. (clashes on which is better and stuff like that, we should try to avoid them)

- As usual, no one is perfect; if I make some mistakes or do you think I rate incorrectly just say so and we discuss what to improve

- There will not only test but also personal opinions

how does it work (test) -> Read!

Requirements:

- ROM installed on secondary MultiROM

- ROM "stock" without being configured and no applications (only AnTuTu tester)

- Same Build kernel to compare better.

NB: I have randomly chosen code blue

- Temperature between 24 and 26 degrees during the beginning of the test

- Same surface (table)

- Kernel "stock" without being configured (no UV etc.)

- Antutu Tester:

This application is incredible.

It isn't a benchmark scores and will explain how it works:

It allows you to test the device without you touch it!

this application always works in the same way:

- Open web pages

- Use the cpu 100%, then to 70% etc.

- It opens a test for games

- It opens a test for video and other

The test stresses our phone.

Do not expect amazing SOT. The important thing is the comparison!

[ROM]Test Battery life​

boostpop_hammerhead-ota-3.2.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details Test:

//

Euphoria-OS-1.1-hammerhead-20150428 + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details Test:

I forgot the most important screenshots: SOT is: 1h55m -> trust me

Optipop_Layers_N5-2015-05-12-GCC49.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details Test:

//

OLD TEST: (

don't compare with others above because this are with adaptive brightness

!)

Rom chroma_hammerhead-ota-2015-04-10.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Rom Euphoria-OS-1.1-hammerhead-20150331.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Rom Rastapop_rascarlo_hammerhead-ota-2015-04-14 + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

Rom Purity_hammerhead_ota_2015-04-13.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

Rom terminus_hammerhead-ota-2015-04-12.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

Rom OptiPop_5.1_Layers_N5-2015-04-13-GCC49.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

Rom Screw'd_hammerhead-1.1.0-OFFICIAL-20150419-1630.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

Rom boostpop_hammerhead-ota-3.2.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

Rom Resurrection Remix_LP_v5.4.2-20150419-hammerhead.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

Rom CataclysmApr_14_2015-HAMMERHEAD-Lollipop-5.1.0_r3_Stable.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

//

Rom blisspop-v3.2-hammerhead-NIGHTLY-20150426-1219.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

Rom Dirty Unicorns_hammerhead_5.1.1_20150426-2219.v9.3-OFFICIAL.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

//
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
[ROM]Test Battery life EXTRA​

Factory Stock Google 5.1 + Kernel Stock Google

Details test:

//

boostpop_hammerhead-ota-3.2.zip + Kernel Stock Build-in

Details Test:

//

Euphoria-OS-1.1-hammerhead-20150428 + Kernel Stock Build-in

Details Test:

//

Optipop_Layers_N5-2015-05-12-GCC49.zip + Kernel Stock Build-in

Details Test:

//

Optipop_Layers_N5-2015-05-12-GCC49.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923 (governor: ondemand - scheduler: noop)

Details Test:

//

OLD TEST: (

don't compare with others above because this are with adaptive brightness

!)

As we have seen, these ROMs are more or less all the same battery life with the same custom kernel.

The kernel is the thing that affects more.

For this reason, I would try some stock kernel built in .

For example, look at the example:

boostpop + kernel code blue VS boostpop + stock kernel built in.

There's a big difference :)

Rom Factory Stock Google 5.1 + Kernel Code Blue r923

Details test:

//

Rom boostpop_hammerhead-ota-3.2.zip + Kernel Stock ROM built-in

Details test:

//
[Nexus 5 General] rap1em:
I didn't knew that the stock Kernel was that good O.o
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
confirm.

The truth is that now the modding is a passion; a hobby.

Currently I saw ROM faster than factory google.

But as battery, google is the best.

I use the ROM because I love customizations. I lose something in battery life, but I feel good.

But if you only want a better battery, I suggest you go back on stock google

(canceled. I did it at night and adaptive brightness ruined everything. I will disable it)
[Nexus 5 General] rap1em:
I prefer custom ROMs too (I love Chroma). But what do you suggest me, Stock kernel or CodeBlue?
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
I should do: Rom chroma_hammerhead-ota-2015-04-10.zip + Kernel Stock ROM built-in

When i finished, you can figure out which is best in battery. (code blue or kernel stock ROM)

A note:

usually, the kernel built-in ROM, have fewer customizations. (no dt2w, no faux audio and others).

The kernel of chroma not remember
[Nexus 5 General] askor:
Big like for you because u spend long time to test it. I'm impressed how Google kernel is battery friendly. I just installed stock from cataclysm. I hope it's the same.

Wysłane z mojego Nexus 5 przy użyciu Tapatalka
[Nexus 5 General] KyraOfFire:
Can you please maybe give Franco a try?
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
I have also tested all the kernels with the same rom. (for a better compare)

Screw'd + Franco

Screw'd + Hells Core

Screw'd + Code Blude

Screw'd + Elemental x

and more....

The problem? tests are old.

When i will start those test, i'll create a new topic about the custom kernel ;) (If I have time)

PS: if you want to know the old test, please send me a pm xP
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
hey guys.

i've added a new test: factory google + kernel stock.

I am sorry.

The last test was wrong. Now it's correct ;)

The adaptive brightness ruined everything.

I'll have to do boostpop + code blue again and others

Also the story that google is the best battery friendly is false.

Now, everything is possible.

Stay tuned xD

Rom Factory Stock Google 5.1 + Kernel Stock Google

Details test:

//
[Nexus 5 General] bblzd:
Thanks for your testing. This is the only one that seems to have extended the battery time, but I can't understand why. You tested the same ROM and the same kernel in other configurations and did not see any increase, how come boostpop + stock kernel can go for longer? This seems unlikely.
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
nope, i tested the same ROM with code blue. This test is with a stock kernel built-in rom.

it doesn't the same like kernel stock from factory image google.

anyway, the last test (except the last) are made with adaptive brightness. This I did not like. I'll have to make up and turn it off. The positive thing, however, is that they were made in the same times more or less (same light), then the same are accurate.

Deactivating the adaptive brightness, the result will overwrite the current one. Will surely change but now you know why

In short, the new tests should not be compared with the old.

at times, I tried to repeat the various tests and gave the same result, so I am happy and I hope it will be useful :)
[Nexus 5 General] bblzd:
It's just that stock Kernel + Stock ROM don't see the longer battery time. Only Stock Kernel + Boostpop ROM. So are you saying that somehow Boostpop ROM can extend battery time, but only when used with Stock Kernel yet stock kernel with another ROM does not? I think something is off with that measurement there, was it with a different brightness level as well perhaps?

Otherwise everything being the same with each kernel and ROM is exactly what I would expect with such a workload (constant, heavy, benchmark).

The reason why custom kernels can increase battery life is by reducing performance using different CPU governors. However those should only come into affect with lighter work loads where the CPU doesn't max itself out. ROMs on the other hand, have nothing really battery wise.
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
I agree with you in everything.

I'm pretty sure that if you use the Kerner built into the BoostPop ROM to another rom, you would get benefits.

Currently, I believe that only boostpop has that kind of kernel. (I would not say things that are not true)

Unfortunately, I'm not good with English and this doesn't allow me to express well.

Sorry and be patient xD

I read many times people who say: "how is the battery life on this ROM?"

I believe that all these AOSP, factory rom (such as cataclysm, pure white) stock google ... , more or less, are all the same in battery.

It is also seen in the test!

In my opinion, the most important thing is the kernel.

I'm just comparing some stock kernel built into the ROM with code blue kernel

for now, the various stock kernels have better battery life than code blue. also the kernel of google.

I know, also it depends on governors etc. but not all change it. many use the default governor

it will be interesting, when I return to try the same ROM with different kernel.
[Nexus 5 General] amitkapate:
Battery stats and benchmark score on video review

Hey guys checkout this video review of N5X rom.....I have tested five different kernel with this rom. All the comparison between battery stats and benchmark scores are shown......

link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSPWBybFzPo

Check it out....
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
hi

I'm not dead.

I'm testing the ROM hidden

Why?

because the new tests should not be compared with previous ones. This reason because now i have disabled adaptive brightness and everything will be more accurate.

i will add coming soon when there will be many tests. so we don't confuses

There will be results with SOT lower. you are not afraid, it is normal. I increased the brightness and the results are lower;)

For now, i have tested:

Factory google 5.1 + stock kernel (in OP)

boostpop + kernel code blue

boostpop + kernel stock built in

euphoria + kernel code blue

euphoria + kernel stock built in
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
Update OP

The tests are more or less the same.

For this reason, I decided to slow down.

kernel is the most important for battery life and i've open a new topic -> http://xdaforums.com/google-nexus-5...st-battery-life-nexus-5-t3108824#post60744006

While I wait the new update of screw'd ROM (for kernel test), i will test new rom such us Cataclysm (rom factory that i miss) and ... bho ... i don't know :laugh:
[Nexus 5 General] natsuke:
Is that showing all the stock kernels are better than the codeblue?

I can't really see those images, they were very small.
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
yes, for now .. the governor of the stock kernel tested, pass code blue.

No small :(

I see them with good size. it's strange
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
i can see them just fine. strange that stock kernel gives better battery...could you please repeat one of the tests made with custom kernel(code blue for example) but this time with ondemand governor + noop scheduler to see if there is any difference?
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
changing configuration, surely the test will be different. I use configurations stock because many users do not change anything. change is for advanced users. However, I'll try if I have time;)
[Nexus 5 General] sheshuvadrevu:
Awesome result

I have tested Chroma rom + Google's factory kernel, without any modifications for kernel settings. Results were astonishing i got the best for my usage, i got 4.30 hrs of sot. Previously with every other combination of kernel and rom, i got only max of 3.30 sot. So I strongly suggest to try this combination Chroma rom with google stock kernel.
[Nexus 5 General] pk-sanja:
[MENTION=4989099]sheshuvadrevu[/MENTION] where to geht the stock kernel? Thanks
[Nexus 5 General] sheshuvadrevu:
I have installed stock kernel 5.1 through multirom, that is easiest way... or you can apps like flashify ...
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
Here

Optipop_Layers_N5-2015-05-12-GCC49.zip + Kernel Code Blue r923 (governor: ondemand - scheduler: noop)

Details Test:

//
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
I don't understand how can stock Google kernel be better than custom ones, because if you guys check cpu states, Google keeps the cpu at considerably higher frequencies than with custom kernels...what else can impact battery life?
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
Maybe other custom kernels, run better.

RACER, hells core ... running with frequency as 192Mhz (minimum). I try them too.

However, try Cool Tool (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ds.cpuoverlay&hl=it) ,set temperature and frequency and show panel in status bar.

you will realize that Codeblue uses more or less the same frequencies during the test.

I don't know. surely there is something else.

What I notice is that my battery lasts longer with stock kernel than Codeblue. I noticed several times and over.

I don't know. I simply try
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
but thats my point exactly, it does not seem to matter that custom kernels run the cpu at lower frequencies because google's kernel keep the cpu at higher frequencies and still seems to give better battery life
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
Yes. It is curious.

To be more precise:

The only test with kernel stock google is this: Factory Stock Google + 5.1 Kernel Stock Google .

other test are made with a kernel stock built in the rom

I'm not a developer but I remember that someone talked about this:

Google is always google. his developers are a genius and is possible that with ROM (aosp etc.) many things are lost.

I'm not sure about that. I talk about it ...

You've intrigued too xD

Now, I try Optipop with stock GOOGLE 5.1 kernel (not kernel built in)

Question: it's possible? right? someone has a zip file? ok, flashify.
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
I used flashify to flash boot.img from the Google factory image! Download the image from Google website and extract boot.img and transfer it to your phone and use flashify
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
on multirom, exatly?

i don't want set on primary but secondary
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
You don't need to use multirom! Flashify flashes the Google kernel and replaces yours
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
I would install kernel stock google on secondary rom (multirom) with optipop

on primary i have screw'd + hellscore. i will not touch it

i need multirom :/
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
Oh I see, in that case I can't help you, only used multirom once and don't remember it well=p
[Nexus 5 General] adichandra:
Im on chroma 5.1.1 lollipop aosp based. It includes franco kernel as default. Can i use the boot.img extracted from 5.1 google factory image? Because i believe 5.1.1 official has not been released yet for nexus 5.
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
yep, nothing problem...

you could use flashify or multirom for example
[Nexus 5 General] Blackbox421:
Hm, maybe the kernels still aren't 100% optimized to lollipop? Just a suggestion :)

Can you maybe try stock ROM (4.4) + stock kernel and stock ROM (4.4) + codeblue? Just for a reference.
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
yes why not ..

someone has a factory ROM compatible with MultiROM?

like this: http://xdaforums.com/google-nexus-5/general/rom-n5-l-developer-preview-t2796003/post59698354

EDIT: good! http://xdaforums.com/google-nexus-5/development/rom-stock-4-4-3-ktu84m-odex-deodex-t2771010

see you later ;)
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
this test does not seem to be very precise...i ran it yesterday(was actually running to deplete my battery). Ran it 2 times. On the first one it scored around 3500 and then on the 2nd it scored around 4400. I didnt change anything, didnt even reboot the phone

btw whats your procedure?do you dirty flash the rom and only then flash the new kernel or you flash it without dirty flashing the rom?
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
My procedure is in OP

I tried the test several times (same configuration) -> same result

- Every test I do after FULL WIPE

- Without applications (they can affect very testing. App background, app in memory etc. )

- Stock Configurations

- Same Temperature! (this is important)

- ROM installed on secondary MultiROM

- Same Build kernel to compare better.

- Same surface (table)

- Kernel "stock" without being configured (no UV etc.)

as I said, always same results ...

for which, it seems precise to me ;)
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
it didnt seem very accurate to me because i got two completely different results in consecutive tests...and the first one was lower. If it was the opposite i could say it was due to thermal throttling, but since it had already ran one test, if it was heat related the second test would score lower...maybe it was just a one time thing i dont know
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
You have testest with whatsapp and others similar app?

Have you tried the last option? (the one that sucks 80%)

Then you have reloaded back to 100% and you retested. right?

The fact that you have tested two times consecutive, not a good sign.

Many things can change. really many. Also the percentage of charge (what it's charged ... after 100% I always expect 30 minutes.)

Precisely for this reason I always do the same and after full wipe

Look at all my tests ... all the same and I tried other devices.

How can they not be accurate if I get results for my use, truthful.

However, i don't know.

for me, they are accurate because they are giving me reason, every time I try a new ROM / kernel.

If you are not sure, no problem :)
[Nexus 5 General] migueldbr:
i did the 4% test twice, and im only referring to the score when im saying it does not seem accurate. Nevermind, probably a one time thing or something i dont know
[Nexus 5 General] fabi_92:
I think this is the cause.

The only reliable test, my opinion is that 80%, because it manages the entire charge cycle.

My devices (I also read many times that by others) does not spend battery in the same way

From 100% to 90% consume in a way

From 90% to 80% consume in another way and so on.

Are examples. I don't know when they spend less or more but i noticed this with my use.

Try to start the test as i do.

Or, you can try to start the 4% test at the same percentage of charge (several cycles) -> about this, however, I am not sure it is accurate but you can try;)