yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mosespl:
On other phones do you have similar problem or only on s6?

Wysłane z mojego SM-G920F przy użyciu Tapatalka
[Galaxy S6 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Blackroc86:
My S6 W8 on Telus loses signal and usually requires a reboot to get it to hook up again. Never had a cell phone that behaved like this before.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] kuailan:
Anyone try this app from Samsung?? (You can download for Samsung app store) Seem like it's not working on rooted Loly? It claimed that I am not using original samsung software? and just shut down itself.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] Bluecham:
Works good on my Edge. I'm using the free version.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] kuailan:
Is your edge rooted???
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] DudePharaoh:
works fine on my rooted edge.. the app came with the phone.. i guess its the free version.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] kuailan:
Hmmm...strange i cant seem to get it run on mine. Keep saying its not supported on non samsung official firmware. I thought it must be the root that causing the issue. I will try to unroot see if it work. .

update: I reflash my firmware to unroot....and it does work! I am really unsure how you managed to get your Music to work with rooted firmware?? even if it comes with the phone....It seem like this app can detect whether the firmware has been modified or not (in this case root). Once I rooted, it stop working.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] Bluecham:
No, I'm on AT&T. No root available.

But yes, this app was originally designed only for Samsung and therefore can detect altered roms, etc.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] ebe01:
Works fine on my rooted sprint edge

Sent from my SM-N915P
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] astrosplatt:
On rooted T-Mobile with custom ROM and never had an issue with Milk.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] DionWhite33:
Same here..TmobilE Edge ...no problems...rooted with Hylerdrive Rom
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] DAD12345:
I love it
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] parvizchitsaz:
any time i try it the app says you are out side of us and we cant support you :|
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] bignibb:
Mine didn't work for a couple of days so I Uninstalled and reinstalled it and it now works
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] KDKobes:
For future reference; Install Xposed if not already then download RootCloak from the "download" section. Once downloaded go into the RootCloak app and check the box for the app/apps you want.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] ddmmh:
Tried this on my Galaxy Tab S and couldn't get it to work. With rootcloak on it crashes on bootup and without it I get the generica non-samsung firmware error. Any other ideas? thanks

---------- Post added at 04:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:16 AM ----------

Ok further to my last post, I was able to get milk loaded using a module in xposed called 'Chocolate Milk'. Please note if you use this module you will need to sideload(not install from the appstore) MILK to get this working, good luck!
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] that_guy90:
Working great on rooted sprint. Love this app i use it everyday.
[Note Edge Themes and Apps] GODSPD:
only available in the United States... anyway to bypass this?
[General Topics] waterplanet:
I did some testing with the formula for values D = 0.000444 and L = 0.9^-y. Here are some examples:

Case 1: Initial battery life of 12 hours.

Currently my own battery life is approximately 12 hours. I wanted to see how it will develop if I keep the phone and battery one and two years longer:

After one year: 7 hours

After two years: 3 hours

Case 2: Initial battery life of one day (24 hours).

Many owners of new smartphones report a battery life of approximately 24 hours for a spanking new phone. I tried out the formula to check what they can expect when the phone and battery start to age:

One year: 18 hours

Two years: 12 hours

Three years: 8 hours

Case 3: Initial battery life of two days (48 hours).

I have seen some people claim very impressive battery life of their phones, up to two days on average. I find this a bit hard to believe, but lets use this number in the last example:

One year: 40 hours

Two years: 32 hours

Three years: 25 hours

Conclusions:

The first observation I make is that battery degradation is a much bigger issue for users that experience a poor battery life from the beginning. If you buy a new phone and the battery life is very good (40 hours or more), then battery will probably never really be a problem to you. In example three the battery life is acceptable even after three years. In the first example on the other hand the phone is mostly unusable after just one year. So the conclusion is that if a phone has a very good battery life from the start, then it's less important to make it removable. On the other hand, if the battery life is bad (or short) from the start, the battery should be removable to make necessary battery service easy for the user. So OEM's have the options of either putting in really large non-removable batteries or smaller removable batteries.
[General Topics] SymbianRefugee:
I'd say it would be hard due to different qualities and manufacturers.

For instance I have had a Nokia N8 and N808 that I got new batteries for each after 3 years, there was no discernable difference between the old and the new batteries, and these were used daily.

Whereas I've seen Chinese batteries with noticeable losses in 6 months.

But then Nokia didn't build obsolescence into their hardware like many seem to do these days.
[General Topics] waterplanet:
Maybe the batteries of those phones where more resistant to degradation than other smartphone batteries, but I don't think its possible to have zero degradation over three years with normal usage. Its like saying that you charged the phone fully, and three days later it still had 100% charge.

I have never done "scientific" testing of how much my battery life has degraded, but I have the following information available:

The battery life of my S2 with the stock 1650 battery is approximately 12 hours with normal usage.

I have another larger battery with 3500 mAh capacity, that logically

should

give me a battery life of 12 hours * 3500/1650 = 25 hours.

However, I have tested the battery for a while now, and it only gives me approximately 15 hours. Thus 10 hours less that it should have given me. Still a lot better than the stock, but not as much better as i should have been.

I think the explanation is due to battery degradation. I have been using the larger battery a lot more than the stock battery, so it has lost more of its capacity. I think the 3500 battery gave me approximately 25 hours when it was new out of the box, and I think I have been using it for a couple of years now. The stock battery I have been using a lot less, maybe 6 months or so, thus it has not lost much of its capacity. So the large battery has lost 10 hours in two years, which is not so far from the predictions from the formula.
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] EUREKAnewb:
Well... The Z4 may be a disappointment for some people, but something seems a little strange about this release. This is found on the japanese site of Sony: http://www.sonymobile.co.jp/company/press/entry/2015/0420_1_xperia_z4.html

'The product is a product aimed at completing the form of Xperia Z series.'

It suggests that Sony is ending the Z series :(

.

.

.

Fortunately, I theorize things may not be ending badly like this. Last year when Sony was hacked, emails regarding a new concept was leaked, as shown below:

http://www.xperiablog.net/2015/04/18/is-sony-working-on-an-all-metal-xperia-flagship-multiple-official-concept-images-leak/

The 'Y' series. Maybe Sony is going from Z to Y to X and so on? I think Sony is ditching 'Z' for the 'Y' series, which explains the crummy upgrade from the Z3 to Z4...
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] Mobe1969:
Yeah I liked the metal look of that Y pic. I hope the rear is same.

I can't read that line on the Sony pic you posted though. It is too small fuzzy and low res.
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] sfkaudi:
http://www.sonymobile.co.jp/company/press/entry/2015/0420_1_xperia_z4.html

Here you go

Just translate it to English
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] helpmejeebus:
Real shame if true as the z series is one of the best android designs
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] ajent:
I was hoping to grab a Z4 to replace my Oneplus. 2 features I miss are waterproof, or IR blaster, so i'd upgrade from oneplus to get one of those. I was upset to see the Z4 was Japan only, but if what you think is true, i'll be glad to wait.
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] sorceforge:
I think the machine translator gave you a wrong interpretion;

Even if I studied Japanese just a little bit, I could sense that the original text '本商品は、Xperia Zシリーズの完成形を目指した商品です。' could mean 'We aimed to make an ultimate Z series phone.' rather than 'We aimed to make the end of the line.'
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] Geeks Empire:
Info

Good news for me ;)

i like to see something new; new design, new policy for features and hardware and etc

so new series means wht i want

:good:
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] chris mackenzy:
Xperia Z series remained one of the successful range of xperia, i think they will carry on with this but in case they are planning to end it even then I am convinced that they must be bringing something that will outclass even the Z series.
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] devguruXochitl:
Happy news for all. We hope "Y" series will more attractive ever series. wish it all the best future.:good:
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] dianestory2:
Pardon me, but is this phone going to be only in Japan? I was hoping to get this in the states- is that not going to be an option?
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] Rajeev:
I think its only for Japan... But after release u can buy it from online stores.. I mean imported mobiles...
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] kelvintan133:
It would be sad tho. If they end the Z series. Personally i like Sony smartphones cause of the Z series only.
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] rina09:
I am also looking for the exciting "y" series on this version.
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] dianestory2:
Even if I did that, it would be like impossible to get accessories for it in the states, since there would be no demand (other than me)
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] soorajchemm:
Xperia Z to Y

May be. But the new "Y" series could be more advanced than the old Z. That can't just keep on continue Z5, Z6,.....Z100. For their business, Sony has to change their models and designs according to the tend and technology...
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] Tize.:
No I, if the galaxy S6 is better. Just best that can be wet? :silly:
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] icesilver18:
I would not want Sony end their Z series, coz' I am patiently waiting for the Z5 this year.

Z4 for me is a bit disappointing, its just a little upgrade from the Z3.

I hope they will release Z5 with a whole new level of flagship phone! :good::fingers-crossed:
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] sims.ns88:
I would be more than happy if they end the Z series and bring something new. From Z to Z4 they all look quite identical and after using Xperia Z and Xperia Z2, I'm not interested to buy the next Flagship with the same design.
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] meetkalamar:
Is Y the lavender concept?

That's really similar to what we see in lavender
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] dianestory2:
I just heard that they will be releasing it in USA, only under the name Z3+!! Woohoo!!
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] cyanogenmod12.ts:
does it matter if we don't have a Z series. Aren't the other phones they make just as good?
[Xperia Z4/Z3+ General] andrewlorisy:
Yes, it is true. But I hope that Sony does not quit from android market.
[G3 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahmed77t:
my phone stuck on lg logo

i want solution , if there are way without earseing better for me
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
this is it ...........thanks everybody for days and days of work...........http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=60415124&postcount=245

works with nce apk also.........everyone should be familar with ss same steps as above only from safestrap
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Nyxerosoir:
http://xdaforums.com/att-galaxy-s5/general/experimental-flashing-g900aoc4-5-0-t3080437

If you don't mind posting in the above thread with a link to the ROM thread and steps on how you installed that way it can be morely confirmed and put into the list.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] skyrocketeer:
Dude that's awesome. It would be great if you could post the steps so that other people can do it too

Thanked you bro!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
this is what i did.......

step 1......use nce flasher apk.......this takes you straight to safestrap.....

stwp 2... wipe everything but sd card on stock slot.......then install your rom....

step 3...... reboot into download mode and put the lollipop kernal back with odin......

step 4..... thats it......so far ive done alliance from verizon.....twisted from t mobile and still going........

just a tip....it takes a long time to boot so be patient.........
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] skyrocketeer:
How did you put the kernel back in with Odin?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
put the OC4_stock kernal in ap slot in odin
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] K-alz:
Just use Muniz_ri method then install the NCE flasher apk. Then it'll take you to SS, flash your new ROM or mods or whatever then just flash the OC4 kernel and you're back in the game.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3087450

From my Allianced S5!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] dorqus:
Couldn't you just unzip the Twisted Lollipop ROM .zip file and replace the boot.img that they have with the stock OC4 one, re-zip it up and flash via FF?

Seems a lot simpler...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] pyro43284:
That's what I did [MENTION=2911026]dorqus[/MENTION] and flashed the kernel zip to be safe but after a couple fails found out it will not work unless your lollipop already had to Odin back twice lol but its running good so far 1st boot super long phone got to got for me rebooted and it updated 26 apps and started up fine
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] FilthyFord:
So just to be sure, all i need to do is replace the boot.img to the oc4 one and rezip and i should be able to flash it. I'm on 5.0 using muniz method. I'm running alliance 7.1 right now but have been wanting Twi5ted for a while now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] pyro43284:
Yep if you want to be safe chase it with the kernel zip too but kernel sway should be sufficient... I'll do a test real quick with mine with just the swapped kernel no extra zip I'll be back with results for ya shortly
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] K-alz:
A lot simpler than just two flashes? First one when you open the app and it flashes the NCE for you and takes you to safestrap. And the second one is when you're done flashing whatever you want just flash the OC4 kernel and boot back up to your phone.

I've tried FF and it was more complicated for me. Also, not everyone knows how to replace the boot.img like you did. I guarantee you that a lot of don't even know what it is. LOL
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] FilthyFord:
Easy now. Lol. I'm still learning myself. I just extracted the OA1 boot loader that muniz uploaded for the "5.0 update and keep root" copied all that was in that folder and placed in the Twi5ted folder and removed the Twi5ted "boit.img" is that not what should be done? I haven't flashed yet.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] pyro43284:
yea jus boot img swap is good just re flashed mine from full wipe and worked perfectly, i was also unable to get nce to work without safestrap recovery installed this seems to be the easiest way for me atleast lol:cowboy:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
running alliance rom.......
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
Downloaded twi5ted v4, unzipped it and extracted the boot.img from the G900A_OC4_Stock_Rooted_Firmware.tar.md5 in the g900a update to 5.0 thread, and deleted the one in the rom zip and replaced it, and rezipped. Upon trying to load it into flashfire I got a crash as someone as the verification got to 100, I tried 4 times, all of them with the same java.lang.outofmemory error, which was confusing cause I have plenty of memory free. I'm giving it another shot, if it works I'll come back here and give a link to the zip for anyone else who wants to do it with some steps that worked for me.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] FilthyFord:
That would be great.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
I'm back after attempt number 5, still no dice, it gets to 100% crashes, I'll go ahead and post the zip anyway in case anyone else wants to give it a shot. The exact process I did, was download the v4 zip from here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3037766 then extract it with zarchiver, replaced the boot.img, then zipped it again with zarchiver, and the file size went from 1.25 gb to 1.26 gb. It seems strange this one fails to load but the stock lollipop tar which is double this one's size loads much faster and perfectly fine. If you want to give it a go, download the zip, reboot your phone (to clear out as much memory as possible) and then open flash fire and add the zip as a firmware package, as it won't even show up if you click "flash zip or ota", for me at least. As usual, I'm not responsible if you brick, and can't provide any assurance you won't since I haven't even been able to flash it in the first place.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] skyrocketeer:
where did you get the KitKat Kernel tar from to flash with Odin? Odin only accepts .tar files and the only KitKat kernel i've found was from [MENTION=5300329]K-alz[/MENTION] and that's a flashable zip.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
When you use nice apk it automatically takes your kernel back down to kitkat...so I assume...after your in as and install your ROM..you use oc4 kernel through Odin...am I getting your question right?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] killatoyota4569:
OK so everytime u turn wifi off it reboots the phone? Wat about the network now?

I wonder if I should just stay on v4.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
No, when its doing the rebooting you can turn it off, after that you can turn it on and off all you want hut you need to turn it off before you reboot again. Unless you want to debug with me id say stay on v4.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] killatoyota4569:
Gotcha ok. Hmm I wanna figure this bs out for sure. This is by far best rom ever.

How come ur sig says 900a and mine says 900v
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
Tapatalk checks somewhere for device name, and the international fix zip puts 900v so it thinks its a 900v, i edited my sig to say g900a though as to not mislead anyone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] killatoyota4569:
Awesome thanks again buddy. Yeah love this rom tho
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] samccfl99:
now i get it all. no problem to use your procedure, but the link to the OC4 tar https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=95916177934553946 gets a 404 error. is this the G900A_OC4_Stock_Kernel.tar.md5? i got that a while ago. if it is, did not know that could be used in FF. seems everyone thinks the rom is great and fast. have to try it. should go to V4 first and get it working for a while and then try V5? also should i uninstall SS recovery and SS before i go to stock 5.0?

Thanks for all the help and patience.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] yodasoda:
i just flashed AllianceROM 8.1 from verizon everything running smooth
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
That would be the one yes, i can upload the file if its needed. You shouldnt have to uninstall safestrap. I would stay om v4 for now if you plan on using your phone normally.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
both ways with ss and ff works even if you got to start all over v4 or v5 can be flashed by there selfs......ive used the patch file everytime so i dont know about v5 if it needs it or not....i just like it it seems to make my phone run faster.......but this is just to verify that both ways do work and they can both be flashed by there self....the same way that works for v4................i didnt have any prob with wifi...this could be cause i used the patch file i dont know.....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] unk2009:
I've been following the thread, thank you for all the time put in...

I too would like to give Twisted V4 a go but I get the 404 error as well... I would greatly appreciate if you could upload the OC4 Stock Kernel file

Thanks again for your help
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] joseste4:
Thank you so much I was able to finally load v4 with no issues.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
The patch probably did it, i didnt patch when i flashed v5 and thats when the problems started, i never looked too farr in to it on v4 before i tried the patch but i'd bet its the wifi there too. I think its a wpa_supplicant issue, i was reading through the logcat and saw a lot of that yelling about stuff.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
here is a working flashible oc4 kernal for anyone that needs it........ http://xdaforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3277148&stc=1&d=1429760751
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
mines working good and is blazing fast....the only issue is the root,but it really aint caused me any prob. yet i just aint used to seeing grant root priv......lol.......
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
i do know when i set up my apn i go to APN and put default,supl,mms and that seems to fix all data issues......
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] joseste4:
May still be too early to mention this but battery life seems sub par. After a full charge the best I've seen from the battery status would be about 7 hours.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] samccfl99:
Wait. You are confusing me. :confused: Using the FF method, is it G900A_OC4_Stock_KERNEL_Recovery-Flashable.zip OR G900A_OC4_Stock_Kernel.tar.md5? i posted and asked Rakuu and he told me the tar file. maybe he misunderstood which method i am going to use. i know that is an Odin file. so which is it??? going to do this tomorrow night. got things to do tomorrow, need my phone! Thanks.

What's this post about bad battery, may I ask? have not seen that in this thread yet. this is supposed to be for G900A, not V. crazy cell phones and the manufacturers and providers!!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
that is a working flashible oc4 kernal.............. ff or ss
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] mircony:
So v5 has the WiFi reboot issue correct?

Is v4 OK? I had version 5 working and then it started rebooting and I didn't know.....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
Flashible kernel seems to have spotty success, heres the actual tar for anyone who the zip doesnt work for https://mega.co.nz/#!DFwwSY6B!3gZdIayECjy-wuJTGQDDBTRrnYY-xX77W6C-ccxntvY
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Harsha Panchumarthy:
G900T roms for G900A

Can we install lollipop T-Mobile rom on Galaxy S5 AT&T .... Or give me links of some compaible lollipop rom for G900A(AT&T) pls..... thanks in advance
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] joseste4:
Did anyone find the hidden game behind the lollipop easter egg lmao. It's had me playing for a while. My high score was 6.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
Did you read the thread, like at all?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] ryan0720:
Wtf........flappy droid.......

Man.....cant get past 4...

SICK G900A.......
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] joseste4:
YES!!! Lmfaoooo. I've been stuck at 6.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] samccfl99:
Sorry, last time. I opened FF to check. so the tar file can be used in FF? It does show up. Thanks again.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
Yep, just tap flash firmware package.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] joseste4:
One bug I haven't been able to work around is the messages app force closing if I leave the conversation and keep a draft saved in it. I have to delete the entire convo and start new.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
Thats fixed in v5 if you maybe want to try dowbloading v5 and extracting the messaging from that and replacing the v4 one.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] rs3freak:
could i flash v5 with the same method(page 3) if i was never on v4? im on L through muniz_ri process...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] killatoyota4569:
Id stay on V4, V5 has some issues with G900A phone, Rakku and I are working on it
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 5] Rakuu:
Just for documentation purposes or whatever, yes i believe you could, and i believe the issue on v4 is the same as the one on v5, so if we can fix it here we can fix it on v4 and the international fix isn't needed.