yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 5 Android Development] swirly05:
1) Yes

2) Yes
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Tex99:
It s not true, the option 1 (volume media control), unfortunately it s not present :)
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
It's in settings chroma volume rocker. It doesn't get more simple then that. Ambient display needs to be off
[Nexus 5 Android Development] rfkw:
Thanks for the reply. This will allow me to adjust media volume with volume rocker even when no media is playing right?

Stock from Google will adjust the ring volume instead.

I believe cursor control using volume rocker is available when the keyboard is up. Does it have any Navigation Bar modifications like this?

Thanks!
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Tex99:
These are the options in volume rocker :) (ambient off)

Spoiler content hidden.

The media volume control there isn't. Maybe you mean a different function, I mean that in every moment that I press volume rocker, I change the media volume and not the ring volume (I find it very helpful because I never change ring volume but only media volume, and sometimes with volume rocker wake I change for error the ring volume)

(I take this opportunity to thank you for this great rom)
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
1. No it will adjust ringer, if u have media playing it'll adjust media.

2. No the arrows appear on far left and far right. You did something to your phone.

Oh you mean change media key, that's not a feature in the ROM. I actually wanted to include it with 04/25 but the feature wasn't working so it never made it to the final 04/25 build.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] rfkw:
Yup I'm on a custom rom already. I'm just wondering on some of the minor things that I use on a daily basis. Looking forward for some new roms to try on.

And yea, looks like [MENTION=4845088]Tex99[/MENTION] and I were talking about the same thing. Hopefully the option to enable media volume control anytime in the next update? :D
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
If I have the time and can get it working, then sure.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Renton91:
I know I asked already, but might the increasing ringtone be a useful feature? Sorry if I asked again, but it's a feature I miss sincerely, I hate when phone starts ringing loudly, but if volume is too low than it can happens you don't even listen. Don't you think?
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Vanilla Pudding:
It would be great if you added the Control media directly instead of ringtone thing .
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Renton91:
But if you need to control media volume, can't you simply expand volume menu and regulate it?
[Nexus 5 Android Development] peikojose:
I am really happy with this ROM! Excellent work.

Is there a setting like long press back key to kill app? This has helped me before with buggy apps
[Nexus 5 Android Development] AquilaDroid:
Look in Chroma Options (in settings).
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
I'm going to repeat myself again,

In other words, do not make a feature request. The Nexus 6 thread is nothing but user requests and I get annoyed. That thread is under heavy moderation because of it. Respect my decision or use another ROM that may have the feature you're looking for, Chroma isn't for everybody. Chroma is lightweight and is intended not to have every single feature you'd see in other custom ROMs. Chroma is my ROM and if I didn't include something it's because it's not useful (subjective) or I haven't had the time
[Nexus 5 Android Development] marf28101995:
Tomorrow you'll have to say it again... XDA nowadays mate ;)
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
If that's the case then I'll have the moderators who are moderating my N6 thread to moderate this thread too.

This weekend has been nothing but stress because of people wanting to change Chroma to what it is currently to what the user expects Chroma to be. Chroma is lightweight and is not expected to contain every single feature.

It is a ROM suited to my needs, it is my ROM and my "vision" on what a custom ROM should have. You as a user, just enjoy the ride and enjoy what the developer gives you to without the user providing anything.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] marf28101995:
I'm 100% with you in that !

Keep pushing it :)
[Nexus 5 Android Development] theesotericone:
Well said. A better option for now might be to just lock the thread. It works way better than having the mods babysit it. Open it to post updates then relock. Users tend to get that way faster. Let's face it not everyone actually reads a post back much less a page or two.

You and [MENTION=1050103]sykopompos[/MENTION] have put out a solid fast ROM. I'm actually going to start using it as a base for my personal builds. I'll cherry-pick a few things that I'd like to see in my vision of the ROM. What I won't do though is ask you too do anything more than you've already done. So thanks man.:cool:
[Nexus 5 Android Development] SacredDeviL666:
i completely agree to [MENTION=1978554]zephiK[/MENTION] decision of keeping it moderated if people aren't going to listen to him when he says not to make requests for mods/features.....

however its not because it is XDA these days as [MENTION=4939514]marf28101995[/MENTION] its always been this way and thats how the need for something arises and eventually the one who requests gets a way to find the feature with a different rom or else a new developer arises with including those features.... apart from considering this as requests these also gives ideas for new modifications and make your rom unique.... well from the times of any coding thats how it evolves... one mans request becomes someone's idea or goes to bin... so it should be that way always the requests needs to happen :)

as the mods repeat over and over the roms are made for themselves but if it was for themselves only why was it shared? its because he/she wanted to share his achievement with the rest crowd or take opinions in improving or many more ideas behind it... no developer posts a rom without a reason and no rom will last without the users supporting it with feedbacks, requests, mods xyz else it becomes redundant and then the developer would walk away from his own project as its not accepted anymore or with boredom of not doing anything new....so its a thin line when the developers makes statements its made for 'ME' and i am sharing it FOR FUN and nothing thats the beginning of the end :) whether you all want to agree or not....eventually a lot close the thread here to prove that point but then end up in g+ so it goes back to the point developers needs users for his/her development to improve :) thats how its always been and it would be from the days of Khaled... mirc... irc and many more such free developments available or even Linux in the first place... i should stop the rambling loll :p
[Nexus 5 Android Development] californicated:
The lastest release feels pretty perfect, especially in combination with code blue r938 :fingers-crossed:

Feature request for no more feature requests :p
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Won't be druv:
This rom is far and away the best custom rom I've used on any of my phones and tablets. Some people just want every feature under the sun, in that case why not install a rom with xposed? This rom rocks, thanks dev you are a star!
[Nexus 5 Android Development] crazyeats:
Sprint data was working before with the APN file. I also don't have an APN section in settings. The problem sprint users are having is improper profile/prl management.

Settings > More > APN does not exist.

Settings > More > Cellular networks > Carrier settings forces closes.

This has been happening since lollipop release on most custom ROM's.

But I do have working data. View attachment 3283384View attachment 3283385

Also this ROM is solid and me favorite! Don't give into these request monsters! Haha
[Nexus 5 Android Development] tcat007:
Bug? Anyone know why some fonts don't play nice with some roms? I use Fonster, Aller light font. I was on Purity and changed to Chroma, both latest 5.1. This is a shot from my n7 (but no colon on my n5 either). Had a colon with Purity.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Gallardo994:
I'm pretty sure that neither of roms officially support third party font changers. It's just a panacea.

Sent via Fapatalk on my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
No, I don't want the thread locked. If the moderators wish to moderate the thread then they may, its what they're here for.

And I don't allow people to build Chroma, so if you do somehow manage to build it... don't share it with others.

Ahh, I can add APN for Sprint users. It's like that for the Nexus 6, the APN list won't appear unless I specify it to appear for Sprint users.

Carrier settings force close because SprintDM isn't included with the ROM and/or proprietary Sprint stuff is missing.

I have no idea why someone reported an issue with Sprint until they flashed the other apn list then.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] crazyeats:
I been putting the APN file in manually to get data since I made the jump from liquidsmooth. Love this ROM and data works great. A fix would be great but I'm in no rush. Everything else work amazing.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
I already provided a fix, people confirmed it to work. I'll have it defaulted in the next build,

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3jxpapkm2rus6kg/apns-conf.xml?dl=0 is the new APN list. It'll be added next build.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] maximo86:
Hello i install chroma but ambient display dosnt work, I have turned on the screen adjustments- - Ambient screen. any solutions??
[Nexus 5 Android Development] yyz71:
I love this ROM one question.. 2015-04-21.zip I love that theme you removed it from the update 2015-04-25.zip what is the name of it I can search for it :good:
[Nexus 5 Android Development] vsot13:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bitsykolayers.TimberWolfFree

Sent from my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
Timberwolf. You can find it on the Play Store, if you really like it you can purchase the paid version.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] theesotericone:
You might wanna take down your GIthub page then. I didn't realize you where opposed to people using it as a base. Usually people who use public repositories are OK with others using that work as long as credit is given. The whole not allowing thing is your choice and I'll respect it. I just won't use it.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] yyz71:
Perfect Thanks man :good:
[Nexus 5 Android Development] eko_cahyono:
I have a lot of battery drain, lost 1% every 30s... Does anyone have the sama issue?
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Sage:
I agree.. not sharing is against the spirit of open source android.. anything and everything should be shared.. just as long as you give props to creator.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Gallardo994:
Not only you should give credits, but you should originally ask the author(s) for the permission. That's what the common sense and XDA-Developers rules require.

Sent via Fapatalk on my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Sage:
Sorry you are correct. Permission should definitely be sought.. just strange to see when it is denied is all..
[Nexus 5 Android Development] AndreIrawan97:
Well, yeah, me too...

I think it's because battery problem
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
Use GSam to debug your battery life. I'd recommend BetterBatteryStats but it seems to be having problems installing as a /system/app/ and force closes.

I have no reason to take down my Github page. Everything is open-sourced, a ROM is a ROM and a ROM isn't a kernel. I'm not required to share sources with my ROM but I show it for frameworks, settings as well as device specific commits for other ROMs to look at so we can compare.

I just personally wouldn't want anyone compiling Chroma or bringing it to other devices without properly testing it and then giving the name Chroma. I'm open to having people port it to other devices but I'd need to have a look at that person's past ported ROMs as well as their response to users.

I spent a lot of time building Chroma from the bottom up with no experience with ROM building. The process of learning is far more superior than just basing your ROM off another ROM and then building on top of theirs. Chances are, you'd be merging your sources with my up to date one.. not to mention, I don't like it if someone was to compile Chroma with experimental features that are to be included in the next build and then release Chroma with the "upcoming" features before I actually push my update.

I may change this in the future and whatnot, but for now... that's my stance.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] ballmead:
I had issues with cLock smoking my battery as it kept the phone awake overnight while I slept.

I don't really use it so I froze it in TB.

Sent from my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 Android Development] eko_cahyono:
Gmail app, ate my battery above 20%
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
If you have weather enabled in cLock, set manual location and change the refresh interval to 6 hours instead of 60mins.

It could be possible that your Gmail was stuck syncing and kept eating the battery. Try clearing app cache and data then it should be fixed.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] theesotericone:
Fair enough. Like I've already said I respect what you've stated and won't use it. I have no interest in ROMs that have any closed source. It's why I've never used any of them. As far as my personal builds go, they are just that, personal. I don't release any of them. Mostly for the reason of not wanting to have to deal with people requesting or complaining. Something that you seem to be familiar with. If my initial post came across the wrong way I apologize. I would never consider taking someones work and releasing it without there consent. Best of luck with getting your ROM where you want it to be and hopefully I've cleared up any confusion my post may have caused.:cool:
[Nexus 5 Android Development] eko_cahyono:
Thank you [MENTION=1978554]zephiK[/MENTION] for your fast response, will try it and report back
[Nexus 5 Android Development] piperx:
I agree with the closed source stuff, as I build LFS (Linux from scratch, based on Debian sid) and my own custom version of siduction (Debian sid) and a few builds of liquid smooth before it died out, I too don't/won't share those builds without permission.

Sent from my Nexus 5 xda-dev app
[Nexus 5 Android Development] SacredDeviL666:
and all this 'MINE' is based on an open source i believe.... and you don't want anyone to keep the name Chroma is perfectly logical... but if someone wants to do experimental features and not call it chroma does it still bother? does Google bothered when you messed around in the beginning as you said you started from scratch by learning? did AOSP seek the copies of your previous builds or roms or developments before letting you to mod and tweak with their codings which is a contribution of thousands already?

seeking permission is fine... but to go through his previous builds to certify the developer is eligible to use source code?

Man we all are starting to sound like CM!!!!!!

Please please i am not picking up an argument nor would i want anyone to support this statement of mine... but it just seems naive when you say you don't want others to use the source(with permission ofcourse. approval by checking of previous builds of the developer?) once which you had used and experimented with on someone Else's long given time and effort....

keep it close then probably....

you going to be back anytime soon [MENTION=1050103]sykopompos[/MENTION] man missing you and you being around this thread mostly....
[Nexus 5 Android Development] caboocho:
I'm sorry to butt in, I'm no programmer, but aren't people at Google paid to work on android and develop AOSP so that other folks can take it where they want? It's a little different from somebody working by himself or herself on his or her free time for no pay. Sorry, that's just my respectful outsider's perspective.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] SacredDeviL666:
i lost you there sorry... i think you just picked few lines and made it to something different... please go through the whole thing... and lets not turn this into an argument or discussion or topic ....that was purely for [MENTION=1978554]zephiK[/MENTION]
[Nexus 5 Android Development] silberj:
With regards to sprint, aosp has always even iffy. This rom is great except I can't use it due to the sprint cell service issue. Stock roms work fine :(
[Nexus 5 Android Development] midgarsormr:
I'm just glad we have this for the Nexus 5.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Terminus rom+Code Blue kernel.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] caboocho:
I meant no offense my friend. I was just trying to support [MENTION=1978554]zephiK[/MENTION]'s philosophy by pointing out that people at Google *want* other folks to use their android code, and their hard labor is actually what they are paid (a lot) to do. So a single dev's position about sharing his or her ROM is different from Google's. I'll leave it at that. Sorry for the off topic.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] SacredDeviL666:
Sorry, you are limited to 8 thanks per day :(

so i have to say that here thanks buddy :)
[Nexus 5 Android Development] crazyeats:
I'm on sprint and this me daily ROM. No network drops or any other data problems with proper APN file. Carrier settings force closes but stay tuned. Will b working soon enough.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] ballmead:
Thanks, I'll give it a try.

This was a weird one though, it literally kept the phone awake for 8 hrs while I slept (according to BBS)

Sent from my Nexus 5
[Nexus 5 Android Development] ironclad1911:
i was not able to flash xposed installers new zip it says sdk version 22 and expected version is 21......is this due to upgrade to 5.1.1?
[Nexus 5 Android Development] AndreIrawan97:
As far as i know, there is no Xposed for 5.1 nor 5.1.1... I think it's for 5.0 only
[Nexus 5 Android Development] ironclad1911:
ohh yes i am sorry my bad....... this new zip has bug fixes its still for 5.0............thanks!
[Nexus 5 Android Development] AndreIrawan97:
It's okay mate ! :D
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
Chroma isn't closed source, all of the source code is provided. The only thing not provided is the manifest which is a file that lets users sync all of the repositories needed to have the build environment set up for Chroma.

The only reason why I do this is because Chroma is important to me and I wouldn't want to see anyone build an unofficial version and then call their ROM Chroma (or rename Chroma to something else) to include features that I wouldn't necessarily approve of or build a version of Chroma that is not tested properly on lets say... a Samsung Galaxy, LG G2/3, OnePlus One device and then have problems with device specific features.

To me, if a person is to build a unofficial version of Chroma then they best better share the same vision and philosophy as myself. If that makes any sense. Stability and performance is important to me, and I'm sure it's just as important to you guys too.

It actually does matter, if someone was to build Chroma and then remove all of the "Chroma" labeling in About Chroma and only do a couple changes then that's pretty rude. I've seen ROMs and kernels where people fork a person or group's ROM and kernel and do only a couple changes and then name their ROM or Kernel to totally something else. To me that doesn't make any sense because that person didn't really contribute much to justify naming that ROM or kernel to something else.

As I've already repeated myself, the source code is available on Github and will be available. The only thing not available is the manifest.

I've spent a lot of time and effort into Chroma. People on the N4 and N5 seem to love ROMs such as Purity and Cataclysm and from what I remember they either

A) Don't share sources (repositories)

B) Don't share manifest

C) or both

Chroma shares the repositories as well as give credit to the rightful creators of the code. I have my own right to authorize people to compile my ROM or not as well as use the ROM name "Chroma." Chroma is a ROM that is a vision of how Android should be in my opinion, the core philosophy is important to me and will always be important.

Don't look at me as if I'm the evil person because I'm not. Every company does it too, they have their own proprietary closed source applications including Google. My sources are available, I just don't share my manifest because I don't want people compiling my ROM without following the core philosophy of the ROM and I don't find it right that a person would compile my ROM and do a couple changes and then renames my ROM to something else.

I'm done talking about this topic and I will have a moderator clean this thread if this is escalated because honestly, I'm really tired of having to repeat myself when I don't need to. TonyStark (in N6 Chroma thread) says "my house and my rules." Chroma is my quality work and if anyone was to compile it, I want to be sure that the compiled build that particular user doing is "quality" as well.

Xposed is not officially supported on 5.1.x by the Xposed developer. There is a unofficial ported version but it's unofficial for a reason.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Jax Teller:
Do you think it would be possible for Chroma to be ported to OnePlus One?
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
It's possible but I honestly don't feel like messing around with CyanogenMod and CAF related stuff. I do this as a hobby and for free, I have a life outside of XDA as well you know ;)

Plus I'm a one person team (as Syko took a step back), I don't want to allocate my time to other devices other than the ones I'm already caring for (N4/N5/N6).

And no, I don't want a team either. Teams cause problems and conflicts on the decision making when it comes to what direction they want to take with the ROM. I'm willing to accept help with translations and all, but nothing too serious.

Edit: And besides.... the more devices supported, the less "special" attention you'll get on your device. I'm sure you wouldn't want your developer to be spending most of his time on another forum, even though I spend most of the time on the N6 forums. I try my best to go through the rest of the threads but it's very time consuming.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Jax Teller:
I really understand your point of you and you are right.

Chroma is already on a lot devices and you would need not only a team for development but a team for support also.:)
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
Yep, I have a lot on my plate as it is already so its probably best not to add more to my plate :p

Btw, Dexter is a great show. So sad that it ended :( it was one of the shows I looked forward to the most on a Sunday night.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Jax Teller:
Yeah, Dexter was so good, my all time favourite:D

I've seen many other shows that I liked also after that but since a lot of people recognize me from my avatar, I keep it.:p
[Nexus 5 Android Development] zephiK:
As long as you don't come after me, Michael Hall ;)
[Nexus 5 Android Development] lamjanus:
Flashed this ROM coming from stock. Did it as described in OP. Getting play services errors

and not able to open Chroma settings for eg. Ota or changelog check. What can be wrong?
[Nexus 5 Android Development] Ultraschorsch:
Well, if you did anything like in the description in OP, my best guess would be a corrupted download. Maybe re-download and re-flash? Chroma is running flawless here.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] lamjanus:
OK, will try that!
[Nexus 5 Android Development] jyesucevitz:
2 problems i need help with

just flashed this rom coming from slim. clean flash. everything seemed to work. problem 1. power menu does not show reboot options. problem 2. the signal bar has an exclamation point next to it and when i try to go online it tells my im offline. any ideas? thanks in advance.
[Nexus 5 Android Development] rpmfc36:
1) programmer options - > advanced reboot

2) means no data or no connection to Google servers