yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Arthur King:
For those having the issue about the cpu stuck at 1.5 Ghz just go to the app, then to the cpu and change the min frequency to something else, then put it back on 300 MHz and it will start going down to 300 MHz as usual.

BTW, this about the frequency things it's a common problem of CM, I had a Moto G and it had the same issue, but as I can see, even when it got stuck at that frequency there is no "battery drain", or not for me.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] 2phazt:
This only works a few seconds and then it ramps up to 1500 mhz again.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Arthur King:
That's weird... For me it stays going down to 300 MHz again
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Keeping 2 CPU cores on is normal after last merge of Android MM kernel sources.

And as for the rest, my CPU stays on 300 MHz when there is no load.

Dunno why not for you guys...

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] j1gga84:
I would not say that 300MHz is generally not used but very often the CPU stucks at 1574 MHz when screen is on and I don't do anything.. (screenshot 6)

Please see attached screenshots, I don't know if it has something to do with my settings :confused:

In screenshot 1 and 2 you can see my settings.

In screenshot 1 I set the minimum CPU to 300MHz but what does that blue line on minimum CPU means? the right end of that line is excactly 1574 MHz !

When I set the min frequency to any other freq than 300 MHz and go back to 300 that blue line disappears (screenshot 3) but when I quit the configurator and enter it again that blue line is back.

When I set the min freq to 422 MHz, exit the configurator and re-enter it there is no more blue line.. But that makes no difference, the min freq. still stucks at 1574 MHz most of the time, only very rarely it scales down to 300 MHz, the steps between 300 and 1574MHz are used only very rarely also (screenshot 5) :confused:

For GPU it is similar but here the min freq. is reached most of the time (Screenshot 4 and 5)

Is there anything I can do to "get 300 MHz back to work?"

As you can see I am not alone with this issue..

Since the boeffla kernel uses the anykernel method I guess a complete uninstall and re-install would not help.. !?

regards
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] 2phazt:
After an activity is started the cpu1 is stuck at 2.8ghz or 1.5ghz. Only after the page is scrolled for example the frequency goes down to a normal value (300mhz).

My problem is my homescreen isn't scrollable so it's mostly stuck on 1.5ghz.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Don't know what you could do. Stock kernel shows the same behaviour.

And I have not changed cpu scaling in any way, so the behavious is similar.

Ok, I would know a solution, but this is not what people like to hear: Buy a proper phone :)

But no, I am not aware of a solution myself at all.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Arthur King:
I think people dont have to care that much about it, unless it results on battery drain, but on my tests, even if the cpu stuck at 1.5 ghz i dont get any battery drain, and i saw the kind of "lags" when the cpu goes down to 300 mhz so im thinking that its just it gets readed wrong and it says that is at 1.5 ghz when its not.

So, to say it faster, in my use even if the cpu stays a 1500 i dont have the battery drain that its supose to happen when its really stucked at that speed
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] 2phazt:
And I think something is slightly broken anywhere and it would be beneficial if it was fixed. At least it's not so urgent that I would roll back to an older version.

Maybe it's touchboost related because when it's disabled the frequency is stuck whatever I do.

When I enable touchboost the frequency is stuck when the activity starts but after touch its released and goes down to 300.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Arthur King:
As i said again, if its broken, im not having any issue, only that it says the core stuck at that freq, but since im not getting any problem like reboots, or the most expected, battery drain, i think its not that bad(AGAIN, for me).

And Andi just said it, he dont have any solution so... Yeah.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Danhack000:
I need your help and expertise suggestions!!

Hello guys, I'm new to the forum and I'm here cuz I'm seeking for your help and suggestions. I'm running nemesis rom with phoenix kernel and im trying to flash boeffla kernel over it but I'm achieving no success. Can you guys gimme suggestions on how to? I love boeffla kernel cuz of the overclock option, other kernels lack of it. Thanks for the help.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] j1gga84:
Might have to do something with fingerprint:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=69282868

The strange thing is that battery life seems to be better with CM stock kernel..

Regards

Gesendet von meinem SM-G900F mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
New kernel version for CM13 is out.

Version 3.3-beta5

25.10.2016

- Note: This kernel is only for CM based roms which are newer or of 07.10.2016, for older rom take latest stable version !!

[*]If you use custom roms like Resurrection Remix, Blisspop etc. you have to carefully check if you need still version 3.2 stable as custom roms are usually updated with slower pace

- Update: Updated with latest official CM kernel commits as of 25.10.16, 8am CET

(this includes upstreaming of Linux version to 3.4.12)

- New: Remove verifiedbootstage flag to avoid triggering safetynet (this means improved compatibility to certain apps like Android Pay etc.)

Enjoy

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] spaziomilano:
Hi all, need your help, just make the last update from this Kernel on my S5 with A.i.c.p updated 09/10/16, do you have some help for good setting for my phone?

thanks
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] The~Skater~187:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION], I would like to kindly ask your permission to use your kernel source for an experimental kernel I'd like to try to make. Your source seems very straight forward and I believe it would be a good place for a novice like me to start. With your blessing that is.

Resurrection-Remix-BoefflaKernel-SM-G900P
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Sure. Go ahead.

Just if you want to publish it one day, think of credits and link to thread please.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] The~Skater~187:
I probably won't end up with anything with posting, by will definitely keep you in mind. Thank you for your blessing.

Resurrection-Remix-BoefflaKernel-SM-G900P
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] spaziomilano:
Nothing? no one?
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
There is a dedicated thread for configuration questions.

But not in combination with your rom. So you might be on your own.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] spaziomilano:
Tks...

Envoyé de mon SM-G900W8 en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] spaziomilano:
Hi need to know,the Zram do what is good or not to disable?
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Depends. When you need lots of multitasking because you have many apps open in parallel, then it might help a bit.

I usually switch off zram always, I close every app after using it. So I never need zram.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] spaziomilano:
Thanks

Envoyé de mon SM-G900W8 en utilisant Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] fbs:
right after booting, when boeffla config is loaded, the headset sound gets louder, even though "boeffla sound" is not enabled in it.

why??
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] 2phazt:
Viper or similar installed?
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
I doubt, because Boeffla-Sound does zero when it is not enabled. Then all code hooks are inactive.

Whatever it is on your side, either you find it or you have to live with it.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] afr33sl4ve:
Question; does 3.3b5 work with 20161028? I'm trying it out myself in a few minutes, so I'll let you know. It's just that they had some kernel updates in 27 looks like.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] jjkrause1:
So far, so good. For me it seems to be running even better than on the previous nightly.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
No kernel changes in core kernel code.

So it will run of course.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] afr33sl4ve:
Thanks!
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] j1gga84:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]

Me and some other users were talking about CPU not going below 1574 MHz. This only happens after the CM kernel commits were added. I can only speak for me but I flashed my ROM dirty. Could it be necessary to flash the ROM on a clean system with the new MM based kernel?

Regards

Gesendet von meinem SM-G900F mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
I don't think so. But you can try it.

I think it is a side effect of the new mm kernel sources...

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] LGaljo:
I want to report a bug here, two days ago I dirty flashed newer CM nightly atop CM nightly and then boeffla kernel and camera stopped working, then I did clean flash and same thing (28th CM version and 3.2 stable Boeffla kernel). I got camera working by flashing CM kernel. Before that I was using 21102016 nightly and 3.1 kernel w/o issues. If you need logs, I can make them.

BTW before that happened, kernel was incredible :D
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
I have to reject the bug report, sorry.

I am on latest official CM nightly with latest beta kernel and all runs fine.

But you should NOT use stable kernel version, the change log clearly says you need the latest beta kernel for latest CM versions. Stable version is too old for current camera blobs.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] ScratMan38:
I installed the October 30th nightly, and now BC app seems to be not working anymore.

The boot configuration is very long to be applied, and when launching manually the app it becomes unresponsive.

In Cyandelta, there are many changes mentioned in the changelog that looks like kernel related (sdcardfs, vfs, etc...).
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Yup. Once again they broke things.

I think I should stop S5 development asap, as this is a constant source of errors at the moment.

Will update the kernel first, then it could work again. Fingers crossed.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Just for info: Not kernel related. The same happens with stock kernel.

It seems, nightly of 30/10 is completely defect. 28th runs fine.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Hi all,

small maintenance update for the CM13 kernel:

Version 3.3-beta6

31.10.2016

- Note: This kernel is only for CM based roms which are newer or of 07.10.2016, for older rom take latest stable version !!

If you use custom roms like Resurrection Remix, Blisspop etc. you have to carefully check if you need still version 3.2 stable as custom roms are usually updated with slower pace

- Update: Updated with latest official CM kernel commits as of 31.10.16, 8am CET

- Change: Build script improvements (credits to ZaneZam)

Enjoy

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] rommy667:
With beta 6 (s5) the config app cant get root for some reason latest su installed and root enabled in cm 13.Thanks for the quick update either way :) humm actually it might be the su app its self as its black screening on me......
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] jjkrause1:
I had to give mine a few extra seconds for the SU dialog box to pop up so I could grant it access, but it works fine after that.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] rommy667:
Really jjkrause1, for me it just stays on black screen latest su never had probs before so im just gona reinstall cm 13 from the 28th again for now :)
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] jjkrause1:
For what it's worth, I'm still using the CM build from the 28th.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] rommy667:
ah i see well if u try the 30th build it will black screen...........
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] HotRod11686:
Is there any way to re-enable the hardware keys to be used when the screen is on? I do not see a setting anywhere on the app and I cant get them to re-enable.

Thanks!
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
This has nothing to do with kernel or app.

Root is borked in 28/10 build, as I wrote yesterday:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=69391796&postcount=2958

Latest nightly as of 01/11 is fine again, I just flashed it.

Hardware keys are not controlled by my app or kernel. So when you switched them off somewhere, you need to switch them on again at the same place.

In rom settings, there should be the option you are searching for somewhere.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] STk3000:
Have a good trip Andi, take it easy ;)
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] james_rokr:
Dude, camera isn't working with freshly installed CM13 (October 13 snapshop build), camera worked before flashing boeffla 3.3 beta6 kernel.

I have no root, no xposed, no magisk, just CM13 and Gapps, camera starts working again after re flashing CM13.

I've tried with root, without it, and the problem persists

Also wiped caches and stuff and the problem its still there

Update, tried ALL THE 3.3 Betas from beta 1 to beta 6 and none of them could get the thrice damned camera to work, however stable version 3.2 brings camera to work :)
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] haggertk:
Snapshot is based on the old, pre-rebase kernel, so this is expected.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Triviox:
Someone can confirm if works? test it?

I will try boeffla-kernel-3.3-beta6-CM13.0-g900f-anykernel.recovery.zip in Galaxy S5 G900m over CM13 (night 01-11-16)

Thanks!
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] james_rokr:
Makes sense then
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Arthur King:
This kernel works fine on G900M. No single issue.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Pjerisimo:
Which of the included governors are the most battery optimized?
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Triviox:
I can confirm works great, not issues!.

What governor did you recommed to S5? I wanna play games with phone connect at power charging (or still not download at less). I try one or two options and battery still downloading when play games with phone conect at power.

Thanks!
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Arthur King:
Well, i think thats because of the charger. If you have the original charger you can try this. Go to Miscellaneous 1 and on the "AC charge current [mA] (0 = stock logic)" get the slider to 1600 or 1800. Btw it depends on what are you playing. I recommend the interactive governor if you want no single issue.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] afr33sl4ve:
Curious question, I flashed SuperSU 2.87 SR2 because I want suhide. Now, it's saying the kernel isn't enforcing?

What would that be?
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] STk3000:
Anyone else experiencing freezes for 5 seconds than reboot?

---------- Post added at 01:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:49 AM ----------

https://www.dropbox.com/s/gvp5de5j80anwqr/bc.log?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/a8faklu7r10shsv/bc.log.1?dl=0
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] jjkrause1:
I didn't want to pollute this thread with an issue that might be unique to me, but since someone else mentioned it I'll share my experience...

I've had this happen a few times when using the "Power" preset. In fact, it just happened yesterday. My phone stopped typing while I was replying to an email. I thought it was keyboard lag at first, and then realized the phone was completely locked up. None of the buttons did anything, including the power button. The phone rebooted about 10 seconds later. The first time I pressed the home button after the reboot, I was asked to choose my default launcher because all my default app settings were cleared. Other than that, everything seems to be untouched.

I've also experienced some issues while using the "Battery Saving" preset, where my Bluetooth didn't want to stay connected when playing music in the car. Because of that, I usually only use that preset when I'm mountain biking or when I know I won't be using the phone much.

The "Standard" preset seems rock-solid, so I tend to stick with that one.

My SM-G900P is currently running 20161101-NIGHTLY with 3.3-beta6, but this has happened on previous versions as well.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Power profile does overclock. Quite normal it doesn't work stable for everyone.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Where does it say this?

You should probably check if you still have Boeffla kernel installed or superstupid supersu replaced it by stock again.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] STk3000:
I'm not running the power profile, Andi.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
I'll wait for beta11... Hope [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] can fix it.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] The Peterle:
I also noticed some strange wake locks with beta 10 on BBS. Bam_dmux and msm_serial.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] dyval:
[MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] can definitely fix it. :)
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] ghoster76:
CM 12.1 was also unstable at all. The reason I stayed with stock T.W
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] dyval:
How do you define unstable? Even [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION] uses CM. :cowboy:
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Well, if in the end the upstream turns out to add more instability, I will definitely sacrifice it again.

I am anyways considering for ALL my S5 and OPO kernels to remove it.

It is lots of work and usually breaks more things than it helps.

But lets see how beta11 will perform.

I had none of the reported problems so far myself.

Hm, for me it was pretty stable. But I have to admit, I am not a heavy user of my S5 as I personally have a OPO as my daily driver.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] dyval:
That's what I thought [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION].. Perhaps the upstream isn't that good. Because Beta9 works well. :good:
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] HorstiG:
My S5 is flying like a Eagle. 150 Apps and 10 Xposed Modules, without any Problem.

Battery Live is in normal range.

HGT - S5 G900F - Oneplus One - Tesla TTL7

---------- Post added at 15:34 ---------- Previous post was at 15:29 ----------

And the other thing, CM12.1 is not a Stock Kernal, it's a CM Custom Kernel.

Stock Kernel for S5 is original Samsung Kernel. Test times this [emoji6]

HGT - S5 G900F - Oneplus One - Tesla TTL7
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
So is Cm12.1 stable and smooth on your OPO? :)
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
I have to say, yes.

Although I also have CM12.1 on my development OPO, my main OPO runs with CM12s (OnePlus CM Stock). Different again :)

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] ghoster76:
OPO runs CM12s like Samsung runs TW. Stock R is always stable than custom R. That I know and I think
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
New CM12.1 beta kernel

Hi all,

here we go, new kernel for you for CM12.1.

Version 2.0-beta11

Note: Only for CM nightlies of 14.05. or newer (and custom roms having these new changes in)

25.05.2015

BFQ scheduler updated to version BFQ-v7r7

Updated with latest official CM kernel commits as of 23.05.15

Ramdisk updated to first official CM12.1 nightly of 25.05.15

Enjoy

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] djdana:
Breaks more hahaha man my fone runs smooth[emoji2]

The wakelocks mentioned above are

bam_dmux_wakelock 4%

And the other one I can't find[emoji15] it

If u thinking of dropping a fone please not the s5
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Nope. I only meant I would consider dropping the upstream. Personally I am not a big fan of it. And due to that I always have another kernel branch in parallel without an upstream... So would be simple for me to remove it [emoji2]

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] dyval:
Thank you for the update [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]. So is there a version for beta 11 w/o the upstream? Thanks
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
No. I just can any time build it straight away. But have no intention for the moment, the upstream should just work fine. Test the new versions [emoji2]

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] djdana:
Pfffffff[emoji2] haha thought the best kernal ever stopped
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Hehe. Nooonoooo, I do not consider to add even more kernel variants to my overall portfolio.

Have too many already for my limited time.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] dyval:
Will flash and test. I'll report back [MENTION=947981]Lord Boeffla[/MENTION]. Thanks. :good:
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] HorstiG:
Thanks for the update. Runs good as ever.

Battery consumption has dropped tremendously, test time 5 minutes ;) :D
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] FlexiPack:
Sorry for the noob question, but in the OP it says to flash Stock Kernel before Boeffla. Does it mean the stock kernel that comes with CM13 or the stock kernel that comes with the Samsung TW rom?
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] finotti:
The one from CM13. If you flashed the ROM (and didn't mess with the kernel), you already have the kernel and so can proceed to flash the Boeffla kernel.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] FlexiPack:
Thanks,

I went ahead and did just that. I'm getting an error message 'Can't Connect to the Camera' :crying:
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] afr33sl4ve:
It stated this at boot. However, flashing the kernel back over has removed the message and still retained SuperSU.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] finotti:
Did you check if your CM13 version/snapshot was compatible with the version of the kernel you tried to install?
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] FlexiPack:
Indeed that was the problem, the kernel version was up to date. Thanks!

---------- Post added at 07:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:04 PM ----------

The Boeffla-Config App is 'Missing Root'.

As soon as i launch it I get that plus:

'Problem gaining root access. Boeffla-Config will not work.

I'm using CM13 and I have granted it root access. It listed as allowed and I have root enabled for apps and adb. I'm having similar problems with Titanium backup. This is a clean install, I've barely installed any apps and there are no mods.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] STk3000:
This has gotten insane, reboot 2 times a day. Sometimes I just find my phone asking for my PIN, who knows how many missed calls I got
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] venereo:
Why are you speaking as if you don't have any other option?

I can help you: flash your favorite ROM and simply don't flash boeffla after.

Is it that difficult?
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Bluefreak1988:
Hey!

Today I tried USB OTG for the first time and my S5 crashes immediately. Is that a known issue?

Or am I doing something wrong?

I'm using the latest cm13 nightly and latest boeffla kernel version.
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] andip71:
Yes, it is a known issue since the Linux upstream (which I am not in favour CM team does).

It also happened with stock kernel last time I tested it (1st of Nov).

It might be fixed meanwhile, so I will put an updated version out today.

Andi
[Galaxy S 5 Original Android Development] Triviox:
Great kernel, im using last days and can confirm this work won a donation =)