yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
Wow that can't be right...

You actually posted a semi-nude model, what would your wife think bro? lol

Seriously though, that's pretty amazing and may be hard to beat, but you know I have a few tricks up my sleeve.

Just found out the sellers town had white out conditions today and couldn't mail the phone but promised to overnight it Monday morning and now (especially after seeing your post) my fingers are itching to get my hands on that device.

Guess I'll see y'all Tuesday bud...

Enjoy the rest of your weekend fellas and wud up [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION]?
[ONE Android Development] ziepicwaffle:
Sorry for the noob question [emoji14] . From reading your thing a question popped into my mind. If you're clean flashing a ROM, and you have a nandroid backup of your old ROM, can you clean flash and then restore the data from your old ROM in twrp? Or would that not be a good idea?

Thanks!

(I've googled it but the only thing I could find was stuff from a few years ago and titanium backup has never really worked well for me)
[ONE Android Development] ZETREK:
any recomended custom kernel with cpu+i/0 setting guyz?
[ONE Android Development] FSadino:
Yea, stock kernel
[ONE Android Development] dodsq:
On latest build (02042016) livescreen service has stopped, I'm come from 31 build and dirty flashing ( just wipe /cache /dalvik). Is anyone have same problem?
[ONE Android Development] lifelesslegend:
Quite a lot of people are having problems with the lockscreen. It's CM messing up some code :(
[ONE Android Development] dodsq:
So this issue come from latest cm nighlty build? Right? So, if i try to reinstall with clean flash, it will face same problem?
[ONE Android Development] UltraBoykj:
This is not a typical way of restoring data to a clean flash. Normally if you clean flash, you restore data / apps via titanium or Google restore. Nandroid backups and restores are usually used for recovering to working conditions when something you have built doesn't work. I suggest you use titanium.

That said:

I have found out recently a "semi clean" flash is formatting everything but data and flashing works fine. This precludes me to think that your proposed restore may actually work.

+1 from my 1+
[ONE Android Development] ziepicwaffle:
Thanks for the answer! I'll stick to the "semi clean" flash and google restore when clean flashing just to be safe.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Its a "dirty flash"... I advocate clean, but know its a pain in the [MENTION=237736]SS[/MENTION] too.. ;)
[ONE Android Development] spr33:
To those that have complained about photo image quality compared to Sultans ROM - has anyone done a side by side comparison between the two?
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
The wakelock was 2 hours and my phone was awake for just 1h40... :)

I'm going to try a clean flash with 3103 build. Can you tell me the gapps you use? So I can exclude that problem too.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
There's a 2/4 version of the rom.. I use a modified 20/3 slim mini..
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Yeah I saw, but since you already tested the 3103 and said it was more then ok I'm going to try that first. :D

Problem is still here... I'm losing 4,5% per hour without using the phone.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
1. Stock kernel/settings?..

2. Sync and location on?

3. Any apps showing up as wakelocks or high drain?

4. WiFi set to always scanning under location settings?

5. Was a clean install?

6. Viper or other mod installed?
[ONE Android Development] JonasMeyer:
Which build is most stable one at the moment? im on the 25th build of last month btw. I was reading good things about the 31th build ... can someone confirm that?

Thx :)

Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Answerd between the lines

Edit: you use mohit modified slimm gapps? I'll try the 2803 version.
[ONE Android Development] _tony:
https://github.com/asksven/BetterBatteryStats-Knowledge-Base/wiki/bam_dmux_wakelock

"Known conditions of occurence:

Google Tracks, Google Maps Location services"
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
I modify gapps to my wants, added apps and other files to save me from multiple flashes and uneeded downloads.. If you turn off sync/location when not in use you'll get a bit less drain.. But an app or Mother Google is most likely the cause.
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Ah ok :)

I'll try a clean flash and keep an eye on it. Maybe I'll try to restore apps from Play store instead of TB. Could that help?
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Maybe?.. I don't use TB...
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
So you always have to set all your apps again after a clean flash? Setting aren't saved or are they?
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
I save SMS/calls/contacts and use helium for a couple apps, but when testing I need to experience it as a new user.. A bit of a pain, but rules out bugs..
[ONE Android Development] bucketheadmjs:
Senseless exploitation of robots... Damn though! [emoji12]

---------- Post added at 01:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 PM ----------

Not to jump in but I would have to agree with [MENTION=5165039]Setting.Out[/MENTION] here. I know TB is uber popular but I think it is over used in a lot of situations. Over time it can cause lagging and other issues. It is a good idea to let Android restore what apps and data it can on a clean flash. This feature has improved in Mm. Still not great though IMO. Be selective about what data you choose to restore.
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Didn't know it could cause problems or lag. Thanks for the heads up guys!

Will try a clean flash with Google restore.
[ONE Android Development] FSadino:
TB is the first APP that I install after a clean flash to restore all my useful apps and I never had such lag or issues with it.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
I've read a few instances, but they seem rare...
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Anyone see this bug on 2/4?.. After unlocking the bottom lockscreen options stay and remain functional..
[ONE Android Development] FSadino:
I believe that instances are related to some apps restored and not TB itself
[ONE Android Development] lifelesslegend:
People on other CM based ROMS are reporting similar problems. To get rid of it, apparently pressing the ghost icons gets rid of them
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Could be TB, the apps, user error or phone.. Data can become corrupt, old (like the data was from a previous android or app version) or have other issues and cause similar problems.. Either way, still very rare.. :)

---------- Post added at 03:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:21 PM ----------

Until the next unlock.. :)
[ONE Android Development] saiwala:
Happened today a random reboot, in a parallel call. This is a known issue or do I something wrong? :)

*03.30 build
[ONE Android Development] Wisiwyg:
version? customizations?
[ONE Android Development] saiwala:
03.30 buld, only custom font
[ONE Android Development] AdrianM:
It's really tiring saying the same thing again and again, but here we go again:

Have you tried the latest version before writing your post? Never report a bug if you are not using the latest version available. The bug might have got fixed. Oh, and even if you on the latest version, before reporting bugs always try a clean flash to see if the problem persists.
[ONE Android Development] Wisiwyg:
try loading up the 3/31 build (it is a really good one) and do the 'dirty-clean' wipe described earlier:

Place the rom on your phone

boot to recovery

wipe system, cache, & dalvik, then flash the 3/31 build

don't load any customizations and run it for a day or so to see if the problem repeats

If not, make a nandroid and then try adding your preferred customizations one at a time, running the phone for a while with each before adding another. You'll be able to go back to your nandroid if something screws up.

if all this doesn't solve the problem, your best solution is to wipe the phone with a factory reset, then flash the rom without customizations.

The 4/2 build has something going on with the lock screen, so 3/31 is the latest/greatest, for now.
[ONE Android Development] saiwala:
I'm not new to these things, and you don't have to answer to my post, even if you have to read it, bro :)

But since when, the latest version is the guarantor of the lack of bugs? CM will still not give sleep (note the last build) ;)

Nevertheless, thanks for the comment! :) [MENTION=2645223]Wisiwyg[/MENTION] thank you very much!
[ONE Android Development] overem:
Downloading 03/04 build. Anyone tested for a lockscreen issue?

Отправлено с моего A0001 через Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] AdrianM:
Neither am I.

It is not. But how do you know that the bug you are experiencing was not fixed if you haven't tried it? Let's not play this game and fill the thread with useless posts. It's common sense not to report bugs without trying the latest available version and more importantly without trying it as clean flash.
[ONE Android Development] toniq:
ошибки связанные с экраном блокировки не исправили(

Errors associated with the lock screen is not corrected (
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Newest build hasn't fixed the lock screen bug.. :(

On first boot/setup they are gone, but after a couple lock/unlocks, they returned.. !!!
[ONE Android Development] Wisiwyg:
Got a couple of fc on lock for the first couple of boots. Did a cache wipe and rebooted. One more fc on live lock, then seems to have ironed itself out.

edit: that was on the 4/2 build... now dl the 4.3 build.4

edit2: loaded 4/3 and got a lot of play services fc as well as live lock fc... restoring a nandroid and going back to 3.31 until the lock issue is resolved
[ONE Android Development] Brian325:
If you turn on live lock screen it corrects itself. Strange
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
So, did a clean flash and restored all the apps from Play Store... And still the wakelock stays.

The only app that used some data is Gmail but that's normal since I told it to sync 999 days instead of 30. :(
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Are you using cm's xLock or another similar app? Apps that ping for sync or location don't always use a lot of data, but wake up the radios and it takes a heavy toll.. A test to check against this is switching to airplane mode and see if it reduces..

Past that, voodoo may work.. For that you need a phone replica and some sewing needles.. Lol
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Not using anything special. This is a screenshot of the partial wakelocks, I don't see anything special. But still losing almost 10%/h ?
[ONE Android Development] FSadino:
Uninstall Gmail and see if solves
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Try inbox, its gmail, but I don't see such a heavy battery toll..
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Gmail is because I did a clean install and told it to sync 999 days instead of 30 :) since then it stopped... So that's not the problem.

BTW tried Inbox a while ago and I don't like it like Gmail.

Edit: I see all the wakelocks stopped and the average % lost is going down. Will give it a few days to settle first.

Thanks for all the feedback!
[ONE Android Development] Chikko:
Since release of 22/03 and now with release of 01/04 i have random reboots.

Inviato dal mio A0001 utilizzando Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] kdrkdr:
I have a Bluetooth speaker which did not connect on the march 29. It does connect on April 3! Worth a try
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Without logs, we can't fix it.. ;)
[ONE Android Development] Chikko:
Where can i find it?

Inviato dal mio A0001 utilizzando Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] Wisiwyg:
I see the 4/4 build up. Anyone know if the unlock issue is resolved? TIA

edit: tried it for myself... was getting FC on Play Services and reverted back to 3.31
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Also use the search bar.. ;)

http://xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-cm-12-builds-t3045053/post66048252

http://xdaforums.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-cm-12-builds-t3045053/post66048610

---------- Post added at 05:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 PM ----------

Not yet, CM hasn't fixed it yet..
[ONE Android Development] IronJacob:
Just flashed. Good rom! Just one question: does this rom has any camera optimization?

Thank you

Inviato dal mio A0001 utilizzando Tapatalk
[ONE Android Development] lifelesslegend:
Not as of yet, but Jgcaap is trying to implement the ColorOS blobs into this ROM.
[ONE Android Development] joefso:
very interesting development, a rom with cmte and coloros blobs
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
I wasn't using my phone, it was charging in the kitchen. When I walked by I saw the phone was rebooting :eek: it was a soft reboot.

Any idea what happened?

Last kmesg: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B88N5Un-eL49N3hVRUdqbV9IMDA/view?usp=docslist_api
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Can't view it...
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Strange... It is set to Public :-/

Edit: do you need more then this?
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Hmmm.. What's your setup? CPU, file system ect..
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Nothing special.. CPU is stock, file system also (ext4 right?)
[ONE Android Development] ilb80in42:
Clean install, no camera.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Don't you have camera next?
[ONE Android Development] tiny4579:
I don't really have a workaround. You could try reverting the latest blob update commit from TheMuppets for vendor_oppo. It could be something there. Or it could be the modem or RIL update since both those also were merged yesterday. I'm doubting the modem/RIL. I have my bets on the blobs.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
I haven't repo sync yet since two days as I was narrowing done bugs, but will do it today. The annoying thing here is that system is working extra.

I'm trying to find what can be causing this. I believe is something on system/core level. In case you find something, please share. I'll include!

Thanks.
[ONE Android Development] ilb80in42:
To be more helpful:

Same firmware + same gapps + rom 12.05 - camera installed

Same firmware + same gapps + rom 15.05 - no camera installed
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Hmmm I have clean flashed and appears to me. Could you please re-download and retry? Sorry of any trouble but the thing is I have. My version is this one.

http://www.drdevs.com/devs/jgcaap/oneplus/rom/cm-12.1-20150515-jgcaap-bacon.zip
[ONE Android Development] didicola:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=60763982&postcount=11692
[ONE Android Development] ilb80in42:
It's the GAAPS??? Why I can't use with this rom the GAAPS I'm used to?
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Build new rom without a service from qualcom which is taking 10% of battery life. Resynced with CM today and also made small changes to kernel. Hopefully next build will have a much less battery drain.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
ah maybe thats causing issues. I have included libs for the camera next if you try flash another version... possibly is incompatible. Use the gaps i provided, is the best combination. ;)
[ONE Android Development] ilb80in42:
Don't worry with my problem. I'll find another solution to viper.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
O Finally discovered what made the build force close... I was using an experimental method of building, which is new for Web view... Completely forgot about it xD sorry about any trouble. Soon 90 extra patches applied
[ONE Android Development] tiny4579:
So I'm on the 13th nightly with the latest kernel source and I'm still seeing the battery drain a bit faster in Battery Monitor Widget. That makes the touchscreen driver change unfortunately very suspect. See what happens if you run with the build you have but only with the driver change reverted.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
We can try that. But I believe this issue was caused by the time service from Qcom. We had this feature in the past with CM on other devices. I added to test and noticed that battery drain started since then together with some kernel changes. I reverted it on kernel level and rom level some changes which should give a better battery life. Just need to rebuild as I now discovered why it fc... Let's check new build soon... Building. :)
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
When battery drain started : https://github.com/jgcaaprom/androi...mmit/ca95a843b0030bfc2257c7b5933a9b5a04c6201c
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
And also : https://github.com/jgcaaprom/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8974/commits/new

From PM / cpuidle: System resume hang fix with cuddle forward.

I created now a new version with :

https://github.com/jgcaaprom/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8974/commits/new2

Where it was noticed an improvement. But still there is more stuff to be done. I just need some more time and a bit knowledge to mod the mpdecision driver so that the refresh rate is lowered just a bit. I'm sure that'll be enough to provide more battery life without noticing the lower performance.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Also seems that the touch driver we have activates more than three cores. We have to change that as it is a complete battery killer. We can easily. Improve this.
[ONE Android Development] tiny4579:
The idle drain went from 30-50mA per Battery Monitor Widget with the new touchscreen firmware to around 10mA per the same app.

Since that was the only change so far that's improved the drain based on dealing with just stock, I have to assume the touchscreen firmware. It's a shame since it actually helps people.

And evidence on the firmware activating more cores? That's not a touch driver change. Did you pull the new blobs including mpdecision. The firmware doesn't control the cores. It's lower level than that.

Not to mention I'm coming from a build (stock) that never introduced that qcom time change.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Sorry I didn't complete the statement. The touch boost driver. We are using from boeffla kernel, and from what I monitored the phone is using on touch 4 cores. I'll see how I can change to only 2 instead. Like that we can save alot battery.

How are you able to measure the touchscreen btw?
[ONE Android Development] tiny4579:
I'm not. The app battery monitor widget measures overall drain. Set it as a widget or enable the service and set the monitoring for 1 or 2 minutes and let the phone idle for a while. There will be variation but I look for an overall decent jump that seems consistent. You may need 10 minutes of idle to get a good picture on how these changes play. This is only idle drain. What you're talking about with touch boost is related to actual usage.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
It says it wanted to mount it as ext4, so I'm guessing yes.. Lol
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
So nothing special happend either? If I didn't check my phone I think I wouldn't know. It was at 99%, didn't ask a pincode.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Got it to download.. Stupid Google.. What root apps are you running?.. xposed?.. Nearly the entire log is SuperSU spam.. Still reading.. 4000 lines and su, su, su... ... :/
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
No Xposed...

Root: adaway, TB, Helium, Root browser and BBS.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
That was a lot to read... 90% was supersu spam and it looks to be app related.. I'd guess a root app desperately requesting root privileges..
[ONE Android Development] superiscch:
Thanks for the look! Strange stuff... All the apps have root access. I know BBS asks for root access when removed from charger, but it was still connected. Let's hope it doesn't happen again.
[ONE Android Development] UltraBoykj:
I noticed a lot of SU spam in my logs as well and also had a random reboot this am.

f2fs, except system ext4, xposed.

+1 from my 1+
[ONE Android Development] mars1mack:
After using for more than a month, I am confirming this is a great ROM. Thank you [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] !!

At first, I wanted to reinstall RESURRECTION REMIX because this ROM has fewer features than RESURRECTION REMIX.

But after trying for several days, it is stable, fast and power saving.
[ONE Android Development] lifelesslegend:
The server speed has improved a lot recently. I'm seeing high download speeds even with no peers :)
[ONE Android Development] joshiameya:
This ROM plus xposed is super combo .

Here are my current stats for 31st build plus xposed greenify.

11 hrs have passed by, still at 50%.

Usage: normal, music for 1 hour via Bluetooth during workout
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
May I suggest heading over to attached thread link and see what my buddy [MENTION=5867207]v7[/MENTION] requires to post an "accurate" BBS dump log and then first thing in the a.m. (as soon as you unplug/wake your device) send it to him. Nobody knows these issues better (no offense [MENTION=5165039]Setting.Out[/MENTION]) and he will pinpoint exactly what is causing it without the guesswork and trial and error. Make sure you tell him your setup because he may assume you're running Amplify and suggest tweaking those numbers/services okay? And please remember he's very picky about how (and how quickly) you get that dump log to him, if you even make a call before doing it he'll have you do it the next day, but he has to be this way for accuracy. Tell him I sent you and be may even answer you before lunch. Just kidding, he's tagged in this post so he'll know already and I'll get my $.01 referral fee. lol

Good luck bud.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=3095884
[ONE Android Development] sangalaxyi9003:
Can anyone suggest how to reduce the vibration intensity settings? I need to further reduce the intensity from the minimum in the app setting and also reduce the per app vibration to short bursts duration. May be some one can guide how to change it in root.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Simple searches... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jb.vibrate.pattern

I'm sure there are more options.. www.google.com
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Lockscreen bug is fixed guys. Sorry my silence but exam on Monday. :) hug everyone.
[ONE Android Development] sangalaxyi9003:
Thanks for your response. I want to know how to change it in the system build codes.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Second link.. ;)
[ONE Android Development] sangalaxyi9003:
Friend I have checked but couldn't get it that's why asked. Already i have to minimum in kernel settings. I need to further reduce it. I want the default vibration duration to be short or very short not the default one. Help me.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Either an app or I found this..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2888043/controlling-vibration-intensity-in-android-phones-is-it-possible

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=54230306&postcount=10
[ONE Android Development] saiwala:
It is 4.04(*new) or wait 5.04? :)
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
That's it.. But if you want to wait I can't stop you... ;)
[ONE Android Development] sangalaxyi9003:
Thanks mate. I tried but we can't edit the minimum strength which is 17. Is there any other method?
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
My Google is the same as yours.. :(
[ONE Android Development] anjo88:
Lock screen still has the annoying bug?

Enviado do meu A0001 através de Tapatalk