yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
There is a new rom on the test folder. Just a little slower for sqlite but fast as hell. Need testers.
[ONE Android Development] aclup3:
Wow... This is sorcery lol from the first build of today to this last one, the improvements were huge! Looks like my opo just got a new snapdragon 805 chip ahah thanks!

---------- Post added at 03:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:15 AM ----------

Sory but cant right now.. Im going to sleep, college tomorow
[ONE Android Development] nikeman513:
Are these commits for cm13 or 12.1? I'm sorry, so many updates I'm not sure which is getting them all! I'm very curious!

Can you please update your changelog on the first page when doing these? Right now I know you've got cm-13 testing, you're still updating cm-12, and you're doing stuff with bionic. I don't know if those are getting incorporated into the new cm-12 updates or cm-13, or if it's strictly in the test folder of cm-12. That kind of info would be awesome, and a lot less confusing to new users. Thanks!
[ONE Android Development] KiD3991:
Hey there. Will test this ROM. Will be on the rom in the Test folder. My usage is pretty minimal, hope I can contribute by testing.
[ONE Android Development] Flak:
Xposed still overwrite your ART tweaks, or whatever tweaks it was overwriting?
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Just tried 11/01. Looked OK so I flashed the Xposed hack. Still looked OK. Then I found Chrome and Firefox both crash. Any ideas?

[MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] .. can you reproduce or do you need logs? This was a dirty flash, so I dunno what's up, but I need sleep

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
We'll need to update files... Let first finish the tests and we'll do that after.

Try both...

Com on.... You need to read more... [emoji14] No cm-13.0 for now. But these discoveries will be implemented on cm-13.0 too
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
[MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] Here's what I found on Chrome. Looks like a Bionic change. Did bcopy() get removed?

11-02 03:54:39.286 E/chromium_android_linker(7859): Open: Could not open libchrome.so in zip file /data/app/com.android.chrome-2/base.apk: Could not find symbol 'bcopy'

More about me at https://eddon.systems

---------- Post added at 04:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:57 AM ----------

[MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] Opera dies cause of bcopy too. So, out of 5 browsers I'm down to one

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Did you re-download the version of yesterday? Because that issue I already solved.

Wait for today's build ready in an 1hour.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
building a cm-13.0 for someone to test if is already more stable.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
new version of cm-12.1 coming, forgot to update webview to 46.0.2490.76 as is vital for google apps to work. 30 min and is ready. Enjoy.
[ONE Android Development] nosphor:
Hi man, any news about my request about Gello in cm13 ?
[ONE Android Development] aclup3:
is it only me, or the latest build is FC the cm sms app?
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Will get the source tomorow and try build.

read above please.
[ONE Android Development] aclup3:
Thanks. I was just cheking if google apps included SMS servidos, only now realised that its almost all messaging apps
[ONE Android Development] Manav Bhagia:
Does the cm 13 build boot ?
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Alright cm-12.1 is online and everything is working fine now.
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
Is that under the test folder? I tried downloading it from "cm12.1" folder and it's a dead file. Tried it 3 times but no file.

Tom 2.0
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
There seems to be a problem at the server. We'll have to wait.

I believe i was able to build a faster ROM right now but is on test folder. It includes webview changes from Android 6.0. Needs testing.
[ONE Android Development] Manav Bhagia:
Cm 13.0 ?
[ONE Android Development] KiD3991:
If CM13 is ready to be a daily driver I am more than happy to test it.

My only concern is that somewhat I have to restore all my apps from scratch(on playstore) because there is no restore function. (This was for the CM12.1, tad bit less battery friendly coming from sultanxda)
[ONE Android Development] aclup3:
when i updated to marshmallow on my lg gpad, tinanium backup worked for me
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
I hope 6.0 is stable enough because I'm burning through battery today like 90 going West, 1.5 hours SOT and I'm down to 36%. Fast and responsive as hell but at a cost.

Guess I'll wait to hear from you cuz there's a file with today's date in every single folder.

Tom 2.0
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Backup+

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Normal he has underclock ed... If you underclock you should achieve similar results.
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
I'm only getting 7-8 hours sot at full clock speeds.. ;p
[ONE Android Development] Miksel12:
Download goes really slow, any idea on whats going on?
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Me too.. 7+ hours @ 11kb/s
[ONE Android Development] aclup3:
trying to download some build? The servers have been down for a few hours now
[ONE Android Development] sash89:
[MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] tested latest cm13 build,phone freezes un language select at startup!
[ONE Android Development] Kuoi:
I'm impressed

I've tested about 6 roms (KK and LP) for my F2FS partitions /data and /cache and i'm impressed with this one from 10-02-2015.

Faster and smoother than other popular roms i've used , and i now regret i didn't discovered this gem earlier. :eek:

I was looking to replace my roms because Sygic navigation app gave much problems on all of them.

On this version it is working like it should ... I'm happy ! :victory:

Thanks for this rom :good:
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Did anyone get 11/02 downloaded who might be willing to put up a mirror/Google-drive/dropbox? Either that or I have to go back to 10/20 'cause of that bcopy() issue killing my browsers.

The entire Internet seems screwed today
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Try download now... Works well. :)

If you encounter issues, use the test version
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Traceroute is showing downed routers between us.

More about me at https://eddon.systems

---------- Post added at 08:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:37 PM ----------

Ok .. I think I found a way around it. I'm glad I have my own server I can route through.

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
If you want a fast system use ext4. F2fs is still a long way to go. Only has benefits over cache.
[ONE Android Development] KiD3991:
So still no-go for CM13 huh?
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
This 11.02 test version is super fast and very smooth [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] and the touch is really responsive. Apple code maybe? Whatever it is keep doing it! Let you know how it runs overnight okay bud?

Tom 2.0

---------- Post added 03-11-2015 at 12:00 AM ---------- Previous post was 02-11-2015 at 11:50 PM ----------

Oh and good luck on your exams tomorrow.

Tom 2.0
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Here's some interesting benchmarks...

I like Vellamo since its higher level and thus tests more of your OS and libraries and less of your raw CPU ... so its closer to end user experience and actually runs javascript tests in a web browser

Galaxy S6 3589

LGE LG G4 3951

LGE LG Flex2 4076

This ROM 4223

Not bad huh? This is 11/02 w/hacked Xposed (plus other changes but they don't affect performance).

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
Nice! Any idea how much is it for OPO stock CM12.1?
[ONE Android Development] Sakti51:
Can I have the hacked xposed?

Sent from my A0001
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
12.0 (Android 5.0) is 2932. Don't know about 12.1.

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
Wow, 4223 compared to 2932 is a huge improvement. I knew this ROM was great, but never realized by how much.

Thanks [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION], amazing work!
[ONE Android Development] miguepereira77:
Is it the one inside 12.1 folder/test??? Think I've downloaded the latest from 12.1 folder instead... Thanks

Sent using XDA One
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
[MENTION=5880917]uudruid74[/MENTION], Out of curiosity I've tried to run the same benchmark on my phone.

I got 2973 on the Vellamo Chrome browser benchmark (11/02 regular jgcaap rom). This is slightly higher than the 12.0 mark but nowhere near the value you got. I also ran AnTuTu and got 48761 (slightly lower than past results I had with previous jgcaap rom versions).

How do you get your result? Are you overclocking or something? Are you shutting down any system services?
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Since every ROM does battery management differently and uses different governors, etc, I level the playing field by switching from "Balanced" to "Performance" for benchmarks. See if that makes a difference.

Is that cheating? To me, its logical that you would turn off "slow" before benchmarking. But I don't think like everyone else. I'm still in performance mode ... I'm on AC so why not?

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
Yes, it's the one inside the "test " folder.

Tom 2.0
[ONE Android Development] miguepereira77:
I just tried...Very fast...unfortunately some of my apps FC, Amazon (not a big deal) and my bank app (Big deal) [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION]
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
Well, that made a huge difference. I got 4348 on the Vellamo chrome benchmark.

Now I can relax, knowing my phone is no slouch. :)

However, I do think it's kind of cheating. As you've said, you prefer Vellamo as it is closer to end user experience, but setting the battery mode to "performance" keeps the CPU at top speed all the time. This is far from the normal user experience. Using this mode regularly would cause significant heat up and battery drain.

I do feel that benchmarking at "balanced" mode is more realistic.
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
But thats likely to make your tests go all over the place! See what I mean? I'm looking for stable tests that are reproducible that give an accurate measurement of OS efficiency. As for 'end user experience', I'm not expecting the benchmark to 'feel' like I'm using the device or something. Cranking it up just keeps the system at one speed so you can compare it between runs and between different ROMs.

The cheating part is that Vellamo doesn't state what mode the tests were taken in. We have no way of knowing, which is why 90% of the time I just compare with previous runs.

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
Your case for having well controlled, consistent benchmarking conditions is very valid, but even in "performance" mode there are many uncontrollable variables that may affect the results. The top one is CPU temperature.

But anyway, this is not a benchmarking thread but a ROM thread. So, can you tell if you see a significant change in benchmark results over time, as this ROM develops and matures?
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Exam done... Let's see if my grade is good :)
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Which app bank? I'll test
[ONE Android Development] miguepereira77:
This one...thank you

BancSabadell

Sent using XDA One
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
Many apps are FCing on the 11/02 test version: Amazon appstore, IMDb, TuneIn Radioo, Pulse, Ynet, Haaretz (the last 2 are local news apps).

The Wikipedia app caused repetetive black screens, and I had to manually kill it.

rdio just got stuck on its openning screen.

I also got a Google Play Services FC error twice.

I did not have any of these issues in the regular 11/02 or any previous version.
[ONE Android Development] nosphor:
Finger crossed :D

I'm actually on the latest cm12.1 deodexed build with xposed v75. Can I dirty flash the latest cm13 build ? Will i still be able to flash xposed v75 with it ?
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Be patient with cm-13 is not stable. Well have to build a new zip for that.
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
dirty-flashed 11/02 over 11/02-test - All apps are working fine again.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Which version of rom are you using?
[ONE Android Development] miguepereira77:
Your regular CM 12.1 from 02/11...No FC with it... I tried (clean install) your 02/11 test and it gave me FC in some apps

Sent using XDA One
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Amazon app and your bank app working without issues.
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Yesterday I had to rebuild the rom several of times... Please re-download and test please.
[ONE Android Development] miguepereira77:
Just to be clear...The one that gave me FC is the ROM placed in CM 12.1/test folder... I've downloaded today...

Sent using XDA One
[ONE Android Development] thloe:
@ jgcaap

which rom are you using for dailydriver - 12.1 or 13
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
[MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION], I forgot to mention that the one-time hard reboot issue I was having when opening the Play Store has vanished on this 11.02 test build. Nice job!

And here's the scores you guys were talking while running Performance & Balanced (respectively.)

Oh and someone posted something about this ROM maturing...

Well I can confirm it's bypassed the adolescent and teenage years, been married and DIVORCED, sent the kids to college and is now in the absolute prime of its life. If it matures much more it will be sitting in a rocking chair reading to the grandkids. Now IS the time!

Tom 2.0

---------- Post added at 09:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:36 AM ----------

Antutu for comparison. Ranked 14th.

Tom 2.0
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
:laugh: I'm the one... I never doubted the maturity of this ROM. I'm using it for many months now.

What I meant was to ask [MENTION=5880917]uudruid74[/MENTION] if he has the history of these benchmarks results. To know if they've been improving from version to version.
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Vellamo tracks CPU temp during the test, and is barely gets warm. I used to play a 3D game and Chromecast it to another screen ... that would bring the CPU well into throttle!

I need to repeat my 'standard' benchmark test to really be sure (meaning running mp3s through Viper during the test, but oddly that doesn't seem to affect the results much, but that's how I did all my previous tests). And some of the difference is Chrome versions changing, but there is a generally steady improvement.

More about me at https://eddon.systems

---------- Post added at 11:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 AM ----------

CM13 is just a wild test, nowhere near ready and different enough not to dirty flash. You can flash the latest ODEX/Regular build and still use Xposed if you use the Hacked ZIP posted a couple pages back.

Maybe we can get [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] to post it on the first post with the firmware. Looks like there isn't much reason for for deodex anymore.

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Will you post or pm your metal score on vellamo.. I can't cross 2000...
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
2000 would be high for a OPO. I rarely test it since it shouldn't change much, after all it's intent is to bypass the OS. I've gotten from 1791 to 1871. Older numbers were higher, but not sure why. They shouldn't be

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] Setting.Out:
Mid 1900's is where I sit.. I've touched 2000 but never crossed..
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
[MENTION=5880917]uudruid74[/MENTION], I absolutely agree with you, there is no need for deodexed versions anymore. I've switched back and forth and haven't noticed any difference at all been them and now ONLY use odexed builds with [MENTION=532909]Maccas[/MENTION] (HACKED) Xposed zip. The thread "is" a bit confusing about this but with all the work (and school) going on I hate to even ask [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] to modify the thread.?

And I'm pushing the ****e out of this test version and still haven't run across any issues yet.

Tom 2.0
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Doing some tests. How is battery with ROM from 2nd November?
[ONE Android Development] Purerawenergy:
I've got 1.75 hours of screen time so far and almost 80% of my battery left and I I've been streaming music on bluetooth headphones, browsing the web AND made a bunch of calls. At this rate I'll be over 8 hours.

Tom 2.0
[ONE Android Development] Angelcho:
so, does the odexed version work with xposed?
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Yes, but use the Hacked one ...

Here ... https://www.dropbox.com/s/lpjd7sg2mn06x88/xposed-HACK-v75-sdk22-arm-Macca-Hack.zip?dl=0

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] tacohell:
Seems good - no issues generally with this build
[ONE Android Development] aclup3:
whith not the last rom of 02/11, i am using the one with arround 360mb, and i got the best SOT to date (arround 4h45min until 8%). im gonna install the 03/11 now
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
Nice to see so many happy faces :)
[ONE Android Development] jokermithun:
can i use synapse ukm for kernel tweaking????
[ONE Android Development] sash89:
What does that mean?and why official one should not work?
[ONE Android Development] uudruid74:
Official Xposed (Latest v75) will work fine with this ROM as long as you use the deodexed builds, which are not updated very often and may not offer maximum performance. Xposed will also bypass some of the changes jgcaap has made.

By using the 'hacked' Zip, which is a mix of jgcaap's code over original v75, you can install it on a normal odex version of the ROM with no penalties. I used to use the deodex and I no longer need it. My crazy colorOS camera, Viper, OmniSwitcher, Xposed, and everything else I add all work flawlessly with standard odex releases.

FYI, if you scroll back, you can see the original discussion about it in the thread.

More about me at https://eddon.systems

---------- Post added at 12:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:41 AM ----------

[emoji1] [emoji2] [emoji3] [emoji4] [emoji5] [emoji12] [emoji39] [emoji28] [emoji23] [emoji56] [emoji57] [emoji196] [emoji275] [emoji274] [emoji318] [emoji316] [emoji204][emoji48] [emoji14] [emoji13] [emoji1] [emoji3] [emoji2]

That enough? How about some old school ones ...

;) :D }-] :)

and a rose @}-;-'--

OK ... Sorry, done now.

More about me at https://eddon.systems

---------- Post added at 12:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 AM ----------

Think you can, at least it used to work. I think he has his own UKM for it in the kernel thread (there is a separate thread for the kernel with its own download site if you want to download it separately)

Most of us trust jgcaap and don't tweak the kernel. And we're all tweakers, admins, programmers, and what not. Its not like other ROMs where you have to fiddle with it to get good performance or battery. You get the best of both by just leaving it like it is.

If you tweak stuff, be sure to run tests before and after to verify the validity of your changes and if you find something that works better, share!

More about me at https://eddon.systems
[ONE Android Development] sash89:
U made it clear buddy!thanks a lot
[ONE Android Development] jgcaap:
New rom will be online to test qualcom math routines for bionic... Let's see if it is also cool
[ONE Android Development] jokermithun:
running 3rd Nov build...its good....
[ONE Android Development] digitalpig82:
I just did a small test run of that test build (20151102) and I can confirm it feels snappy as hell. :) The touch responsiveness is awesome on that build. :good: [MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION] what did you do with that version?? :) Will you take over these changes to the "normal" build?

Unfortunately, I got FC for the Amazon app and the Google Opinion Rewards app, so I ended my test run after a short period of time... :(

I dirty flashed the normal 20151103 build on it. No problems with that build so far, still have to figure out whether the test version was maybe a bit snappier.
[ONE Android Development] sash89:
I installed that test build too but i have google play services fc every second,
[ONE Android Development] digitalpig82:
I think this is actually not a problem with the ROM itself.

I had the same problem when my play services updated themselves to version 8.3.00. Every time I enabled location service, I got FC popping up every few seconds. The culprit was that I disabled keep awake for play services in privacy guard. I enabled it back again and the FC were gone.

Did you disable anything in privacy guard? Maybe you should take a look at it.
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
There is definitely a problem with the 11/02 test build - quite a few users here had FCs of various apps as well as Google Play Services. I had these issues and they were gone after Iv'e flashed the regular 11/02 build (no change in any settings).
[ONE Android Development] digitalpig82:
There seems to be a problem with the test build from 20151102, you're right about that. I experienced FCs as well. But your problem concerning play services ("I also got a Google Play Services FC error twice") sounds different to his problem with play services ("i have google play services fc every second"), right? ;) Since I got the very same problem as he did, I thought I'd share my experience about how I got rid of it.
[ONE Android Development] llevin:
:good: OK then:cool:
[ONE Android Development] bojiokia:
[MENTION=2040569]jgcaap[/MENTION],

I see others CM12.1 rom(sultan, kat, temasek) has removed or disable the Display --> Prevent accidental wake-up , because they say the codes is bad, and it's not working.

How about yours? Is this function working normally?
[ONE Android Development] KbaB.BroS:
It's not working here. On CM-12 02/11 build